|
Welcome To The Prophets Or Evolution WebsiteFirst, let me say that nothing is sold on this website. This website has four free eBooks and many free articles. Links from one article to another article are in blue and if you click a blue link the other article will generally open in a new window so you won't lose your place. This also applies to articles on other websites that I link to. Items in green or magenta are informational items and are not links.
If you want to see a quick vision of the scope of this website, including the articles on natural cancer treatments (I am a retired cancer researcher) see this page (this is a blue link to another article):
About The Author - R. Webster Kehr, Retired Cancer Researcher, And The Truth About Cancer!!!My name is R. Webster Kehr. I live in Missouri, near Kansas City. I am an ex-Marine, Viet Nam veteran who was seriously wounded in action. Yes, I have a purple heart and many, many scars. I am a retired, world-famous cancer researcher!!! Everything you know about cancer has come from Big Pharma via Big Media!!! What you hear in Big Media is that cancer is caused by DNA damage and that the cancer treatments of chemotherapy, radiation and surgery (though surgery is useful in some cases) are the best cancer treatments. However, what Big Media doesn't tell you is that the 5-year cure rate of Big Pharma and orthodox medicine, according to their published statistics, is a pathetic 2.1%, meaning 97.9% of their patients are dead in less than 5 years!!! I link to the published documentation in The Truth About Cancer article that I will link to in a moment. On the other hand, herbalists in America (by the way, many herbs kill cancer cells) and homeopaths in Europe were curing cancer for more than 100 years before DNA was discovered in 1953!!!!
If you want to see a very, very short YouTube video (a little over 2 minutes) about the miracles it took for me to get involved in natural cancer treatments, here it is:
If you have even the slightest interest in the truth about cancer, that you will never, never, never hear in Big Media or Big Pharma, please study this article: At the bottom of this home page is an article on cancer on this website and that article will link to the other articles about cancer on this website!! And these articles will tell you how to prevent ever getting cancer and they will again tell you about the experts in Utah who work with cancer patients, anywhere in the world, using natural medicine!!! Also, at the bottom of this home page is a link to an article on Alzheimer's, which I originally wrote, which is actually on another website. This article has an amazing, amazing, amazing YouTube video on Alzheimer's!!! So let's get started talking about the theory of evolution!!! Fasten your seatbelt!!!
|
|
What Does The Word "Evolution" Really Mean??? (A Very Key Section Of This Home Page)The goal and purpose of those who push the theory of evolution can be summarized in four words: there is no God!! As an alternative to God the atheists and evolutionists claim that humans "evolved" from more primative animals (e.g. bonobos). The atheists and evolutionists claim that all animals were created by "evolution," meaning every animal "evolved" from a prior, less sophisticated species. For example, they may say that humans "evolved" from bonobos or chimpanzees or monkeys or some other primate. They say this because they want people to believe there is no God and that Adam and Eve never existed. But there is a major problem with the theory of evolution. The word "evolution" does not represent a tangible object or a physical force that can create things!! Evolution is only a claim or belief that there is no God. Theories and beliefs only exist inside of people's brains, they cannot create physical things, much less create physical things intelligently!!! Only tangible things can create other tangible things!!! Let me repeat that: Only tangible things can create other tangible things!!! Get that through your head: Only tangible things can create other tangible things!!! To say that "humans evolved from bonobos" (or any other pimate) does not describe a tangible object or physical force (much less an intelligent physical force), it only describes a belief that there is no God. "Evolution" and imaginary processes are not tangible and they are not a force in nature such as gravity or wind or sunlight!! "Evolution" does not have a skull or a brain or eyes or ears or legs or a heart!!!
See this excellent webpage on the Types of Forces: Note that the word "evolution" does not appear on that page, nor should it appear!!! In fact, the atheists/evolutionists claim that the imaginary evolution is massively smarter than human beings because human beings cannot sequence the nucleotides for a mouse (without cheating), must less for humans!! But the atheists/evolutionists claim that Donald Duck (i.e. imaginary evolution) created and sequenced the DNA and cells for ten million animal species, one million of which are alive today. By the way, it takes four new DNA strands to create a new species!!! So it took 40,000,000 highly sophisticated DNA stands to create these ten million species!!! And human scientists today do not have the slightest clue how any one of these 40,000,000 DNA strands came to exist or what they are used for!!! Yet they claim that the totally imaginary Mickey Mouse created and designed these 40,000,000 DNA strands!!! To make it even worse for evolution - there is zero evidence of failures in the process of creating these 40,000,000 DNA strands!!! Do you think that Mickey Mouse could create 40,000,000 DNA strands without any errors!!!!! So "evolution" (e.g. which is no more real than Superman) which does not exist, must be billions and billions of times smarter than human beings!!! All of this is nonsense, the word "evolution" is nothing more than a claim or belief that there is no God!! That's it!!! Evolution is not a physical object or a force that can do things, much less do things intelligently (such as sequence the nucleotides on any DNA strand)!! Humans did not "evolve" from other primates any more than humans "evolved" from Donald Duck or Superman because both Donald Duck and Superman and "evolution" are all imaginary things!!! Evolution has no eyes to see, no arms to create cells or DNA, it has no legs to travel, and above all evolution has no brain to design and intelligently sequence the nucleotides on any DNA strand, nor can it create the many millions of different types of cells which were needed for the creation of one million species of animals currently on this planet, much less the nine million extinct animal species, all of which have or had both males and females whose DNA have or had to align in an incredibly precise way and they all have or had unique sets of highly sophisticated cells!!!
How can I make the "evolution" debate any more clear!!!!!! Superman, the tooth fairy, the flying spaghetti monster, the theory of evolution , Mickey Mouse, Donald Duck, etc. are all exactly the same thing - a make-believe fantasy!!! Please explain to me why Donald Duck cannot create and inteligently sequence a single DNA strand but "evolution" can create and intelligently sequence 40 million DNA strands!!! None of the above fantasies can pick up a deck of cards, cook a dinner or design, create and sequence a single DNA strand!!! Donald Duck would be far smarter than "evolution" because Donald Duck has an imaginary brain, but "evolution" doesn't even have an imaginary brain!!! In fact, every time you hear or see the word "evolution" substitute the word "evolution" with the words "Donald Duck." Donald Duck could create and sequence the nucleotides on a new DNA strand, for a new species, just as well as evolution could!!! They are both purely imaginary!! But Donald Duck was smarter because he could talk in English!!! Let us look at this another way: DNA is a physical object therefore only physical objects can create or sequence or resequence a DNA strand!!! In summary, no animal species on this planet has ever evolved from another animal species because "evolution" is nothing more than a Superman comic book!!! Let me say that again: In summary, no animal species on this planet has ever evolved from another animal species because "evolution" is nothing more than a Superman comic book!!!
Mindless AccidentsSo if there is no God, as claimed by the atheists/evolutionists, and if "evolution" has the same imaginary physical features as Superman, Batman and Robin, then what would be the force in nature that created human DNA and the DNA for all other species??? The atheists and evolutionists have no choice except to claim that the Universe, cells, DNA, DNA sequences, etc. were all created by UNINTENTIONAL, DIRECTIONLESS, PURPOSELESS, MINDLESS ACCIDENTS!!! However, the atheists and evolutionists will never use the term "accidents" because they know that no one would believe them if they used the correct word "accidents" instead of the imaginary word "evolution"!!! "Accidents" have no brains!!! Well, neither does Superman or "evolution"!!!! But at least accidents exist. In the context of the theory of evolution, another term for "accidents" is "mistakes"!!! So we humans exist because of God or because of countless billions of mistakes!!! Have you ever heard the phrase: an incredibly intelligent mistake??? That is the ultimate oxymoron!!! In fact, the word "evolution" is nothing but a Superman pipe dream. Furthermore, if accidents did create and sequence the DNA for all extinct and living animals, planets, etc. then accidents are claimed by the atheists/evolutionists to be massively smarter than humans because humans cannot sequence the DNA for a single animal or plant species (without cheating)!!! Nope, God is alive and well. I will talk about where God came from much later in an article called: "Where Did God Come From??" Most of this website is designed to explain why "accidents" (though I almost always use the term "evolution" because this website has been around since about 2004 and I have always used the term "evolution") could not have created a single DNA strand or a single cell on this planet!!!! When you hear or read the word "evolution" you should translate that word into the words: "mindless accidents." The word "mindless" and the word "accidents" and the word "evolution" are all redundant!!! Remember, I will frequently continue to use the term "evolution" but when I do, remember that a more correct term would be "mindless accidents" because "evolution" is not a force in nature much less an intellgient force in nature.
The "Theory Of Evolution" Has A Goal!!!Human beings (athiests and evolutionists) have invented the theory of evolution out of thin air!!! WHY!!!! The theory of evolution debate is about one and only one question: Is there a God??? Or to put it another way: are all humans descended from Adam and Eve (who were created by God) or did all humans "evolve" from some other primate, such as bonobos or chimpanzees or monkeys??? But the evolution debate is much, much more than Adam and Eve versus chimpanzees or monkeys!!!
It is critical to understand that the theory of evolution has a goal to: Let us look at a profound quote about the real purpose of the theory of evolution by the late BYU scholar Robert J. Matthews (who died in 2009) in his, "Origin of Man: The Doctrinal Framework":
Did you notice the phrase: "more than with any other"!!! While the theory of evolution automatically denounces that Heavenly Father and the Holy Ghost exist, THE REAL TARGET of the theory of evolution is the divinity of the Savior Jesus Christ!!! The atheists and evolutionists cannot claim that Christ did not exist, they can only claim that Christ did not perform any miracles. This tactic is exactly what the Book of Mormon predicted would happen in the last days!!! More on this in a moment. You might want to read Professor Matthews' quote two or three times because it describes the very core of the evolution debate and it is razor sharp in accuracy. Professor Matthews made it very, very clear that the theory of evolution was DESIGNED to try and convince people that Heavenly Father and the Holy Ghost do not exist and that while Jesus Christ existed, He was not a God, meaning His mission was not divine!!! Professor Matthews was absolutely correct, the theory of evolution is a tool to convince people that there are no Gods and thus no Godhead!!! And you thought the theory of evolution debate was about science!!! Not A Chance!!! While science is the debate field the goal of the theory of evolution is to convince people that the three members of the Godhead do not exist or in the case of Christ (who no one can deny existed) that He was not a God!!! Note: Links to the www.lds.org website generally have the key versus highlighted or there is a line beside the versus.
In the Book of Mormon (a book about Christ and His prophets which was written mostly in the ancient Americas) the prophet Nephi (the Nephi who wrote 3 Nephi and lived in the fourth century A.D.), knew even back then that some atheists and evolutionists today would claim (for profit) that Christ (who the atheists and evolutionists cannot deny existed because of many ancient records in addition to the Bible e.g. Josephus and Pliny the Younger) did not perform any miracles!!! See 3 Nephi 29:5-7 (especially verse 7): We don't know anything about the "like unto the son of perdition" punishment, but take my advice: a person should not set as a goal to become like unto the son of perdition!!!
If you want even more evidence that Christ was a real person, see this article which goes into much more detail about evidences that Christ was a real person (this article will also be mentioned below): The theory of evolution is not a passive belief, many of the atheists and evolutionists are very proactive in trying to get people to believe there are no Gods!!! The primary purpose of this website is to provide massive scientific evidence that the three members of the Godhead are very much alive and well, and WOW!! are they smart!!!! You will see evidence of God's intelligence over and over and over again on this website!!! The history of the relationship between Christ (i.e. Jehovah) and Lucifer (i.e. satan), began even before Adam and Eve were put on this earth and is described in my article on the Grand Council which I will link to below. So let's start at the beginning. In order to claim that there is no God, the atheists and evolutionists must first claim that Adam and Eve never existed and that humans "evolved" from some other primate, such as bonobos or chimpanzees. So the existence of Adam and Eve is very foundational to the evolution debate!!!
From A Purely Scientific Perspective - Did Adam And Eve Exist???The evolution debate is between the creation scientists/intelligent design people (i.e. scientists who claim there is massive scientific evidence that there is a God) versus the atheists and evolutionists (who claim there is no God). The theory of evolution not only does away with a belief in God but it also does away with a belief in Adam and Eve by claiming that humans "evolved" from some other primate. The creation scientists/intelligent design people (and all religions) claim, by definition, that God created Adam and Eve and that Adam and Eve are on our genealogy chart. The atheists/evolutionists, meaning those who support the theory of evolution (including the authors of biology textbooks in virtually all public schools), claim that God does not exist and that Adam and Eve never existed and that humans "evolved" from some other primate, such as bonobo or chimpanzee or monkey, etc. Darwin is their hero!!! In most biology classrooms you will hear the word "Darwin" a lot more than you will hear the name Adam (if the students ever hear that name at all)!!! So the foundation of the evolution debate is between what is taught in church versus what is taught in almost all public schools!!!!! But what does solid science say about the evolution debate: do we have on our genealogy chart Adam and Eve (as the churches teach) or do we have some bonobo or chimpanzee or monkey couple on our pedigree chart (as the atheists, evolutionists and most public schools teach)??? Let us think about that - which claim is more logical?? If God created Adam and Eve (as all scriptures claim) then Adam and Eve would have had exactly the same DNA structure as modern humans. So zero adjustments to their DNA structure would have been needed for us to exist!!! And God would have created the DNA and cells for all other species, male and female. For example, God would have created the DNA for bonobos and monkeys and chimpanzees and humans individually!!! God did not modify bonobo DNA to make Adam and Eve's DNA!!!! Trust me on that one!!!
In the Bible, the genealogy of Christ is given all the way back to Adam and Eve!!! Christ was the son of God so this is the genealogy of his mother Mary. Joseph and Mary were cousins so they both have essentially the same genealogy. Legally Christ was the son of Joseph, but not literally, so the genealogy starts with Joseph: Note in verse 23 the comment: "as was to be supposed", meaning Christ was not really the son of Joseph, He was the Son of God!!! Noah was also on that list but his name is spelled: "Noe" in verse 36. You are descended from Adam and Eve and also from Noah and his wife. The atheists and evolutionists claim there is no God so the burden is on them to explain where the DNA and cells came from (without God) in order to create ten million animal species (nine million of which are extinct) and the DNA and cells for plants, insects, etc. etc.
What If There Was No Incredibly Intelligent God???The entire foundation of the theory of evolution is the claim that there is no God and that humans "evolved" from some other primate. I will generally use bonobos as our "ancestors" to represent the claims of the atheists and evolutionists. But pick any primate you want. So if humans "evolved" from bonobos (or any other primate), the atheists and evolutionists must explain how bonobo DNA came to exist without God!!! And then they must explain how bonobo DNA, male and female, "evolved" into human DNA, male and female, without God??? Well, actually four bonobo DNA strands would have had to simultaneous mutate (via accidents) into four human DNA strands (in the same latitude, longitude and timeframe) via the mindless accidents of evolution if evolution were true!!! I will talk later about why NEW species need four DNA strands, but existing species only need three DNA strands. Let us start by talking about existing species.
All existing animal species need three types of DNA strands: But creating a new species (either by evolution or God) requires four new and improved DNA strands as I will talk about in detail later because it is a little more complicated. Even scientists today could not convert bonobo DNA into human DNA without cheating because millions of changes to bonobo DNA would be needed, to four bonobo DNA strands, and many of the changes would be related to creating the massively superior human brain!!! Scientists could physically create the DNA strands, but they could not sequence the nucleotides without looking at already existing DNA!!! So how could four bonobo DNA strands be converted into four human DNA strands by nothing but the mindless accidents of evolution???!!! That is one of the key issues in the evolution debate!!! Much will be said on this website about the complete absurdity, for both physical and mathematical reasons, regarding the claims of evolution. The purpose of the evolution doctrine, of course, is to create more atheists and evolutionists who claim there is no God (i.e. who claim there is no Godhead)!!! As I will mention several times on this website, no one can claim that Jesus Christ did not exist because there are many ancient documents, even other than the Bible, which mention Him. Thus, the atheists and evolutionists can only claim that Christ did not perform any miracles (more on this below). In the Mormon religion (i.e. officially The Church Of Jesus Christ Of Latter-Day Saints, founded in 1830), and in some other Christian religions, there are three Gods (Heavenly Father, Jesus Christ and the Holy Ghost). However, some other Christian religions teach there is one God who has three forms (i.e. Heavenly Father, Jesus Christ and the Holy Ghost are the same God).
In the massive, massive Grand Council meeting (your spirit was there and you were very sentient as a spirit), which occurred before Adam and Eve were put on this earth, it was Jehovah (i.e. Christ) versus Lucifer (i.e. now known as the devil). But Adam was clearly Christ's top general!! So the evolution battle today is not much more than a continuation of the Grand Council as it also tries to do away with a belief in the dinivity of Christ and the importance and existence of Adam and Eve!!! Here is a sobering thought: "If satan himself were to design his perfect doctrine today to draw people away from a belief in the Godhead, including the divinity of Christ, it would be the theory of evolution!!! Professor Matthews, who represented the Latter-Day Saint (i.e. Mormon) religion before his death, was absolutely correct!! The theory of evolution is designed to convert people who believe in the divinity of Christ over to people who believe that we "evolved" from lower primates!!! And more importantly, because of the theory of evolution, many people no longer believe in Heavenly Father or in the mission of the Messiah or in the Holy Ghost!!! I can summarize the theory of evolution debate in one sentence: "The theory of evolution exists to convince students and others that bonobos (or some other primate) became humans, meaning evolution exists to convince students that the Godhead does not exist (or in the case of Christ that He was not a God and that He does not exist today because they claim He was not resurrected because He was not a God)!!!" That is precisely what Professor Matthews was saying!!! Schools that teach the theory of evolution are teaching the religion of atheism!!!
Is The Theory Of Evolution (i.e. More Correctly: The Theory of Accidents) A Proven Scientific Fact??A student may ask: isn't the theory of evolution a proven fact of science??? While the atheists/evolutionists may claim the theory of evolution is scientific, in fact it is not a proven scientific fact!!! The entire purpose of this website is to demonstrate, in literally hundreds of different ways, that the theory of evolution is very, very, very bad science!!! For example, if the atheists/evolutionists claim that evolution is true, they must explain how four DNA strands of one or more bonobos, monkeys or apes, etc. (any of these animals would obviously have vastly different DNA than humans) became four human DNA strands using nothing but the mindless accidents of evolution!!! I will talk in detail about why four new and improved DNA strands are needed to create a new species from an old species in a moment. I will also prove below (e.g. in the Sixteen Cells Paradox article), that DNA is not what controls cell divisions!!! Actually, I will mention multiple reasons that DNA cannot be controlling cell divisions. Generally I use bonobos as the direct ancestors of humans, but pick any primate you want. There are both physical issues (physically changing four bonobo DNA strands into four new human DNA strands) and statistical issues (how can four massively complicated and sophisticated bonobo DNA strands accidentally change into four vastly superior and massively more sophisticated human DNA strands)??? As another issue, I can assure you that the set of cell types in a bonobo are vastly different than the set of cell types in a human!!! This is another massive problem for evolution!!! I talk about cells from time to time. So what may start out as a simple question quickly becomes the question: "can the DNA and cells of one species 'evolve' into new and vastly improved DNA and cells to create a new and vastly improved species"?? And this project would have to include both intelligence issues (e.g. intelligently resequencing the nucleotides on four DNA strands to create a single new animal species) and physical reasons (physically changing the DNA and cell types of an existing species [as created by evolution] into the DNA and cell types of a new and improved species). And there have been ten million animal species on this planet, each of which would have needed four new DNA strands to create each species when it first formed. That is forty million DNA strands just for animals and scientists still do not understand a single one of them!!! I should repeat that a million times: That is forty million DNA strands just for animals and scientists still do not understand a single one of them!!! Let me make that very clear: scientists still do not understand a single DNA strand which has ever existed!!! Yet God has created and sequenced 40,000,000 DNA strands with no known errors - just for animals!!! Could the brainless accidents of evolution have created and sequenced 40,000,000 DNA strands with no known errors??? And here is another GIGANTIC problem for the atheists/evolutionists: where are the failures of evolution??? As I demonstrate in other articles: because of the sophistication of the sequence of nucleotides on DNA, if the theory of evolution were true, there would literally be more failures (i.e. more defective DNA strands, such as an invalid sequence of nucleotides, which were not good enough to create a new species) than there are atoms in thousands of Universes like ours!!! Mathematics is not very friendly to the theory of evolution, especially after the discovery of DNA!!! Scientists can create DNA, and that is amazing (bravo), but they cannot sequence the nucleotides without cheating and looking at what God has done!!! Actually, as I will show below: scientists don't have a clue what DNA is used for!!!!! That is one reason they can't decode the sequence of nucleotides on any animal DNA strand!!! I will tell them exactly what DNA is used for, but they won't believe me because I believe in God so I am blacklisted and ignored!!! So by the definition of "evolution," creating new and vastly improved DNA and cells must be done by the mindless accidents of evolution!!! And in order for bonobo DNA to "evolve" into human DNA (for example) four bonobo DNA strands would need to randomly mutate into four vastly superior human DNA strands in the same latitude, longitude and timeframe!!! The more you know the worse the theory of evolution becomes!!! In fact, we could go back much further than bonobos (or apes or whatever) to the "first living cell" which would have been the first life on this planet if evolution were true. In other words, evolution could not have created bonobos first, evolution would have had to start with a single living cell!!! And over time, animals "evolved" which had more and more complex cells and more and more complex DNA. I will talk about the "first living cell" issue below in its own section. So the evolution debate is not so much about how "animals" evolved over time as it is about how "DNA" and cells evolved over time because it is assumed that DNA is what controls cell divisions to create animals. Well, as will be discussed below, the spirit of the animal (even humans) is what primarily controls cell divisions. But the atheists and evolutionists reject that spirits exist or that spirits are required for "life." In fact, I will prove that atheists will NEVER, NEVER, NEVER, NEVER figure out how DNA controls cell divisions because cell divisions are not controlled by DNA at all!!!! But they will ignore me because I believe in God.
States And Evolution (Utah Fails Miserably If This Chart Is Correct)
Before going on I think you might want to see a map on a very pro-evolution website!!! Pay close attention if you live in Utah. This map shows where the school districts are which teach creation science!!!!!! If this map is accurate, schools in Utah teach Darwinism, atheism and evolution far more than they teach that God lives!!! I don't now at what level these decisions are made, but considering that God is very much alive and well, there is a massive amount of really bad science and many really stupid people in Utah!!! But the stupidity is more likely at the district level than the classroom level. The Utah map clearly implies the main decisions are made at the district level. I have a section below called: A Favor. Please respond to that request so I can make my own map some day which will, of course, be passed on to this website (sources will be held totally confidential). NOW THE OFFICIAL THEORY OF EVOLUTION DEBATE BEGINS AT THE SCIENCE LEVEL!!!!!
Cell Biology - Created By God Or By Accidents???As you read this section remember that the theory of evolution is nothing but "mindless accidents" as we have already talked about several times. To begin the scientific issues of the evolution debate, suppose you and a friend were on a hike deep in the forest. You were proud to have traveled so far away from civilization!! Suddenly, as you came over a hill you saw, what looked like to you, a brand-new Buick automobile with its engine running!! Would you think that this Buick was created by an accidental explosion in the forest?? Of course not!! Would you think that a team of monkeys in the forest or at the zoo had created this Buick?? Of course not!! Would you think that this Buick was created by a team of fifth grade children in your local grade school who had snuck out of class one day?? Of course not!! Would you think that the giant assembly line where this Buick was assembled by a gigantic explosion?? Of course not!!! You would think that this Buick was created by human beings in a giant manufacturing plant in Michigan and/or in other states or countries!!! Guess what: Every cell in your body is far, far, far more sophisticated than any automobile or any automobile plant ever made by human beings!!! Let me repeat that: Guess what: Every cell in your body is far, far, far more sophisticated than any automobile or any automobile plant ever made by human beings!!! Human beings are not even remotely capable of creating anything as sophisticated as a cell, much less a living cell!!! Before going on I need to define the phrase: "irreducibly complex system." An "irreducibly complex system on the cellular level" is, by definition, a sequence of complex chemical reactions in a cell, such that if any one of the chemical reactions was not there, or failed, the end result of that chemical reaction will fail and the entire cell may be at risk!!! Here is a quote from a book called "Evolution: A Theory In Crisis" by creationist (i.e. anti-evolutionist) Michael Denton:
He is essentially saying that accidents could not have created any living cell!!! I should add that there are many millions of different kinds of cells which have existed, or currently exist, on this planet!!! And he was talking about what is going on inside of every cell in your body!!! Yes, every cell in your body is far, far more sophisticated than any automobile ever made!!! Needless to say: humans cannot create a single living cell!!!! Even if a cell was the size of a beachball, all of the scientists on this planet could not create a living cell!!! Guess what, most of the cells in your body can divide into two cells, each with the above sophistication!!! Try dividing a new automobile into two new automobiles by one team of strong men pulling on the front bumper and another team of strong men pulling on the back bumper!!! Even if they were successful at pulling the car apart they would not end up with two cars, they would end up with two worthless halves of a single car!! But when cells divide, there are two perfectly healthy cells!!!! As another example of the sophistication of cells, the number of brain cells, and the skull that protects the brain, both grow in size until adulthood. Be glad that the size of our skull and the size of our brain do not quit growing until we reach adulthood!! And be glad they quit growing then!!! Well, I suspect that most of our intelligence comes from our spirit. If our intelligence came from our DNA then there would be no need for Judgment Day because we would not have any free agency. Let's talk more about cell divisions starting with a fertilized egg. Now we are going to talk about some serious mathematics!!!
How Many Unique Types Of Cells Have There Been???Humans are far more complex than you think!!! Humans have between 200 and 326 different types of cells (depending on the source, I will use the 326 number) which must be in just the right place in our bodies as the fetus is morphing from a single fertilized ovum!!! How would you like your bone cells to end up in the pupils of your eyes??? You would be blind!!!
Now consider that there have been 10,000,000 animal species on this planet, extinct and living. If we count male and female types of cells (that is 4 for each species, 2 for the male and 2 for the female), and if we assume that every species has 200 different types of cells which are unique to that species, male and female, that is 8,000,000,000 unique types of cells just for all animal species!!! And just like DNA, scientists do not fully understand a single one of these cell types even though thousands of scientists (who are really, really smart by the way) have PhD degrees in Cell Biology!! Yet scientists don't have much of a clue how any cell works!!! At what point do we throw the theory of evolution into a trash can?? Well, wait until I start talking about permutations of nucleotides on DNA!!! Then you can throw it away!!! This website will focus on the scientific issues in this debate but I will tell you how the story ends now: the theory of evolution cannot be true primarily because of the discovery of DNA in 1953 plus the ongoing discoveries about the sophistication of cells and many other issues (e.g. the physical constants)!!! Those who claim that evolution is true must deal with both the mathematical issues and the physical issues of how the DNA and cells of one species can be changed (i.e. via brainless evolution) into vastly superior DNA and cell types, so that a new and improved species can be created (defining a "species" as an animal with a specific DNA sequence/structure and a unique set of cell types) by evolution!!! As you will see, the theory of evolution is not a credible theory after the discovery of DNA and the sophistication of cells!!! Let us expand greatly on what we have just talked about!!! In this case, your calculator is no where close to having enough digits to deal with big enough numbers I will talk about!!! So get out your pencil and paper.
Creating A Human Via Cell DivisionsA new human baby starts out as a single fertilized egg (a fertilized ovum) and ends up, via cell divisions, with 37.2 trillion cells!!! This new baby has roughly 326 different kinds of cells some of which are transparent or the baby could not see!!! The location throughout their body (or your body) of these 326 different types of cells is critical to their (i.e. your) survival!!! So for 37.2 trillion cells the correct type of cell (out of the 326 different types of cells) must end up in exactly the right location at the right time!!! You probably already did the math, that is 12,127,200,000,000,000 decisions/permutations (more than 12 quadrillion) as to which type of cell ends up in which location of a human baby!!! And this number is not even a single drop of water in the oceans of planets in trillions of Universes like ours as one of the numbers in the permutations of nucleotides article!!! Here is my point: human DNA is only 3,200,000,000 nucleotides long. Sorry, human DNA is no where near long enough to control these 12 quadrillion cell divisions!!! There are actually mutiple reasons that human DNA cannot control cells divisions. And every one of the ten million animal species which have lived on this planet also needed many different types of cells to be placed in the right location at the right time as the baby morphs from a single fertilized egg to a baby!!! And don't forget that both males and females, of every species, have specialized cells that the other sex does not have!!! In my Sixteen Cells Paradox, which is linked to below, I will provide another proof that DNA cannot be controlling cell divisions and I will discuss what is controlling the cell divisions!!! Are human bodies the result of accidents?? Not a chance!!! However God did it, He had to do it!!! Humans are just one of ten million types of species which have existed, or currently exit, on this planet and each animal species needed their own unique set of cell types in just the right place at the right time as the fetus is morphing (male and female)!!! You are going to have to think very hard about this next paragraph, it deals with a very sophisticated issue and there is no simple way to explain this (you may have to read the next paragraph 3 or 4 times very slowly): This also means, because humans start out as a single type of cell (the fertilized egg), that, whether evolution is true or not, in many, many cases, during cell divisions, a single type of cell, when it divides, will end up as two different kinds of cells (one of which could be similar to the previously existing type - and the other one is a new type of cell or both cells could be new types of cells)!!! How does that happen??? How can a single, incomprehensible type of cell divide and end up as two new and different kinds of cells or at least one new type of cell (which would be required for a single fertilized egg to become a human being)??? To control where these different types of cells end up in the body is far, far, far beyond human comprehension when considering the sophistication of cells!!! In addition, there is no way that the 3,200,000,000 nucleotides on human DNA could control the creation of, and location of, 12,127,200,000,000,000 combinations of cell types in which cell location!!! Sorry atheists, your spirit is alive and well and God is alive and well!!! This not only applies to ten million animal species, but to plants and insects, etc. which also need their types of cells!!! Every type of cell in your body, and every type of cell which has ever existed, is sophisticated beyond human comprehension!!! Thousands of very, very smart scientists (and I mean really, really, really smart scientists) have a PhD degree in either Cell Biology or Microbiology or Genetics. Every cell in your body is vastly more sophisticated than any automobile or airplane ever made!!! PhDs in Cell Biology and Microbiology and Genetics are still being given out to each new generation of scientists as more and more is learned about the sophistication of the many different kinds of cells!!! To get a PhD you must make some new discovery about cells. Any of these types of scientists could write a website dozens of times bigger than this website containing thousands of reasons that Cell Biology and Microbiology, etc. by themselves, are a massive, massive proof that God is alive and well and that He is INCREDIBLY SMART!!! This will become more and more obvious the more you study this website. The problem is that no one would understand their articles unless they had at least a couple of years of Cell Biology or Microbiology classes!!! These scientists are incredibly smart, but unfortunataly many of them know they are very smart and they have egos far, far bigger than their brains!!! While they can prove that God lives, unfortunately, many of them are so proud that they mock anyone who believes in God!!! Pride may be the main reason that so many people believe in the theory of evolution!!! Many people cannot tolerate that someone else (i.e. God) could be smarter than they are!!! After all, does God have a PhD in Cell Biology?? Well, God is a billion times smarter than any PhD in Cell Biology because He sequenced the DNA and created the cells, and placed the cells, for every living and extinct thing!!! Getting back to evolution, sometimes you see drawings or pictures which seem to show an "evolution" of species from one species to another. But if you look at the DNA and cell types and locations of these animals the theory of evolution falls apart because it is obvious that the DNA and cell types of one species could not have "evolved" into new and improved DNA and cell types for a new and improved species of animal!!! I don't have a clue as to how many different kinds of cells there are (or have been) for the one million living species of animals, the nine million extinct animal species, plants, insects and who knows what other kinds of living things there are, or have been, on this planet.
The Scriptures Predicted The Coming Forth Of The Theory Of Evolution!!While the word "evolution" cannot be found in the scriptures (the word did not exist in ancient times), the scriptures certainly predicted the theory of evolution was coming!!! Was God surprised when Darwin's theory of evolution (Darwin's first book came out in 1859) started to convince people that there was no God?? Of course not!!! God is never surprised by anything. Both the Bible and the Book of Mormon (the Book of Mormon is also an ancient book written by ancient prophets, but it was written by a different group of prophets than the Bible) prepared the children of God for the coming of the theory of evolution. The last prophet in Book of Mormon times (Moroni) completed the Book of Mormon in 421 A.D.. Most of the Book of Mormon was written in the Americas. It was first translated and published (by the modern prophet Joseph Smith) in 1830, which was 29 years before Darwin's first book came out in 1859. So the Book of Mormon was not reacting to the theory of evolution because it was published 29 years before Darwin's first book was published!!!
Because the Book of Mormon was written by prophets it makes it very clear that God created Adam and Eve. For example, see 2 Nephi 2:17-27: In the Book of Mormon there is a story where satan, before the birth of Christ, appears to a man named Korihor and satan himself taught Korihor that Christ would never exist. Korihor was then teaching the doctrines of satan to others. See verse 60 in the reference in the next paragraph. This was in about 55 B.C..
The great Book of Mormon prophet Alma the Younger was not amused by Korihor's teachings that Christ would never be born. As a response to Korihor's demand for a "sign" that God lived, the prophet Alma the Younger (via the priesthood) commanded Korihor to be struck dumb (Alma 30: 46-60)!!! That was God's sign to Korihor, so God did show Korihor a sign!!! But it was not the type of sign that Korihor wanted!!!
That should give you an idea of what God (via one of His prophets) thinks about the theory of evolution (i.e. the claim there is no God, such as the future birth of Christ in this case). And it should also tell you that satan does not support his own followers and in the end he drags them down to hell (if they do not repent in time)!!! Here is an article on that event: The theory of evolution today is satan's perfect doctrine because it was designed to do away with a belief in the Godhead by claiming that God (i.e. Heavenly Father) and the Holy Ghost do not exist. The atheists and evolutionists cannot claim that Jesus Christ did not exist because there are many ancient documents, even other than the Bible, which mention Him as I already mentioned. So the atheists and evolutionists can only claim that Christ did not perform any miracles, such as the raising of the dead and His own resurrection. The Book of Mormon predicted this precise bahavior as I will show in the next section!!
The Scriptures And The Divinity Of ChristEven during the life of Christ, converting people away from the mission and doctrines of Christ (which is essentially what the theory of evolution was designed to do) was not appreciated by God. Here is a quote from the Bible (Christ was speaking to the people in His day, but what He said applies today just as well!!): Matthew 10:33: "33 But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father which is in heaven."
That is a warning from a member of the Godhead!!! Here is the original source: Here is another example from Matthew: Matthew 18:6-7: "6 But whoso shall offend one of these little one's which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea. 7 Woe unto the world because of offences! for it must needs be that offences come; but woe to that man by whom the offence cometh!
Here is the original source:
The Book of Mormon is nowhere near as diplomatic as the Bible as we already saw with Alma the Younger and Korihor!!! It gets worse!! The Book of Mormon also talks about a punishment called: "like unto the son of perdition" (3 Nephi 29:5-7). There are very specific criteria for that punishment that I talk about in other articles (pay close attention to the phrase "like unto the Son of Perdition"): Even though the "like unto the son of perdition" category is likely a subcategory of the Telestial Kingdom, any punishment with the words "son of perdition" as part of the category is not something that someone should set as a goal to achieve!!! Verse 7 is an amazing verse because the prophet Nephi knew that the people in the last days would know that Christ existed so he knew the wicked people in the last days could only criticize the claims of the miracles of Christ!!!
This is an article about why verse 7 is amazing in the way it was written (IMPORTANT NOTE: this article has links to two excellent websites which list many ancient documents [other than the Bible] which talk about Christ being a real person):
Well, it gets worse. Here is a reference in the Old Testament for the phrase: "Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!":
See also: 2 Timothy 5:20:
In the Book of Mormon, the Book of Mormon is quoting the chapter in Isaiah that I just mentioned OK, let's get back to the theory of evolution.
The Five Most Important Articles On This Website (Which Are About Evolution)Not every article which exposes the absurdity of the theory of evolution are equal in terms of powerfully eliminating the theory of evolution from the realms of reality and credibility. These are five of the most important articles on this website!!!
The First Article: Changing The Length Of A DNA Strand By Evolution/Accidents Is ImposibleThe very foundation of the theory of evolution is that one species can "evolve" into a new and improved species. But with the discovery of DNA the new paradigm of the atheists/evolutionists must be that the DNA of one species can be changed into the DNA of a new and improved species. But this implies that the DNA for one species can be changed into the DNA of another species while the DNA is inside of a cell!!!
DNA is ALWAYS inside of cells!!! This article proves that changing a DNA strand, while the DNA is inside of a cell, is impossible because there is nothing inside of a cell which can change the sequence of nucleotides on a DNA strand, nor are there any extra nucleotides in any cell which can be used to increase the length of an existing DNA strand to create a new species with longer DNA, etc.:
The Second Article: Permutations - The Ultimate Death Of The Theory Of EvolutionThe Second Article is about specific sequences of nucleotides on a DNA strand. A specific sequence of nucleotides is called a "permutation" of nucleotides. Think of the DNA of an animal in the same way that you think of the object code of a computer program. Without a viable sequence of '0's and '1's a compiled computer program would not operate. A unique sequence of '0's and '1's (i.e a compiled computer program) could also be called a unique permutation of '0's and '1's. Likewise, the ordering of nucleotides on a DNA strand (i.e. the "permutation" of nucleotides) determines whether the baby animal will be a horse or a human or a robin or a snake. In other words, each species has a sequence of nucleotides that will create (along with the spirit of the animal) an animal via cell divisions after conception. A "unique sequence" of nucleotides (for a specific species) and a "unique permutation" of nucleotides (for a specific species) mean exactly the same thing!!!! But with DNA I will not always use the words "sequence of nucleotides" rather I will almost always use the term "permutation of nucleotides." Without a viable sequence/permutation of nucleotides on their DNA strands, no animal on this planet could exist!! But "evolution" does not have a brain, so how could the mindless accidents of evolution create incredibly precise permutations of nucleotides for the roughly nine million animal species which have lived on this planet but are extinct or the one million animal species which currently live on this planet??? THEY CAN'T!!!!!!!! Permutations Of Nucleotides On DNA - The Ultimate Death Of The Theory of Evolution
The Third Article: The Sixteen Cells ParadoxSome time ago I was simulating in my head the cell divisions after an ovum was fertilized. When I got to the new human baby having sixteen cells something struck me: if the DNA in all sixteen of these cells were identical to the DNA in the fertilized egg (which would obviously be the case) and if DNA were the only thing controlling the cell divisions then each of these sixteen cells would lead to the new baby having 1 head, 2 arms, 2 legs, etc.!!! The new baby would therefore have sixteen heads, 32 arms, 32 legs, etc. In reality, a human being starts out as a single fertilized egg and via many trillions of cell divisions, a human baby is born nine-months later with one head, two arms, two legs, etc!!! The math simply doesn't make any sense!!!
The Sixteen Cells Paradox article PROVES THAT DNA CANNOT BE THE MAIN THING THAT IS CONTROLLING THE CELL DIVISIONS!!!! And this article explains WHAT THE PRIMARY THING IS THAT IS CONTROLLING THE CELL DIVISIONS!!!! Does this mean that spirits have cells??? I don't know, but spirits must be made of something. The "Sixteen Cells Paradox" applies to all animals (male and female), not just humans. So all animals have a spirit to control cell divisions!! This should not surprise anyone because all living things require a spirit for life!!! So it is efficient for Heavenly Father to create the spirit (though sometimes you read in LDS literature that spirits are not created, they have existed forever) so that the spirit can both create life and control the cell divisions. And spirits come from God!!! This can explain why the DNA of male sperm cells and female sperm cells can align with each other - because DNA is a database of information, not a computer program to control cell divisions!!!! It would be much more difficult to align a new computer program on each of four new and improved DNA strands than to change the databases in four new and improved DNA strands; though I am sure God could do either of these things. But remember that I have already pointed out that there are no where near enough nucleotides on human DNA to control the cell divisions for a new baby!!! But I can assure you that Heavenly Father does not modify DNA, He designs it from scratch or He assigns someone else to design and build it from scratch. So the length of the DNA strand is largely, if not entirely, dependent on the size of the database on the DNA!! This is why the above DNA strands can align with each other, because the database "fields" can align. So if two animal species have the same size DNA, it has little or nothing to do with the size and shape of the species (it has to do with the size of their databases). And this also destroys the theory of evolution because each species will have its own unique spirit and thus its own unique database (on their DNA). But the theory of evolution rejects the existence of spirits (and thus it rejects that we will live after death). So the atheists and evolutionists have a major problem. They don't believe in God therefore they don't believe in spirits (i.e. they only believe in evolution). Therefore, they must explain the "Sixteen Cells Paradox" without mentioning spirits!!!
Yes, humans have spirits. When we die our spirit stays on this planet (well, we actually can go to another planet if we wish). Here is an article on the LDS website (using quotes by Brigham Young) about the spirit world: My wife has been in the spirit world since May of 2016, and I used to be an ordinance worker in the Kansas City Temple, so I could add a lot of things to that article!!! So could Brigham Young because he has been in the spirit world for many decades as a major church leader. More on the spirit world later in its own section. To dig deeper, the spirit controls the cell divisions and the size of the DNA will be largely (if not entirely) dependent on the size of the database, meaning the size of the individual database elements (e.g. "fields") on the DNA strand!! The largest DNA strand on this planet, and it is much, much larger than human DNA, is for a fish, protopterus aethiopicus, which has 133 billion nucleotide pairs on its DNA!!! Why a fish has such a gigantic database I do not know. Maybe this type of fish has an unusually high number of different types of cells - I don't know. Let me briefly talk about "life." Scientists have tried to create life from non-life. They will NEVER be successful unless God cooperates and provides a spirit. I do not know if each bacteria has its own spirit or whether there is some general spirit for single-celled living things. I talk more about "What Is Life?" in a section later on. Humans, and all other species, exist because of God!!! Yes, science has confirmed that the Biblical account of Adam and Eve IS TRUE!!! Your genealogy chart has Noah and his wife (some Bible scholars think her name was Naamah) on it and Adam and his wife Eve on it!!! In other words, Adam and Eve are on mine and your genealogy chart, not some bonobo couple!!! Try saying that in some college biology class!!! I would do it, but then I am an ex-Marine and Viet Nam veteran so everyone would be polite to an old man who went to war and got blown up while on patrol. As an ex-Marine, Viet Nam veteran, I love these next two amazing YouTube videos about the "fallen" in war.
Here is an incredible, incredible, incredible six minute YouTube video showing military cemeteries around the world (as they say: war is hell):
Here is another YouTube video for the fallen (an incredible video):
Here is another video (4 minutes) about man's inhumanity to man (read the words of the YouTube video):
Here is another sad song:
- This Section Will Absolutely Blow Your Mind!!!! The Fourth Article: The Two-Male DNA Alignment IssueTime after time after time I have demonstrated the amazing intelligence of God!!! This section is just another example of the supreme intelligence of God. After reading this section you will know that God is very much alive and well and that He is incredibly smart!!! There is no way that accidents or even humans could do this!!! This section will make the theory of evolution look exponentially worse than anything I have already described (it is another permutation issue)!!! Let us look at the two types of male DNA strands in the sperm cells for any animal species. One creates a male baby and one creates a female baby. Both of them must align with a female DNA strand in her ovum. But if each of them aligns with the same female DNA strand in the ovum (at the function level of course), this implies that the two types of male DNA must align with each other (at the function level, not the nucleotide level), yet one will lead to a male baby and one will lead to a female baby!!!! There is no specific reason that the two types of male DNA strands need to align with each other at the function level except for the fact that BOTH OF THEM must align with the same female DNA strand at the function level!! Here is the amazing thing: two male DNA strands must align with each other (at the function level but not at the nucleotide level), yet one of them will create a male baby and one of them will create a female baby!!! This is incomprehensible!!! Yet this fact applies to roughly 1,000,000 animal species which are currently on this planet and 9,000,000 extinct species of animals!!! This is yet another reason that spirits must be involved in cell divisions for a new baby and a reason why DNA must primarily be a database!!!
But I want to show this somewhat graphically to emphasize my point. There are three kinds of DNA strands, for every existing species, which must align with each other at the function level: All three of these kinds of DNA are very, very different yet they must align with each other at the function level!!
Now let us ignore the third item in the above list and show the list again: What this means is that the two types of DNA in the male, one of which creates a male baby and one of which creates a female baby, must align with each other at the function level because both of them must align with the gender-neutral DNA in the female ovum at the function level!!!! Yet one of these DNA strands will lead to a male baby and the other DNA strand will lead to a female baby!!! This is insane!!! But note that this concept applies to one million living animal species and nine million extinct animal species!!!! Two male DNA strands must align with each other at the function level, yet one will create a male baby and the other will create a female baby!!! NO WAY!!!!! But God has done this for ten million animal species, one million of which are alive today!!! God must be really, really busy!!! And I am sure that is precisely why God designed DNA to be a database!!! Two databases are much easier to align than the object code of two computer programs!!!
OK, well no one believes that this is a major reason evolution cannot be true (even though my first college degree was in mathematics), so here is a homework assignment tonight for human scientists. For some extinct species for which they only have (or a living species if the sequence of nucleotides in the male sperm cells, to create a female baby, is withheld from the scientists):
The task of scientists (or accidents if you believe in evolution) is to design, sequence and create, without cheating: Good luck!!! I was born in 1946 so I am not going to live long enough for that to happen!!! Nor will my great-grandchildren live long enough (I don't have any yet, but I will soon)!!! I can assure you, given this assignment, that scientists would be delighted to learn that DNA is a database!!! In fact, scientists are NOT EVEN CLOSE to decoding the entire DNA strand of any species of plants, animals or insects!!! I don't think that knowing that DNA is a database (instead of a computer program) would help them very much. God is a tough act to follow!!! But no matter what most scientists read they are too proud to admit that a God could exist who is massively smarter than they are!!!! I suspect that proud ants think they are smarter than humans.
The Fifth Article - Kehr's Paradox
To make things worse for evolution there is another article that I should mention which talks about simple statistics. I call these mathemtatical issues for the theory of evolution Kehr's Paradox:
The Theory of Evolution Battle In The Schools
Someone should take a survey of students in any school district in any state and ask two simple questions: I would love to see the results!!! Remember, it was probably Adam (back then named "Michael") who cast Lucifer (now "satan") out of the Grand Council!!! So they knew each other very well!!! Lucifer's favorite "theory" is the theory of evolution!!! Unfortunately, the imaginary, atheistic "theory of evolution" is taught in many schools, from middle school to college. I guess that no one in these schools has heard of DNA yet. Yes, schools are teaching religion (meaning the religion of atheism/evolution). Well, at least the biology textbooks that they use typically support the theory of evolution.
As the Book of Mormon says: they are "puffed up because of their learning, and their wisdom, and their riches." Here is the reference: The main exceptions of teaching atheism/evolution in schools, of course, are schools funded and operated by religious groups which typically do not teach the theory of evolution. In fact, many, many young people today go to church on the weekends and they are told there is a God, but during the week in school they may be taught that the theory of evolution is true and there is no God. Darwin is worshipped in many schools. Because of the teaching of the theory of evolution (i.e. the religion of atheism) in schools, many, many young people of all religions (starting in middle school in many cases) have lost their faith in God and have quit going to church, or if they are taken to church by their parents, they will go to church but they will not believe anything they hear!!! That is the very goal and purpose of the theory of evolution - to convince people that there is no God. "Creation science" or "creationism" or "intelligent design" are scientific claims that God lives. Teaching "creation science" is not the same thing as endorsing a specific religion. "Creation science" is purely scientific and generic (i.e. it does not favor any religion) in proving that there is a God without endorsing any specific religious denomination. There are people in all religions who teach and/or endorse creation science. So there should be nothing wrong with teaching intelligent design in schools because it rock solid science and does not endorse any specific religious denomination. Those who argue that the theory of evolution should be taught in schools may claim that all scientists are evolutionists. However, the theory of evolution is NOT universally accepted by all scientists!! Such a claim is absurd!!! While there are hundreds of books which have been written to push the theory of evolution; there are almost certainly hundreds of books which have been written against the theory of evolution!! Four of these books are free and are on this website. Plus, in the scientific community, among those who have not written books, there are many scientists who are very much against the theory of evolution!!! Those who believe that the scientific evidence strongly supports a belief in God are called "creation scientists" or "intelligent design" supporters. The well-known and respected creation scientist Kent Hovind describes the atheists this way: "The atheists can't find God for the same reason a thief can't find a policeman." That quote hits the nail on the head!!! Pride is the underlying, undergirding, driving force of the theory of evolution, it is certainly not science!!!! Many people want to be considered to be the smartest being in the Universe. They want to be considered sophisticated!!! And more importantly they want to be popular!!! The atheists/evolutionists don't want to find God because of pride!!! If there was only one reason the super-atheists exist, it is pride!!! Pride is a massive, massive problem in some colleges!!! Many college students and professionals have massive, massive, massive problems with pride which is precisely why they do not believe in God!!! It is not "cool" to believe in God in many schools because God would be smarter than they are!!! While they are puffed up because of what they understand about cells; they fail to appreciate that God designed and created every type of cell that has ever existed on this planet!!! The students in many schools who believe in God may be mocked as being "unsophisticated." It is pride which drives people like Richard Dawkins into being a prime candidate for the "like unto the son of perdition" category. Such people cannot accept that some ancient carpenter (i.e. Christ) could be better than they are!!! They forget that He was the first person to be resurrected on this planet!! The very fuel that drives the theory of evolution and atheism is pride!!!! But the key point is that the theory of evolution is nothing but atheism in disguise. So any school which teaches evolution is teaching the religion of atheism in their school!!! Now only that, they are teaching REALLY, REALLY, REALLY BAD SCIENCE!!! Later on this home page I will have a section called: Measuring The Damage Caused By The Theory of Evolution which talks about creationist Ken Ham's research on the damage done by the theory of evolution to the young people of his evangelical faith (I am a Latter-Day Saint). He demonstrates that the destruction of a testimony in God begins in middle school in many cases!!!
|
|
Modern Prophets and Apostles (Meaning Living Prophets and Apostles)!!!The Church Of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (a.k.a. the "Mormon" church because of our belief that the Book of Mormon was written by ancient Christian prophets, one of whom was named Mormon) claims to have a living prophet and usually 14 living apostles (two of whom are in the First Presidency with the prophet). All 15 of these men are sustained by the members of the church as "prophets, seers and revelators".
Here is a web page on a different website which is generally up-to-date (focus on the bottom section of the page for those with birth dates - these fifteen apostles are very much alive): To no one's surprise, even living prophets and apostles have been critical of the theory of evolution. In a moment I will link to a talk given by a living apostle, Elder Jeffrey R. Holland, who is on the list I just mentioned, from a speech given at Brigham Young University. But before you watch that speech I need to talk about the word "secularism" or you will not understand much of what he talks about.
Let me quote one of the definitions of "secularism": "The indifference to, or rejection or exclusion of, religion and religious considerations. As a philosophy, secularism seeks to interpret life on principles taken solely from the material world, without recourse to religion." Secularism does not mock religion, but it is atheism on steroids!!! Elder Holland's talk is against secularism!!! Elder Holland wants governments to be more and more connected to religion. Not any specific religion because missionaries of all religions should be welcome in every country (this is called "freedom of religion", which the LDS church strongly supports)!!! Elder Holland mentions many great people over the centuries who have, in some cases, given their lives to spread a belief in God and/or in a belief in freedom of religion. In his speech he talks a lot about many great people!!! But in this talk he also mentioned by name four of the best-known atheists/evolutionists!! But he did not say anything good about them. Here is a quote from Elder Holland's speech and a link to the speech. (Note: if you click on the blue link below the quote, and if you then click the triangle/arrow link on that page (on the BYU website) - you can both watch and read his amazing speech at the same time. I should mention there are some graphic statues in this video which might be too intense for high school students - his talk was given at BYU.
Everyone should watch this video at least 2 or 3 times!!! The reason is that this website is focused on atheism and evolution versus creation science and intelligent design, whereas Elder Holland's talk is at the very different level of religion versus secularism!!! That is a topic that everyone needs to clearly understand!! As I just quoted, in this talk he mentioned by name four of the most well-known atheists/evolutionists (e.g. Richard Dawkins). I should mention that the Book of Mormon was published in 1830, more than 110 years before Richard Dawkins was born!!! The Book of Mormon was published 29 years before Darwin's first book was published!!! Yes, God didn't like the theory of evolution long before Charles Darwin and Richard Dawkins came along!!! All four of the men mentioned by Elder Holland easily fit the criteria for becoming "like unto the Son of Perdition." However, this is such a horrific punishment that only God can make the final determination!!! For example, some of the scores of people who currently fit into this category today may repent and be forgiven. Others may not cross the line. God is the only judge. If I had to summarize the main point in Elder Holland's talk in one paragraph, this is what I would say: "Religion has been the driving force for good throughout the centuries and the proper role of government is to preserve and protect freedom of religion for all religions!!! In some instances, a religion needs to be protected from another religion which has political power (or from non-religious groups)!!! Governments should not take sides in such a dispute but should make sure that no religion is harmed in any way by those in the other religion (or non-religious group)." The original prophets who wrote the Book of Mormon finished writing the Book of Mormon in 421 A.D.!!! So even before 421 A.D. God knew that people like Richard Dawkins would exist in the last-days. My point is that mocking the Savior (who no one can deny existed) and His miracles, along with claiming that there is no Heavenly Father, is potentially a very, very serious sin. Especially if it is done for profit!!! The "evolution debate" is not an entertaining side-show, it deals with very serious issues in the eyes of God which Christ Himself implied!!! In Darwin's defense, while scientists in his day knew about cells, they knew nothing about what is going on inside of cells and certainly nothing about DNA (which was not discovered until 1953 by Watson and Crick). Two of the most-deserved Nobel prizes in history were given for the discovery of DNA. Francis Crick and James Watson won the Nobel prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1962.
Here is another wonderful talk by Elder Holland, this time about faith and it was given in General Conference. Read/listen to the entire speech but pay close attention to the phrase: "That must be terribly frustrating to Him, but He deals with it." (click the triangle in the photograph):
Before going on, and for future reference if you are interested, here is a web page with the entire Origin of Species. I include this link so that his first book can be searched for key words if you wish to do that:
Secular Humanism And HumanismActually Elder Holland's talk was very diplomatic compared to what he could have talked about. "Secular Humanism" or just "Humanism," which Elder Holland did not talk about, is even worse than "secularism." Here is Wikipedia's take on secular humanism: "Secular humanism, or simply humanism, is a philosophy or life stance that embraces human reason, ethics, and philosophical naturalism while specifically rejecting religious dogma, supernaturalism, pseudoscience, and superstition as the basis of morality and decision making." Note that secular humanism is more pro-active at attacking the existence of God than the theory of evolution. Essentially, this philosophy replaces God with man!!! So it not only rejects any God, it replaces God with humans and makes humans the supreme beings in the Universe!!! A major problem with this philosophy is that all of the scientists on this planet combined cannot sequence the DNA for any animal species (without cheating)!!! That is hardly the qualifications for replacing God with humans!!! It is all in their minds!!! If secular humanism were true there would not be any living thing on this planet (certainly not humans, including atheists), even secular humanists!!!!!!!
In short: President Dallin Oaks, now in the First Presidency of the church, gave a talk in General Conference where he talked about "secular humanism" called: "Stand As A Witness of God" in the Ensign, March 2015.
Sometimes you need to have an account with the LDS church to read old speechs so I cannot guarantee you will be able to see the talk (Section: Secular Humanism). I actually met President Oaks more than 50 years ago when he was in what we call a: Stake Presidency in the Chicago area. He went out of his way to talk to a very new member of the LDS church!! He is the one of the nicest people I have ever met!!! In fact, two of the nicest people I have ever met in person were President Oaks and President Monson (a deceased president of the LDS church). Both of these men could not be any nicer!!! I am sure other apostles are very nice, but I haven't met them. I used to work for "church security" so I have actually met 7 of the apostles over the years. The two men I just mentioned were cleearly the nicest of that small group.
Philosophical NaturalismI want to enphasize a concept. Secularism and philosophical naturalism are close cousins. Author and attorney Phillip E. Johnson (a very good man who I do not think is LDS) explains the hidden agenda of the evolutionists:
Read that quote two or three times, it is an amazing statement. The atheists and evolutionists have an agenda, it is just a matter of collecting the tools to achieve their goals of getting converts!!!
A Summary List Of The False Doctrines Of EvolutionThe theory of evolution is not just an abberation of true religion, it is essentially a mirror-image of true religion!!!
Here is a key point to remember, the theory of evolution is satan's perfect doctrine because evolution does away with a belief in:
The atheists and evolutionists also do not believe that all living things have a spirit, so they do not believe in: The atheists can't get anything right!!! Atheism and evolution are very, very myopic and their followers only believe in what they can see and some obvious things.
The theory of evolution is a mirror-image of the doctrines of The Church of Jesus Christ Of Latter-Day Saints (and to a large degree every other Christian church). Here is an article on that subject (this article has a chart which compares, side-by-side, the doctrines of the LDS church - and some of the doctrines of many other churches - versus the doctrines of the theory of evolution):
Another article which digs into these issues is the First Book article which identifies three different places in the Book of Mormon where the theory of evolution is predicted; but the word "evolution" could not be used in the Book of Mormon because the word did not exist in ancient times. Nor did the word exist when the Book of Mormon was first published in 1830 in America as far as I know (Darwin's first book came out in 1859 in England):
Changing the subject, Elder Holland also gave one the great talks, in 1997, specifically for those who feel unworthy of the blessings of God. This is an amazing talk for anyone as we all have our "bad days"!!! (In this case click the arrow inside his picture to read and hear his talk at the same time)
For those who think their faith is weak compared to their trials (that is pretty much all of us), here is another talk by Elder Holland (again click the arrow inside his picture to read and hear his talk at the same time) OK, let's get back to talking about the credibility of the theory of evolution!!!
Physics: The Big Bang, Astronomy, The Universe, Physical Constants, Etc.The article I will link to in a moment is one of those articles that was written to keep this home page from getting way too long. It has a lot of information in it.
This section has a link to an article that discusses six major topics about everything from the Big Bang to (the super genius Nichola Tesla) Tesla Physics:
This article is REQUIRED READING AND CONSIDER IT TO BE PART OF THE HOME PAGE. This article contains SOME OF THE BEST REASONS the theory of evolution is nonsense!!! For example, it links to an article on Astronomy:
While I link to the Astronomy article in the prior article, I would also like to add a link here due to its importance:
My Top Reasons The Theory Of Evolution (i.e. the Theory That There Is No God) Cannot Be TrueWhile there are many categories of reasons why the theory of evolution cannot be true: these are my top 6 reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true (i.e. the claim that God does not exist is false)!!! Well, every person would have their own list of top reasons.
1) The Big Bang!!! This actually includes three levels of issues: 2) Viable permutations of nucleotides (i.e. the number of possible ways to sequence 40 million DNA strands just for animals)!!! 3) The Two-male DNA alignment issue for all animal species!!! 4) The sophistication of all of the different kinds of cells which have been or are on this planet (for all species of all living things), then an extension of this issue (the next item): 5) The combination of how many different types of cells exist (for all species) and the sophisticated locations of each of the types of cells as each animal is created during cell divisions (i.e. from a single fertilized egg into the morphing of the baby to the birth of the baby) for every animal species. 6) The physical constants, and their incomprehensible accuracy, such as the Mass and Energy Of The Early Universe which must be accurate to within 10 to the power of 10 to the power of 123 (if the real constant were only slightly above or slightly below this number: our Universe would not exist - including us)!!! Here is an axiom: The Sophistication Of An Object Cannot Exceed The Intelligence Of The Creator Of That Object!!!! There are no exceptions to this axiom!!! God is alive and well and WOW is He smart!!! Another giant reason evolution cannot be true is discussed below: Sixteen Cells Paradox. Cell divisions are not controlled by what you think they are controlled by!!! For one thing, DNA is not long enough by itself to control the complex cell divisions of any animal as I just mentioned!!!
The Beta-DNA Enzyme (A Cell Biology Issue)I inlcude this section not because it is relevant to this discussion, but because of two really cool images on a webpage. An enzyme is "a substance produced by a living organism which acts as a catalyst to bring about a specific biochemical reaction" (Google). "Enzymes can significantly speed up the rate of virtually all of the chemical reactions that take place within cells") (Google). Enzymes are one of those things that are absolutely needed in every cell.
Even the structure of the DNA for enzymes is an evidence of God's hands. See this image of the axis of the Beta-DNA or B-DNA enzyme DNA produced by Nobel Prize winner Dr. Francis Collins (this is not why he won his Nobel Prize) - Click Image to Magnify It: If you STUDY the right-hand image, you will know WHY, if the DNA of that enzyme is cut in half, like a rope, all of the scientists on this planet could not put the enzyme back together. Nor could accidents (i.e. evolution)!!!!!
If you want to have some fun, click on this link and try to read ALL of this online Abstract (I hope you have a sense of humor, I think it is funny): Did you realize that every once in awhile he or she used a word in the English language!!! There are people who actually understand that gibberish!!! If you had a PhD in cell biology you could easily understand that PubMed abstract. Now you know why so many people have PhD degrees in cell biology. Not only does God live, He is intelligent far beyond our imaginations. By the way, the author of that article lives in China. Click on the "Author information" link. I don't think reading that complete article in Chinese could possibly make it any harder to understand!!!
A FavorI already linked to a website which showed how many school districts were not favorable to evolution (they did not have a dot). But I need more information than that.
If you live in Utah and you are a high school student or a parent of a high school student, I would greatly appreciate it if you would email me this information: I will take this section down when I have enough information to see a pattern. My email address is at the bottom of this page. Thanks in advance!!!
|
|
Sperm Cells And OvaJust for terminology, an "ovum" is a single egg in a female animal. "Ova" is plural for ovum. An ovum is what gets fertilized (by a sperm cell) and this ovum divides and begins the massive number of cell divisions which create a baby of any animal species.
Let us dig deeper into the sperm cells and ova of humans in preparation for the next section: The female/mother has one or more ova (i.e. eggs) which are gender-neutral. It is the sperm cell (male sperm cell or female sperm cell) from the male, which gets to an ovum first, that will determine the sex of the baby!! There is literally a swimming race of sperm cells to get to an ovum first!!! The first one there wins and fertilizes the ovum. Ten million animal species had (if they are extinct) or have sperm cells that can swim!!!! So not only does "evolution" have to create and sequence DNA and create cells, it also must be able to create cells (sperm cells) which can swim and win a swimming race!!! I will not get into the subject of identical twins.
The Four New DNA Strands Which Are Needed To Create Any New Animal Species From Scratch Or From An Existing SpeciesWhile it takes three kinds of DNA strands to maintain an existing species, it takes four new DNA strands to create a new species from an old species (though two of these can be the same kind) or to create a new species from scratch!!! Let's dig into this issue when a new species is being created from an existing species. Let us assume that humans evolved from bonobos. Here are the four bonobo DNA strands I am talking about which must evolve into four new and improved human DNA strands so that the human race can begin (the minimum two new human male sperm cells and the minimum two new human female ova must be completed in the same generation, latitude and longitude so the bonobo mother (or mothers) can give birth to two human children (a male and a female) who can grow up and have their own human children to start the human race!!! 1) Millions of mindless changes to a DNA strand in at least one bonobo male sperm cell in a male bonobo to create a human male sperm cell, 2) Millions of mindless changes to a DNA strand in at least one bonobo female sperm cell in a male bonobo to create a human female sperm cell, 3) Millions of mindless changes to a DNA strand in a gender-neutral ovum in a female bonobo to become DNA in a human ovum (for the first human male sperm cell to fertilize) to create a new human male baby, 4) Millions of mindless changes to a second DNA strand in a second gender-neutral ovum in a female bonobo to become DNA in a second human ovum (for the second human male sperm cell to fertilize) to create a new human female baby. How many male bonobos and how many female bonobos are involved is not important. What is important is that a male and female human baby are born to one or two bonobo mothers (items #3 and #4). And after the millions of mindless changes (in each of these four cases) to start the human race (two from male bonobo DNA and two from female bonobo DNA) the four new human DNA strands must align with each other at the function level!!! Also note that bonobos, like all mammals, would have many sperm cells involved in the swimming race to the ovum, most of which are bonobo sperm cells which have not been modified by evolution!!! So the two new human sperm cells must win the swimming race!!! This is just another gigantic bump in the road for the theory of evolution. There are also latitude, longitude and timeframe issues as I already mentioned. For example, if the first male human DNA strand was created by evolution one-thousand years before the first female human DNA strand was created by evolution and/or the two bonobo mothers lived 5,000 miles apart, you would not be reading this sentence (because you would not exist) if evolution were true!!! Plus, the bonobo parents (of the first human male and human female babies) must not kill or abandon their human babies because human babies are really funny-looking to bonobos (i.e. they do not look like their wonderful, beautiful bonobo children)!!! How would you like to marry a bonobo??? Well, no bonobo would want to be married to you or me!!! And the four new human DNA strands must align with each other at the function level before any human children can be born!!! And the new human couple, or their descendants, must eventually start having more than two human children so that the new human race can begin to grow in numbers!!! Now you know some of the major reasons why the theory of evolution is complete scientific nonsense!!! The probability that millions of mindless, random, accidental changes to each of four bonobo DNA strands could occur and that these random changes would create four vastly superior human DNA strands for the human race, and these many millions of changes must realistically be spread out over many generations is both physically and mathematically and common sense absurd!!! And don't forget how many times we have talked about the fact that DNA cannot be changed while it is inside of a cell!! And don't forget that all four new human DNA strands must align with each other at the function level!! Yet the "evolution" of the DNA of the bonobo sperm cells and ova into human sperm cells and ova is precisely the foundation of the theory of evolution after the discovery of DNA in 1953!!! And there have been ten million animal species which currently live on this planet or have lived on this planet, all of which would need four new DNA strands (created from scratch or from another species)!!! That is forty-million new and highly sophisticated DNA strands created by the mindless accidents of evolution without any significant evidence of failures in this process!!! By the way, only one million of these ten million species still exist. But that is not a defective DNA issue it is an issue of many species dying off (e.g. due to an inadequate food supply or being killed off by other species). If evolution were true, the Cambrian Explosion cannot be explained because evolution cannot create a new species with four new DNA strands which must align with each other (at the function level of course), much less create many new species in a short amount of time (which is the characteristic feature of the Cambrian Explosion, meaning the word "explosion" means: many new species were created in a relatively short amount of time)!!! And if the theory of evolution were true, a really good genealogist could trace our ancestry (species to species) back to the "first living cell". Well, they are probably busy enough that they don't need that assignment. In addition, monkeys don't keep very good genealogy records. We can summarize the theory of evolution debate thusly: how can four DNA strands of one species be both physically and intelligently changed into four new and improved DNA strands for a new and improved species BY SOMETHING THAT DOESN'T EVEN EXIST (I.E. "EVOLUTION")???!!! And quite frankly, accidents aren't much smarter than Superman, but at least accidents can do tangible things!! Well, as far as sequencing DNA is concerned, humans aren't much smarter than Superman or accidents.
Moving A Segment Of DNA To Another Location on the DNA Strand (i.e. Cut And Join)This section is somewhat mentioned in the "Changing The Length Of A DNA Strand By Evolution/Accidents Is Impossible," but this section expands on the issues in that article. Let us look at one of the issues that is deadly to the theory of evolution!!! The entire foundation of the theory of evolution is that one species can "evolve" into a new and improved species. But with the discovery of DNA the new claim of the evolutionists must be that four DNA strands of an existing species can randomly be changed into four new and improved DNA strands for a new and improved species!! These random, mindless changes to DNA are sometimes called "copy errors" but of course DNA damage does not have to occur during copying a DNA strand, "evolution" assumes they can occur at any time even though cells take very good care of their DNA. So let us talk about random changes to a DNA strand!!! For example, in order to change the DNA of one species (bonobo DNA) into the DNA of a new and improved species (human DNA), millions of segments of DNA (on the bonobo DNA) would need to be moved, deleted and created from scratch on each of the four bonobo DNA strands needed to create four new and improved human DNA strands!!!
As an example, let's look at a single "move" of a section/segment of DNA (on the bonobo DNA) to a specific location on the new human DNA strand (i.e. as part of changing bonobo DNA into human DNA): Now note at this point that the segment being put on the human DNA strand, when joined, must "point in the right direction." In other words, suppose a segment ACGGTCC was moved from bonobo DNA to new human DNA. But let us suppose as it was floating around in the cell that it was accidently put in backwords so that the new area where the segment was placed on the new human DNA strand had the segment CCTGGCA. That would cause a problem. And if many segments were "moved" there would be many cases where the segment went in backwards. This is another problem for "evolution." THIS IS DEADLY TO THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION: mathematically half of all bonobo DNA segments (new or existing) would be put in backwards in creating human DNA!!!! Another issue is that when a bonobo DNA segment is cut out (and if it is needed by the human DNA strand) it would just be floating around in the cell and how would it find the correct slot it should be put in????? Actually, at the peak of this process more than a million segments of DNA (most of them from the bonobo DNA strand but some of them would be new segments for the human DNA) would be floating around in the cell at the same time (it would take far too long to do this one segment at a time). How would the right segment find the right "slot" and point it in the right direction??? And how did the new segments of DNA, which were not from the bonobo DNA strand, get created inside of a bonobo cell which does not have that sequence in a segment??? This also means that at the peak of this process that the original DNA strand would be floating around in millions of different pieces along with the millions of brand new segments of DNA needed to create the new human species!!!!! Where do the segments not needed by the human DNA stands go??? The only place they can go is in the cell. And these segments would interfere with getting the correct segments in the correct location. Here is another issue. In order to convert bonobo DNA into human DNA, let us assume that human DNA is longer than bonobo DNA. Whether it is or not, there are many cases where a shorter DNA strand (for one species) would have to "evolve" into a longer DNA strand for the new species. Here is a giant question: where do the new segments (which are not from bonobo DNA) come from??? The cells in bonobos do not have any extra nucleotide segments floating around waiting to create a new species with a longer DNA strand!!! But even if such a segment is found (which it won't), something must know where the segment needs to go and which direction the sequence needs to be put in and something must cut the DNA strand at that location and then something must connect the DNA segment in two places to the new DNA strand!!! In any case, millions of changes to bonobo DNA (to each of four bonobo DNA strands) would be necessary to create human DNA. All of this is proof that the theory of evolution is total nonsense after the discovery of DNA because, in many cases, evolution would require millions of changes to four old DNA strands to create four new and improved DNA strands for a new and improved species!!!
Be sure to read this article (if you haven't already read it) as to why a segment of DNA cannot be changed while the DNA strand is inside of a cell:
|
|
The Physical ConstantsThis is talked about in the Physics article, but it is so important I will repeat this specific issue here. This section will talk about the physical constants in our Universe. The probabilities that the pure accidents of the theory of evolution could have created the physical constants in our Universe, are so bad that sometimes the atheists and evolutionists (who realize this is a major problem for the theory of evolution) claim there have been an infinite number of Universes (each with a random set of physical constants hoping this random set of physical constants will create a Universe) and our Universe just happened to have the right set of physical constants in physics!! There probably are an infinite number of Universes, but rest assured that if there are, every one of them was created by God (or by someone He delegated the authority and power) and every one of them has the correct set of physical constants and every Universe has life on many of its planets!!! Do you really think that Superman or the "flying spaghetti monster" flew around the Universe and created the physical constants in physics??? Without physical constants (well, without the force that creates the physical constants, some of which almost certainly exist because of Tesla's aether), there would not be a Universe for us to live on!!! "Aether" can also be spelled "ether," though the term "ether" has multiple definitions. By the way, "physicists," as they call themselves, hate Tesla!!! For some reason they think that Einstein was smarter than Tesla. NOPE!!! If the word "Einstein" is attached to a theory everyone assumes it is correct, and it may be correct, but they never look for causality!!! In fact, one of Einstein's major theories would not exist without aether as the causality of the phenomenon!!! Here is a modified quote from one of my other websites: "[Einstein's] Special Theory of Relativity is true BECAUSE of the ether. If one object is traveling faster than another object, relative to the ether, then it will incur more resistance than the other object (relative to the aether because of the aether) and thus the observer will experience slower "time." In fact, the Special Theory of Relativity is nonsense without the aether"!!! In other words, if aether did not exist Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity would not exist because there would be no causality!!!!!! Sorry, the word "Einstein" DOES NOT CREATE CAUSALITY!!!!! But aether does!!!! The electrical grid, which is where the electricity for your house comes from, was an invention of Tesla!!! You would not be reading the screen on your computer right now if it were not for Tesla!!
In any case, slowly page all the way down to the very bottom of the article on the M.I.T. (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) website:
When you have memorized that article (joke), here is an amazing, amazing, amazing YouTube video which does not mention anywhere near as many items as the M.I.T. document, but it is REQUIRED WATCHING because it demonstrates, in six minutes, the amazing accuracy of some of the physical constants:
This is my www.TeslaPhysics.com website which talks about Tesla and aether (it can be spelled: ether or aether). There is a free eBook on that website which I wrote about the detection of aether, when I worked at Sprint many years ago: Yes, God is alive and well even in space!!!
Here is another evidence of the greatness of God. I quote from another website regarding the Hubble Space Telescope: "The Hubble telescope focused on that tiny, dark spot in space. The film was exposed for many hours over ten days but astronomers did not expect to find anything. Instead, when the film developed they were amazed to find over 1,500 galaxies and each galaxy contains about two hundred billion stars." My article on "outer darkness" is also about amazing facts in astronomy, especially the Kuiper Belt and Oort Cloud. One of the things said by the Savior would make no sense without the Kuiper Belt and Oort Cloud!!! There is an article on "outer darkness" which is linked to below.
More On Cell Biology And Microbiology"Cell Biology" is essentially the study of the cells that exist in animals and plants. "Microbiology" is the study of single-celled organisms (i.e. microorganisms, well they are not always single cells). Every cell is vastly more sophisticated than anything ever made by humans as I have already mentioned!!! In Darwin's day it was possible to believe in the theory of evolution because scientists in his day knew nothing about DNA (DNA was discovered in 1953) and they knew nothing about the physical constants and while they knew what a cell was they had absolutely no clue how sophisticated cells were!!! But today, with what is known about DNA, cells, the physical constants, etc. the theory of evolution is complete and absolute nonsense!! Remember the quote I mentioned above about the complexity of cells. Michael Denton did not say there was one such sequence of chemical chain reactions in cells, but "tens of thousands" of such sequences!!! You should see the size of my cell biology books!!! One of my Cell Biology books (Essential Cell Biology, third edition) has 9 authors and has a glossary with more than 900 terms!!! This should give you an idea as to why cell biologists need a massive memory!!! Here is the title of a section in Chapter 18: Unattached Chromosomes Block Sister-Chromatid Separation. How would you like to take a test on that subject??!! I wish I was smart enough to understand that book. This book is for third-year Cell Biology students!!! So is The World Of The Cell book. I have a granddaughter in college who is studying Microbiology. She must have gotten her memory from my wife.
Here is a 13 minute YouTube video which deals with the probability of creating a single protein by pure chance:
Here is a 10 minute YouTube video which talks about the same subject!!! This is an even more amazing YouTube Video:
Here is an entire article on Cell Biology (you could call it an introduction to an introduction [60 more times] to Cell Biology and Microbiology). The good news is that it links to some really cool YouTube videos:
This is a string which you can copy and paste into Google that is another resource for information about cell biology, but in this case I think most or all of it is free: You should get more than 200,000 hits!!! Many of these articles include YouTube videos!!! There are many millions of different types of cells (considering all types of animals, insects, plants, etc.) which have existed or currently exist, none of which could have been created by the mindless accidents of evolution!!! Someday I hope to find a Cell Biologist or Microbiologist who will write a few articles on why cell biology (or even microbiology) is a proof that the theory of evolution is false. These people are smart!!! You would know that if you ever tried to read a graduate school textbook on cell biology or microbiology!!!! The problem is that no one would understand their articles!!! These scientists are not capable of speaking English!!! More on cell biology from time to time.
Latter-Day Saint (LDS) Section - Meaning Mormon Section (Which Anyone Is Welcome To Read)What started out as a large section of links to Latter-Day Saint articles (e.g. Mormon articles or officially: The Church Of Jesus Christ Of Latter-Day Saints) on this home page has now turned into two articles to keep this home page from getting way too long. Well, it is already way too long. The first article has some links to general conference talks, etc. etc. This article is required reading for Latter-Day Saints but even for non-Mormons there is a lot of information relative to the Bible!!
Here are just three of the many links to other articles which are mentioned in this article:
These are the key scriptures mentioned in The First Book article:
Here is the article, LDS Section:
The LDS Scholar article is somewhat similar but it does have some additional comments. It also has a test question for LDS scholars and every one of them will have the wrong answer to the test question (unless they have read this home page): When the LDS church talks about the worse punishment of all, the Son of Perdition punishment, the phrase "Outer Darkness" frequently comes up.
When the New Testament scriptures were originally written, during the time of Christ, "scientists" in the days of Christ only knew four things about the Universe: Yet the Savior, during His ministry, mentioned the term "Outer Darkness multiple times (all of them recorded in the book of Matthew in the Bible)!!! The Book of Mormon also describes the Son of Perdition punishment, but in a different way.
Today, with what astronomers have discovered, we have a very, very good idea of what He was talking about!!! Here is an artcle on the subject of "Outer Darkness" (I also talk about Planet 9 aka Planet X): So the LDS church describes "rewards" and "punishments" all the way from the highest degree of the Celestial Kingdom to the lowest degree in hell (the "Sons of Perdition"). By the way, most people think that the King Follett Discourse of the prophet Joseph Smith was the first time the "Sons of Perdition" category was discussed. Nope, it was mentioned in the Book of Alma in the Book of Mormon (but the word "perdition" was not used) when Alma the Younger was chewing out one of his sons. More on this in the First Book article below.
Non-Denominational, Free And Amazing Bible Videos By the Church Of Jesus Christ Of Latter-Day Saints!!!!!!!!!!There is a spectacular, incredibly well done set of short non-denominational YouTube videos on the life of Christ made by the LDS church (i.e. the "Mormon" church or officially "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints"), which are free and online!!! Watch a couple of them just so you see the quality!!! I LOVE THESE SHORT VIDEOS!!!
Anyone of any Christian religion will love them as they are totally non-denominational and purely, word for word, out of the King James Bible without any added comments. And the quality and authenticity are amazing:
As an example of one of the short video clips I just linked to, here is a very short sample video taken from the above page: "Calming the Tempest" (drag your cursor to the middle of the initial image and clink the arrow to start the video):
Measuring The Damage Caused By The Theory of Evolution Being Taught In SchoolsWhile the theory of evolution versus creation science debate is heated, the debate is far more than academic because many students are victims of this battle!! As a result of the teaching of evolution in many schools, countless middle school, high school and college students have lost their belief in God or they may question their belief in God. Remember, any school which teaches the theory of evolution is teaching the religion of atheism!!! In other words: these schools are TEACHING ATHEISM, not science!!! Fortunately, the damage done by evolution can be measured. Studies funded by the very well-known evangelical creationist Ken Ham organization have shown that most of the loss in a testimony of God occurs in middle school and high school, not in college!! Ken Ham's conclusion, based on statistics, is that many students are already gone by the time they get to college!! Remember those two words in red for a minute. In other words, many college strudents switched over to atheism/evolution even before they got to college!!! To put it another way, college students didn't lose their testimony in God in college because their testimony was already gone before they set foot in college!!!! Amen, brother!!! But of course, those young people who still have a testimony of God when they enter college will have that testimony challenged in college depending on what courses they take and what university they attend. An analysis of "hit" patterns (relative to "hits" for this website) from a billboard in Utah (Utah is mostly Mormon), that I paid for, also came to the same conclusions as the evangelicals - that most of the damage is in middle school and high school!!! Parents frequently need to get involved in explaining to their children why the theory of evolution cannot be true!!! And that is being done in many cases!!! So it is usually the parents who are reading this website before their children and they are showing this website to their children!! I should also note that the evangelicals do not have the Pearl of Great Price scriptures of the Mormon church. Many things in the early chapters of Genesis (written by Moses) were damaged (i.e. poor translations, lost documents, injected bias, etc.) over the many centuries between when the early chapters of Genesis were originally written by Moses and today. As one example, the early chapters in Genesis are frequently interpreted to mean that the entire Universe (or our Galaxy) was created in six literal days. This is nonsense. If our entire Universe or galaxy had been created in six literal days (six thousand years ago), then the light from any other galaxy (and light from most stars of our own galaxy) would not be anywhere near arriving at this planet yet (i.e. we wouldn't be able to see any other galaxies, and most of our own galaxy, no matter how big our telescopes in space were because the light hasn't reached us yet)!!!!! Our Universe is obviously very, very old. In fact, every time a newer and more powerful telescope is put into action (either on land or in space) more galaxies are discovered. Consider Moses 1:33-35 (God is speaking to Moses) and remember that the Pearl of Great Price was written anciently and it was translated and published many decades before the discovery of cells or DNA or other galaxies: 33 And worlds without number have I created; and I also created them for mine own purpose; and by the Son I created them, which is mine Only Begotten. 34 And the first man of all men have I called Adam, which is many. 35 But only an account of this earth, and the inhabitants thereof, give I unto you. For behold, there are many worlds that have passed away by the word of my power. And there are many that now stand, and innumerable are they unto man; but all things are numbered unto me, for they are mine and I know them. Note the phrase: and by the Son I created them. This may be why some high ranking leaders of the LDS church have felt that Christ is the person who executed the Big Bang. But I am not aware that the church has officially said who was responsible for the Big Bang. I should note that the Pearl of Great Price was published long before scientists knew we lived in a galaxy, much less that there were many other galaxies and even clusters of galaxies and superclusters of galaxies!!!
The Pearl of Great Price exists to fix a lot of the damage done to the Bible. But it has other things in it as well.
Here is a link to the first evangelical Ken Ham video: "Already Gone - Part 1" (22 minutes) about the damage to the youth in his evangelical religion caused by the teaching of evolution (they actually hired a company to do the research):
If you were not automatically taken to Part 2 - here is "Already Gone - Part 2" (20 minutes): In these two videos he has some brilliant evidence for Noah's Ark!!! He makes it clear that Noah's Ark was plenty big enough to save every species that God wanted to save. Well, I don't know if Noah would have had a male and female for the one million species which now exist. The flood may not have covered our entire planet, only the part of our planet that had wicked humans. Of course we don't know, but there is plenty of evidence the "flood" really happened!!! I sometimes wonder whether the flood was designed to kill-off some of the 9 million now-extinct species along with many very wicked humans. As we would say: "God killed two birds with one stone - the flood"!! The flood may have had some benefits that we should appreciate today (if many animals still existed which were destroyed by the flood or before the flood). I don't think that grade school children today would want to run into a hungry T-Rex while they were walking to school!!! Just a guess!!! The point is that the teaching of evolution and even secularism in public schools is having a significant effect on the beliefs in God and Christ even before the young people get to college (where the colleges can take over destroying what is left of their belief/testimony in God). As Ken Ham would say, these students are spiritually "Already Gone" by the time they get to college!!! The point is that when students are still at home, the parents need to know what is being taught in their local schools regarding evolution. I assume this would primarly be in science or biology classes. But colleges can also damage many testimonies about God.
Natural Selection (and "Evolution By Natural Selection")"Natural selection" is the claim that stronger species survive and weaker species may not survive. Natural selection is perfectly true. However, "natural selection" is frequently used as "evidence" for the theory of evolution. However, I should note that "natural selection" has never created a new species!!! And natural selection never makes a species stronger!! By definition, natural selection can only eliminate weak species WHICH ALREADY EXIST which are killed via environment, starvation or they are killed by other species. Let me repeat that: By definition, natural selection can only eliminate weak species WHICH ALREADY EXIST which are killed via environment, starvation or they are killed by other species. Natural Selection doesn't create any new DNA or any new cells or any new species!!! As far as one species killing-off another species is concerned, natural selection is only effective when two or more species already exist!!! But in all cases, natural selection is purely an elimination process that eliminates weak species!! Natural selection is not a creation process!!! In other words, natural selection reduces the number of species on a planet, it never increases the number of species on a planet!!! Let me say part of that last section again: natural selection reduces the number of species on a planet!!! Remember, there are nine million extinct animal species which have lived on this planet. Some may have gone extinct because of weather changes, others may have gone extinct because some other species killed them off or because their food supply was cut-off or because Noah did not put them on the ark (if T-Rexes existed when the ark was being built, I am glad Noah did not put a pair of T-Rex on the ark and I am sure he was glad too!!!)!!! Natural selection is NOT evidence for evolution because it is only an elimination process after multiple species already exist!!! You may hear the phrase: "evolution by natural selection." I just did a Google search on that phrase and got 819,00 hits!!! How can that many people be so easily deceived!!! Well, because they hear it from others and then they repeat it because it sounds cool. It is what they want to hear!!! Natural Selection is perfectly true, but it is purely an elimination process!!! The phrase "evolution by natural selection" is nothing but an oxymoron after the discovery of DNA!! Remember, the only thing that natural selection can do is eliminate weak species!!! The claim that natural selection is "evidence" for evolution is paradoxical!! NATURAL SELECTION WORKS AGAINST EVOLUTION. Evolution is "trying" to create new and improved species (which it has never done) and natural selection is trying to eliminate existing species (which it does all the time)!!! Let me repeat that: NATURAL SELECTION WORKS AGAINST EVOLUTION. Evolution is "trying" to create new and improved species (which it has never done) and natural selection is trying to eliminate existing species (which it does all the time)!!! Natural selection will easily win that battle because natural selection does not have to deal with the statistics of creating and sequencing new DNA and new cells. A problem with natural selection is that because DNA cannot be created and sequenced by evolution, there should be no species of animals on this planet so natural selection should have nothing to do because there should not be any species to "select" from!! But given that God has created a million species of animals currently on this planet, natural selection is a perfectly valid scientific concept!!! God had to exist (to create the species) long before natural selection could exist!!!! Remember, while natural selection is a valid concept, IT IS ONLY AN ELIMINATION PROCESS. Some people might claim that natural selection increases the overall quality of species on this planet by eliminating the weak species. That is true, but do not infer from this that natural selection can create a single new species!!!
This article will go into great detail about why Natural Selection has absolutely nothing to do with evolution:
Important Notes Before Going On To The Next Major Section Of This Home PageYou are more than half way done with the home page but there are a few things I need to mention. Note #1: When I realize that I have made a mistake (e.g. for a long time I thought that DNA is what solely controlled cell divisions) it can take a year or more before I get around to updating and fixing all of the articles that have this mistake!!! So you will still be seeing articles or chapters of books on this website which mention that DNA controls cell divisions for many months to come!!! Note #2: Don't forget: please, please, please tell your friends about this website, such as via social media or email or by putting a link to this website on your website. There is no other website on the Internet even close to this website on the subject of why the theory of evolution cannot be true!!! I know how many hits I get every day and I can tell by the "hit patterns" that a couple of times someone on social media has spread the word!!! Wonderful - Thanks!!! Note #3: The original purpose of this website was to host a free eBook. Well, now there are four free eBooks on this website plus many articles on evolution and some links to articles for Latter-Day Saints (which of course anyone is welcome to read) and for cancer patients (or those who want to prevent ever getting cancer).
Here again is a link to these books and articles when you get around to them: The Quick Links article just mentioned also includes a link to an article which lists more than 400 reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true. It is an old article but I suspect the vast majority of it still contains accurate reasons why evolution cannot be true. But it is not up-to-date with the all of the best reasons evolution cannot be true. Let the next section of this home page begin.
|
|
More On The Sophistication Of Human DNA (And The Spirit)A human DNA strand is seven feet long, but it is coiled up to fit inside of a cell that cannot be seen with the naked eye!!! This DNA strand is combined with, and used by, the spirit of the new baby. The new baby is made of roughly 37.2 trillion cells which includes 60,000 miles of blood vessels, etc. I do not know if spirits have blood vessels, but maybe they do?? Or maybe that is one of those DNA things the spirit doesn't deal with. The 60,000 miles of blood vessels in this newborn baby would wrap around the earth at the equator twice, with 10,000 miles of blood vessels left over!! At four weeks after conception, the new baby is growing at one million cells a second!!! But if the blood vessels of this new baby were not fullly enclosed, before blood starts to flow, the fetus would bleed to death!!! So timing is EVERYTHING!!!! Ponder these things for a moment, we are talking about a human baby!!! When the baby is born he or she will have an incredible brain which is connected to a massive nervous system, a skull to protect the brain, a spine to protect the spinal cord (which is a cylindrical bundle of nerve fibers), two eyes which are connected to the nervous system which can see in 3-D, a beating heart, a liver, a pancreas, 300 bones (which eventually fuse into 206 bones), etc. etc.!! The DNA in a sperm cell of the father of the baby contributes part of the DNA for the new baby and the DNA in the mother's ovum (egg) contributes part of the DNA for the new baby. The DNA strands include databases from the mother's DNA and father's DNA which must align with each other at the function level and are accessed by the spirit of the new baby!!! But it is even more complicated than that. Men actually have two types of DNA strands: the DNA in the "male sperm cells" which will lead to a male baby and the DNA in the "female sperm cells" which will lead to a female baby. The DNA in the mother's egg/ovum is gender-neutral. So if a male sperm cell penetrates the mother's egg first (along with its DNA), a male baby will result. If a female sperm cell penetrates the mother's egg first (along with its DNA), a female baby will result. The sex of the baby is literally a swimming race of sperm cells to penetrate an ovum first!! You will have to sit down and ponder the rest of this paragraph - it is mind-numbing: so a male sperm cell can create a male baby who eventually has an adult male body which can create its own male sperm cells!!! Are you serious??!! A male sperm cell can lead to the creation of a male body which can itself create male sperm cells!!! Something is wrong with this picture??? I would like the atheists and evolutionists to explain that!!! Have I mentioned that God is smart???
Comparing The Creation Of DNA (Supposedly Created By Evolution) To The Creation of Computer Programs (Created By Humans)The process of writing real computer programs can teach us a lot about the process of evolution which has supposedly written highly sophisticated DNA (none of which are understood by humans) forty million of times (to create ten million new animal species) without any brains or known errors in the DNA of any of the ten million animal species!!!
If computer programmers wrote computer programs the way that evolution must sequence DNA strands (using nothing but mindless accidents), there would not be a single, functional computer program on this planet!!! Here is an article on that subject:
Here is another article about comparing writing computer programs to the creation of DNA:
Here is a companion article which asks: why do we need computer programmers?: But of course evolution (if it were real) would have the added burden (which computer programmers do not have) of aligning the DNA of four DNA databases (i.e. four DNA strands), at the function level when creating a new species from an old species. The father's two new DNA strands (when creating a new species) and the mothers two new DNA strands (ditto) must align with each other at the function level and these four DNA strands must be exactly the same length in each section (and subsection) even though each baby gets part of its DNA from its mother and part of its DNA from its father!!! I would like to see four teams of computer programmers who are given the same assignment to independently (the members of each team are not allowed to communicate or collaborate with anyone in any of the other teams in order to simulate the stupidity of evolution) write four massively complex computer programs with exactly the same objectives. In other words, each team of computer programmers must write a computer program to achieve the goals set by the referee. Each computer program, written by a different team (the members of a team of course are not allowed to talk to members of other teams to simulate evolution), must create a binary string (i.e. a complied computer program)!!! When done the four binary strings of the four computer programs, written independently by four different teams of computer programmers who do not compare notes between teams, must align with each other (at the function level) meaning all four of the binary programs must be exactly the same length for each functional section (e.g. subroutine) and overall!!! Obviously the four computer program object codes would not align in the slightest!!! That is only half of the issues. Then each team should write these four new computer programs (object code or language code) by using nothing but four different random number generators (to simulate the total randomness of "evolution")!!! None of these "programs" would have any function!!! Nor would any DNA strand squenced by the brainless evolution!!! While DNA is primarily a database that does not make the problems for evolution any easier. Random is random. Let us dig deeper. Suppose evolution/accidents tried to create four new male and female human DNA strands from four male and female bonobo DNA strands. Remember, evolution requires four new and improved DNA strands to create a new species, in this case humans. Suppose the DNA strand created by evolution for the first human male sperm cell was fine (which is impossible). But suppose the DNA created by evolution for the second human male sperm cell had only 95% of the length of the DNA for the first human male sperm cell!! And what if the first female DNA strand for the first human female ovum was only 90% as long as the DNA for the first human male sperm cell!! And what if the second female DNA strand for the second human female ovum was only 85% as long as the DNA for the first human male sperm cell!!
We wouldn't be here if evolution were true!!! As we have already done, let us define a "field" to be a very specific segment of DNA which creates a very specific enzyme or has some other very specific function needed by the cell. A human DNA strand would require many more "fields" than a bonobo DNA strand would need, such as in the creation of the human brain. This means that in the conversion of bonobo DNA into human DNA there would be many more "fields" of DNA segments (not just individual nucleotides). Each "field" must be the same length, and in the same location/sequence, on all four new human DNA strands!!! The probability that four randomly created human DNA strands (randomly created by the pure accidents of evolution by modifying bonobo DNA), after millions of changes to their original bonobo DNA (to create the human species), would be the same length as each other and that all four DNA strands would align at the function and field levels is total nonsense!! This certainly would not be the case when the human brain was created from a bonobo brain because humans would have far more "fields" in their brain DNA than bonobos. My point is that the four human DNA strands created by evolution WOULD PROBABLY NOT EVEN HAVE THE SAME LENGTH AS EACH OTHER!!! In other words, if four bonobo DNA strands "evolved" into four human DNA strands, the "fields" would not be the same "fields" and the "fields" would not be in the same location or in the same order or be pointed in the same direction or be the same length (because everything was done randomly)!!! And keep asking yourself: where are the failures of evolution???
Humans And Chimpanzees - A Common Ancestor???
You have to admire the creativity of the atheists and evolutionists in their attempts to get new converts. They never give up!!! Let me quote from another website obviously written by an evolutionist (the coloring is mine):
I am not exactly what sure he/she means by the phrase: "we share about 99% of our DNA". Obviously 99% of bonobo DNA and 99% of human DNA are not the same sequence of nucleotides!! I doubt that my DNA and the DNA of my oldest son John are 99% similar!! I cannot figure out what the authors mean.
Here is a quote from another website: "Despite the similarities in human and chimp genomes, the scientists identified some 40 million differences among the three billion DNA molecules, or nucleotides, in each genome." This also doesn't make any sense. If anyone concludes that chimpanzees have 96% of the intelligence of humans, they have been sniffing something!!! Because scientists have no clue what DNA is used for, how in the world can they come to these conclusions!!! It is clearly a play on words. However, because DNA is primarily a database there may be more similarities than a person would expect than if DNA was a computer program to control the cell divisions. So perhaps what these scientists discovered, without knowing it, is that DNA is a primarily a database!!! The concept of "common ancestor" is totally based on the assumption that evolution is true and that DNA can be changed!!! Well, our DNA does have something in common with chimpanzee DNA!!! Listen to this carefully: we have a common designer - God!!! Computer programmers reuse subroutines all the time in source code!!! When God designed the DNA for humans and chimpanzees He may have used some sections of DNA more than once. God is efficient. I don't know whether He designed human DNA first or chimpanzee DNA first. This method is common, for example, with those who design automobiles as they would occasionally use common parts from an old model car in the new model car. This saves money for the automobile manufacturer. Or there could be other reasons that God (or some of His children He assigned the task before Adam and Eve were put on this planet - we were spirits back then) used "common parts" on DNA. The point is that the fact that DNA cannot be changed (to create a new species from an old species) is VERY IMPORTANT when thinking about the claims of the atheists and evolutionists. This is just an example of how the atheists and evolutionists assume evolution is true as part of their "evidence" that evolution is true!!! To put it another way, anyone can prove anything if their clever terminology (e.g. "common ancestor") bypasses the massive scientific problems with their claims (e.g. that evolution is true). It amounts to "proof by using clever terminology and making massive assumptions" - such as by claiming that humans and chimpanzees have a common ancestor!! Let me repeat that in a different way: the atheists and evolutionists assume that the theory of evolution is true as part of their evidence that the theory of evolution is true!!! The fact that there is a massive difference in intelligence between human intelligence and bonobo intelligence, yet if our DNA differences are not that great (which I very seriously question), is a massive proof that humans and bonobos have spirits and that the difference in our intelligence is mostly, if not entirely, because of our spirits, not our DNA-based databases!!! In addition, DNA is "irreducibly complex," meaning every section and sequence has to work the first time!!! Evolution cannot rewrite a section of DNA that was not quite right the first time and then insert it back into the DNA where it belongs (after cutting out the bad section)!!! Especially for four DNA strands!!! This is important: try telling a group of computer programmers that they are not allowed to change the source code of a massively sophisticated computer program after the first draft is written!!! They would not be happy at all!!! But God gets it right the first time!!! That is why you don't see any evidence of dead, mutated species whose DNA was not quite right the first time!!! Where are the errors of evolution??? If evolution were true there would be massively, massively more dead and mutated animals (which never even became alive) than there are atoms in this Universe!!!
Go to the Permutations article and again study the section: Advanced Permutation Issues: I love this paragraph from that article:
That is a statistical fact due to the rarity of viable permutations!!! Thinking about evolution - A DNA strand has no way to tell whether its sequence is "correct" or not, nor does it care - DNA itself is as dumb as a rock and would have no motivation for survival because it has no goals. But even if one animal feels inferior to another animal (in terms of survival skills) the inferior animal cannot change its own DNA so that it's offspring are smarter and stronger in future generations (assuming DNA controlled cell divisions, which it does not)!!! An animal doesn't know that its DNA is part of the reasons why it is inferior to another species!!! Nor could it fix its own DNA even if it knew that DNA was the problem!!! Well, of course the spirit of an animal is why an animal is inferior to another animal. The atheists and evolutionists seem to claim that by "thinking we need something" (such as a better brain or stronger muscles) our DNA will be changed so that our children will be smarter and stronger than we are. NOPE!!!! Mathematics doesn't work that way.
A Little More About CellsI wasn't kidding when I said that a team of cell biologists could create a website several times larger than this website just talking about cells!!! Thousands of scientists have PhD degrees in "Cell Biology" or Microbiology!! Cells are not simple!! So how could a person with a PhD in Cell Biology or Microbiology think for one instant that cells, and what goes on inside of cells, were created purely by accidents???!!! Well, if they are arrogant enough to believe there is no God they have no other choice!!! Pride is a massive, massive, massive element in the evolution debate!!! Many scientists are so proud that they refuse to believe that a God could exist who is smarter than they are!!!
Here is an article about the sophistication of cells - very interesting stuff (this has some YouTube videos): I am not sure what his complaint about the Big Bang is so I have no comment on that. The Big Bang obviously did happen. Maybe he was saying it was not an accident. I agree with that. Or perhaps he didn't know about the discovery of Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation.
Here is the bottom line: the scientific evidence is overwhelming that accidents have not created a single cell or a single DNA strand or a single galaxy or Universe!! Nor have accidents intelligently sequenced the nucleotides on any DNA strand!! The entire foundation of the theory of evolution is scientific nonsense!! Here is my article on Cell Biology and Microbiology, which I linked to above: Trust me: God is alive and well and He is a heck of a lot smarter than any of us!! And because we are His children (e.g. our spirits may be assigned to Him if spirits cannot be created) we have a lot more potential than we can conceive now!!! God loves most of His children (well, I doubt He loves the potential sons of perdition or the potential "like unto the son of perdition" people unless they repent in time)!!!
|
|
The Magnitude Of The Problems With The Theory Of EvolutionThe biggest problem I have with maintaining this website is keeping track of all of the reasons that evolution cannot be true!!! It is literally humanly impossible to constantly be changing articles every time I come up with another reason evolution cannot be true (or I find more reasons in an old article or old notebook that I have not looked at in years). The above items are just a few of the hundreds of scientific reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true which are discussed on this website. But I should emphasize that the MAGNITUDE of the reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true is simply beyond comprehension. The permutation issues of the DNA for several million species, all of which have or had (if they are extinct) both males and females, alone would eliminate any chance that the theory of evolution is true. That is forty-million DNA strands (four for each animal species which has existed or currently exists) to create the ten million animal species which do exist or have existed!!! And this is just for animals!!! And the construction of millions of different kinds of animal cells (considering all animal species) which must be in exact locations on the body (during the morphing of the embryo) or plant cells or insect cells, etc. are more massive reasons evolution cannot be true!!! Each animal, plant and insect species probably has many unique types of cells which apply only to that species!!! And each of these types of cells must be in exactly the correct location starting with a single seed or a single fertilized egg!!! And where are the failures of the brainless evolution??? Even experienced computer programmers, with very good brains, almost always have to write several drafts of a new computer program being written from scratch!!! The longer and more complex a computer program is the more drafts will be needed!!! But there is no evidence that God needed any extra drafts to create the DNA and cells for a single animal species!!! In other words, there is zero evidence of failures in DNA sequences or in creating cells or in the process of putting all of the animals, plants and insects on this planet together via cell divisions!!! Do not look at each reason the theory of evolution cannot be true as being equal with the other reasons. Some reasons are massive enough, by themselves to make the theory of evolution completely ludicrous!!! Now I want to make it very clear that many students have been fooled by the atheists and evolutionists. This is nothing to be ashamed of!!! The atheists and evolutionists have perfected the art of deception, they are well-organized, very well-funded and their deceptions are highly polished!!! Atheists don't want a God to exist because a God would be massively smarter than they are. So most of them do everything in their vivid imaginations to pretend there is no God and to claim that everything in the Universe came to exist by pure chance. God is replaced by mindless accidents!!! Here is something to think about: if God had our intelligence, we would not exist!!! Of course, many teachers are required to teach the theory of evolution even though they may not believe in the theory of evolution. This is because judges do not need to pass a test in Cell Biology before they get sworn in!!! Maybe it should be required in the future!!! Maybe a person should not be allowed to be a judge (at all levels of judges, including the U.S. Supreme Court) unless they can pass the same test a graduate school student in Cell Biology must pass in their final exams. Oh yea, they also must explain how bonobo DNA and cell types and cell locations became human DNA and cell types and cell locations!!! That would fix a lot of problems with the Republican/Democrat debates. But this plan may not work because if a person had all of this information they would likely become very proud and pride is precisely what creates atheists meaning pride overrules a knowledge of obvious scientific facts!!! My point is that the atheists win in the schools because of incredibly stupid judges!!!! I guarantee that teaching atheism in school was not the intention of the founding fathers of America!!!! By the way, the constitution was written in 1787, long before Darwin's first book came out.
Here is an article which will grow in numbers (e.g. numbers of reasons evolution cannot be true) as I get time to go through the many notebooks (and old versions of the home page) where I have written down many ideas about why the theory of evolution cannot be true:
Here is the article with more than 400 reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true which is also linked to in the Quick Links article:
What A Student Should Not Do!!So what should a student do when they realize the theory of evolution is complete scientific nonsense?? It is definitely not advisable for a student to argue with their teacher, but there is nothing wrong with a student quietly going "online" and learning the truth about the absurdity of the theory of evolution because of the sophistication of DNA and the sophistication of the cells that the DNA resides inside of, among many other reasons (e.g. the physical constants and the creation of this Universe). Just quietly, and low key, spread the word among your friends. Definitely mention this website if a teacher gets involved!!! Have your teacher email me if they have any questions or comments (my email address is at the bottom of this home page). I will be happy to answer his or her questions and I would appreciate their comments if they think I say something wrong. I am human after all so I might be wrong on some issues. In fact, I have made changes to this website based on user comments. Well, I don't look at my emails every day so it may take some time for me to read any email.
Evolution From The "First Living Cell" To Human DNA (A Major, Major Section!!!)If you were going to build an ocean liner you might start with building a single bolt. Well, if evolution were true, the first thing evolution would have created would not have been a Woolley Mammoth, it would have been a single cell, which is defined to be the "first living cell." Ditto for humans: humans were not the first living thing on this planet!!! For one thing, humans would have had nothing to eat if we were created first by God or evolution. The "Garden of Eden" existed before Adam and Eve existed. There is a reason the garden was made first!!! Plants love dirt. Humans cannot live on dirt. If evolution were true, life would have had to start with a very simple, single cell; which is called the "first living cell." As one creation scientist asked: "how does water, salt, dirt, etc. turn into a living cell"??? In fact, all of the scientists on this planet could not create a single living cell using nothing but water, salt, dirt, etc.!!!! Well, they cannot create a living cell using anything they want to use!!!
This article talks about the credibility of the "first living cell" theory as claimed by the atheists and evolutionists: Evolutionists claim that the DNA of the first human male and the DNA of the first human female "evolved" independently over millions of years, from the same "first living cell"!!! And everything had to happen by a series of accidents called "evolution"!!! But to do this each new male and new female of a new species had to "evolve" in the same latitude, longitude and timeframe (so the species could have had offspring)!!! This just adds to the headaches of evolution!!! We now know that human DNA is 3,200,000,000 nucleotides long. Let us assume that the length of the "first living cell" was 10,000 nucleotides long. At an average increase in length of 15,000 nucleotides scattered throughout the DNA strand for each new species, there would have been 213,333 species between the "first living cell" and human DNA!!! And once the first "animal" was created by evolution, each "new" animal species would have needed four new and improved DNA strands and many different and/or new cell types!!! And at some point, starting with the first animal species which had both a male and female, male DNA and female DNA had to "evolve" independently from there on. In other words, for each new species four new and improved DNA strands would need to align with each other at the function level - independent of each other - for each new species!!!
Why The Estimated Nine-Million Extinct Animal Species Would Be Far Too Small If Evolution Were TrueThis next few paragraphs are very, very, very, very important because it means that the estimated number of unique DNA strands, and the estimated number of unique types of cells is far, far, far greater than what would normally be predicted!!!!!!!!! That is the last thing the atheists and evolutionists want to hear because it means that "evolution" would have had to create far more unique DNA strands and far more unique cell types than currently imagined!!! I contend that if evolution were true the estimate of nine million extinct animal species is way too small!!! For example, if evolution were true, and given that humans exist and that Woolley Mammoths did exist at one time, there would have been a different path (diverting at some point) from the "first living cell" to Woolley Mammoths than from the "first living cell" to humans. This is because humans are not "descended" from Woolley Mammoths. So where are the bones (in the fossil record) for the 100 different species which "evolved" just before the Woolley Mammoth (which would not have been "ancestor species" of humans - no way!!) if evolution were true??? My point is that if evolution were true, the paleontologists have not found anywhere near enough unique animal fossils because, for example, scientists have not found enough species that would qualify as species which "evolved" into Woolley Mammoths!!! This would be true for every other large mammal which is extinct!!! What this means the real number of animals which have been on this planet (which are extinct) is almost certainly far greater than nine million if evolution were true!!! I am not aware of scientists identifying any giant mammal which looks anything like a Woolley Mammoth. In other words, paleontologists have not identified any gigantic mammal species from which Woolley Mammoths evolved!!! Because this would apply to many species, not just Woolley Mammoths, there are many, many, many species which evolution is missing in the fossil record!!! To be more specific, if evolution created Woolley Mammoths, the atheists and evolutionists cannot identify any mammals which Woolley Mammoths would have directly evolved from!!! This is bad news for the atheists and evolutionsts because it means that the estimate of 9,000,000 extinct animal species is far too small because if we did this exercise for any other large mammal species that scientists know about, scientists cannot identify any other mammal which is similiar enough to that animal that the animal could have "evolved" directly from that animal species!!! Ask any paleontologist to name the 100 animals which existed just before the Woolley Mammal existed. They cannot find a single species that could have been one of these 100 animals!!! This means that the number of estimated animal species which are now extinct (if evolution were true) is significantly larger than currently estimated. This also means that there have been a lot more types of DNA strands and a lot more types of cells and a lot more explanations how a fertilized egg became a baby animal than currently estimated. This means that the theory of evolution is far, far more absurd that currently imagined because it must explain where these animals came from even though we have no fossil record of them!!!!! This is important: if God created all of these species, there does not need to be an "ancestor species" of Woolley Mammoths or any other animal!!!
Did Humans Evolve From The First Living Cell (We Had To If Evolution Were True)???Let us start thinking about humans having "evolved" from the "first living cell." First, let us remember, that if there was no God, there would be no spirits to control cell divisions, so all cell divisions, and all new DNA strands at each level, would have had to come to exist purely by the brainless accidents of evolution. How did the DNA of the first human father and the DNA of the first human mother "evolve" together (i.e. at the length and function of DNA level) from the "first living cell?" And how were the four DNA strands synchronized, for each species after slightly improved species, as the DNA of the males and females evolved independently for millions of years?? And don't forget the latitude, longitude and timeframe issues!!! And where are the massive, massive, massive numbers of failures in creating new DNA caused by invalid permutations of nucleotides when creating four new and improved DNA strands for each new and improved species??? And to compliment what I said above: suppose the male DNA evolved slightly faster (say 1% faster) than the female DNA evolved (or vice versa). Within several new species their DNA would not align and they would not have been able to have any children that survived because their DNA was not compatible!! That species would be the end of evolution for that line. So four DNA strands, starting with the first animal, must evolve together for species after species after species after species in the same latitude, longitude and timeframe, and at the same rate, until humans existed!!! But even thinking about these things, the insane claims of the atheists/evolutionists considering all of the problems with creating a single new species from an existing species are not going to change!!! I don't think the atheists and evolutionists are very good at mathematics. Male DNA and female DNA had to be designed by God, for each species with a male and female!! Evolution could never have designed four new massively sophisticated computer programs/databases (DNA) that could be integrated together to create a new species. And evolution certainly could not have done it in the same timeframe and same locations on the earth. And remember that if there were no spirits to control cell divisions, the Sixteen Cells Paradox would utterly destroy the theory of evolution!!!!!! And don't forget the unique set of cells needed by each species!!! Not only would the DNA be constantly changing (as evolution progressed), but the set of cell types and combinations of cell types and locations of cells in the body would constantly be changing!!! You will never see the above several paragraphs in a science book or biology book at the high school or college level!!! The only thing the authors of these books want is more converts to atheism!!!
Hello: How About Teaching Good Science In Schools!!!The evolution debate post 1953 (when DNA was discovered) is not about science, it is about God. If you assume God does not exist, or if you believe God does not exist, you will likely believe in the theory of evolution no matter how absurd it is. And you will use your vivid imagination to fill in the gaps where the theory of evolution has massive problems. The theory of evolution progresses in popularity because of atheists!!!! Unfortunately, many people who believed in God have been tricked into believing in evolution. In fact, that is the precise purpose of the highly sophisticated deceptions of the atheists and evolutionists (and I have only talked about a few of their deceptions on this home page) and why it is taught in most schools, but not all schools. In some private schools, owned by a religious group, "creation science" or "intelligent design" is taught and in other schools there are disclaimers about evolution. PAY VERY CLOSE ATTENTION TO WHAT I AM ABOUT TO SAY - I WILL SAY IT TWICE BECAUSE IT IS VERY, VERY, VERY IMPORTANT!!!: Here is an interesting idea that judges and school administrators should consider: HOW ABOUT TEACHING SCIENTIFIC FACTS INSTEAD OF TEACHING SCIENCE FICTION (I.E. THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION)!!!!!! Wow, what a novel idea - who would have thought about teaching good science instead of scientific fantasies in the classrooms?? As I mentioned above: "evolution" doesn't even exist in any tangible form!!!! I doubt that anyone in any school has ever thought about these things!!! Teaching creation science is NOT teaching religion because everything that is taught is easily proven mathematically and scientifically!!! It is the atheists and evolutionists who are teaching religion and science fiction because there is no scientific basis for atheism or evolution!!! Let me repeat what I just said because I am serious about this issue: Here is an interesting idea that judges and school administrators should consider: HOW ABOUT TEACHING SCIENTIFIC FACTS INSTEAD OF TEACHING SCIENCE FICTION (I.E. THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION)!!!!!! Wow, what a novel idea - who would have thought about teaching good science instead of scientific fantasies in the classrooms?? Has any federal or state Supreme Court judge outlawed the teaching of very good science??? Well, yes!!! More often than not!!! Atheism (i.e. the theory of evolution) is the official religion of most state and federal judges in the United States!!! The word "God" does not appear in the Constitution but this is from Article [I] in the Constitution: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Well, the word "religion" implies there is a God in Heaven!!! So for any judge to claim that God cannot be mentioned in school needs to study the Constitution!!! "Creation Science" is NOT a religion!!!!!! It is pure science and the conclusion of this solid science is that God is alive and well!!! There is NOTHING in the Constitution to prevent talking about God!!! I have some very, very, very, very, very bad news for some judges: the very person you persecute and claim does not exist IS THE VERY PERSON WHO WILL DETERMINE WHERE YOU WILL SPEND ETERNITY!!!! I should repeat that about a million more times until they get it through their thick, arrogant heads!!! Would they bet their life that they can prove that it is possible that the four DNA strands needed to create each of the 10 million animal species (that is 40 million highly sophisticated DNA strands) could have all formed by pure accidents without any significant evidence of failures!!!!??? Well, actually, if evolution were true, there would have been bones for well over 500 million extinct species/fossils, 490 million of which would have gone extinct in the process of trying to create the necessary DNA and cells and set of cell types/locations for each of the 10 million species we know about!!! Remember, "evolution" is imaginary and brain dead!!! In other words, there would be many millions of failures in creating the 10 million viable species because "evolution" didn't get it right and instead created defective species (i.e. defective DNA strands and/or defective cells and/or inadequate cell types in the correct locations) and thus most attempts to create a new species failed to create a new species!!! Remember, in the real world there is no evidence of any failures in creating the 10 million animal species!!! But no one cares about truth, all they care about is popularity and perpetuating atheism/evolution!!! Biology is no longer about science, it is about creative thinking as to how every discovery in science can be attributed to the theory of evolution (i.e. "without God") in order to get more converts to atheism. Atheists are not interested in truth, they are only interested in getting converts to atheism. And I can guarantee you that pride is the foundation of "modern science"!!! One of the key deceptions of the atheists and evolutionists, to get converts, is their definition of the term "species." They define the term "species" in such a way that each "variety" of dog is a different "species." To them a Chihuahua and a Great Dane are different "species." This gives them the latitude to claim that they have observed a new "species" form by evolution and that evolution is therefore true!!! But if the term "unique species" is defined to be "an animal species with a unique DNA structure" (as it should be) then they have never seen a new "species" be created!!!! Nor will they ever see a new species be created by accidents or by the human breeding of animals. Their bogus claims amount to deceiving students by using clever definitions!!! If someone assumed that humans were the smartest animal on this planet, which we are, then certainly no other species (e.g. bonobos) could ever have had the intelligence to design new DNA for a new species because humans cannot do it!!! In other words, if humans are not smart enough to design DNA, then bonobos are not smart enough to design DNA!!!!! And, believe it or not, accidents are dumber than bonobos!!! Bonobos would be proud of that!!! And if we evolved from bonobos, why is there such a gigantic, gigantic difference in our intelligences!!!!! Could the brainless accidents of evolution convert a really stupid animal into human beings with our intelligence??? Not even humans can do that!!!! In fact, scientists themselves cannot create a new species if a person uses the correct definition of "species" (i.e. a "species" is each group of animals which have identical DNA structures, including the same functions in the same places).
So I guess that "evolution" is the smartest thing on this planet because: So that makes mindless accidents massively smarter than humans (including judges)!!! This may be one reason why atheists and evolutionists don't like to talk about DNA, they like to tell stories and use deceptions, such as by using very clever drawings and deceptive definitions.
Seven chapters in one of the free eBooks on this website are devoted to deceptive definitions!!! In this article read the seven chapters (i.e. chapter 10-16) about "Deception Through Teminology": All levels of judges and all levels of politicians and all levels of school administrators will ultimately be judged BY THE VERY PERSON that their policies forbid talking about in school. I can tell you who is going to win in the long run - the very same God that they claim doesn't exist!!!!!!!!!! These people will spend eternity exactly where the person they claim doesn't exist tells them to spend eternity (after Judgment Day)!! It is important to understand that I am not talking about the government endorsing the God of any specific religion (unless the religion owns the school), I am talking about endorsing a generic God, meaning a God who is not connected to any specific religion!!! I agree that in public schools no specific religion should be endorsed but they can certainly talk about a generic God. The term "God" does not belong to any specific religion!!! Good science proves, beyond any doubt, that there is a super-intelligent God who can sequence the DNA of 10 million animal species!!! Judges should be smart enough to know the difference between a "generic God" versus the God of any specific religion. There is no reason that "scientific facts that prove a generic God exists" should not be taught in school because the theory of evolution is scientific nonsense!!! So kicking God out of all public schools guarantees that incredibly bad science (i.e. evolution which is a precursor to atheism) is taught in the school!!! And schools should be allowed to describe the differences in beliefs of the major religions in the city the school resides in. Judgment Day is not about how popular a person is with their peers or students, it is about KNOWING AND LIVING THE TRUTH after a person has done everything they can do to find the truth (totally independent of popularity)!!! Let's look at a simple example of deceptive definitions of the atheists/evolutionists.
Deceptive Definitions In More DetailFrom a purely scientific perspective there is absolutely zero evidence for the theory of evolution!!! To the atheists and evolutionists, something must save the theory of evolution!!! Enter - deceptive definitions - the salvation of the theory of evolution!!! Let me give you a quick example of clever definitions. There are two kinds of "evolution." One is microevolution and one is macroevolution. Microevolution is nothing more than variety within the same species. For example, there are many, many different kinds/breeds of "dogs" (e.g. Boxers, Chihuahua, Great Danes, etc.). Each of these "dogs" has exactly the same DNA structure but not the same DNA sequence (meaning their DNA has the same functions in the same locations but their sequences of nuclotides are not the same). For example, a Poodle and a Beagle and a Chihuahua and a Pug and a Golden Retriever and a Boxer, etc. all have exactly the same DNA structure, meaning the section having to do with the color and locations of the colors of fur/patterns are in the same locations on their DNA. This is variety within the same species (i.e. the species "dog") and is called microevolution. Macroevolution means that "evolution" has created a new and improved species from an existing species (e.g. human DNA evolved from bonobo DNA), meaning there is new and improved DNA structure and a new and improved species!! Here is my point: there has never been a proven example of Macroevolution (i.e. a new DNA structure has been created by the pure accidents of evolution)!!! Remember from other sections on this home page, to create a new species from an old species requires four new and improved DNA strands!!! That is one of the nails in the coffin of the theory of evolution. The fact that macroevolution has never, never, never been observed is not going to stop the atheists and evolutionists!!! What the atheists and evolutionists will do is look at an example of microevolution and claim it is an example of "evolution" (i.e. macroevolution). But this is a lie because there is no new DNA sequence in terms of function!!! They are using a word with the term "evolution" built inside so the reader or student thinks that the teacher is talking about macroevolution, which would be true evolution. Because of this deception the student may believe in the theory of evolution. But it is a lie because microevolution is not true evolution, it is variety within the same species (i.e. variety within the same DNA structure)!! The term "DNA structure" for a specific species means the length of the DNA is the same and the functions within that structure are in the same locations. Thus a Boxer "dog" and a Chihuahua "dog" have DNA with the same length and each functional area of the DNA are in the same section of DNA. Claiming there is a new "species" should mean there is a new set of 4 DNA strands created purely by accidents, meaning there is a new DNA structure for four new DNA strands for the new species!!! The key is that the teacher may be defining the word "species" to include examples of microevolution so they can claim they have seen an example of "evolution"!!! It is a clever deception!!! I can assure you that God is not amused by this tactic!!! Maybe I should repeat that last sentence about a thousand times!!! The terms "new DNA structure on four new DNA strands" and "new species" and "macroevolution" should mean exactly the same thing!! But no scientist has ever observed a true example of macroevolution and they never will!!!! So they must use deceptions to get converts!!
Cell Biology Books, Some Written By Creation ScientistsI would love to have a staff of people dig through all of the pro-evolution and anti-evolution books which have been printed. I am sure I would learn many, many things from the anti-evolution books and websites. Cells are so sophisticated that the average person would have to go to school for a couple of years just to understand a basic document about the sophistication of cells written by a PhD in Cell Biology of Microbiology!!! I don't know how many cell biology books mention "evolution," but the sophistication of cells is clearly a proof that evolution is nonsense. I own a giant textbook on Cell Biology which is called: The World Of The Cell, Fourth Edition, by Becker, Kleinsmith and Hardin. This textbook is 845 pages. I also own a book called The Dictionary of Cell and Molecular Biology by J.M. Lackie. It is 725 pages and the print is small. While these books are pro-evolution, they are good for something. They clearly prove that there are thousands of reasons the theory of accidents cannot be true due to the sophistication of cells; and this does not include the many issues created purely by the DNA in almost all cells!!
I also own two books which were written by "creation scientists" [yes, people who openly admit that they believe in God also write books] and I am sure there are many other creation science books on this topic: These two men obviously believe that God had to create the many different kinds of cells on this earth (all species are made of cells) because they could not have been created by accidents. Every microorganism on this planet is far more sophisticated than any jet airplane on this planet!!! It is not even close!!! If all of the cells on this planet were taken away from this planet there would not be a single living thing on this planet, not even a bacteria!!!
What is Life? (A Very, Very Important Section That Atheists Have No Answer For)"Life" is a major problem for the theory of evolution. Because the atheists/evolutionists do not believe in God they do not believe that any living thing has a "spirit" or has any life after death!! Let us look at the issue: "what is life?" For example, if you took a fish and left it out of the water until it died, and then an hour after it died you put it back into the water, why doesn't it come back to life? All of the raw elements for life (including all of the DNA and cells) are still functional and still in the fish, so why doesn't it come back to life? There is something more to "life" than just cells and oxygen and water. That would be a spirit!!! When the spirit leaves, there is no way to bring an animal back to life unless God allows the spirit to return (after it had left). Furthermore, have the evolutionists and atheists ever proven that life can be created from non-life (i.e. inorganic materials)?? Never, never, never - yet they continue to preach atheism. While several attempts have been made to create life from non-life (e.g. Miller-Urey, Wong, et. al. and Hartgerink), the scientists have not only failed to create life, they have also failed to prove it can be done!! The term "biogenesis" means that living things only arise from other living things.
Here is a different creation science website which has an excellent article on this subject: That article only mentions DNA 8 times, so it is not the type of article I would write, but it is still very good. For example, have scientists put a large shell over a pond, which had no life, meaning there was no DNA and no cells (this simulates "prebiotic" conditions, meaning "existing before life"), and observed "life" form by a series of accidents, including RNA or DNA inside of a "first living cell" (in that pond), that was alive and had the ability to divide itself into two cells (which would be required for complex life to survive and evolve) and it had something to eat??? Never!! Actually, that experiment could never be done because it would be impossible to prove there is no life in any pond before beginning the experiment!!! Yes, even the "first living cell" (if it is our ancestor) had to eventually divide into two cells (etc.) for life to perpetuate!!! How could something that simple divide into two cells?? The "warm pond" thing has no credibility. I don't think the temperature of the water can overcome the statistical problems with creating a living cell, which can divide into two cells (and have something to eat that is not made out of rocks), using the mindless accidents of evolution!!! And don't forget the physical constants, and the incredible accuracy needed by some of them!!! These could not have come to exist by chance!! Then what is their evidence for evolution? Their only evidence is that many scientists are very arrogant and they do not believe in God and thus they have no choice except to use their God-given brains to deceive people into believing that everything in the Universe (including the Universe itself), including human DNA, occurred by chance. Maybe they don't know yet that DNA was discovered in 1953!!! The theory of evolution should have been thrown in the trash can when DNA was discovered and when the complexity of cells was also discovered. Yet, as scientists learn more and more about DNA and cells, the atheists continue to cling to the theory of evolution as if it were still 1859, when Darwin's first book was published.
Every new discovery leads to a new fairy tale to explain how something came to exist by accident. Just like gasoline fuels a car, pride and popularity fuel of the theory of evolution!!! The only thing that is "evolving" on this planet is the theory of evolution as evolutionists/atheists constantly need to develop new spin to account for the new discoveries about the sophistication of cells, the morphing of the embryo algorithms on DNA, etc. Actually, the atheists and evolutionists make no attempt to explain how accidents could have created any living thing on this planet. It is much easier to just give "evolution" the credit and to mock and ignore anyone who is not an atheist. Mocking requires a lot less work than research!!! I should repeat that about a thousand times!!! There are so many atheists and evolutionists in just about every college in America that everyone assumes you are an atheists and evolutionists. It is the creation scientists who are the oddballs - even though the creation scientists are correct!!! I cannot even begin to explain how much pride is the foundation of the theory of evolution!!!
Can Accidents Or Simplicity (In General) Create Complexity?As one example of complexity, the human eyes are unbelievable in complexity. Yet the sections on human DNA which create the human eyes must be far more complex than the eyes themselves (this is assuming there are no spirits which the atheists claim)!! And the intelligence who designed the DNA (God) must be far more complex than the DNA itself!! In other words, simplicity never creates complexity. Intelligence is top-down, not bottom-up!!! Let me repeat that, simplicity never creates complexity. Intelligence is top-down, not bottom-up!!! To understand these concepts, consider these items:
First, consider that a human-designed computer program exists because: 1) The human intelligence to design and build the microprocessor, including designing and building the memory chips. 2) The human intelligence to write the computer language. 3) The human intelligence to write the computer language compiler. 4) The human intelligence to write the computer program. Second, consider the output of the computer program which is printed on a piece of paper. Here is the question: how can the printout on the piece of paper be more sophisticated than the human intelligence needed to design and create the microprocessor (and memory chips), design and write the computer language, design the complier, design and write the computer program, etc.?? It can't!! Let's think about the memory chips in computers. My son John retired from working for a company in Idaho that makes memory chips. At times he would be monitoring the creation of memory chips. The company he worked for had about five-billion dollars' worth of equipment which were needed to create memory chips!!! The memory chips cannot be more complex than the machines that made them, and the machines that made them cannot be more complex than the humans who designed them and the humans who built them!! Simplicity cannot create complexity!! There has never been a functional, useful machine (or computer program) on this planet that was not designed and built by human beings!! Not a single one of them was written by a random number generator to simulate evolution!! Let me repeat that: There has never been a functional, useful machine (or computer program) on this planet that was not designed and built by human beings!! Not a single one of them was written by a random number generator to simulate evolution!! But "evolution" is just the opposite. It starts with something too small to see with the naked eyes (e.g. a First Living Cell) and over time, using nothing but pure accidents, species got stronger, larger, more intelligent, etc. until humans came to exist!!! With nothing but pure accidents, things just get better and better and better ...!!! I think someone has been sniffing something illegal.
The Human BrainConsider the sophistication of DNA such that it creates a person's brain. Let us think about a pianist. A pianist must be able to convert many thousands on dots on a sheet of music into the movements of their fingers!! To do this the DNA must create the nerves between their eyes and their brain, then the brain must process these dots and then the brain must send signals to the fingers of the pianist. And the DNA must create the muscles on their fingers, etc. If all of this is in place, and much more, and with thousands of hours of practice, spread over many years, a pianist can play the Rachmaninoff Piano Concerto #3!!
Here is a YouTube video of Anna Fedorova playing the Rachmaninoff Piano Concerto #3 (watch for at least 3 and a half minutes so you see her fingers when she really gets going)!!! Better yet you can just listen to it and continue reading. You will know when her fingers are really flying around: Try to teach a bonobo to play this piano concerto!!! It would never happen!!! Humans are special because we are the children of God. Many years ago I had a friend named Billy Marsden who, if you put sheet music in front of him that he had never seen before, he could play this music immediately. He is the nicest guy in the world!!! If you put such a piece of sheet music in front of me, I wouldn't have the slightest clue how to play that piece of music!!! And most people would not do any better than I would. Many people have incredible talents that the average person does not have. How could evolution have created these special "gifts" (i.e. "talents") that only a very, very small number of humans have?? Here is my point: what created our DNA, which in turn created our brain (DNA would have to control cell divisions if there was no God and no spirits), had to be far, far smarter than our DNA and our brain!!! That would be God. Much of what we can do comes from our spirit and God merged our spirits with our bodies. Somewhere in this process "talents" were created, which came from both our DNA (which came from our parents) and our spirits. Maybe we learned many things while we were still spirits (before we were born with a physical body). Accidents (i.e. evolution) have zero intelligence so how could accidents create something with intelligence? They can't!! Intelligence is a top-down process and someone a lot smarter than humans had to design human DNA and the DNA for every one of the several million species of animals on this planet which have or do exist, all of which have a male and female. Which is more intelligent: accidents or monkeys?? Think about that. Obviously monkeys. The limit of monkey intelligence is far higher than the limit of accidents!!! But monkeys cannot design and create the DNA for an extinct species or write or play a piano concerto!!! Could accidents or monkeys design and build a Buick automobile? Of course not. It takes a lot of intelligence, including many different specialties, to build a Buick automobile. Only humans can build an automobile. Likewise, only God could have sequenced the DNA and created the cells for several million species of plants, animals and insects.
A Summary and Overview Of Some Key IssuesBefore the summary let me just say that this website has been around since about 2004. Some of the articles on this website are so old that I have not looked at them for well over 3 or 4 years!!! So I guarantee there are many mistakes scattered among all of the articles and books on this website!!! This home page has far less mistakes than the articles because this is the first article that people see so I spend most of my time working on this home page!!! So far we have barely touched the surface of the reasons evolution cannot be true (remember I have a single article with more than 400 reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true), yet even at this point we have no logical choice except to conclude that God exists. Different religions may have different beliefs about God, but there is no choice except to say that God does exist. In the Mormon religion (The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints) there are three separate Gods in the Godhead. The head God (Heavenly Father), the Savior (Jesus Christ, who is also a God in the Godhead) and the Holy Ghost (who is also a God in the Godhead). Some other Christian religions believe that the three members of the Godhead are manafest in one God. If scientists are so smart, and they believe that no God exists, can they create a Universe with a planet like Earth that has (though most are extinct) several million animal species which have both males and females? And every animal had/has unique DNA and a unique set of many different kinds of cells!!! Without realizing it, scientists are constantly claiming that accidents are massively smarter than they are because THEY cannot create a single living cell with functional DNA inside which they sequenced!!! Of course they use the term "evolution" instead of "accidents." Either way, they need to take some classes in logic because they cannot sequence a single DNA strand yet they claim that accidents can!!! A high school student can figure out that there is something wrong with that logic!!! The evolution debate is not about where bones came from, it is about where DNA and cells came from!!! In other words, when you see fossils, think about the DNA and cells that created these animals (if there is no God and no spirits)!! How did the "morphing of the embryo" algorithms come to exist for many, many complex species, especially when there is a male and female in the species (as all animals have)? The Sixteen Cells Paradox applies to all animals past and present!!! And where are the failures of nothing but brainless accidents??
The Spirit WorldAll living things, by definition, have spirits. Life comes from spirits. Spirits cannot die - EVER!!! And I assume this applies to animals as well. A spirit is a spirit!! Spirits can travel at the speed of light!! So if a person in the spirit world, who lives in Sweden for example, wants to see someone in the physical world or spirit world in Missouri, it only takes them the blink of an eye to get there!!! If you want to, when you are in the spirit world, I suspect you can track down some Woolley Mammoths!!! I don't know why not!! If you want to meet Hitler (I don't know why anyone would want to do that), you can visit him!! The spirit world is on this planet although spirits can pretty much go anywhere they want to go (e.g. to the moon or Mars). When a person (or animal for that matter) dies they remain on this planet (as a spirit) and at that time they can see other spirits of departed people or even departed animals!!! We cannot see spirits until we die, unless Heavenly Father approves it. But they can see us not matter what. It is very, very, very, very rare when Heavenly Father lets a mortal see a spirit!!!!! It has only happened to me once, and that was an emergency to end all emergencies!!! You cannot believe how different my life would have been without getting key information from that spirit who was allowed to appear to me and give me key information!!! My wife died in 2016 (after 44 years of marriage) and she is now in the spirit world in Norway (where she was born). There are a heck of a lot more spirits on this planet (for animals and humans) than there are people and animals that we can see!!! Note this carefully: every human being who has ever lived on this planet (starting with Adam and Eve, who were obviously resurrected shortly after Christ's resurrection), who has died and not been resurrected, is in the spirit world!!! We don' know where Adam and Eve are because they have been resurrected. Here is an interesting question: where are the people who have already been resurrected??? Well, all of them were very rightous, so where are they?? I have no clue. Infants and children who die before the age of 8 (which includes hundreds of millions of children) are guaranteed eternal salvation!!! They were too holy to behold the ways of man. I have a granddaughter in the spirit world. She died before she was 8 so she was and is a very special person!!!! I look forward to meeting her in the spirit world after I die. So not only is George Washington, Hitler and Stalin, etc. in the spirit world, but I assume that all deceased animals are in the spirit world (spirits cannot die and all animals have spirits). It is scary to think that Woolley Mammoths have spirits that certainly exist in the "spirit world" (all of them have died so all of their spirits should still be on this planet in the spirit world)!!!
For those who have loved ones in the spirit world (and we all do), here is an incredibly scholarly article on the spirit world which is on the BYU website which was written by Professor Brent L. Top: The "temptations" he mentioned in his article were mortal temptations. However, I can guarantee you that spirits can also be subject to temptations!! A person could theoretically drop from the Celestial Kingdom (at the time they die) to the Telestial Kingdom (by the time of the Second Coming of Christ, which is also called "Judgment Day") because of what a person does in the spirit world!!! The spirit world is not all it is cracked up to be!!!! The phrase "Endure to the End" should be translated: "Endure To The Second Coming," because that is the true Judgment Day where our eternal destinies will be determined!!! Until then we can go up and down in "spirituality," even in the spirit world.
In SummaryIt is far beyond the scope of this home page to talk about many subjects. But trust me: the probability of a viable permutation of nucleotides, to create both a male and female for a single advanced species (the permutation of nucleotides on the DNA would have to be almost perfect in order to perform the morphing of the embryo for both a male and female offspring, even if DNA is primarily a database) is insanely improbable. The issue of permutations of nucleotides is the real death of the theory of evolution!!!!! This is not an issue that can be "explained away" with fancy storytelling and vivid imaginations!!! It is pure mathematics!!!! The statistical problems created by permutations of nucleotides make the theory of evolution look very, very bad!!! Here is an interesting paradox: which came first the cell or the DNA inside that cell?? If the DNA came first, how did a cell get created and then the DNA get put inside of this cell without damaging the cell and the DNA?? If the cell came first, there is nothing inside of a cell that can create a DNA strand or even modify it, much less sequence it. In summary, here are just a few of the key reasons that evolution (i.e. accidents) could never have created human beings: 1) Obtaining a viable permutation of nucleotides on DNA, that could create a human baby (or even be a database for the spirit), is statistically impossible. Considering all animal species it would be far more likely to pick a single atom which is hidden among many, many quadrillions of Universes. This is NOT an exaggeration!! Permutation issues (considering all animal species) are the #1 reason the theory of evolution cannot be true!!! 2) Creating DNA from scratch (e.g. for the "first living cell") is impossible for many reasons (however, humans can do this, but they do not know how to sequence the nucleotides), 3) Creating a cell from scratch, by accidents, is impossible for many reasons - the inside of a cell is like a small city - (humans cannot do this), 4) Creating life from non-life is impossible and has never been done (though it has been attempted), 5) Creating the mechanisms in the cell, which use the DNA as patterns to create proteins, is impossible to happen by accident. For example, how does this mechanism know WHERE on the DNA a specific protein code is located and how does it FIND THAT SECTION?? If scientists know the answers to these two questions, how can they claim that these mechanisms came to exist by accident?? Only 1% of DNA is coded for proteins (the WHERE ARE THE KEY SECTIONS OF DNA issue is a topic by itself), 6) Creating the mechanisms inside the cell to constantly protect and check the integrity of the DNA strand, 7) And so on. Just ask any computer programmer how long it would take to write a complex computer program using code written exclusively by random number generators. It would never happen!! And "evolution" is a heck of a lot slower than computers!!!
Bar charts are a very good way to compare intelligence to no intelligence. Look at each bar chart in this chapter in one of the free eBooks on this website (you do not need to read the chapter, just look at the bar charts) and then look carefully at the last bar chart to see a histogram of pure randomness/accidents (i.e. a histogram of what evolution would create every time!!!): Yes, the flat bar chart is exactly what evolution / accidents would create every time. No living thing could exist with a flat bar chart. More is said about this issue in the two "Kehr's Paradox" articles. In short, "evolution" has the intelligence of Superman and every DNA strand created by "imaginary evolution" or by real accidents would have roughly an equal number of A, C, G and T nucleotides assuming that evolution has equal access to an equal and unlimited number of each type of nucleotide!!! So if humans cannot sequence and create from scratch DNA or RNA (well they can create DNA, but they cannot sequence it), plus a cell for the DNA or RNA to exist inside, and give their new cell "life," with a new spirit and a viable permutation of nucleotides to provide information for the spirit, why would anyone believe that a series of pure accidents (i.e. evolution) could have created the "first living cell" in a sterile pond (Note: by definition, before the "first living cell" there was no life and nothing for the "first living cell" to eat)?? Something that had nothing to eat (the "first living cell" had nothing to eat because it was the first life on this planet by definition) could not have survived eating nothing but rocks and sand. Nor could it have divided to perpetuate the "species." In order for evolution to be true: accidents would have to be many thousands of times smarter than humans!!!!!!! Let me repeat that: In order for evolution to be true: accidents would have to be many thousands of times smarter than humans!!!!!!! Many reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true are mentioned in various other articles on this website, such as the "Welcome To More Than 400 Reasons Evolution Cannot Be True!!" article.
The Evolution DebateThere are probably hundreds of books which are favorable to the theory of evolution and there are probably hundreds of books which are strongly critical of the theory of evolution!! There are also many YouTube videos on both sides of the debate. Those who are critical of the theory of evolution are called "creation scientists" or "creationists" or "intelligent design" people because they believe that scientific data favors a "Creator" of the Universe. In fact, if you want to get published in a leading biology journal you better be an atheist and your article better support the theory of evolution. If it does not praise Darwin and evolution your article will end up in the trash can, not in a "science" journal!!! They will not even read your paper!! They love popularity and they are deathly afraid that someone will claim that they believe in God (their status would drop through the floor)!!! You cannot believe how literal that last paragraph was!!!! Let me repeat that because it explains why the theory of evolution still exists: they are deathly afraid that someone will claim that they believe in God (their status would drop through the floor)!!! If a college student writes an article and the teacher/professor sees the word "God" or the word "Adam" (in a favorable way) within a fraction of a second the paper will be in the trash can!!! Pride is a massive, massive problem in most universities!!! From the incomprehensible sophistication of DNA, to the amazing number and complexity of cell types (some of which are transparent), to the earth we live on, to the ends of the Milky Way Galaxy, to the furthest galaxy cluster and supercluster (by the way, the supercluster we live in is called the Laniakea Supercluster which has about 100,000 galaxies), and considering the "constants" in physics (e.g. the gravitational constant); the credibility of the theory of evolution has dropped to ABSOLUTE ZERO!!! There are about 110,000,000,000 GALAXIES!!! This number will go up and up and up and up as bigger and bigger telescopes are put into space. This number will never stop growing permanently, it will always grow as telescopes (especially in space) get bigger and better!!! By the way, astonomers know of many exoplanets which, by definition, are stars with at least one orbiting planet. Many of these planets, like ours, likely have life on them. Perhaps some of them are being prepared by God to have a new set of human spirits be placed into human bodies to be tested and trained. Yes, there is a new Adam and Eve for many or all of these exoplanets!!! The planet earth is an exoplanet. If you picked a specific galaxy, any galaxy, I wonder how many of the stars in this galaxy would have one or more orbiting planets which have intelligent life on them??? Probably a lot of them!!! Such a fact would not have surprised the leaders of the Latter-Day Saint church even in the very early days of the church. In the early days of the church there was a "star" that was said to be the star that was closest to the throne of God. It's name was said to be Kolob!!!
See this article about where God came from and the poem about where God came from (LDS version of course): Did you notice that amazing poem about God by William W. Phelps (1792-1872) (search for the phrase: "hie to Kolob" in the first line of the poem)!!!
Other Anti-Evolution BooksIf you listen to the propaganda of the pro-evolution monopoly you might think that anyone who believes in creation science (i.e. God) is a dolt. Nothing could be further from the truth. There are many "creation scientists" (i.e. those who believe God created this Universe) who are brilliant and have no problems seeing through the false science generated by the scientific establishment. In fact, many anti-evolution books have been written by brilliant scientists. This listing of anti-evolution books and DVDs contains only a small sampling of the anti-evolution books which exist in print. In fact, there are hundreds of anti-evolution books. Many of the books were written by PhDs in the sciences. The arguments in these books totally shred the theory of evolution from a scientific standpoint. Some of these books may be out of print so you may have to use a book finder, such as Alibris, to find them.
Here is a link to this appendix (some of these 30 or so books may push a specific religious denomination):
By the way the "young earth" concept is caused by damage done to the book of Genesis in the Bible over centuries of time. This damage caused people to claim that the entire Universe was created in a few days time. If this were true, we would not be able to see distant galaxies yet or even most of the stars in our own galaxy. In the Mormon/Latter-Day Saint church, the Pearl Of Great Price (expecially the Book of Moses) was largely written to fix the damage to the book of Genesis.
If you know of any book or CD that needs to be added to my list, please let me know. Here is a Google search that will yield over 3,000 hits: If you have read this far: pat yourself on the back!!!!! Good job, now go and tell many others!!!!!
And don't forget the article which lists many articles on this website, most of which are not mentioned on this home page: The above article is linked to in the next article I will talk about.
When you are ready to read one or more of the four free eBooks on this website, here is an article which links to the four free eBooks on this website (and it links to an article which mentions more than 400 reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true) and it links to other articles (such as for Latter-Day Saints). Two of the four eBooks have links to the individual chapters of the book: And don't forget to tell your friends about this website, whether in person or by email or by social media. Thanks in advance!!!
|
