|
About This "Prophets Or Evolution" WebsiteThis website has four free eBooks and dozens of free articles. Nothing is sold on this website. Links from one article to another are in blue and if you click a blue link the article will generally open in a new window so you won't lose your place. This also applies to articles on other websites that I link to. Items in green or magenta are informational items and are not links. Links to the www.lds.org website (to see scriptural references) should have the key versus that I talk about highlighted.
If you want to see the massive scope of this website, see this article: (remember, this is a blue link to another article): Only a small number of the articles on this website are mentioned on this home page!!! That is one reason for the Quick Links article.
About The Author Of This "Prophets Or Evolution" Website (A Retired Cancer Researcher)
Note: I am a retired cancer researcher. If you have absolutely no interest in the truth about cancer (that you will never hear in the media) and in knowing why CANCER IS NOT caused by DNA damage, it is caused by a bacteria, then skip this section and page down to the next section:
My name is R. Webster Kehr and I live in a suburb of Kansas City called Lees Summit, Missouri. I am a retired cancer researcher. Let me quickly say a few words about cancer and the articles about cancer on this website and the www.CancerTutor.com website. Orthodox medicine claims that cancer is caused by DNA damage. It is hard for me to imagine such mathematical nonsense!!! Not only is it virtually mathematically impossible for DNA damage to cause a cell to be cancerous, all cells take very, very, very good care of their DNA!!! But the real evidence that DNA does not cause cancer is the fact that cancer was being cured by natural medicine experts (i.e. herbalists and homeopaths) for more than 100 years before the discovery of DNA in 1953!!! So much for the totally absurd "theory" that DNA damage causes cancer!!! It has been known since 1890 that cancer is caused by a bacteria. If you kill the bacteria inside of cancer cells (which is easy to do), the cancer cells will revert into healthy cells!!! Why kill a sick cell?? Well, there is nothing wrong with gently killing cancer cells. Dr. Royal Rife, a microbiologist, in the 1930s, designed electromedicine devices which did nothing but kill the bacteria inside of cancer cells (which reverted cancer cells into healthy cells). Dr. Rife had a 100% cure rate for his cancer patients!!! Today his electromedicine devices are called the GB-4000 M.O.P.A. and the GB-4000 SR-4. But a natural medicine cancer treatment today will have 15 or more natural substances (e.g. herbs such as honey mixed with cayenne pepper) which may optionally include a very gentle electromedicine device. Well, gentle unless you happen to be a bacteria. But there are safety rules which is why you have to work with an expert (and I talk about these experts in my articles on cancer).
If you don't think that God has put many cures for cancer in Mother Nature, spend a couple of hours studying this ICRF Reference Manual on the www.CancerTutor.com website: Do not use the ICRF Reference Manual to design a cancer treatment, work with the experts that I talk about in my articles on cancer because there are safety rules.
On the "orthodox medicine" side of the fence (i.e. those who use chemotherapy and radiation, neither of which target cancer cells), the published 5-year cure rate of "orthodox medicine", is a pathetic 2.1%. This is inexcusable and represents the unlimited greed of many of those in orthodox medicine!!! Because the super rich own both Big Pharma and Big Media, this may be the only time in your life that you will hear the truth about cancer plus you will hear the truth from a retired cancer researcher!!!
Here is an article on this website about why DNA damage cannot cause cancer!!!!
Here is the main article on cancer on this website which links to all of the other articles on cancer on this website PLUS more importantly it links to an organization of natural medicine cancer researchers in Utah who work with cancer patients one-on-one (I used to be one of them but I am now retired)!!: The main article on cancer is also linked to in the bottom section of this home page. My complete biography and my email address are at the bottom of this home page. There is also a link to the www.lds.org website. So let's get started.
Welcome To The "Prophets Or Evolution" Website
The theory of evolution is the claim that humans "evolved" from bonobos or chimpanzees or some other primate. This claim eliminates the doctrine of all religions that humans descended from Adam and Eve, who were created by God!!! But there is much more to the theory of evolution than that!!! Let us start this discussion with a profound quote about the real purpose of the theory of evolution by the late Mormon / LDS / Latter-Day Saint / BYU scholar Robert J. Matthews (who died in 2009) in his, "Origin of Man: The Doctrinal Framework":
You might want to read his quote two or three times because it describes the very core of the evolution debate and it is razor sharp in accuracy. Dr. Matthews makes it very, very clear that the theory of evolution was DESIGNED to try and convince people that Heavenly Father and the Holy Ghost do not exist and that Jesus Christ (who no one can deny existed as I will talk about later) was not a God, meaning His mission was not divine!!! Dr. Matthews was absolutely correct, the theory of evolution is a tool to convince people that there are no Gods and thus no Godhead!!! And you thought the theory of evolution debate was about science!!! Not A Chance!!! While science is the debate field the goal of the theory of evolution is to convince people that the three members of the Godhead do not exist or in the case of Christ (who no one can deny existed) that He was not a God!!! The theory of evolution is not a passive belief, many of the atheists and evolutionists are very proactive in trying to get people to believe there are no Gods!!! The primary purpose of this website is to provide massive scientific evidence that the three members of the Godhead are very much alive and well, and WOW!! are they smart!!!!
Did Adam And Eve Exist???The theory of evolution not only does away with a belief in God but it also does away with a belief in Adam and Eve. The evolution debate is between the creation scientists/intelligent design people (i.e. scientists who claim that there is scientific evidence that there is a God) versus the atheists and evolutionists (who claim there is no God). The creation scientists/intelligent design people (and all religions) claim, by definition, that God created Adam and Eve and that Adam and Eve are on our genealogy chart. The atheists/evolutionists, meaning those who support the theory of evolution (including virtually all public schools), claim that God does not exist and that Adam and Eve never existed and that humans "evolved" from some other primate, such as bonobo or chimpanzee or monkey, etc. Darwin is their hero!!! So the foundation of the evolution debate is between what is taught in church versus what is taught in almost all public schools!!!!! But what does solid science say about the evolution debate: do we have on our genealogy chart Adam and Eve (as the churches teach) or do we have some bonobo or chimpanzee or monkey couple on our pedigree chart (as the atheists, evolutionists and most public schools teach)??? Let us think about that. If God created Adam and Eve (as all scriptures claim) then Adam and Eve would have had exactly the same DNA as modern humans. So zero adjustments to their DNA would have been needed for us to exist. And God would have created the DNA and cells for all other species, male and female. For example, God would have created the DNA for bonobos and monkeys and chimpanzees and humans individually!!! God did not modify bonobo DNA to make Adam and Eve's DNA!!!!
In the Bible, the genealogy of Christ is given all the way back to Adam and Eve!!! Christ was the son of God so this is the genealogy of his mother Mary. Joseph and Mary were cousins so they both have essentially the same genealogy. Legally Christ was the son of Joseph, but not literally, so the genealogy starts with Joseph: Note in verse 23 the comment: "as was to be supposed", meaning Christ was not really the son of Joseph, He was the Son of God!!! Noah was also on that list but it is spelled: "Noe" in verse 36. The atheists and evolutionists claim there is no God so the burden is on them to explain where the DNA and cells came from in order to create ten million animal species (nine million of which are extinct) and the DNA and cells for plants, insects, etc. etc. Much of this website is to explain the scientific and mathematical absurdity of their claims!! But let's first talk about the word "evolution" itself.
What Does The Word "Evolution" Really Mean?? (A Key Section)The atheists and evolutionists claim that all animals were created by "evolution," meaning every animal "evolved" from a prior, less sophisticated species. For example, they may say that humans "evolved" from bonobos or some other primate. But there is a major problem with the theory of evolution. The word "evolution" does not represent a tangible object or a physical process that can create things!! Evolution is only a claim or belief that there is no God. Theories and beliefs only exist inside of people's brains, they cannot create physical things, much less create physical things intelligently!!! Only tangible things can create other tangible things!!! Let me repeat that: Only tangible things can create other tangible things!!! Get that through your head: Only tangible things can create other tangible things!!! To say that "humans evolved from bonobos" does not describe a physical force (much less an intelligent physical force), it only describes a belief that there is no God. But "evolution" and imaginary processes are not tangible and they are not a force in nature such as gravity or wind or sunlight!!
See this excellent webpage on the Types of Forces: Note that the word "evolution" does not appear on that page, nor should it appear!!! In fact, the atheists/evolutionists claim that the imaginary evolution is massively smarter than human beings because human beings cannot sequence the nucleotides for a mouse (without cheating), must less for humans!! In short, the word "evolution" is nothing more than a claim or belief that there is no God!! That's it!!! Evolution is not a physical object or a force that can do things, much less do things intelligently (such as sequence the nucleotides on any DNA strand)!! Humans did not "evolve" from other primates any more than humans "evolved" from Donald Duck because both Donald Duck and "evolution" are imaginary things!!! Evolution has no eyes to see, no arms to create cells or DNA, it has no legs to travel, and above all evolution has no brain to design and intelligently sequence the nucleotides on any DNA strand and evolution cannot create the many different types of cells which were needed for the creation of one million species of animals currently on this planet, all of which have both males and females whose DNA must align in an incredibly precise way!!!
How can I make the "evolution" debate any more clear!!!!!! Superman, the tooth fairy, the flying spaghetti monster, the theory of evolution , Mickey Mouse, Donald Duck, etc. are all exactly the same thing - a make-believe fantasy!!! Please explain to me why Donald Duck cannot create and sequence a DNA strand but "evolution" can!!! None of the above fantasies can pick up a deck of cards, cook a dinner or design, create and sequence a single DNA strand!!! In fact, every time you hear or see the word "evolution" substitute the word "evolution" with the word "Superman." Superman could create and sequence the nucleotides on a new DNA strand, for a new species, just as well as evolution could!!! They are both purely imaginary!! In summary, no animal species on this planet has ever evolved from another animal species because "evolution" is nothing more than a Superman comic book!!! Let me say that again: In summary, no animal species on this planet has ever evolved from another animal species because "evolution" is nothing more than a Superman comic book!!!
Mindless AccidentsSo if there is no God, as claimed by the atheists/evolutionists, and if "evolution" has the same imaginary physical features as Superman, Batman and Robin, then what would be the force in nature that created human DNA and the DNA for all other species??? The atheists and evolutionists have no choice except to claim that the Universe, cells, DNA, etc. were all created by UNINTENTIONAL, DIRECTIONLESS, PURPOSELESS, MINDLESS ACCIDENTS!!! However, the atheists and evolutionists will never use the term "accidents" because they know that no one would believe them if they used the correct word "accidents" instead of the imaginary word "evolution"!!! "Accidents" have no brains!!! Well, neither does Superman or "evolution"!!!! But at least accidents exist. In the context of the theory of evolution, another term for "accidents" is "mistakes"!!! So we humans exist because of God or countless billions of mistakes!!! Have you ever heard the phrase: an incredibly intelligent mistake??? I will talk about where God came from later in a section called "Where Did God Come From"?? Most of this website is designed to explain why "accidents" (though I almost always use the term "evolution" because this website has been around since about 2004 and I have always used the term "evolution") could not have created a single DNA strand or a single cell on this planet!!!! When you hear or read the word "evolution" you should translate that word into the words: "mindless accidents." The word "mindless" and the word "accidents" and the word "evolution" are all redundant!!! Remember, I will continue to use the term "evolution" but when I do, remember that a more correct term would be "mindless accidents" because "evolution" is not a force in nature.
What If There Was No God??If there was no God, and if evolution were true, then humans would have had to "evolve" from some other primate. I will generally use bonobos as our "ancestors" to represent the claims of the atheists and evolutionists. But pick any primate you want. So if humans "evolved" from bonobos (or any other primate), the atheists and evolutionists must explain how bonobo DNA came to exist without God!!! And then they must explain how bonobo DNA, male and female, "evolved" into human DNA, male and female, without God??? Well, actually four bonobo DNA strands would have had to simultaneous mutate (via accidents) into four human DNA strands (in the same latitude, longitude and timeframe) via the mindless accidents of evolution if evolution were true!!! Creating a new species requires four new and improved DNA strands as I will talk about in detail later. Even scientists today could not convert bonobo DNA into human DNA without cheating because millions of changes to bonobo DNA would be needed, to four bonobo DNA strands, and many of the changes would be related to creating the massively superior human brain!!! Scientists could physically create the DNA strands, but they could not sequence the nucleotides without looking at already existing DNA!!! So how could four bonobo DNA strands be converted into four human DNA strands by nothing but the mindless accidents of evolution???!!! That is one of the key issues in the evolution debate!!! It cannot happen for reasons to be discussed throughout this website. Yet in many school biology classes (as far as I know) the theory of evolution is taught. WHY??? The theory of evolution is the ultimate STUPID SCIENCE after the discovery of DNA!!! So why is INCREDIBLY STUPID SCIENCE being taught in any school??? Isn't science supposed to be about truth??? Maybe I am old fashioned but I have always thought that truth should be taught in science classes. Have the atheists and evolutionists heard about the discovery of DNA in 1953??? Do they not know what a permutation is??? Do they not know anything about cells??? Much will be said on this website about the complete absurdity, for both physical and mathematical reasons, regarding the claims of evolution. The purpose of the evolution doctrine, of course, is to create more atheists and evolutionists who claim there is no God (i.e. who claim there is no Godhead)!!! As I mentioned, no one can claim that Jesus Christ did not exist because there are many ancient documents, even other than the Bible, which mention Him. Thus, the atheists and evolutionists can only claim that Christ did not perform any miracles (more on this below). In the Mormon religion, and some other Christian religions, there are three Gods (Heavenly Father, Jesus Christ and the Holy Ghost). However, some other Christian religions teach there is one God who has three forms (i.e. Heavenly Father, Jesus Christ and the Holy Ghost are the same God). Here is a sobering thought: "If satan himself were to design his perfect doctrine to draw people away from a belief in the Godhead, including the divinity of Christ, it would be the theory of evolution!!! Dr. Matthews, who represented the Latter-Day Saint (i.e. Mormon) religion before his death, was absolutely correct!! The theory of evolution is designed to convert people who believe that God created Adam and Eve over to people who believe that we "evolved" from lower primates!!! Because of the theory of evolution, many people no longer believe in Heavenly Father or in the mission of the Messiah or in the Holy Ghost or in Adam and Eve!!!
Is The Theory Of Evolution A Proven Scientific Fact??But a student may ask: isn't the theory of evolution a proven fact of science??? While the atheists/evolutionists may claim the theory of evolution is scientific, in fact it is not a proven scientific fact!!! The entire purpose of this website is to demonstrate, in literally hundreds of different ways, that the theory of evolution is very, very, very bad science!!! For example, if the atheists/evolutionist claim that evolution is true, they must explain how the DNA of four bonobos or monkeys or baboons, etc. (which obviously have vastly different DNA than humans) became four human DNA strands using nothing but the mindless accidents of evolution!!! And I can assure you that the set of cell types in a bonobo are vastly different than the set of cell types in a human!!! I talk about cells from time to time. So what may start out as a simple question quickly becomes the question: "can the DNA and cells of one species 'evolve' into new and vastly improved DNA and cells to create a new and vastly improved species??" And this project would have to include both intelligence issues (e.g. intelligently resequencing the nucleotides on four DNA strands to create a single new animal species) and physical reasons (physically creating and resequencing the new DNA and creating the new cells). Scientists can create DNA, and that is amazing (bravo), but they cannot sequence the nucleotides without cheating and looking at what God has done!!! And by the definition of "evolution," creating new and vastly improved DNA and cells must be done by the mindless accidents of evolution!!! And as I mentioned, in order for bonobo DNA to "evolve" into human DNA (for example) four bonobo DNA strands would need to randomly mutate into four vastly superior human DNA strands in the same latitude, longitude and timeframe!!! The more you know the worse the theory of evolution becomes!!! In fact, we could go back much further than bonobos (or apes or whatever) to the "first living cell" which would have been the first life on this planet if evolution were true. In other words, evolution could not have created bonobos first, evolution would have had to start with a single living cell!!! And over time, animals "evolved" which had more and more complex DNA and more and more complex cells. I will talk about the "first living cell" issue below in its own section. That is an interesting section. So the evolution debate is not so much about how "animals" evolved over time as it is about how "DNA" and cells evolved over time because it is assumed that DNA is what controls cell divisions to create animals. Well, as will be discussed below the spirit of the animal (even humans) is what primarily controls cell divisions. But the atheists and evolutionists reject that spirits exist or that they are required for "life." More on this below. Oh, by the way, humans have between 200 and 326 different types of cells (depending on the source, I will use the 326 number) which must be in just the right place in our bodies as the fetus is morphing from a single fertlized ovum!!! How would you like bone cells to end up in the pupils of your eyes??? You would be blind. This website will focus on the scientific issues in this debate but I will tell you how the story ends now: the theory of evolution cannot be true primarily because of the discovery of DNA in 1953 plus the ongoing discoveries about the sophistication of cells and many other issues (e.g. the physical constants)!!! Those who claim that evolution is true must deal with both the mathematical issues and the physical issues of how the DNA of one species can be changed into a sequence of nucleotides which is not only vastly different, but vastly superior, so that a new and improved species can be created (defining a "species" as an animal with a specific DNA sequence/structure) by evolution!!! As you will see, the theory of evolution is not a credible theory after the discovery of DNA and the sophistication of cells!!!
The Scriptures Predicted The Coming Forth Of The Theory Of Evolution (i.e. The Claim There Is No God)!!Was God surprised when Darwin's theory of evolution (Darwin's first book came out in 1859) started to convince people that there was no God?? Of course not!!! God is never surprised by anything. Both the Bible and the Book of Mormon (the Book of Mormon is also an ancient book written by ancient prophets, but it was written by a different group of prophets than the Bible) prepared the children of God for the coming of the theory of evolution. The last prophet in Book of Mormon times (Moroni) completed the Book of Mormon in 421 A.D.. Most of the Book of Mormon was written in the Americas. It was first translated and published (by a then living prophet Joseph Smith) in 1830.
Because the Book of Mormon was written by prophets it makes it very clear that God created Adam and Eve. For example, see 2 Nephi 2:17-27: The Book of Mormon (written anciently but first published in 1830, which was 29 years before Darwin's first book was published in 1859) there is a story where satan himself appears to a man named Korihor and satan himself taught Korihor that God did not exist (which is the foundation of the theory of evolution). The events I am going to talk about for a moment occured in about 75 B.C. so even before Christ was born satan personally taught someone (in this case) that Christ would never be born. The great Book of Mormon prophet Alma the Younger was not amused by Korihor's teachings that Christ would never be born. As a response to Korihor's demand for a "sign" that God lived, the prophet Alma the Younger (via the priesthood) commanded Korihor to be struck dumb (Alma 30: 46-60)!!! That was God's sign to Korihor, so God did show Korihor a sign!!! But it was not the type of sign that Korihor wanted!!!
In these versus Korihor (as taught by satan) was claiming that Christ would never be born. The entire purpose of the theory of evolution is to deny that there are any Gods, but in the context of Korihor the claim was that Christ would not be born in the future (these events happened about 75 B.C.).
That should give you an idea of what God (via one of His prophets) thinks about the theory of evolution (i.e. the claim there is no God, such as Christ in this case). And it should also tell you that satan does not support his own followers and in the end he drags them down to hell (if they do not repent in time)!!! Here is an article on that event: The theory of evolution today is satan's perfect doctrine because it was designed to do away with a belief in the Godhead by claiming that God (i.e. Heavenly Father) and the Holy Ghost do not exist. The atheists and evolutionists cannot claim that Jesus Christ did not exist because there are many ancient documents, even other than the Bible, which mention Him. As one example, Josephus was born in 37 A.D. (in Jerusalem) and died in 100 A.D. (in Rome, Italy). Pliny the Younger is another major example. So the atheists and evolutionists can only claim that Christ did not perform any miracles, such as the raising of the dead and His own resurrection. But even during the life of Christ, converting people away from the mission and doctrines of Christ was not appreciated by God. Here is a quote from the Bible (Christ was speaking to the people in His day, but what He said applies today just as well!!): Matthew 10:33: "33 But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father which is in heaven."
That is a warning from a member of the Godhead!!! Here is the original source: Here is another example from Matthew: Matthew 18:6-7: "6 But whoso shall offend one of these little one's which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea. 7 Woe unto the world because of offences! for it must needs be that offences come; but woe to that man by whom the offence cometh!
Here is the original source:
The Book of Mormon is nowhere near as diplomatic as the Bible (as we already saw with Alma the Younger and Korihor)!!! The Book of Mormon also talks about a punishment called: "like unto the son of perdition" (3 Nephi 29:5-7). There are very specific criteria for that punishment that I talk about in other articles (pay close attention to the phrase "like unto the Son of Perdition"): Even though the "like unto the son of perdition" category is likely a subcategory of the Telestial Kingdom, any punishment with the words "Son of Perdition" as part of the category is not something that someone should set as a goal to achieve!!! Verse 7 is an amazing verse because the prophet Nephi knew that the people in the last days would know that Christ existed so he knew the wicked people in the last days could only criticize the claims of the miracles of Christ!!!
This is an article about why verse 7 is amazing in the way it was written (NOTE: this article has a link to a website which lists many ancient documents [other than the Bible] which talk about Christ being a real person):
The Theory of Evolution Battle In The SchoolsUnfortunately, the imaginary, atheistic "theory of evolution" is taught in many schools, from middle school to college. Yes, schools are teaching religion (meaning the religion of atheism/evolution). Well, at least the biology textbooks that they use typically support the theory of evolution. The main exceptions, of course, are schools funded and operated by religious groups. In fact, many, many young people today go to church on the weekends and they are told there is a God, but during the week in school they may be taught that the theory of evolution is true and there is no God. Because of the teaching of the theory of evolution (i.e. the religion of atheism) in schools, many, many young people of all religions (starting in middle school in many cases) have lost their faith in God and have quit going to church, or if they are taken to church by their parents, they will go to church but they will not believe anything they hear!!! That is the very goal and purpose of the theory of evolution - to convince people that there is no God. "Creation science" or "creationism" or "intelligent design" are scientific claims that God lives. Teaching "creation science" is not the same thing as endorsing a specific religion. "Creation science" is purely scientific and generic (i.e. it does not favor any religion) in proving that there is a God without endorsing any specific religious denomination. There are people in all religions who teach and preach creation science. Those who argue that the theory of evolution should be taught in schools may claim that all scientists are evolutionists. However, the theory of evolution is NOT universally accepted by all scientists!! Such a claim is absurd!!! While there are hundreds of books which have been written to push the theory of evolution; there are also hundreds of books which have been written against the theory of evolution!! Four of these books are free and are on this website. Plus, in the scientific community, among those who have not written books, there are many scientists who are very much against the theory of evolution!!! Those who believe that the scientific evidence strongly supports a belief in God are called "creation scientists" or "intelligent design" supporters. The well-known and respected creation scientist Kent Hovind describes the atheists this way: "The atheists can't find God for the same reason a thief can't find a policeman." That quote hits the nail on the head!!! Pride is the underlying, undergirding, driving force of the theory of evolution, it is certainly not science!!!! Many people want to be considered the smartest being in the Universe. They want to be sophisticated!!! The atheists/evolutionists don't want to find God because of pride!!! If there was only one reason the super-atheists exist, it is pride!!! Pride is a massive, massive problem in some colleges!!! Many college students and professionals have massive, massive, massive problems with pride which is precisely why they do not believe in God!!! It is not "cool" to believe in God in many schools. It is pride which drives people like Richard Dawkins into being a prime candidate for the "like unto the son of perdition" category. They cannot accept that some ancient carpenter (i.e. Christ) could be better than they are!!! The very fuel that drives the theory of evolution and atheism is pride!!!! The theory of evolution is nothing but atheism in disguise. So any school which teaches evolution is teaching the religion of atheism in their school!!! Now only that, they are teaching REALLY, REALLY, REALLY BAD SCIENCE!!! Later on this home page I will have a section called: Measuring The Damage Caused By The Theory of Evolution which talks about creationist Ken Ham's research on the damage done by the theory of evolution to the young people of his evangelical faith (I am a Latter-Day Saint). He demonstrates that the destruction of a testimony in God begins in middle school in many cases!!! So let's get started with the scientific issues related to the theory of evolution debate!!! Fasten your seat belt!!!
The Three Most Important Articles On This Website (About Evolution)This home page would likely be more than 1,000 pages long if I did not have many articles and four free eBooks on the subject of the theory of evolution. Here are what I consider to be the three most important articles on this website because they all deal with fundamental and incredibly important issues in the evolution debate.
The First Article, the very foundation of the theory of evolution is that one species can "evolve" into a new and improved species. But with the discovery of DNA the new paradigm of the atheists/evolutionists must be that the DNA of one species can be changed into the DNA of a new and improved species. But this implies that the DNA for one species can be changed into the DNA of another species while the DNA is inside of a cell!!!
DNA is ALWAYS inside of cells!!! This article proves that changing a DNA strand, while the DNA is inside of a cell, is impossible because there is nothing inside of a cell which can change the sequence of nucleotides on a DNA strand, nor are there any extra nucleotides in any cell which can be used to increase the length of an existing DNA strand, etc.:
The Second Article, is about specific sequences of nucleotides on a DNA strand (a specific sequence of nucleotides is called a "permutation" of nucleotides). Think of the DNA of an animal in the same way that you think of the object code of a computer program. Without a viable sequence of '0's and '1's a compiled computer program would not operate. A unique sequence of '0's and '1's (i.e a compiled computer program) could also be called a unique permutation of '0's and '1's. A "unique sequence" and a "unique permutation" mean exactly the same thing. But with DNA I will not always use the word "sequence of nucleotides" rather I will almost always use the term "permutation of nucleotides." Let me note that I do not know for sure whether the DNA strand in each ova (i.e. female eggs which are fertilized by the sperm cells) for every species have exactly the same sequence of nucleotides or whether each DNA strand in each ova has a unique sequence of nucleotides. I will assume that each ova is unique, but I am not certain of that because I do not understand the DNA for identical twins. Assuming each is unique, would you write a computer program by using a random number generator to generate a random sequence of '0's and '1's???? I hope not!!! Yet, the theory of evolution (if it could create a DNA strand) would randomly sequence the nucleotides on the DNA strand every time!!! If evolution were true, there would not be a single living thing on this planet because no species would have a viable sequence of nucleotides!!!!! In other words, without a viable sequence/permutation of nucleotides on their DNA strands, no animal on this planet could exist!! But "evolution" does not have a brain, so how could the mindless accidents of evolution create viable permutations of nucleotides for the roughly nine million animal species which have lived on this planet but are extinct or the one million species which currently live on this planet??? THEY CAN'T!!!!!!!! When a new species is created, whether by God (which has happened millions of times) or by evolution (which has never happened), four new and improved DNA strands are needed for each new species!!! Because ten million animal species have lived on this planet (nine million are extinct and one million now exist) that is forty-million highly sophisticated DNA strands created and sequenced by God or the mindless accidents of evolution!!! Let me say this again: it took forty-million highly sophisticated DNA strands in order to create the estimated ten million animal species which have existed on this planet!!! My point is that FOUR RANDOM SEQUENCES OF 'A's and 'C's and 'G's and 'T's (created by modifying four existing male and female DNA [of an existing species]) could never, never, never create four highly sophisticated DNA strands to create a single new species!!!
I don't think the atheists and evolutionists are very good at math!!! Please study this amazing article: Did you see the number: 48,000,000,000,000,000!!!! That was not a typo.
The Third Article, if you follow the cell divisions from the fertilized egg of a mother, until the baby is born, it will be shown that there is an impossible paradox that the theory of evolution cannot solve when the new baby consists of sixteen cells!!! What this paradox proves is that it is not the DNA strand in the fertilized egg (i.e. ovum) that controls the cell divisions to create the new baby!!! It is something else which uses the DNA as a database, something that the atheists/evolutionists reject as even existing.
A Free Bonus Article (I Can't Count To Four So I Have To Call It A Bonus)
To make things worse for evolution there is another article that I should mention which talks about simple statistics. I call the issues for the theory of evolution Kehr's Paradox:
God wins the evolution debate!!!
|
|
Modern Prophets and ApostlesThe Church Of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (a.k.a. the "Mormon" church because of our belief that the Book of Mormon was written by ancient prophets) claims to have a living prophet and usually 14 living apostles (two of whom are in the First Presidency with the prophet). All 15 of these men are sustained by the members of the church as "prophets, seers and revelators". To no ones surprise, even living prophets and apostles have been critical of the theory of evolution. In a moment I will link to a talk given by a living apostle, Elder Jeffrey R. Holland, from a speech given at Brigham Young University. But before you watch that speech I need to talk about the word "secularism" or you will not understand much of what he talks about.
Let me quote one of the definitions of "secularism": The indifference to, or rejection or exclusion of, religion and religious considerations. As a philosophy, secularism seeks to interpret life on principles taken solely from the material world, without recourse to religion." Secularism is atheism with a bad attitude!!! "Secularism" is not only the antithesis of religion, but it can be used by secularists to proactively mock and attack religion!! Actually "secular humanism," which he does not talk about, is even worse than "secularism." Here is Wikipedia's take on secular humanism: "Secular humanism, or simply humanism, is a philosophy or life stance that embraces human reason, ethics, and philosophical naturalism while specifically rejecting religious dogma, supernaturalism, pseudoscience, and superstition as the basis of morality and decision making. The theory of evolution and secularism certainly overlap but they are not the same thing, but both can be proactive. To no one's surprise, Elder Holland's talk is against secularism!!! Elder Holland wants governments to be more and more connected to religion. Not any specific religion because missionaries of all religions should be welcome in every country (this is called "freedom of religion", which the LDS church strongly supports)!!! Elder Holland mentions many great people over the centuries who have, in some cases, given their lives to spread a belief in God and/or in a belief in freedom of religion. In his speech he talks a lot about many great people!!! But in this talk he also mentioned by name four of the best-known atheists/evolutionists!! But he did not say anything good about them. Here is a quote from Elder Holland's speech and a link to the speech. (Note: if you click on the blue link below the quote, and if you then click the triangle/arrow link on that page (on the BYU website) - you can both watch and read his amazing speech at the same time. I should mention there are some graphic statues in this video which might be too intense for high school students - his talk was given at BYU.. Everyone should watch this video at least 2 or 3 times!!! The reason is that this website is focused on atheism and evolution versus creation science and intelligent design, whereas Elder Holland's talk is at the very different level of religion versus secularism!!! Here is the quote with the four men's names highlighted:
If I had to summarize his main point in his talk in one paragraph, this is what I would say: "Religion has been the driving force for good throughout the centuries and the proper role of government is to preserve and protect freedom of religion for all religions!!! In some instances, a religion needs to be protected from another religion which has political power (or from non-religious groups)!!! Governments should not take sides in such a dispute but should make sure that no religion is harmed in any way by those in the other religion (or non-religious group)." Note the four well-known atheists/evolutionists that he mentioned by name (e.g. Richard Dawkins). I should mention that the Book of Mormon was published in 1830, more than 110 years before Richard Dawkins was born!!! And as I mentioned, the Book of Mormon was published 29 years before Darwin's first book was published!!! Yes, God didn't like the theory of evolution long before Charles Darwin and Richard Dawkins came along!!!
Before going on, and for future reference if you are interested, here is a web page with the entire Origin of Species book which, because it is a file, can be searched (note that Darwin was born long before the discovery of DNA and the ongoing discoveries about the sophistication of cells): In Darwin's defense, scientists in his day knew little or nothing about cells and certainly nothing about DNA (which was not discovered until 1953 by Watson and Crick). Two of the most-deserved Nobel prizes in history were given for the discovery of DNA. Francis Crick and James Watson won the Nobel prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1962. The original prophets who wrote the Book of Mormon finished writing the Book of Mormon in 421 A.D.!!! So even before 421 A.D. God knew that people like Richard Dawkins would exist in the last-days. All four of the men mentioned by Elder Holland easily fit the criteria for becoming "like unto the Son of Perdition." But this is such a horrific punishment that only God can make the final determination!!! For example, some of the scores of people who currently fit into this category today may repent and be forgiven. Others may not cross the line. God is the only judge. My point is that mocking the Savior (who no one can deny existed), along with claiming that there is no God, is potentially a very, very serious sin. The "evolution debate" is not an entertaining side-show, it deals with very serious issues in the eyes of God which Christ Himself implied!!!
Here is a key point to remember, the theory of evolution is satan's perfect doctrine because evolution does away with a belief in: Among the first 5 names, only the Savior Jesus Christ is admitted to have existed by the atheists and evolutionists!!!
The theory of evolution is a mirror-image of the doctrines of The Church of Jesus Christ Of Latter-Day Saints (and to a large degree every other Christian church). Here is an article on that subject (this article has a chart which compares, side-by-side, the doctrines of the LDS church - and some of the doctrines of many other churches - versus the doctrines of the theory of evolution):
Another article which digs into these issues is the First Book article which identifies three different places in the Book of Mormon where the theory of evolution is predicted (but the word "evolution" could not be used in the Book of Mormon because the word did not exist in ancient times. Nor did the word exist when the Book of Mormon was first published in 1830 as far as I know - Darwin's first book came out in 1859): OK, let's talk about the credibility of the theory of evolution from a scientific perspective!!! Fasten your seat belt and let's talk about the evolution debate!!!
The Science Debate Begins - Cell BiologyAs you read this section remember that the theory of evolution is nothing but "mindless accidents" as we have talked about already. To begin the scientific issues of the evolution debate, suppose you and a friend were on a hike deep in the forest. You were proud to have traveled so far away from civilization!! Suddenly, as you came over a hill you saw, what looked like to you, a brand-new Buick automobile with its engine running!! Would you think that this Buick was created by an accidental explosion in the forest?? Of course not!! Would you think that a team of monkeys in the forest had created this Buick?? Of course not!! Would you think that this Buick was created by a team of fifth grade children in your local grade school who had snuck out of class one day?? Of course not!! You would think that this Buick was created in a giant manufacturing plant in Michigan and/or in other states. Was the giant assembly line where this Buick was assembled created by a gigantic explosion?? Of course not!!! Guess what. Every cell in your body is far, far, far more sophisticated than any automobile or any automobile plant ever made by human beings!!! Let me repeat that: Every cell in your body is far, far, far more sophisticated than any automobile or any automobile plant ever made by human beings!!! Human beings are not even remotely capable of creating anything as sophisticated as a cell, much less a living cell!!! Before going on I need to define the phrase: "irreducibly complex system." An "irreducibly complex system on the cellular level" is, by definition, a sequence of complex chemical reactions in a cell, such that if any one of the chemical reactions was not there, or failed, the end result of the chemical reaction will fail and the entire cell may be at risk!!! Here is a quote from a book called "Evolution: A Theory In Crisis" by creationist (i.e. anti-evolutionist) Michael Denton:
He is essentially saying that accidents could not have created any living cell and I should add that there are many, many, many different kinds of cells which have existed, or currently exist, on this planet!!! And he was talking about what is going on inside of every cell in your body!!! Yes, every cell in your body is far, far more sophisticated than any automobile ever made!!! Needless to say: humans cannot create a single living cell!!!! Even if a cell was the size of a beachball, all of the scientists on this planet could not create a living cell!!! Guess what, most of the cells in your body can divide into two cells, each with the above sophistication!!! Try dividing a new automobile into two new automobiles by one team of strong men pulling on the front bumper and another team of strong men pulling on the back bumper!!! Even if they were successful at pulling the car apart they would not end up with two cars, they would end up with two worthless halves of a single car!! But not all cells divide. Be glad that brain cells do not divide or you would not be able to remember your name. That is another example of how sophisticated the human body is!!! Well, brain cells are more sophisticated than I am mentioning. Some brain cells do divide or the brains of adults would be the same size as the brain of a baby!! But even in adults, some brain cells divide and some do not divide. Well, I suspect that most of our intelligence comes from our spirit. If our intelligence came from our DNA then there would be no need for Judgment Day because we would not have any free agency. Let's talk more about cell divisions starting with a fertilized egg. Now we are going to talk about some serious mathematics!!! But your calculator won't deal with big enough numbers for what you are about to see!!!
Creating A Human Or Other Animal Via Cell DivisionsA new human baby starts out as a single fertilized egg (the ovum) and ends up, via cell divisions, with 37.2 trillion cells!!! This new baby has roughly 326 different kinds of cells some of which are transparent (or the baby could not see)!!! If your bone cells ended up in the pupils of your eyes you would be blind!!! The location throughout your body of these 326 different types of cells is critical to your survival!!! So for 37.2 trillion cells the correct type of cell (out of the 326 different types of cells) must end up in exactly the right location at the right time!!! You probably already did the math, that is 12,127,200,000,000,000 decisions as to which type of cell ends up in which location of a human baby!!! And this number is not even a single drop of water in the oceans of planets in trillions of Universes like ours as one of the numbers we will talk about when we get to the subject of permutations of nucleotides on DNA strands!!! Here is my point: human DNA is only 3,200,000,000 nucleotides long. Sorry, human DNA is no where near long enough to control these cell divisions!!! There are actually mutiple reasons that human DNA cannot control cells divisions. In my Sixteen Cells Paradox, which is linked to below, I will provide another proof that DNA cannot be controlling cell divisions and I will discuss what is controlling the cell divisions!!! Are human bodies the result of accidents?? Not a chance!!! However God did it, He had to do it!!! And these numbers are just for one species - humans!!! Humans are just one of ten million types of species which have existed, or currently exit, on this planet. And each species needs or needed its own set of cell types in the right place at the right time as the fetus is morphing!!! You are going to have to think very hard about this next paragraph, it deals with a very sophisticated issue and there is no simple way to say this: This also means, because humans start out as a single cell (the fertilized egg), that, whether evolution is true or not, in many, many cases, during cell divisions, a single type of cell, when it divides, will end up as two different kinds of cells (one of which could be similar to the previously existing type of cell or both cells could be new types of cells)!!! How does that happen??? How can a single, incomprehensible type of cell divide and end up as two different kinds of cells or at least one new type of cell (which would be required for a single fertilized egg to become a human being)??? To control where these differernt types of cells end up in the body is far, far, far beyond human comprehension when considering the sophistication of cells!!! But plants and insects, etc. also need their types of cells!!! Every type of cell in your body, and every type of cell which has ever existed, is sophisticated beyond human comprehension!!! Thousands of very, very smart scientists (and I mean really, really, really smart scientists) have a PhD degree in either Cell Biology or Microbiology or Genetics. Every cell in your body is vastly more sophisticated than any automobile or airplane ever made!!! PhDs in Cell Biology and Microbiology and Genetics are still being given out to each new generation of scientists as more and more is learned about cells!!! Any of these types of scientists could write a website dozens of times bigger than this website containing thousands of reasons that Cell Biology and Microbiology, etc. by themselves, are a massive, massive proof that God is alive and well and is INCREDIBLY SMART!!! This will become more and more obvious the more you study this website. The problem is that no one would understand their articles unless they had at least a couple of years of Cell Biology or Microbiology classes. Let me give you another example. Sometimes you see drawings or pictures which seem to show an "evolution" of species from one species to another. But if you look at the DNA of these animals (which to some degree controls what each animal will look like), the theory of evolution falls apart because it is obvious that the DNA of one species could not have "evolved" into new and improved DNA for a new and improved species of animal!!! I talk a lot about this topic on this website!! I don't have a clue as to how many different kinds of cells there are (or have been) for the one million living species of animals, the nine million extinct animal species, plants, insects and who knows what other kinds of living things there are, or have been, on this planet.
My Top Three Reasons Evolution Cannot Be True
While there are many categories of reasons why the theory of evolution cannot be true: these are my #1 and #2 and #3 reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true!!! In fact, the permutations of nucleotides issue easily wins every battle for the #1 reason evolution cannot be true as you may have already seen in my permutation's article!!! I will talk about what controls cell divisions in animals (including humans), and what DNA is used for, in the Sixteen Cells Paradox article which is linked to below. Cell divisions are not controlled by what you think they are controlled by!!! For one thing, DNA is not long enough by itself to control the complex cell divisions of any animal!!!
The Big Bang, Astronomy, The Universe, Etc.This is one of those articles that was written to keep this home page from getting way too long.
This is a link to an article that discusses six major topics about everything from the Big Bang to Tesla Physics:
This article is REQUIRED READING AND CONSIDER IT TO BE PART OF THE HOME PAGE. This article contains SOME OF THE BEST REASONS the theory of evolution is nonsense:
The Beta-DNA EnzymeI inlcude this section not because it is relevant to this discussion, but because of two really cool images on a webpage.
Even the structure of the DNA for enzymes is an evidence of God's hands. See this image of the axis of the Beta-DNA or B-DNA enzyme DNA produced by Nobel Prize winner Dr. Francis Collins (this is not why he won his Nobel Prize): If you STUDY the right-hand image, you will know WHY, if the DNA of an enzyme is cut in half, like a rope, all of the scientists on this planet could not put the enzyme back together. Nor could accidents (i.e. evolution)!!!!! But for normal DNA scientists could put a DNA strand back together. It is the sequencing of nucleotides that they cannot do.
If you want to have some fun, click on this link and try to read ALL of this online Abstract (I hope you have a sense of humor, I think it is funny): Do you realize that he was writing in English and that there are people who actually understand that gibberish!!! If you had a PhD in cell biology you could easily understand that PubMed abstract. Now you know why so many people have PhD degrees in cell biology. Not only does God live, He is intelligent far beyond our imaginations.
|
|
Sperm Cells and OvaJust for terminology, an "ovum" is a single egg in a female animal. "Ova" is plural for ovum. An ovum is what gets fertilized (by a sperm cell) and this ovum divides and begins the massive number of cell divisions which create a baby of any species.
But let us dig deeper into the sperm cells and ova of humans: The female has one or more ova (i.e. eggs) which are gender-neutral. It is the sperm cell (male sperm cell or female sperm cell) from the male, which gets to an ovum first, that will determine the sex of the baby!! There is literally a swimming race of sperm cells to get to an ovum first!!! The first one there wins and fertilizes the ovum. So not only does "evolution" have to create and sequence DNA and create cells, it also must be able to create cells (sperm cells) which can swim and win a swimming race!!!
The Four New DNA Strands Which Are Needed To Create Any New Species From An Existing SpeciesWhile it takes three kinds of DNA strands to maintain an existing species, it takes four DNA strands to create a new species from an old species (though two of these can be the same kind)!!! Let's dig into this issue.
To maintain an existing species it takes three kinds/types of DNA strands: The reason only one type of female ovum is needed is because any ovum can be fertilized by either a male sperm cell or a female sperm cell. With many of each of these three types of DNA for every animal species, the animal species can have offspring in order to perpetuate the species. Well, there are a heck of a lot more sperm cells than ova. However, if evolution were true, which it is not, it would take four new and improved DNA strands to create a new and improved species!!! Likewise, if God created a new species, He would need to create four new and improved DNA strands for each new and improved animal species. Let's talk about humans "evolving" from bonobos as an example (if evolution were true). Four bonobo DNA strands must be changed into four human DNA strands for the human race to begin. The reason four new types of DNA strands are needed to create a new species from an old species is that a new species (humans in this case) needs to be able to have both a male and a female baby!! Here are the four bonobo DNA strands I am talking about which must evolve into four new and improved human DNA strands so that the human race can begin (the minimum two new human male sperm cells and the minimum two new human female ova must be completed in the same generation, latitude and longitude so the bonobo mother (or mothers) can give birth to two human children (a male and a female) who can grow up and have their own human children!!! 1) Millions of mindless changes to a DNA strand in at least one bonobo male sperm cell in a male bonobo to create a human male sperm cell, 2) Millions of mindless changes to a DNA strand in at least one bonobo female sperm cell in a male bonobo to create a human female sperm cell, 3) Millions of mindless changes to a DNA strand in a gender-neutral ovum in a female bonobo (for the first male sperm cell [to create a male human] to fertilize), 4) Millions of mindless changes to a DNA strand in a second gender-neutral ovum in a female bonobo (for the second male sperm cell [to create a female human] to fertilize). And the millions of mindless changes (in each of these four cases) to start the human race (two from male bonobo DNA and two from female bonobo DNA) must align with each other at the function level!!! Also note that bonobos, like all mammals, would have many sperm cells involved in this swimming race to the ovum, most of which are bonobo sperm cells which have not been modified by evolution!!! So the two new human sperm cells must win the swimming race!!! This is just another gigantic bump in the road for the theory of evolution. There are also latitude, longitude and timeframe issues as I already mentioned. For example, if the first male human DNA strand was created by evolution one-thousand years before the first female human DNA was created by evolution or if the two bonobo mothers lived 5,000 miles apart, you would not be reading this sentence (because you would not exist) if evolution were true!!! Well, one or two bonobo fathers and one or two bonobo mothers could be involved, but this is an academic issue because the statistics of any of this happening are so bad. Plus, the bonobo parents (of the first human male and female babies) must not kill or abandon their human babies because human babies are really funny-looking to bonobos (i.e. they do not look like their beautiful bonobo children)!!! How would you like to marry a bonobo??? Well, no bonobo would want to be married to you!!! And the four new human DNA strands must align with each other at the function level (so the humans can have children of their own) before any human children can be born!!! And the new human couple, or their descendants, must eventually start having more than two human children so that the new human race can begin to grow in numbers!!! The probability that millions of mindless, random, accidental changes to each of four bonobo DNA strands could occur and that these random changes would create four vastly superior human DNA strands for the human race, and these many millions of changes must realistically be spread out over many generations (and the DNA must align in each generation or disasters would occur - which in itself is a major proof that evolution cannot be true) is both physically and mathematically and common sense absurd!!! Yet, the "evolution" of the DNA of the bonobo sperm cells and ova into human sperm cells and ova is precisely the foundation of the theory of evolution after the discovery of DNA in 1953!!! And there have been ten million animal species which have lived on this planet, all of which would have to go through the same process that creating humans from bonobos would have to go through if evolution were true!!! That is forty-million new and highly sophisticated DNA strands created by the mindless accidents of evolution without any significant evidence of failures in this process!!! By the way, only one million of these ten million species still exist. If evolution were true, the Cambrian Explosion cannot be explained because evolution cannot create a new species with four new DNA strands which must align with each other (at the function level of course), much less create many new species in a short amount of time (which is the characteristic feature of the Cambrian Explosion, meaning the word "explosion" means: a relatively short amount of time)!!! And if the theory of evolution were true, a really good genealogist could trace our ancestry (species to species) back to the "first living cell". Well, they are probably busy enough that they don't need that assignment. In addition, monkeys don't keep very good genealogy records. We can summarize the theory of evolution debate thusly: how can four DNA strands of one species be both physically and intelligently changed into four DNA strands for a new and improved species BY SOMETHING THAT DOESN'T EVEN EXIST (I.E. "EVOLUTION")???!!! And quite frankly, accidents aren't much smarter than Superman, but at least accidents can do tangible things!! Well, as far as sequencing DNA is concerned, humans aren't much smarter than Superman or accidents. About this time any statistician would declare a winner in the evolution debate: God!! But there is much more to talk about in more detail. Fasten your seat belt!!!
A KEY ARTICLE: The Sixteen Cells ParadoxSo far everything I have said implies that it is the DNA of an animal that masterminds the cell divisions to create a new species from an old species. Thus, to create a new species from an old species only requires changing the DNA in four existing DNA strands of an existing species to create a new species which starts with four new DNA strands. But this assumption is about to change big time. Some time ago I was simulating in my head the cell divisions after an ovum was fertilized. When I got to the new human baby having sixteen cells something struck me: if the DNA in all sixteen of these cells were identical to the DNA in the fertilized egg (which would obviously be the case) and if DNA were the only thing controlling the cell divisions then each of these sixteen cells would lead to a new baby with 1 head, 2 arms, 2 legs, etc.!!! The new baby would therefore have sixteen heads, 32 arms, 32 legs, etc. Let me repeat the key points I just mentioned: If the DNA in all sixteen of these cells were identical to the DNA in the fertilized egg (which obviously would be the case) and if DNA were the only thing controlling the cell divisions then each of these sixteen cells (just like the original fertilized egg would do) would lead to a head, 2 arms, 2 legs, etc. for the new baby!!! The new baby would therefore have sixteen heads, 32 arms, 32 legs, etc. In other words, if the DNA in the original ovum would lead to a human baby, then each of the sixteen identical DNA strands, when the new baby consists of sixteen cells, would also lead to a human baby and the end result would be a single baby who has the features of sixteen human babies (if DNA were solely controlling the cell divisions)!!! It was clear to me that the assumption that DNA is solely controlling the cell divisions IS NOT CORRECT!!! Something other than DNA must be involved in controlling the cell divisions!!! Let me repeat that: It was clear to me that the assumption that DNA is solely controlling the cell divisions IS NOT CORRECT!!! Something other than DNA must be involved in controlling the cell divisions!!! Well, I could have used eight or sixteen (which is what I chose) or thirty-two or sixty-four heads, etc. It was arbitrary that I chose 16. In reality, a human being starts out as a single fertilized egg and via many trillions of cell divisions, a human baby is born nine-months later with one head, two arms, two legs, etc!!! The math simply doesn't make any sense!!!
The Sixteen Cells Paradox article PROVES THAT DNA CANNOT BE THE MAIN THING THAT IS CONTROLLING THE CELL DIVISIONS!!!! And this article explains WHAT THE PRIMARY THING CONTROLLING CELL DIVISIONS IS!!!! Does this mean that spirits have cells??? I don't know, but spirits must be made of something. The "Sixteen Cells Paradox" applies to all animals (male and female), not just humans. So all animals have a spirit!! This should not surprise anyone because all living things require a spirit for life!!! So it is efficient for Heavenly Father to create the spirit (though sometimes you read in LDS literature that spirits are not created, they have existed forever) so that the spirit can both create life and control the cell divisions. And spirits come from God!!! This can explain why the DNA of male sperm cells and female sperm cells can align with each other - because DNA is a database of information, not a computer program to control cell divisions!!!! It would be much more difficult to align a new computer program on each of four new and improved DNA strands than to change the databases in four new and improved DNA strands; though I am sure God could do either of these things. So the length of the DNA strand is largely, if not entirely, dependent on the size of the database on the DNA!! This is why the above DNA strands can align with each other, because the database "fields" can align. And this also destroys the theory of evolution because each species will have its own unique spirit and thus its own unique database (on their DNA). And the theory of evolution rejects the existence of spirits (and thus it rejects that we will live after death). So if two animal species have the same size DNA, it has little or nothing to do with the size and shape of the species (it has to do with the size of their databases). So the atheists and evolutionists have a major problem. They don't believe in God therefore they don't believe in spirits (i.e. they only believe in evolution). Therefore, they must explain the "Sixteen Cells Paradox" without mentioning spirits!!! Let me repeat that: So the atheists and evolutionists have a major problem. They don't believe in God therefore they don't believe in spirits (i.e. they only believe in evolution). Therefore, they must explain the "Sixteen Cells Paradox" without mentioning spirits!!! To dig deeper, the spirit controls the cell divisions and the size of the DNA will be largely (if not entirely) dependent on the size of the database, meaning the size of the individual database elements (e.g. "fields") on the DNA strand!! The largest DNA strand on this planet, and it is much, much larger than human DNA, is for a fish, protopterus aethiopicus, which has 133 billion nucleotide pairs on its DNA!!! Why a fish has such a gigantic database I do not know. Maybe this type of fish has an unusually high number of different types of cells - I don't know. Let me briefly talk about "life." Scientists have tried to create life from non-life. They will NEVER be successful unless God cooperates and provides a spirit. I do not know if each bacteria has its own spirit or whether there is some general spirit for single-celled living things. I talk more about "What Is Life?" in a section later on. Humans, and all other species, exist because of God!!! Yes, science has confirmed that the Biblical account of Adam and Eve IS TRUE!!! Your genealogy chart has Noah and his wife (some Bible scholars think her name was Naamah) on it and Adam and his wife Eve on it!!! In other words, Adam and Eve are on mine and your genealogy chart, not some bonobo couple!!! Try saying that in some college biology class!!! I would do it, but then I am an ex-Marine and Viet Nam veteran so everyone would be polite to an old man who went to war and got blown up while on patrol.
The Two-Male DNA Alignment Issue - This Section Will Absolutely Blow Your Mind!!!!If you are keeping track, time after time after time I am explaining the intelligence of God. This section is just another example of the supreme intelligence of God. The sophistication of DNA is one of the premiere reasons evolution cannot be true. This section is another example of the impossible sophistication of DNA for any animal species. After reading this section you will know that God is very much alive and well and incredibly smart!!! There is no way that accidents or even humans could do this!!! This section will make the theory of evolution look exponentially worse than what I have already described!!! Let us look at the two types of male DNA strands in the sperm cells for any animal species. One creates a male baby and one creates a female baby. Both of them must align with a female DNA strand in her ovum. But if each of them aligns with a female DNA strand in the ovum (at the function level of course), this implies that the two types of male DNA must align with each other (at the function level, not the nucleotide level), yet one will lead to a male baby and one will lead to a female baby!!!! There is no specific reason that the two types of male DNA strands need to align with each other at the function level except for the fact that BOTH OF THEM must align with a female DNA strand at the function level!! Here is the amazing thing: two male DNA strands must align with each other (at the function level but not at the nucleotide level), yet one of them will create a male baby and one of them will create a female baby!!! This is incomprehensible!!! Yet this fact applies to roughly 1,000,000 animal species which are currently on this planet and 9,000,000 extinct species of animals!!! This is yet another reason that spirits must be involved in cell divisions for a new baby and a reason why DNA must primarily be a database.
But I want to show this somewhat graphically to emphasize my point. There are three kinds of DNA strands, for every existing species, which must align with each other at the function level: All three of these kinds of DNA are very, very different yet they must align with each other at the function level!!
Now let us ignore the third item in the above list and show the list again: What this means is that the two types of DNA in the male, one of which creates a male baby and one of which creates a female baby, must align with each other at the function level because both of them must align with the gender-neutral DNA in the female ovum at the function level!!!! Yet one of these DNA strands will lead to a male baby and the other DNA strand will lead to a female baby!!! This is impossible!!! Yet, if DNA is looked at as a database, it makes perfect sense!!! Two databases are much easier to align than the object code of two computer programs!!! But note that this concept applies to one million living animal species and nine million extinct animal species!!!! Two male DNA strands must align with each other at the function level, yet one will create a male baby and the other will create a female baby!!! NO WAY!!!!! But God has done this for ten million animal species, one million of which are alive today!!! God must be really, really busy!!! And I am sure that is precisely why God designed DNA to be a database!!!
OK, well no one believes that this is a major reason evolution cannot be true (even though my first college degree was in mathematics), so here is a homework assignment tonight for human scientists. For some extinct species for which they only have (or a living species if the sequence of nucleotides in the male sperm cells, to create a female baby, is withheld from the scientists):
The task of scientists (or accidents if you believe in evolution) is to design, sequence and create, without cheating: Good luck!!! I was born in 1946 so I am not going to live long enough for that to happen!!! Nor will my great-grandchildren live long enough (I don't have any yet, but I will soon)!!! I can assure you, given this assignment, that scientists would be delighted to learn that DNA is a database!!! In fact, scientists are NOT EVEN CLOSE to decoding the entire DNA strand of any species of plants, animals or insects!!! I don't think that knowing that DNA is a database (instead of a computer program) would help them very much. God is a tough act to follow!!! But no matter what most scientists read they are too proud to admit that a God could exist who is massively smarter than they are!!!! I suspect that ants think they are smarter than humans. Hopefully by now you have read the articles on permutations and changing the sequence of nucleotides inside of a cell. If not, please read them before going on.
Moving A Segment Of DNA To Another Location on the DNA Strand (i.e. Cut And Join)This section is somewhat similar to the "Changing The Length Of A DNA Strand By Evolution/Accidents Is Impossible," but it is different enough to justify its existence. Let us look at one of the issues that is deadly to the theory of evolution!!! The entire foundation of the theory of evolution is that one species (i.e. its DNA) can be changed into new and improved DNA for a new and improved species. In order to change the DNA of one species (bonobo DNA) into the DNA of a new and improved species (human DNA), millions of segments of DNA (on the bonobo DNA) would need to be moved, deleted and created from scratch on each of the four bonobo DNA strands to create four new and improved human DNA strands!!!
As an example, let's look at a single "move" of a section/segment of DNA (on the bonobo DNA) to a different location on the new human DNA strand (i.e. as part of creating human DNA from bonobo DNA): Now note at this point that the segment, when joined, must "point in the right direction." In other words, suppose a segment ACGGTCC was moved to another location on the DNA. But let us suppose as it was floating around in the cell that it was accidently put in backwords so that the new area where the segment was placed had the segment CCTGGCA. That would cause a problem. And if many segments were "moved" there would be many cases where the segment went in backwards. This is another problem for "evolution." Another issue is that when a segment is cut out (as part of a move) it would just be floating around in the cell and how would it find the right slot it is supposed to land in, and how would it know which direction it should be put in as I just mentioned????? Actually, at the peak of this process more than a million segments of DNA would be floating around in the cell at the same time (it would take too long to do this one segment at a time). How would the right segment find the right "slot" and point it in the right direction??? Here is another issue. In order to convert bonobo DNA into human DNA, let us assume that human DNA is longer than bonobo DNA. Whether it is or not, there are many cases where a shorter DNA strand (for one species) would have to "evolve" into a longer DNA strand for the new species. Here is the question: where do the new segments (which are not from bonobo DNA) come from??? The cells in bonobo DNA do not have any extra nucleotides sitting around waiting to create a new species with a longer DNA strand!!! In any case, millions of changes to bonobo DNA (to each of four bonobo DNA strands) would be necessary to create human DNA.
Now read this article (if you haven't already read it) as to why a segment of DNA cannot be moved while the DNA strand is inside of a cell:
|
|
More On Cell Biology And Microbiology"Cell Biology" is essentially the study of the cells that exist in animals and plants. "Microbiology" is the study of single-celled organisms (i.e. microorganisms, well they are not always single cells, but that is all I will talk about). Every cell is vastly more sophisticated than anything ever made by humans as I have already mentioned!!! In Darwin's day it was possible to believe in the theory of evolution because scientists in his day knew nothing about DNA (DNA was discovered in 1953) and they knew nothing about the physical constants and they knew almost nothing about cells. But today, with what is known about DNA, the physical constants and cells, the theory of evolution is complete and absolute nonsense!! Remember the quote I mentioned above about the complexity of cells. Michael Denton did not say there was one such sequence of chemical chain reactions in cells, but "tens of thousands" of such sequences!!! You should see the size of my cell biology books!!! One of my Cell Biology books (Essential Cell Biology, third edition) has 9 authors and has a glossary with more than 900 terms!!! Here is the title of a section in Chapter 18: Unattached Chromosomes Block Sister-Chromatid Separation. How would you like to take a test on that subject??!! I wish I was smart enough to understand that book. This book is for third-year Cell Biology students!!! So is The World Of The Cell book. I have a granddaughter in college who is studying Microbiology. She must have gotten her brains from my wife.
Here is a 13 minute YouTube video which deals with the probability of creating a single protein by pure chance:
Here is a 10 minute YouTube video which talks about the same subject!!! This is an even more amazing YouTube Video:
Here is an entire article on Cell Biology (you could call it an introduction to an introduction [60 more times] to Cell Biology and Microbiology). The good news is that it links to some really cool YouTube videos:
This is a string which you can copy and paste into Google that is another resource for information about cell biology, but in this case I think most or all of it is free: You should get more than 200,000 hits!!! Many of these articles include YouTube videos!!! There are many, many, many types of cells which could not have been created by the mindless accidents of evolution!!! Someday I hope to find a Cell Biologist or Microbiologist who will write a few articles on why cell biology (or even microbiology) is a proof that the theory of evolution is false. These people are smart!!! You would know that if you ever tried to read a graduate school textbook in cell biology or microbiology!!!! The problem is that no one would understand their articles!!! More on cell biology from time to time. By the way, I just saw an amzing television show which talked a lot about the Kuiper belt. It was the discovery of this belt that got Pluto demoted to a dwarf planet. I already have some ideas about it, but for now I don't have the time to dig into the subject. OK, let's talk about God from the Latter-Day Saint perspective for a moment (the next two short sections) since the main comments are in two articles and an amazing website of short videos on www.lds.org.
Latter-Day Saint Section - Meaning Mormon Section (Which Anyone Is Welcome To Read - We All Have The Same God)What started out as a large section of links to Latter-Day Saint articles (e.g. Mormon articles) on this home page has now turned into two articles to keep this home page from getting way too long. Well, it is already way too long. This article has many links to general conference talks, etc. etc. This article is required reading for Latter-Day Saints but even for non-Mormons there is a lot of information relative to the Bible!!
Here are just three of the many links to other articles which are mentioned in this article:
These are the key scriptures mentioned in The First Book article:
So here is the article, LDS Section:
The LDS Scholar article is somewhat similar but it does have some additional comments. It also has a test question for LDS scholars and every one of them will have the wrong answer to the test question:
Non-Denominational, Free And Amazing Bible Videos By the Church Of Jesus Christ Of Latter-Day Saints!!!!!!!!!!There is a spectacular, incredibly well done set of short non-denominational YouTube videos on the life of Christ made by the LDS church (i.e. the "Mormon" church or officially "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints"), which are free and online!!! I LOVE THESE SHORT VIDEOS!!!
Anyone of any Christian religion will love them as they are totally non-denominational and purely, word for word, out of the King James Bible without any added comments. And the quality and authenticity are amazing:
Measuring The Damage Caused By The Theory of Evolution Being Taught In SchoolsWhile the theory of evolution versus creation science debate is heated, the debate is far more than academic because many students are victims of this battle!! As a result of the teaching of evolution in many schools, countless middle school, high school and college students have lost their belief in God or they may question their belief in God. Remember, any school which teaches the theory of evolution is teaching the religion of atheism!!! In other words: these schools are TEACHING RELIGION, not science!!! Fortunately, the damage done by evolution can be measured. Studies funded by the very well known evangelical creationist Ken Ham organization have shown that most of the loss in a testimony of God occurs in middle school and high school, not in college!! Ken Ham's conclusion, based on statistics, is that many students are already gone by the time they get to college!! Remember those two words for a minute. An analysis of "hit" patterns (relative to "hits" for this website) from a billboard in Utah (Utah is mostly Mormon), that I paid for, also came to the same conclusions as the evangelicals - that most of the damage is in middle school and high school!!! But of course, those who still have a testimony of God when they enter college will have that testimony challenged in college depending on what courses they take and what university they attend. I should also note that the evangelicals do not have the Pearl of Great Price scriptures of the Mormon church. Many things in the early chapters of Genesis (written by Moses) were damaged (i.e. poor translations, lost documents, injected bias, etc.) over the many centuries between when the early chapters of Genesis were originally written and today. As one example, the early chapters in Genesis are frequently interpreted to mean that the entire Universe (or our Galaxy) was created in six literal days. This is nonsense. If our entire Universe had been created in six literal days (six thousand years ago), then the light from distant galaxies would not be anywhere near arriving at this planet yet (i.e. we wouldn't be able to see any other galaxies yet)!!!!! Nor would we be able to see the vast majority of the stars in our own galaxy!!!
The Pearl of Great Price exists to fix a lot of the damage done to the Bible. But it has other things in it as well.
Here is a link to the first Ken Ham video: "Already Gone - Part 1" (22 minutes) about the damage to the youth in his evangelical religion caused by the teaching of evolution:
If you were not automatically taken to Part 2 - here is "Already Gone - Part 2" (20 minutes): In these two videos he has some brilliant comments about Noah's Ark!!! He makes it clear that Noah's Ark was plenty big enough to save every species that God wanted to save (and even too big). I sometimes wonder whether the flood was designed to kill-off some of the 9 million now-extinct species along with many very wicked humans. As we would say: "God killed two birds with one stone - the flood"!! The flood may have had some benefits that we should appreciate (if many animals still existed which were destroyed by the flood or before the flood). I don't think that grade school children today would want to run into a hungry T-Rex on their way to school!!! Just a guess. The point is that the teaching of evolution and even secularism in public schools is having a significant effect on the beliefs in God and Christ even before the children get to college (where the colleges can take over destroying what is left of their belief/testimony in God). As Ken Ham would say, these students are spiritually "Already Gone" by the time they get to college!!! The point is that when students are still at home, the parents need to know what is being taught in their local schools regarding evolution. But colleges can also damage many testimonies about God.
Natural Selection"Natural selection" is the claim that stronger species survive and weaker species may not survive. Natural selection is perfectly true. However, "natural selection" is frequently used as "evidence" for the theory of evolution. However, I should note that "natural selection" has never created a new species!!! And natural selection never makes a species stronger!! By definition natural selection can only eliminate weak species WHICH ALREADY EXIST which are killed via environment, starvation or they are killed by other species. Natural Selection doesn't create any new DNA or any new cells!!! As far as one species killing-off another species is concerned, natural selection is only effective when two or more species already exist!!! But in all cases, natural selection is purely an elimination process that eliminates weak species!! Natural selection is not a creation process!!! In other words, natural selection reduces the number of species on a planet, it never increases the number of species on a planet!!! Let me say that last part again: natural selection reduces the number of species on a planet!!! Remember, there are nine million extinct animal species which have lived on this planet. Some may have gone extinct because of weather changes, others may have gone extinct because some other species killed them off or because their food supply was cut-off or because of Noah's flood. Natural selection is NOT evidence for evolution because it is only an elimination process after multiple species already exist!!! For example, you may hear the phrase: "evolution by natural selection." I just did a Google search on that phrase and got 819,00 hits!!! How can that many people be so easily deceived!!! Well, because they hear it from others and then they repeat it because it sounds cool. It is what they want to hear. Natural Selection is perfectly true, but it is purely an elimination process!!! The phrase "evolution by natural selection" is nothing but an oxymoron after the discovery of DNA!! Remember, the only thing that natural selection can do is eliminate weak species!!! The claim that natural selection is "evidence" for evolution" is paradoxical!! NATURAL SELECTION WORKS AGAINST EVOLUTION. Evolution is "trying" to create new and improved species (which it has never done) and natural selection is trying to eliminate existing species (which it does all the time)!!! Let me repeat that: NATURAL SELECTION WORKS AGAINST EVOLUTION. Evolution is "trying" to create new and improved species (which it has never done) and natural selection is trying to eliminate existing species (which it does all the time)!!! Natural selection will easily win that battle because natural selection does not have to deal with the statistics of creating and sequencing new DNA and cells. A problem with natural selection is that because DNA cannot be created and sequenced by evolution, there should be no species of animals on this planet so natural selection should have nothing to do because there should not be any species to "select" from!! But given that God has created millions of species of animals, natural selection is a perfectly valid scientific concept!!! Remember, while natural selection is a valid concept, IT IS ONLY AN ELIMINATION PROCESS. Some people might claim that natural selection increases the overall quality of species on this planet by eliminating the weak species. That is true, but do not infer from this that natural selection can create a single new species!!!
This article will go into great detail about why Natural Selection has absolutely nothing to do with evolution:
Important Notes Before Going On To The Next Major Section Of This Home PageYou are more than half way done with the home page but there are a few things I need to mention. Note #1: When I realize that I have made a mistake (e.g. for a long time I thought that DNA is what solely controlled cell divisions) it can take a year or more before I get around to updating and fixing all of the articles that have this mistake!!! So you will still be seeing articles or chapters of books on this website which mention that DNA controls cell divisions for many months to come!!! Note #2: Don't forget: please, please, please tell your friends about this website, such as via social media or email or by putting a link to this website on your website. There is no other website on the Internet even close to this website on the subject of why the theory of evolution cannot be true!!! I know how many hits I get every day and I can tell by the "hit patterns" that a couple of times someone on social media has spread the word!!! Wonderful - Thanks!!! G.o.o.g,l,e is a piece of garbage from the perspective of those who have websites. G.o,o.g,l.e has no clue which websites are bad, which websites are good and which websites are subject-matter expert websites!! While I do get a few hits from G.o.o.g,l,e, I can assure you they are very, very rare given the size of this website. So it is up to YOU to spread the word on social media, emails, etc!!! Note #3: The original purpose of this website was to host a free eBook. Well, now there are four free eBooks on this website plus links to many other articles on evolution and links to many articles for Latter-Day Saints (which of course anyone is welcome to read).
Here is a link to these books and articles when you get around to them: The Quick Links article just mentioned also includes a link to an article which lists more than 400 reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true. It is an old article but I suspect the vast majority of it still contains accurate reasons why evolution cannot be true. But it is not up-to-date with the best reasons. Let the next section of this home page begin.
|
|
More On The Sophistication Of Human DNA (And The Spirit)A human DNA strand is seven feet long, but it is coiled up to fit inside of a cell that cannot be seen with the naked eye!!! This DNA strand is combined with, and used by, the spirit of the new baby. The new baby is made of roughly 37.2 trillion cells which includes 60,000 miles of blood vessels, etc. I do not know if spirits have blood vessels, but maybe they do?? Or maybe that is one of those DNA things the spirit doesn't deal with. The 60,000 miles of blood vessels in this newborn baby would wrap around the earth at the equator twice, with 10,000 miles of blood vessels left over!! Ponder that for a moment, we are talking about a human baby!!! When the baby is born he or she will have an incredible brain which is connected to a massive nervous system, a skull to protect the brain, a spine to protect the spinal cord (which is a cylindrical bundle of nerve fibers), two eyes which are connected to the nervous system which can see in 3-D, a beating heart, a liver, a pancreas, 300 bones (which eventually fuse into 206 bones), etc. etc.!! The DNA in a sperm cell of the father of the baby contributes part of the DNA for the new baby and the DNA in the mother's ovum (egg) contributes part of the DNA for the new baby. The DNA strands include databases from the mother's DNA and father's DNA which must align with each other at the function level and are accessed by the spirit of the new baby!!! But it is even more complicated than that. Men actually have two types of DNA strands: the DNA in the "male sperm cells" which will lead to a male baby and the DNA in the "female sperm cells" which will lead to a female baby. The DNA in the mother's egg/ovum is gender-neutral. So if a male sperm cell penetrates the mother's egg first (along with its DNA), a male baby will result. If a female sperm cell penetrates the mother's egg first (along with its DNA), a female baby will result. The sex of the baby is literally a swimming race of sperm cells to penetrate an ovum first!!
Comparing The Creation Of DNA (Supposedly Created By Evolution) To The Creation of Computer Programs (Created By Humans)
The process of writing real computer programs can teach us a lot about the process of evolution which has supposedly written new and improved DNA millions of times (to create new and improved species). In other words, if computer programmers wrote computer programs the way that evolution must sequence DNA strands (using nothing but mindless accidents), there would not be a single, functional computer program on this planet!!! Here is an article on that subject: But of course evolution (if it were real) would have the added burden (which computer programmers do not have) of aligning the DNA of four DNA computer programs (i.e. four DNA strands) with each other when creating a new species from an old species. The father's two new DNA strands (when creating a new species) and the mothers two new DNA strands (ditto) must align with each other at the function level, and these four DNA strands must be exactly the same length in each section!!! I would like to see four teams of computer programmers who are given the same assignment to independently (they are not allowed to communicate or collaborate with each other in any way to simulate the stupidity of evolution) write four massively complex computer programs with exactly the same objectives. Each program must create a binary string (i.e. a complied computer program). When done the four binary strings of the four computer programs, written independently by four different computer programmers who do not compare notes, must align with each other (at the function level) meaning all four of the binary programs must be exactly the same length for each functional section (e.g. subroutine) and overall!!! That is only part one. Then they should try to write these four new computer programs by using nothing but four different random number generators (to simulate "evolution")!!! While DNA is primarily a database that does not make the problems for evolution any easier. Random is random. For example, suppose evolution/accidents tried to create four new male and female human DNA strands from four male and female bonobo DNA strands. Remember, evolution requires four new and improved DNA strands to create a new species, in this case humans. Suppose the DNA strand created by evolution for the first human male sperm cell was fine (which is impossible). But suppose the DNA created by evolution for the second human male sperm cell had only 99% of the length of the DNA for the first human male sperm cell?? And what if the first female DNA strand for the first human female ovum was only 97% as long as the DNA for the first human male sperm cell?? And what if the second female DNA strand for the second human female ovum was only 95% as long as the DNA for the first human male sperm cell??
We wouldn't be here if evolution were true!!! As we have already done, let us define a "field" to be a very specific segment of DNA which creates a very specific enzyme or has some other very specific function needed by the cell. A human DNA strand would require many more "fields" than a bonobo DNA strand would need, such as in the creation of the human brain. This means that in the conversion of bonobo DNA into human DNA there are many more "fields" of DNA segments (not just individual nucleotides). Each "field" must be the same length, and in the same location, on all four DNA strands even though we are talking about the DNA of two very different species!!! The probability that four randomly created human DNA strands (randomly created by the pure accidents of evolution by modifying bonobo DNA), after millions of changes to their original bonobo DNA (to create the human species), would be the same length as each other and that all four DNA strands would align at the function and field levels is total nonsense!! This certainly would not be the case when the human brain was created from a bonobo brain because humans would have far more "fields" in their brain DNA than bonobos. My point is that the four human DNA strands created by evolution WOULD PROBABLY NOT EVEN HAVE THE SAME LENGTH!!! In other words, if four bonobo DNA strands "evolved" into four human DNA strands, the "fields" would not be the same "fields" and the "fields" would not be in the same location or in the same order or the same length (because everything was done randomly)!!! And keep asking yourself: where are the failures of evolution???
Humans And Chimpanzees - A Common Ancestor???
You have to admire the creativity of the atheists and evolutionists in their attempts to get new converts. Let me quote from another website obviously written by an evolutionist (the coloring is mine):
I am not exactly sure he/she means by the phrase: "we share about 99% of our DNA". Obviously 99% of bonobo DNA and 99% of human DNA are not the same sequence of nucleotides!! I doubt that my DNA and the DNA of my oldest son John are 99% similar!! I cannot figure out what the authors mean.
Here is a quote from another website: "Despite the similarities in human and chimp genomes, the scientists identified some 40 million differences among the three billion DNA molecules, or nucleotides, in each genome." This also doesn't make any sense. If anyone concludes that chimpanzees have 96% of the intelligence of humans, they have been sniffing something!!! I still have not found a source for exactly how long chimpanzee DNA is. Because scientists have no clue what DNA is used for, how in the world can they come to these conclusions!!! It is clearly a play on words. The concept of "common ancestor" is totally based on the assumption that evolution is true and that DNA can be changed!!! Well, our DNA does have something in common with chimpanzee DNA. We have a common designer - God!!! Computer programmers reuse subroutines all the time!!! When God designed the DNA for humans and chimpanzees He may have used some sections of DNA more than once. God is efficient. I don't know whether He designed human DNA first or chimpanzee DNA first. This method is common, for example, with those who design automobiles as they would occasionally use common parts from an old model car in the new model car. This saves money for the automobile manufacturer. Or there could be other reasons that God (or some of His children He assigned the task before Adam and Eve were put on this planet - we were spirits back then) used "common parts" on DNA. The point is that the fact that DNA cannot be changed (to create a new species from an old species) is VERY IMPORTANT when thinking about the claims of the atheists and evolutionists. This is just an example of how the atheists and evolutionists assume evolution is true as part of their "evidence" that evolution is true!!! To put it another way, anyone can prove anything if their clever terminology (e.g. "common ancestor") bypasses the massive scientific problems with their claims (e.g. that evolution is true). It amounts to "proof by using clever terminology and making massive assumptions" - such as by claiming humans and chimpanzees have a common ancestor!! The fact that there is a massive difference in intelligence between human intelligence and bonobo intelligence, yet if our DNA differences are not that great (which I question), is a massive proof that humans and bonobos have spirits and that the difference in our intelligence is mostly, if not entirely, because of our spirits, not our DNA-based databases!!! In addition, DNA is "irreducibly complex," meaning every section and sequence has to work the first time!!! Evolution cannot rewrite a section of DNA that was not quite right the first time and then insert it into the DNA where it belongs (after cutting out the bad section)!!! Especially for four DNA strands!!! Try telling a group of computer programmers that they are not allowed to change the source code of a computer program after the first draft is written. They would not be happy at all!!! But God gets it right the first time!!! That is why you don't see any evidence of dead, mutated species whose DNA was not quite right the first time!!! Where are the errors of evolution??? Even if evolution were true there would be massively, massively more dead and mutated species than perfect species!!! But we observe just the opposite!!!!! Thinking about evolution - DNA has no way to tell whether the sequence is "correct" or not, nor does it care - DNA itself is as dumb as a rock. So is the theory of evolution. If one animal feels inferior to another animal (in terms of survival skills) that animal cannot change its own DNA so that it is stronger in future generations!!!
A Little More About CellsI wasn't kidding when I said that a team of cell biologists could create a website several times larger than this website just talking about cells!!! Thousands of scientists have PhD degrees in "Cell Biology" or Microbiology!! Cells are not simple!! So how could a PhD in Cell Biology or Microbiology think for one instant that cells, and what goes on inside of cells, were created purely by accidents???!!!
Here is an article about the sophistication of cells - very interesting stuff (this has some YouTube videos): I am not sure what his complaint about the Big Bang is so I have no comment on that. The Big Bang obviously did happen. Maybe he was saying it was not an accident. I agree with that.
Here is the bottom line: the scientific evidence is overwhelming that accidents have not created a single cell or a single DNA strand or a single galaxy or Universe!! Nor have accidents intelligently sequenced the nucleotides on any DNA strand!! The entire foundation of the theory of evolution is scientific nonsense!! Here is my article on Cell Biology and Microbiology, which I linked to above: Trust me: God is alive and well and He is a heck of a lot smarter than any of us!! And because we are His children (at the spirit level) we have a lot more potential that we can conceive now!!! Many people (such as cell biologists) spend their entire careers trying to figure out what God has done without giving Him any credit!!!
|
|
The Magnitude Of The Problems With The Theory Of EvolutionThe biggest problem I have with maintaining this website is keeping track of all of the reasons that evolution cannot be true!!! It is literally humanly impossible to constantly be changing articles every time I come up with another reason evolution cannot be true. The above items are just a few of the hundreds of scientific reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true which are discussed on this website. But I should emphasize that the MAGNITUDE of the reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true is simply beyond comprehension. The permutation issues of the DNA for several million species, all of which have or had (if they are extinct) both males and females, alone would eliminate any chance that the theory of evolution is true. In the permutations article is this quote:
And the construction of millions of different kinds of animal cells (considering all animal species) which must be in exact locations on the body (after the morphing of the embryo) or plant cells or insect cells, etc. are more massive reasons evolution cannot be true!!! Each animal, plant and insect species probably has many unique types of cells which apply only to that species!!! And each of these types of cells must be in exactly the correct location!!! And where are the failures of this brainless process??? Even computer programmers, with very good brains, almost always have to redo their first few drafts of a new program written from scratch!!! Do not look at each reason the theory of evolution cannot be true as being equal with the other reasons. Some reasons are massive enough, by themselves to make the theory of evolution completely ludicrous!!! Now I want to make it very clear that many students have been fooled by the atheists and evolutionists. This is nothing to be ashamed of!!! The atheists and evolutionists have perfected the art of deception, they are well-organized, very well-funded and their deceptions are highly polished!!! Atheists don't want a God to exist because a God would be massively smarter than they are. So most of them do everything in their vivid imaginations to pretend there is no God and to claim that everything in the Universe came to exist by pure chance. God is replaced by mindless accidents!!! Of course, some teachers are required to teach the theory of evolution even though they may not believe in the theory of evolution. This is because judges do not need to pass a test in Cell Biology before they get sworn in!!! Maybe it should be required in the future!!! Maybe a person should not be allowed to be a judge unless they can pass the same test a graduate school student in Cell Bioloby must pass. That would fix a lot of problems with the Republican/Democrat debates.
Here is the article with more than 400 reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true which I link to from time to time:
Here is an article which will grow in numbers (e.g. numbers of reasons evolution cannot be true) as I get time to go through the many notebooks (and old versions of the home page) where I have written down many ideas about why the theory of evolution cannot be true: I literally have stacks of spiral notebooks with notes on why the theory of evolution cannot be true. I hope I live long enough to go through all of them.
What A Student Should Not Do!!So what should a student do when they realize the theory of evolution is complete scientific nonsense?? It is definitely not advisable for a student to argue with their teacher, but there is nothing wrong with a student quietly going "online" and learning the truth about the absurdity of the theory of evolution because of the sophistication of DNA and the sophistication of the cells that the DNA resides inside of, among many other reasons (e.g. the physical constants and the Universe). Just quietly, and low key, spread the word among your friends. Definitely mention this website if a teacher gets involved!!! Have your teacher email me if they have any questions or comments (my email address is at the bottom of this home page). I will be happy to answer his or her questions and I would appreciate their comments if they think I say something wrong. I am human after all so I might be wrong on some issues. In fact, I have made changes in this website based on user comments. Well, I don't look at my emails every day so it may take some time for me to read their email.
Evolution After The "First Living Cell" (A Major Section!!!)If you were going to build an ocean liner you might start with a single bolt. Well, if evolution were true, the first thing evolution would have created would not be a Woolly Mammoth, it would have been a single cell, which is called the "first living cell." Ditto for humans: humans were not the first living thing on this planet!!! For one thing, humans would have had nothing to eat if we were created first by God or evolution. The "Garden of Eden" existed before Adam and Eve existed. There is a reason the garden was made first!!! Plants need dirt. Humans cannot live on dirt.
Life had to start with a very simple, single cell if evolution were true. So let us first talk about the credibility of the "first living cell" theory as claimed by the atheists and evolutionists in this article: Evolutionists claim that the DNA of the first human male and the DNA of the first human female "evolved" independently over millions of years, from the same "first living cell"!!! And everything had to happen by a series of accidents called "evolution"!!! But to do this each new male and new female of a new species had to "evolve" in the same latitude, longitude and timeframe (so the species could have had offspring)!!! This just adds to the headaches of evolution!!! We know that human DNA is 3,200,000,000 nucleotides long. Let us assume that the length of the "first living cell" was 10,000 nucleotides long. At an average increase in length of 15,000 nucleotides for each new species, there would have been 213,333 species between the "first living cell" and human DNA!!! And once the first "animal" was created by evolution, each "new" animal would have needed four new and improved DNA strands!!! But there would have been a different path (diverting at some point) from the "first living cell" to Woolly Mammoths than from the "first living cell" to humans. And what was the species just before the Woolly Mammoth??? And so on. These are all insane claims of the atheists/evolutionists considering all of the problems with creating a single new species from an existing species!!! And at some point, starting with the first animal species which had both a male and female, male DNA and female DNA had to "evolve" independently from there on. In other words, for each new species four new and improved DNA strands would need to align with each other at the function level!!! How did the DNA of the first human father and the DNA of the first human mother "evolve" together (i.e. at the length and function of DNA level) from the "first living cell?" And how were the 4 DNA strands synchronized, for each species after slightly improved species, as the DNA of the males and females evolved independently for millions of years?? And don't forget the latitude, longitude and timeframe issues!!! And where are the massive, massive, massive numbers of failures in creating new DNA caused by permutations of nucleotides for four new and improved DNA strands for each new and improved species??? And to compliment what I said above: suppose the male DNA evolved slightly faster (say 1% faster) than the female DNA evolved (or vice versa). Within many thousands of years of new species, their DNA would not align and they would not have been able to have any children that survived because their DNA was not compatible!! That species would be the end of evolution for that line. So four DNA strands, starting with the first animal, must evolve together for species after species in the same latitude, longitude and timeframe, until humans existed!!! I don't think the atheists and evolutionists are very good at mathematics. Male DNA and female DNA had to be designed by God, for each species with a male and female!! Evolution could never have designed two massively sophisticated computer programs/databases (DNA) that could be integrated together to create a third computer program (a baby who has features of both parents). And evolution certainly could not have done it in the same timeframe and same locations on the earth. And don't forget the Sixteen Cells Paradox which proves every animal species (as a minimum) has a spirit that is required to control cell divisions!! And don't forget the unique set of cells needed by each species!!! Not only would the DNA be constantly changing (as evolution progressed), but the set of cell types and combinations of cell types and locations of cells in the body would constantly be changing!!! You will never see the above few paragraphs in a science book or biology book at the high school or college level!!! No textbook author is ever going to ask me for permission to use information from my website!!!
The Evolution Debate Is About The Existence Of God, Not ScienceThe evolution debate today is not about science, it is about God. If you assume God does not exist, or if you believe God does not exist, you will likely believe in the theory of evolution no matter how absurd it is. And you will use your vivid imagination to fill in the gaps where the theory of evolution has massive problems. Unfortunately, many people who believed in God have been tricked into believing in evolution. In fact, that is the precise purpose of the highly sophisticated deceptions of the atheists and evolutionists (and I have only talked about a few of their deceptions on this home page) and why it is taught in most schools, but not all schools. In some private schools, owned by a religious group, "creation science" or "intelligent design" is taught and in other schools there are disclaimers about evolution. PAY VERY CLOSE ATTENTION TO WHAT I AM ABOUT TO SAY - I WILL SAY IT TWICE - IT IS VERY, VERY, VERY IMPORTANT: Here is an interesting idea that school administrators should consider: HOW ABOUT TEACHING SCIENTIFIC FACTS INSTEAD OF TEACHING SCIENCE FICTION (I.E. THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION)!!!!!! Wow, what a novel idea - who would have thought about teaching good science instead of scientific fantasies in the classrooms?? I doubt that anyone in any school has ever thought about that!!! This is NOT teaching religion because everything that is taught is easily proven scientifically!!! It is the atheists and evolutionists who are teaching religion because there is no scientific basis for atheism or evolution!!! Let me repeat what I just said because I am serious about this issue: Here is an interesting idea that school administrators should consider: HOW ABOUT TEACHING SCIENTIFIC FACTS INSTEAD OF TEACHING SCIENCE FICTION (I.E. THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION)!!!!!! Wow, what a novel idea - who would have thought about teaching good science instead of scientific fantasies in the classrooms?? Has any federal of state Supreme Court judge outlawed the teaching of very good science??? Well, yes!!! More often than not!!! Atheism (i.e. the theory of evolution) is the official religion of most state and federal judges in the United States!!! No one cares about truth, all they care about is perpetuating atheism/evolution!!! Biology is no longer about science, it is about creative thinking as to how every discovery in science can be attributed to the theory of evolution (i.e. "without God") in order to get more converts to atheism. Atheists are not interested in truth, they are only interested in getting converts to atheism. One of the key deceptions of the atheists and evolutionists, to get converts, is their definition of the term "species." They define the term "species" in such a way that each "variety" of dog is a different "species." To them a Chihuahua and a Great Dane are different "species." This gives them the latitude to claim that they have observed a new "species" form by evolution and that evolution is therefore true!!! But if the term "unique species" is defined to be a "unique DNA structure" (as it should be) then they have never seen a new "species" be created!!!! Nor will they ever see a new species be created by accidents or by the human breeding of animals. Their bogus claims amount to "proof by using clever definitions"!!! If someone assumed that humans were the smartest animal on this planet, which we are, then certainly no other species (e.g. bonobos) could ever have had the intelligence to design new DNA for a new species because humans cannot do it!!! In other words, if humans are not smart enough to design DNA, then bonobos are not smart enough to design DNA!!!!! And, believe it or not, accidents are dumber than bonobos!!! Bonobos would be proud of that!!! In fact, scientists themselves cannot create a new species if a person uses the correct definition of "species" (i.e. a "species" is each group of animals which have identical DNA structures).
So I guess that "evolution" is the smartest entity on this planet because: So that makes accidents massively smarter than humans (including judges)!!! This may be one reason why atheists and evolutionists don't like to talk about DNA, they like to tell stories and use deceptions, such as by using very clever deceptive definitions. Seven chapters in one of the free eBooks on this website are devoted to deceptive definitions!!! All levels of judges and all levels of school administrators will ultimately be judged BY THE VERY PERSON that their policies forbid talking about in school. I can tell you who is going to win in the long run - the very same God that they claim doesn't exist!!!!!!!!!! Judgment Day is not about how popular a person is with their peers or students, it is about TEACHING THE TRUTH after a person has done everything they can do to find the truth (totally independent of popularity)!!! Let's look at a simple example of deceptive dfinitions.
Deceptive DefinitionsLet me give you a quick example of clever definitions. There are two kinds of "evolution." One is microevolution and one is macroevolution. Microevolution is nothing more than variety within the same species. For example, there are many, many kinds/breeds of "dogs" (e.g. boxers, chihuahua, great danes, etc.). This variety within the same species (i.e. the species "dog") is called microevolution. Macroevolution means that "evolution" has created a new and improved species (e.g. humans from bonobos), meaning there is new and improved DNA!! However, there has never been a proven example of Macroevolution (i.e. new DNA being created from old DNA)!!! That fact is not going to stop the atheists and evolutionists. What the atheists and evolutionists will do is look at an example of microevolution and claim it is an example of "evolution." But this is a lie!!! They are using the generic term "evolution" so the reader or student thinks that the teacher is talking about macroevolution, which would be true evolution. Because of this deception the student may believe in the theory of evolution. But it is a lie because microevolution is not true evolution, it is variety within the same species (i.e. varity within the same DNA structure). The key is that the teacher may be defining the word "species" to include examples of microevolution so they can claim they have an example of "evolution"!!! It is a clever deception!!! The term "new species" and macroevolution should mean exactly the same thing!!
Cell Biology Books, Some Written By Creation ScientistsCells are so sophisticated that the average person would have to go to school for several years just to understand a basic document about the sophistication of cells written by a PhD in Cell Biology of Microbiology!!! I would love to have a staff of people dig through all of the pro-evolution and anti-evolution books which have been printed. I am sure I would learn many, many things from the anti-evolution books. I don't know how many cell biology books mention "evolution," but the sophistication of cells is clearly a proof that evolution is nonsense. I own a giant textbook on Cell Biology which is called: The World Of The Cell, Fourth Edition, by Becker, Kleinsmith and Hardin. This textbook is 845 pages. I also own a book called The Dictionary of Cell and Molecular Biology by J.M. Lackie. It is 725 pages and the print is small. While these books are pro-evolution, they are good for something. They clearly prove that there are thousands of reasons the theory of accidents cannot be true due to the sophistication of cells; and this does not include the many issues created purely by the DNA in almost all cells!!
I also own two books which were written by "creation scientists" [yes, people who openly admit that they believe in God also write books] and I am sure there are many other creation science books on this topic: These two men obviously believe that God had to create the many different kinds of cells on this earth (all species are made of cells) because they could not have been created by accidents. Every microorganism on this planet is far more sophisticated than any jet airplane on this planet!!! It is not even close!!!
What is Life? (A Very, Very Important Section That Atheists Have No Answer For)"Life" is a major problem for the theory of evolution. Because the atheists/evolutionists do not believe in God they do not believe that any living thing has a "spirit." Let us look at the issue: "what is life?" For example, if you took a fish and left it out of the water until it died, and then an hour after it died you put it back into the water, why doesn't it come back to life? All of the raw elements for life (including all of the DNA and cells) are still functional and still in the fish, so why doesn't it come back to life? There is something more to "life" than just cells and oxygen and water. That would be a spirit!!! When the spirit leaves, there is no way to bring an animal back to life unless God allows the spirit to return (after it had left). Furthermore, have the evolutionists and atheists ever proven that life can be created from non-life (i.e. inorganic materials)?? Never, never, never - yet they continue to preach atheism.
While several attempts have been made to create life from non-life (e.g. Miller-Urey, Wong, et. al. and Hartgerink), the scientists have not only failed to create life, they have also failed to prove it can be done!! Here is a "creation science" article on this subject: For example, have scientists put a large shell over a pond, which had no life, meaning there was no DNA and no cells (this simulates "prebiotic" conditions, meaning "existing before life"), and observed "life" form by a series of accidents, including RNA or DNA inside of a "first living cell" (in that pond), that was alive and had the ability to divide itself into two cells (which would be required for complex life to survive and evolve)? Never!! Actually, that experiment could never be done because it would be impossible to prove there is no life in any pond before beginning the experiment!!! Yes, even the "first living cell" (if it is our ancestor) had to eventually divide into two cells (etc.) for life to perpetuate!!! How could something that simple divide?? The "warm pond" thing has no credibility. I don't think the temperature of the water can overcome the statistical problems with creating a living cell, which can divide into two cells, using the mindless accidents of evolution!!! Then what is their evidence for evolution? Their only evidence is that many scientists are very arrogant and they do not believe in God and thus they have no choice except to use their God-given brains to deceive people into believing that everything in the Universe, including human DNA, occurred by chance. But the theory of evolution should have been thrown in the trash can when DNA was discovered and when the complexity of cells was also discovered. Yet, as scientists learn more and more about DNA and cells, the atheists continue to cling to the theory of evolution as if it were still 1859, when Darwin's first book was published. Every new discovery leads to a new fairy tale to explain how it came to exist by accident. Just like gasoline fuels a car, pride and popularity fuel of the theory of evolution!!! The only thing that is "evolving" on this planet is the theory of evolution as evolutionists/atheists constantly need to develop new spin to account for the new discoveries about the sophistication of cells, the morphing of the embryo algorithms on DNA, etc. Actually, the atheists and evolutionists make no attempt to explain how accidents could have created any living thing on this planet. It is much easier to just give evolution the credit and move on.
Can Accidents Or Simplicity Create Complexity?As one example of complexity, the human eyes are unbelievable in complexity. Yet the sections on human DNA which create the human eyes must be far more complex than the eyes themselves (this is assuming there are no spirits)!! And the intelligence who designed the DNA (God) must be far more complex than the DNA itself!! In other words, simplicity never creates complexity. Intelligence is top-down, not bottom-up!!! Let me repeat that, simplicity never creates complexity. Intelligence is top-down, not bottom-up!!! To understand these concepts, consider these items: First, consider that a human-designed computer program exists because of the human intelligence to write the computer language, the human intelligence to write the computer program, the human intelligence to write the computer language compiler, the human intelligence to design and build the microprocessor, including designing and building the memory chips, etc. Second, consider the output of the computer program which is printed on a piece of paper. How can the printout on the piece of paper be more sophisticated than the human intelligence needed to write the computer program, to write the computer language, etc.?? It can't!! Let's think about the memory chips. My son John retired from working for a company in Idaho that makes memory chips. At times he would be sitting in a very, very large room, by himself, with more than a billion dollar's worth of equipment needed to make memory chips!! The memory chips cannot be more complex than the machines that made them, and the machines that made them cannot be more complex than the humans who designed them and the humans who built them!! Simplicity cannot create complexity!! There is no functional, useful machine (or computer progam) on this planet that was not designed and built by human beings!! Let me repeat that: There is no functional, useful machine (or computer program) on this planet that was not designed and built by human beings!! So why do the atheists and evolutionists claim that all of the many different kinds of cells (for all animal species), every one of which is far more sophisticated than any human-built machine, were created by accidents!!! And they claim that the DNA in the cell was created and sequenced by accidents!!! Consider the sophistication of DNA such that it creates a person's brain. Let us think about a pianist. A pianist must be able to convert thousands on dots on a sheet of music into the movements of their fingers!! To do this the DNA must create the nerves between their eyes and their brain, then the brain must process these dots and then the brain must send signals to the fingers of the pianist. And the DNA must create the muscles on their fingers, etc. If all of this is in place, and with thousands of hours of practice, spread over many years, a pianist can play the Rachmaninoff Piano Concerto #3!!
Here is a YouTube video of Anna Fedorova playing the Rachmaninoff Piano Concerto #3 (watch for at least 3 and a half minutes so you see her fingers when she really gets going)!!! Better yet you can just listen to it and continue reading. You will know when her fingers are really flying around: Try to teach a bonobo to play this piano concerto!!! It would never happen!!! Humans are special because we are the children of God.
Many years ago I had a friend who, if you put sheet music in front of him that he had never seen before he could play this music immediately. He was the nicest guy in the world!!! If you put such a piece of sheet music in front of me, I wouldn't have the slightest clue how to play that piece of music!!! And most people would not do any better than I would. Many people have incredible talents that the average person does not have. How could evolution have created these special "gifts" (i.e. "talents") that only a very, very small number of humans have?? What (i.e. Who in this case) created our DNA, which in turn created our brain, had to be far, far smarter than our DNA and our brain!!! That would be God. Much of what we can do comes from our spirit and God merged our spirits with our bodies. Somewhere in this process "talents" were created, which came from both our DNA (which came from our parents) and our spirits. Maybe we learned many things while we were still spirits (before we were born with a physical body). Accidents (i.e. evolution) have zero intelligence so how could accidents create something with intelligence? They can't!! Intelligence is a top-down process and someone a lot smarter than humans had to design human DNA and the DNA for every one of the several million species of animals on this planet which have or do exist, all of which have a male and female. Which is more intelligent: accidents or monkeys?? Think about that. Obviously monkeys. The limit of monkey intelligence is far higher than the limit of accidents!!! But monkeys cannot design and create the DNA for an extinct species or play a piano concerto!!! Could accidents or monkeys design and build a Buick automobile? Of course not. It takes a lot of intelligence, including many different specialties, to build a Buick automobile. Only humans can build an automobile. Likewise, only God could have sequenced the DNA and created the cells for several million species of plants, animals and insects.
Where Did God Come From??It is natural for a person to ask: "where did God come from??" The truth is that God had to exist long before our Universe was created and our sun was created and this planet was prepared for earth life. So people naturally want to know where God came from and what was He standing on when he first came to exist!! Brigham Young, who was born in 1801 (Darwin was born in 1809), the second prophet of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (the Mormons), said this about the first cause of all things (i.e. where God came from):
And Brigham Young said this long before the discovery of other galaxies and the sophistication of DNA and cells were discovered!! In other words, there was a "First Cause" of all things - a beginning - but this beginning happened so long ago, and so many quadrillions of things have happened since then, that these events are far, far beyond human comprehension. By the way, the largest desert on this planet is 5.5 MILLION SQUARE MILES in size (the Antarctica Polar Desert)!! The Arctic Polar Desert is 5.4 MILLION SQUARE MILES in size!! And there are many other deserts. There are a lot of grains of sand on this planet for the ant to count, the ant better get started!! If Brigham Young had known these two facts, and other facts about deserts, I doubt he would have changed his statement!!
Bravo!!! While Brigham Young did not know anything about DNA and cells and he knew very little about the Universe in his day, he did understand the principle that the "first cause of all things" is far, far, far beyond human comprehension. Brigham Young also said this about God:
And I would add that God, or those He deligated the task, sequenced and designed the DNA and cells for 10 million animal species!!! We know much, much more today about the Intelligence of God than Brigham Young knew in his day!!! Imagine what Brigham Young would say today, after he knew about cells and DNA and the physical constants and the Universe!!! God is smart!!!
A Summary and Overview Of Some Key IssuesBefore the summary let me just say that this website has been around since about 2004. Some of the articles on this website are so old that I have not looked at them for well over 3 or 4 years!!! So I guaranee there are many mistakes scattered among all of the articles and books on this website!!! This home page has far less mistakes than the articles because this is the first article that people see so I spend most of my time working on this home page!!! So far we have barely touched the surface of the reasons evolution cannot be true (remember I have a single article with more than 400 reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true), yet even at this point we have no logical choice except to conclude that God exists. Different religions may have different beliefs about God, but there is no choice except to say that God does exist. In the Mormon religion (The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints) there are three separate Gods in the Godhead. The head God (Heavenly Father), the Savior (Jesus Christ, who is also a God in the Godhead) and the Holy Ghost (who is also a God in the Godhead). If scientists are so smart, and they believe that God does not exist, can they create a Universe with a planet like Earth that has (though most are extinct) several million animal species which have both males and females? And every animal had unique DNA and many different kinds of cells!!! Scientists are constantly claiming that accidents are massively smarter than they are because THEY cannot create a single living cell with functional DNA inside which they sequenced!!! The evolution debate is not about where bones came from, it is about where DNA and cells came from!!! In other words, when you see fossils, think about the DNA and cells that created these animals (if there is no God and no spirits)!! How did the "morphing of the embryo" algorithms come to exist for many, many complex species, especially when there is a male and female in the species (as all animals have)? And where are the failures of nothing but brainless accidents?? It is scary to think that Woolly Mammoths have spirits that certainly exist in the "spirit world" (all of them have died so all of their spirits should still be on this planet in the spirit world)!!! By the way, the "spirit world" is on this planet, we just cannot see spirits (but they can see us). My wife is in the spirit world. There are a heck of a lot more spirits on this planet (for animals and humans) than there are people and animals that we can see!!!
For those who have loved ones in the spirit world (and we all do), here is an incredibly scholarly article on the spirit world which is on the BYU website which was written by Professor Brent L. Top: The only thing I would add to what he says is that there are temptations in the spirit world and a person could theoretically drop from the Celestial Kingdom (at the time of their death) to the Telestial Kingdom (while in the spirit world) because of the things a person does in the spirit world (e.g. the spirit world version of adultery, which would more accurately be called "violating chastity"). Murder cannot be committed in the spirit world because spirits cannot die. The "temptations" he was quoting in his article were mortal temptations. It is far beyond the scope of this home page to talk about many subjects. But trust me: the probability of a viable permutation of nucleotides, to create both a male and female for a single advanced species (the permutation of nucleotides on the DNA would have to be almost perfect in order to perform the morphing of the embryo for both a male and female offspring, even if DNA is primarily a database) is insanely improbable. The issue of permutations of nucleotides is the real death of the theory of evolution!!!!! This is not an issue that can be "explained away" with fancy storytelling and vivid imaginations!!! It is pure mathematics!!!! The statistical problems created by permutations of nucleotides make the theory of evolution look very, very bad!!! Here is an interesting paradox: which came first the cell or the DNA inside that cell?? If the DNA came first, how did a cell get created and then the DNA get put inside of this cell without damaging the cell or the DNA?? If the cell came first, there is nothing inside of a cell that can create a DNA strand or even modify it, much less sequence it.
A SummaryIn summary, here are just a few of the key reasons that evolution (i.e. accidents) could never have created human beings: 1) Obtaining a viable permutation of nucleotides on DNA, that could create a human baby (or even be a database for the spirit), is statistically impossible. It would be far more likely to pick a single atom which is hidden among many, many quadrillions of Universes. This is NOT an exaggeration!! Permutation issues (considering all animal species) are the #1 reason evolution cannot be true!!! 2) Creating DNA from scratch (e.g. for the "first living cell") is impossible for many reasons (however, humans can do this), 3) Creating a cell from scratch, by accidents, is impossible for many reasons - the inside of a cell is like a small city - (humans cannot do this), 4) Creating life from non-life is impossible and has never been done (though it has been attempted), 5) Creating the mechanisms in the cell, which use the DNA as patterns to create proteins, is impossible to happen by accident. For example, how does this mechanism know WHERE on the DNA a specific protein code is located and how does it FIND THAT SECTION?? If scientists know the answers to these two questions, how can they claim that these mechanisms came to exist by accident?? Only 1% of DNA is coded for proteins (the WHERE ARE THE KEY SECTIONS OF DNA issue is a topic by itself), 6) Creating the mechanisms inside the cell to constantly protect and check the integrity of the DNA strand, 7) And so on. Just ask any computer programmer how long it would take to write a complex computer program using code written exclusively by random number generators. It would never happen!! And "evolution" is a heck of a lot slower than computers!!! So if humans cannot design and create from scratch DNA or RNA (well they can create DNA, but they cannot sequence it), plus a cell for the DNA or RNA to exist inside, and give their new cell "life," with a new spirit and a viable permutation of nucleotides to provide information for the spirit, why would anyone believe that a series of pure accidents (i.e. evolution) could have created the "first living cell" in a sterile pond (Note: by definition, before the "first living cell" there was no life)?? In order for evolution to be true: accidents would have to be many thousands of times smarter than humans!!!!!!! Let me repeat that: In order for evolution to be true: accidents would have to be many thousands of times smarter than humans!!!!!!! Many reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true are mentioned in various other articles on this website, such as the "Twenty-Five Reasons The Theory of Evolution Cannot Be True" article.
The Evolution DebateWhile there are more than 300 books which are favorable to the theory of evolution there are also many books which are strongly critical of the theory of evolution!! There are also many YouTube videos on both sides of the debate. Those who are critical of the theory of evolution are called "creation scientists" or "creationists" or "intelligent design" people because they believe that scientific data favors a "Creator" of the Universe. In fact, if you want to get published in a leading biology journal you better be an atheist and your article better support the theory of evolution. If it does not praise Darwin and evolution your article will end up in the trash can, not in a "science" journal!!! They will not even read your paper!! They love popularity and they are deathly afraid that someone will claim that they believe in God (their status would drop through the floor)!!! Let me repeat that because it explains why the theory of evolution still exists: they are deathly afraid that someone will claim that they believe in God (their status would drop through the floor)!!! From the incomprehensible sophistication of DNA, to the amazing complexity of cells, to the earth we live on, to the ends of the Milky Way Galaxy, to the furthest galaxy cluster and supercluster (by the way, the supercluster we live in is called the Laniakea Supercluster which has about 100,000 galaxies), and considering the "constants" in physics (e.g. the gravitational constant); the credibility of the theory of evolution has dropped to ABSOLUTE ZERO!!! By the way, there are about 110,000,000,000 GALAXIES!!! This number will go up and up as bigger and bigger telescopes are put into space. This number will never stop growing permanentally, it will always grow as telescopes get bigger and better!!!
By the way, our solar system is a lot bigger than you think it is!!! Here is a beginners guide to the Kuiper Belt!!!
Other Anti-Evolution BooksIf you listen to the propaganda of the pro-evolution monopoly you might think that anyone who believes in creation science (i.e. God) is a dolt. Nothing could be further from the truth. There are many "creation scientists" (i.e. those who believe God created this Universe) who are brilliant and have no problems seeing through the false science generated by the scientific establishment. In fact, many anti-evolution books have been written by brilliant scientists. This listing of anti-evolution books and DVDs contains only a small sampling of the anti-evolution books which exist in print. In fact, there are more than 200 anti-evolution books. Many of the books were written by PhDs in the sciences. The arguments in these books totally shred the theory of evolution from a scientific standpoint. Some of these books may be out of print and you may have to use a book finder, such as Alibris, to find them.
Here is a link to this appendix (some of these 30 or so books may push a specific religious denomination): By the way the "young earth" concept is caused by damage done to the book of Genesis in the Bible over centuries of time. This damage caused people to claim that the entire Universe was created in a few day's time. If this were true, we would not be able to see distant galaxies yet or even most of the stars in our own galaxy. In the Mormon church, the Pearl Of Great Price was largely written to fix the damage to the book of Genesis. This was mentioned above.
If you know of any book or CD that needs to be added to my list, please let me know. Here is a Google search that will yield over 3,000 hits: If you have read this far: pat yourself on the back!!!!! Good job, now go and tell many others!!!!!
And don't forget the article which lists many articles on this website, most of which are not mentioned on this home page: The above article is linked to in the next article I will talk about.
When you are ready to read one or more of the four free eBooks on this website, here is an article which links to the four free eBooks on this website (and it links to an article which mentions more than 400 reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true) and it links to other articles (such as for Latter-Day Saints). Two of the four eBooks have links to the individual chapters of the book: And don't forget to tell your friends about this website, whether in person or by email or by social media. Thanks in advance!!!
|
