Welcome To The "Prophets Or Evolution" Website!!

This website contains two free eBooks and more than three dozen free articles on special topics regarding the theory of evolution debate!! Nothing is sold on this website!! In addition, this website has some articles for Latter-Day Saints (i.e. Mormons). This section has a yellow background, like this section. However, anyone is welcome to read any article!!

I am a retired, world famous cancer researcher of natural medicine!! I worked with about 13,000 cancer patients over more than a ten year period!! For adults who want to prevent ever getting cancer (required if you are over 50) or to treat cancer with vastly superior natural medicine see the article on my biography at the very bottom of this page. There is a lot of incredible information in that article!!

Both my email address and a link to my Biography are at the bottom of this home page!!!

Please share this amazing creation science (i.e. anti-evolution) website with 15 or 20 of your friends on social media (e.g. Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, Pinterest, etc.) and ask your friends to share this site with 15 or 20 of their friends on social media!! Also, please link to this website from your website!!

Be part of the solution!!!

Note: links to other articles on this website almost always open in a new window - so do not worry about losing your place if you click on a link. Links are generally in bright blue.

Introduction To The Theory of Evolution Debate

The average young person today goes to church on the weekends and is told there is a God, but during the week in school they may be taught that the theory of evolution is true and there is no God.

Because of the teaching of the theory of evolution, many, many young people of all religions (starting in middle school in many cases) have lost their faith in God and have quit going to church, or if they are taken to church by their parents, they will go to church but they will not believe anything they hear!!!

Those who teach the theory of evolution in schools will likely imply that all scientists are evolutionists. However, the theory of evolution is NOT universally accepted by all scientists!! There are hundreds of books which have been written to push the theory of evolution and there are hundreds of books which have been written against the theory of evolution!!

Plus, in the scientific community, among those who have not written books, there are many scientists who are very much against the theory of evolution!!!

Those who believe that the scientific evidence strongly supports a belief in God are called "creation scientists." The term "intelligent design" is also used to describe "creation science."

So what is "evolution?" The atheists and evolutionists claim that "evolution" has created the Universe and everything in it that is not man-made, such as cells, the process of cell divisions, the creation of DNA for all species, the sequence of nucleotides on all DNA strands, the oceans, the moon, the galaxies, etc. etc.

But there is a problem. "Evolution" is not a tangible object that can create things!! Evolution is only a belief that there is no God.

Theories and beliefs cannot create things!!! Only tangible things can create other tangible things!!!

But "evolution" is not tangible and it is not a force in nature such as gravity or wind or sunlight!!

"Evolution" is nothing more than a claim or belief that there is no God!! That's it!!! Evolution is not a physical object or a force that can do things!!

Evolution has no arms to create DNA, it has no legs to travel, and evolution has no brain to design and intelligently sequence the DNA and cells for about a million species of living things, many of which have both males and females whose DNA must align in an incredibly precise way!!!

So if there is no God, as claimed by the atheists/evolutionists, then what would be the force in nature that created human DNA and the DNA for all other species??

The atheists and evolutionists have no choice except to claim that the Universe, cells, DNA, etc. were all created by UNINTENTIONAL, UNDIRECTED, PURPOSELESS ACCIDENTS!!!

However, the atheists and evolutionists will never use the term "accidents", they will always pretend that "evolution" is a force in nature"!!!

Not only can evolution not create anything, mindless accidents also cannot create a cell or a DNA strand and it certainly cannot sequence the nucleotides on a new DNA strand!!!

And very, very importantly, neither "evolution" nor "accidents" can intelligently modify the sequence of nucleotides on an existing DNA strand to create a new species of animal from an old species of animal!!

Yet this is precisely what would be required for the DNA of a bonobo (or the DNA of some other primate species) to "evolve" into the vastly more sophisticated human DNA!! See this article (articles typically open in a new window so do not worry about losing your place if you click a link):
Article: Changing The Length Of A DNA Strand

The "bottom line" is that evolution has an I.Q. of ZERO and accidents have an I.Q. of ZERO!!!

Pull out your calculator and do the math:
ZERO (species have been created by the imaginary evolution)
ZERO (species have been created by blind, deaf and dumb accidents)
ZERO PLUS ZERO EQUALS ZERO (i.e. there should be zero life on this planet!!!)

Oh, but the clever definitions of the atheists/evolutionists do not stop with the word "evolution." They also misuse the terms "natural selection," "species," "microevolution" and "macroevolution. See this article on their clever definitions:
Article: Clever Definitions Used By Atheists/Evolutionists

As you read this home page, and the other articles on this website, keep asking yourself: "Could DNA, cells, the Universe, etc. have been created by nothing but blind, deaf and dumb accidents??" That question is the heart and soul of the evolution debate!!!

And if you think God is just barely smarter than we humans, study this article (and remember that God understands DNA as easily as we can understand a Superman comic book):
Article: The Sixteen Cells Mystery!! [Read the entire article!!!]

The "Sixteen Cells Mystery" applies to all animals (male and female), not just humans.

Yes, there very definitely is a God who can design DNA. And as this website makes very, very clear: God is very unhappy with hundreds of people who make their living by writing books, giving lectures, etc., FOR PROFIT, who claim that God does not exist and just as important they mock the miracles of Christ, and the miracles of His servants and they mock His plan of salvation (e.g. Richard Dawkins, the late Christopher Hitchens, Peter Singer, Steven Weinberg and hundreds more).

The "bottom line" is that evolution has an imaginary I.Q. of ZERO and accidents have an I.Q. of ZERO!!!

Humans, and all other species, exist because of God!!! Yes, science has confirmed that the Biblical account of Adam and Eve IS TRUE!!!

As you read this home page, and the other articles on this website, keep asking yourself: "Could DNA, cells, the Universe, etc. have been created by nothing but blind, deaf and dumb accidents??"

That question is the heart and soul of the evolution debate!!!

So let us continue this discussion by talking about something near and dear to our hearts: our wonderful mothers.


The Sophistication Of Human DNA

The most sophisticated computer programs on this planet are human DNA which contain the instructions to create a male and female human baby via billions of cell divisions.

The human DNA strand, which is inside the fertilized egg of a new human mother, contains 3.2 billion nucleotides (A, C, G, or T) , which is a computer program that is so sophisticated that a single cell, with a single DNA strand (the DNA strand is seven feet long but it is coiled up to fit inside of a cell that cannot be seen with the naked eye), namely the fertilized egg inside of a mother-to-be, has the intelligence on the DNA to create an entire human baby, via 30 billion cell divisions, who has 30 billion cells and 60,000 miles of blood vessels, etc.

The 60,000 miles of blood vessels in this newborn baby would wrap around the earth at the equator twice, with 10,000 miles of blood vessels left over!!

When the baby is born he or she will have an incredible brain which is connected to a massive nervous system, a skull to protect the brain, a spine to protect the spinal cord (the spinal cord is a cylindrical bundle of nerve fibers), two eyes which are connected to the nervous system, a beating heart, a liver, a pancreas, 300 bones (which eventually fuse into 206 bones), etc. etc.!!

The DNA in a sperm cell of the father of the baby contributes part of the DNA for the new baby and the DNA in the mother's ovum (egg) contributes part of the DNA for the new baby. Thus, the DNA strands from the mother and father must align with each other!!!

But it is even more complicated than that. Men actually have two types of DNA strands: the DNA in the "male sperm cells" which will lead to a male baby and the DNA in the "female sperm cells" which will lead to a female baby. The DNA in the mother's egg/ovum is gender-neutral.

So if a male sperm cell gets to the mother's egg first (along with its DNA), a male baby will result. If a female sperm cell gets to the mother's egg first (along with its DNA), a female baby will result. The sex of the baby is literally a swimming race of sperm cells to get to the ovum first!! See this amazing YouTube video:
YouTube Video: Conception Explained

But note that the three DNA strands (2 from the father, though only one is used each time conception happens [the one that gets to the ovum first], and one from the mother) must align with each other!!

But the alignment is more sophisticated than you think. For example, the sections of DNA of the father which create the liver, for example, must align with the sections of DNA of the mother which create the liver!!! Ditto for many other parts of the DNA of both mother and father.

And all of this applies to THREE DNA strands - 2 of the father and 1 of the mother!! Each male DNA strand from the father (whether to create a male or female baby) must align with the female DNA strand. Each of the three stands has 3.2 billion nucleotides.

In fact, three DNA strands of equal length (the length varies by species) are required for every species which has both a male and female (e.g. elephants, lions, tigers, cats, dogs, mice, etc.)!! And even extinct species such as the Woolly Mammoth and Dodo Bird.

Because of the sophistication of DNA, all of the human scientists on this planet could not create a single DNA strand from scratch and certainly not a human DNA strand. But even if they could, all of the human scientists on this planet could not intelligently sequence (i.e. put the nucleotides in a functional ordering like the object code of a complied computer program) three human DNA strands to create a human baby!!

In fact, scientists are NOT EVEN CLOSE to decoding the entire DNA strand of any species of plants, animals or insects!!!

And there are sophisticated DNA strands (which no team of humans can completely understand) for SEVERAL MILLION species of animals, plants, insects, etc. which currenty live or have lived on this planet!!!

How could all of this DNA have been created by nothing but accidents!!??


Why Adam And Eve Are A Major Target Of The Theory of Evolution!!!

Before going on with the scientific reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true (and there are many, many reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true), we need to talk about why the theory of evolution even exists!!!

In the Book of Mormon, which was published in 1830, which was 29 YEARS BEFORE DARWIN'S FIRST BOOK WAS PUBLISHED, there is the story of the anti-Christ Korihor versus the great prophet of God: Alma the Younger.

For now I want to emphasize that Korihor (who lived about 70 years before Christ was born) was taught his doctrines by a personal appearance of satan!!! Remember, the Book of Mormon was published 29 years before Darwin's first book, so the Book of Mormon was not reacting to the theory of evolution, it was predicting the theory of evolution was coming!!!

So why would satan himself teach Korihor the theory of evolution?? Because the three members of the Godhead (Heavenly Father, Christ and the Holy Ghost) are not the only targets of the theory of evolution. Adam and Eve are also major targets of the theory of evolution!!!

By claiming that humans descended from apes, Adam and Eve are claimed, by evolution, to not have existed.

Here is an article which lists, side-by-side, the teachings of God versus the teachings of the theory of evolution (in this case it is literally the teachings of satan):
Article: LDS Doctrines Versus Evolution Doctrines In Alma 30

However, all of us (this includes you), existed as spirits long, long before we were born on this planet. In fact, sometime before Adam and Eve were put on this planet by God (about 4,000 B.C.) we (that includes you and me) were alive, as spirits, and we were at a meeting called the "Grand Council."

This quote implies that spirits cannot die. Not even an atomic bomb blast can kill a spirit because it is made from a different kind of matter.

It was at the Grand Council that satan (i.e. Lucifer) and his followers were cast out to become the devil and his angels. It was also at this meeting that the prophets, and many others, were chosen to perform their main duties on this planet.

At this meeting Jehovah did not promise to save all people (His plan was a plan of free agency), but Lucifer promised to save all people (his plan would have forced all of us to obey him and would have "saved" all people). Lucifer's plan was rejected by Heavenly Father!!

In other words, sometime before Adam and Eve were put on this earth there was a WAR IN HEAVEN, which we were at and we had to vote on who the Savior would be!!!! The battle was between the forces of Christ, who would later become the Savior, and the forces of Lucifer, who would very quickly become "the devil."

Both men volunteered to be the Savior. Jehovah was chosen and Lucifer rebelled and took countless people with him "down to hell."

This council was INCOMPREHENSIBLY IMPORTANT FOR EACH OF US!!! We would never have a physical body if we did not vote for Jehovah (i.e. Jesus Christ) to be the Savior of the world at this council. Yes, you were there and you voted for Jehovah to be the Savior.

Hitler, Stalin, Lenin, Mao Zedong and all of the other mass murders were there and all of them voted for Jehovah (i.e. Christ). But this life is a different type of test than the Grand Council. It is as if there are two sequential filters - the grand council filter (which has already happended) and the mortality filter (which is ongoing), though the grand council was far, far more dangerous because those who voted for Lucifer (now called the devil) in the Grand Council will never have a physical body!!! These are now the devil and his angels.

We know this council occurred before Adam and Eve were put on this planet (more than 6,000 years ago) because Adam was a key player in the event!!! Adam was essentially the Savior's top General at the Grand Council. So we have existed as spirits far longer than you might think!! But by design we do not remember anything that happened to us before we were born.

Because Adam was the main General of the forces of God and Christ, at the Grand Council, Adam is a key enemy of satan!!! And what does the theory of evolution teach?? Evolution teaches that we "evolved" from primates, meaning it teaches that Adam and Eve never existed!! The theory of evolution bypasses Adam and Eve.

To claim Adam and Eve have never existed, is one of the primary goals of satan as it was Adam who may have been the person who physically cast satan out of the Grand Council as Adam (i.e. Michael) was and still is the Savior's top general!!

The theory of evolution is satan's perfect doctrine because it eliminates the Godhead (Heavenly Father, Christ and the Holy Ghost) and almost as important, the theory of evolution eliminates Adam and Eve from ever existing!!!

The theory of evolution (satan's perfect doctrine) casts Adam and Eve out of even existing by claiming we "evolved" from other primates (e.g. Bonobo)!!!

The classic discourse on the origin of God, and the Grand Council, is the "King Follett Discourse" given by Joseph Smith not long before he was martyred. Here is a link to this article:
Speech: King Follett Discourse (Joseph Smith)

This article is about the Grand Council, which all of us attended (even before Adam and Eve were put on this planet) and was mentioned in the King Follett Discourse:
Article: The Grand Council

The importance of this council, and the importance of our individual vote, cannot even remotely be comprehended!!!

As Adam was a major player in the Grand Council, Adam is a major enemy of satan. This is an article that provides a lot of detail about why the theory of evolution targets Adam and Eve and why the theory of evolution claims they never existed:
Article: Why Adam


Let's Talk About Real Human DNA

Because the atheists have so many problems to deal with, they say that it took "billions of years" (their favorite phrase!!) to accidentally create a DNA strand and then accidentally sequence that DNA strand (so a baby animal survives). They apparently don't know anything about mathematics!!!

There are 43,200,000,000 different ways to sequence a male or female DNA strand. And the vast, vast, vast (insert the word "vast" 2 billion more times) percent of those permutations would not create a living anything. If evolution were true, our entire Universe (and many, many trillions of other Universes) would be full of dead, mutated, partially created animals and evolution would not have created a single viable living animal, much less a human being!!!

The problems with the theory of evolution apply to any species which has both a male and female DNA strand, though their DNA might not be as long as human DNA. But remember, even if the DNA strands were created by accident, the male DNA strand (actually 2 of them) would have to have a viable permutation of nucleotides and so would the female's.

By the way, human DNA is nowhere near the longest DNA strand. Some DNA is more than 40 times longer than human DNA!! But human DNA is the most sophisticated DNA because human DNA is able to create the human brain.

Remember, there are several million "species" of plants, animals and insects on this planet, each with unique and highly sophisticated DNA. And many of these species have both a male and female (e.g. Bonobos) which have three DNA strands, like humans, which need to align in a very precise way!! No team of humans on this planet understand the DNA of an ant, much less human DNA.

In fact, if you added every type of DNA strand on this earth (e.g. male human DNA, male mouse DNA, male horse DNA, ..., female human DNA, female mouse DNA, female horse DNA, ...), the length of this DNA strand would be about one quadrillion (1015) nucleotides long!!

So if one DNA strand (for each species, male and female where applicable) were laid end-to-end, there would be 41,000,000,000,000,000 different ways to sequence all of the different types of DNA strands on this planet. Obviously only a tiny, tiny, tiny fraction of these would yield every type of animal, plant and insect on this planet.

How big is this number?? The number of ATOMS in our Universe is probably less than 41,000

The atheists and evolutionists always counter these facts with the claim that it took "millions of years" for new species to "evolve." The problem is that the DNA permutation issue is so damaging to the theory of evolution that a quadrillion quadrillion quadrillion years of random mutations to DNA COULD NOT CREATE A SINGLE VIABLE DNA STRAND FOR ANY ANIMAL!!!!

The atheists and evolutionists just don't understand or comprehend the mathematics of permutations!!!

But let's get back to human DNA.

Human DNA is the most sophisticated computer program on this planet - by a giant margin!! Human DNA is so sophisticated that scientists still only understand about 2% of human DNA. Yet the atheists and evolutionists want people to believe that DNA and cells and the Universe, etc. were all created by accidents!!!

Not a chance!!!

So what accident created the Universe according to the atheists? The Big Bang. There probably was a Big Bang, that is not the issue, but the question is whether the Big Bang was an accidental explosion or whether it was a carefully planned and executed explosion under the direction of God!! In fact, God delegated the explosion of the Big Bang and this is discussed elsewhere on this website.

On August 21, 2017, several members of my family drove me to Sedalia, Missouri to see a total eclipse of the sun. There is no way that our sun and moon and earth could align, by accident, to create a total eclipse of the sun!! This event is God bragging at His power, majesty and might!!! When we could see the corona of the Sun, we could not see any shadows on the roof where we were located. The entire event was awesome!! After the event I said to one of the ladies who was there that "this was not an accident." She totally agreed with me!!

In summary: we exist because of God (per the creation scientists) or accidents (per the atheists and evolutionists). That is the evolution debate in one sentence!!! Pure accidents, as the creative force, is the only option for the atheists and evolutionists!!!

Let us bring up another of the many issues related to DNA. How could the alignment of male DNA and female DNA (even at the gene level) have "evolved" (via trial and error from species to new species) because if the alignment was not perfect the first time, in an attempt to create new DNA for a new species (both male and female) from the DNA of an old species (both male and female), there would never have been a viable baby to perpetuate a new species!!

We could call this the "first time" problem for atheists and evolutionists. It is a major problem!!!

But there is yet another major problem for evolution. The problem is creating a new and impoved species from an "old" or "existing" species. This would require new and improved DNA. There are massive technical problems and mathematical problems in any attempt to change one DNA strand (i.e. one computer program) into a "new and improved" DNA strand (i.e. a new and improved computer program).

We can see this with real computer programs. Can you randomly change the object code of one computer program and expect to end up with a new and improved computer program which has new features?? Obviously not!! Now try to change the object code on the far more sophisticated male and female computer programs (i.e. DNA)!!

DNA is like object code, but it is vastly more sophisticated than human-designed computer object code. Not only is it STATISTICALLY impossible to change the intelligence on a DNA strand, it is also PHYSICALLY impossible to change a DNA strand (you can only DAMAGE DNA, you cannot change it)!!!! More on that later.

It is the intelligence of God versus the intelligence of accidents. God will always win that battle!!


DNA Must Be Perfect

Think of the DNA for the several million species on this planet, as the most sophisticated computer programs on this planet. This is because the most sophisticated computer program ever written by human beings is less sophisticated than the DNA of a cockroach!! While a human designed computer program may be longer than a DNA strand, it is not more sophisticated.

In addition, if you had 99% of a complete DNA strand from the male and 97% of a complete DNA strand of the female (during the evolutionary process), this male and female could not have had any children!! Only 100% complete DNA from the male and 100% complete DNA from the female can align with each other and be able to create a viable child!!

DNA is "irreducibly complex," meaning every piece and sequence had to work the first time. For example, humans could not have "evolved" piecemeal from a prior species (e.g. a Bonobo), in addition to all of the other problems DNA causes for evolutionists.

But there is another factor that is involved in what we will look like when we are born. Before we were born we were a pure spirit in the "pre-existence." This spirit also affects what we look like when we are born. So what we look like when we are born is a combination of what our spirit looks like (and what our spirit looks like does not change over time) combined with one of the DNA strands of our father and one of the DNA strands of our mother. So what we look like is a combination of three things: our spirit and two DNA strands.

So ignoring the influence of our spirit, here is the key question: where did these three highly sophisticated DNA strands (two from the father and one from the mother) come from for thousands of animal species??

Anyone with a functional knowledge of permutations and statistics would immediately know that God is the creator of our spirit and He designed the DNA of our father and mother and thus God is behind what we look like and how we function!!!

In fact, the biggest problem in the evolution debate is that very few people have the mathematics background to understand the permutation issues relative to several million different species, many of which have both male and female DNA (more will be said about permutations below).


Could Human DNA Have Been Created And Intelligently Sequenced By Accidents?

Let's talk in more detail about creating a human baby. In order to create a human baby it takes three DNA strands plus three cells:
1) Male: Male DNA in a cell called the male sperm cell,
2) Male: Female DNA in a cell called the female sperm cell,
3) Female: Gender-neutral DNA in a cell called the ovum,
4) The male DNA in the male sperm cell must align with the gender-neutral female DNA
5) The female DNA in the female sperm cell must align with the gender-neutral female DNA

Only one DNA strand from a male sperm cell is used to create a baby, but for humanity to exist both male and female sperm cells are needed, so both lines 1 and 2 are required even though only one of them is normally used for a pregnancy (though 2 could be used for fraternal twins).

Plus the baby will hopefully grow up, via 3.2 billion cell divisions, to become an adult.

This incredible baby was created by the instructions on the DNA inside of a single fertilized egg, followed by 30 billion cell divisions which were controlled by the DNA which existed in the single fertilized egg and is inside of almost every subsequent cell!!!!!! No human can even begin to comprehend the information/computer programs that are built into human DNA!!

Human DNA is by far the most highly sophisticated computer program on this planet because it creates the most sophisticated animal on this earth: a body for a spirit child of God!! We are not children of accidents, we are children of God and God loves each of us.

Yet the atheists and evolutionists, who could not create the DNA of an ant, claim that human DNA was created and its nucleotides were ordered/sequenced purely by a series of accidents!! That is nonsense!!

I sometimes think that the leading atheists and evolutionists have never heard of DNA!! If they have, they certainly don't have a clue how DNA is constructed or the importance and sophistication of the sequence of nucleotides on every DNA strand.

In fact, as is demonstrated on this website in hundreds of different ways, the theory of evolution is complete scientific nonsense that only exists in the minds of those who want to convert people to their religion of atheism.

The bottom line is that because of the discovery of DNA, the sophistication of cells, the physical constants, etc. the theory of evolution has become complete, scientific nonsense.

Here is article with videos about the sophistication of cells - very interesting stuff:
Article: This Article Has Links To YouTube Videos Regarding The Sophistication Of Cells


Creation Science

"Creation Science" (a phrase many youth have never heard) is the claim that God lives and that all things, from the Big Bang to the DNA of an ant, had to be carefully planned, designed and executed by God or by others who were chosen and given authority by God. Yes, God designed and executed (or had someone else design and execute) the Big Bang. There may be countless Universes as space is infinite and has no bounds.

Let's talk a little about creation science. God is an intelligent force in nature - a very, very, very intelligent force!!!

My first college degree was in mathematics, so if I were asked to give my number one reason the theory of evolution cannot be true, I would reply with three words: "permutations of nucleotides." A "permutation" is a unique way of ordering a set of objects, in this case nucleotides. For example, the number of different ways that human male DNA could be sequenced (meaning the number of permutations) is 43,200,000,000!!!!

Only a very, very, very, very, very, very, very (insert the word "very" 100,000 more times) minute percent of these permutations would lead to a viable human being!!!

By comparison to the number of permutations of human DNA, the number of atoms in our Universe is probably less than 4500!!!!

It gets worse for accidents. For humans, there are actually three DNA strands which have 43,200,000,000 permutations - the DNA in the male sperm cells of the father, the DNA in the female sperm cells of the father and the gender-neutral DNA in the mother's ovum (i.e. egg).

And all three of these DNA strands (and this is true of all animals) must align with each other in an incomprehensible way!! So they not only have to be the same length, but subsections of the three DNA strands must align with each other!!! To say that this could happen by accident is purely insane!!!

When thinking about totally random sequences of nucleotides (if not intelligently sequenced and designed by God), the vast, vast, vast, vast majority of these would not yield a vaible human being or any other animal!!!

Consider that the DNA of EVERY ANIMAL on this planet is vastly more sophisticated than any computer program ever written by human beings!!!!! And every animal species has 3 DNA strands just like humans do!!!

In fact, if evolution were true, there would be trillions and trillions and trillions and trillions of dead animals (whose DNA was not quite good enough for survival and reproduction) and there still would not be a single living animal, not even a male mouse (much less a male mouse and female mouse). In order to create the several million species of plants, animals, etc. on this planet, (i.e. roughly twenty-one million different functional DNA strands) our entire Universe would be full of dead plants and animals and there still would not be a living pair of animals!!

Welcome to the vast, vast power of permutations!!!

It is actually worse than I just described. For example, suppose you were to create a single new DNA strand which sequentially and cumulative has the DNA from ALL SPECIES OF ANIMALS, WHICH HAVE TWO MALE AND ONE FEMALE DNA STRANDS, all species of plants, all species of insects, etc. on this planet!!! This DNA strand would have roughly one quadrillion nucleotides!!!!!

The permutations of this imaginary DNA strand would have 41,000,000,000,000,000 different ways of being sequenced!!!! Of course the vast, vast, vast (etc.) majority of these permutations would not create the several million species, male and female where applicable, on this planet.

Are you BEGINNING to grasp the sophistication of the massive numbers of unique DNA strands on this earth and the absurdity of claiming that accidents could have created any of them, much less all of them??

Let's talk more about the alignment of nucleotides issue.


Alignment of DNA Issues

Suppose you were given the task to write a massively complex computer program. But you were told to fulfill this assignment by doing the following:

Step 1) Using source code, write two MASSIVELY COMPLEX computer programs which are the same length after being compiled (i.e. the object code).
Step 2) Take the object code (i.e. the compiled code that the computer understands) of these two programs and align them together.
Step 3) Create a new computer program with this algorithm: for each bit, sequentially, use a random number generator to randomly select which of the two programs to pull the "bit" for that sequential bit.
Step 4) Then try to execute this new object code and see if you have created a new computer program (created by aligning the object code of the two original computer programs) which has features of both of the original programs.

Good luck. But that is precisely the way that nature creates the DNA for a baby from the DNA of its parents, except that there are three DNA strands.

Here is another fact: all of the scientists on this planet could not create a functional cell, with a functional DNA strand inside, from scratch (from raw elements on the Periodic Table)!! Also, this cell must be able to divide into two cells, each of which has a DNA strand. This means that during cell division, a copy of the DNA is made. Try to figure out how that is done.

But even if DNA strands could be created by humans, they could not intelligently sequence the nucleotides such that an animal could be created by millions or billions of cell divisions!!!

Here is a test of the integrity of those in the scientific community. If scientists claim that they can create two different DNA strands in a male (the DNA in the male sperm cell leads to a male baby and the DNA in the female sperm cell leads to a female baby) and the one DNA strand in a female (which is gender-neutral), then ask them to create the DNA and cells for an extinct species, such as the Woolly Mammoth or Dodo Bird!! I am sure they would volunteer to sit in jail until they finished the project!!

But there is another massive, massive issue. Scientists CANNOT CHANGE the DNA of one species, in thousands of different places, to create new DNA for a "new and improved" species!! This is the very foundation of the theory of evolution!!!!!!!!!!!

The entire foundation of the theory of evolution is the claim that one animal can "evolve" into a new and improved species!!!! But this means that the entire foundation of the theory of evolution is that the DNA of one species can be randomly changed into the DNA of a new species!!!

This claim is both physically and statistically impossible!!!!

Because this issue is the very foundation of the theory of evolution, after the discovery of DNA, I have an entire article which talks about whether DNA can be changed by a series of accidents OR BY HUMANS!!!
Article: DNA Cannot Be Changed


Common Ancestors

There are serious ramifications of the fact that DNA cannot be changed in other areas of the evolution debate!!!

For example, the concept of "common ancestor" is totally based on the belief that DNA can be changed!!! For example, it is thought by many that humans have a "common ancestor" with chimpanzees (AKA: "Chimpanzee - Human Last Common Ancestor" or CHLCA) because some segments of DNA of chimpanzees and humans are very similar.

To give you an idea of how dominant the atheists and evolutionists are on the Internet, when I put ["common ancestor of humans"] into Google I got 153,000 hits.

When I put in ["common designer" humans Chimpanzees] I got 2,060 hits on Google. This gives you an idea of how active the atheists and evolutionists are at pushing the theory of evolution or at least believing in evolution.

Thus, the reality is that humans and chimpanzees have a "common designer!!! When God designed the DNA for humans and chimpanzees He simply used DNA that he had already designed. I don't know whether He designed humans first or chimpanzees first. This method is common, for example, with those who design automobiles as they would occasionally use common parts from an old model car in the new model car. This saves money for the automobile manufacturer.

Or there could be other reasons God (or some of His children he assigned the task) used "common parts" on DNA.

The point is that the fact that DNA cannot be changed is VERY IMPORTANT when thinking about the claims of the atheists and evolutionists. This is just an example of how the atheists and evolutionists assume evolution is true.


A Little About Cells

Many scientists have PhD degrees in "Cell Biology"!! Cells are not simple!! So how could a PhD in Cell Biology think for one instant that cells, and what goes on inside of cells, was created purely by accidents!!!

This is what bothers me: why do "scientists" (as they call themselves) assume, for one instant, that the DNA of an ant could be created and intelligently sequenced by nothing but accidents?? Do these people ever think for themselves??

Actually "no." What these people think about is recognition and popularity. On this planet, "truth" is about number 1,000 on their priority list (i.e. at the bottom of their priorities). Popularity, money and other things are in the top ten!!!

Nobody has the guts to rock the boat. I am a retired cancer researcher so I couldn't care less about being popular.

Here is the bottom line: the scientific evidence is overwhelming that accidents have not created a single cell or a single DNA strand!! Nor have accidents intelligently sequenced the nucleotides on any DNA strand!! The entire foundation of the theory of evolution is scientific nonsense!!

Trust me: God is alive and well and He is a heck of a lot smarter than any of us!!

But let me say one more key thing before moving on. God knew that the theory of evolution was coming in 1859 when Darwin's first book was published. In fact, the Book of Mormon, published in 1830 (29 years before Darwin's first book), predicted the coming forth of the theory of evolution in three different places!!

But I should also mention that there was a world famous scientist, who was a contemporary of Charles Darwin, who did not in any degree agree with Charles Darwin!!! His name was Louis Agassiz (1807-1873). Here is an article about him:
Article: Louis Agassiz - The Contemporary of Darwin Who Denounced The Theory of Evolution

In fact, this website reveals more than 400 reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true!!! And that happens to be in just one article. There are dozens of other articles.

So we are done with the introduction.


Can New DNA Be Created From Scratch??

There are two categories if someone claimed that "evolution" (i.e. accidents) created a new species. First, the claim that new species (i.e. their DNA) are created from scratch, with their own new DNA, or second, the claim that new species, with new DNA, have DNA which was created by a modification to the DNA of a previously existing species.

In this section, let's talk about the creation of new DNA from scratch.

In order for "evolution" (i.e. "accidents") to create a new species, with brand new DNA, the new species must be created by nothing but accidents, with no intelligence whatsoever involved. Is this logical? Absolutely not!!

Since all animal species begin as a single fertilized egg, with DNA inside of the egg which controls cell divisions, evolution has no choice except to work at the DNA level!!! It is DNA that creates an animal, not the other way around!!

All of the scientists in the world, combined, could not create a new DNA strand from scratch, but even if they could they would have absolutely no ability to order/intelligently sequence the nucleotides on the new DNA!!

If evolution were true, and accidents could create massively sophisticated computer programs (like DNA), we could fire all computer programmers and use random number generators to simulate evolution in order to write new computer programs and to enhance old computer programs into new and improved computer programs which have new features!!

This is absurd as any computer programmer knows, yet this is precisely the claim of the atheists and evolutionists!!! Evolution is essentially a random number generator applied to millions of unique DNA strands for several million unique species, many of which have both male and female DNA which must align in an incredibly sophisticated way!!

And the DNA of each and every animal, plant and insect on this planet is massively most sophisticated than any human-designed computer program on this planet!!!


Can New And Improved DNA (For a New and Improved Species) Be Created By Modifications To Old DNA?? (Very, Very Important)

Here is the another major issue: can new and improved DNA be created from old DNA, meaning from previously existing DNA?

THIS IS THE HEART AND SOUL OF THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION as evolution claims new and improved species were created from less sophisticated species by evolution!!!

This means that evolution claims that the DNA of one species can be randomly modified to create new and improved DNA!! Let me say that again in a different way:

THE ENTIRE FOUNDATION OF THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION IS THAT THE DNA OF ONE SPECIES CAN BE CHANGED INTO THE DNA OF A NEW AND IMPROVED SPECIES!!!

But this is impossible because of the structure of a DNA strand!!

Unlike the fact that computer programmers can make changes to the source code of a computer program, evolution cannot make changes to a DNA strand!! DNA can be created, but it cannot be changed because of the way that DNA is constructed.

For example, if you break the rails on a DNA strand, the rails cannot be put back together!!! There are actually several reasons the rails cannot be put back together when the DNA is inside of a cell.

What some people call "rails" are frequently called the "sugar-phosphate backbone" of a DNA strand.

DNA cannot be changed - period!!! DNA can only be damaged. So the DNA of one animal cannot physically be changed into the DNA of another animal!! The claim that the DNA of one animal evolved into the DNA of another animal is pure fantasy and indicates a complete failure of the atheists and evolutionists to understand the complex physical structure of DNA!!!

Ask a biologist if they have ever created a DNA strand from scratch, even for an ant, meaning from purely raw elements on the Periodic Table??

And also ask a biologist if they have ever modified an existing DNA strand so that an existing species becomes a superior species which can have offspring and has new and improved features!!

If the person is honest, the answer will be 'no' for three reasons: First, DNA cannot be created from scratch either by humans or accidents, and Second, DNA cannot be modified, it can only be damaged. Third, DNA is so sophisticated that even if scientists could modify DNA (which they can't), they would have no clue how to change the sequence of nucleotides on the DNA strand.

Scientists cannot even cut a DNA strand in half (like you would cut a rope in half) and then put the DNA strand back together.

Not only can DNA not be physically changed, even if it could be changed, it would be ludicrous to claim that one massively complex computer program (i.e. the DNA of an animal) could be RANDOMLY CHANGED into a superior computer program (i.e. superior DNA which can create a new and proved species).

But it gets worse. In order to change the DNA of one species into the DNA of another species, many thousands of changes to the DNA would be needed!! To think that accidents could do the impossible - change the DNA strand once, much less many thousands of times to create a single new species - is absurd beyond comprehension.

And to claim that this happened to create hundreds of thousands of species, many with a male and female, is even more absurd. If a male and female are involved, the DNA of the male and the DNA of the female would have to have the same changes made in the same timeframe and same latitude and longitude.

Evolution does not have any intelligence plus it does not have any physical abilities to do anything to create and intelligently sequence a new DNA strand and it does not have the intelligence or ability to make viable changes to an existing DNA strand in order to make a new and improved DNA strand for a new and improved species!!

Remember, evolution is the dumbest thing in the Universe, evolution cannot even hope that the results of pure, unintended accidents to DNA are favorable (which they NEVER will be).

So how are new species created by evolution?? They aren't, that is my point!!! The theory of evolution is nothing but the fancy imaginations of the atheists and evolutionists who are trying to get converts to atheism!!

Literally, the atheists and evolutionists give "evolution" more intelligence than the intelligence of any team of human beings because all of the scientists on this planet could not design and build new DNA for a new species or design and build new DNA (to create a new species) by modifying the DNA of an existing species!!!!

If humans cannot do it, then accidents certainly cannot do it (if you know anything about cells and DNA) and it is both mathematically and physically insane to think otherwise (if you know anything about the mathematics of permutations in base 4). There is an article on permutations linked to below.

There are several million species of plants, animals and insects on this planet and each has DNA which is more sophisticated than any computer program ever written by any team of human beings!!

In fact, all of the scientists in the world do not understand the DNA of an ant or the DNA of a cockroach!! And all of the scientists in the world, combined, only understand about 2% of human DNA!!

Human DNA is by far the most sophisticated computer program on earth though it is not the longest DNA strand. Only the DNA of other species can compete with human DNA for sophistication!!

Remember, the several million most sophisticated computer programs on this planet are the several million DNA strands for the several million species on this planet!! And remember that many species have both a male and female which require three DNA strands.

No human computer program can slip into that list of the world's most sophisticated computer programs (i.e. DNA)!!

Here is an article which has basically the same information but has a different focus:
Article: Changing The Length Of A DNA Strand


More On The Male and Female Issues Related To Creating New DNA From Old DNA??

As a specific example of the claim that new DNA can be created from old/existing DNA, let us assume that evolutionists claimed that human DNA "evolved" directly from the DNA of Bonobos. What their actual claims are is not relevant to this discussion, the issue is whether the DNA of one species (e.g. Bonobos) can be MODIFIED to create the DNA for a slightly superior species or a massively superior species.

We will not cover the situation where a species which does not have a male and female can "evolve" into a species which has both a male and female (which is itself a major issue with evolution), rather we will discuss the "evolution" of a species with both a male and female into a superior species which has both a male and female.

In order for evolution (i.e. accidents) to create the DNA for a new species, by randomly modifying the DNA of an existing species (which has both a male and female), the accidental changes to the (old) male DNA and the (old) female DNA (as required by the theory of evolution) must be in the same sections of their DNA and the changes must happen in the same generation!!

All of the changes to the DNA do not have to occur in the same generation, but each SUBSET of changes must occur in the same locations and same generation. For example, there could be 50 changes to the male and female in each of 10 consecutive generations (for a total of 500 changes to the male and female). But each subset of 50 changes in each generation must include the same 50 changes.

As an example, the same new genes (male and female) must be in the same sections of their respective DNA so that their offspring (the new species) will have the new section(s) of their DNA from both their mother and father!! This is part of the alignment issues required by evolution.

But not only must the genes and other sections of DNA align between the male and female (as evolution is making changes to the DNA of both the male and female at the same time so the male DNA and female DNA will align with each other at all times), the morphing of the embryo algorithms sections on the DNA of the male and female (Note: this is my terminology for the sections of DNA which control the cell divisions of the baby) must also align because it is the morphing of the embryo algorithms that control the 30 billion cell divisions (in the case of humans) as the new baby is being made!!

By using the term "align" I do not mean that they have the same nucleotides. What I mean is that the FUNCTION of each section must align. For example, the sections of the DNA that contain the gene(s) for eye color, for a male and female, must align, but the eye color of the male and the eye color of the female do not have to be the same.

The alignment of the morphing of the embryo algorithms alone represents an issue so devastating to the theory of evolution that it would destroy the theory of evolution by itself!! For example, with human DNA, and the DNA of many other species, there are two gigantic computer programs (male DNA and female DNA) which are each massively more sophisticated than any human-designed computer program!!! How do these two computer programs align before, during and after the transition from an "old" species to a "new and improved" species??

To make a human baby, these two biological computer programs on two DNA strands (male and female) must align with each other so their offspring have features of both parents. Try doing that with the object code of two different computer programs!!

There is no way that the morphing of the embryo algorithms, on the father's DNA and the mother's DNA, would align with each other after a massive series of accidents (i.e. as "evolution" is trying to improve the DNA to make a new species)!! In addition, these changes must occur in the same timeframe and same location on this earth or the male and female would not find each other as the massive number of accidents (i.e. evolution) were happening.


The "Path" To Human DNA (The Death of the Theory of Evolution)

Let us suppose that from the "first living cell" to human DNA there were 1,000 consecutive intermediate species. Remember, we are only looking at the path of species sequentially between the first living cell and human DNA according to the atheists and evolutionists. All other species are ignored in this section.

The number 1,000 is credible because the length of human DNA is massively longer than the DNA of any theoretical "first living cell."

We will call this sequence of species the "path" concept, meaning the path of microbes and animals between the first living cell and human DNA. In other words, if we saw pictures of every species, sequentially, between the "first living cell" and human DNA, this would be the "path."

As just discussed, DNA cannot be modified, it can only be damaged, and when it is damaged it is useless. The "path" concept is ridiculous when considering that DNA cannot be changed, it can only be damaged. In other words, the path concept is impossible because DNA cannot be modified. Yet, if evolution were true there must be a "path" of species from the "first living cell" to human DNA!!!


Comparing DNA to Computer Programs

The evolution debate made a dramatic change when DNA was discovered in 1953!! Scientists now had to explain how DNA came to exist by a series of accidents!!

Today it is obvious that a single fertilized egg contains the instructions to create a baby animal, even humans, via millions or billions of cell divisions!! However, scientists don't have the SLIGHEST CLUE how DNA can create a new baby via millions or billions of cell divisions!!!

We can compare human DNA to a computer program, though human DNA is vastly more sophisticated than any computer program ever written by humans.

If evolution were true, computer programmers would not be needed because random number generators (i.e. evolution or accidents) could create the source code or object code for every new computer program on earth!!

Furthermore, to create a new and improved computer program from an existing computer program; all you would need to do is apply a random number generator to the source code or object code of the old computer program. This process should work every time if evolution is true because there is no evidence of failures of the "accidents" of evolution!!

But random number generators could NEVER create the source code or object code for a new computer program, nor could random number generators modify the souce code or object code of an existing viable computer program and create a new computer program with new features!!

Any computer programmer who was told to write new source code or object code for a new computer program (or to improve an existing computer program) with random number generators, would just laugh at the idea. Yet this same computer programmer may believe in the theory of evolution because he/she does not understand what DNA does.

It is now known that human DNA is like the "object code" of a massively complex computer program. But there is no "source code" and there is no compiler.

To demonstrate this with bar charts, see one of the chapters in one of the free eBooks on this website. This chapter is a series of bar graphs which prove, beyond any doubt, that accidents cannot create a viable DNA strand. And these bar charts do not even discuss the physical construction of DNA!! Click:
Book: Patterns of Intelligence - Chapter 18 - (Study All Bar Charts!!)

The term "evolution" in the time of Charles Darwin and the term "evolution" today mean totally different things because Darwin knew almost nothing about cells and he knew nothing about DNA!!! Darwin only saw the visual form of animals.

Can the atheists and evolutionists explain how accidents created the DNA for several million species by a series of pure, undirected accidents?? Absolutely Not!!


What Computer Programming Can Teach Us About Evolution

We have already talked about the problems with creating a new species from an old species by mentioning that existing DNA cannot be modified. But there are other reasons a new species cannot be created from an old species even if DNA could be modified.

Let us compare the claim that a new species can be created from an old species to the computer language C#.

When writing or changing a computer program in C# there are three steps:
Step #1) Have a computer programmer, trained in C#, change existing "source code" or write new "source code." Source code is what the computer programmer understands,
Step #2) "Compile" the source code. The "compiler" is a computer program which converts the source code into binary code that the computer understands,
Step #3) The "binary code," created by the compiler, is executed by the computer.

Now suppose that a perfectly good C# computer program needed a major upgrade to add a new feature to the program. There are two options to make the changes:
Option #1) Have the computer programmer make the necessary changes and additions to the source code and then recompile the program, or
Option #2) Randomly mutate (meaning randomly delete, add and change bits) the object code of the original program and hope that the new object code of the program has all of the old features of the old program plus it has all of the desired new features.

No computer programmer on this planet would choose the second option!! It would be a waste of time and would totally destroy the old program and it would not have any new or old features that worked!!!

Yet Option #2 is precisely the way that evolution must work!!! There is no "source code" for DNA, there is only "object code" on the DNA. Evolution can only RANDOMLY change the DNA via random mutations!! Yet the atheists and evolutionists claim that the DNA of a perfectly good species can be randomly mutated (by evolution) and the random mutations will create a new and improved species EVERY TIME!!!

This is nonsense because DNA includes computer programs vastly more sophisticated than any computer program ever written by any team of human beings!!! And the DNA only contains the object code!!

With the discovery of DNA the evolution debate should have left the domain of biologists and been put under the domain of statisticians looking at DNA. But that will never happen because there are many atheists who need the theory of evolution to sell their books and get new converts to atheism!!

In addition to things on this earth, scientists also cannot create a single sun from scratch. And is it logical to think that our sun and all of the stars (e.g. the supergiant star VY Canis Majoris), galaxies, superclusters of galaxies, etc. in the Universe came to exist by an accidental explosion called the Big Bang?

It is absurd to claim that accidents created all DNA, all cells, all stars, all galaxies, etc. But these claims will never go away because the atheists and evolutionists will always be looking for converts. But the truth is that the claims of the atheists are complete scientific nonsense.

The prophets, past and present, are absolutely correct: God is the source of all DNA, cells, galaxies, etc.


Why Humans Did Not Evolve From Monkeys

This article combines some of the information in other articles to specifically explain, in one place, why humans, male and female, did not "evolve" from any other primate, such as monkeys, Bonobos or gorillas. In other words, while this article talks about humans evolving from monkeys, its concepts apply no matter what animal a person may think that humans "evolved" from:
Article: Why Humans Did Not Evolve From Monkeys (Or Any Other Primate)


Kehr's Paradox #1 and Kehr's Paradox #2

My first college degree from Brigham Young University was in mathematics, so I have a tendency to look at evolution from the perspective of mathematics, especially relative to DNA. Kehr's Paradoxes (yours truly) are mathematical reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true.

The atheists and evolutionists claim that the DNA of an existing species can be modified into the DNA of a new and improved species. In fact, this is the very core of the theory of evolution after the discovery of DNA. Let us ignore the fact that DNA cannot be changed and ponder their claim by assuming that the changes to DNA are made one nucleotide at a time.

Kehr's Paradox #1: If an existing DNA strand is modified enough times, in random locations and with random nucleotides chosen each time, eventually 25% of the nucleotides will be an 'A' and 25% of the nucleotides will be a 'C' and 25% of the nucleotides will be a 'G' and 25% of the nucleotides will be a 'T' and no animal will be created.

However, we have already see than human DNA does not have an equal number of 'A' and 'C' and 'G' and 'T' nucleotides:
Book: Patterns of Intelligence - Chapter 18 - (Study All Bar Charts!!)

Kehr's Paradox #2: If an existing DNA strand is modified enough times, in random locations and with random nucleotides chosen each time, eventually 25% of the nucleotides will be correct nucleotides (to create a predefined specific target DNA strand, such as for a male mouse) and 75% of all nucleotides will be the wrong nucleotide and no animal will be created.

Computer simulations would be the best way to check-out this second paradox.

See this article for more information:
Article: Kehr's Paradox


Natural Selection

This subject has already been discussed above, so this section will be short and link to an article.

One problem with natural selection is that because of the discovery of DNA, it is impossible for any species to exist!! So there should not be any species to select from!!

Well, natural selection is true, but this article will go into great detail about why Natural Selection has absolutely nothing to do with evolution:
Article: Does "Natural Selection" Have Anything To Do With The Theory of Evolution?


Measuring The Damage Of The Theory of Evolution

While the theory of evolution versus creation science debate is heated, the debate is far more than academic because many students are victims of this battle!! As a result of the teaching of evolution in many schools, countless middle school, high school and college students have lost their belief in God or they may question their belief in God.

Fortunately, the damage done by evolution can be measured. Studies funded by the very well known evangelical creationist Ken Ham group have shown that most of the loss of testimony of God occurs in middle school and high school, not in college!! Ken Ham's conclusion, based on statistics, is that students are already gone by the time they get to college!!

But of course, those who still have a testimonly of God when they enter college will have that testimony challenged in college depending on what courses they take.

I should also note that the evangelicals do not have the Pearl of Great Price of the Mormon church. Many things in the early chapters of Genesis were damaged over the many centuries between when it was written and today. The Pearl of Great Price exists largely to "fix" the damage done to the early chapters of Genesis.

Here is a link to the Ken Ham video: "Already Gone - Part 1"
YouTube Video: Already Gone


Detailed Articles On Specific Topics


Where Did God Come From??

If "evolution" cannot be true (for hundreds of reasons), then God must live. So it is common for someone to ask: "Where did God come from?" There is an article to answer that question. Most of this article uses quotes from the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints - the Mormons - and includes quotes on the nature of God:
Article: Where Did God Come From?


A Warning By God To Those Who Teach/Endorse/Force The Theory of Evolution On Students

It is unfortunate that in many school districts in the United States, and outside of the United States, the theory of evolution is taught (e.g. in biology classes) as if it were a proven scientific fact. Not only is the theory of evolution not proven, the theory of evolution is scientific nonsense as this website demonstrates over and over!! Yet many teachers endorse the claims for the theory of evolution in their classes!!

Because of the teaching of the doctrines of evolution in the classrooms countless youth, starting in middle school and continuing in high school and college, no longer believe in God and may no longer go to church (mentally and/or physically)!! The evolution debate is not an academic exercise to entertain people, it is a debate for the souls of men and women, boys and girls!!!!

The Book of Mormon, published in 1830, has THREE WANINGS for those who damage the testimonies in God of the children of God (e.g. the youth!!!)

Remember the Book of Mormon was published 29 years before Darwin's first book!!

This article is for judges (even Federal and State Supreme Court judges), school board members, principals, teachers, etc. who are responsible for the teaching of the theory of evoultion:
Article: A Warning By God To Those Who Teach/Endorse/Force The Theory of Evolution To Students!!!

While this next article does not directly "deal with" teachers and professors, the warning to people like Richard Dawkins should give even teachers and professors cause to wonder whether they should be teaching their students that there is no God. The warnings come from the Book of Mormon, which was published 29 YEARS before Darwin's First Book:
Article: The First Book To Describe the Theory of Evolution Was NOT Written By Charles Darwin!!!


The First Book To Describe Evolution Was NOT Written By Darwin!!!

The Book of Mormon (considered "scripture" by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints or Mormon church) was published in 1830, which was 29 years before Darwin's first book; yet the Book of Mormon predicted the coming forth of the theory of evolution in three different places. So God was well aware that the theory of evolution was coming, even in 1830!!

See this article:
Article: The First Book To Describe the Theory of Evolution was NOT Written By Charles Darwin

This article is a special article for Latter-Day Saints (i.e. Mormons), though obviously anyone is welcome to read it.

Article: Additional Section For Latter-Day Saints


Join The Fight: Please Share This Website With Others!!

Please share this amazing website with 15 or 20 of your friends on social media (e.g. Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, Pinterest, etc.) and ask your friends to share this site with 15 or 20 of their friends on social media!! Also, please link to this website from your website!! JOIN THE FIGHT!!!!!

Until a few dozen people do these things this website might as well be classified as military-grade Top Secret because Google will rank this website very, very low on the totem pole!!

My biography and email address are at the very bottom of this page.

A Brief Introduction To Cells

DNA resides inside of cells. In fact, the DNA is critical for the cell.

Hundreds of scientists have PhD degrees in cell biology so cells are not simple!!

Here is a quote by Michael Denton about cells:

  • "We now know that there are in fact tens of thousands of irreducibly complex systems on the cellular level. Specified complexity pervades the microscopic biological world. Molecular biologist Michael Denton wrote, "Although the tiniest bacterial cells are incredibly small, weighing less than 10-12 grams, each is in effect a veritable micro-miniaturized factory containing thousands of exquisitely designed pieces of intricate molecular machinery, made up altogether of one hundred thousand million atoms, far more complicated than any machinery built by man and absolutely without parallel in the non-living world."
    http://www.darwins-theory-of-evolution.com/

An "irreducibly complex system," is by definition, a sequence of complex chemical reactions, such that if any one of the chemical reactions was not there, or failed, the end result of the chemical reaction will fail and the entire cell may be at risk!!!

I would assume that most of these chemical reactions are used to create ATP molecules in the cell. ATP is a key molecule inside every cell. In fact, when something blocks ATP energy, and the cell has low ATP energy, the cell is DEFINED to be cancerous!!

Michael Denton did not say there was one such sequence of chemical chain reactions in cells, but "tens of thousands" of such systems!!!

This is significant because it is one of the many reasons that "evolution" cannot create a cell from scratch!! In other words, all of the chemical chain reactions must be functional at the time the cell is first created because if one or more systems of chemical chain reactions is not there from the beginning, the new cell may not survive!!! Accidents could never create a living cell by accidents!!

In other words, an irreducibly complex chemical chain reaction cannot "evolve" into existence by adding one chemical reaction at a time because each and every chemical chain reaction must be fully functional before the chemical reaction can achieve any benefit to the cell!!"


The Magnitude Of The Problems With The Theory Of Evolution

The above items, and more to come, are just a few of the hundreds of scientific reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true which are discussed on this website.

But I should emphasize that the MAGNITUDE of the reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true is simply beyond comprehension. The permutation issues of the DNA for several million species, many with both a male and female, alone would eliminate any chance that the theory of evolution is true. And the construction of DNA is another issue of such magnitude that the theory of evolution simply cannot be true.

Do not look at each reason the theory of evolution cannot be true as being equal with the other reasons. Some reasons are massive enough, by themselves, to make the theory of evolution completely ludicrous!!!

Now I want to make it very clear that many students have been fooled by the atheists and evolutionists. This is nothing to be ashamed of. The atheists have perfected the art of deception, they are well-organized, very well-funded and their deceptions are highly polished!!!

Atheists don't want a God to exist because a God would be massively smarter than they are. So most of them do everything in their vivid imaginations to pretend there is no God and to claim that everything in the Universe came to exist by pure chance. God is replaced by mindless accidents.


What Should A Student Do??

So what should a student do when they realize the theory of evolution is complete scientific nonsense (and I am just beginning)? It is definitely not advisable for a student to argue with their teacher, but there is nothing wrong with a student quietly going "online" and learning the truth about the absurdity of the theory of evolution because of the sophistication of DNA and the sophistication of the cells that the DNA resides inside of, among many other reasons (e.g. the physical constants and the Universe).

This website shows no mercy for the theory of evolution. Why should it? The theory of evolution is pure science fiction!! In fact, this website discusses hundreds of reasons that the theory of evolution cannot be true, meaning hundreds of reasons that accidents could not have created everything in the Universe, including what is on this earth that is not man-made!!

I can assure you that God is not pleased with people who teach that He does not exist!!! God loves His children (that includes you and me). But as our Father, God wants His children to know the truth. And just as importantly, God is a very forgiving God.


Evolution After The "First Living Cell"

Life on this earth had to start with a single cell. So let us first talk about the credibility of the "first living cell" theory as claimed by the atheists and evolutionists:
Article: First Living Cell

Evolutionists claim that the DNA of the first human male and the DNA of the first human female "evolved" independently over millions of years, from the same "first living cell," by a series of accidents called "evolution"!!!

How did the DNA of the first human father and the DNA of the first human mother "evolve" together from the "first living cell?" How was their DNA synchronized, species after slightly improved species, as the DNA of the males and females evolved independently for millions of years??

Here is the problem, suppose the male DNA evolved slightly faster than the female DNA evolved. Within many thousands of years of new species, their DNA would not align and they would not have been able to have any children that survived because their DNA was not compatible!!

Male DNA and female DNA had to be designed by God, for each species with a male and female!!. Evolution could never have designed two massively sophisticated computer programs (DNA) that could be integrated together to create a third computer program (a baby). And evolution certainly could not have done it in the same time-frame and same locations on the earth.

Yet the atheists claim that evolution created male and female DNA for many species that have both a male and female. They must claim the male and female DNA "evolved" over the same time period (so they could mate as they slowly evolved over many generations) and they had to live in the same geographical area (also required so they could mate).

But the truth is that it does not matter what is discovered in cell biology, DNA analysis, etc. because no matter what is discovered, the atheists will either ignore it or give evolution the credit!!

The evolution debate is not about science, it is about God. If you assume God does not exist, or if you believe God does not exist, you will likely believe in the theory of evolution no matter how absurd it is.

Unfortunately, many people who believed in God have been tricked into believing in evolution. In fact, that is the precise purpose of the highly sophisticated deceptions of the atheists and evolutionists (and I have only talked about a few of their deceptions) and why it is taught in most schools, but not all schools. In some schools, "creation science" or "intelligent design" is taught and in other schools there are disclaimers about evolution.

Biology is no longer about science, it is about creative thinking as to how every discovery can be attributed to the theory of evolution in order to get more converts to atheism. Atheists are not interested in truth, they are only interested in getting converts to atheism.

One of the key deceptions of the atheists and evolutionists, to get converts, is their definition of the term "species." They define the term "species" in such a way that each "variety" of dog is a different "species." To them a Chihuahua and a Great Dane are different "species." This gives them the latitude to claim that they have observed a new "species" form. But if the term "unique species" is defined to be a "unique DNA structure" then they have never seen a new "species" be created. Nor will they ever see a new species be created by accident or by human breeding of animals.

The atheists and evolutionists don't like to talk about DNA, they like to tell stories and use deception, such as by using very clever deceptive definitions.

Seven chapters in one of the free eBooks on this website are devoted to deceptive definitions.

In addition, the atheists must claim the entire Universe was created by accident!! How could the atheists and evolutionists claim that the entire Universe was created by accident instead of by God? Well, they had to come up with some "accident" that they claimed could create the Universe, including the superclusters of clusters of galaxies. So the atheists invented the concept of a purely accidental "Big Bang." They want you to believe that an accidental explosion (remember, it had to be an accident) created the Universe. I don't think so.

It gets worse. What about the incredible "physical constants." Some of the 300+ physical constants have to be unbelievably accurate or our Universe could not exist!! How did the atheists deal with that impossible subject??

To explain how the physical constants came to exist by accident, one of the most famous atheists came up with the concept of "multiverse," and claimed that there were an infinite number of Universes (i.e. an infinite number of Big Bangs), but all of them failed to create a viable Universe because they did not have the right combination of physical constants. Well, all of them failed except ours, which just happened to have the right combination of physical constants.

You have to admire the atheists and evolutionists for their creative thinking!! But creative story-telling, and hundreds of PhDs, does not imply truth. In fact, it doesn't matter what is discovered, the vivid imaginations of the atheists and evolutionists can generate a story for every scientific fact!!


The Current Evolution Versus Creation Science Debate

The evolution debate should not be based on the visual forms of plants and animals (i.e. Darwin's phylogenetic tree), but rather it should be based on the probability that the DNA of the plants and animals (and the cells the DNA resides in) came to exist PURELY BY CHANCE (i.e. by the totally random accidents of evolution)!!

But what massively sophisticated computer program, and human DNA is the most sophisticated computer program on this planet, has ever come to exist by a long series of pure accidents?

Every DNA strand is claimed to have been created by accident and every computer program has been written by computer programmers (and the compilers were written by humans and the operating systems were written by humans), yet EVERY DNA strand is far more sophisticated than EVERY computer program!!

Suppose you were a spy and you were told by your country to steal the instructions of how to manufacture a certain kind of automobile. Would you take a photograph of the automobile or would you steal the schematics of the machines in the factory that made the automobile?? Obviously you would steal the schematics of the machines.

Likewise, debating the theory of evolution by looking at the visual forms of plants and animals is not scientific because it totally misses the root cause of why the plants and animals exist, which is DNA!!

The fact is that without DNA there would be no plants and no animals.

To be more specific, plants and animals are created by the computer algorithms which are on the DNA of the plants and animals. So looking at the visual form of a plant and animal is NOT looking at what causes the plant or animal to exist!!

Needless to say the atheists and evolutionists don't like to talk about DNA or cells, they like to talk about the visual form of each plant and animal so they can tell their stories. They carefully ignore the fact that computer programs in the human world are never written by random number generators, but evolution itself is essentially a random number generator applied to DNA!! Without God there is nothing but total randomness in nature.

The key question in the evolution debate is this: knowing that the "computer programs" on DNA in nature are vastly more sophisticated than any "human-designed computer program," how could the "computer programs" on DNA, for several million species have been "written" by totally random processes?

As will be seen many times on this website, when DNA is looked at during the evolution debate, the theory of evolution becomes scientific nonsense. By definition, there is "no intelligence" in the theory of evolution, especially at the DNA level.

The only "evidence" the evolutionists have for their theory is to ignore DNA and look only at the visual form of plants and animals and then combine the visual form of plants and animals with their exceptional story-telling skills.

Once DNA enters into the evolution debate the theory of evolution quickly collapses because all DNA is a massively sophisticated computer program, even for an ant.


Cell Biology (The Sophistication of Cells)

Suppose you were on a hike deep in the forest and you had not seen any sign of civilization for several hours. Suppose as you came over one hill you saw, what looked like to you, a brand new Buick automobile with its engine running and its headlights on and its hazard lights flashing.

Would you think that this "object" was created by an explosion in a forest?? Of course not. A forest is made of dirt, trees, shrubs, rocks, etc. You would know that what you were looking at was vastly too sophisticated to have been created by an explosion in the forest.

Yet, every cell in your body is massively more sophisticated than any automobile ever made!! To say that any cell was created by a series of accidents is ludicrous. Yet all plants, animals and insects are made from a collection of cells and each of those cells is more sophisticated than a Buick!!

In fact, all of the scientists on this planet could not create a single cell, even without the DNA that is inside of almost all cells. Nor could they create the many other things which are inside the cell that are part of the continuous activities going on inside of almost every cell. Nor could they figure out how to make a cell divide into two cells, including copying the Golgi Apparatus, for example.

Hundreds of scientists have PhD degrees in Cell Biology, so cells are not simple!! The large textbook Essential Cell Biology, Third Edition, has 8 authors and 730 pages plus many pages of other information!! The Glossary has 596 definitions!!! Cells are clearly not simple!!

By the way, the term "species" was not even defined in the book!! The term should be defined thusly: "a unique species is determined by a unique DNA structure." But if the atheists and evolutionists used this definition, the theory of evolution would crumble to the ground. This is precisely what so many atheists tap dance around a definition of "species."

Another textbook on Cell Biology is called: The World Of The Cell, Fourth Edition, by Becker, Kleinsmith and Hardin. This textbook is 845 pages. The term "species" does not show up in the Index.

There are clearly at least 100 reasons the theory of accidents cannot be true due to the sophistication of cells; and this does not include the many issues created purely by the DNA in almost all cells!! In fact, I own two books on this very issue (and I am sure there are other books on this topic):
Signature In The Cell - DNA and the Evidence For Intelligent Design by Stephen C. Meyer
The Cell's Design - How Chemistry Reveals The Creator's Artistry by Fazale Rana

These two men are obviously "creation scientists," meaning they believe that God had to create the many species on this earth because they could not have been created by accidents.


What is Life?

Let us look at the issue: "what is life?" For example, if you took a fish and left it out of the water until it died, and then an hour later you put it back into the water, why doesn't it come back to life? All of the raw elements for life are still in the fish, so why doesn't it come back to life? There is something more to "life" than just cells and oxygen and water.

Furthermore, have the evolutionists and atheists ever proven that life can be created from non-life (i.e. inorganic materials)?? Never, never, never - yet they continue to preach atheism.

While several attempts have been made to create life from non-life (e.g. Miller-Uray, Wong and Hartgerink), the scientists have not only failed to create life, they have also failed to prove it can be done. They cannot create a DNA strand from inorganic material, much less a DNA strand with a viable permutation of nucleotides for life which is inside of a cell!!

For example, have scientists put a large shell over a pond, which had no life, meaning there was no DNA and no cells (this simulates "prebiotic," meaning "existing before life"), and observed "life" form by a series of accidents, including RNA or DNA inside of a "first living cell" (in that pond), that was alive and had the ability to divide itself into two cells (which would be required for life to continue)?

Never!!

Then what is their evidence for evolution? Their only evidence is that many scientists do not believe in God and thus they have no choice except to use their God-given brains to deceive people into believing that everything in the Universe, including human DNA, occurred by chance.

But the theory of evolution should have been thrown in the trash can when DNA was discovered and when the complexity of cells was also discovered. Yet, as scientists learn more and more about DNA and cells, the atheists continue to cling to the theory of evolution as if it were still 1859, when Darwin's first book was published.

The only thing that is "evolving" on this planet is the theory of evolution as evolutionists/atheists constantly need to develop new spin to account for the new discoveries about the sophistication of cells, the morphing of the embryo algorithms on DNA, etc.


Can Accidents Or Simplicity Create Complexity?

As one example of complexity, the human eyes are unbelievable in complexity. Yet the sections on human DNA which create the human eyes must be far more complex than the eyes themselves!! And the intelligence who designed the DNA (God) must be far more complex than the DNA itself!!

In other words, simplicity never creates complexity. To understand these concepts, consider these items:

First, consider that a human-designed computer program exists because of the human intelligence to write the computer program, the human intelligence to write the computer language, the human intelligence to write the computer language compiler, the human intelligence to design and build the microprocessor, including designing and building the memory chips, etc.

Second, consider the output of the computer program which is printed on a piece of paper.

How can the printout on the piece of paper be more sophisticated than the human intelligence needed to write the computer program, to write the computer language, etc.?? It can't!!

Let's think about the memory chips. I have a son who works for a company that makes memory chips. At times he is sitting in a very large room by himself, with several billion dollars worth of equipment needed to make memory chips!!

The memory chips cannot be more complex than the machines that made them, and the machines that made them cannot be more complex than the humans who designed them!!

Simplicity cannot create complexity!!

Consider the sophistication of DNA such that it creates a person's brain. Let us think about a pianist.

A pianist must be able to convert thousands on dots on a sheet of music into the movements of their fingers!! To do this the DNA must create the nerves between their eyes and their brain, have the brain process these dots and then the brain controls their fingers. And the DNA must create the muscles on their fingers, etc.

If all of this is in place, and with thousands of hours of practice, a pianist can play the Rachmaninoff Piano Concerto #3!!

What created our DNA, which in turn created our brain, had to be far, far smarter than our DNA and our brain!!!

That would be God.

Accidents (i.e. evolution) have zero intelligence so how could accidents create something with intelligence? They can't!! Intelligence is a top-down process and someone a lot smarter than humans had to design human DNA and the DNA for every one of the several million species on this planet, many of which have a male and female.

Could accidents or monkeys design and build a Buick automobile? Of course not. It takes a lot of intelligence, including many different specialties, to build a Buick automobile. Only humans can build an automobile. Likewise, only God could create the DNA for several million species of plants, animals and insects.


Article: Where Did The "First Child" For A New Species Come From?

Here is an article on the topic of who were the first humans born on this planet:
Article: From the First Child to Superclusters


Article: Where Did God Come From?

The truth is that God had to exist long before our Universe was created and our sun was created and this planet was prepared for earth life. So people naturally want to know where God came from!!

Brigham Young, who was born in 1801 (Darwin was born in 1809), the second prophet of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (the Mormons), said this about the first cause of all things (i.e. where God came from):

  • Many have tried to penetrate to the First Cause of all things; but it would be as easy for an ant to number the grains of sand on the earth. It is not for man, with his limited intelligence, to grasp eternity in his comprehension ... It would be as easy for a gnat to trace the history of man back to his origin as for man to fathom the First Cause of all things, lift the veil of eternity, and reveal the mysteries that have been sought after by philosophers from the beginning.

In other words, there was a "First Cause" of all things - a beginning - but this beginning happened so long ago, and so many quadrillions of things have happened since then, that these events are far, far beyond human comprehension.

By the way, the largest desert on this planet is 5.5 MILLION SQUARE MILES in size (the Antarctica Polar Desert)!! The Arctic Polar Desert is 5.4 MILLION SQUARE MILES in size!!

There are a lot of grains of sand on this planet for the ant to count!!

If Brigham Young had known these two facts, and other facts about deserts, I doubt he would have changed his statement.

  • "I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use."
    Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)

While Brigham Young did not know very much about the Universe in his day, he did understand the principle that the "first cause of all things" is beyond human comprehension.

Brigham Young also said this about God:

  • He is the Supreme Controller of the universe. At his rebuke the sea is dried up, and the rivers become a wilderness. He measures the waters in the hollow of his hand, and meteth out heaven with a span, and comprehendeth the dust of the earth in a measure, and weigheth the mountains in scales, and the hills in a balance; the nations to him are as a drop in a bucket, and he taketh up the isles as a very little thing; the hairs of our heads are numbered by him, and not a sparrow falleth to the ground without our Father; and he knoweth every thought and intent of the hearts of all living, for he is everywhere present by the power of his Spirit -- his minister, the Holy Ghost.

This article is specifically about where God and the Universe came from:
Article: Where Did God And The Universe Come From?


A Summary and Overview Of Some Key Issues

So far we have barely touched the surface of the reasons evolution cannot be true, yet even at this point we have no logical choice except to conclude that God exists. Different religions may have different beliefs about God, but there is no choice except to say that God does exist. In the Mormon religion (the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints) there are three separate Gods in the Godhead. The head God (Heavenly Father), the Savior (Jesus Christ) and the Holy Ghost.

If scientists are so smart, and believe that God does not exist, can they create a Universe with a planet like Earth that has several million species, many of which have both a male and female? Let's think about it.

What is the difference between "creating" a brand new Buick versus "destroying" a brand new Buick by driving it over a cliff??

The difference is that the new Buick being driven off the cliff must have been created before it was driven over a cliff.

How does driving a Buick over a cliff help explain how the Buick got created in the first place?? It doesn't.

So how does finding the remains of an extinct animal (i.e. its fossil) tell us how it was created?? It doesn't. All it tells us is that this animal used to be alive, but now it is dead.

An animal must be alive before it is dead. A fossil does not tell us how an animal was created, it only tells us that the animal is dead.

But even extinct animals had to have DNA and their DNA had to create them either from an enclosed egg (e.g. a chicken egg) or a fertilized egg (e.g. humans or monkeys).

Every animal on this planet, including humans, came from a single DNA strand which was inside of an egg. Whether they came from an enclosed egg (i.e. a chicken egg) or a single fertilized egg in a mother, the animal (including humans) came from a single object and then morphed over time into what it was when it was young and eventually died.

So the evolution debate is not about where bones came from, it is about where DNA came from. How did "morphing of the embryo" algorithms come to exist for many, many complex species, especially when there is a male and female in the species?

The evolution debate is therefore about statistics. There are so many past and present highly sophisticated DNA strands for both extinct and living animals that the theory of evolution has become ludicrous.

But it is not just about the creation of DNA, it is also about viable permutations of nucleotides on DNA. Even if DNA could be built, the probability it has a viable permutation to create an animal from a single cell is mathematically insane.

It is far beyond the scope of this home page to talk about many subjects. But trust me: the probability of a viable permutation of nucleotides, to create both a male and female for a single advanced species (the permutation of nucleotides on the DNA would have to be almost perfect in order to perform the morphing of the embryo for both a male and female offspring), etc. is so ludicrous it could not happen a single time in the estimated age of this Universe or a billion consecutive Universes.

In summary, here are just a few reasons evolution (i.e. accidents) could never have created human beings:
1) Creating DNA from scratch (e.g. for the "first living cell") is impossible for many reasons (humans still cannot do it),
2) Creating a cell from scratch, by accident, is impossible for many reasons (the inside of a cell is like a small city) (humans cannot do it),
3) Creating life from non-life is impossible and has never been done (though it has been attempted),
4) Creating the mechanisms in the cell, which use the DNA as patterns to create proteins, is impossible to happen by accident. For example, how does this mechanism know WHERE on the DNA a specific protein code is located? Only 3% of DNA is coded for proteins (the "WHERE" issue is a topic by itself),
5) Obtaining a viable permutation of nucleotides on DNA, that could create a human baby, is statistically impossible. It would be far more likely to pick a single atom which is hidden among many, many quadrillions of Universes. This is NOT an exaggeration!!
6) And so on.

But even if scientists could create a cell from scratch, would their "new cell" be alive? The answer is 'no' because scientists don't have a clue what "life" really is.

So how did evolution create a living cell, with DNA or RNA inside, with a viable permutation, with the mechanisms to use the DNA patterns, by pure accident?? Accidents don't create intelligence, just ask any computer programmer how long it would take to write a complex computer program using code written exclusively by random number generators. It would never happen.

So if humans cannot design and create from scratch DNA or RNA, plus a cell for the DNA or RNA to exist inside, and give their new cell "life," with a viable permutation of nucleotides, why would anyone believe that a series of pure accidents (i.e. evolution) could have created the "first living cell" in a sterile pond?

Because that is what they hear in school and on YouTube.

The atheists and evolutionists are great story tellers but they are complete dolts at common sense and logic!!! Popularity and money outranks their brains.

Many reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true are mentioned in various other articles on this website, such as the "Twenty-Five Reasons The Theory of Evolution Cannot Be True" article.


The Evolution Debate

While there are more than 350 books which are favorable to the theory of evolution there are also more than 350 books which are strongly critical of the theory of evolution!!

There are also many YouTube videos on both sides of the debate.

Those who are critical of the theory of evolution are called "creation scientists" or "creationists" because they believe the scientific data favors a "Creator" of the Universe.

In fact, if you want to get published in a leading biology journal you better be an atheist and your article better support the theory of evolution. If it does not praise evolution your article will end up in the trash can, not in a "science" journal.

From the incomprehensible sophistication of DNA, to the amazing complexity of cells, to the earth we live on, to the ends of the Milky Way Galaxy, to the furthest galaxy cluster and supercluster (by the way, the supercluster we live in is called the Laniakea Supercluster), and considering the "constants" in physics (e.g. the gravitational constant); the credibility of the theory of evolution has dropped to ABSOLUTE ZERO!!!



Note: In order to prevent this home page from becoming massively too big, some topics, which would normally be put on the home page, have been moved to their own article.


More Detailed Articles On Special Topics


Article: Permutations - The Ultimate Death Of The Theory of Evolution

This article uses more advanced mathematics to demonstrate the total absurdity of the theory of evolution.

If evolution could create a new DNA strand (which it can't), evolution could only RANDOMLY sequence the nucleotides on any DNA strand for a new species. But the vast, vast, vast, vast percent of permutations of nucleotides would not create any type of animal at all!! For example, some of the permutations would create deformed animals that cannot survive. But most permuations would not create anything!!!

Most permutations of nucleotides would not even create a deformed animal, it wouldn't create anything at all!!

So where are the countless dead animals which evolution could not quite create?? There are none because the theory of evolution never happened.
Article: Permutations - The Ultimate Death Of The Theory of Evolution


Article: Fifteen Reasons The Theory of Evolution Cannot Be True

While there are hundreds of reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true, this article is a list of fifteen of the best reasons evolution cannot be true plus this article digs much deeper into the DNA issues which destroy the theory of evolution:
Article: Fifteen Reasons Evolution Cannot Be True (Very Important To Read)


Article: Twenty Reasons Evolution Cannot Be True

This article was written at a different time than the "Fifteen Reasons" artcle so it has a little overlap, but is generally different.
Article: Twenty Reasons Evolution Cannot Be True


Article: Twenty-Five Reasons Evolution Cannot Be True

This article was written independently from the Fifteen Reasons and Twenty Reasons articles so it is a significantly different list.
Article: Twenty-Five Reasons Evolution Cannot Be True


Article: More Than Four-Hundred Reasons Why The Theory of Evolution Cannot Be True

Here is a list of more than 400 reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true. In each category one or more items are flagged that represent a significant reason evolution could not have happened by a series of accidents.
Article: More Than 400 Reasons Why The Theory of Evolution Cannot Be True


Article: Unlimited Reasons Evolution Cannot Be True

The number of reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true, which are discused in this article, will probably grow as time goes on, so this article does not have a specific number of reasons evolution cannot be true in its title. But right now it has far less than 400 reasons. But it does have some of the newer reasons.

In other words, this article will change from time to time as I come up with new and improved reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true. So it has a generic title. But this is an important article that will frequently have some of the best reasons evolution cannot be true.
Article: Unlimited Reasons Evolution Cannot Be True


Article: A Focus On Human DNA

This article has three sections which talk more about human DNA and why the discovery of DNA has eliminated any possibility that the theory of evolution is true:
Article: A Focus On Human DNA


Article: The Sixteen Cells Mystery

Hold on to your seatbelt, it is not just the computer programs on the DNA that control the "morphing of the embryo" that are incomprehensible, it is the way that the morphing algorithms work!! There is no computer program on this planet that could be designed to work the way the "morphing of the embryo" algorithms work.

Here is an article that traces the "morphing of the embryo" until there are 16 cells in the fetus. This article demonstrates that DNA should not even be called a computer program. In this article you will learn why no team of computer programmers on earth could even begin to replicate the way that DNA works!!!
Article: The Sixteen Cells Mystery!! [Read the entire article!!!]


Article: The Hidden Agenda Of The Theory Of Evolution

There is far more to the theory of evolution than just a claim that there is no God. As this article shows, the hidden agenda of the theory of evolution is to create a mirror-image of the Gospel of Jesus Christ which is designed to pull people away from God!!
Article: The Hidden Agenda Of The The Theory of Evolution


Article: The Theory of Evolution Is A Religion!!!

The theory of evolution and atheism are identical!!! They are both religions of atheism.

This article goes into detail about how the leading evolutionists are atheists and their doctrines are designed to lead people to beome atheists!!

Woody Allen, Stephen Hawking, Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, etc. are all atheists who tout the theory of evolution as valid science so they can get converts to atheism!!
Article: The Theory Of Evolution Is a Religion


Article: The Use Of Clever Definitions

There is absolutely no scientific evidence to justify the theory of evolution. So what do the atheists and evolutionists do to generate bogus "evidence" for the theory of evolution??

One way is the use of very, very clever definitions, also known as "deceptive definitions." By using clever definitions the atheists and evolutionists can create "evidence" for the theory of evolution out of thin air, so to speak.

In other words, they can use a scientific fact which has absolutely nothing to do with the creation of new DNA (which is required for evolution to be true) and like a magician they can create imaginary evidence for the theory of evolution.

This article goes into more depth on this issue:
Article: The Trick of Using Clever Definitions By The Atheists And Evolutionists


Article: The Complexity of Cells (and 3 YouTube Videos)

There is human DNA inside of every cell (except some red blood cells), but human DNA is not the only highly sophisticated object inside the cells. There are many other complex objects, some of which were created by the genes on the DNA. Cells are unbelievably complex!!

In the book: Essential Cell Biology, Third Edition, a section header on page 410 reads: Transmitter-gated Channels in Target Cells Convert Chemical Signals Into Electrical Signals." This is not something you read in the comic section of the newspaper.

Cells could not have been created by a series of accidents!!

For more information about the complexity of cells, see this article:
Article: The Complexity of Cells (Includes 3 YouTube Videos!!)


Article: Could a Simple Cell Exist?

Evolutionists understand the problems with creating a human cell from scratch, so they claim that the "first living cell" was a simple cell and that numerous increasingly complex types of cells "evolved" between the "first living cell" and human cells.

First of all, there are no "simple cells." Even the simplest cell on this earth has DNA (except for some red blood cells, however, there is no way these red blood cells can divide!!) and inside each cell is also an incredible, miniature factory.

For more information about whether a simple cell could exist, see this article:
Article: Could A Simple Cell Exist?


Article: Comparing DNA to Computer Programs

Ponder this carefully: every one of the millions of complex, or even moderately complex, computer programs on this planet was written by human beings. NONE OF THEM were written by random number generators to simulate the way that evolution must work!!! Every computer program has been written by intelligent human beings who studied computer languages and programming!!

This article logically compares the existence of DNA to writing computer programs and explains why DNA could not have come to exist by accidents:
Article: Comparing DNA to Computer Programs


Article: Why Do We Need Computer Programmers??

The DNA for millions of different species are vastly superior to any computer program written by any team of computer programmers!!

So if randomness (i.e. evolution) created all of the most sophisticated computer programs on earth (i.e. DNA) then randomness should also be able to design the far, far less sophisticated computer programs used by businesses, the military, individuals, etc.

This article provides another viewpoint to the evolution debate:
Article: Why Do We Need Computer Programmers?


Article: Permutations - The Ultimate Death Of The Theory of Evolution

This article goes into much more detail about why permutations of nucleotides are among the ultimate deaths of the theory of evolution.

The permutation issue is so bad for the theory of evoultion that there literally would not be a single species, on this planet, or in the Universe, if there were not a God to design DNA.
Article: Permutations - The Ultimate Death Of The Theory of Evolution


Article: Pride Is The Driving Force Of The Theory of Evolution

This article details exactly why the theory of evolution exists!! The answer is pride. Many atheists and evolutionists cannot stand to think that someone might be smarter than they are, much less MASSIVELY smarter than they are!!
Article: Pride Is The Driving Force Of The Theory Of Evolution


Article: What Did Darwin Know?

Charles Darwin knew nothing about cells and he knew nothing about the DNA inside of those cells. In fact, based on what scientists knew in Darwin's day, the data that Darwin had access to fully supported his theory of evolution!! It was not until 1953, with the discovery of DNA, that Darwin's theories could be disproven!!

This article is actually in defense of Darwin based on what scientists knew in his day!!
Article: What Did Darwin Know?


Article: A Challenge To The Atheists and Evolutionists

The atheists and evolutionists claim that all DNA can be created by a series of accidents either from scratch or by the modification of an existing DNA strand.

This article poses a challenge to the atheists and evolutionist to prove their theories are credible:
Article: A Challenge To The Atheists and Evolutionists


3 Articles: Key Issues In The Evolution Debate

This is a set of three articles which provide a very high level overview of why the theory of evolution cannot be true:
Article: Part 1 of 3: Creationism Versus Evolution - Who Wins??
Article: Part 2 of 3: The Hidden Agenda of Evolutionists
Article: Part 3 of 3: What is Life?



The Two Free eBooks On This Website

Chapter Summary: Medium-size eBook (37 pages, pdf file): Patterns of Intelligence - Chapter Summary

If you want a quick, high level overview of the Patterns of Intelligence book, this article has a short summary of each chapter in the 266 page medium-size this book:
Summary: Patterns of Intelligence - Chapter Summary Only


Technical Medium-Size eBook: (266 pages, pdf file): Patterns of Intelligence

While the large book on this website is the "B-2 Bomber" of anti-evolution books, this book is the "F-22 Raptor" of anti-evolution books. This free book is actually much more current on the issues of the great scientific deceptions which are going on and the mathematical reasons evolution cannot be true. However, it does not go into the depth of the long book on the mathematical reasons evolution cannot be true.

Did you know that if you listed all major LDS doctrines (i.e. Latter-Day Saint or Mormon) and then took the opposite of each of these doctrines you would end up with the theory of evolution doctrines!! This book will produce such a detailed list in Chapter 2.

In this book you will see one of the main arguments of the large book, called "Patterns of Intelligence." This eBook has some really cool graphs.

But there are many things in the medium size book which are not in the large book. For example, chapters 22 and 23 of this book contain an amazing discussion which demonstrates that there is nowhere near enough information on DNA to control the "morphing of the embryo" algorithms!! Either God Himself designed DNA (and we cannot even remotely understand it) or the morphing of the embryo has help from the other side of the veil. There is no other option!!

Here is a link to the medium-sized book in one file. As always, you are welcome to read it online, download it, or print it out:
Free eBook: Patterns of Intelligence (pdf file)

Here is a link to the individual chapters in the medium-sized book. Each chapter is a file so it is easy to focus on one chapter at a time:
Free eBook: Patterns of Intelligence (pdf file for each chapter)


Technical Long eBook: (407 pages, pdf file): Prophets or Evolution - An LDS Perspective

This book is the "B-2 Bomber" of anti-evolution books. It demolishes the theory of evolution time after time and takes no enemies. The discovery of DNA has created an avalanche of ways to prove the theory of evolution is scientific nonsense.

This free eBook is available in both HTML and PDF formats and both versions can be looked at online or can be downloaded. For example, you can download the PDF version and print it out so you can mark it up. As always, you don't even need to tell me you downloaded it!!

The long eBook is called "Prophets or Evolution - An LDS Perspective," which:
1) Compares the doctrines of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (i.e. LDS church) to the theory of evolution (chapters 1-12),
2) Details many of the massive scientific problems with the theory of evolution (chapters 13-36).

The book in HTML format (by chapter):
Free eBook: Prophets or Evolution - An LDS Perspective (html version)

A printable version of the entire book (407 pages) is available in pdf format and can be read or downloaded from this link. It can also be printed out:
Free eBook: Prophets Or Evolution - An LDS Perspective (pdf file)


Chapter of Long Book: "Seven Scientific Reasons ... Evolution Cannot be True"

The complete "Prophets or Evolution" book is over 400 pages. This is a link to one of the key chapters in the main eBook. This chapter is a high level overview of seven of the main scientific reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true. It also mentions seven other reasons evolution cannot be true. Here is a link to this chapter:
Chapter: Seven Scientific Reasons the Theory of Evolution Cannot be True


Other Anti-Evolution Books

If you listen to the propaganda of the pro-evolution monopoly you might think that anyone who believes in creation science is a dolt. Nothing could be further from the truth. There are many "creation scientists" (i.e. those who believe God created this Universe) who are brilliant and have no problems seeing through the false science generated by the scientific establishment.

In fact, many anti-evolution books have been written by brilliant scientists. This listing of anti-evolution books and DVDs contains only a small sampling of the anti-evolution books which exist in print. In fact, there are more than 200 anti-evolution books.

Many of the books were written by PhDs in the sciences. The arguments in these books totally shred the theory of evolution from a scientific standpoint.

Some of these books may be out of print and you may have to use a book finder, such as Alibris, to find them.

Here is a link to this appendix:
Appendix: Books and Movies Against the Theory of Evolution


Biography And Email Address Of R. Webster Kehr

PLEASE SPREAD THE WORD ABOUT THIS WEBSITE!!!

My biography, and a whole lot of other things, are in this article:
Article: Biography of R. Webster Kehr

My email address is camouflaged to avoid web crawlers:


Note: Due to the fact that Google is a piece of g.a.r.b.a.g.e, this area is reserved for additional keywords:
This website is the best creation science website on the Internet This website is the best anti-evolution website on the Internet This website is primarily about Prophets versus Evolution, meaning Evolution versus Prophets.
This is an intelligent Design article for Mormons or Latter-Day Saints.
And this manuscript also deals with Prophets versus Darwin, meaning Darwin versus Prophets.
It includes detailed discussions about Prophets or Evolution in addition to Evolution or Prophets.
This website discusses in detail the topic of intelligent design for Mormonism.
Included are large discussions about Mormonism versus Evolution, and furthermore Evolution versus Mormonism.
Creation Scientists forget that God without Living Prophets is like mashed potatoes without gravy.
Intense discussions and debates about Mormonism or Evolution as opposed to Evolution or Mormonism are part of this website.
This LDS website, loyal to LDS doctrines, is mainly about Mormons versus Darwin, meaning Darwin versus Mormons.
This LDS website, by a member, is about Mormons versus Evolution, meaning Evolution versus Mormons.
These free articles and books are clearly and intentionally about intelligent Design website for Mormons.
This site also includes long discussions regarding Mormonism versus Darwin, plus Darwin versus Mormonism.
This website about living prophets and evolution does not forget to discuss Mormonism or Intelligent Design.
The details do not exclude the issues of Prophets or Darwin in addition to Darwin or Prophets.
This website definitely is mainly about Mormons or Darwin and not incidentally about Darwin or Mormons.
It intentionally includes discussions about Mormons or Evolution and not accidentally about Evolution or Mormons.
This website carefully includes the important topic of intelligent design and Mormonism.
There is no doubt that this website is an intelligent Design for Latter-Day Saints or Mormons website.
Creation Scientists remember to talk about God, but they forget to talk about living prophets.
What good is God without Living Prophets to lead the people of God? But it is primarily about Mormonism or Darwin as opposed to Darwin or Mormonism.
This prophets or evolution website includes chapters and discussions about Mormonism and Intelligent Design.
There is no doubt at all that this website is inclusive of intelligent Design for Mormons.