• This website contains two free eBooks and many free articles plus a massive spreadsheet in two formats. The top section is VERY IMPORTANT so make sure you read all of it.

    At the bottom of this page is an "Additional Section" for Latter-Day Saints (LDS). This section has a yellow background. My name is R. Webster Kehr. My background is in mathematics and cancer research. My email address is at the bottom of this page.


    Where Did We Come From: God or The Theory of Evolution?

    How many times have you heard the question: "Where did we come from?"

    There are two groups which claim to have the answer:
    1) The prophets teach that our spirits are literally the children of God and that God created Adam and Eve.
    2) The proponents of the theory of evolution teach that all things were created by a long series of accidents and they teach that there is no God.

    Because the followers of the theory of evolution claim there is scientific evidence for their theory, let us first look at whether there is any credible scientific reasons that support the theory of evolution.

    The atheists and evolutionists claim that "natural selection" is a key element of the theory of evolution. But natural selection is about a strong species (which already exists) eliminating a weaker species (which also already exists).

    While natural selection is true, natural selection has absolutely nothing to do with the CREATION of the DNA for any species. Natural selection is strictly an ELIMINATION PROCESS and by no stretch of the imagination is it a CREATION PROCESS

    Remember, the theory of evolution is all about WHERE each species comes from!! Natural Selection has nothing to do with explaining where a species comes from, all it explains is why a species may NO LONGER EXIST!!

    In other words, natural selection is totally worthless UNTIL AFTER MULTIPLE SPECIES ALREADY EXIST!!!

    This cannot be emphasized enough, the fact that natural selection is true has absolutely nothing to do with the creation of new DNA for a new species of plant or animal!!

    There is nothing the atheists love to do more than claim that natural selection is a key factor in why the theory of evolution is true!! However, NATURAL SELECTION is an ELIMINATION PROCESS and either God or evolution (depending on what you believe) would be the CREATION PROCESS which created each species!!

    IF "NATURAL SELECTION" IS TO BE CONSIDERED A SERIOUS FACTOR IN THE CREATION OF ANY NEW SPECIES, IT MUST EXPLAIN HOW NATURAL SELECTION CAN CREATE NEW DNA STRUCTURES!! The truth is that natural selection has nothing to do with creating new DNA structures so it has nothing to do with "evolution"!!!!


    A Few Reasons Why The Theory of Evolution Cannot Be True

    The theory of evolution must explain: Where did NEW species come from!! However, because it is now known that every species is created by its DNA (i.e. by the algorithms on its DNA), the real question is this: "Where did NEW DNA come from??"

    When thinking about where new DNA came from, it is critical to understand that the terms: "evolution" and "accident" and "chance" and "no God" and "no plan" and "no intelligence and "no design" and "no direction" and "randomness" and "mistakes" all mean exactly the same thing - it is the claim of atheists and evolutionists that nothing but pure accidents created our Universe, including our planet, and the DNA for every species of animals and plants, including humans.

    So what we must do is determine whether "accidents" could have created everything in this Universe, from galaxy clusters to the DNA of ants!!! So let us ponder this issue.


    First, all of the scientists on this planet could not create a DNA strand from scratch!!!!

    For example, suppose there was a wall with many beakers and each beaker contained EXACTLY ONE element from the Periodic Table. Using nothing but the items in the beakers, all of the scientists on this planet could not create a functional DNA strand from scratch!!

    If you think scientists could make a DNA strand from scratch (even ignoring the permutation issues for a moment) study the image at the top of this article (the right hand image is the axis of a DNA strand):
    Image of DNA Double Helix (Right Image - Click Image to Magnify!!)

    In 1953, when Watson and Crick discovered DNA, they had no clue what DNA was all about. It is now known that DNA is so sophisticated that all of the scientists in the world, combined, could not construct a single, complete DNA strand from scratch!!!

    Scientists have studied human DNA since 1953 and they still only understand about 2% of human DNA. Human DNA is by far the most highly sophisticated computer program on this planet and yet many people claim that human DNA was created purely by a series of accidents!! This is nonsense.


    Second, even if scientists could create a DNA strand from scratch, they would have NO CLUE how to put the nucleotides in an ordering (i.e. a permutation) that could create a human baby.

    Just like the ordering of '0's and '1's in a compiled computer program determine what the computer program will do, the ordering of nucleotides (A, C, G and T) on a DNA strand determine what kind of plant or animal will be created by the instructions on that DNA!!

    That is so critical to understand, let me repeat it:

    Just like the ordering of '0's and '1's in a compiled computer program determine what the computer program will do, the ordering of nucleotides (A, C, G and T) on a DNA strand determine what kind of plant or animal will be created by the instructions on that DNA!!

    For example, the ordering of the 3.2 billion nucleotides (A, C, G, or T), on human DNA are so sophisticated that a single cell, with a single DNA strand, namely the fertilized egg inside of a mother-to-be, has the intelligence on the DNA to create an entire baby, via 30 billion cell divisions, who has 30 billion cells and 60,000 miles of blood vessels, etc.

    The blood vessels of this tiny baby would wrap around the earth, at the equator, twice, with 10,000 miles of blood vessels left over!!

    In addition, when the baby is born he or she will have an incredible brain which is connected to the nervous system, a skull to protect the brain, a spine to protect the spinal cord (the spinal cord is a cylindrical bundle of nerve fibers), two eyes which are connected to the nervous system, a beating heart, a liver, a pancreas, 300 bones (which eventually fuse into 206 bones), etc. etc.!!

    And all of this sophistication came from the instructions embedded on a single DNA strand inside the fertilized egg in the mother, followed by 30 billion cell divisions!!

    The evolutionists claim that a series of mindless accidents (i.e. evolution) can create human male DNA (in his sperm cells) and human female DNA (in her egg/ovum). And they also claim that this series of accidents can randomly put these nucleotides in an ordering such that via 30 billion cell divisions a human baby will be born with 30 billion cells and 60,000 miles of blood vessels.

    What have the evolutionists been smoking??

    Scientists have only decoded 2% of human DNA so they certainly could not even begin to order the nucleotides on a new human DNA strand to create a human baby!! And if humans have only decoded 2% of human DNA, how did the "theory of accidents" (i.e. evolution) create human DNA from scratch, including the sequence of nucleotides??!!

    And where are the failures of this process? There are 1090 atoms in this Universe, but there are 43,200,000,000 different ways that a DNA strand can be sequenced (i.e. ordered) but only a very, very, very, very minute percent of these permutations would create a viable human baby. And that is just for humans. There is unique DNA for every species of plants and animals on this planet.

    Accidents (i.e. evolution) would create vastly, vastly, vastly more failures in the attempt to create the DNA for a human baby than there are atoms in the Universe. This means our entire Universe would not be big enough to hold all of the failures of evolution just to create a single human DNA strand!!!

    The "morphing of the embryo" algorithms on DNA may occupy 97% of human DNA. They are essentially computer programs that control how a single fertilized egg becomes a new human baby with about 30 billion complex cells each of which must end up in just the right place at just the right time and have the correct genes activated!!

    As you watch this video remember that a human being starts out as a single cell with a single DNA strand (the fertilized egg).

    This incredible 9 1/2 minute video by Alexander Tsiaras graphically shows the "morphing of the embryo" of a human baby, which is controlled by DNA and no doubt by the spirit of the child:
    YouTube Video: "From Conception to Birth" (i.e. the "Morphing of the Embryo")

    The video mentions that at 4 weeks, 1 million cells a second are being made and at birth a newborn baby has 60,000 miles of blood vessels. This process must be incomprehensible in complexity because if these blood vessels were not fully enclosed, before blood started to circulate in the fetus, the fetus would bleed to death!! So the "timing" or "sequence" of the creation of these cells is critical!!

    How could evolution ever accidentally create that level of sophistication?? If a new species was not able to enclose all of the thousands of miles of blood vessels before the blood started to circulate, every baby of that species would die and the species would immediately die off.

    As if that weren't incredible enough, the instructions for the morphing of the embryo come from inside the cells, where the DNA is!! Cells divide from the inside-out. And remember each cell has exactly the same DNA, yet each of the 30 billion cells ends up in a unique location in the baby with a specific set of genes activated.


    Third, is the fact that once DNA is constructed, it cannot be changed, it can only be damaged!! If you understood how DNA is constructed, this would be obvious. What this means is that you cannot take an existing DNA strand and randomly modify its structure because to do this you would have to cut the DNA strand. If you cut a DNA strand IT CANNOT BE PUT BACK TOGETHER!!

    This means neither you nor Mother Nature can modify a DNA strand and then put it back together. DNA simply cannot be modified because of the way it is built.

    In fact, all of the scientists in this world could not cut a DNA strand in half and then put it back together. It would be far worse than cutting a thread in half and then trying to glue the two pieces back together thinking the thread would be just as strong.

    DNA cannot be changed once it is made!! Sections cannot be deleted and new sections cannot be added. In other words, the DNA for a new species cannot be created by humans or by evolution (i.e. accidents) by modifying the DNA of an existing species (i.e. changing the number of nucleotides)!!! This is because of the physical construction of DNA.

    The DNA for EVERY SPECIES on this planet had to be created INDEPENDENTLY FROM SCRATCH!! Only God can create a new DNA strand!!

    That is so important let me repeat it:

    The DNA for EVERY SPECIES on this planet had to be created INDEPENDENTLY FROM SCRATCH!! Only God can create a new DNA strand!!

    For example, male human DNA and female human DNA could not have been created by mutating the DNA of a male and female ape. Ape DNA cannot be modified, it can only be damaged.


    Fourth, are specific issues related to species with a male and female. All of the scientists on this planet, and on millions of other planets, could not create human DNA, for a male and female, from scratch, which was sophisticated enough to create a single human baby.

    They could not even design the DNA for a male hamster and a female hamster, such that this pair of hamsters could have offspring which could in turn have offspring. And scientists certainly could not do it for two humans.

    For humans, the DNA inside of a male sperm cell will lead to a male baby and the DNA inside of a female sperm cell will lead to a female baby. But the DNA of the sperm cell must align with the DNA in the female egg so that their offspring will have features of both parents!!

    This alignment and sophistication, which is one of the major reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true, could not have happened by a series of accidents.

    The DNA for every species of plant and animal on this planet had to be designed and created by a massively intelligent Designer. A new unique DNA structure, to create a new species, simply cannot be created by a series of accidents, meaning by evolution.

    DNA was also designed by God to allow a great deal of variety within the same species (such as a Boxer dog and a Chihuahua dog). The world would be a very boring place if there was only one kind of dog and only one kind of horse, etc.

    The vast number of species on this planet, each with unique DNA by definition, and many with both a male and female, is easily the number one reason the theory of evolution cannot be true!!


    Fifth, all of the scientists in the world could not create a cell for DNA to reside inside!! Hundreds of scientists have PhD degrees in Cell Biology or Biochemistry, so why would anyone claim that cells were created by accident?

    As one example, if the cell needs a specific enzyme then the cell will use a pattern on the DNA called a "gene," to create the enzyme. But scientists would not have a clue where each gene begins except that the DNA provides ways to find where genes begin (e.g. "promoters"). The sophistication of DNA is simply beyond human comprehension.


    Sixth, the atheists and evolutionists claim that a "first living cell" formed by a series of accidents in a "warm pond" billions of years ago. Before there was any life on this earth our planet would have consisted of nothing but water (and even water would not exist if there had been a Big Bang - the heat from the Big Bang would have evaporated any water), sand and rocks.

    How could a living cell form from nothing but water, sand and rocks?? And how could life be created from non-life? Scientists have never created life from non-life, and they have tried.


    Seventh, consider that when the fertilized egg in the mother divides, the new baby consists of only two cells. When these two cells divide there are four cells. The four cells become eight cells and the eight cells become sixteen cells.

    These sixteen cells should be identical to the fertilized egg, but they are not identical!! If they were identical to the fertilized egg the baby would have 16 heads, 16 hearts, 32 arms, 32 legs, etc. But that is not what happens. Each of the 16 cells leads to different sets of cells which integrate with each other!!

    How is it possible that these sixteen cells create sixteen different sets of cells in the baby and these sixteen sets of cells merge together perfectly!! See the "When There Are Sixteen Cells During the Morphing of the Embryo" article which is mentioned below for more information.

    I rate this the #2 reason the theory of evolution cannot be true, this item also applies to all species of plants and animals.


    Eighth, is the fact that life on this planet almost certainly could not exist, certainly human life, were it not for the phytoplankton in the oceans. It is phytoplankton that provides between 50% and 90% of the oxygen on this planet.

    See this web page for more information on phytoplankton:
    Phytoplankton Article

    The point is that this entire planet had to be designed by God or life could not exist on this planet.

    Other issues we could talk about would include the orbit of the earth around the sun (the earth must be the right distance from sun), the oceans, the clouds, soil, trace minerals, the rotation of the earth, the importance of the moon, the physical constants, etc. Some of these are discussed on this website.


    Conclusion

    So far we have barely touched the surface of the reasons evolution cannot be true, yet even at this point we have no logical choice except to conclude that God exists. Different religions may have different beliefs about God, but there is no choice except to say that God does exist. In the Mormon religion (the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints) there are three Gods in the Godhead. The head God (Heavenly Father), the Savior (Jesus Christ) and the Holy Ghost.

    But the atheists and evolutionists need to pretend the theory of evolution is true in order to get converts to atheism and evolution. So the theory of evolution is not going away any time soon.

    So where did God come from? We cannot conceive the answer to that question even if we were told; but consider what Moses 7:30 (the Book of Moses is in the Pearl of Great Price) states about Heavenly Father: "And were it possible that man could number the particles of the earth, yea, millions of earths like this, it would not be a beginning to the number of thy creations; and thy curtains are stretched out still; and yet thou art there, and thy bosom is there; and also thou art just; thou art merciful and kind forever;"


    The Magnitude Of The Problems With The Theory Of Evolution

    The above items, and more to come, are just a few of the hundreds of reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true which are discussed on this website.

    But I should emphasize that the MAGNITUDE of the reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true is simply beyond comprehension. The permutation issues of the DNA for thousands of species, many with both a male and female, alone would eliminate any chance that the theory of evolution is true. And the construction of DNA is another issue of such magnitude that the theory of evolution simply cannot be true.

    Do not look at each reason the theory of evolution cannot be true as being equal with the other reasons. Some reasons are massive enough, by themselves, to make the theory of evolution completely ludicrous!!!

    Now I want to make it very clear that many students have been fooled by the atheists and evolutionists. This is nothing to be ashamed of. The atheists have perfected the art of deception, they are well-organized, very well-funded and their claims are highly polished!!!


    More Details On Why The Theory of Evolution Cannot Be True

    Scientists say that 98% of DNA is "junk DNA." Then where did the information come from to control the morphing of the embryo from a single cell into a crying baby?

    Because scientists are too stupid to understand 98% of human DNA, and how this 98% controls the morphing of the embryo, and likely other things, they call this DNA "junk DNA"?

    But "junk DNA" is literally the most sophisticated computer program on this planet!!

    And ask yourself this question: if scientists cannot build a DNA strand from scratch, and order (i.e. sequence) the nucleotides, even for an ant, and if scientists don't have a clue how DNA works; why do they claim that a series of accidents has created the DNA for THOUSANDS of species on this planet, including humans??!!

    Are the atheists just plain stupid?? No, the problem is arrogance. Atheists don't want a God to exist because a God would be massively smarter than they are. So most of them do everything in their vivid imaginations to pretend there is no God and that everything in the Universe came to exist by pure chance. God is replaced by mindless accidents.

    But I can tell you that the permutation of nucleotides issue alone is enough to render the theory of evolution complete scientific nonsense. Even if scientists could physically create a DNA strand, an ant would have as good a chance at ordering the nucleotides on human DNA as any team of humans would.


    More On The Male/Female Issue

    Humans and many other species have both a male and female whose DNA must align with each other!!

    In other words, the DNA in the male sperm cells (some sperm cells are male and some sperm cells are female) must be able to create a male or female baby. But the DNA in his sperm cells and the DNA in her egg must align with each other so they can have male or female babies who have some features of both parents!! How did all of this happen by accident!! It didn't.

    Also, once the sperm cell is inside of the ovum (the female egg), how is the DNA pulled out of the sperm cell? Even if the process is considered to be simple, the question still remains: how did it happen by a series of accidents?

    And how does this DNA, after it is extracted from the sperm cell, line up with the DNA of the ovum? They need to both be pointed in the correct direction and the first nucleotide of both need to be lined up. And all of this must be done AFTER the sperm cell is already inside of the ovum!!!

    Plus the first male human and first female human would have had to live on this earth in the same timeframe and same latitude and longitude. Ditto for all other animals which have a male and female. It is hard to imagine how the first male box turtle found the first female box turtle on this planet!!

    And where are the failures of evolution? If evolution were true, for every species on this earth there would be many, many trillions and trillions of failures due to imperfect sequences of nucleotides (e.g. the dead animals had DNA for male or female which was not quite good enough to create viable offspring or the male and female DNA did not align perfectly enough).

    In fact, quadrillions of Universes would be full of dead creatures in an attempt to create the DNA for a single human baby by a series of accidents. The permutation issue alone would guarantee this, but the construction of DNA would also be a factor.

    But the theory of evolution has other problems. Scientists could not create a single cell for the DNA to reside in. Nor could they create the many other things which are inside the cell that are part of the continuous activities going on inside of almost every cell.

    Nor could they figure out how to make a cell divide into two cells, including copying the Golgi Apparatus, for example. Hundreds of scientists have PhD degrees in Cell Biology, so cells are not simple!!


    Creating A New Species From An Old Species

    One of the giant problems for the theory of evolution is how a new species is created from an old species, as claimed by evolutionists. In order for evolution to create a new and improved species from an older species, the DNA of the older species must be RANDOMLY mutated to create new DNA for the new species!! We have already said that this is physically impossible without destroying the DNA, but let us continue anyway.

    Let us compare this claim to the computer language C#. When writing or changing a computer program in C# there are three steps:
    Step #1) Have a computer programmer, trained in C#, change existing "source code" or write new "source code." Source code is what the computer programmer understands,
    Step #2) "Compile" the source code. The "compiler" is a computer program which converts the source code into binary code that the computer understands,
    Step #3) The "binary code," created by the compiler, is executed by the computer.

    Now suppose that a perfectly good C# computer program needed a major upgrade to add a new feature to the program. There are two options to make the changes:
    Option #1) Have the computer programmer make the necessary changes and additions to the source code and then recompile the program, or
    Option #2) Randomly mutate (i.e. randomly change) the object code of the original program and hope that the object code of the new program has all of the old features plus it has all of the desired new features.

    No computer programmer on this planet would choose the second option!! It would be a waste of time and would totally destroy the old program and it would not have any new or old features that worked!!!

    Yet Option #2 is precisely the way that evolution must work!!! There is no "source code" for DNA, there is only "object code" on the DNA. Evolution can only RANDOMLY change the DNA via random mutations!! Yet the atheists and evolutionists claim that the DNA of a perfectly good species can be randomly mutated (by evolution) and the random mutations will create a new and improved species EVERY TIME!!!

    This is nonsense because DNA includes computer programs vastly more sophisticated than any computer program ever written by any team of human beings!!! And the DNA only contains the object code!!

    With the discovery of DNA the evolution debate should have left the domain of biologists and been put under the domain of statisticians looking at DNA. But that will never happen because there are many atheists who need the theory of evolution to sell their books and get new converts to atheism!!

    In addition to things on this earth, scientists also cannot create a single sun from scratch. And is it logical to think that our sun and all of the stars (e.g. the supergiant star VY Canis Majoris), galaxies, superclusters of galaxies, etc. in the Universe came to exist by an accidental explosion called the Big Bang?

    It is absurd to claim that accidents created all DNA, all cells, all stars, all galaxies, etc. But these claims will never go away because the atheists and evolutionists will always be looking for converts. But the truth is that the claims of the atheists are complete scientific nonsense.

    But because atheists are always looking for converts to atheism; each time a new discovery is made by scientists the atheists will simply use their story-telling skills to claim that what was discovered was the result of a series of accidents!!

    But story-telling skills are just the beginning of the deceptions of the atheists. They also use very deceptive definitions to invent imaginary evidence for evolution. For example, by using a clever definition of the term "species" they can generate a lot of bogus evidence for evolution.

    Seven chapters in one of the free eBooks on this website are needed to expose the deceptions of the atheists relative to deceptive definitions.

    But the prophets are absolutely correct: God is the source of all DNA, cells, galaxies, etc.


    Twenty Reasons Why The Theory Of Evolution Cannot Be True

    HTML File: Here is an article that lists twenty reasons why the theory of evolution cannot be true. This article will open as a new window:
    Article: Twenty Reasons Why The Theory Of Evolution Cannot Be True!!


    More Than Four-Hundred Reasons Why The Theory of Evolution Cannot Be True

    HTML File: Here is a list of more than 400 reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true. In each case an item is listed that could not have happened by a series of accidents. This article will open as a new window:
    Article: More Than 400 Reasons Why The Theory of Evolution Cannot Be True


    Why The Theory of Evolution Exists

    So why in the world would any scientist think that all life on this earth, meaning all DNA on this earth, came to exist by pure chance? The reason is that many people are very arrogant and they want to pretend they are the smartest beings in the Universe. So they invent absurd "theories" that claim there is no God and thus they claim that they are the most intelligent beings in the Universe.

    So do the atheists have any credible evidence that everything in the Universe, from galaxy clusters to the DNA of ants, came to exist by pure chance (i.e. by a series of unplanned, undirected accidents)? Absolutely not!!!!

    In fact, this website has already mentioned more than 400 reasons why the theory of evolution cannot be true.

    The theory of evolution exists only because it is a tool of atheists to attempt to get converts to atheism. The leading "evolutionists/atheists" use their imaginative interpretation of science to try and get converts to atheism. But the fact is that the modern-day theory of evolution is scientific nonsense, as I explain many times on this website.


    Amazing Article: "When There Are Sixteen Cells During the Morphing of the Embryo"

    Hold on to your seatbelt, it is not just the computer programs on the DNA that control the "morphing of the embryo" that are incomprehensible, it is the way that the morphing algorithms work!! There is no computer program on this planet that could be designed to work the way the "morphing of the embryo" algorithms work.

    This article traces the "morphing of the embryo" until there are 16 cells in the fetus. This article demonstrates that DNA should not even be called a computer program. In this article you will learn why no team of computer programmers on earth could even begin to replicate the way that DNA works!!!
    Article: When There Are 16 Cells During the Morphing of the Embryo!! [Read the entire article!!!]


    The Hidden Agenda Of the Atheists

    Is the real agenda of the atheists and evolutionists strictly about science?? Absolutely Not!! In fact, I sometimes wonder whether science is even a factor in the evolution debate.

    So what is the real agenda of the atheists? Author and attorney Phillip E. Johnson explains the hidden agenda of the hard-core evolutionists/atheists:

    • "Science [i.e. the scientific establishment] is committed to philosophical naturalism [i.e. atheism] and therefore science must assume that no Creator, and no purposeful intelligence, is behind our existence ... All that science can address is the question of: 'granted that we are here as a result of purposeless material mechanisms, what's the most plausible purposeless material mechanism that we can imagine?'"
      Phillip E. Johnson, professor, author, attorney; quoted on UCTV

    Read that quote two or three times, it is an amazing statement.

    In other words, many in the scientific establishment are atheists, they are too arrogant to admit that a God could exist who is massively smarter than they are, so they set as their goal to get converts to atheism. To do this they find: the "most plausible" scientific theory they can invent to get converts to atheism!"

    Of course, the "most plausible" scientific theory they can invent to get converts is the "theory of evolution."

    With the goal in mind to get converts to atheism, the leading atheists use their talents of lies, "spin" and deception to try to get converts to atheism.


    The Book of Mormon Predicted the Coming Forth of the Theory of Evolution!!

    In the Book of Mormon is the story of Korihor (Alma chapter 30). Korihor was unique in two ways. First, he was taught his doctrines by a personal appearance of the devil, and second, every doctrine Korihor taught was false doctrine; which makes perfect sense when you realize that Korihor was personally taught by satan.

    Korihor was eventually struck dumb by the prophet Alma the Younger and he was soon thereafter killed by a wicked people.

    As that chapter demonstrates: satan does NOT support his followers but rather he drags them down to hell when he is done using them!!

    What doctrines did Korihor teach? Essentially Korihor taught the theory of evolution. For example, he claimed there was no God and he described natural selection in three different ways in the same verse (see Alma 30:17).

    Satan clearly used "natural selection" as a "proof" that accidents created all things and that there is no God. Today, evolutionists also use "natural selection" (which is an elimination process, not a creation process) as "evidence" for the theory of evolution.

    In the account of Korihor, the Book of Mormon was predicting the coming forth of the theory of evolution, and it exposed a key type of deception used by atheists and evolutionists even today and the Book of Mormon was rejecting the theory of evolution when it was first published in 1830, almost three decades before Darwin's first book was published in 1859. STUDY ALMA 30 and you will know what satan is really like.

    My point is that Korihor was struck dumb by a prophet for teaching the theory of evolution!!

    But the account of Korihor was not the only place the theory of evolution was discussed in the Book of Mormon. Anyone who preaches that there is no God is essentially preaching the theory of evolution.


    The Current Evolution Versus Creation Science Debate

    The evolution debate should not be based on the visual forms of plants and animals (i.e. Darwin's phylogenetic tree), but rather it should be based on the probability that the DNA of the plants and animals (and the cells the DNA resides in) came to exist PURELY BY CHANCE (i.e. by the totally random process of evolution)!!

    But what massively sophisticated computer program, and human DNA is the most sophisticated computer program on this planet, has ever come to exist by a long series of pure accidents?

    To understand this better, suppose you were a spy and you were told by your country to steal the instructions of how to manufacture a certain kind of automobile. Would you take a photograph of the automobile or would you steal the schematics of the machines in the factory that made the automobile?? Obviously you would steal the schematics of the machines.

    Likewise, debating the theory of evolution by looking at the visual forms of plants and animals is not scientific because it totally misses the root cause of why the plants and animals exist, which is DNA!!

    The fact is that without DNA there would be no plants and no animals.

    To be more specific, plants and animals are created by the computer algorithms which are on the DNA of the plants and animals. So looking at the visual form of a plant and animal is NOT looking at what causes the plant or animal to exist!!

    Needless to say the atheists and evolutionists don't like to talk about DNA or cells, they like to talk about the visual form of each plant and animal so they can tell their stories. They carefully ignore the fact that computer programs in the human world are never written by random number generators, but evolution itself is essentially a random number generator applied to DNA!! Without God there is nothing but total randomness in nature.

    The key question in the evolution debate is this: knowing that the "computer programs" on DNA in nature are vastly more sophisticated than any "human-designed computer program," how could the "computer programs" on DNA, for thousands of species, have been "written" by totally random processes?

    As will be seen many times on this website, when DNA is looked at during the evolution debate, the theory of evolution becomes scientific nonsense. By definition, there is "no intelligence" in the theory of evolution, especially at the DNA level.

    The only "evidence" the evolutionists have for their theory is to ignore DNA and look only at the visual form of plants and animals and then combine the visual form of plants and animals with their exceptional story telling skills.

    Once DNA enters into the evolution debate the theory of evolution quickly collapses because all DNA is a massively sophisticated computer program, even for an ant.

    The theory of evolution is not only scientific nonsense, it is also a perfect mirror-image of the doctrines of the Mormon/LDS church. In other words, suppose you had a spreadsheet and in the first column you listed the doctrines of the Mormon/LDS church. Then, in the second column, for each item in the first column suppose you created a doctrine in the second column which was exactly the opposite of the LDS doctrine.

    For example, in the first column you might put: There is a God. In the second column you would put: There is no God.

    When done with this spreadsheet, the second column would be a list of doctrines which are exactly the opposite of LDS doctrines and the opposite of some of the doctrines of other Christian churches.

    In fact, the second column of this spreadsheet will also be the theory of evolution!! The theory of evolution is satan's perfect doctrine because it is a mirror image of the doctrines of Christ and His prophets.


    Using Deceptive Definitions To Get Bogus Evidence For Evolution

    Let us define the term "species" or "unique species":

    A "species" or "unique species" is defined to be identical to a "UNIQUE DNA STRUCTURE"!!

    Thus, the term "species" and the phrase "unique species" and the phrase "UNIQUE DNA STRUCTURE" should all mean exactly the same thing!!!

    It was not until 1953, with the discovery of DNA, that the term "unique species" could be correctly defined to be a "unique DNA structure."

    That such definitions should be so formal should not be necessary. However, this formality is absolutely necessary because atheists love to use deceptive definitions to get bogus evidence for the theory of evolution.

    Two more terms need to be formally defined:

    Microevolution means variety within the same species, such as the difference between a Collie dog and a Great Dane dog and a Chihuahua dog - they are all "dogs"!!

    Macroevolution means a new species (i.e. a new DNA structure) has been created by random accidents to an existing DNA structure.

    In short, microevolution is variety within the same species and macroevolution means a new species has been created by random mutations to DNA.

    By now it should be obvious to the reader that NO EXAMPLE of macroevolution has ever been observed!!!

    Darwin observed microevolution but he could not have known that microevolution has nothing to do with the creation of a new species.

    Macroevolution is a false theory because it is impossible to take a highly complex computer program (i.e. the DNA for a species) and mutate it via random accidents (meaning via evolution) into a NEW AND IMPROVED species.

    The fine-tuning of these definitions should not even be necessary except that deceptive atheists, such as Richard Dawkins, intentionally obfuscate terminology in order to get converts to atheism.

    For example, in atheist Dawkin's book: The Greatest Show On Earth, Dawkins uses example after example of microevolution and claims they are examples of true evolution, which is macroevolution. The entire book is a giant lie.

    Why was such a book written? Because there is no scientific evidence for the theory of evolution so Dawkins, in order to get converts to atheism, had no choice except to lie and deceive.

    In short, based on what Darwin knew in 1882, when he died, his theory of evolution was correct. His theory could not be disproven until 1953 when DNA was discovered. When DNA was discovered the definition of the term "species" could be linked to DNA, as it should be!!

    To link the definition of "species" to anything but a unique DNA structure is a gigantic scientific deception!!


    Adam and Eve

    The theory of evolution must explain where TWO humans came from at the same time, and same location on this planet and their DNA could align together in a very specific way!!! The Bible calls these humans Adam and Eve. The Bible correctly identifies the need for a "first" human couple from which the first human babies and all other humans could descend.

    Adam and Eve could not have been created as infants or they would have starved to death because they could not gather their food. They had to be created as teenagers or adults.

    And their food supply, whether plants or animals, had to be created before they were created!!

    The atheists have no credible theory as to how the parents of the first human baby born on this planet came to exist. The "parents" of the first human baby are defined to be "Adam" and "Eve." How did Adam and Eve get on this planet without being born on this planet? God created them.

    The atheists, of course, need to develop some "theory" as to how the first real human babies were born on this earth. What they claim is that the parents of the first human babies born on this planet were mutants (i.e. they had mutated DNA). In other words, the parents of the first human babies born on this planet were children of bonobos or some other primate.

    This theory is absurd because you cannot take the male DNA of a bonobo and randomly mutate it into male human DNA. Ditto for the females. And these impossible mutations had to happen in the same time period and the same location on this planet.

    Most of DNA is a massively sophisticated computer program and you simply can't create a new and improved computer program by randomly mutating an existing computer program at the object code level or at any other level. It will never work.

    The atheists and evolutionists have no credible theory for who the parents, of the first human baby born on this planet, were.

    By context, the DNA of the parents of the first human baby born on this planet would have had DNA that was significantly different than their baby. And their baby's DNA would have been vastly superior to their own DNA!!! This is nonsense.

    The Biblical story of Adam and Eve makes perfect sense even in the day of DNA!!

    God created (the DNA of) Adam and God created (the DNA of) Eve. The Bible is more accurate than most biology books.


    Permutations of Nucleotides

    A "permutation" is a unique way to order something. For example, two brothers, who are not twins, will have DNA which has many differences. The unique ordering of the nucleotides on the DNA for each brother is called a "permutation."

    So the problem for evolutionists is not only creating a DNA strand, but creating a DNA strand with a viable permutation of nucleotides (meaning a viable ordering of nucleotides) which could create a living and functioning baby.

    For example, if a new baby had an ordering of nucleotides of:
    ACGTACGTACGTACGTACGT...
    the baby with this permutation of nucleotides would not survive because there is no intelligence in this ordering.

    Thus, not only is it impossible for a DNA strand to be created in nature, even if it could be so created, the probability that a viable permutation of nucleotides (i.e. an ordering that could create a viable human baby) could happen by accident is far beyond statistically impossible.

    It would be more absurd than trying to create the object code of a massively sophisticated computer program by randomly choosing millions of '0's and '1's.

    Study the next paragraph carefully:

    Randomly creating a viable permutation of nucleotides, even to create a mouse, by chance, would be far less likely than picking a single correct atom, hidden from among all of the atoms in a trillion Universes!! This is not an exaggeration!! This statement may not be politically correct but it is easily mathematically correct.

    So the issues are not just the creation of the cells and the creation of the DNA inside the cells, but a far bigger issue is obtaining a viable permutation for both a male and female (Adam and Eve) that just happen to align with each other such that they can have children who in turn can have children of their own, etc., all the way to you!!!


    Where Did God Come From?

    Let's briefly mention another issue - the Universe. Astronomers believe there are between 100 billion and 200 billion GALAXIES in the Universe.

    Our sun is just one of the stars in our Galaxy and our sun is a million times larger than our earth.

    The star Betelgeuse has a radius 950-1,200 times the size of our Sun. But the star VY Canis Majoris, a red hypergiant star in the Canis Major constellation, is thought to be 1,540 times the size of our Sun.

    If VY Canis Majoris replaced our Sun its size would extend beyond the orbit of Saturn and we would be inside the sun.

    The galaxy we live in, called the Milky Way Galaxy, has up to 400 billion stars. The Milky Way Galaxy is in the Laniakea Supercluster of galaxies. In other words, there are many galaxies.

    As telescopes in space get bigger and bigger more and more stars and more and more galaxies will be discovered.

    Can you imagine what a telescope, with the light-gathering power of the width of our earth, would find!!??

    Of course the atheists have to invent a story to claim that our Universe was created by an accident. So they claim there was a giant explosion called the Big Bang which created the Universe. Oh good grief, who would believe our Universe was created by an accidental explosion? If there was a "Big Bang" it was a project of God.

    The truth is that God had to exist long before our sun was created and this planet was prepared for earth life. So people naturally want to know where God came from!!

    Brigham Young, who was born in 1801 (Darwin was born in 1809), the second prophet of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (the Mormons), said this about the first cause of all things (i.e. where God came from), part of which was mentioned above:

    • Many have tried to penetrate to the First Cause of all things; but it would be as easy for an ant to number the grains of sand on the earth. It is not for man, with his limited intelligence, to grasp eternity in his comprehension ... It would be as easy for a gnat to trace the history of man back to his origin as for man to fathom the First Cause of all things, lift the veil of eternity, and reveal the mysteries that have been sought after by philosophers from the beginning.

    In other words, there was a "First Cause" of all things - a beginning - but this beginning happened so long ago, and so many trillions or quadrillions of things have happened since then, that these events are far beyond human comprehension.

    While Brigham Young did not know very much about the Universe in his day, he did understand the principle that the "first cause of all things" is far beyond human comprehension.

    By the way, the largest desert on this planet is 5.5 MILLION SQUARE MILES in size (the Antartica Polar Desert)!! The Arctic Polar Desert is 5.4 MILLION SQUARE MILES in size!!

    There are a lot of grains of sand on this planet for the ant to count!!

    If Brigham Young had known these two facts, and other facts about deserts, I doubt he would have changed his statement.

    • "I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use."
      Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)


    An Overview Of The Key Issues In The Evolution Debate

    Since 4000 B.C. the prophets have been saying that God created all things. Modern science, because of the discovery of DNA in 1953, has proven the prophets have been correct all along.

    Darwin, to his credit, had no clue that DNA existed or even that cells existed. Thus Darwin could not tell the difference between macroevolution (i.e. a new species has been created by random accidents) and microevolution (i.e. variety within the same species, such as the difference between a Collie dog and a Great Dane dog and a Chihuahua dog - they are all "dogs" and have exactly the same DNA structure).

    Darwin observed microevolution but he could not have known that microevolution has nothing to do with the creation of a new species. It was not until 1953, with the discovery of DNA, that the term "unique species" could be correctly defined to be a "unique DNA structure."

    A dog and a cat are different species precisely because their DNA has a different structure!!

    Evolution must claim that the DNA structure of one "species" can be randomly mutated into the DNA structure of a new and improved "species." But this is literally like claiming a new and improved computer program could be created by randomly making changes to the binary code of another computer program.

    Of course the evolutionists know this is impossible so they use another tactic to deceive people. They claim that there is no difference between microevolution and macroevolution. By doing this they can use examples from microevolution and claim they are true examples of "evolution."

    Macroevolution is a false theory because it is impossible to take a highly complex computer program (i.e. the DNA for a species) and mutate it via random accidents (meaning via evolution) into a NEW AND IMPROVED species with a new and improved DNA strand.

    But the atheists, such as Richard Dawkins, intentionally obfuscate the terms microevolution and macroevolution in order to get converts. For example, in the book: The Greatest Show On Earth, atheist Richard Dawkins uses example after example of microevolution and claims they are examples of true evolution, which is macroevolution. The entire book is a giant lie because there has never been a proven example of macroevolution.

    In short, in 1882, when Darwin died, his theory of evolution was correct BASED ON WHAT DARWIN KNEW AT THE TIME. It could not be disproven until 1953 when DNA was discovered.

    But since 1830, which was 29 years BEFORE Darwin's first book, the Latter-Day Saint church (i.e. LDS or Mormons) has been opposed to the theory of evolution. In fact, the LDS church was responsible for the first book to describe Natural Selection and thus evolution, even before Darwin wrote his first book on evolution!!

    The Book of Mormon predicted and rejected the theory of evolution in Alma chapter 30. More on that later in the Latter-Day Saint section.

    Another topic discussed in an article below is the fact that Natural Selection has absolutely nothing to do with the theory of evolution!! The issue of evolution is not about how animals are DESTROYED by Natural Selection, the issue is how animals are CREATED!!

    Destroying animals after they have been created (by Natural Selection) does not explain how these animals were created!! The issue of evolution is the creation of animals and their DNA, not the destruction of animals by Natural Selection. An article below on Natural Selection is called: Can "Natural Selection" Save The Theory of Evolution?

    Considering all of the species which exist on this earth, and especially the species which have both a male and female (e.g. humans and deer and turtles); and that for species which have both a male and female, the male and female had to come to exist at about the same time and place on this earth so they could have offspring; and their respective DNA must align in an unbelievably sophisticated way so they could have both male and female offspring; to think that all of the DNA for these many species happened by a series of accidents is ludicrous.

    For example, turtles aren't real fast and most of them aren't real big, so how did the first male turtle and first female turtle find each other on this gigantic planet of ours (gigantic from their perspective)? God probably put a few thousand pairs of turtles on this planet in each of several different areas.


    Article: The Complexity of Cells (and 3 YouTube Videos)

    There is human DNA inside of every cell (except some red blood cells), but human DNA is not the only highly sophisticated object inside the cells. There are many other complex objects, some of which were created by the genes on the DNA. Cells are unbelievably complex!!

    I own a book on Cell Biology called Essential Cell Biology, Third Edition, by Alberts, Bray, Hopkin, Johnson, Lewis, Raff, Roberts and Walter. It is a large book with 731 pages!! A section header on page 410 reads: Transmitter-gated Channels in Target Cells Convert Chemical Signals Into Electrical Signals." This is not something you read in the comic section of the newspaper.

    Cells could not have been created by a series of accidents!!

    For more information about the complexity of cells, see this article:
    Article: The Complexity of Cells (Includes 3 YouTube Videos!!)


    Article: Could a Simple Cell Exist?

    Evolutionists understand the problems with creating a human cell from scratch, so they claim that the "first living cell" was a simple cell and that numerous increasingly complex types of cells "evolved" between the "first living cell" and human cells.

    First of all, there are no "simple cells." Even the simplest cell on this earth has DNA (except for some red blood cells, however, there is no way these red blood cells can divide!!) and inside each cell is also an incredible, miniature factory.

    For more information about whether a simple cell could exist, see this article:
    Article: Could A Simple Cell Exist?


    Article: Can "Natural Selection" Save The Theory of Evolution?

    Evolutionists claim that "Natural Selection" will save the theory of evolution!! Natural Selection is considered the "engine that drives evolution." It is the hero of Darwinism.

    However, Natural Selection has nothing to do with creating anything. No new species of plant or animal was ever CREATED by Natural Selection!!

    Natural Selection can only DESTROY animals after they have already been created.

    This article will go into great detail about why Natural Selection has absolutely nothing to do with evolution:
    Article: Can Natural Selection Save The Theory of Evolution?


    What is Life?

    Let us look at the issue: "what is life?" For example, if you took a fish and left it out of the water until it died, and then put it back into the water, why doesn't it come back to life? All of the raw elements for life are still in the fish, so why doesn't it come back to life? There is something more to "life" than just cells and oxygen and water.

    Furthermore, have the evolutionists and atheists ever proven that life can be created from non-life (i.e. inorganic materials)?? Never, never, never - yet they continue to preach atheism.

    While several attempts have been made to create life from non-life (e.g. Miller-Uray, Wong and Hartgerink), the scientists have not only failed to create life, they have also failed to prove it can be done. They cannot create a DNA strand from inorganic material, much less a DNA strand with a viable permutation of nucleotides for life which is inside of a cell!!

    For example, have scientists put a large shell over a pond, which had no life, meaning there was no DNA and no cells (this simulates "prebiotic," meaning "existing before life"), and observed "life" form by a series of accidents, including RNA or DNA inside of a "first living cell" (in that pond), that was alive and had the ability to divide itself into two cells (which would be required for life to continue)?

    Never!!

    Then what is their evidence for evolution? Their only evidence is that many scientists do not believe in God and thus they have no choice except to use their God-given brains to deceive people into believing that everything in the Universe, including human DNA, occurred by chance.

    But the theory of evolution should have been thrown in the trash can when DNA was discovered and when the complexity of cells was also discovered. Yet, as scientists learn more and more about DNA and cells, the atheists continue to cling to the theory of evolution as if it were still 1859, when Darwin's first book was published.

    The only thing that is "evolving" on this planet is the theory of evolution as evolutionists/atheists constantly need to develop new spin to account for the new discoveries about the sophistication of cells, the morphing of the embryo algorithms on DNA, etc.


    Article: Comparing DNA to Computer Programs

    Ponder this carefully: every one of the millions of complex, or even moderately complex, computer programs on this planet was written by human beings. NONE OF THEM were written by random number generators to simulate the way that evolution must work!!! Every computer program has been written by intelligent human beings who studied computer languages and programming!!

    This article logically looks at why DNA could not have come to exist by chance:
    Article: Comparing DNA to Computer Programs


    Article: Why Do We Need Computer Programmers??

    The DNA for many thousands of different species are vastly superior to any computer program written by any team of computer programmers!!

    So if randomness (i.e. evolution) created all of the most sophisticated computer programs on earth (i.e. DNA) then randomness should also be able to design the far, far less sophisticated computer programs used by businesses, the military, individuals, etc.

    This article provides another viewpoint to the evolution debate:
    Article: Why Do We Need Computer Programmers?


    Can Accidents Or Simplicity Create Complexity?

    As one example of complexity, the human eyes are unbelievable in complexity. Yet the sections on human DNA which create the human eyes must be far more complex than the eyes themselves!! And the intelligence who designed the DNA (God) must be far more complex than the DNA itself!!

    In other words, simplicity never creates complexity. To understand these concepts, consider these items:

    First, consider that a human-designed computer program exists because of the human intelligence to write the computer program, the human intelligence to write the computer language, the human intelligence to write the computer language compiler, the human intelligence to design and build the microprocessor, including designing and building the memory chips, etc.

    Second, consider the output of the computer program which is printed on a piece of paper.

    How can the printout on the piece of paper be more sophisticated than the human intelligence needed to write the computer program, to write the computer language, etc.?? It can't!!

    Let's think about the memory chips. I have a son who works for a company that makes memory chips. At times he is sitting in a very large room by himself, with several billion dollars worth of equipment needed to make memory chips!!

    The memory chips cannot be more complex than the machines that made them, and the machines that made them cannot be more complex than the humans who designed them!!

    Simplicity cannot create complexity!!

    Consider the sophistication of DNA such that it creates a person's brain. Let us think about a pianist.

    A pianist must be able to convert thousands on dots on a sheet of music into the movements of their fingers!! To do this the DNA must create the nerves between their eyes and their brain, have the brain process these dots and then the brain controls their fingers. And the DNA must create the muscles on their fingers, etc.

    If all of this is in place, and with thousands of hours of practice, a pianist can play the Rachmaninoff Piano Concerto #3!!

    What created our DNA, which in turn created our brain, had to be far, far smarter than our DNA and our brain!!!

    That would be God.

    Accidents (i.e. evolution) have zero intelligence so how could it create something with intelligence? It can't!! Intelligence is a top-down process and someone a lot smarter than humans had to design the DNA of every one of the thousand-plus species on this planet.


    The Need For Deceptive Definitions

    The atheists, and many other evolutionists, know the problems with creating the "first living cell," human DNA, human cells, etc. So what some atheists have done is develop new tools of deception to continue to get converts to atheism.

    Their tools of deception frequently revolve around deceptive definitions.

    Three of the key terms, which involve deceptive definitions, are: "species," "microevolution" and "macroevolution."

    While there are valid definitions for these three terms, the atheists have come up with their own definitions.

    Their deceptive definitions for these three terms are so sophisticated, so deceptive and so clever that it takes seven chapters (chapters 10-16) in my free Patterns of Intelligence book, linked to below, to unravel them!! I also have a short article on deceptive definitions called: "Why the Confusion About Evolution?" which is linked to below.

    For a quick overview of this article, let us talk about the term "species." With the discovery of DNA the definition of "species" should be: A "unique species" is defined by a "unique DNA structure."

    Duh.

    But if the evolutionists defined a "unique species" to be a "unique DNA structure" there would be zero scientific evidence for the theory of evolution!! Scientists have never, never proven a new DNA structure has been created from scratch or from the DNA of a previously existing species!!

    So some atheists have developed various deceptive definitions for the term "species."

    For example, to generate "evidence" for evolution they use every excuse in the world for not being able to come up with a credible definition of the term "species!!" Instead of using DNA, they define the term "species" by talking about typology (i.e. grouping species by how similar they look to the observer) or phylogeny (i.e. the phylogenetic tree of Darwin)!!

    Why not use a "unique DNA structure" to define a "unique species?" Because that would destroy the theory of evolution overnight.

    Whenever you see any "evidence" for the theory of evolution, it is based on very bad science and/or highly deceptive definitions. The theory of evolution is so blatantly absurd (because of the discovery of DNA and the complexity of cells) that the atheists have no choice except to use multiple forms of deception.


    Article: What Did Darwin Know?

    Charles Darwin knew nothing about cells and he knew nothing about the DNA inside of those cells. In fact, based on what scientists knew in Darwin's day, the data that Darwin had access to fully supported his theory of evolution!! It was not until 1953, with the discovery of DNA, that Darwin's theories could be disproven!!

    This article is actually in defense of Darwin based on what scientists knew in his day!!
    Article: What Did Darwin Know?


    A Summary and Overview Of Some Key Issues

    If scientists are so smart, and believe that God does not exist, can they create a Universe with a planet like Earth that has thousands of species, many of which have both a male and female? Let's think about it.

    What is the difference between "creating" a brand new Buick versus "destroying" a brand new Buick by driving it over a cliff??

    The difference is that the new Buick being driven off the cliff must have been created before it was driven over a cliff.

    How does driving a Buick over a cliff help explain how the Buick got created in the first place?? It doesn't.

    So how does finding the remains of an extinct animal (i.e. its fossil) tell us how it was created?? It doesn't. All it tells us is that this animal used to be alive, but now it is dead.

    An animal must be alive before it is dead. A fossil does not tell us how an animal was created, it only tells us that the animal is dead.

    But even extinct animals had to have DNA and their DNA had to create them either from an enclosed egg (e.g. a chicken egg) or a fertilized egg (e.g. humans or monkeys).

    Every animal on this planet, including humans, came from a single DNA strand which was inside of an egg. Whether they came from an enclosed egg (i.e. a chicken egg) or a single fertilized egg in a mother, the animal (including humans) came from a single object and then morphed over time into what it was when it was young and eventually died.

    So the evolution debate is not about where bones came from, it is about where DNA came from. How did so many thousands of "morphing of the embryo" algorithms come to exist for thousands of complex species, especially when there is a male and female in the species?

    The evolution debate is therefore about statistics. There are so many past and present highly sophisticated DNA strands for both extinct and living animals that the theory of evolution has become ludicrous.

    But it is not just about the creation of DNA, it is also about viable permutations of nucleotides on DNA. Even if DNA could be built, the probability it has a viable permutation to create an animal from a single cell is mathematically insane.

    It is far beyond the scope of this home page to talk about many subjects. But trust me: the probability of a viable permutation of nucleotides, to create both a male and female for a single advanced species (the permutation of nucleotides on the DNA would have to be almost perfect in order to perform the morphing of the embryo for both a male and female offspring), etc. is so ludicrous it could not happen a single time in the estimated age of this Universe or a billion consecutive Universes.

    In summary, here are just a few reasons evolution (i.e. accidents) could never have created human beings:
    1) Creating DNA from scratch (e.g. for the "first living cell") is impossible for many reasons (humans still cannot do it),
    2) Creating a cell from scratch, by accident, is impossible for many reasons (the inside of a cell is like a small city) (humans cannot do it),
    3) Creating life from non-life is impossible and has never been done (though it has been attempted),
    4) Creating the mechanisms in the cell, which use the DNA as patterns to create proteins, is impossible to happen by accident. For example, how does this mechanism know WHERE on the DNA a specific protein code is located? Only 3% of DNA is coded for proteins (the "WHERE" issue is a topic by itself),
    5) Obtaining a viable permutation of nucleotides on DNA, that could create a human baby, is statistically impossible. It would be far more likely to pick a single atom which is hidden among many, many quadrillions of Universes. This is NOT an exaggeration!!
    6) And so on.

    But even if scientists could create a cell from scratch, would their "new cell" be alive? The answer is 'no' because scientists don't have a clue what "life" really is.

    So how did evolution create a living cell, with DNA or RNA inside, with a viable permutation, with the mechanisms to use the DNA patterns, by pure accident?? Accidents don't create intelligence, just ask any computer programmer how long it would take to write a complex computer program using code written exclusively by random number generators. It would never happen.

    So if humans cannot design and create from scratch DNA or RNA, plus a cell for the DNA or RNA to exist inside, and give their new cell "life," with a viable permutation of nucleotides, why would anyone believe that a series of pure accidents (i.e. evolution) could have created the "first living cell" in a sterile pond?

    The atheists and evolutionists are great story tellers but they are complete dolts at having a credible explanation of where everything came from.


    The Evolution Debate

    While there are more than 350 books which are favorable to the theory of evolution there are also more than 350 books which are strongly critical of the theory of evolution!!

    There are also many YouTube videos on both sides of the debate.

    Those who are critical of the theory of evolution are called "creation scientists" or "creationists" because they believe the scientific data favors a "Creator" of the Universe.

    In fact, if you want to get published in a leading biology journal you better be an atheist and your article better support the theory of evolution. If it does not praise evolution your article will end up in the trash can, not in a "science" journal.

    From the incomprehensible sophistication of DNA, to the amazing complexity of cells, to the earth we live on, to the ends of the Milky Way Galaxy, to the furthest galaxy cluster and supercluster (by the way, the supercluster we live in is called the Laniakea Supercluster), and considering the "constants" in physics (e.g. the gravitational constant); the credibility of the theory of evolution has dropped to ABSOLUTE ZERO!!!


    Genes and Evolution (Advanced)

    Here is another problem evolutionists have in defending the theory of evolution. There are about 20,000 genes on human DNA. Each must be "expressed" (i.e. turned on) or "not expressed" (i.e. turned off). The information to turn a gene on or off, for each cell, must come from within that cell.

    But every cell has the same DNA!! So why do different cells have different combinations of genes turned on or off??

    Multiply 20,000 genes (which are expressed differently in different types of cells), by 30 billion cells in a newborn baby and the resulting number is far larger than the 3.2 billion nucleotides on DNA. The number is 600 trillion genes!!

    This means that for each nucleotide on the DNA strand (and every cell has the same DNA strand), there are 187,500 genes (600 trillion genes divided by 3.2 billion nucleotides) which need to be expressed or not expressed!!

    In other words, 600 trillion genes, in the cells of the newborn baby, need to know whether to be activated/expressed or not. But there are only 3.2 billion nucleotides on the DNA in each cell to tell them whether to be expressed or not expressed and each cell has exactly the same DNA!!

    How does the DNA in each cell know which genes to activate for that cell as the baby is growing from a single fertilized egg and the cells are dividing??

    Remember, a human being starts out as one cell (the fertilized egg) which has a single DNA strand with 3.2 billion nucleotides on it and then this cell starts dividing. Every cell in a human being has exactly the same DNA (technically some red blood cells do not have DNA).

    No new information can be added during the morphing of the embryo process because nothing from outside the new baby is integrated into the baby other than milk and food.

    So how can each nucleotide on DNA, which has one of four states (A, C, G or T) control the expression of 187,500 genes?? It can't!! And remember, the DNA also needs the information to control the morphing of the embryo!!

    Here is another issue. When the cell needs an enzyme it has to find the gene that has the pattern to create that enzyme. So how does the cell FIND the correct gene, meaning how does it find the first nucleotide of the gene (on the DNA strand) and how does it find the last nucleotide of the gene (on the DNA strand)??

    Scientists don't have the slightest clue how the cell can FIND the beginning and ending nucleotides of a gene!!

    Plus there is simply not enough information on DNA to control all of the activities that are going on as the baby is being created!!

    And even if there was enough information via compression algorithms, the algorithms on DNA would have to be so sophisticated and incomprehensible that they could not have come to exist by a series of accidents!!

    Why don't most biology textbooks talk about these and many other problems with the theory of evolution? Because they want to pretend the theory of evolution is true and sell books!!


    Evolution After The "First Living Cell"

    Evolutionists claim that the DNA of the first human male and the DNA of the first human female "evolved" independently over millions of years, from the same "first living cell," by a series of accidents called "evolution"!!!

    How did the DNA of the first human father and the DNA of the first human mother "evolve" together from the "first living cell?" How was their DNA synchronized, species after slightly improved species, as the DNA of the males and females evolved independently for millions of years??

    Here is the problem, suppose the male DNA evolved slightly faster than the female DNA evolved. Within thousands of years their DNA would not align and they would not have been able to have any children that survived because their DNA was not compatible!!

    Male DNA and female DNA had to be designed by the same person at the same time - God. Evolution could never have designed two massively sophisticated computer programs (DNA) that could be integrated together to create a third computer program (a baby). And evolution certainly could not have done it in the same time-frame and same locations on the earth.

    Yet the atheists claim that evolution created male and female DNA for many species that have both a male and female. They must claim the male and female DNA "evolved" over the same time period (so they could mate as they slowly evolved over many generations) and they had to live in the same geographical area (also required so they could mate).

    But the truth is that it does not matter what is discovered in cell biology, DNA analysis, etc. because no matter what is discovered, the atheists will either ignore it or give evolution the credit!!

    The evolution debate is not about science, it is about God. If you assume God does not exist, or if you believe God does not exist, you will likely believe in the theory of evolution no matter how absurd it is.

    Unfortunately, many people who believed in God have been tricked into believing in evolution. In fact, that is the precise purpose of the highly sophisticated deceptions of the theory of evolution (and I have only talked about a few of their deceptions) and why it is taught in most schools, but not all schools. In some schools, "creation science" or "intelligent design" is taught and in other schools there are disclaimers about evolution.

    Biology is no longer about science, it is about creative thinking as to how every discovery can be attributed to the theory of evolution in order to get more converts to atheism.

    So let's talk about the two free eBooks that are on this website.

Chapter Summary Medium-size eBook (37 pages, pdf file): Patterns of Intelligence - Chapter Summary

If you want a quick, high level overview of the Patterns of Intelligence book, this article has a short summary of each chapter in the 266 page medium-size this book:
Summary: Patterns of Intelligence - Chapter Summary Only


Technical Medium-size eBook (266 pages, pdf file): Patterns of Intelligence

While the large book on this website is the "B-2 Bomber" of anti-evolution books, this book is the "F-22 Raptor" of anti-evolution books. This free book is actually much more current on the issues of the great scientific deceptions which are going on and the mathematical reasons evolution cannot be true. However, it does not go into the depth of the long book on the mathematical reasons evolution cannot be true.

Did you know that if you listed all major LDS doctrines (i.e. Latter-Day Saint or Mormon) and then took the opposite of each of these doctrines you would end up with the theory of evolution doctrines!! This book will produce such a detailed list in Chapter 2.

In this book you will see one of the main arguments of the large book, called "Patterns of Intelligence." This eBook has some really cool graphs.

But there are many things in the medium size book which are not in the large book. For example, chapters 22 and 23 of this book contain an amazing discussion which demonstrates that there is no where near enough information on DNA to control the "morphing of the embryo" algorithms!! Either God Himself designed DNA (and we cannot even remotely understand it) or the morphing of the embryo has help from the other side of the veil. There is no other option!!

Here is a link to the medium-sized book in one file. As always, you are welcome to read it online, download it, or print it out:
Free eBook: Patterns of Intelligence (pdf file)

Here is a link to the individual chapters in the medium-sized book. Each chapter is a file so it is easy to focus on one chapter at a time:
Free eBook: Patterns of Intelligence (pdf file for each chapter)


Technical Long eBook (407 pages, pdf file): Prophets or Evolution - An LDS Perspective

This book is the "B-2 Bomber" of anti-evolution books. It demolishes the theory of evolution time after time and takes no enemies. The discovery of DNA has created an avalanche of ways to prove the theory of evolution is scientific nonsense.

This free eBook is available in both HTML and PDF formats and both versions can be looked at online or can be downloaded. For example, you can download the PDF version and print it out so you can mark it up. As always, you don't even need to tell me you downloaded it!!

The long eBook is called "Prophets or Evolution - An LDS Perspective," which:
1) Compares the doctrines of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (i.e. LDS church) to the theory of evolution (chapters 1-12),
2) Details many of the massive scientific problems with the theory of evolution (chapters 13-36).

The book in HTML format (by chapter):
Free eBook: Prophets or Evolution - An LDS Perspective (html version)

A printable version of the entire book (407 pages) is available in pdf format and can be read or downloaded from this link. It can also be printed out:
Free eBook: Prophets Or Evolution - An LDS Perspective (pdf file)


A Chapter of the Long Book: "Seven Scientific Reasons ... Evolution Cannot be True"

The complete "Prophets or Evolution" book is over 400 pages. This is a link to one of the key chapters in the main eBook. This chapter is a high level overview of seven of the main scientific reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true. It also mentions seven other reasons evolution cannot be true. Here is a link to this chapter:
Chapter: Seven Scientific Reasons the Theory of Evolution Cannot be True


Other Anti-Evolution Books

If you listen to the propaganda of the pro-evolution monopoly you might think that anyone who believes in creation science is a dolt. Nothing could be further from the truth. There are many "creation scientists" (i.e. those who believe God created this Universe) who are brilliant and have no problems seeing through the false science generated by the scientific establishment.

In fact, many anti-evolution books have been written by brilliant scientists. This listing of anti-evolution books and DVDs contains only a small sampling of the anti-evolution books which exist in print. In fact, there are more than 200 anti-evolution books.

Many of the books were written by PhDs in the sciences. The arguments in these books totally shred the theory of evolution from a scientific standpoint.

Some of these books may be out of print and you may have to use a book finder, such as Alibris, to find them.

Here is a link to this appendix:
Appendix: Books and Movies Against the Theory of Evolution


Additional Section For Latter-Day Saints (LDS or Mormon) And/Or The General Public

NOTE: Not all links below are to this website.

If you live in Utah, Idaho, Nevada, Arizona, Wyoming or New Mexico, please do me a favor. Have one of your children (or you) find out the name and authors of the biology textbook which is being used in their high school. Then send me the city and state, and the name of the book(s) along with the names of the authors. The authors names are important because many biology books have the same title, such as "Biology." I need to know what is actually being taught in these states for future reference.

Also, if you could find out whether this book is used statewide or whether each school district gets to pick their own textbook on Biology.

My email address is at the bottom of this page. Thanks In Advance!!

The rest of this section for Latter-Day Saints provides key information for the youth and adults.



Article: The First Book To Describe Evolution Was NOT Written By Darwin!!!

What was the first book on this planet to describe the theory of evolution?

Hint: the first book to describe the theory of evolution was not written by Darwin!!

The first book to describe the theory of evolution was the Book of Mormon, which was published in 1830, which was 29 years before Darwin wrote his first book. It was obviously not a prophet who taught these doctrines, in Alma chapter 30, it was an "anti-Christ" who was taught his doctrines by a personal appearance of the devil. His name was Korihor (see Alma 30 in the Book of Mormon).

Korihor had several unique characteristics:
1) He was taught his doctrines by a personal appearance of the devil,
2) He taught there was no God and that Christ would not be born (he taught about 70 years B.C.),
3) He taught the concept of "Natural Selection,"
4) Every doctrine he taught was exactly the opposite of the doctrines of the prophets (e.g. Alma the Younger),
5) Korihor was commanded to be struck dumb by a prophet of God - Alma the Younger.

In 1830, the Book of Mormon was predicting the coming forth of the theory of evolution and it was also rejecting the theory of evolution, almost three decades before Darwin wrote his first book!!

Many times since 1830, the leaders of the Mormon church have voiced strong criticism of the theory of evolution, even though the theory of evolution could not be disproven until 1953. This includes the current president of the Quorum of the Twelve, President Russell M. Nelson.

This short article will explain in detail that The Book of Mormon, which was published in 1830 (29 years before Darwin's first book), explained the theory of evolution in detail:
Article: The First Book To Describe Evolution


Article: Where Did God Come From?

So if many Christian churches, including the Mormon/LDS church, claim that God created all species, it is perfectly fair to ask: Where did God come from?

While no one knows the full answer to this question, this article will dig into the subject based on what we have been told by the prophets, both ancient and modern.
Article: Where Did God Come From?


Article: Prophetic Book of Mormon Warnings

This short article goes into more detail about prophets and evolution than what I just mentioned. However, if you plan on reading the Patterns of Intelligence book mentioned below, which is over 260 pages long, it is not necessary to read this article.
Article: Prophetic Book of Mormon Warnings (pdf file)


Spreadsheet: Alma 30: Doctrines of Korihor and Evolution

As a support to the above article, this spreadsheet shows the vast differences between what Korihor taught (i.e. what evolution teaches) and LDS doctrine. This spreadsheet goes verse by verse in Alma chapter 30 and explains the similarities between the teachings of Korihor and the doctrines of the theory of evolution. It also shows how each is the opposite of LDS doctrine:
Spreadsheet: Doctrines of Korihor and Evolution (Excel 2003 file)


Article: The War In Heaven Comes to Earth (Bible and LDS)

Before Adam and Eve were put on this earth there was a war in heaven between the forces of Christ and the forces of Lucifer, who would later become "the devil."

This article goes into detail about the war in heaven that determined who would be born on this planet and who would not!!
Article: The War In Heaven


Semi-Technical Article (14 pages): Why The Confusion About Evolution?

The intentional deceptions of evolutionists, by the use of clever terminology, are why there is such a wide diversity of opinions about evolution among LDS scientists. Very few members of the church understand the sophistication of the deceptions of the scientific establishment.

While these discussions are also in the Patterns of Intelligence book, if you want a quick lesson in understanding the deceptive definitions used by the scientific establishment, this article is for you.
Article: Why The Confusion About Evolution


Statement: The 1909 Official Statement of the First Presidency of the LDS Church

The 1909 statement of the First Presidency on the theory of evolution remains the official document of the church on the theory of evolution. This statement in 1909 was reprinted in the 2002 Ensign. It remains not only the official doctrine of the church, but the best description of the origin of man outside of the scriptures!! It is highly, highly recommended to the reader to study this document very carefully!!! It is unlike anything else you can read on the subject of evolution!!

Here is a link to this magnificent article:
Statement: "The Origin of Man" (Official 1909 First Presidency Statement)

Here is a 14 page article with my comments about the 1909 and 1910 statements of the First Presidency. My comments focus of the relationship between the statements of the First Presidency and what scientists knew between 1909 and 1953:
Article: Understanding the Context of the 1909 and 1910 Statements of the First Presidency


Booklet: True To the Faith (First Presidency)

In addition to the 1909 article, an official booklet issued by the First Presidency in 2004: True to the Faith - A Gospel Reference, while not specifically about evolution, describes church doctrines which are the very antithesis of the doctrines of the theory of evolution (e.g. See topics: Atonement of Jesus Christ; Creation; Fall; God the Father; etc.). This booklet is available on www.lds.org:
Booklet: True to the Faith (Official 2004 First Presidency Booklet)


The Nature of God!! (Talks by Elder Jeffrey L. Holland)

What kind of being is God?? To those who fear they may have sinned beyond the range of the atonement, there is a magnificent message in this general conference talk about the true nature of God!!
Conference Talk: He Hath Filled the Hungry with Good Things

In this conference talk Elder Holland gives us a feel for the love of God towards us.
Conference Talk: The Grandeur of God


The Prophetic Future of the LDS Church (Talk by President Spencer W. Kimball)

Do you want to know the future of the LDS church? A general conference talk by President Spencer W. Kimball provides a clear vision of what the future of the LDS church will be.
Article: The Prophetic Future of the LDS Church


The False Gods We Worship (Article by President Spencer W. Kimball)

This classic article by President Spencer W. Kimball explains about the false gods some members of the church (and to some degree all of us) worship. Its lesson applies directly to the youth of the church!!
Article: The False Gods We Worship


Beware of the Evil Behind the Smiling Eyes (Talk by Elder Neil L. Anderson)

Many attempts to lead the youth of the church astray are made by those who appear to be harmless or even friendly. This talk by Elder Neil L. Anderson, of the Quorum of the Twelve, is a warning to the youth of the church about those with "smiling eyes" who are not who they claim to be.
Article: Beware of the Evil Behind the Smiling Eyes


Quotes: The Power of God and the Future of the Church

These two articles contains quotes from the scriptures and from the living prophets and apostles about the power of God, the future of the LDS church and the final triumph of good over evil.
Quotes: The Power of God and the Future of the Church - Scriptures
Quotes: The Power of God and the Future of the Church - Prophets


The Role and Importance of the LDS Church President

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints is led by a "living prophet." This article is designed to clarify the role and importance of the President of the LDS church. It is mostly quotes of several prominent church leaders about the role and importance of the LDS church President.
Quotes: The Role and Importance of the LDS Church President


Quotes About Church Membership

These are quotes about membership in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. The quotes come from the prophets and apostles.
Quotes About Church Membership


Website: Quotes of LDS Prophets and Apostles

This website has quotes from all of the Presidents of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and many of the Apostles of the church. There are many very powerful quotes on this website.
Quotes of LDS Prophets and Apostles


Video: Creation and Evolution - A Witness of Prophets

This is an outstanding video dealing with the theory of evolution, and especially the quotes of living prophets regarding the theory of evolution.

The official position of the LDS church on the theory of evolution is made very clear in this video!! Many quotes of presidents of the church and modern apostles are presented.

This video is highly recommended for anyone who wonders how the church leaders feel about Darwin and his theory of evolution.

To Obtain a Copy, Visit:
Video: Creation and Evolution



Other LDS Websites on Evolution

This is a web page that links to other websites which discuss LDS doctrine versus the theory of evolution:
Links to Other Websites

Here is an old version of the "Patterns of Intelligence" book:
Patterns of Intelligence (Old HTML Version)



To Learn More About the LDS Church

To learn more about the LDS church, here is their official website to introduce people to the LDS church:
To Learn About the LDS Church
The Official Church Website

Here is a website that has many quotes by many of the apostles and prophets of the LDS church, on a variety of topics:
Living Prophet Website


Church Policy

Even though the LDS Church officially rejects the theory of evolution (see the 1909 Statement, linked to above, and the Book of Mormon, Alma chapter 30, among many other documents), no book or article which is involved in scientific debates or which discusses the scientific issues of the theory of evolution, even if it strongly supports official church doctrine, is endorsed by the LDS church unless it is part of an official church publication.

The gospel deals with eternal and unchanging truths but all of the fields of science constantly change as new discoveries are made. Thus, the church does not establish any scientific claim as being absolute.

As a result, the books and articles written by R. Webster Kehr represent the opinions of the author and are too scientific to be published or endorsed by the LDS church.


About The Author, R. Webster Kehr

This website is a product of R. Webster Kehr, who lives in Missouri. I have two college degrees from Brigham Young University: a B.S. in mathematics (1972) and a B.S. in accounting (1974).

I am a retired cancer researcher (of natural medicine) and before retiring I worked with thousands of cancer patients. I wrote almost all of the articles on the www.cancertutor.com website. It turns out that natural cancer treatments are far, far more effective than orthodox cancer treatments. The www.cancertutor.com website is a great resource for all cancer patients.

My wife Marit, who died May 7, 2016, was from Norway. We met in Provo, Utah a month before I left on my mission to California. She was a genealogist and we have seven children and 20 grandchildren - scattered from Oregon to Alabama.

My email address is below. Whether you have a question or a comment, please feel free to email me. I love to communicate with students about the theory of evolution.

Don't forget to email all of your friends about this website!!

(My email address is camouflaged to avoid web crawlers)


Note: Due to changes in search engine algorithms, this area is reserved for additional keywords:
This website is primarily about Prophets versus Evolution, meaning Evolution versus Prophets.
This is an intelligent Design article for Mormons or Latter-Day Saints.
And this manuscript also deals with Prophets versus Darwin, meaning Darwin versus Prophets.
It includes detailed discussions about Prophets or Evolution in addition to Evolution or Prophets.
This website discusses in detail the topic of intelligent design for Mormonism.
Included are large dicussions about Mormonism versus Evolution, and furthermore Evolution versus Mormonism.
Creation Scientists forget that God without Living Prophets is like mashed potatoes without gravy.
Intense discussions and debates about Mormonism or Evolution as opposed to Evolution or Mormonism are part of this website.
This LDS website, loyal to LDS doctrines, is mainly about Mormons versus Darwin, meaning Darwin versus Mormons.
This LDS website, by a member, is about Mormons versus Evolution, meaning Evolution versus Mormons.
These free articles and books are clearly and intentionally about intelligent Design website for Mormons.
This site also includes long discussions regarding Mormonism versus Darwin, plus Darwin versus Mormonism.
This website about living prophets and evolution does not forget to discuss Mormonism or Intelligent Design.
The details do not exclude the issues of Prophets or Darwin in addition to Darwin or Prophets.
This website definitely is mainly about Mormons or Darwin and not incidentally about Darwin or Mormons.
It intentionally includes discussions about Mormons or Evolution and not accidentally about Evolution or Mormons.
This website carefully includes the important topic of intelligent design and Mormonism.
There is no doubt that this website is an intelligent Design for Latter-Day Saints or Mormons website.
Creation Scientists remember to talk about God, but they forget to talk about living prophets.
What good is God without Living Prophets to lead the people of God? But it is primarily about Mormonism or Darwin as opposed to Darwin or Mormonism.
This prophets or evolution website includes chapters and discussions about Mormonism and Intelligent Design.
There is no doubt at all that this website is inclusive of intelligent Design for Mormons.
// BK1023 - Feb 19, 2016