Welcome To The "Prophets Or Evolution" Website!!
This website contains two free eBooks and many free articles plus a massive spreadsheet. The top section is VERY IMPORTANT so make sure you read all of it!!
At the bottom of this page is an "Additional Section" for Latter-Day Saints (LDS). This section has a yellow background. My email address is at the very bottom of this page.
The Debate Between The Prophets And The Evolutionists!!
There is a critical debate between those who believe that God lives and that God created all things (as taught by the prophets in the Bible and other scriptures); versus those who do not believe in God and who thus believe that everything in the Universe came to exist purely by a series of accidents which are called the "theory of evolution" (as taught by the atheists and evolutionists).
In other words, everything in the Universe, including the Universe itself, was either created by God or by accidents!!
It may seem strange to claim, but the "theory of evolution" should actually be called the "theory of accidents!!" It is important to understand that "evolution" does not create anything, nor is it a force in physics or nature (such as gravity). Evolution is only a concept that there is no God and thus the claim of the atheists and evolutionists is that everything in the Universe, including human DNA for example, has been created by a "series of accidents."
There is no other choice, either everything in the Universe was created by God or by accidents!! One of the contestants is right and one of them is wrong!!
So which belief is correct?? While it is impossible to comprehend the origin of God, it is also statistically ludicrous to claim that the DNA for more than a million species came to exist purely by accident. It can be shown quite easily, via both the structure of DNA and the permutations/sequences of DNA, that the theory of evolution cannot be true (primarily because of the discovery of DNA in 1953)!!
For example, the ordering (i.e. sequencing) of the 3.2 billion nucleotides (A, C, G, or T) on human DNA is a computer program that is so sophisticated that a single cell, with a single DNA strand, namely the fertilized egg inside of a mother-to-be, has the intelligence on the DNA to create an entire human baby, via 30 billion cell divisions, who has 30 billion cells and 60,000 miles of blood vessels, etc.
The blood vessels of this newborn baby would wrap around the earth, at the equator, twice, with 10,000 miles of blood vessels left over!!
When the baby is born he or she will have an incredible brain which is connected to the nervous system, a skull to protect the brain, a spine to protect the spinal cord (the spinal cord is a cylindrical bundle of nerve fibers), two eyes which are connected to the nervous system, a beating heart, a liver, a pancreas, 300 bones (which eventually fuse into 206 bones), etc. etc.!!
This baby came from the instructions on the DNA inside a single fertilized egg, followed by 30 billion cell divisions which were controlled by the DNA in the single fertilized egg!!
Human DNA is by far the most highly sophisticated computer program on this planet, yet many people claim that human DNA was created and ordered/sequenced purely by a series of accidents!!
That is nonsense.
As if that weren't bad enough, there are more than one million species on this planet, thus there are more than one million complex DNA strands and every one of them is far more sophisticated than any computer program ever written by humans!! And human DNA is the most sophisticated of all DNA strands, though it is not the longest DNA strand. The longest DNA strand title goes to a fish: protopterus aethiopicus with 133 billion base pairs (human DNA is 3.2 billion base pairs).
Before the discovery of DNA, no one knew why a dog was a dog and a cat was a cat and a horse was a horse, etc. Now we know, a dog is a dog because the DNA in the fertilized egg of a female dog has the instructions to make a dog via millions of billions of cell divisions!!
In addition, many species have both a male and a female and the DNA of the male and the DNA of the female must align in a very precise way in order for them to have offspring.
How could the world's most sophisticated computer program, the DNA in the fertilized egg of a human mother (which, after conception, contains a mixture of information from the DNA of both the mother and father), have formed by a series of complete accidents!!
All of the scientists in the world could not design, sequence and build the DNA of any insect, plant or animal on this planet. Yet the atheists say that all DNA was built and sequenced by random mistakes (i.e. by evolution)!!
And where are the countless dead animals whose DNA, which was created by random mutations of DNA, was not good enough for the survival of the animal? The Universe would literally be filled with these dead mutants if the theory of evolution were true!!
In short, the evolution debate is NOT "God versus evolution," rather the evolution debate is God versus accidents!! Remember, evolution is NOT a force in nature, rather it is a concept!! Accidents are the "force" that the atheists/evolutionists claim created everything in the Universe (everything which was not created by man according to them).
So the evolution debate is between two forces: "God versus accidents!!"
In addition, the atheists must claim the entire Universe was created by accident!! How could the atheists and evolutionists claim that the entire Universe was created by accident instead of by God? Well, they had to come up with some "accident" that they claimed could create the Universe, including the superclusters of clusters of galaxies. So the atheists invented the concept of a purely accidental "Big Bang." They want you to believe that an accidental explosion (remember, it had to be an accident) created the Universe. I don't think so.
It gets worse. What about the incredible "physical constants." Some of the physical constants have to be unbelievably accurate or our Universe could not exist!! How did the atheists deal with that impossible subject??
One of the most famous atheists came up with the concept of "multiverse," and claimed that there were an infinite number of Universes under construction, but all of them failed to become viable Universes because they did not have the right combination of physical constants. Well, all of them failed, except ours, which just happened to have the right combination of physical constants.
You have to admit the atheists are creative. And that is the point. It doesn't matter what is discovered, the vivid imaginations of the atheists and evolutionists can generate a story for every scientific fact!!
But the truth is that all of the scientists in the world could not create a functional DNA strand, not even for an ant, so how did a series of mindless accidents create the DNA for over a million different species, many of which have both a male and female whose DNA must align in an incredibly sophisticated way??
If the atheists and evolutionists were to claim that scientists could create viable DNA; to make sure they don't cheat I would ask them to design and create the DNA for the extinct Woolly Mammoth (male and female) and Dodo Bird (male and female) and bring them back into existence, able to reproduce!!
All the scientists in the world could not do that. So how long would it take accidents to create and sequence the DNA for a living Woolly Mammoth and Dodo Bird?? How would the atheists like to sit in jail until that happened!!!
After studying DNA since 1953, scientists only understand about 2% of human DNA. This 2% obviously represents the simple parts of DNA. See this image of the axis of Beta-DNA or B-DNA:
The B-DNA (Beta form of DNA) is the most common form of DNA. Now see this VERY SIMPLIFIED webpage about the structure of DNA:
Remember, the theory of evolution was developed by Darwin about 100 years before DNA was discovered. Darwin did not have the slightest clue that DNA existed and he barely knew what a cell was and he had no clue that every animal is created by a single fertilized egg which has DNA which controls millions or billions of cell divisions which are so sophisticated that no scientist has the slightest clue how DNA controls these cell divisions!!!
But the atheists and evolutionists will never accept defeat (well, some of them have switched over), so when scientists cannot do something, instead of attribute the DNA, cells and body structure to God, they attribute it to accidents!!
When looking at the sophistication of the construction of DNA, and the vast, vast number of permutations (i.e. it is easier to think of a "permutation" as a unique way of ordering a set of objects - a set of nucleotides in this case) does not deter the atheists and evolutionists from believing that accidents created the Universe and everything in it that is not man-made.
But remember that the theory of evolution is only a concept or belief of the atheists that everything in the Universe came to exist by a "series of accidents!! Actually, it is vastly more wishful thinking on the part of the atheists and evolutionists than it is scientific!!!
The theory of evolution may be a great recruiting tool for the atheists, but it is very, very bad science!!
To expand on this discussion, when thinking about where new DNA came from to create a new species, it is critical to emphasize that the terms: "accident" and "no God" and "no plan" and "no intelligence" and "no design" and "no direction" and "randomness" and "evolution" and "chance" and "concept" and "mistakes" and "visualizations" and "wishful thinking" all mean exactly the same thing: nothing but accidents.
They are exactly the same thing as the claim of atheists and evolutionists that nothing but pure accidents created our Universe, including our planet and moon and oceans and the DNA for every species of animals and plants on our planet, including humans.
Are you surprised that the "theory of evolution" puts scientists at the top of the intelligence chart in the Universe!! THAT IS THE REAL REASON WHY THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION EXISTS!! Only a scientist who is a complete idiot, or has a giant ego, or is horrible at statistics would claim that the DNA for over a million species were created and sequenced by nothing but accidents!!
Natural Selection (i.e. Survival of the Fittest)
One of the pillars of the theory of evolution, according to the atheists, is "natural selection."
Scientists claim that natural selection is a key part of evolution. However, natural selection is an ELIMINATION PROCESS. Natural selection eliminates species which already exist (i.e. the strong species eliminate the weak species). Natural selection is nothing but an elimination process.
While "natural selection" is a true principle, let me mention that natural selection has nothing to do with creating anything!! Natural selection is purely an elimination process, whereby weak species are killed-off by strong species!!
The validity of natural selection has absolutely nothing to do with "evolution!!!"
In fact, natural selection and evolution work against each other!! Natural selection is trying to destroy existing species so the strong survive and evolution is trying to create new species!!! Natural selection would easily win that battle because it works millions of times faster than creating new DNA by totally random processes (if accidents could create a new species, which they can't)!!!
While no one argues the validity of natural selection, as an elimination process, what people do argue about is the creation of new species, which is known as "evolution" by the atheists and evolutionists. Let me emphasize: the "evolution debate" is not about the elimination of species via NATURAL SELECTION, it is about the creation of new species via GOD OR EVOLUTION (depending on what you believe)!!
The point is that "evolution," according to the atheists, must create at least two species BEFORE natural selection can kill-off the weaker species (assuming the species find each other). The problem is that because of the discovery of DNA, it is impossible for any species to exist!!
Thus, natural selection is totally irrelevant to the evolution debate both because there should not be any species to eliminate (because accidents cannot create DNA or sequence the DNA), but even if species could be created by a series of accidents, the only thing that natural selection can do is destroy the weaker species!!
Yet the atheists claim that evolution works BECAUSE OF NATURAL SELECTION!!! How dumb can the scientific establishment be?
More On The Evolution Debate After The Discovery of DNA In 1953
The evolution debate made a dramatic change when DNA was discovered in 1953!! "Scientists" now had to explain how DNA came to exist by a series of accidents!!
Today it is obvious that a single fertilized egg contains the instructions to create a baby animal, even humans, via millions or billions of cell divisions!! However, scientists don't have the SLIGHEST CLUE how DNA can create a new baby via millions or billions of cell divisions!!!
We can compare human DNA to a computer program, though human DNA is vastly more sophisticated than any computer program ever written by humans.
If evolution were true, computer programmers would not be needed because random number generators (i.e. evolution or accidents) could create the object code of every computer program on earth!! But random number generators could NEVER create the object code of a viable computer program!!
Any computer programmer who is told to write the object code for his or her computer programs with a random number generator would just laugh at the idea.
It is now known that human DNA is like the "object code" of a massively complex computer program. But there is no "source code" and there is no compiler.
To demonstrate this with bar charts, see one of the chapters in one of the free eBooks on this website. This chapter is a series of bar graphs which prove, beyond any doubt, that accidents cannot create a viable DNA strand. And these bar charts do not even discuss the physical construction of DNA!! Click:
The term "evolution" in the time of Charles Darwin and the term "evolution" today mean totally different things because Darwin knew almost nothing about cells and nothing about DNA!!! Darwin only saw the visual form of animals.
Can the atheists and evolutionists explain how accidents created the DNA for more than a million species by a series of pure, undirected accidents?? Absolutely Not!!
More About The Creation Of New Species
The fact is that all of the scientists in the world, combined, could not create the DNA of an ant, much less the DNA for a human, so why would anyone believe that accidents/evolution could create the DNA for more than a million species, many of which have both male and female DNA which must align with each other?
When Charles Darwin was alive scientists had no clue that DNA existed so they had no clue how a single fertilized egg, such as in a human mother, grew into a human baby via cell divisions. In fact, they barely knew what a cell was, and they had no clue what DNA was!!
So I am in no way critical about Charles Darwin himself. Given what scientists knew when he wrote his two books, his theories were very credible.
However, unlike in Darwin's day, it is now known that all species are created by the instructions on their DNA via many cell divisions!!! In other words, all animals are created via a single fertilized egg in the mother, followed by millions or billions of cell divisions which are controlled by the instructions on the DNA inside of the initial fertilized egg and all subsequent cells.
It is also certain that humans, and perhaps animals, have a "spirit" which aids in the creation of the baby. The Latter-Day Saints (i.e. Mormons) claim that all people existed as spirits before they were born on this earth.
In short, all of the cells in an animal, including humans, are created by the cell divisions which are controlled by the intelligence on the DNA which is inside the fertilized egg and is inside of all subsequent cells created by the cell divisions (with rare exceptions), however, the "spirit" of the animal (especially humans) may also help direct this process!!!
So the key question about the validity of evolution has become: can DNA be created and sequenced by a series of random accidents (i.e. by "evolution") such that this DNA can control the creation of a human baby (for example) via billions of cell divisions?
The answer is an emphatic: NO!!!!!! In fact, the answer is NO for many reasons!!!
My point is that if all of the scientists in the world could not create the DNA, nor sequence the nucleotides on that DNA, for an ant, or any other insect, plant or animal; why do so many scientists claim that all DNA on this planet came to exist by a series of pure, undirected and unintended accidents (i.e. evolution)?
That is the key question!!
Pride Is The Driving Force Of Evolution
The reason the atheists and evolutionists believe this nonsense is pride. Many scientists want people (e.g. their students) to believe that they are the most intelligent beings in the Universe, so they invent all kinds of stories to claim that everything in the Universe came to exist by pure chance. Doing this eliminates God as being a superior being.
It is also common for the atheists to comment: "If there was a God, God would reveal Himself to us to prove He exists!!" But we are on this earth to be tested and if God revealed Himself to us (before our test is completed) it would interfere with our "free agency." In other words, it would destroy our test for God to show Himself to us.
God must be far more sophisticated than the things He has created. And God has created DNA. This alone proves the massive intelligence of God, but there are many, many other things that also prove the massive intelligence of God.
But the atheists are too proud to believe in God. God is the competition. Without believing in God, the atheists and evolutionists must claim that human DNA, and the DNA for more than a million other species, were all created by pure accident!!
It is God or accidents!!
But with the discovery of DNA the theory of evolution should have been eliminated from science textbooks, but that will never happen because the theory of evolution is such a good recruiting tool for atheists and there are many arrogant atheists in the political and scientific establishments. They don't want any competition from God.
When Charles Darwin wrote his two books on evolution, in 1859 and 1871, scientists knew almost nothing about cells and nothing about the DNA inside the cells. So it appeared to the scientists at that time that life was simple and could easily have formed by a series of accidents.
But with the discovery of DNA in 1953, everything changed. It was now known that life is literally incomprehensible!! Not only have scientists not been able to create life from non-life (and they have tried), they only understand about 2% of human DNA after studying it since 1953. In fact, almost every cell in your body has a DNA strand, which if uncoiled, would be seven feet long!!
If you uncoiled every DNA strand in all of the cells in an adult human, and connected the uncoiled DNA strands together, end-to-end, this strand would wrap around the earth, on the equator, 167,000 times!!!
Plus, at conception, the male DNA from the father and the female DNA from the mother must be able to align such that this couple can have both male and/or female human babies (depending on whether a male sperm cell or female sperm cell gets to the ovum first and how many eggs are in the mother).
This also applies to all species which have a male and female.
But the problem with the atheists and evolutionists is NOT that they are stupid, the underlying reason the theory of evolution still exists is money and pride. Hundreds of atheists and evolutionists make money by writing and selling books which spread their lies and deceptions.
Using natural selection as "evidence" for the theory of evolution is only one of their major lies. Another major lie has to do with their invention of deceptive definitions. By using clever and deceptive definitions they can create "evidence" for evolution where there is no evidence. In other words, like a magician pulling a rabbit out of a hat, by using deceptive definitions they can create imaginary evidence for the theory of evolution.
There is much more on this topic below. But for now let us stick to science.
The next section is one of the MAJOR REASONS the theory of evolution cannot be true and it also has to do with DNA!!
The Claim Of Creating A New Species (i.e. New DNA) From An Old Species (i.e. From Old DNA)
Let us consider the claim of evolution that the DNA for a new species can be created by randomly modifying the DNA of an old species.
In order for evolution (i.e. accidents) to create the DNA for a new species, by randomly modifying the DNA of an existing species, the accidental changes to the (old) male DNA and the (old) female DNA (as required by the theory of evolution) must be in the same sections of their DNA (e.g. the same new genes in the same sections of their respective DNA) so that their offspring will have the new section(s) of their DNA from both their mother and father!! This is part of the alignment issues required by evolution.
But not only must the genes and other sections of DNA align between the male and female (as evolution is making changes to the DNA of both the male and female at the same time so the male DNA and female DNA will align with each other), the morphing of the embryo algorithms sections on the DNA of the male and female (Note: this is my terminology for the sections of DNA which control the cell divisions of the baby) must also align because it is the morphing of the embryo algorithms that control the 30 billion cell divisions as the new baby is being made!!
This last sentence alone represents an issue so devastating to the theory of evolution that it would destroy the theory of evolution by itself!! It is like the evolutionists saying that you could take the object code (i.e. binary code) of the world's most sophisticated computer program and RANDOMLY make changes to this object code and end up with a superior computer program which has new features!!!
But it is much worse than that because with human DNA, and the DNA of many other species, there are two gigantic computer programs (male DNA and female DNA) which are each massively more sophisticated than any human-designed computer program!!! Plus these two biological computer programs on two DNA strands must align with each other so their offspring have features of both parents. Try doing that with the object code of two different computer programs!!
There is no way that the morphing of the embryo algorithms, on the father's DNA and the mother's DNA, would align with each other after a massive series of accidents!! In addition, these changes must occur in the same timeframe and same location on this earth or the male and female would not find each other as the massive number of accidents (i.e. evolution) were happening.
This is such a powerful comment that it is essentially a proof that the spirit of the human being (or other animal) was created first and that the spirit of the new baby, combined with the DNA of the new baby, work together to create the new baby!!!!
It is insane to think that for species after species, which have both a male and female, that the DNA of the male and the DNA of the female could align each time there is a new species.
Because of this, the entire concept of "transitional species" is total nonsense!!!! Plus there are many other reasons one species cannot be converted into another species, much less a superior species.
As another example, once DNA is constructed it cannot be changed, it can only be damaged!! If you understood how DNA is constructed, this would be obvious. What this means is that you cannot take an existing DNA strand and randomly modify its structure (to create a new species) because to do this you would have to cut the DNA strand. But if you cut or break a DNA it is impossible to connect the segments back together because of the way that DNA is constructed!!
These, and other issues discussed elsewhere on this website, mean that you cannot create a new species, with new DNA, from the DNA of an old species.
In summary of this section: the fact that natural selection is true has absolutely nothing to do with the creation of new DNA for a new species of plant or animal!!
There is nothing the atheists love to do more than claim that natural selection is a key factor in why the theory of evolution is true!! But remember, NATURAL SELECTION is an ELIMINATION PROCESS and either God or evolution (depending on what you believe) would be the CREATION PROCESS which created the DNA for each species!!
We can safely ignore any claim that evolution is true (and I am just getting started). It should be obvious that God lives and that God is intelligent far beyond human comprehension.
Brigham Young said this about God:
For more quotes about God, see this amazing article:
Comments About Deceptive Definitions
WARNING ABOUT CLEVER DEFINITIONS: Scientists sometimes claim that accidents/evolution can create a new species from an old species. On this website the concept of "new species" means there is "NEW DNA." Creating a new species (i.e. new DNA) via changing the DNA of an existing species, is very different than creating a new species (i.e. new DNA) from scratch!!! Nevertheless, both creating new DNA and modifying existing DNA are physically impossible and mathematically impossible for humans to do!!
This is both because of the physical construction of DNA and the concept of permutations of nucleotides (e.g. DNA is literally the most sophisticated computer program on this planet).
Scientists have NEVER, NEVER, NEVER created a new DNA strand from scratch or successfully modified an existing DNA strand. However, by using a clever definition for the term "species" scientists can create a new "species" (according to their clever definitions of the term "species"), but they have never created any new, functional DNA strand from scratch, nor have they successfully modified any existing DNA!!!
And even if they could, they would have no clue how to order the nucleotides on that DNA.
In other words, atheists and evolutionists must use tricky definitions, instead of science, to get converts to atheism and evolution.
There are actually several reasons DNA cannot be created or modified, in fact it is IMPOSSIBLE!!! But this is an advanced topic having to do with the physical construction of DNA and other reasons. From time to time these issues will be discussed.
The point is that it is common for the atheists/evolutionists to use tricky definitions (instead of scientific evidence) to pretend there are examples of "evolution." In one of my free eBooks there are seven chapters devoted to the tricks scientists play by using clever definitions!!!
The Magnitude Of The Problems With The Theory Of Evolution
The above items, and more to come, are just a few of the hundreds of reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true which are discussed on this website.
But I should emphasize that the MAGNITUDE of the reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true is simply beyond comprehension. The permutation issues of the DNA for more than a million species, many with both a male and female, alone would eliminate any chance that the theory of evolution is true. And the construction of DNA is another issue of such magnitude that the theory of evolution simply cannot be true.
Do not look at each reason the theory of evolution cannot be true as being equal with the other reasons. Some reasons are massive enough, by themselves, to make the theory of evolution completely ludicrous!!!
Now I want to make it very clear that many students have been fooled by the atheists and evolutionists. This is nothing to be ashamed of. The atheists have perfected the art of deception, they are well-organized, very well-funded and their deceptions are highly polished!!!
Atheists don't want a God to exist because a God would be massively smarter than they are. So most of them do everything in their vivid imaginations to pretend there is no God and to claim that everything in the Universe came to exist by pure chance. God is replaced by mindless accidents.
So far we have barely touched the surface of the reasons evolution cannot be true, yet even at this point we have no logical choice except to conclude that God exists. Different religions may have different beliefs about God, but there is no choice except to say that God does exist. In the Mormon religion (the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints) there are three separate Gods in the Godhead. The head God (Heavenly Father), the Savior (Jesus Christ) and the Holy Ghost.
In order to prevent this home page from becoming massively too big, some topics, which would normally be put on the home page, have been moved to their own article.
ARTICLES: Some of the articles below will open as a new window!!!
Article: Fifteen Reasons The Theory of Evolution Cannot Be True
While there are hundreds of reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true, this article is a list of fifteen of the best reasons evolution cannot be true plus this article digs much deeper into the DNA issues which destroy the theory of evolution:
Article: Twenty Reasons Evolution Cannot Be True
This is similar to the Fifteen Reasons articles but adds more items so it is somewhat of a different list:
Article: More Than Four-Hundred Reasons Why The Theory of Evolution Cannot Be True
HTML File: Here is a list of more than 400 reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true. In each case an item is listed that could not have happened by a series of accidents. This article will open as a new window:
Amazing Article: The Sixteen Cells Mystery (During the Morphing of the Embryo)
Hold on to your seatbelt, it is not just the computer programs on the DNA that control the "morphing of the embryo" that are incomprehensible, it is the way that the morphing algorithms work!! There is no computer program on this planet that could be designed to work the way the "morphing of the embryo" algorithms work.
This article traces the "morphing of the embryo" until there are 16 cells in the fetus. This article demonstrates that DNA should not even be called a computer program. In this article you will learn why no team of computer programmers on earth could even begin to replicate the way that DNA works!!!
More On The Male/Female Issue
Humans and many other species have both a male and female whose DNA must align with each other!!
In other words, the DNA in the male sperm cells (some sperm cells are male and some sperm cells are female) must be able to create a male or female baby. But the DNA in his sperm cells and the DNA in her egg must align with each other so they can have male or female babies who have some features of both parents!! How did all of this happen by accident!! It didn't.
For example, the genes in each DNA strand of the male and female must be in the same order on the DNA or they could not align. Not only must they be in the same order they must be in the same relative position!! So the ordering is not only important at the nucleotide level but it is also important at the gene level (of course the first item implies the other).
Also, once the first sperm cell to reach the ovum (only this sperm cell is allowed inside the ovum) is inside the ovum (the female egg), how is the DNA of this sperm cell pulled out of the sperm cell? It is not as simple as it sounds.
For example, if a person said that chemicals strip off the outside of the sperm cell, the question arises how can these chemicals dissolve the outside of the sperm cell without damaging the DNA in the sperm cell, which is vastly more sensitive to damage than the sperm cell itself?
And how does this DNA, after it is extracted from the sperm cell, line up with the DNA of the ovum? They need to both be pointed in the correct direction and the first nucleotide of each gene need to line up (i.e. be in the same position). And all of this must be done AFTER the sperm cell is already inside of the ovum!!!
Plus the first male human and first female human would have had to live on this earth in the same timeframe and same latitude and longitude. Ditto for all other animals which have a male and female. It is hard to imagine how the first male box turtle found the first female box turtle on this planet!!
But the theory of evolution has other problems. Scientists could not create a single cell for the DNA to reside in. Nor could they create the many other things which are inside the cell that are part of the continuous activities going on inside of almost every cell. Nor could they figure out how to make a cell divide into two cells, including copying the Golgi Apparatus, for example.
Hundreds of scientists have PhD degrees in Cell Biology, so cells are not simple!! The large textbook Essential Cell Biology, Third Edition, has 8 authors and 730 pages plus many pages of other information!! The Glossery has 596 definitions!!! Cells are clearly not simple!!
By the way, the term "species" was not even defined in the book!! The term should be defined thusly: "a unique species is defined to be a unique DNA strand." But if the atheists and evolutionists used this definition, the theory of evolution would crumble to the ground. This is precisely what so many atheists tap dance around a definition of "species."
There are clearly at least 100 reasons the theory of accidents cannot be true due to the sophistication of cells; and this does not include the many issues created purely by the DNA in almost all cells!! In fact, I have two books on this very issue (and I am sure there are other books on this topic):
These two men are obviously "creation scientists," meaning they believe that God had to create the many species on this earth because they could not have been created by accidents.
Why A New Species Cannot Be Created From An Old Species (Using Computer Programs As An Example)
We have already talked about the problems with creating a new species from an old species by mentioning that existing DNA cannot be modified. But there are other reasons a new species cannot be created from an old species even if DNA could be modified.
Let us compare the claim that a new species can be created from an old species to the computer language C#.
When writing or changing a computer program in C# there are three steps:
Now suppose that a perfectly good C# computer program needed a major upgrade to add a new feature to the program. There are two options to make the changes:
No computer programmer on this planet would choose the second option!! It would be a waste of time and would totally destroy the old program and it would not have any new or old features that worked!!!
Yet Option #2 is precisely the way that evolution must work!!! There is no "source code" for DNA, there is only "object code" on the DNA. Evolution can only RANDOMLY change the DNA via random mutations!! Yet the atheists and evolutionists claim that the DNA of a perfectly good species can be randomly mutated (by evolution) and the random mutations will create a new and improved species EVERY TIME!!!
This is nonsense because DNA includes computer programs vastly more sophisticated than any computer program ever written by any team of human beings!!! And the DNA only contains the object code!!
With the discovery of DNA the evolution debate should have left the domain of biologists and been put under the domain of statisticians looking at DNA. But that will never happen because there are many atheists who need the theory of evolution to sell their books and get new converts to atheism!!
In addition to things on this earth, scientists also cannot create a single sun from scratch. And is it logical to think that our sun and all of the stars (e.g. the supergiant star VY Canis Majoris), galaxies, superclusters of galaxies, etc. in the Universe came to exist by an accidental explosion called the Big Bang?
It is absurd to claim that accidents created all DNA, all cells, all stars, all galaxies, etc. But these claims will never go away because the atheists and evolutionists will always be looking for converts. But the truth is that the claims of the atheists are complete scientific nonsense.
But because atheists are always looking for converts to atheism; each time a new discovery is made by scientists the atheists will simply use their story-telling skills to claim that what was discovered was the result of a series of accidents!!
But story-telling skills are just the beginning of the deceptions of the atheists. They also use very deceptive definitions to invent imaginary evidence for evolution. For example, by using a clever definition of the term "species" they can generate a lot of bogus evidence for evolution.
Seven chapters in one of the free eBooks on this website are needed to expose the deceptions of the atheists relative to deceptive definitions.
But the prophets, past and present, are absolutely correct: God is the source of all DNA, cells, galaxies, etc.
The Hidden Agenda Of the Atheists
Is the real agenda of the atheists and evolutionists strictly about science?? Absolutely Not!! In fact, I sometimes wonder whether science is even a factor in the evolution debate.
So what is the real agenda of the atheists? Author and attorney Phillip E. Johnson explains the hidden agenda of the hard-core evolutionists/atheists:
Read that quote two or three times, it is an amazing statement.
In other words, many in the scientific establishment are atheists, they are too arrogant to admit that a God could exist who is massively smarter than they are, so they set as their goal to get converts to atheism. To do this they find: the "most plausible" scientific theory they can invent to get converts to atheism!"
Of course, the "most plausible" scientific theory they can invent to get converts is the "theory of evolution."
With the goal in mind to get converts to atheism, the leading atheists use their talents of lies, "spin" and deception to try to get converts to atheism.
More About The Primary Purpose Of The Theory Of Evolution Today
With the discovery of DNA in 1953, as I have said, the theory of evolution should have gone away with all of the other obsolete scientific theories. However, there is a very specific reason the theory of evolution sticks around.
While the theory of evolution is not only scientific nonsense, it is a perfect doctrine to get converts to atheism as Phillip E. Johnson explained. But the theory of evolution is much more than just atheism!!
In fact, the theory of evolution is a mirror-image of the doctrines of the Mormon/LDS church. In other words, suppose you had a spreadsheet and in the first column you listed the doctrines of the Mormon/LDS church. Then, in the second column, for each item in the first column suppose you created a doctrine in the second column which was exactly the opposite of the LDS doctrine.
For example, in the first column you might put: There is a God. In the second column you would put: There is no God.
When done with this spreadsheet, the second column would be a list of doctrines which are exactly the opposite of LDS doctrines and the opposite of some of the doctrines of other Christian churches.
In fact, the second column of this spreadsheet will also be the theory of evolution!! The theory of evolution is satan's perfect doctrine because it is a mirror image of the doctrines of Christ and His prophets!!
My point is that the PRIMARY PURPOSE of the theory of evolution has nothing to do with science; it's primary purpose is about religion!!! The primary purpose of the theory of evolution, meaning the purpose of many atheists and evolutionists, is to get converts to atheism!!
One of the tactics of many of the atheists is to mock and destroy the testimonies regarding God of many youth and adults in any church!!
The Current Evolution Versus Creation Science Debate
The evolution debate should not be based on the visual forms of plants and animals (i.e. Darwin's phylogenetic tree), but rather it should be based on the probability that the DNA of the plants and animals (and the cells the DNA resides in) came to exist PURELY BY CHANCE (i.e. by the totally random process of evolution)!!
But what massively sophisticated computer program, and human DNA is the most sophisticated computer program on this planet, has ever come to exist by a long series of pure accidents?
To understand this better, suppose you were a spy and you were told by your country to steal the instructions of how to manufacture a certain kind of automobile. Would you take a photograph of the automobile or would you steal the schematics of the machines in the factory that made the automobile?? Obviously you would steal the schematics of the machines.
Likewise, debating the theory of evolution by looking at the visual forms of plants and animals is not scientific because it totally misses the root cause of why the plants and animals exist, which is DNA!!
The fact is that without DNA there would be no plants and no animals.
To be more specific, plants and animals are created by the computer algorithms which are on the DNA of the plants and animals. So looking at the visual form of a plant and animal is NOT looking at what causes the plant or animal to exist!!
Needless to say the atheists and evolutionists don't like to talk about DNA or cells, they like to talk about the visual form of each plant and animal so they can tell their stories. They carefully ignore the fact that computer programs in the human world are never written by random number generators, but evolution itself is essentially a random number generator applied to DNA!! Without God there is nothing but total randomness in nature.
The key question in the evolution debate is this: knowing that the "computer programs" on DNA in nature are vastly more sophisticated than any "human-designed computer program," how could the "computer programs" on DNA, for more than a million species have been "written" by totally random processes?
As will be seen many times on this website, when DNA is looked at during the evolution debate, the theory of evolution becomes scientific nonsense. By definition, there is "no intelligence" in the theory of evolution, especially at the DNA level.
The only "evidence" the evolutionists have for their theory is to ignore DNA and look only at the visual form of plants and animals and then combine the visual form of plants and animals with their exceptional story-telling skills.
Once DNA enters into the evolution debate the theory of evolution quickly collapses because all DNA is a massively sophisticated computer program, even for an ant.
Using Deceptive Definitions To Get Bogus Evidence For Evolution
Let us define the term "species" or "unique species":
A "species" or "unique species" is defined to be identical to a "UNIQUE DNA STRUCTURE"!!
Thus, the term "species" and the phrase "unique species" and the phrase "UNIQUE DNA STRUCTURE" should all mean exactly the same thing!!!
It was not until 1953, with the discovery of DNA, that the term "unique species" could be correctly defined to be a "unique DNA structure."
That such definitions should be so formal should not be necessary. However, this formality is absolutely necessary because atheists love to use deceptive definitions to get bogus evidence for the theory of evolution.
Two more terms need to be formally defined:
Microevolution means variety within the same species, such as the difference between a Collie dog and a Great Dane dog and a Chihuahua dog - they are all "dogs"!!
Macroevolution means a new species (i.e. a new DNA structure) has been created by random accidents to an existing DNA structure.
In short, microevolution is variety within the same species and macroevolution means a new species has been created by random mutations to DNA.
By now it should be obvious to the reader that NO EXAMPLE of macroevolution has ever been observed!!!
Darwin observed microevolution but he could not have known that microevolution has nothing to do with the creation of a new species.
Macroevolution is a false theory because it is impossible to take a highly complex computer program (i.e. the DNA for a species) and mutate it via random accidents (meaning via evolution) into a NEW AND IMPROVED species.
The fine-tuning of these definitions should not even be necessary except that deceptive atheists, such as Richard Dawkins, intentionally obfuscate terminology in order to get converts to atheism.
For example, in atheist Dawkin's book: The Greatest Show On Earth, Dawkins uses example after example of microevolution and claims they are examples of true evolution, which is macroevolution. The entire book is a giant lie.
Why was such a book written? Because there is no scientific evidence for the theory of evolution so Dawkins, in order to get converts to atheism, had no choice except to lie and deceive.
In short, based on what Darwin knew in 1882, when he died, his theory of evolution was correct. His theory could not be disproven until 1953 when DNA was discovered. When DNA was discovered the definition of the term "species" could be linked to DNA, as it should be!!
To link the definition of "species" to anything but a unique DNA structure is a gigantic scientific deception!!
Adam and Eve
The theory of evolution must explain where TWO humans came from at the same time, and same location on this planet and their DNA could align together in a very specific way!!! The Bible calls these humans Adam and Eve. The Bible correctly identifies the need for a "first" human couple from which the first human babies and all other humans could descend.
Adam and Eve could not have been created as infants or they would have starved to death because they could not gather their food. They had to be created as teenagers or adults.
And their food supply, whether plants or animals, had to be created before they were created!! This requires even more DNA.
The atheists have no credible theory as to how the parents of the first human baby born on this planet came to exist. The "parents" of the first human baby are defined to be "Adam" and "Eve." How did Adam and Eve get on this planet without being born on this planet? God created them.
The atheists, of course, need to develop some "theory" as to how the first real human babies were born on this earth. What they claim is that the parents of the first human babies born on this planet were mutants (i.e. they had mutated DNA). In other words, the parents of the first human babies born on this planet were children of bonobos or some other primate who had mutated DNA for both the male and female (so their DNA could align).
This theory is absurd because you cannot take the male DNA of a bonobo and randomly mutate it into male human DNA. Ditto for the females. In other sections of this website it is explained why DNA cannot be physically changed/improved. DNA can be damaged, but it can never be changed.
Plus we have already talked about changing the object code of computer programs to create a new and improved computer program and how this applies to changing the DNA of one species into a new and improved species via new and improved DNA. And this must also be done for the male and female in the same location and timeframe.
If there were male and female computer programs (i.e. male and female object code), which collectively were joined together to create one computer program object code, then computer programmers would better understand the absurdity of the theory of evolution.
Most of DNA is a massively sophisticated computer program and you simply can't create a new and improved computer program by randomly mutating an existing computer program at the object code level or at any other level. It will never work.
Nor can you join the object code of two massively different computer programs to create a single new computer program which has features of both original computer programs.
The atheists and evolutionists have no credible theory for who the parents, of the first pure human baby born on this planet, were.
By context, the DNA of the parents of the first human baby born on this planet (e.g. a bonobo) would have had DNA that was significantly different than their baby. And their baby's DNA would have been vastly superior to their own DNA!!! This is nonsense.
The Biblical story of Adam and Eve makes perfect sense even in the day of DNA!!
God created (the DNA of) Adam and God created (the DNA of) Eve. And God created the DNA for plants and other animals. The Bible is far more accurate than most biology books.
Permutations of Nucleotides
A "permutation" is a unique way to order something. For example, two brothers, who are not twins, will have DNA which has many differences. The unique ordering of the nucleotides on the DNA for each brother is called a "permutation."
So the problem for evolutionists is not only creating a DNA strand, but creating a DNA strand with a viable permutation of nucleotides (meaning a viable ordering of nucleotides) which could create a living and functioning baby.
For example, if a new baby had an ordering of nucleotides of:
Thus, not only is it impossible for a DNA strand to be created in nature, even if it could be so created, the probability that a viable permutation of nucleotides (i.e. an ordering that could create a viable human baby) could happen by accident is far beyond statistically impossible.
It would be more absurd than trying to create the object code of a massively sophisticated computer program by randomly choosing millions of '0's and '1's.
Study the next paragraph carefully:
Randomly creating a viable permutation of nucleotides, even to create a mouse, by chance, would be far less likely than picking a single correct atom, hidden from among all of the atoms in a trillion trillion Universes!! This is not an exaggeration!! This statement may not be politically correct but it is easily mathematically correct.
(Note: There are 4, raised to the power of 3.2 billion, different ways to order the DNA of a human being!! This number is massively, massively larger than the estimated number of atoms in a trillion trillion trillion Universes like ours.)
So the issues are not just the creation of the cells and the creation of the DNA inside the cells, but a far bigger issue is obtaining a viable permutation for both a male and female (Adam and Eve) that just happen to align with each other such that they can have children who in turn can have children of their own, etc., all the way to you!!!
The Book of Mormon Predicted the Coming Forth of the Theory of Evolution!!
The Book of Mormon was published in 1830, which was long BEFORE Darwin's first book on evolution. In fact, if you are rich you can buy a copy of the 1830 version of the Book of Mormon. There are two sections in the Book of Mormon which PREDICTED the coming forth of the theory of evolution, and they are very different than one another.
First, let us talk about 3 Nephi 29:5-7. Verse 7, which refers to a person becoming "like unto a son of perdition," is very profound and to me it seems to apply to those people who write books (e.g. "to get gain"), give lectures (e.g. "to get gain"), participate in debates (e.g. "to get gain"), etc. which are designed to push atheism and/or evolution and mock the Bible and the miracles of Christ.
In fact, there are hundreds of authors of such books. All of these books are written "to get gain," and all of them very likely mock the Bible, Christ and the miracles of Christ!! Wo unto them!!
Here is a page of examples of Richard Dawkins:
There may be other examples of situations where a person fits the description of "like unto a son of perdition."
But let me also mention that the phrase "to get gain" DOES NOT APPLY to high school or college students who are pushing the theory of evolution because they have been taught the theory of evolution by their teacher or textbook. Students are not pushing the theory of evolution "to get gain!!"
The second place in the Book of Mormon that evolution is mentioned (remember the term "evolution" did not exist in 1830, so it could not be used in the Book of Mormon) is Alma 30. This is the story of Korihor.
Korihor was unique in two ways. First, he was taught his doctrines by a personal appearance of the devil, and second, every doctrine Korihor taught was false doctrine; which makes perfect sense when you realize that Korihor was personally taught by satan.
Korihor was eventually struck dumb by the prophet Alma the Younger and he was soon thereafter killed by a wicked people.
As that chapter demonstrates: satan does NOT support his followers but rather he drags them down to hell when he is done using them!! Alma 30:60 is this: "And thus we see the end of him who perverteth the ways of the Lord; and thus we see that the devil will not support his children at the last day, but doth speedily drag them down to hell."
What doctrines did Korihor teach? Essentially Korihor taught the theory of evolution. For example, he claimed there was no God and he described natural selection in three different ways in the same verse (see Alma 30:17).
Satan clearly used "natural selection" as a "proof" that accidents created all things and that there is no God. Today, evolutionists also use "natural selection" (which is an elimination process, not a creation process) as "evidence" for the theory of evolution.
In the account of Korihor, the Book of Mormon was predicting the coming forth of the theory of evolution, and it exposed a key type of deception used by atheists and evolutionists even today!! Plus the Book of Mormon was rejecting the theory of evolution when it was first published in 1830, almost three decades before Darwin's first book was published in 1859. STUDY ALMA 30 and you will know what satan is really like.
The Book of Mormon was predicting that a doctrine, which HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH CREATING A NEW SPECIES, would be used in the last days as "evidence" for the theory of evolution!!! The sophistication of Alma 30 is amazing and it was written long before Darwin's first book!!!
My key point is that Korihor was struck dumb by a prophet for teaching the theory of evolution!! That should give you an idea of what God thinks about the theory of evolution!!! So should 3 Nephi 29:5-7 which was discussed above.
In summary, while the Book of Mormon was published long before Darwin's first book, it has two references to the theory of evolution, one in Alma 30 and one in 3 Nephi 29!! There is more information about LDS doctrines in the LDS section below, which has a yellow background.
Where Did God Come From?
Let's briefly mention another issue - the Universe. Astronomers believe there are between 100 billion and 200 billion GALAXIES in the Universe.
Our sun is just one of the stars in our Galaxy and our sun is a million times larger than our earth.
The star Betelgeuse has a radius 950-1,200 times the size of our Sun. But the star VY Canis Majoris, a red hypergiant star in the Canis Major constellation, is thought to be 1,540 times the size of our Sun.
If VY Canis Majoris replaced our Sun its size would extend beyond the orbit of Saturn and we would be inside the sun.
The galaxy we live in, called the Milky Way Galaxy, has up to 400 billion stars. The Milky Way Galaxy is in the Laniakea Supercluster of galaxies. In other words, there are many galaxies.
As telescopes in space get bigger and bigger more and more stars and more and more galaxies will be discovered.
Can you imagine what a telescope, with the light-gathering power of the width of our earth, would find!!??
Of course the atheists have to invent a story to claim that our Universe was created by an accident. So they claim there was a giant explosion called the Big Bang which created the Universe. Oh good grief, who would believe our Universe was created by an accidental explosion? If there was a "Big Bang" it was a project of God.
The truth is that God had to exist long before our sun was created and this planet was prepared for earth life. So people naturally want to know where God came from!!
Brigham Young, who was born in 1801 (Darwin was born in 1809), the second prophet of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (the Mormons), said this about the first cause of all things (i.e. where God came from), part of which was mentioned above:
In other words, there was a "First Cause" of all things - a beginning - but this beginning happened so long ago, and so many trillions or quadrillions of things have happened since then, that these events are far beyond human comprehension.
While Brigham Young did not know very much about the Universe in his day, he did understand the principle that the "first cause of all things" is far beyond human comprehension.
By the way, the largest desert on this planet is 5.5 MILLION SQUARE MILES in size (the Antartica Polar Desert)!! The Arctic Polar Desert is 5.4 MILLION SQUARE MILES in size!!
There are a lot of grains of sand on this planet for the ant to count!!
If Brigham Young had known these two facts, and other facts about deserts, I doubt he would have changed his statement.
An Overview Of The Key Issues In The Evolution Debate
Since 4000 B.C. the prophets have been saying that God created all things. Modern science, because of the discovery of DNA in 1953, has proven the prophets have been correct all along.
Darwin, to his credit, had no clue that DNA existed or even that cells existed. Thus Darwin could not tell the difference between macroevolution (i.e. a new species has been created by random accidents) and microevolution (i.e. variety within the same species, such as the difference between a Collie dog and a Great Dane dog and a Chihuahua dog - they are all "dogs" and have exactly the same DNA structure).
Darwin observed microevolution but he could not have known that microevolution has nothing to do with the creation of a new species. It was not until 1953, with the discovery of DNA, that the term "unique species" could be correctly defined to be a "unique DNA structure."
A dog and a cat are different species precisely because their DNA has a different structure!!
Evolution must claim that the DNA structure of one "species" can be randomly mutated into the DNA structure of a new and improved "species." But this is literally like claiming a new and improved computer program could be created by randomly making changes to the binary code of another computer program.
Of course the evolutionists know this is impossible so they use another tactic to deceive people. They claim that there is no difference between microevolution and macroevolution. By doing this they can use examples from microevolution and claim they are true examples of "evolution."
Macroevolution is a false theory because it is impossible to take a highly complex computer program (i.e. the DNA for a species) and mutate it via random accidents (meaning via evolution) into a NEW AND IMPROVED species with a new and improved DNA strand.
But the atheists, such as Richard Dawkins, intentionally obfuscate the terms microevolution and macroevolution in order to get converts. For example, in the book: The Greatest Show On Earth, atheist Richard Dawkins uses example after example of microevolution and claims they are examples of true evolution, which is macroevolution. The entire book is a giant lie because there has never been a proven example of macroevolution.
In short, in 1882, when Darwin died, his theory of evolution was correct BASED ON WHAT DARWIN KNEW AT THE TIME. It could not be disproven until 1953 when DNA was discovered.
But since 1830, which was 29 years BEFORE Darwin's first book, the Latter-Day Saint church (i.e. LDS or Mormons) has been opposed to the theory of evolution. In fact, the LDS church was responsible for the first book to describe Natural Selection and thus evolution, even before Darwin wrote his first book on evolution!!
The Book of Mormon predicted and rejected the theory of evolution in Alma chapter 30. More on that later in the Latter-Day Saint section.
Another topic discussed in an article below is the fact that Natural Selection has absolutely nothing to do with the theory of evolution!! The issue of evolution is not about how animals are DESTROYED by Natural Selection, the issue is how animals are CREATED!!
Destroying animals after they have been created (by Natural Selection) does not explain how these animals were created!! The issue of evolution is the creation of animals and their DNA, not the destruction of animals by Natural Selection. An article below on Natural Selection is called: Can "Natural Selection" Save The Theory of Evolution?
Considering all of the species which exist on this earth, and especially the species which have both a male and female (e.g. humans and deer and turtles); and that for species which have both a male and female, the male and female had to come to exist at about the same time and place on this earth so they could have offspring; and their respective DNA must align in an unbelievably sophisticated way so they could have both male and female offspring; to think that all of the DNA for these many species happened by a series of accidents is ludicrous.
For example, turtles aren't real fast and most of them aren't real big, so how did the first male turtle and first female turtle find each other on this gigantic planet of ours (gigantic from their perspective)? God probably put a few thousand pairs of turtles on this planet in each of several different areas.
Article: The Complexity of Cells (and 3 YouTube Videos)
There is human DNA inside of every cell (except some red blood cells), but human DNA is not the only highly sophisticated object inside the cells. There are many other complex objects, some of which were created by the genes on the DNA. Cells are unbelievably complex!!
I own a book on Cell Biology called Essential Cell Biology, Third Edition, by Alberts, Bray, Hopkin, Johnson, Lewis, Raff, Roberts and Walter. It is a large book with 731 pages!! A section header on page 410 reads: Transmitter-gated Channels in Target Cells Convert Chemical Signals Into Electrical Signals." This is not something you read in the comic section of the newspaper.
Cells could not have been created by a series of accidents!!
For more information about the complexity of cells, see this article:
Article: Could a Simple Cell Exist?
Evolutionists understand the problems with creating a human cell from scratch, so they claim that the "first living cell" was a simple cell and that numerous increasingly complex types of cells "evolved" between the "first living cell" and human cells.
First of all, there are no "simple cells." Even the simplest cell on this earth has DNA (except for some red blood cells, however, there is no way these red blood cells can divide!!) and inside each cell is also an incredible, miniature factory.
For more information about whether a simple cell could exist, see this article:
Article: Can "Natural Selection" Save The Theory of Evolution?
Evolutionists claim that "Natural Selection" will save the theory of evolution!! Natural Selection is considered the "engine that drives evolution." It is the hero of Darwinism.
However, Natural Selection has nothing to do with creating anything. No new species of plant or animal was ever CREATED by Natural Selection!!
Natural Selection can only DESTROY animals after they have already been created.
This article will go into great detail about why Natural Selection has absolutely nothing to do with evolution:
What is Life?
Let us look at the issue: "what is life?" For example, if you took a fish and left it out of the water until it died, and then put it back into the water, why doesn't it come back to life? All of the raw elements for life are still in the fish, so why doesn't it come back to life? There is something more to "life" than just cells and oxygen and water.
Furthermore, have the evolutionists and atheists ever proven that life can be created from non-life (i.e. inorganic materials)?? Never, never, never - yet they continue to preach atheism.
While several attempts have been made to create life from non-life (e.g. Miller-Uray, Wong and Hartgerink), the scientists have not only failed to create life, they have also failed to prove it can be done. They cannot create a DNA strand from inorganic material, much less a DNA strand with a viable permutation of nucleotides for life which is inside of a cell!!
For example, have scientists put a large shell over a pond, which had no life, meaning there was no DNA and no cells (this simulates "prebiotic," meaning "existing before life"), and observed "life" form by a series of accidents, including RNA or DNA inside of a "first living cell" (in that pond), that was alive and had the ability to divide itself into two cells (which would be required for life to continue)?
Then what is their evidence for evolution? Their only evidence is that many scientists do not believe in God and thus they have no choice except to use their God-given brains to deceive people into believing that everything in the Universe, including human DNA, occurred by chance.
But the theory of evolution should have been thrown in the trash can when DNA was discovered and when the complexity of cells was also discovered. Yet, as scientists learn more and more about DNA and cells, the atheists continue to cling to the theory of evolution as if it were still 1859, when Darwin's first book was published.
The only thing that is "evolving" on this planet is the theory of evolution as evolutionists/atheists constantly need to develop new spin to account for the new discoveries about the sophistication of cells, the morphing of the embryo algorithms on DNA, etc.
Article: Comparing DNA to Computer Programs
Ponder this carefully: every one of the millions of complex, or even moderately complex, computer programs on this planet was written by human beings. NONE OF THEM were written by random number generators to simulate the way that evolution must work!!! Every computer program has been written by intelligent human beings who studied computer languages and programming!!
This article logically looks at why DNA could not have come to exist by chance:
Article: Why Do We Need Computer Programmers??
The DNA for more than a million different species are vastly superior to any computer program written by any team of computer programmers!!
So if randomness (i.e. evolution) created all of the most sophisticated computer programs on earth (i.e. DNA) then randomness should also be able to design the far, far less sophisticated computer programs used by businesses, the military, individuals, etc.
This article provides another viewpoint to the evolution debate:
Can Accidents Or Simplicity Create Complexity?
As one example of complexity, the human eyes are unbelievable in complexity. Yet the sections on human DNA which create the human eyes must be far more complex than the eyes themselves!! And the intelligence who designed the DNA (God) must be far more complex than the DNA itself!!
In other words, simplicity never creates complexity. To understand these concepts, consider these items:
First, consider that a human-designed computer program exists because of the human intelligence to write the computer program, the human intelligence to write the computer language, the human intelligence to write the computer language compiler, the human intelligence to design and build the microprocessor, including designing and building the memory chips, etc.
Second, consider the output of the computer program which is printed on a piece of paper.
How can the printout on the piece of paper be more sophisticated than the human intelligence needed to write the computer program, to write the computer language, etc.?? It can't!!
Let's think about the memory chips. I have a son who works for a company that makes memory chips. At times he is sitting in a very large room by himself, with several billion dollars worth of equipment needed to make memory chips!!
The memory chips cannot be more complex than the machines that made them, and the machines that made them cannot be more complex than the humans who designed them!!
Simplicity cannot create complexity!!
Consider the sophistication of DNA such that it creates a person's brain. Let us think about a pianist.
A pianist must be able to convert thousands on dots on a sheet of music into the movements of their fingers!! To do this the DNA must create the nerves between their eyes and their brain, have the brain process these dots and then the brain controls their fingers. And the DNA must create the muscles on their fingers, etc.
If all of this is in place, and with thousands of hours of practice, a pianist can play the Rachmaninoff Piano Concerto #3!!
What created our DNA, which in turn created our brain, had to be far, far smarter than our DNA and our brain!!!
That would be God.
Accidents (i.e. evolution) have zero intelligence so how could it create something with intelligence? It can't!! Intelligence is a top-down process and someone a lot smarter than humans had to design the DNA of every one of the million-plus species on this planet, many of which have a male and female.
Who Were the Parents of the First Human Child Born On This Planet?
The Bible says that Adam and Eve were created by God and that they were the parents of the first children born on this planet.
How does the theory of evolution explain who the parents were of the first human children born on this planet? They claim that the first human children born on this planet were children of bonobos or chimpanzee. But this is impossible because DNA can only be damaged, it cannot be changed. This is because of the way that DNA is constructed.
See the "Seventh" reason in this article to understand why DNA cannot be changed:
Here is an article on the topic of who were the first humans born on this planet:
The Need For Deceptive Definitions
The atheists, and many other evolutionists, know the problems with creating the "first living cell," human DNA, human cells, etc. So what some atheists have done is develop new tools of deception to continue to get converts to atheism.
Their tools of deception frequently revolve around deceptive definitions.
Three of the key terms, which involve deceptive definitions, are: "species," "microevolution" and "macroevolution."
While there are valid definitions for these three terms, the atheists have come up with their own definitions.
Their deceptive definitions for these three terms are so sophisticated, so deceptive and so clever that it takes seven chapters (chapters 10-16) in my free Patterns of Intelligence book, linked to below, to unravel them!! I also have a short article on deceptive definitions called: "Why the Confusion About Evolution?" which is linked to below.
For a quick overview of this article, let us talk about the term "species." With the discovery of DNA the definition of "species" should be: A "unique species" is defined by a "unique DNA structure."
But if the evolutionists defined a "unique species" to be a "unique DNA structure" there would be zero scientific evidence for the theory of evolution!! Scientists have never, never proven a new DNA structure has been created from scratch or from the DNA of a previously existing species!!
So some atheists have developed various deceptive definitions for the term "species."
For example, to generate "evidence" for evolution they use every excuse in the world for not being able to come up with a credible definition of the term "species!!" Instead of using DNA, they define the term "species" by talking about typology (i.e. grouping species by how similar they look to the observer) or phylogeny (i.e. the phylogenetic tree of Darwin)!!
Why not use a "unique DNA structure" to define a "unique species?" Because that would destroy the theory of evolution overnight.
Whenever you see any "evidence" for the theory of evolution, it is based on very bad science and/or highly deceptive definitions. The theory of evolution is so blatantly absurd (because of the discovery of DNA and the complexity of cells) that the atheists have no choice except to use multiple forms of deception.
Article: What Did Darwin Know?
Charles Darwin knew nothing about cells and he knew nothing about the DNA inside of those cells. In fact, based on what scientists knew in Darwin's day, the data that Darwin had access to fully supported his theory of evolution!! It was not until 1953, with the discovery of DNA, that Darwin's theories could be disproven!!
This article is actually in defense of Darwin based on what scientists knew in his day!!
A Summary and Overview Of Some Key Issues
If scientists are so smart, and believe that God does not exist, can they create a Universe with a planet like Earth that has more than a million species, many of which have both a male and female? Let's think about it.
What is the difference between "creating" a brand new Buick versus "destroying" a brand new Buick by driving it over a cliff??
The difference is that the new Buick being driven off the cliff must have been created before it was driven over a cliff.
How does driving a Buick over a cliff help explain how the Buick got created in the first place?? It doesn't.
So how does finding the remains of an extinct animal (i.e. its fossil) tell us how it was created?? It doesn't. All it tells us is that this animal used to be alive, but now it is dead.
An animal must be alive before it is dead. A fossil does not tell us how an animal was created, it only tells us that the animal is dead.
But even extinct animals had to have DNA and their DNA had to create them either from an enclosed egg (e.g. a chicken egg) or a fertilized egg (e.g. humans or monkeys).
Every animal on this planet, including humans, came from a single DNA strand which was inside of an egg. Whether they came from an enclosed egg (i.e. a chicken egg) or a single fertilized egg in a mother, the animal (including humans) came from a single object and then morphed over time into what it was when it was young and eventually died.
So the evolution debate is not about where bones came from, it is about where DNA came from. How did "morphing of the embryo" algorithms come to exist for many, many complex species, especially when there is a male and female in the species?
The evolution debate is therefore about statistics. There are so many past and present highly sophisticated DNA strands for both extinct and living animals that the theory of evolution has become ludicrous.
But it is not just about the creation of DNA, it is also about viable permutations of nucleotides on DNA. Even if DNA could be built, the probability it has a viable permutation to create an animal from a single cell is mathematically insane.
It is far beyond the scope of this home page to talk about many subjects. But trust me: the probability of a viable permutation of nucleotides, to create both a male and female for a single advanced species (the permutation of nucleotides on the DNA would have to be almost perfect in order to perform the morphing of the embryo for both a male and female offspring), etc. is so ludicrous it could not happen a single time in the estimated age of this Universe or a billion consecutive Universes.
In summary, here are just a few reasons evolution (i.e. accidents) could never have created human beings:
But even if scientists could create a cell from scratch, would their "new cell" be alive? The answer is 'no' because scientists don't have a clue what "life" really is.
So how did evolution create a living cell, with DNA or RNA inside, with a viable permutation, with the mechanisms to use the DNA patterns, by pure accident?? Accidents don't create intelligence, just ask any computer programmer how long it would take to write a complex computer program using code written exclusively by random number generators. It would never happen.
So if humans cannot design and create from scratch DNA or RNA, plus a cell for the DNA or RNA to exist inside, and give their new cell "life," with a viable permutation of nucleotides, why would anyone believe that a series of pure accidents (i.e. evolution) could have created the "first living cell" in a sterile pond?
The atheists and evolutionists are great story tellers but they are complete dolts at having a credible explanation of where everything came from.
The Evolution Debate
While there are more than 350 books which are favorable to the theory of evolution there are also more than 350 books which are strongly critical of the theory of evolution!!
There are also many YouTube videos on both sides of the debate.
Those who are critical of the theory of evolution are called "creation scientists" or "creationists" because they believe the scientific data favors a "Creator" of the Universe.
In fact, if you want to get published in a leading biology journal you better be an atheist and your article better support the theory of evolution. If it does not praise evolution your article will end up in the trash can, not in a "science" journal.
From the incomprehensible sophistication of DNA, to the amazing complexity of cells, to the earth we live on, to the ends of the Milky Way Galaxy, to the furthest galaxy cluster and supercluster (by the way, the supercluster we live in is called the Laniakea Supercluster), and considering the "constants" in physics (e.g. the gravitational constant); the credibility of the theory of evolution has dropped to ABSOLUTE ZERO!!!
Genes and Evolution (Advanced)
Here is another problem evolutionists have in defending the theory of evolution. There are about 20,000 genes on human DNA. Each must be "expressed" (i.e. turned on) or "not expressed" (i.e. turned off). The information to turn a gene on or off, for each cell, must come from within that cell.
But every cell has the same DNA!! So why do different cells have different combinations of genes turned on or off??
Multiply 20,000 genes (which are expressed differently in different types of cells), by 30 billion cells in a newborn baby, and the resulting number is far larger than the 3.2 billion nucleotides on DNA. The number is 600 trillion genes!!
This means that for each nucleotide on the DNA strand (and every cell has the same DNA strand), there are 187,500 genes (600 trillion genes divided by 3.2 billion nucleotides) which need to be expressed or not expressed!!
In other words, 600 trillion genes, in the cells of the newborn baby, need to know whether to be activated/expressed or not. But there are only 3.2 billion nucleotides on the DNA in each cell to tell them whether to be expressed or not expressed and each cell has exactly the same DNA!!
How does the DNA in each cell know which genes to activate for that cell as the baby is growing from a single fertilized egg and the cells are dividing??
Remember, a human being starts out as one cell (the fertilized egg) which has a single DNA strand with 3.2 billion nucleotides on it and then this cell starts dividing. Every cell in a human being has exactly the same DNA (technically some red blood cells do not have DNA).
No new information can be added during the morphing of the embryo process because nothing from outside the new baby is integrated into the baby other than milk and food.
So how can each nucleotide on DNA, which has one of four states (A, C, G or T) control the expression of 187,500 genes?? It can't!! And remember, the DNA also needs the information to control the morphing of the embryo!!
Here is another issue. When the cell needs an enzyme it has to find the gene that has the pattern to create that enzyme. So how does the cell FIND the correct gene, meaning how does it find the first nucleotide of the gene (on the DNA strand) and how does it find the last nucleotide of the gene (on the DNA strand)?? The cell has ways, but they are not fully understood.
Simply put, there is not enough information on DNA to control all of the activities that are going on as the baby is being created!!
And even if there was enough information via compression algorithms, the algorithms on DNA would have to be so sophisticated and incomprehensible that they could not have come to exist by a series of accidents!!
Why don't most biology textbooks talk about these and many other problems with the theory of evolution? Because they want to pretend the theory of evolution is true and sell books!!
A Challenge To The Atheists and Evolutionists
The atheists and evolutionists claim that all DNA can be created by a series of accidents either from scratch or by the modification of an existing DNA strand.
This article poses a challenge to the atheists and evolutionist to prove their theories are credible:
Evolution After The "First Living Cell"
Evolutionists claim that the DNA of the first human male and the DNA of the first human female "evolved" independently over millions of years, from the same "first living cell," by a series of accidents called "evolution"!!!
How did the DNA of the first human father and the DNA of the first human mother "evolve" together from the "first living cell?" How was their DNA synchronized, species after slightly improved species, as the DNA of the males and females evolved independently for millions of years??
Here is the problem, suppose the male DNA evolved slightly faster than the female DNA evolved. Within thousands of years their DNA would not align and they would not have been able to have any children that survived because their DNA was not compatible!!
Male DNA and female DNA had to be designed by the same person at the same time - God. Evolution could never have designed two massively sophisticated computer programs (DNA) that could be integrated together to create a third computer program (a baby). And evolution certainly could not have done it in the same time-frame and same locations on the earth.
Yet the atheists claim that evolution created male and female DNA for many species that have both a male and female. They must claim the male and female DNA "evolved" over the same time period (so they could mate as they slowly evolved over many generations) and they had to live in the same geographical area (also required so they could mate).
But the truth is that it does not matter what is discovered in cell biology, DNA analysis, etc. because no matter what is discovered, the atheists will either ignore it or give evolution the credit!!
The evolution debate is not about science, it is about God. If you assume God does not exist, or if you believe God does not exist, you will likely believe in the theory of evolution no matter how absurd it is.
Unfortunately, many people who believed in God have been tricked into believing in evolution. In fact, that is the precise purpose of the highly sophisticated deceptions of the theory of evolution (and I have only talked about a few of their deceptions) and why it is taught in most schools, but not all schools. In some schools, "creation science" or "intelligent design" is taught and in other schools there are disclaimers about evolution.
Biology is no longer about science, it is about creative thinking as to how every discovery can be attributed to the theory of evolution in order to get more converts to atheism.
So let's talk about the two free eBooks that are on this website.
Chapter Summary Medium-size eBook (37 pages, pdf file): Patterns of Intelligence - Chapter Summary
If you want a quick, high level overview of the Patterns of Intelligence book, this article has a short summary of each chapter in the 266 page medium-size this book:
Technical Medium-size eBook (266 pages, pdf file): Patterns of Intelligence
While the large book on this website is the "B-2 Bomber" of anti-evolution books, this book is the "F-22 Raptor" of anti-evolution books. This free book is actually much more current on the issues of the great scientific deceptions which are going on and the mathematical reasons evolution cannot be true. However, it does not go into the depth of the long book on the mathematical reasons evolution cannot be true.
Did you know that if you listed all major LDS doctrines (i.e. Latter-Day Saint or Mormon) and then took the opposite of each of these doctrines you would end up with the theory of evolution doctrines!! This book will produce such a detailed list in Chapter 2.
In this book you will see one of the main arguments of the large book, called "Patterns of Intelligence." This eBook has some really cool graphs.
But there are many things in the medium size book which are not in the large book. For example, chapters 22 and 23 of this book contain an amazing discussion which demonstrates that there is no where near enough information on DNA to control the "morphing of the embryo" algorithms!! Either God Himself designed DNA (and we cannot even remotely understand it) or the morphing of the embryo has help from the other side of the veil. There is no other option!!
Here is a link to the medium-sized book in one file. As always, you are welcome to read it online, download it, or print it out:
Here is a link to the individual chapters in the medium-sized book. Each chapter is a file so it is easy to focus on one chapter at a time:
Technical Long eBook (407 pages, pdf file): Prophets or Evolution - An LDS Perspective
This book is the "B-2 Bomber" of anti-evolution books. It demolishes the theory of evolution time after time and takes no enemies. The discovery of DNA has created an avalanche of ways to prove the theory of evolution is scientific nonsense.
This free eBook is available in both HTML and PDF formats and both versions can be looked at online or can be downloaded. For example, you can download the PDF version and print it out so you can mark it up. As always, you don't even need to tell me you downloaded it!!
The long eBook is called "Prophets or Evolution - An LDS Perspective," which:
The book in HTML format (by chapter):
A printable version of the entire book (407 pages) is available in pdf format and can be read or downloaded from this link. It can also be printed out:
A Chapter of the Long Book: "Seven Scientific Reasons ... Evolution Cannot be True"
The complete "Prophets or Evolution" book is over 400 pages. This is a link to one of the key chapters in the main eBook. This chapter is a high level overview of seven of the main scientific reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true. It also mentions seven other reasons evolution cannot be true. Here is a link to this chapter:
Other Anti-Evolution BooksIf you listen to the propaganda of the pro-evolution monopoly you might think that anyone who believes in creation science is a dolt. Nothing could be further from the truth. There are many "creation scientists" (i.e. those who believe God created this Universe) who are brilliant and have no problems seeing through the false science generated by the scientific establishment.
In fact, many anti-evolution books have been written by brilliant scientists. This listing of anti-evolution books and DVDs contains only a small sampling of the anti-evolution books which exist in print. In fact, there are more than 200 anti-evolution books.
Many of the books were written by PhDs in the sciences. The arguments in these books totally shred the theory of evolution from a scientific standpoint.
Some of these books may be out of print and you may have to use a book finder, such as Alibris, to find them.
Here is a link to this appendix:
Additional Section For Latter-Day Saints (LDS or Mormon) And/Or The General Public
NOTE: Not all links below are to this website.
If you live in Utah, Idaho, Nevada, Arizona, Wyoming or New Mexico, please do me a favor. Have one of your children (or you) find out the name and authors of the biology textbook which is being used in their high school. Then send me the city and state, and the name of the book(s) along with the names of the authors. The authors names are important because many biology books have the same title, such as "Biology." I need to know what is actually being taught in these states for future reference.
Also, if you could find out whether this book is used statewide or whether each school district gets to pick their own textbook on Biology.
My email address is at the bottom of this page. Thanks In Advance!!
The rest of this section for Latter-Day Saints provides key information for the youth and adults.
Article: The First Book To Describe Evolution Was NOT Written By Darwin!!!
What was the first book on this planet to describe the theory of evolution?
Hint: the first book to describe the theory of evolution was not written by Darwin!!
The first book to describe the theory of evolution was the Book of Mormon, which was published in 1830, which was 29 years before Darwin wrote his first book. It was obviously not a prophet who taught these doctrines.
The theory of evolution is PREDICTED in two places in the Book of Mormon: Alma 30 and 3 Nephi 29:5-7. The versus in 3 Nephi, especially verse 7, seem to apply to Richard Dawkins and others who publish books for gain which are critical of anyone who believes in God or Christ or in some cases the miracles of Christ. There are hundreds of such books!!
In Alma chapter 30, an "anti-Christ" was taught his doctrines by a personal appearance of the devil. His name was Korihor (see Alma 30 in the Book of Mormon).
Korihor had several unique characteristics:
In 1830, the Book of Mormon was predicting the coming forth of the theory of evolution and it was also rejecting the theory of evolution, almost three decades before Darwin wrote his first book!!
Many times since 1830, the leaders of the Mormon church have voiced strong criticism of the theory of evolution, even though the theory of evolution could not be disproven until 1953. Current church leaders who have been openly critical of the theory of evolution include Elder Jeffrey R. Holland (while speaking at BYU) and current president of the Quorum of the Twelve, President Russell M. Nelson.
This short article will explain in detail that The Book of Mormon, which was published in 1830 (29 years before Darwin's first book), explained the theory of evolution in detail:
Article: Where Did God Come From?
So if many Christian churches, including the Mormon/LDS church, claim that God created all species, it is perfectly fair to ask: Where did God come from?
While no one knows the full answer to this question, this article will dig into the subject based on what we have been told by the prophets, both ancient and modern.
Article: Prophetic Book of Mormon Warnings
This short article goes into more detail about prophets and evolution than what I just mentioned. However, if you plan on reading the Patterns of Intelligence book mentioned below, which is over 260 pages long, it is not necessary to read this article.
Spreadsheet: Alma 30: Doctrines of Korihor and Evolution
As a support to the above article, this spreadsheet shows the vast differences between what Korihor taught (i.e. what evolution teaches) and LDS doctrine. This spreadsheet goes verse by verse in Alma chapter 30 and explains the similarities between the teachings of Korihor and the doctrines of the theory of evolution. It also shows how each is the opposite of LDS doctrine:
Article: The War In Heaven Comes to Earth (Bible and LDS)
Before Adam and Eve were put on this earth there was a war in heaven between the forces of Christ and the forces of Lucifer, who would later become "the devil."
This article goes into detail about the war in heaven that determined who would be born on this planet and who would not!!
Semi-Technical Article (14 pages): Why The Confusion About Evolution?
The intentional deceptions of evolutionists, by the use of clever terminology, are why there is such a wide diversity of opinions about evolution among LDS scientists. Very few members of the church understand the sophistication of the deceptions of the scientific establishment.
While these discussions are also in the Patterns of Intelligence book, if you want a quick lesson in understanding the deceptive definitions used by the scientific establishment, this article is for you.
Statement: The 1909 Official Statement of the First Presidency of the LDS Church
The 1909 statement of the First Presidency on the theory of evolution remains the official document of the church on the theory of evolution. This statement in 1909 was reprinted in the 2002 Ensign. It remains not only the official doctrine of the church, but the best description of the origin of man outside of the scriptures!! It is highly, highly recommended to the reader to study this document very carefully!!! It is unlike anything else you can read on the subject of evolution!!
Here is a link to this magnificent article:
Here is a 14 page article with my comments about the 1909 and 1910 statements of the First Presidency. My comments focus of the relationship between the statements of the First Presidency and what scientists knew between 1909 and 1953:
Booklet: True To the Faith (First Presidency)
In addition to the 1909 article, an official booklet issued by the First Presidency in 2004: True to the Faith - A Gospel Reference, while not specifically about evolution, describes church doctrines which are the very antithesis of the doctrines of the theory of evolution (e.g. See topics: Atonement of Jesus Christ; Creation; Fall; God the Father; etc.). This booklet is available on www.lds.org:
The Nature of God!! (Talks by Elder Jeffrey L. Holland)
What kind of being is God?? To those who fear they may have sinned beyond the range of the atonement, there is a magnificent message in this general conference talk about the true nature of God!!
In this conference talk Elder Holland gives us a feel for the love of God towards us.
The Prophetic Future of the LDS Church (Talk by President Spencer W. Kimball)
Do you want to know the future of the LDS church? A general conference talk by President Spencer W. Kimball provides a clear vision of what the future of the LDS church will be.
The False Gods We Worship (Article by President Spencer W. Kimball)
This classic article by President Spencer W. Kimball explains about the false gods some members of the church (and to some degree all of us) worship. Its lesson applies directly to the youth of the church!!
Beware of the Evil Behind the Smiling Eyes (Talk by Elder Neil L. Anderson)
Many attempts to lead the youth of the church astray are made by those who appear to be harmless or even friendly. This talk by Elder Neil L. Anderson, of the Quorum of the Twelve, is a warning to the youth of the church about those with "smiling eyes" who are not who they claim to be.
Quotes: The Power of God and the Future of the Church
These two articles contains quotes from the scriptures and from the living prophets and apostles about the power of God, the future of the LDS church and the final triumph of good over evil.
The Role and Importance of the LDS Church President
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints is led by a "living prophet." This article is designed to clarify the role and importance of the President of the LDS church. It is mostly quotes of several prominent church leaders about the role and importance of the LDS church President.
Quotes About Church Membership
These are quotes about membership in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. The quotes come from the prophets and apostles.
Website: Quotes of LDS Prophets and Apostles
This website has quotes from all of the Presidents of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and many of the Apostles of the church. There are many very powerful quotes on this website.
Video: Creation and Evolution - A Witness of Prophets
This is an outstanding video dealing with the theory of evolution, and especially the quotes of living prophets regarding the theory of evolution.
The official position of the LDS church on the theory of evolution is made very clear in this video!! Many quotes of presidents of the church and modern apostles are presented.
This video is highly recommended for anyone who wonders how the church leaders feel about Darwin and his theory of evolution.
To Obtain a Copy, Visit:
Other LDS Websites on Evolution
This is a web page that links to other websites which discuss LDS doctrine versus the theory of evolution:
Here is an old version of the "Patterns of Intelligence" book:
To Learn More About the LDS Church
Here is a website that has many quotes by many of the apostles and prophets of the LDS church, on a variety of topics:
Even though the LDS Church officially rejects the theory of evolution (see the 1909 Statement, linked to above, and the Book of Mormon, Alma chapter 30, among many other documents), no book or article which is involved in scientific debates or which discusses the scientific issues of the theory of evolution, even if it strongly supports official church doctrine, is endorsed by the LDS church unless it is part of an official church publication.
The gospel deals with eternal and unchanging truths but all of the fields of science constantly change as new discoveries are made. Thus, the church does not establish any scientific claim as being absolute.
As a result, the books and articles written by R. Webster Kehr represent the opinions of the author and are too scientific to be published or endorsed by the LDS church.
About The Author, R. Webster Kehr
This website is a product of R. Webster Kehr, who lives in Missouri. I have two college degrees from Brigham Young University: a B.S. in mathematics (1972) and a B.S. in accounting (1974).
I am a retired cancer researcher (of natural medicine) and before retiring I worked with thousands of cancer patients. I wrote almost all of the articles on the www.cancertutor.com website. It turns out that natural cancer treatments are far, far more effective than orthodox cancer treatments. The www.cancertutor.com website is a great resource for all cancer patients.
My wife Marit, who died May 7, 2016, was from Norway. We met in Provo, Utah a month before I left on my mission to California (back then there were 3 missions in California, now there are more than 20 missions in California). She was a genealogist and we have seven children and 20 grandchildren, scattered from Idaho to South Carolina.
My email address is below. Whether you have a question or a comment, please feel free to email me. I love to communicate with students about the theory of evolution.
Don't forget to email all of your friends about this website!!
(My email address is camouflaged to avoid web crawlers)
Note: Due to changes in search engine algorithms, this area is reserved for additional keywords:|
This website is primarily about Prophets versus Evolution, meaning Evolution versus Prophets.
This is an intelligent Design article for Mormons or Latter-Day Saints.
And this manuscript also deals with Prophets versus Darwin, meaning Darwin versus Prophets.
It includes detailed discussions about Prophets or Evolution in addition to Evolution or Prophets.
This website discusses in detail the topic of intelligent design for Mormonism.
Included are large dicussions about Mormonism versus Evolution, and furthermore Evolution versus Mormonism.
Creation Scientists forget that God without Living Prophets is like mashed potatoes without gravy.
Intense discussions and debates about Mormonism or Evolution as opposed to Evolution or Mormonism are part of this website.
This LDS website, loyal to LDS doctrines, is mainly about Mormons versus Darwin, meaning Darwin versus Mormons.
This LDS website, by a member, is about Mormons versus Evolution, meaning Evolution versus Mormons.
These free articles and books are clearly and intentionally about intelligent Design website for Mormons.
This site also includes long discussions regarding Mormonism versus Darwin, plus Darwin versus Mormonism.
This website about living prophets and evolution does not forget to discuss Mormonism or Intelligent Design.
The details do not exclude the issues of Prophets or Darwin in addition to Darwin or Prophets.
This website definitely is mainly about Mormons or Darwin and not incidentally about Darwin or Mormons.
It intentionally includes discussions about Mormons or Evolution and not accidentally about Evolution or Mormons.
This website carefully includes the important topic of intelligent design and Mormonism.
There is no doubt that this website is an intelligent Design for Latter-Day Saints or Mormons website.
Creation Scientists remember to talk about God, but they forget to talk about living prophets.
What good is God without Living Prophets to lead the people of God? But it is primarily about Mormonism or Darwin as opposed to Darwin or Mormonism.
This prophets or evolution website includes chapters and discussions about Mormonism and Intelligent Design.
There is no doubt at all that this website is inclusive of intelligent Design for Mormons.