• This website contains two free eBooks and many free articles plus a massive spreadsheet in two formats.


    • "In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act."
      George Orwell


    Prophets Or Evolution?

    The evolution debate is very simple:

    The prophets claim that God designed the DNA for all species.

    The atheists and evolutionists claim that all DNA was created by a series of accidents, which are called "evolution."

    Only one claim can be correct!! It is God or accidents.

    In 1859, when Darwin published his first book on evolution, scientists knew nothing about the millions of galaxies in the Universe or the billions of cells in a human body. And they certainly knew nothing about the DNA that was inside of the cells.

    So the scientists in Darwin's day thought that life was simple and they believed that the theory of evolution was logical.

    But a lot has been learned about the Universe, cells and DNA since 1859. Let us look at a few of the things that scientists know today about cells and DNA.

    Human DNA is so sophisticated that a single cell, with a single DNA strand, namely the fertilized egg inside of a mother-to-be, has the intelligence on the DNA to create an entire baby who has 30 billion cells and 60,000 miles of blood vessels, etc.

    The blood vessels of this new baby would wrap around the earth, at the equator, twice, with 10,000 miles of blood vessels left over!!

    In addition, when the baby is born he or she will have an incredible brain which is connected to the nervous system, a skull to protect the brain, a spinal cord (the spinal cord is a cylindrical bundle of nerve fibers), a spine to protect the spinal cord, two eyes which are connected to the nervous system, a liver, a pancreas, etc. etc.!! And all of this came from the instructions on a single cell - the fertilized egg!!

    I call the algorithms on the DNA of the fertilized egg, which creates the new baby via billions of cell divisions, the morphing of the embryo algorithms. These algorithms on DNA control the "morphing" of the embryo from a single fertilized egg into a crying baby.

    These algorithms on the DNA of the fertilized egg are incomprehensible in sophistication because they also need to make sure that the 60,000 miles of blood vessels are fully enclosed before blood starts to circulate or else the baby would bleed to death before it was born!!

    Thus, the DNA in the fertilized egg must make sure the cells in the new baby are the
    1) correct types of cells (and there are 200 different types of cells), and
    2) each type of cell must be in the correct locations as the fetus morphs, and
    3) the cells must be created in the correct order.

    As an example of #2, you don't want a million fingernail cells being put in the brain of the developing fetus six weeks after conception or at any other time. The right kinds of cells must be in the right locations at all times.

    You might wonder where the blood for the baby comes from. It comes from the blood of the mother. Try to figure out how the blood gets from the mother to the baby as the 60 thousand miles of blood vessels are being formed. Good luck.

    The complex process by which blood gets from the mother to the baby could not have "evolved" because it had to work perfectly before the first human baby was born on this planet or else no human baby would ever have been born alive on this planet.

    And while all of this is going on something must be keeping track and controlling the billions of cell divisions as the process of cell divisions are happening!!

    For example, you don't want the brain to grow faster than the skull is growing.

    What controls and keeps track of the morphing of the embryo of a new baby as the morphing is going on? No one has a clue because every cell in the baby has exactly the same DNA.

    I should point out that the instructions on DNA do not work like a computer program, they use a type of logic which is beyond human comprehension to replicate. And thousands of other species also use these types of algorithms.

    The sophistication of DNA is not only incomprehensible, it is unimaginable. Wait until you read the "When There Are Sixteen Cells During the Morphing of the Embryo" article which is linked to below.

    The "Sixteen Cells" article will blow your mind because it explains why no team of humans could ever design a computer program which uses the same kind of logic that DNA uses to create a baby from a single fertilized egg!!!!!

    In fact, you can take a peek at this article right now:
    Article: When There Are 16 Cells During the Morphing of the Embryo!!

    It gets worse for the theory of evolution. Not only can DNA not be created in nature, but even if it could the probability that a viable permutation of nucleotides could form by accident is far beyond statistically impossible.

    Randomly creating a viable permutation of nucleotides, even for a mouse, by chance, would be far less likely than picking a single correct atom, hidden from among the atoms in a trillion Universes. This is not an exaggeration!! This statement may not be politically correct but it is easily mathematically correct.

    In addition, the DNA of a male and female human must align with each other (so they can have offspring) and yet their DNA must be very different!!

    For humanity to exist, the DNA of the first male human and the DNA of the first female human had to exist at roughly the same time, and in roughly the same location on the earth (so they could find each other and have children), and their DNA had to be created such that they could have at least one male child and at least one female child to perpetuate the human species.

    The Bible calls these first two humans Adam and Eve and claims they were created by God.

    And these same male/female issues apply to all species which have both a male and female (e.g. dogs and cats). Even turtles have both a male and female and the first male and first female land turtle would not have been very good at finding each other on this planet.

    DNA is so sophisticated that no team of scientists on this planet could, in a thousand years, design and build the DNA for a male and female human from scratch, including the cells the DNA resides in, such that their DNA could create a male and female baby who have features of both the father and mother!!


    The Three Theories

    Let us talk about the three theories for how the first parents of the first human babies on this planet came to exist.

    First, the Bible claims that God created Adam and Eve (I will talk about what Brigham Young said about where God came from in a moment).

    Second, some people claim that humans from another planet, with our intelligence, created the DNA for Adam and Eve. This is not credible if they had our intelligence!! But even if they were smarter than we are, where did THEIR DNA come from? This explanation doesn't explain anything, it just moves the theory of evolution to another planet. This theory also ignores the massive size of space.

    Third, the atheists and evolutionist claim that the DNA for the first human male and first human female came to exist by mindless accidents, which are called "evolution," which started with DNA or RNA for a "first living cell," forming by accident in a warm pond millions of years ago. More about the "first living cell" nonsense below.

    Item #3 describes what is now called the "theory of evolution" and is the primary theory which is challenged on this website. This website has two free eBooks and many free articles which collectively include more than FOUR-HUNDRED REASONS the theory of evolution cannot be true. These articles and books also expose some of the clever deceptions of the atheists.

    The atheists and evolutionists want you to believe the theory of evolution, but with the discovery of DNA in 1953, the theory of evolution has become absolute nonsense as this website demonstrates over and over again.

    DNA is a computer program and many other things. Atheists claim that DNA was "written" by totally random processes. Yet no functional computer program on earth has been written by a random number generator (to simulate evolution). So why would anyone believe that the world's two most sophisticated computer programs (male and female human DNA) came to exist by a series of accidents?

    For example, there is no way that the DNA of a male Gibbon and the DNA of a female Gibbon could RANDOMLY MUTATE until a human DNA strand for both a male and female would result!!!

    As this website will show, there is no possible way the sophistication of DNA and cells could have come to exist by a long series of accidents. The two most sophisticated computer programs on earth, male and female DNA, were carefully designed by God!!

    There is really nothing to debate regarding the theory of evolution because the theory of evolution is so absurd mainly due to the discovery of DNA. How could the world's most sophisticated computer programs for many advanced species, male and female DNA, have come to exist by many billions of pure accidents?

    But the evolution debate will never end. Every time the "creation scientists" (those who debate the evolutionists) totally destroy one of the arguments of the evolutionists, the evolutionists just regroup and come up with some new deception. It is like the game of keep-away.

    I am well aware that it is not "politically correct" to talk about God, but we are talking about science here, not a playground for atheists. "Political correctness" and truth are frequently at war with each other!!

    If God did not exist the truth is that we would not exist!!

    So where did God come from? Brigham Young, who was born in 1801 (Darwin was born in 1809), the second prophet of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (the Mormons), said this about the origin of God:

    • Many have tried to penetrate to the First Cause of all things; but it would be as easy for an ant to number the grains of sand on the earth. It is not for man, with his limited intelligence, to grasp eternity in his comprehension ... It would be as easy for a gnat to trace the history of man back to his origin as for man to fathom the First Cause of all things, lift the veil of eternity, and reveal the mysteries that have been sought after by philosophers from the beginning.

    Since 4000 B.C. the prophets have been saying that God created all things. Modern science, because of the discovery of DNA in 1953, has proven the prophets have been correct all along.

    Darwin, to his credit, had no clue that DNA existed or even that cells existed. Thus Darwin could not tell the difference between macroevolution (i.e. a new species has been created by random accidents) and microevolution (i.e. variety within the same species, such as the difference between a Collie dog and a Great Dane dog and a Chihuahua dog - they are all "dogs").

    Darwin observed microevolution but he could not have known that microevolution has nothing to do with the creation of a new species. It was not until 1953, with the discovery of DNA, that the term "unique species" could be correctly defined to be a "unique DNA structure."

    Macroevolution is a false theory because it is impossible to take a highly complex computer program (i.e. the DNA for a species) and mutate it via random accidents (meaning via evolution) into a NEW AND IMPROVED species.

    • Important Note: It is important to understand that the atheists, such as Richard Dawkins, intentionally obfuscate the terms microevolution and macroevolution in order to get converts. For example, in the book: The Greatest Show On Earth, atheist Richard Dawkins uses example after example of microevolution and claims they are examples of true evolution. The entire book is a giant lie.

    One of the greatest lies invented by the atheists is to use a deceptive definition of the term "species." By inventing a deceptive definition of the term "species" they can generate all kinds of "evidence" for the theory of evolution!!! Seven chapters in one of the free eBooks on this website are needed to expose the deceptions of the atheists relative to deceptive definitions.

    In short, based on what Darwin knew in 1882, when he died, his theory of evolution was correct. It could not be disproven until 1953 when DNA was discovered.

    But since 1830, which was 29 years BEFORE Darwin's first book, the LDS church has been opposed to the theory of evolution. In fact, the LDS church was responsible for the first book to describe Natural Selection and thus evolution, even before Darwin wrote his first book on evolution!!

    The Book of Mormon predicted and rejected the theory of evolution in Alma chapter 30. More on that later in the Latter-Day Saint (LDS) section.

    Here are more issues for which the theory of evolution has no answers:

    Atheists claim that the first life on this earth was a single "first living cell" which formed by accident in a "warm pond." A prebiotic (i.e. pre-life) warm pond would have consisted of nothing but sterile water, sand and rocks.

    How could a "first living cell," with DNA or RNA inside of a complex cell, have been created from nothing but sterile water, sand and rocks? Scientists could not build a cell with DNA or RNA inside in a million years using nothing but sand and rocks. More is said about the first living cell theory in an article linked to below: Is the "First Living Cell" Theory Credible?

    Another topic discussed in an article below is the fact that Natural Selection has absolutely nothing to do with the theory of evolution!! The issue of evolution is not about how animals are DESTROYED by Natural Selection, the issue is how animals are CREATED!!

    Destroying animals after they have been created (by Natural Selection) does not explain how these animals were created!! The issue of evolution is the creation of animals and their DNA, not the destruction of animals by Natural Selection. An article below on Natural Selection is called: Can "Natural Selection" Save The Theory of Evolution?

    Considering all of the species which exist on this earth, and especially the species which have both a male and female; and that for species which have both a male and female, the male and female had to come to exist at about the same time and place on this earth so they could have offspring; and their respective DNA must align in an unbelievably sophisticated way so they could have both male and female offspring; to think that all of the DNA for these many species happened by a series of accidents is ludicrous.


    Summary

    So let us summarize: who has the best evidence for their beliefs: the prophets or the atheists/evolutionists?

    The prophets easily win because of the discovery of DNA!! It is interesting to emphasize that before the discovery of DNA in 1953 the evolutionists would have won the debate because scientists could not differentiate between microevolution and macroevolution. Before the discovery of DNA examples of microevolution were perfectly valid examples of evolution. And that is all Darwin ever observed.

    The truth is that God had to exist long before our sun was created and this planet was prepared for earth life. Our sun is a million times larger than our earth and the star Betelgeuse is a million times larger than our sun!! And there are about 100 billion galaxies. It is quite possible that as telescopes in space get more powerful that many more galaxies will be found.

    The truth is that all species had to have been placed on this earth by God, as the scriptures teach. And who would believe that our sun was created by a series of astronomical accidents??

    So why don't the atheists convert over to believing in God?

    While many atheists have switched over to creation science, many have not. Author and attorney Phillip E. Johnson explains the hidden agenda of the hard-core evolutionists/atheists:

    • "Science [i.e. the scientific establishment] is committed to philosophical naturalism [i.e. atheism] and therefore science must assume that no Creator, and no purposeful intelligence, is behind our existence ... All that science can address is the question of: 'granted that we are here as a result of purposeless material mechanisms, what's the most plausible purposeless material mechanism that we can imagine?'"
      Phillip E. Johnson, professor, author, attorney; quoted on UCTV

    Read that quote two or three times, it is an amazing statement.

    In other words, many in the scientific establishment are atheists, they are too arrogant to admit that a God could exist who is massively smarter than they are, so they do not believe that God exists. Therefore they set as their goal to get converts to atheism. To do this they find: the "most plausible" scientific theory they can invent to get converts to atheism!"

    Of course, the "most plausible" scientific theory they can invent to get converts is the "theory of evolution."

    With the goal in mind to get converts to atheism, the leading atheists use their talents of lies, "spin" and deception to try to get converts to atheism.

    But the fact that the atheists must lie and deceive to get converts should be a clue that there is something very wrong with the theory of evolution!! The atheists know that the truth will not get them any converts so they know they must lie and deceive in order to get converts!!

    The modern theory of evolution exists because of pride, not science. The atheists want people to worship them, not God.

    Many people have been deceived by the clever deceptions of the atheists, and especially their clever definitions. This is nothing to be ashamed of, the atheists are very clever. But the theory of evolution is simply not scientifically viable after the discovery of DNA in 1953.

    The discovery of DNA in 1953 should have been the instant death of the theory of evolution, but the atheists and evolutionists will never cease to create fanciful tales, name calling and above all deceptive definitions to create imaginary "evidence" for the theory of evolution in order to get converts to atheism.

    The theory of evolution today is nothing but a missionary tool for atheists. From a purely scientific standpoint, the discovery of DNA and the sophistication of what goes on inside of cells has converted the theory of evolution into complete scientific nonsense.

    The rest of this page has links to YouTube videos, brief descriptions and links to many technical articles and links to the two free eBooks on this website.


    So Who Got It Right?

    Let us talk about the three theories for how the first parents of the first human babies born on this planet came to exist.

    First, the Bible claims that God created Adam and Eve (I will talk about what Brigham Young said about where God came from in a moment).

    Second, some people claim that humans from another planet, with our intelligence, created the DNA for Adam and Eve. This is not credible if they had our intelligence!! But even if they were smarter than we are, where did THEIR DNA come from? This explanation doesn't explain anything, it just moves the theory of evolution to another planet. This theory also ignores the massive size of space.

    Third, the atheists and evolutionists claim that the DNA for the first human male and first human female came to exist by mindless accidents, which are called "evolution," which started with DNA or RNA for a "first living cell," forming by accident in a warm pond millions of years ago. More about the "first living cell" nonsense below.

    Item #3 describes what is now called the "theory of evolution" and is the primary theory which is challenged on this website. This website has two free eBooks and many free articles which collectively include more than THREE HUNDRED AND FIFTY REASONS the theory of evolution cannot be true. These books also expose some of the clever deceptions of the atheists.

    The atheists and evolutionists want you to believe the theory of evolution, but with the discovery of DNA in 1953, the theory of evolution has become absolute nonsense as this website demonstrates over and over again.

    DNA is a computer program and many other things. Atheists claim that DNA was "written" by totally random processes. Yet no functional computer program on earth has been written by a random number generator (to simulate evolution). So why would anyone believe that the world's two most sophisticated computer programs (male and female human DNA) came to exist by a series of accidents?

    And how would you like to sit in jail until you could RANDOMLY MUTATE the DNA of a male and female Gibbon, or some other non-human primate, until you could create a human DNA strand for both a male and female?

    As this website will show, there is no possible way the sophistication of DNA and cells could have come to exist by a long series of accidents. The two most sophisticated computer programs on earth, male and female DNA, were carefully designed by God!!

    There is really nothing to debate regarding the theory of evolution because the theory of evolution is so absurd mainly due to the discovery of DNA. How could the world's most sophisticated computer programs for many advanced species, male and female DNA, have come to exist by many billions of pure accidents?

    But the evolution debate will never end. Every time the "creation scientists" (those who debate the evolutionists) totally destroy one of the arguments of the evolutionists, the evolutionists just regroup and come up with some new deception. It is like a never-ending game of keep-away.

    I am well aware that it is not "politically correct" to talk about God, but we are talking about science here. "Political correctness" and truth are frequently at war with each other!!

    If God did not exist the truth is that we would not exist!!

    Let's look at this from another perspective. Suppose you were on a hike deep in the forest. Suppose as you came over one hill, and started into a wooded area you saw what looked like a brand new Buick automobile with its headlights on and its hazard lights flashing.

    Would you think that this object was created by an accidental explosion in the forest?

    Remember that an automobile is made of metal, rubber and/or synthetic rubber, plastic, glass and many other things. Could an explosion in the forest, which contains nothing but wood, plants, water and dirt, create an automobile? Of course not.

    And likewise, the "first living cell" on this planet was not made of sterile water, sand and rocks as the evolutionists want you to believe!! No team of scientists on this planet could create a "first living cell," with DNA or RNA inside, from nothing but sterile water, sand and rocks.

    Many scientists have PhD degrees in Cell Biology!!! Cells are not simple.

    So if God exists, where did God come from?


    Where Did God Come From?

    So where did God come from? Brigham Young, who was born in 1801 (Darwin was born in 1809), the second prophet of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (the Mormons), said this about the origin of God:

    • Many have tried to penetrate to the First Cause of all things; but it would be as easy for an ant to number the grains of sand on the earth. It is not for man, with his limited intelligence, to grasp eternity in his comprehension ... It would be as easy for a gnat to trace the history of man back to his origin as for man to fathom the First Cause of all things, lift the veil of eternity, and reveal the mysteries that have been sought after by philosophers from the beginning.

    Since 4000 B.C. the prophets have been saying that God created all things. Modern science, because of the discovery of DNA in 1953, has proven the prophets have been correct all along.

    Darwin, to his credit, had no clue that DNA existed or even that cells existed. Thus Darwin could not tell the difference between macroevolution (i.e. a new species has been created by random accidents) and microevolution (i.e. variety within the same species, such as the difference between a Collie dog and a Great Dane dog and a Chihuahua dog - they are all "dogs").

    Darwin observed microevolution but he could not have known that microevolution has nothing to do with the creation of a new species. It was not until 1953, with the discovery of DNA, that the term "unique species" could be correctly defined to be a "unique DNA structure."

    Macroevolution is a false theory because it is impossible to take a highly complex computer program (i.e. the DNA for a species) and mutate it via random accidents (meaning via evolution) into a NEW AND IMPROVED species.

    • Important Note: It is important to understand that the atheists, such as Richard Dawkins, intentionally obfuscate the terms microevolution and macroevolution in order to get converts. For example, in the book: The Greatest Show On Earth, atheist Richard Dawkins uses example after example of microevolution and claims they are examples of true evolution. The entire book is a giant lie.

    In short, based on what Darwin knew in 1882, when he died, his theory of evolution was correct. It could not be disproven until 1953 when DNA was discovered.

    But since 1830, which was 29 years BEFORE Darwin's first book, the LDS church has been opposed to the theory of evolution. In fact, the LDS church was responsible for the first book to describe Natural Selection and thus evolution, even before Darwin wrote his first book on evolution!!

    However, natural selection does not create ANYTHING!!!!!!! Natural selection only eliminates species which already exist!!!!!!!

    Darwin knew nothing about cells or DNA, thus Darwin had absolutely no clue that plants and animals are created by the computer algorithms on their DNA.

    The Book of Mormon, which was published 29 years before Darwin's first book, predicted and rejected the theory of evolution in Alma chapter 30. More on that later in the Latter-Day Saint (LDS) section.

    A topic discussed in an article below is the fact that Natural Selection has absolutely nothing to do with the theory of evolution!! The issue of evolution is not about how animals are DESTROYED by Natural Selection, the issue is how animals are CREATED!!

    Destroying animals after they have been created (by Natural Selection) does not explain how these animals were created!! The issue of evolution is the creation of animals and their DNA, not the destruction of animals by Natural Selection. An article below on Natural Selection is called: Can "Natural Selection" Save The Theory of Evolution?

    Considering all of the species which exist on this earth, and especially the species which have both a male and female; and that for species which have both a male and female, the male and female had to come to exist at about the same time and place on this earth so they could have offspring; and their respective DNA must align in an unbelievably sophisticated way so they could have both male and female offspring; to think that all of the DNA for these many species happened by a series of accidents is ludicrous.

    HTML File: Here is a list of more than 350 reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true. In each case an item is listed that could not have happened by a series of accidents:
    Word File: Over 350 Reasons The Theory of Evolution Cannot Be True


    Excel File: This is a very similar file but it is in Microsoft Excel format. The file may open as an icon on the bottom-left of your screen - if it does just click the icon:
    Spreadsheet: Over 350 Reasons The Theory of Evolution Cannot Be True


    The Current Evolution Versus Creation Science Debate

    The evolution debate should not be based on the visual forms of plants and animals (i.e. Darwin's phylogentic tree), but rather it should be based on the probability that the DNA of the plants and animals (and the cells the DNA resides in) came to exist PURELY BY CHANCE (i.e. by the totally random process of evolution)!!

    But what massively sophisticated computer program, and human DNA is the most sophisticated computer program on this planet, has ever come to exist by a long series of pure accidents?

    To understand this better, suppose you were a spy and you were told by your country to steal the instructions of how to manufacture a certain kind of automobile. Would you take a photograph of the automobile or would you steal the schematics of the machines in the factory that made the automobile?? Obviously you would steal the schematics of the machines.

    Likewise, debating the theory of evolution by looking at the visual forms of plants and animals is not scientific because it totally misses the root cause of why the plants and animals exist, which is DNA!!

    The fact is that without DNA there would be no plants and no animals.

    To be more specific, plants and animals are created by the computer algorithms which are on the DNA of the plants and animals. So looking at the visual form of a plant and animal is NOT looking at what causes the plant or animal to exist!!

    Needless to say the atheists and evolutionists don't like to talk about DNA or cells, they like to talk about the visual form of each plant and animal so they can tell their stories. They carefully ignore the fact that computer programs in the human world are never written by random number generators, but evolution itself is essentially a random number generator applied to DNA!! Without God there is nothing but total randomness in nature.

    The key question in the evolution debate is this: knowing that the "computer programs" on DNA in nature are vastly more sophisticated than any "human-designed computer program," how could the "computer programs" on DNA, for thousands of species, have been "written" by totally random processes?

    As will be seen many times on this website, when DNA is looked at during the evolution debate, the theory of evolution becomes scientific nonsense. By definition, there is "no intelligence" in the theory of evolution, especially at the DNA level.

    The only "evidence" the evolutionists have for their theory is to ignore DNA and look only at the visual form of plants and animals and then combine the visual form of plants and animals with their exceptional story telling skills.

    Once DNA enters into the evolution debate the theory of evolution quickly collapses because all DNA is a massively sophisticated computer program, even for an ant.

    So let us dig deeper into our discussion of evolution versus creation science by looking at the sophistication of real human DNA, male and female, which are the most sophisticated computer programs on this planet!!


    Adam and Eve

    The theory of evolution must explain where TWO humans came from at the same time, and same location on this planet and their DNA could align together in a very specific way!!! The Bible calls these humans Adam and Eve. The Bible correctly identifies the need for a "first" human couple from which the first human babies and all other humans could descend.

    Adam and Eve could not have been created as infants or they would have starved to death because they could not gather their food. They had to be created as teenagers or adults.

    And their food supply, whether plants or animals, had to be created before they were created!!

    The atheists have no credible theory as to how the parents of the first human baby born on this planet came to exist. The "parents" of the first human baby are defined to be "Adam" and "Eve." How did Adam and Eve get on this planet without being born on this planet? God created them.

    The atheists, of course, need to develop some "theory" as to how the first real human babies were born on this earth. What they claim is that the parents of the first human babies born on this planet were mutants (i.e. they had mutated DNA). In other words, the parents of the first human babies born on this planet were children of bonobos or some other primate.

    This theory is absurd because you cannot take the male DNA of a bonobo and randomly mutate it into male human DNA. Ditto for the females. And these impossible mutations had to happen in the same time period and the same location on this planet.

    Most of DNA is a massively sophisticated computer program and you simply can't create a new and improved computer program by randomly mutating an existing computer program at the object code level or at any other level. It will never work.


    The "Morphing of the Embryo" Algorithms on DNA

    I call the algorithms on the DNA of the fertilized egg, which creates the new baby via billions of cell divisions, the morphing of the embryo algorithms. These algorithms on DNA control the "morphing" of the embryo from a single fertilized egg into a crying baby.

    These algorithms on the DNA of the fertilized egg are incomprehensible in sophistication because they also need to make sure that the 60,000 miles of blood vessels are fully enclosed before blood starts to circulate or else the baby would bleed to death before it was born!!

    Thus, the DNA in the fertilized egg must make sure the cells in the new baby are the
    1) correct types of cells (and there are 200 different types of cells), and
    2) each type of cell must be in the correct locations as the fetus morphs, and
    3) the cells must be created in the correct order.

    As an example of #2, you don't want a million fingernail cells being put in the brain of the developing fetus six weeks after conception or at any other time. The right kinds of cells must be in the right locations at all times.

    As an example of #3, you don't want the brain in the fetus to grow faster than the skull is growing.

    You might wonder where the blood for the baby comes from. It comes from the blood of the mother. Try to figure out how the blood gets from the mother to the baby as the 60 thousand miles of blood vessels are being formed. Good luck.

    The complex process by which blood gets from the mother to the baby could not have "evolved" because it had to work perfectly before the first human baby was born on this planet or else no human baby would ever have been born alive on this planet.

    What controls and keeps track of the morphing of the embryo of a new baby as the morphing is going on? No one has a clue because every cell in the baby has exactly the same DNA. Well, if you want to get technical some red blood cells do not have DNA but that is not relevant to this discussion.


    Amazing Article: "When There Are Sixteen Cells During the Morphing of the Embryo"

    Hold on to your seatbelt, it is not just the computer programs on the DNA that control the "morphing of the embryo" that are incomprehensible, it is the way that the morphing algorithms work!! There is no computer program on this planet that could be designed to work the way the "morphing of the embryo" algorithms work.

    This article traces the "morphing of the embryo" until there are 16 cells in the fetus. This article demonstrates that DNA should not even be called a computer program. In this article you will learn why no team of computer programmers on earth could even begin to replicate the way that DNA works!!!
    Article: When There Are 16 Cells During the Morphing of the Embryo!!


    Permutations of Nucleotides

    A "permutation" is a unique way to order something. For example, two brothers, who are not twins, will have DNA which has many differences. The unique ordering of the nucleotides on the DNA for each brother is called a "permutation."

    So the problem for evolutionists is not only creating a DNA strand, but creating a DNA strand with a viable permutation of nucleotides (meaning a viable ordering of nucleotides) which could create a living and functioning baby.

    For example, if a new baby had an ordering of nucleotides of:
    ACGTACGTACGTACGTACGT...
    the baby with this permutation of nucleotides would not survive because there is no intelligence in this ordering.

    Thus, not only is it impossible for a DNA strand to be created in nature, even if it could be so created, the probability that a viable permutation of nucleotides (i.e. an ordering that could create a viable human baby) could happen by accident is far beyond statistically impossible.

    It would be more absurd than trying to create the object code of a massively sophisticated computer program by randomly choosing millions of '0's and '1's.

    Study the next paragraph carefully:

    Randomly creating a viable permutation of nucleotides, even to create a mouse, by chance, would be far less likely than picking a single correct atom, hidden from among all of the atoms in a trillion Universes!! This is not an exaggeration!! This statement may not be politically correct but it is easily mathematically correct.

    So the issues are not just the creation of the cells and the creation of the DNA inside the cells, but a far bigger issue is obtaining a viable permutation for both a male and female (Adam and Eve) that just happen to align with each other such that they can have children who in turn can have children of their own, etc., all the way to you!!!


    The Universe

    Let's briefly mention another issue - the Universe. Astronomers believe there are between 100 billion and 200 billion GALAXIES in the Universe.

    Our sun is just one of the stars in our Galaxy and our sun is a million times larger than our earth.

    The star Betelgeuse has a radius 950-1,200 times the size of our Sun. But the star VY Canis Majoris, a red hypergiant star in the Canis Major constellation, is thought to be 1,540 times the size of our Sun.

    If VY Canis Majoris replaced our Sun its size would extend beyond the orbit of Saturn and we would be inside the sun.

    The galaxy we live in, called the Milky Way Galaxy, has up to 400 billion stars. The Milky Way Galaxy is in the Laniakea Supercluster of galaxies. In other words, there are many galaxies.

    As telescopes in space get bigger and bigger more and more stars and more and more galaxies will be discovered.

    Can you imagine what a telescope, with the light-gathering power of the width of our earth, would find!!??

    Of course the atheists have to invent a story to claim that our Universe was created by an accident. So they claim there was a giant explosion called the Big Bang which created the Universe. Oh good grief, who would believe our Universe was created by an accidental explosion? If there was a "Big Bang" it was a project of God.

    The truth is that God had to exist long before our sun was created and this planet was prepared for earth life. So people naturally want to know where God came from!!

    Brigham Young, who was born in 1801 (Darwin was born in 1809), the second prophet of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (the Mormons), said this about the first cause of all things (i.e. where God came from):

    • Many have tried to penetrate to the First Cause of all things; but it would be as easy for an ant to number the grains of sand on the earth. It is not for man, with his limited intelligence, to grasp eternity in his comprehension ... It would be as easy for a gnat to trace the history of man back to his origin as for man to fathom the First Cause of all things, lift the veil of eternity, and reveal the mysteries that have been sought after by philosophers from the beginning.

    In other words, there was a "First Cause" of all things - a beginning - but this beginning happened so long ago, and so many trillions or quadrillions of things have happened since then, that these events are far beyond human comprehension.

    While Brigham Young did not know very much about the Universe in his day, he did understand the principle that the "first cause of all things" is far beyond human comprehension.

    • "I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use."
      Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)


    The "First Living Cell"

    Let us expand on the concept of a "first living cell."

    As mentioned above a prebiotic (i.e. pre-life) warm pond would have consisted of nothing but sterile water (which had never had life in it by context), sand and rocks.

    How could a "first living cell," with DNA or RNA inside of a complex cell, have been created from nothing but sterile water, sand and rocks?

    In fact, all of the scientists in the world, in a million years, could not create a living cell, with DNA or RNA inside, using nothing but sterile water, sand and rocks. Scientists have never created life from non-life and they certainly could not do it using nothing but sterile water, sand and rocks.

    To think that any DNA or RNA came to exist by chance is nonsense.

    But there are many other issues, such as how could a single-cell suddenly obtain the complex mechanisms to divide into two cells? And how could the organelles of the original cell be "copied" so that there would be two sets of organelles, one in each cell?

    Could you take a photocopy of an automobile and then drive away in the copy? That is essentially what Mother Nature does as a cell divides.

    Cells must be able to adapt to inflammation, dehydration, starvation, water saturation, cancer, the wide variety of foods we eat, etc.

    Many books have been written on cell biology (if you count PhD dissertations).

    This article goes into depth about the absurdity of the claims of the "first living cell" theory:
    Article: Is The "First Living Cell" Theory Credible?


    More Deceptions Of The Atheists

    Since 4000 B.C. the prophets have been saying that God created all things. Modern science, because of the discovery of DNA in 1953, has proven the prophets have been correct all along.

    Darwin, to his credit, had no clue that DNA existed or even that cells existed. Thus Darwin could not tell the difference between macroevolution (i.e. a new species has been created by random accidents) and microevolution (i.e. variety within the same species, such as the difference between a Collie dog and a Great Dane dog and a Chihuahua dog - they are all "dogs" and have exactly the same DNA structure).

    Darwin observed microevolution but he could not have known that microevolution has nothing to do with the creation of a new species. It was not until 1953, with the discovery of DNA, that the term "unique species" could be correctly defined to be a "unique DNA structure."

    A dog and a cat are different species precisely because their DNA has a different structure!!

    Evolution must claim that the DNA structure of one "species" can be randomly mutated into the DNA structure of a new and improved "species." But this is literally like claiming a new and improved computer program could be created by randomly making changes to the binary code of another computer program.

    Of course the evolutionists know this is impossible so they use another tactic to deceive people. They claim that there is no difference between microevolution and macroevolution. By doing this they can use examples from microevolution and claim they are true examples of "evolution."

    Macroevolution is a false theory because it is impossible to take a highly complex computer program (i.e. the DNA for a species) and mutate it via random accidents (meaning via evolution) into a NEW AND IMPROVED species with a new and improved DNA strand.

    But the atheists, such as Richard Dawkins, intentionally obfuscate the terms microevolution and macroevolution in order to get converts. For example, in the book: The Greatest Show On Earth, atheist Richard Dawkins uses example after example of microevolution and claims they are examples of true evolution, which is macroevolution. The entire book is a giant lie because there has never been a proven example of macroevolution.

    In short, in 1882, when Darwin died, his theory of evolution was correct BASED ON WHAT DARWIN KNEW AT THE TIME. It could not be disproven until 1953 when DNA was discovered.

    But since 1830, which was 29 years BEFORE Darwin's first book, the Latter-Day Saint church (i.e. LDS or Mormons) has been opposed to the theory of evolution. In fact, the LDS church was responsible for the first book to describe Natural Selection and thus evolution, even before Darwin wrote his first book on evolution!!

    The Book of Mormon predicted and rejected the theory of evolution in Alma chapter 30. More on that later in the Latter-Day Saint section.

    Another topic discussed in an article below is the fact that Natural Selection has absolutely nothing to do with the theory of evolution!! The issue of evolution is not about how animals are DESTROYED by Natural Selection, the issue is how animals are CREATED!!

    Destroying animals after they have been created (by Natural Selection) does not explain how these animals were created!! The issue of evolution is the creation of animals and their DNA, not the destruction of animals by Natural Selection. An article below on Natural Selection is called: Can "Natural Selection" Save The Theory of Evolution?

    Considering all of the species which exist on this earth, and especially the species which have both a male and female (e.g. humans and deer and turtles); and that for species which have both a male and female, the male and female had to come to exist at about the same time and place on this earth so they could have offspring; and their respective DNA must align in an unbelievably sophisticated way so they could have both male and female offspring; to think that all of the DNA for these many species happened by a series of accidents is ludicrous.

    For example, turtles aren't real fast and most of them aren't real big, so how did the first male turtle and first female turtle find each other on this gigantic planet of ours (gigantic from their perspective)? God probably put a few thousand pairs of turtles on this planet.


    The "Hidden Agenda" of the Atheists

    So let us summarize: who has the best evidence for their beliefs: the prophets or the atheists/evolutionists?

    The prophets easily win because of the discovery of DNA and modern astronomy!! It is interesting to emphasize that before the discovery of DNA in 1953 the evolutionists would have won the debate because scientists could not differentiate between microevolution and macroevolution. Before the discovery of DNA examples of microevolution were perfectly valid examples of evolution. And that is all Darwin ever observed.

    The truth is that all species had to have been placed on this earth by God, as the scriptures teach. And who would believe that our sun was created by a series of astronomical accidents??

    So why don't the atheists convert over to believing in God?

    While many atheists have switched over to creation science, many have not. Author and attorney Phillip E. Johnson explains the hidden agenda of the hard-core evolutionists/atheists:

    • "Science [i.e. the scientific establishment] is committed to philosophical naturalism [i.e. atheism] and therefore science must assume that no Creator, and no purposeful intelligence, is behind our existence ... All that science can address is the question of: 'granted that we are here as a result of purposeless material mechanisms, what's the most plausible purposeless material mechanism that we can imagine?'"
      Phillip E. Johnson, professor, author, attorney; quoted on UCTV

    Read that quote two or three times, it is an amazing statement.

    In other words, some people in the scientific establishment want their students to worship them, not God. So they set as their goal to get converts to atheism. To do this they find: the "most plausible" scientific theory they can invent to get converts to atheism!"

    Of course, the "most plausible" scientific theory they can invent to get converts is the "theory of evolution."

    With the goal in mind to get converts to atheism, the leading atheists use their talents of lies, "spin" and deception to try to get converts to atheism.

    But the fact that the atheists must lie and deceive to get converts should be a clue that there is something very wrong with the theory of evolution!! The atheists know that the truth will not get them any converts so they know they must lie and deceive in order to get converts!!

    The modern theory of evolution exists because of pride, not science. The atheists want people to worship them, not God.

    But even some people who believe in God also believe in the theory of evolution. They may think that God directed evolution. But the pure atheists dominate the evolution debate so you rarely hear someone say that God directed evolution.

    Many people have been deceived by the clever deceptions of the atheists, and especially their clever definitions. This is nothing to be ashamed of, the atheists are very clever. But the theory of evolution is simply not scientifically viable after the discovery of DNA in 1953.

    The discovery of DNA in 1953 should have been the instant death of the theory of evolution, but the atheists and evolutionists will never cease to create fanciful tales, name calling and above all deceptive definitions to create imaginary "evidence" for the theory of evolution in order to get converts to atheism.

    The theory of evolution today is nothing but a missionary tool for atheists. From a purely scientific standpoint, the discovery of DNA and the sophistication of what goes on inside of cells has converted the theory of evolution into complete scientific nonsense.

    The rest of this page has links to YouTube videos, brief descriptions and links to several technical articles and links to the two free eBooks on this website.


    The Morphing of the Embryo Algorithms on DNA (and a YouTube Video)

    The "morphing of the embryo" algorithms on DNA may occupy 97% of human DNA. They are essentially computer programs that control how a single fertilized egg becomes a new human baby with about 30 billion complex cells each of which must end up in just the right place at just the right time and have the correct genes activated!!

    As you watch this video remember that a human being starts out as a single cell with a single DNA strand (the fertilized egg).

    This incredible 9 1/2 minute video graphically shows the "morphing of the embryo" of a human baby, which is controlled by DNA:
    YouTube Video: "From Conception to Birth" (i.e. the "Morphing of the Embryo")

    The video mentions that at 4 weeks, 1 million cells a second are being made and at birth a newborn baby has 60,000 miles of blood vessels. This process must be incomprehensible in complexity because if these blood vessels were not fully enclosed, as already mentioned, before blood started to circulate in the fetus, the fetus would bleed to death!!

    How could evolution ever accidentally create that level of sophistication?? If a new species was not able to enclose all of the thousands of miles of blood vessels before the blood started to circulate, every baby of that species would die and the species would immediately die off.

    As if that weren't incredible enough, the instructions for the morphing of the embryo come from inside the cells, where the DNA is!! Cells divide from the inside-out. And remember each cell has exactly the same DNA, yet each of the 30 billion cells ends up in a unique location in the baby with a specific set of genes activated.

    Is there any wonder why hundreds of scientists now consider the theory of evolution to be complete nonsense coupled with "wishful thinking" on the part of atheists and evolutionists?

    But the atheists know the theory of evolution is nonsense, so they have developed a set of very clever deceptive definitions to generate completely bogus "evidence" for the theory of evolution.

    The theory of evolution may be a great recruiting tool for atheists, but from a scientific perspective it is obsolete and pure mythology.

    Many people don't want to hear the truth because they are interested in popularity, but the solid truth is that God had to put Adam and Eve on this planet, with their DNA, so that the "first child" could be born!!

    This website contains two free eBooks and several articles which have no hesitation in stating that new discoveries about DNA, cell biology, anatomy, astronomy and other scientific disciplines overwhelmingly prove the theory of evolution cannot be true!!!


    Article: The Complexity of Cells (and 3 YouTube Videos)

    There is human DNA inside of every cell (except some red blood cells), but human DNA is not the only highly sophisticated object inside the cells. There are many other complex objects, some of which were created by the genes on the DNA. Cells are unbelievably complex!!

    I own a book on Cell Biology called Essential Cell Biology, Third Edition, by Alberts, Bray, Hopkin, Johnson, Lewis, Raff, Roberts and Walter. It is a large book with 731 pages!! A section header on page 410 reads: Transmitter-gated Channels in Target Cells Convert Chemical Signals Into Electrical Signals." This is not something you read in the comic section of the newspaper.

    Cells could not have been created by a series of accidents!!

    For more information about the complexity of cells, see this article:
    Article: The Complexity of Cells (Includes 3 YouTube Videos!!)


    Article: Could a Simple Cell Exist?

    Evolutionists understand the problems with creating a human cell from scratch, so they claim that the "first living cell" was a simple cell and that numerous increasingly complex types of cells "evolved" between the "first living cell" and human cells.

    First of all, there are no "simple cells." Even the simplest cell on this earth has DNA (except for some red blood cells, however, there is no way these red blood cells can divide!!) and inside each cell is also an incredible, miniature factory.

    For more information about whether a simple cell could exist, see this article:
    Article: Could A Simple Cell Exist?


    Can Evolution Create A New Species From Old Species??

    Many atheists and evolutionists claim that the incomprehensible sophistication of human DNA was created by a series of accidents to the DNA of a previously existing pair of animals, such as a male and female bonobo.

    They claim that the DNA of one species with both a male and female (e.g. a bonobo) were randomly mutated (male and female) to create DNA for a human male and a human female. Such a claim is absurd in the extreme!! Yet it is at the core of the theory of evolution after the discovery of DNA!!

    First of all, the mutations to the male and female bonobo had to happen in the same location on earth and in the same timeframe so the new male and female humans could mate.

    DNA is a computer program, even for a bonobo. So how could the DNA (i.e. computer program) for a male bonobo and the DNA (i.e. computer program) for a female bonobo be randomly mutated into far more sophisticated computer programs for a human male DNA and female DNA??

    Why would anyone make such an absurd claim??

    It is as absurd as claiming a person could take the "object code" of a massively sophisticated computer program which can control the traffic in a city of 100,000 people and randomly mutate the "object code" of that computer program and end up with a far more sophisticated computer program that can control the automobile traffic in a city of 1,000,000 people plus control the air traffic at a giant airport.

    No sophisticated computer program has ever been written by randomly mutating the object code of a significantly lesser computer program.

    Yet that is the very core of the theory of evolution after the discovery of DNA!!!


    Article: Can "Natural Selection" Save The Theory of Evolution?

    Evolutionists claim that "Natural Selection" will save the theory of evolution!! Natural Selection is considered the "engine that drives evolution." It is the hero of Darwinism.

    However, Natural Selection has nothing to do with creating anything. No new species of plant or animal was ever CREATED by Natural Selection!!

    Natural Selection can only DESTROY animals after they have already been created.

    This article will go into great detail about why Natural Selection has absolutely nothing to do with evolution:
    Article: Can Natural Selection Save The Theory of Evolution?


    What is Life?

    Let us look at the issue: "what is life?" For example, if you took a fish and left it out of the water until it died, and then put it back into the water, why doesn't it come back to life? All of the raw elements for life are still in the fish, so why doesn't it come back to life? There is something more to "life" than just cells and oxygen and water.

    Furthermore, have the evolutionists and atheists ever proven that life can be created from non-life (i.e. inorganic materials)?? Never, never, never - yet they continue to preach atheism.

    While several attempts have been made to create life from non-life (e.g. Miller-Uray, Wong and Hartgerink), the scientists have not only failed to create life, they have also failed to prove it can be done. They cannot create a DNA strand from inorganic material, much less a DNA strand with a viable permutation of nucleotides for life which is inside of a cell!!

    For example, have scientists put a large shell over a pond, which had no life, meaning there was no DNA and no cells (this simulates "prebiotic," meaning "existing before life"), and observed "life" form by a series of accidents, including RNA or DNA inside of a "first living cell" (in that pond), that was alive and had the ability to divide itself into two cells (which would be required for life to continue)?

    Never!!

    Then what is their evidence for evolution? Their only evidence is that many scientists do not believe in God and thus they have no choice except to use their God-given brains to deceive people into believing that everything in the Universe, including human DNA, occurred by chance.

    But the theory of evolution should have been thrown in the trash can when DNA was discovered and when the complexity of cells was also discovered. Yet, as scientists learn more and more about DNA and cells, the atheists continue to cling to the theory of evolution as if it were still 1859, when Darwin's first book was published.

    The only thing that is "evolving" on this planet is the theory of evolution as evolutionists/atheists constantly need to develop new spin to account for the new discoveries about the sophistication of cells, the morphing of the embryo algorithms on DNA, etc.


    Article: Comparing DNA to Computer Programs

    Ponder this carefully: every one of the millions of complex, or even moderately complex, computer programs on this planet was written by human beings. NONE OF THEM were written by random number generators to simulate the way that evolution must work!!! Every computer program has been written by intelligent human beings who studied computer languages and programming!!

    This article logically looks at why DNA could not have come to exist by chance:
    Article: Comparing DNA to Computer Programs


    Article: Why Do We Need Computer Programmers??

    The DNA for many thousands of different species are vastly superior to any computer program written by any team of computer programmers!!

    So if randomness (i.e. evolution) created all of the most sophisticated computer programs on earth (i.e. DNA) then randomness should also be able to design the far, far less sophisticated computer programs used by businesses, the military, individuals, etc.

    This article provides another viewpoint to the evolution debate:
    Article: Why Do We Need Computer Programmers?


    Can Accidents Or Simplicity Create Complexity?

    As one example of complexity, the human eyes are unbelievable in complexity. Yet the sections on human DNA which create the human eyes must be far more complex than the eyes themselves!! And the intelligence who designed the DNA (God) must be far more complex than the DNA itself!!

    In other words, simplicity never creates complexity. To understand these concepts, consider these items:

    First, consider that a human-designed computer program exists because of the human intelligence to write the computer program, the human intelligence to write the computer language, the human intelligence to write the computer language compiler, the human intelligence to design and build the microprocessor, including designing and building the memory chips, etc.

    Second, consider the output of the computer program which is printed on a piece of paper.

    How can the printout on the piece of paper be more sophisticated than the human intelligence needed to write the computer program, to write the computer language, etc.?? It can't!!

    Let's think about the memory chips. I have a son who works for a company that makes memory chips. At times he is sitting in a very large room by himself, with several billion dollars worth of equipment needed to make memory chips!!

    The memory chips cannot be more complex than the machines that made them, and the machines that made them cannot be more complex than the humans who designed them!!

    Simplicity cannot create complexity!!

    Consider the sophistication of DNA such that it creates a person's brain. Let us think about a pianist.

    A pianist must be able to convert thousands on dots on a sheet of music into the movements of their fingers!! To do this the DNA must create the nerves between their eyes and their brain, have the brain process these dots and then the brain controls their fingers. And the DNA must create the muscles on their fingers, etc.

    If all of this is in place, and with thousands of hours of practice, a pianist can play the Rachmaninoff Piano Concerto #3!!

    What created our DNA, which in turn created our brain, had to be far, far smarter than our DNA and our brain!!!

    That would be God.

    Accidents (i.e. evolution) have zero intelligence so how could it create something with intelligence? It can't!! Intelligence is a top-down process and someone a lot smarter than humans had to design the DNA of every one of the thousand-plus species on this planet.


    The Need For Deceptive Definitions

    The atheists, and many other evolutionists, know the problems with creating the "first living cell," human DNA, human cells, etc. So what some atheists have done is develop new tools of deception to continue to get converts to atheism.

    Their tools of deception frequently revolve around deceptive definitions.

    Three of the key terms, which involve deceptive definitions, are: "species," "microevolution" and "macroevolution."

    While there are valid definitions for these three terms, the atheists have come up with their own definitions.

    Their deceptive definitions for these three terms are so sophisticated, so deceptive and so clever that it takes seven chapters (chapters 10-16) in my free Patterns of Intelligence book, linked to below, to unravel them!! I also have a short article on deceptive definitions called: "Why the Confusion About Evolution?" which is linked to below.

    But for a quick overview, let us talk about the term "species." With the discovery of DNA the definition of "species" should be: A "unique species" is defined by a "unique DNA structure."

    Duh.

    But if the evolutionists defined a "unique species" to be a "unique DNA structure" there would be zero scientific evidence for the theory of evolution!! Scientists have never, never proven a new DNA structure has been created from scratch or from the DNA of a previously existing species!!

    So some atheists have developed various deceptive definitions for the term "species."

    For example, to generate "evidence" for evolution they use every excuse in the world for not being able to come up with a credible definition of the term "species!!" Instead of using DNA, they define the term "species" by talking about typology (i.e. grouping species by how similar they look to the observer) or phylogeny (i.e. the phylogenetic tree of Darwin)!!

    Why not use a "unique DNA structure" to define a "unique species?" Because that would destroy the theory of evolution overnight.

    Whenever you see any "evidence" for the theory of evolution, it is based on very bad science and/or highly deceptive definitions. The theory of evolution is so blatantly absurd (because of the discovery of DNA and the complexity of cells) that the atheists have no choice except to use multiple forms of deception.


    Article: What Did Darwin Know?

    Charles Darwin knew nothing about cells and he knew nothing about the DNA inside of those cells. In fact, based on what scientists knew in Darwin's day, the data that Darwin had access to fully supported his theory of evolution!! It was not until 1953, with the discovery of DNA, that Darwin's theories could be disproven!!

    This article is actually in defense of Darwin based on what scientists knew in his day!!
    Article: What Did Darwin Know?


    A Summary and Overview Of Some Key Issues

    If scientists are so smart, and believe that God does not exist, can they create a Universe with a planet like Earth that has thousands of species, many of which have both a male and female? Let's think about it.

    What is the difference between "creating" a brand new Buick versus "destroying" a brand new Buick by driving it over a cliff??

    The difference is that the new Buick being driven off the cliff must have been created before it was driven over a cliff.

    How does driving a Buick over a cliff help explain how the Buick got created in the first place?? It doesn't.

    So how does finding the remains of an extinct animal (i.e. its fossil) tell us how it was created?? It doesn't. All it tells us is that this animal used to be alive, but now it is dead.

    An animal must be alive before it is dead. A fossil does not tell us how an animal was created, it only tells us that the animal is dead.

    But even extinct animals had to have DNA and their DNA had to create them either from an enclosed egg (e.g. a chicken egg) or a fertilized egg (e.g. humans or monkeys).

    Every animal on this planet, including humans, came from a single DNA strand which was inside of an egg. Whether they came from an enclosed egg (i.e. a chicken egg) or a single fertilized egg in a mother, the animal (including humans) came from a single object and then morphed over time into what it was when it was young and eventually died.

    So the evolution debate is not about where bones came from, it is about where DNA came from. How did so many thousands of "morphing of the embryo" algorithms come to exist for thousands of complex species, especially when there is a male and female in the species?

    The evolution debate is therefore about statistics. There are so many past and present highly sophisticated DNA strands for both extinct and living animals that the theory of evolution has become ludicrous.

    If you think scientists could make a DNA strand from scratch (even ignoring the permutation issues for a moment) read this article and study the image at the top of this article (the right hand image is the axis of a DNA strand):
    Image of DNA Double Helix (Right Image - Click Image to Magnify!!)

    Do you really think DNA was created by a series of accidents??

    But it is not just about the creation of DNA, it is also about viable permutations of nucleotides on DNA. Even if DNA could be built, the probability it has a viable permutation to create an animal from a single cell is mathematically insane.

    It is far beyond the scope of this home page to talk about many subjects. But trust me: the probability of a viable permutation of nucleotides, to create both a male and female for a single advanced species (the permutation of nucleotides on the DNA would have to be almost perfect in order to perform the morphing of the embryo for both a male and female offspring), etc. is so ludicrous it could not happen a single time in the estimated age of this Universe or a billion consecutive Universes.

    In summary, here are just a few reasons evolution (i.e. accidents) could never have created human beings:
    1) Creating DNA from scratch (e.g. for the "first living cell") is impossible for many reasons (humans still cannot do it),
    2) Creating a cell from scratch, by accident, is impossible for many reasons (the inside of a cell is like a small city) (humans cannot do it),
    3) Creating life from non-life is impossible and has never been done (though it has been attempted),
    4) Creating the mechanisms in the cell, which use the DNA as patterns to create proteins, is impossible to happen by accident. For example, how does this mechanism know WHERE on the DNA a specific protein code is located? Only 3% of DNA is coded for proteins (the "WHERE" issue is a topic by itself),
    5) Obtaining a viable permutation of nucleotides on DNA, that could create a human baby, is statistically impossible. It would be far more likely to pick a single atom which is hidden among many, many quadrillions of Universes. This is NOT an exaggeration!!
    6) And so on.

    But even if scientists could create a cell from scratch, would their "new cell" be alive? The answer is 'no' because scientists don't have a clue what "life" really is.

    So how did evolution create a living cell, with DNA or RNA inside, with a viable permutation, with the mechanisms to use the DNA patterns, by pure accident?? Accidents don't create intelligence, just ask any computer programmer how long it would take to write a complex computer program using code written exclusively by random number generators. It would never happen.

    So if humans cannot design and create from scratch DNA or RNA, plus a cell for the DNA or RNA to exist inside, and give their new cell "life," with a viable permutation of nucleotides, why would anyone believe that a series of pure accidents (i.e. evolution) could have created the "first living cell" in a sterile pond?

    How about our Universe? How do the atheists explain how our Universe came to exist? They claim that a single point in space "exploded" and created our Universe which has many millions of galaxies which are arranged in clusters and superclusters of galaxies!! This is the "Big Bang" singularity nonsense.

    If there was a "Big Bang" is was designed and exploded by God.

    The atheists and evolutionists are great story tellers but they are complete dolts at having a credible explanation of where everything came from.


    The Evolution Debate

    While there are more than 250 books which are favorable to the theory of evolution there are also more than 250 books which are strongly critical of the theory of evolution!!

    Those who are critical of the theory of evolution are called "creation scientists" or "creationists" because they believe the scientific data favors a "Creator" of the Universe.

    For example, where did the massive amount of energy needed for the Big Bang come from, assuming it ever happened? And why was this energy clustered in one location? And what was it that "exploded" and where did that object come from? The accidental "Big Bang" theory is nonsense and is in total violation of the First Law of Thermodynamics which states that energy can neither be created nor destroyed.

    Only in the fantasyland of the theory of evolution could a single object (or no object at all) accidentally explode to create millions of galaxies and then billions of years later accidentally create the earth and human DNA, the most sophisticated object on earth.

    But God does not need to use deceptions and lies to get followers. Just look at the night sky!! The stars and galaxies and galaxy clusters and superclusters were not created by accident (i.e. the Big Bang), as atheists want you to believe, they were created by God.

    Yet every time there is a new discovery about the sophistication of DNA, human cells, anatomy, astronomy, etc. the evolutionists, most of whom are atheists, come up with some new spin so they can claim that what was discovered came to exist by accident so they can assign the discovery to the theory of evolution!!

    In fact, it doesn't matter how absurd the theory of evolution is because the theory of evolution is such a good recruiting tool for atheism. Because arrogant atheists dominate the scientific establishment and thus the scientific journals, the theory of evolution is not going away any time soon no matter how absurd it is after the discovery of DNA!!

    In fact, if you want to get published in a leading biology journal you better be an atheist and your article better support the theory of evolution. If it does not praise evolution your article will end up in the trash can, not in a "science" journal.

    From the incomprehensible sophistication of DNA, to the amazing complexity of cells, to the earth we live on, to the ends of the Milky Way Galaxy, to the furthest galaxy cluster and supercluster (by the way, the supercluster we live in is called the Laniakea Supercluster), and considering the "constants" in physics (e.g. the gravitational constant); the credibility of the theory of evolution has dropped to ABSOLUTE ZERO!!!

    So who wins, the prophets or the atheists/evolutionists? Clearly the prophets win!! Because of the discovery of DNA in 1953, and many other things, the theory of evolution has become scientific nonsense!!!


    Genes and Evolution (Advanced)

    Here is another problem evolutionists have in defending the theory of evolution. There are about 20,000 genes on human DNA. Each must be "expressed" (i.e. turned on) or "not expressed" (i.e. turned off). The information to turn a gene on or off, for each cell, must come from within that cell.

    But every cell has the same DNA!! So why do different cells have different combinations of genes turned on or off??

    Multiply 20,000 genes (which are expressed differently in different types of cells), by 30 billion cells in a newborn baby and the resulting number is far larger than the 3.2 billion nucleotides on DNA. The number is 600 trillion genes!!

    This means that for each nucleotide on the DNA strand (and every cell has the same DNA strand), there are 187,500 genes (600 trillion genes divided by 3.2 billion nucleotides) which need to be expressed or not expressed!!

    In other words, 600 trillion genes, in the cells of the newborn baby, need to know whether to be activated/expressed or not. But there are only 3.2 billion nucleotides on the DNA in each cell to tell them whether to be expressed or not expressed and each cell has exactly the same DNA!!

    How does the DNA in each cell know which genes to activate for that cell as the baby is growing from a single fertilized egg and the cells are dividing??

    Remember, a human being starts out as one cell (the fertilized egg) which has a single DNA strand with 3.2 billion nucleotides on it and then this cell starts dividing. Every cell in a human being has exactly the same DNA.

    No new information can be added during the morphing of the embryo process because nothing from outside the new baby is integrated into the baby other than milk and food.

    So how can each nucleotide on DNA, which has one of four states (A, C, G or T) control the expression of 187,500 genes?? It can't!! And remember, the DNA also needs the information to control the morphing of the embryo!!

    There is simply not enough information on DNA to control all of the activities that are going on as the baby is being created!!

    And even if there was enough information via compression algorithms, the algorithms on DNA would have to be so sophisticated and incomprehensible that they could not have come to exist by a series of accidents!!

    Why don't most biology textbooks talk about these and many other problems with the theory of evolution? Because they want to pretend the theory of evolution is true!!


    Evolution After The "First Living Cell"

    Evolutionists claim that the DNA of the first human male and the DNA of the first human female "evolved" independently over millions of years, from the same "first living cell," by a series of accidents called "evolution"!!!

    How did the DNA of the first human father and the DNA of the first human mother "evolve" together from the "first living cell?" How was their DNA synchronized, species after slightly improved species, as the DNA of the males and females evolved independently for millions of years??

    Here is the problem, suppose the male DNA evolved slightly faster than the female DNA evolved. Within thousands of years their DNA would not align and they would not have been able to have any children that survived because their DNA was not compatible!!

    Male DNA and female DNA had to be designed by the same person at the same time - God. Evolution could never have designed two massively sophisticated computer programs (DNA) that could be integrated together to create a third computer program (a baby). And evolution certainly could not have done it in the same time-frame and same locations on the earth.

    Yet the atheists claim that evolution created male and female DNA for many species that have both a male and female. They must claim the male and female DNA "evolved" over the same time period (so they could mate as they slowly evolved over many generations) and they had to live in the same geographical area (also required so they could mate).

    But the truth is that it does not matter what is discovered in cell biology, DNA analysis, etc. because no matter what is discovered, the theory of evolution will be given credit for it by the atheists!!

    The evolution debate is not about science, it is about God. If you assume God does not exist, or if you believe God does not exist, you will likely believe in the theory of evolution no matter how absurd it is.

    The theory of evolution is the story-telling of the atheists to get converts and stroke their pride.

    Many people who believe in God have been tricked into believing in evolution. In fact, that is the precise purpose of the highly sophisticated deceptions of the theory of evolution (and I have only talked about a few of their deceptions) and why it is taught in most schools, but not all schools. In some schools, "creation science" or "intelligent design" is taught and in other schools there are disclaimers about evolution.

    Biology is no longer about science, it is about creative thinking as to how every discovery can be attributed to the theory of evolution in order to get more converts to atheism.

    But as the two free eBooks and articles on this website demonstrate, the theory of evolution is nothing but the clever deceptions of the atheists.


    Chapter Summary Medium-size eBook (37 pages, pdf file): Patterns of Intelligence - Chapter Summary

    If you want a quick, high level overview of the Patterns of Intelligence book, this article has a short summary of each chapter in the 266 page medium-size this book:
    Summary: Patterns of Intelligence - Chapter Summary Only


    Technical Medium-size eBook (266 pages, pdf file): Patterns of Intelligence

    While the large book on this website is the "B-2 Bomber" of anti-evolution books, this book is the "F-22 Raptor" of anti-evolution books. This free book is actually much more current on the issues of the great scientific deceptions which are going on and the mathematical reasons evolution cannot be true. However, it does not go into the depth of the long book on the mathematical reasons evolution cannot be true.

    Did you know that if you listed all major LDS doctrines (i.e. Latter-Day Saint or Mormon) and then took the opposite of each of these doctrines you would end up with the theory of evolution doctrines!! This book will produce such a detailed list in Chapter 2.

    In this book you will see one of the main arguments of the large book, called "Patterns of Intelligence." This eBook has some really cool graphs.

    But there are many things in the medium size book which are not in the large book. For example, chapters 22 and 23 of this book contain an amazing discussion which demonstrates that there is no where near enough information on DNA to control the "morphing of the embryo" algorithms!! Either God Himself designed DNA (and we cannot even remotely understand it) or the morphing of the embryo has help from the other side of the veil. There is no other option!!

    Here is a link to the medium-sized book in one file. As always, you are welcome to read it online, download it, or print it out:
    Free eBook: Patterns of Intelligence (pdf file)

    Here is a link to the individual chapters in the medium-sized book. Each chapter is a file so it is easy to focus on one chapter at a time:
    Free eBook: Patterns of Intelligence (pdf file for each chapter)


    Technical Long eBook (407 pages, pdf file): Prophets or Evolution - An LDS Perspective

    This book is the "B-2 Bomber" of anti-evolution books. It demolishes the theory of evolution time after time and takes no enemies. The discovery of DNA has created an avalanche of ways to prove the theory of evolution is scientific nonsense.

    This free eBook is available in both HTML and PDF formats and both versions can be looked at online or can be downloaded. For example, you can download the PDF version and print it out so you can mark it up. As always, you don't even need to tell me you downloaded it!!

    The long eBook is called "Prophets or Evolution - An LDS Perspective," which:
    1) Compares the doctrines of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (i.e. LDS church) to the theory of evolution (chapters 1-12),
    2) Details many of the massive scientific problems with the theory of evolution (chapters 13-36).

    The book in HTML format (by chapter):
    Free eBook: Prophets or Evolution - An LDS Perspective (html version)

    A printable version of the entire book (407 pages) is available in pdf format and can be read or downloaded from this link. It can also be printed out:
    Free eBook: Prophets Or Evolution - An LDS Perspective (pdf file)


    A Chapter of the Long Book: "Seven Scientific Reasons ... Evolution Cannot be True"

    The complete "Prophets or Evolution" book is over 400 pages. This is a link to one of the key chapters in the main eBook. This chapter is a high level overview of seven of the main scientific reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true. It also mentions seven other reasons evolution cannot be true. Here is a link to this chapter:
    Chapter: Seven Scientific Reasons the Theory of Evolution Cannot be True


    Other Anti-Evolution Books

    If you listen to the propaganda of the pro-evolution monopoly you might think that anyone who believes in creation science is a dolt. Nothing could be further from the truth. There are many "creation scientists" (i.e. those who believe God created this Universe) who are brilliant and have no problems seeing through the false science generated by the scientific establishment.

    In fact, many anti-evolution books have been written by brilliant scientists. This listing of anti-evolution books and DVDs contains only a small sampling of the anti-evolution books which exist in print. In fact, there are more than 200 anti-evolution books.

    Many of the books were written by PhDs in the sciences. The arguments in these books totally shred the theory of evolution from a scientific standpoint.

    Some of these books may be out of print and you may have to use a book finder, such as Alibris, to find them.

    Here is a link to this appendix:
    Appendix: Books and Movies Against the Theory of Evolution



    Additional Section For Latter-Day Saints (LDS or Mormon) And/Or The General Public

    NOTE: Not all links below are to this website.



    Article: The First Book To Describe Evolution Was NOT Written By Darwin!!!

    What was the first book on this planet to describe the theory of evolution?

    Hint: the first book to describe the theory of evolution was not written by Darwin!!

    The first book to describe the theory of evolution was the Book of Mormon, which was published in 1830, which was 29 years before Darwin wrote his first book. It was obviously not a prophet who taught these doctrines, in Alma chapter 30, it was an "anti-Christ" who was taught his doctrines by a personal appearance of the devil. His name was Korihor (see Alma 30 in the Book of Mormon).

    Korihor had several unique characteristics:
    1) He was taught his doctrines by a personal appearance of the devil,
    2) He taught there was no God and that Christ would not be born (he taught about 70 years B.C.),
    3) He taught the concept of "Natural Selection,"
    4) Every doctrine he taught was exactly the opposite of the doctrines of the prophets (e.g. Alma the Younger),
    5) Korihor was commanded to be struck dumb by a prophet of God - Alma the Younger.

    In 1830, the Book of Mormon was predicting the coming forth of the theory of evolution and it was also rejecting of the theory of evolution, even before Darwin wrote his first book!!

    Many times since 1830, the leaders of the Mormon church have voiced strong criticism of the theory of evolution, even though the theory of evolution could not be disproven until 1953. This includes the president of the Quorum of the Twelve, President Russell M. Nelson.

    In addition, the Book of Mormon has a DREADFUL WARNING to those who, for profit, fight against the modern revelations and modern prophets of the LDS church: 3 Nephi 29:4-7

    This short article will explain in detail that The Book of Mormon, which was published in 1830 (29 years before Darwin's first book), explained the theory of evolution in detail:
    Article: The First Book To Describe Evolution


    Article: Where Did God Come From?

    So if many Christian churches, including the Mormon/LDS church, claim that God created all species, it is perfectly fair to ask: Where did God come from?

    While no one knows the full answer to this question, this article will dig into the subject based on what we have been told by the prophets, both ancient and modern.
    Article: Where Did God Come From?


    Article: Prophetic Book of Mormon Warnings

    This short article goes into more detail about prophets and evolution than what I just mentioned. However, if you plan on reading the Patterns of Intelligence book mentioned below, which is over 260 pages long, it is not necessary to read this article.
    Article: Prophetic Book of Mormon Warnings (pdf file)


    Spreadsheet: Alma 30: Doctrines of Korihor and Evolution

    As a support to the above article, this spreadsheet shows the vast differences between what Korihor taught (i.e. what evolution teaches) and LDS doctrine. This spreadsheet goes verse by verse in Alma chapter 30 and explains the similarities between the teachings of Korihor and the doctrines of the theory of evolution. It also shows how each is the opposite of LDS doctrine:
    Spreadsheet: Doctrines of Korihor and Evolution (Excel 2003 file)


    Article: The War In Heaven Comes to Earth (Bible and LDS)

    Before Adam and Eve were put on this earth there was a war in heaven between the forces of Christ and the forces of Lucifer, who would later become "the devil."

    This article goes into detail about the war in heaven that determined who would be born on this planet and who would not!!
    Article: The War In Heaven


    Semi-Technical Article (14 pages): Why The Confusion About Evolution?

    The intentional deceptions of evolutionists, by the use of clever terminology, are why there is such a wide diversity of opinions about evolution among LDS scientists. Very few members of the church understand the sophistication of the deceptions of the scientific establishment.

    While these discussions are also in the Patterns of Intelligence book, if you want a quick lesson in understanding the deceptive definitions used by the scientific establishment, this article is for you.
    Article: Why The Confusion About Evolution (pdf file)


    Statement: The 1909 Official Statement of the First Presidency of the LDS Church

    The 1909 statement of the First Presidency on the theory of evolution remains the official document of the church on the theory of evolution. This statement in 1909 was reprinted in the 2002 Ensign. It remains not only the official doctrine of the church, but the best description of the origin of man outside of the scriptures!! It is highly, highly recommended to the reader to study this document very carefully!!! It is unlike anything else you can read on the subject of evolution!!

    Here is a link to this magnificent article:
    Statement: "The Origin of Man" (Official 1909 First Presidency Statement)

    Here is a 14 page article with my comments about the 1909 and 1910 statements of the First Presidency. My comments focus of the relationship between the statements of the First Presidency and what scientists knew between 1909 and 1953:
    Article: Understanding the Context of the 1909 and 1910 Statements of the First Presidency


    Booklet: True To the Faith (First Presidency)

    In addition to the 1909 article, an official booklet issued by the First Presidency in 2004: True to the Faith - A Gospel Reference, while not specifically about evolution, describes church doctrines which are the very antithesis of the doctrines of the theory of evolution (e.g. See topics: Atonement of Jesus Christ; Creation; Fall; God the Father; etc.). This booklet is available on www.lds.org:
    Booklet: True to the Faith (Official 2004 First Presidency Booklet)


    The Nature of God!! (Talks by Elder Jeffrey L. Holland)

    What kind of being is God?? To those who fear they may have sinned beyond the range of the atonement, there is a magnificent message in this general conference talk about the true nature of God!!
    Conference Talk: He Hath Filled the Hungry with Good Things

    In this conference talk Elder Holland gives us a feel for the love of God towards us.
    Conference Talk: The Grandeur of God


    The Prophetic Future of the LDS Church (Talk by President Spencer W. Kimball)

    Do you want to know the future of the LDS church? A general conference talk by President Spencer W. Kimball provides a clear vision of what the future of the LDS church will be.
    Article: The Prophetic Future of the LDS Church


    The False Gods We Worship (Article by President Spencer W. Kimball)

    This classic article by President Spencer W. Kimball explains about the false gods some members of the church (and to some degree all of us) worship. Its lesson applies directly to the youth of the church!!
    Article: The False Gods We Worship


    Beware of the Evil Behind the Smiling Eyes (Talk by Elder Neil L. Anderson)

    Many attempts to lead the youth of the church astray are made by those who appear to be harmless or even friendly. This talk by Elder Neil L. Anderson, of the Quorum of the Twelve, is a warning to the youth of the church about those with "smiling eyes" who are not who they claim to be.
    Article: Beware of the Evil Behind the Smiling Eyes


    Quotes: The Power of God and the Future of the Church

    These two articles contains quotes from the scriptures and from the living prophets and apostles about the power of God, the future of the LDS church and the final triumph of good over evil.
    Quotes: The Power of God and the Future of the Church - Scriptures
    Quotes: The Power of God and the Future of the Church - Prophets


    The Role and Importance of the LDS Church President

    The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints is led by a "living prophet." This article is designed to clarify the role and importance of the President of the LDS church. It is mostly quotes of several prominent church leaders about the role and importance of the LDS church President.
    Quotes: The Role and Importance of the LDS Church President


    Quotes About Church Membership

    These are quotes about membership in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. The quotes come from the prophets and apostles.
    Quotes About Church Membership


    Website: Quotes of LDS Prophets and Apostles

    This website has quotes from all of the Presidents of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and many of the Apostles of the church. There are many very powerful quotes on this website.
    Quotes of LDS Prophets and Apostles


    Video: Creation and Evolution - A Witness of Prophets

    This is an outstanding video dealing with the theory of evolution, and especially the quotes of living prophets regarding the theory of evolution.

    The official position of the LDS church on the theory of evolution is made very clear in this video!! Many quotes of presidents of the church and modern apostles are presented.

    This video is highly recommended for anyone who wonders how the church leaders feel about Darwin and his theory of evolution.

    To Obtain a Copy, Visit:
    Video: Creation and Evolution



    Other LDS Websites on Evolution

    This is a web page that links to other websites which discuss LDS doctrine versus the theory of evolution:
    Links to Other Websites

    Here is an old version of the "Patterns of Intelligence" book:
    Patterns of Intelligence (Old HTML Version)



    To Learn More About the LDS Church

    To learn more about the LDS church, here is their official website to introduce people to the LDS church:
    To Learn About the LDS Church
    The Official Church Website

    Here is a website that has many quotes by many of the apostles and prophets of the LDS church, on a variety of topics:
    Living Prophet Website


    Church Policy

    Even though the LDS Church officially rejects the theory of evolution (see the 1909 Statement, linked to above, and the Book of Mormon, Alma chapter 30, among many other documents), no book or article which is involved in scientific debates or which discusses the scientific issues of the theory of evolution, even if it strongly supports official church doctrine, is endorsed by the LDS church unless it is part of an official church publication.

    The gospel deals with eternal and unchanging truths but all of the fields of science constantly change as new discoveries are made. Thus, the church does not establish any scientific claim as being absolute.

    As a result, the books and articles written by R. Webster Kehr represent the opinions of the author and are too scientific to be published or endorsed by the LDS church.


    About The Author, R. Webster Kehr

    This website is a product of R. Webster Kehr, of the state of Kansas. I have two college degrees from Brigham Young University: a B.S. in mathematics (1972) and a B.S. in accounting (1974).

    I am a retired cancer researcher (of natural medicine) and before retiring I worked with thousands of cancer patients every year. I wrote almost all of the articles on the www.cancertutor.com website. It turns out that natural cancer treatments are far, far more effective than orthodox cancer treatments. The www.cancertutor.com website is a great resource for all cancer patients.

    My wife Marit is from Norway. We met in Provo, Utah a month before I left on my mission to California. She is a genealogist and we have seven children and 20 grandchildren - scattered from Oregon to Alabama.

    My email address is below. Whether you have a question or a comment, please feel free to email me. I love to communicate with students about the theory of evolution.

    Don't forget to email all of your friends about this website!!

    (My email address is camouflaged to avoid web crawlers)


Note: Due to changes in search engine algorithms, this area is reserved for additional keywords:
This website is primarily about Prophets versus Evolution, meaning Evolution versus Prophets.
This is an intelligent Design article for Mormons or Latter-Day Saints.
And this manuscript also deals with Prophets versus Darwin, meaning Darwin versus Prophets.
It includes detailed discussions about Prophets or Evolution in addition to Evolution or Prophets.
This website discusses in detail the topic of intelligent design for Mormonism.
Included are large dicussions about Mormonism versus Evolution, and furthermore Evolution versus Mormonism.
Creation Scientists forget that God without Living Prophets is like mashed potatoes without gravy.
Intense discussions and debates about Mormonism or Evolution as opposed to Evolution or Mormonism are part of this website.
This LDS website, loyal to LDS doctrines, is mainly about Mormons versus Darwin, meaning Darwin versus Mormons.
This LDS website, by a member, is about Mormons versus Evolution, meaning Evolution versus Mormons.
These free articles and books are clearly and intentionally about intelligent Design website for Mormons.
This site also includes long discussions regarding Mormonism versus Darwin, plus Darwin versus Mormonism.
This website about living prophets and evolution does not forget to discuss Mormonism or Intelligent Design.
The details do not exclude the issues of Prophets or Darwin in addition to Darwin or Prophets.
This website definitely is mainly about Mormons or Darwin and not incidentally about Darwin or Mormons.
It intentionally includes discussions about Mormons or Evolution and not accidentally about Evolution or Mormons.
This website carefully includes the important topic of intelligent design and Mormonism.
There is no doubt that this website is an intelligent Design for Latter-Day Saints or Mormons website.
Creation Scientists remember to talk about God, but they forget to talk about living prophets.
What good is God without Living Prophets to lead the people of God? But it is primarily about Mormonism or Darwin as opposed to Darwin or Mormonism.
This prophets or evolution website includes chapters and discussions about Mormonism and Intelligent Design.
There is no doubt at all that this website is inclusive of intelligent Design for Mormons.
// BK1023 - Feb 19, 2016