|
What Is The Theory of Evolution And Why Does It Exist???While the theory of evolution debate appears to be about science, such as where did DNA, cells, cell divisions, galaxies, Quasars, etc. come from!!! THAT IS NOT WHY THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION EXISTS!!! The theory of evolution exists to convince people that there is no God. For example: are all humans descended from Adam and Eve (whose cells, bodies and "life" were created by God) or did all humans "evolve" from a lesser primate, such as bonobos or chimpanzees or monkeys???
It is critical to understand that the leaders of the theory of evolution movement, such as Richard Dawkins, have a goal: But many atheists and evolutionists go beyond these things; they mock anyone who claims that Jesus Christ performed any miracles. In short, there is absolutely zero difference between the theory of evolution and atheism!!! They both have exactly the same goal, to claim that Heavenly Father and the Holy Ghost do not exist, that Adam and Eve never existed and that Christ (who no one can claim did not exist) did not perform any miracles. After spending more than 50 years as a member of the LDS church (i.e. The Church Of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints or "Mormons") I can tell you that all three Gods in the Godhead are very much alive and well!!! And as I will demonstrate many times on this website: WOW ARE THEY SMART!!! Let us dig deep into the very specific target of the theory of evolution!!!!
More On Why The Theory Of Evolution ExistsHere is a profound quote about the real target of the theory of evolution by the late Brigham Young University (BYU) scholar Robert J. Matthews (who died in 2009) in his, "Origin of Man: The Doctrinal Framework" (the next paragraph has a blue link to his entire article):
Read that paragraph two or three times!!! Latter-Day Saints should pay close attention to the last two paragraphs of his article because they will understtand them!!! Did you notice the phrase: "more than with any other"!!! In other words, satan's perfect doctrine is the theory of evolution!!! While the theory of evolution automatically denounces that Heavenly Father and the Holy Ghost exist, THE REAL TARGET of the theory of evolution is the divinity of the Savior Jesus Christ!!! This battle goes back to the Grand Council (which occurred before Adam and Eve were put on this planet) which I talk about from time to time. Professor Matthews' statement hits at the very core of the evolution debate and it is razor sharp in accuracy. Professor Matthews made it very, very clear that the theory of evolution was DESIGNED to try and destroy a belief that Jesus Christ was and still is and always will be a member of the Godhead and that He is the one and only Savior of the world!!! Professor Matthews was absolutely correct, the theory of evolution is a tool to convince people that there are no Gods and thus no Godhead!!! And you thought the theory of evolution debate was about science!!! Not A Chance!!! The atheists and evolutionists cannot claim that Christ did not exist, because of the Bible and many other ancient documents other than the Bible which talk about Him. They can only claim that Christ did not perform any miracles. The tactic to claim that Christ did not perform any miracles is exactly what the Book of Mormon predicted would happen in the last days!!! More on this in a moment. While science is the evolution debate field the goal of the theory of evolution is to convince people that the three members of the Godhead do not exist or in the case of Christ (who no one can deny existed because of the Bible and many other ancient documents such as by Josephus and Pliny The Younger) that He did not perform any miracles!!! When schools teach the theory of evolution they are teaching really, really, really, really horrible "science", which is the primary purpose of this website to expose, and they are teaching the religion of atheism in their classes!!!
More About The Scriptures And The Theory Of Evolution
The Bible is not the only book which was written by ancient prophets of God. The Book of Mormon is a book like the Bible, in that it was written by ancient prophets, but in the case of the Book of Mormon most of the prophets who wrote the Book of Mormon lived in the Americas!!! The last prophet buried the gold plates they wrote on in 421 A.D.. The gold plates the Book of Mormon was written on were translated by the prophet Joseph Smith and was first published in 1830, which was 29 years before Darwin's first book on evolution was published in 1859!!! Well, not all of the gold plates were translated. The Book of Mormon, as I mention from time to time, predicted the coming forth of the theory of evolution in multiple places, though the word "evolution" did not exist in 1830 or anciently. In the Book of Mormon the prophet Nephi (the Nephi who wrote 3 Nephi and lived in the fourth century A.D.), knew even back then that some atheists and evolutionists today would claim (for profit) that Christ, who the atheists and evolutionists cannot deny existed because of many ancient records, in addition to the Bible, did not perform any miracles!!! Here are the versus (pay close attention to verse 7):
I emphasize the phrase to get gain so that many people (such as high shool Biology teachers) will not worry about fitting into the category of "like unto the Son of Perdition"!!! The versus are for people who get paid to write books, get paid to give lectures or get paid to participate in debates. In my opinion, only several hundred people who are alive today even need to worry about fitting into that category. You can also see these versus online: We don't know anything about the "like unto the son of perdition" punishment, but take my advice: a person should not set as a goal to become: like unto the son of perdition!!! The key tactic of these people is to mock anyone who believes in Heavenly Father and the divinity of Christ FOR PROFIT!!!
If you want even more evidence that Christ was a real person, see this article which goes into much more detail about evidences that Christ was a real person (this article will also be mentioned below): The theory of evolution is not a passive doctrine, many of the atheists and evolutionists are very proactive in trying to get people to believe there are no Gods!!! The primary purpose of this website is to provide massive scientific evidence that the three members of the Godhead are very much alive and well, and WOW!!! are they smart!!!! You will see evidence of God's intelligence (i.e. meaning all of the members of the Godhead, but especially Heavenly Father) over and over and over again on this website!!! Part of the history of the relationship between Christ (i.e. Jehovah) and Lucifer (i.e. satan) began even before Adam and Eve were put on this earth and is described in my article on the Grand Council which I will link to below. You were there, and you voted for Christ (or you would not have a physical body - ever), but you do not remember this meeting because it would interfere with your free agency to remember the pre-birth spirit world!!!l It is important that I mention that there are living prophets today who lead the members of The Church Of Jesus Christ Of Latter-Day Saints. In fact, I have a different website on this topic which I link to from time to time.
More Scriptures, Some From The Bible, About The Divinity Of Christ And What God Thinks Of Some Of The Atheists/EvolutionistsEven during the life of Christ, converting people away from the mission and doctrines of Christ (which is essentially what the theory of evolution was designed to do) was not appreciated by God. Here are quotes from the Bible (Christ was speaking to the people in His day, but what He said applies today just as well!!): Matthew 10:33: "33 But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father which is in heaven."
That is a warning from a member of the Godhead!!! Here is the original source: Note that no one that He was talking to could deny that Christ existed because Christ was talking to them!!! So they could only deny His divinity. Here is another example from Matthew: Matthew 18:6-7: "6 But whoso shall offend one of these little one's which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea. 7 Woe unto the world because of offences! for it must needs be that offences come; but woe to that man by whom the offence cometh!
Here is the original source:
The Book of Mormon is just as straightforward as the Bible!!! Well, the Book of Mormon is stronger at describing punishments!! The Book of Mormon talks about a punishment called: "like unto the son of perdition" (3 Nephi 29:4-7). There are very specific criteria for that punishment that I talk about in other places (pay close attention to the phrase "like unto the Son of Perdition"): Even though the "like unto the son of perdition" category is likely a subcategory of the Telestial Kingdom, any punishment with the words "son of perdition" as part of the category is not something that someone should set as a goal to achieve!!! Verse 7 in the Book of Mormon (in 3 Nephi 29) is an amazing verse because the prophet Nephi knew that the people in the last days would have many evidences that Christ existed so he knew that the wicked people in the last days could only criticize the claims of the miracles of Christ!!!
This is an article about why verses 4-7 are amazing in the way they were written (IMPORTANT NOTE: this article has links to other websites which list many ancient documents [other than the Bible] which talk about Christ being a real person):
Well, it gets worse. Here is a reference in the Old Testament for the phrase: "Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!":
In the Book of Mormon, the Book of Mormon is quoting the chapter in Isaiah that I just mentioned (the Book of Mormon quotes several chapters from Isaiah):
See also: 2 Timothy 5:20: So let's start our scientific discussion at the beginning: what does the word "evolution" really mean??? It does not mean what you think it means!!
What Does The Word "Evolution" Really Mean???The goal and purpose of the atheists and evolutionists who push the theory of evolution can be summarized thusly: their goal is to convince people that there is no God and that Adam and Eve and Noah and his wife never existed!! The atheists and evolutionists claim that all animals were created by "evolution," meaning every animal "evolved" from a prior, less sophisticated species. For example, they may say that humans "evolved" from bonobos or chimpanzees or monkeys or some other primate. They say this because they want people to believe there is no God and that Adam and Eve never existed. But there is a major problem with the theory of evolution. The word "evolution" does not represent a tangible object or a physical force that can create things!! Evolution is only a claim or belief that there is no God. Theories and beliefs only exist inside of people's brains, they cannot create physical things, much less create physical things intelligently!!! Only tangible things can create other tangible things!!! Let me repeat that: Only tangible things can create other tangible things!!! Get that through your head: Only tangible things can create other tangible things!!! To say that "humans evolved from bonobos" (or any other pimate) does not describe a tangible object or a physical force (much less an intelligent physical force), it only describes a belief that there is no God. "Evolution" and imaginary processes are not tangible and they are not a force in nature such as gravity or wind or sunlight!! "Evolution" does not have a skull or a brain or eyes or ears or legs or a heart!!!
See this excellent webpage on the Types of Forces (search for the word "evolution" - you won't find it): Note that the word "evolution" does not appear on that page, nor should it appear!!!
Let Us Start With The Scientific Issues Related To The Theory Of EvolutionIt is generally accepted that there have been ten million animal species on this planet, nine million of which are extinct!!! It takes four new DNA strands to create a new species (as I talk about from time to time). So it took 40,000,000 highly sophisticated DNA strands to create the ten million animal species with have been or currently are on this planet!!! Only God could have done that considering that scientists do not fully understand a single one of these 40,000,000 DNA strands, even if they had access to all of them!!! Yet the atheists/evolutionists claim that the imaginary evolution created and sequenced the nucleoetides on forty-million massively sophisticated DNA strands, not a single one of which is fully understood by scientists (even if they had access to all of them)!!! Human beings cannot sequence the nucleotides for a mouse (without cheating), must less the DNA for humans!! Yet these same atheists and evolutionists claim that Donald Duck (i.e. imaginary evolution) created and sequenced the DNA and cells for ten million animal species, one million of which are alive today. And human scientists today do not have the slightest clue how any one of these 40,000,000 DNA strands came to exist or what they are used for!!! Well, they do know a little about DNA, such as genes. To make it even worse for evolution - there is zero evidence of failures in the process of creating these 40,000,000 DNA strands!!! Do you think that the imaginary Mickey Mouse could create 40,000,000 DNA strands without making any errors!!!!! All of these animals had to be created before most of them went extinct!!! Let's start talking about cells. It took the construction of about two billion different kinds of highly sophisticated cell types to create these ten million animal species!!! Both new DNA and new cell types were needed to create these ten million animal species!!! I also talk about the location of the many cell types (the locations in the bodies of the animals of these cell types) from time to time. Would you be surprised that even though there are many very smart people who have a PhD in Cell Biology or Microbiology, that even if these scientists had access to all two billion of these kinds of cells, these scientists would not completely understand a single one of them!!! And, of course, there is no scientific evidence that there are errors in creating these types of cells. So "evolution" (e.g. which is no more real than Superman), which does not exist, must be billions and billions of times smarter than human beings!!! All of this is nonsense, the word "evolution" is nothing more than a claim or belief that there is no God!! That's it!!! Evolution is not a physical object or a force that can do things, much less do things intelligently (such as sequence the nucleotides on any DNA strand)!! Humans did not "evolve" from other primates any more than humans "evolved" from Donald Duck or Superman because both Donald Duck and Superman and "evolution" are all imaginary things!!! Only tangible things can create other tangible things and "evolution" is not tangible, it is only a belief!!!! Let me repeat that last sentence: Only tangible things can create other tangible things and "evolution" is not tangible, it is only a belief!!!! "Evolution" has no eyes to see, no arms to create cells or DNA, it has no legs to travel, and above all evolution has no brain to design and intelligently sequence the nucleotides on any DNA strand, nor can it create any of the roughly two billion different types of cells which were needed for the creation of one million species of animals currently on this planet, and the roughly nine million extinct animal species, all of which have or had both males and females whose DNA have or had to align in an incredibly precise way and they all have or had unique sets of highly sophisticated cells!!!
How can I make the "evolution" debate any more clear!!!!!! Superman, the tooth fairy, the flying spaghetti monster, the theory of evolution , Mickey Mouse, Donald Duck, etc. are all exactly the same thing - a non-tangible make-believe fantasy!!! Please explain to me why Donald Duck cannot create and inteligently sequence a single physical DNA strand but "evolution" can create and intelligently sequence 40 million physical DNA strands and two billion types of cells!!! None of the above fantasies can pick up a deck of cards, cook a dinner or design, create and sequence a single DNA strand!!! Donald Duck would be far smarter than "evolution" because Donald Duck has an imaginary brain, but "evolution" doesn't even have an imaginary brain!!! In fact, every time you hear or see the word "evolution" substitute the word "evolution" with the words "Donald Duck." Donald Duck could create and sequence the nucleotides on a new DNA strand, for a new species, just as well as evolution could!!! They are both purely imaginary!! But Donald Duck was smarter because he could talk in English!!! Let us look at this another way: DNA is a physical object (i.e. a tangible object) therefore only physical objects can create or sequence or resequence a DNA strand because a DNA strand is a physical object!!! Let me say that again: Let us look at this another way: DNA is a physical object (i.e. a tangible object) therefore only physical objects can create or sequence or resequence a DNA strand because a DNA strand is a physical object!!! Ditto for cells. In summary, no animal species on this planet has ever evolved from another animal species because "evolution" is nothing more than a Superman comic book!!!
Mindless, Brainless, Directionless AccidentsSo if there is no God, as claimed by the atheists/evolutionists, and if "evolution" has the same imaginary physical features as Superman, Batman and Robin, then what would be the force in nature that created human DNA and the DNA for all other species??? The atheists and evolutionists have no choice except to claim that the Universe, cells, DNA, DNA sequences, etc. were all created by UNINTENTIONAL, DIRECTIONLESS, PURPOSELESS, MINDLESS, BRAINLESS ACCIDENTS!!! However, the atheists and evolutionists will never use the term "accidents" because they know that no one would believe them if they used the correct word "accidents" instead of the imaginary word "evolution"!!! Here is the key: nowhere in all of science, except the theory of evolution, is it claimed that random accidents ever created anything that was complex, functional and highly sophisticated. And evolution claims it has happened billions of times (including the creation of unique cell types) with very few, if any, errors!! "Accidents" have no brains!!! Well, neither does Superman or "evolution"!!!! But at least accidents exist. In the context of the theory of evolution, another term for "accidents" is "mistakes"!!! So we humans exist because of God or because of countless billions of mistakes!!! Have you ever heard the phrase: an incredibly intelligent mistake??? That is the ultimate oxymoron!!! In fact, the word "evolution" is nothing but a Superman pipe dream. Furthermore, if accidents did create and sequence the DNA for all extinct and living animals, plants, etc. then accidents are claimed by the atheists/evolutionists to be massively smarter than humans because humans cannot sequence the DNA for a single animal or plant species (without cheating)!!! Nowhere in all of science, except the theory of evolution, is it claimed that random accidents ever created anything that was complex, functional and highly sophisticated!!! But "evolution"/"accidents" claims it has happened billions of times (including new types of cells) with very few, if any, errors!! Well, God doesn't make any errors, but outside forces may have damaged some new DNA or cells. Most of this website is designed to explain why "accidents" (though I almost always use the term "evolution" because this website has been around since before 2004 and I have always used the term "evolution") could not have created or sequenced a single DNA strand or a single cell on this planet!!!! Just remember that when you hear or read the word "evolution" you should translate that word into the words: "mindless accidents." The word "mindless" and the word "accidents" and the word "evolution" are redundant with each other!!! Remember, I will frequently continue to use the term "evolution" but when I do, remember that a more correct term would be "mindless accidents" because "evolution" is not a force in nature much less an intellgient force in nature.
Potentially Deceptive Definitions To Get "Evidence" For Evolution
There are two key words which, if not properly understood, could lead a person to believe a pack of lies!!! The two words are micro
Microevolution is perfectly true and it simply means "variety within the same species." There is is no new DNA structure with microevolution.
Let me give you a quick example of microevolution. There are many, many types of "dogs." A Poodle and a Beagle and a Chihuahua and a Pug and a Golden Retriever and a Boxer, etc. are all "dogs." But more importantly, all true "dogs" have exactly the same DNA structure, meaning the section having to do with the color and locations of the colors of fur patterns are in the same locations on their DNA.
However, while their DNA structure is the same, their DNA sequence of nucleotides is not the same!!! Microevolution is perfectly true or all human males and all human females would look exactly alike!!! Well, that is not exactly correct as I will talk about in the Sixteen Cells Paradox article.
Here is my point: microevolution does not create a new species, it is simply "variety within the same species"!!!
On the other hand, macroevolution means that "evolution" has created a new and improved DNA structure, meaning a new species has "evolved" from an existing species (e.g. human DNA evolved from bonobo DNA), by random, mindless mutations to four DNA strands of the current species into four new and improved DNA strands for the new species!!!
In other words, macroevolution means that one species (e.g. bonobo) has "evolved" into a new and improved species (e.g. bonobos "evolved" into humans).
In the case of the claim that humans "evolved" from bonobos, this would be true macroevolution and would require millions of random structural changes to each of four bonobo DNA strands (which changes the sequence of nucleotides [and length] on four bonobo DNA strands into four new sequences of nucleotides for four new human DNA strands) in order to create the male and female of the new human species!!!
Plus an almost entirely new set of cells would be needed for humans to have "evolved" from bonobos meaning most types of cell of bonobo would not be needed by humans!!!
Here is my point: there has never been a proven example of macroevolution (i.e. four new DNA structures, and many new cell types (and some cell types would disappear because they are not needed) have been created by the pure accidents of evolution)!!!
The atheists and evolutionists have NEVER, NEVER, NEVER seen an example of macroevolution and they never will see an example of macroevolution!!!! One reason is the permutations of nucleotides issue which is discussed in my article on permutations.
Why is all of this incredibly important??? Because it implies that humans did not "evolve" from bonobos or chimpanzees or monkeys, etc.!!!!
So have the atheists and evolutionists packed up their bags and headed for the nearest Christian church??? Of course not.
In order to create a new species from an old species (e.g. humans "evolved" from bonobos in this example) requires four new and improved DNA strands!!! In other words two male bonobo DNA types must evolve into two male human DNA types and two female bonobo DNA types must evolve into two female human DNA types to start the human race!!! More details on this later.
But the fact that macroevolution has never, never, never been observed is not going to stop the atheists and evolutionists!!!
And humans would have a very, very different set of cell types than bonobos!!!
The next paragraph is one of the most important paragraphs on this home page!!!!
What the atheists and evolutionists do is look at an example of microevolution [which is nothing but variety within the same species] and claim it is an example of "evolution" (i.e. macroevolution). But this is a lie because there is no new DNA sequence in terms of function!!! They are using a word with the term "evolution" built inside so the reader or student thinks that the atheist or evolutionist is talking about macroevolution, which would be true evolution. Because of this deception the student may believe in the theory of evolution.
But it is a lie because microevolution is not true evolution, it is variety within the same species (i.e. variety within the same DNA structure)!!
The term "DNA structure" for a specific species means the length of the DNA is the same and the functions within that structure are in the same locations. Thus a Boxer "dog" and a Chihuahua "dog" have DNA with the same length and each functional area of the DNA is in the same section of DNA. This is microevolution!!!
Claiming there is a new "species" should mean there is a new set of 4 DNA strands created purely by accidents, meaning there is a new DNA structure for four new DNA strands for the new species!!! For example, for humans to "evolve" from bonobos would require changing four bonobo DNA strands into four human DNA strands. More on this as we go along.
And don't forget there would also be an almost brand new set of cell types to create the humans from bonobos which I talk about from time to time.
The key is that the website or YouTube video or teacher may be defining the word "species" to include examples of microevolution so they can claim they have seen an example of "evolution", meaning they are claiming that Darwin was right!!!
It is an ingenious deception!!! They are using the term ""evolution" instead of the technically correct word: microevolution!!!!!!
I can assure you that God is not amused by this tactic!!! Maybe I should repeat that last sentence about a thousand times!!! The very person they deny exists (i.e. God) is the same person who will determine where each human being will spend eternity!!!
The terms "new DNA structure on four new DNA strands" and "new species" should mean exactly the same thing, but the atheists and evolutionists will never say that because there is no evidence that this has ever happened!!!
Here is my main point: examples of microevolution are used to claim the theory of evolution is true!!! But this is a lie if it claims to be an example of "evolution"!!!
No scientist has ever observed a true example of macroevolution and such an example will never will be found!!!! Much of this website is about this very issue!!!
Because the theory of evolution is scientific nonsense, the atheists/evolutionists have no choice except to use deceptions to get converts!!
Actually, DNA is not the primary thing that controls cell divisions. I will talk about this later.
The evolution debate is between the creation scientists/intelligent design people (i.e. scientists who claim there is massive scientific evidence that there is a God) versus the atheists and evolutionists (who claim there is no God).
The theory of evolution not only does away with a belief in God but it also does away with a belief in Adam and Eve by claiming that humans "evolved" from some other primate. The word "evolution" itself implies that God does not exist and that God did not create any species!!! This leaves the creation of all species solely on the shoulders of the theory of evolution.
The creation scientists / intelligent design people claim, by definition, that God created Adam and Eve and that Adam and Eve are on our genealogy chart.
The atheists / evolutionists, meaning those who support the theory of evolution (including the authors of biology textbooks in virtually all public schools), claim that God does not exist and that Adam and Eve never existed and that humans "evolved" from some other primate, such as bonobo or chimpanzee or monkey, etc. Darwin is their hero!!!
In most biology classrooms a student will hear the name Darwin a lot more than they will hear the name Adam (if the students ever hear that name at all except when the atheists and evolutionists are mocking anyone who believes in God and who believes that Adam and Eve existed)!!!
So the foundation of the evolution debate is between what is taught in church versus what is taught in almost all public schools!!!!!
But what does solid science say about the evolution debate: do we have on our genealogy chart Adam and Eve (as the churches teach) or do we have some bonobo or chimpanzee or monkey couple on our pedigree chart (as the atheists, evolutionists and most public schools teach)???
By the way, if God created Adam and Eve He would have needed to create four new DNA strands and many new types of cells (which did not exist in any other animal species at that time) for every animal species. That would be no problem for Him!!!
Also, if God created Adam and Eve (as all scriptures claim) then Adam and Eve would have had exactly the same DNA structure and cell types and cell locations as modern humans. So zero adjustments to their DNA structure would have been needed for us to exist!!! And God would have created the DNA and cells for all other species, male and female.
For example, God would have created the DNA for bonobos and monkeys and chimpanzees and dogs and cats and humans individually!!! God did not modify bonobo DNA to make Adam and Eve's DNA!!!! Trust me on that one!!!
You are descended from Adam and Eve and also from Noah and his wife.
Not only do we know that Christ existed, but in the Bible the genealogy of Christ is given all the way back to Adam and Eve!!! Christ was the son of God so this is the genealogy of his mother Mary. Joseph and Mary were cousins so they both have essentially the same genealogy. Legally Christ was the son of Joseph, but not literally, so the genealogy starts with Joseph:
Note in verse 23 the comment: "as was to be supposed", meaning Christ was not really the son of Joseph, He was the Son of God!!! Noah was also on that list but his name is spelled: "Noe" in verse 36.
There have been ten million animal species on this planet, nine million of which are extinct. And it takes four new DNA strands to create a new species. So it took 40,000,000 unique and highly sophisticated DNA strands to create all of the animal species which have lived, or currently live, on this planet!!!
That is a lot of unique DNA strands and a massive number of different kinds of cells!!! Well, the DNA in the two ovum of a new species can be the same, but they had to be created independently!!!
Here is the key: the atheists and evolutionists claim there is no God so the burden is on them to explain where the DNA and cell types and cell locations came from (without God) in order to create ten million animal species (nine million of which are extinct) and where did the DNA and cell types and cell locations came from for plants, insects, etc. etc.
The phrase "cell location" refers to the cell divisions as a human baby, who starts out as a single fertilized egg, in nine months becomes a crying baby via a massive number of sophisticated cell divisions. This is true of all animals but all animals have a unique set of cells. A human baby has 326 unique types of cells and each "location" requires the correct type of cell all the way from conception to a crying baby!!!
Of course, the atheists/evolutionists will claim that human DNA controls where the cell types and cell locations belong. And they will claim that the cell types and cell locations of bonobos or monkeys or chimpanzees also came from their DNA and fertilized egg. But as this website states many times, the DNA and cell types and cell locations of one species cannot be changed into the DNA and cell types cell locations of another species!!!! Much of this website deals with this very topic!!!
I should also point out that there are not enough nucleotides on a human DNA strand to control the cell divisions from a fertilized egg into a crying baby!!! More about this later when I talk about spirits, which is something that the atheists and evolutionists reject as existing.
And I can only think of one animal (a specific species of fish) whose DNA is long enough that it might be able to control its cell divisions.
This is a key concept: DNA cannot be changed (to create a new species) while it is inside of a cell, and DNA is always inside of cells!!! I have an article about this that I link to later.
All of this should give you an idea of how incredibly intelligent God is!!!! God does not make mistakes and there is no evidence of mistakes in the creation of any species!!! Do you think that the brainless theory of evolution could create that many DNA strands and cell types and cell locations without any mistakes!!!
Actually, evolution would create nothing but mistakes, statistically speaking!!! And another problem is that the length of a human DNA strand is nowhere near long enough to control that many cell divisions!!!
This is important to understand: scientists today do not understand a single one of these 40,000,000 DNA strands, even if they had access to them!!!!
OK, scientists today do not fully understand a single type of cell in any living or extinct animal species (even if they had access to all of them). This should be a clue that God not only exists, but that He is incredibly smart!!!
But the leading atheists and evolutionists are brain dead and no amount of scientific evidence will convince them that a God exists, because a God would be massively smarter than they are!!!!! Pride is a major, major component of the evolution debate!!!
The primary purpose of this website is to make it very, very clear that the claim that there is no God is total and absolute scientific nonsense!!!
Let's start this section with a story:
Suppose you and a friend were on a hike deep in the forest. You were proud to have traveled so far away from civilization!! Suddenly, as you came over a hill you saw, what looked like to you, a brand-new Buick automobile with its engine running!!
Would you think that this Buick was created by an accidental explosion in the forest?? Of course not!! Would you think that a team of monkeys in the forest or at the zoo had created this Buick?? Of course not!! Would you think that this Buick was created by a team of fifth grade children in your local grade school who had snuck out of class one day?? Of course not!!
Would you think that the giant assembly line where this Buick was assembled was created by a gigantic explosion?? Of course not!!!
What you would think is that this Buick was created in a giant manufacturing plant made by humans in Michigan and/or in other states or countries!!!
Guess what: Every cell in your body is far, far, far more sophisticated than any automobile or any automobile plant ever made by human beings!!!
Let me repeat that:
Guess what: Every cell in your body is far, far, far more sophisticated than any automobile or any automobile plant ever made by human beings!!!
Even if cells were the size of a basketball, scientists could not create a single cell, much less a iving cell!!!
Human beings are not even remotely capable of creating anything as sophisticated as a living cell!!!
Before going on I need to define the phrase: "irreducibly complex system." An "irreducibly complex system on the cellular level" is, by definition, a sequence of complex chemical reactions in a cell, such that if any one of the chemical reactions was not there, or failed, the end result of that chemical reaction will fail and the entire cell may be at risk!!!
Here is a quote from a book called "Evolution: A Theory In Crisis" by creationist (i.e. anti-evolutionist) Michael Denton:
He is essentially saying that accidents (i.e. evolution) could not have created any living cell!!! I should add that there are many millions of different kinds of cells which have existed, or currently exist, on this planet!!! Well, the number is about two billion highly sophisticated cell types just for animals (most of which are extinct)!!!
Need I even mention that cell biologists today would not fully understand a single one of these cells even if they had access to all of them!!!
And Michael Denton was talking about what is going on inside of every cell in your body!!! Yes, every cell in your body is far, far more sophisticated than any automobile ever made!!! Needless to say: humans cannot create a single living cell!!!!
Even if cells were the size of a beachball, all of the scientists on this planet could not create a living cell!!!
Guess what, most of the cells in your body can divide into two cells, each with the above sophistication!!! Try dividing a new automobile into two new automobiles by one team of strong men pulling on the front bumper and another team of strong men pulling on the back bumper!!! Even if they were successful at pulling the car apart they would not end up with two cars, they would end up with two worthless halves of a single car!!
But most cells can divide into two very healthy cells, particularly as a fertilized egg is morphing into a new baby of any animal species!!! Humans are not dumb enough to claim that they could take a computer and cut the computer processor chip in half expecting to have two computer processor chips just as good as the original!!! But that is exactly what cells do!!
As another example of the sophistication of cells, the number of brain cells, and the skull that protects the brain, both grow in size until adulthood. Be glad that the size of our skull and the size of our brain do not quit growing until we reach adulthood!! And be glad they quit growing then!!!
There are many scientists who have a PhD in Cell Biology or are working on obtaining an advanced degree in Cell Biology.
Much will be said on this website about the sophistication of DNA and cells.
The big question this website deals with is this: Were the millions of different highly sophisticated DNA strands and the two billion different kinds of cells (for the roughly ten million species which have existed or currently exist), created by God (as the "creation scientists" and "intelligent design" people say) or were all of the DNA strands and cells created by the mindless accidents of evolution???
Of course there is no evidence of mistakes in the creation of any type of cell or any sequence of nucleotides on any DNA strand. God got it right the first time!!!
So far we have only talked about how many different types of cells there are. Now we will talk about creating a human baby via cell divisions.
A new human baby starts out as a single fertilized egg (a fertilized ovum) and ends up, via cell divisions, with 37.2 trillion cells!!! This new baby has 326 different kinds of cells some of which are transparent or the baby could not see through the hollow pupils of their eyes!!!
The location throughout their body (or your body) of these 326 different types of cells is critical to their (i.e. your) survival!!! So for 37.2 trillion cells the correct type of cell (out of the 326 different types of cells) must end up in exactly the right location at the right time!!!
You probably already did the math, that is 12,127,200,000,000,000 decisions/permutations (more than 12 quadrillion) as to which type of cell ends up in which location of a human baby!!! And this number is not even a single drop of water in the oceans of planets in trillions of Universes like ours as one of the numbers in the permutations of nucleotides article!!!
I call this issue the cell type/cell location issue!!!
By the way, in the asymmetric division model, a stem cell produces one differentiated cell and one stem cell. In the symmetric division model, a stem cell produces two differentiated cells or two stem cells.
Here is my point: human DNA is only 3,200,000,000 nucleotides long. Sorry, human DNA is no where near long enough to control these 12 quadrillion decisions as to which type of cell goes where!!! There are actually mutiple reasons that human DNA cannot control cells divisions.
To give you an idea of how big the small number 3,200,000,000 is, 3,200,000,000 inches equals 50,500 miles!!! The circumference of our planet is only 24,901 miles!!!
A human DNA strand is about seven feet long, yet it fits inside of a single cell.
The issue of controlling cell divisions alone totally destroys the theory of evolution!!! This issue is right up there with the permutations of nucleotides issue and the vast number of different types of cells (TWO BILLION) issue!!!
And don't forget that both males and females, of every species, have specialized cells that the other sex does not have!!!
So the list of things that totally destroy the theory of evolution by themself grows. It now has several major issues:
Are human bodies the result of accidents?? Not a chance!!! However God did it, He had to do it!!!
Humans are just one of ten million types of animal species which have existed, or currently exit, on this planet and each animal species needs or needed their own unique set of cell types in just the right place at the just right time as the fetus is morphing (male and female)!!!
You are going to have to think very hard about this next paragraph, it deals with a very sophisticated issue and there is no simple way to explain this (you may have to read the next paragraph 3 or 4 times very slowly):
This also means, because humans start out as a single type of cell (the fertilized egg), that, whether evolution is true or not, in many, many cases, during cell divisions, a single type of cell, when it divides, will end up as two different kinds of cells (one of which could be similar to the previously existing type - and the other one is a new type of cell or both cells could be new types of cells)!!!
If this were not true we would only consist of one type of cell (an ovum) and we would not exist!!!
How does that happen??? How can a single, incomprehensible type of cell divide and end up as two new and different kinds of cells or at least one new type of cell (which would be required for a single fertilized egg to become a human being)???
To control where these different types of cells end up in the body is far, far, far beyond human comprehension when considering the sophistication of cells!!!
It should be clear to anyone that there is no way that the 3,200,000,000 nucleotides on human DNA could control the creation of, and location of, 12,127,200,000,000,000 combinations of which cell types go in which cell location!!! Sorry atheists, your spirit is alive and well and God is alive and well!!!
This not only applies to ten million animal species, but to plants and insects, etc. which also need their types of cells!!!
Every type of cell in your body, and every type of cell which has ever existed, is sophisticated beyond human comprehension!!!
Thousands of very, very smart scientists (and I mean really, really, really smart scientists) have a PhD degree in either Cell Biology or Microbiology or Genetics. Every cell in your body is vastly more sophisticated than any automobile or airplane ever made!!! PhDs in Cell Biology and Microbiology and Genetics are still being given out to each new generation of scientists as more and more is learned about the sophistication of the many different kinds of cells!!! In addition, to get a PhD you must make some new discovery about cells.
Any of these types of scientists could write a website dozens of times bigger than this website containing thousands of reasons that Cell Biology and Microbiology, etc. by themselves, are a massive, massive proof that God is alive and well and that He is INCREDIBLY SMART!!! This will become more and more obvious the more you study this website.
The problem is that no one would understand their articles unless they had at least a couple of years of Cell Biology or Microbiology classes!!!
These scientists are incredibly smart, but unfortunataly many of them know they are very smart and they have egos far, far bigger than their brains!!!
While they can easily prove that God lives, unfortunately, many of them are so proud that they mock anyone who believes in God!!! Pride may be the main reason that so many people believe in the theory of evolution!!! Many people cannot tolerate that someone else (i.e. God) could be smarter than they are!!! After all, does God have a PhD in Cell Biology?? Well, God is a billion times smarter than any PhD in Cell Biology because He sequenced the DNA and created the cells, and placed the cells, for every living and extinct animal and plant species!!!
By the way, the cells in the bodies of Adam and Eve had to have this level of sophistication!!!! God did not create Adam and Eve, rather God created the cell types and cell locations for both Adam and Eve!!!
Getting back to evolution, sometimes the atheists and evolutionists create drawings or pictures which seem to show an "evolution" from one species to another. But if you look at the DNA and cell types and cell locations of the cells in these animals the theory of evolution falls apart because it is obvious that the DNA and cell types and cell locations of one species could not have "evolved" into new and improved DNA and cell types and cell locations for a new and improved species of animal!!!
I don't have a clue as to how many different kinds of cells there are (or have been) for the one million living species of animals, the nine million extinct animal species, plants, insects and who knows what other kinds of living things there are, or have been, on this planet. But it is in the billions range!!!
Time after time after time I talk about the intelligence of God. My conclusion is this: if God were not incredibly smart no living thing could exist on this planet.
Think about the incredible sophistication of cells, which no team of humans can replicate!!! If God had not created cells, neither Adam and Eve nor chimpanzees nor horses could have been created!!! Cells had to come before any other living thing came to exist, even if you believe in the theory of evolution!!!!
Don't tell me that humans evolved from bonobos until you can prove that many different kinds of cells could be created and combined to create a human from a bonobo!!!
Let me repeat that:
Don't tell me that humans evolved from bonobos until you can prove that many different kinds of cells could be created and combined to create a human from a bonobo!!!
All of the PhDs in cell biology and microbiology combined could not create a single living cell from scratch. Yet cells had to be created before any plant or any animal!!! But neither human beings nor the mindless accidents of the theory of evolution could create a living cell, much less the trillions of living cells just to create small animals (humans have 37.2 trillion cells)!!!
Moving on, if there were no God the Universe would be nothing but dust and rocks and there would be no galaxies, no planets and no living thing!!! The entire Universe would be nothing but a gigantic, gigantic gigantic Oort Cloud or Asteroid Belt!!!
Yet the entire foundation of the theory of evolution is the claim that there is no God and that humans "evolved" from some other primate. I will generally use bonobos as our "ancestors" to represent the claims of the atheists and evolutionists. But pick any primate you want.
If humans had "evolved" from bonobos (or any other primate), the atheists and evolutionists must explain how bonobo DNA came to exist without God all the way back to the first living cell)!!! And then they must explain how bonobo cell types and cell location, male and female, "evolved" into human cell types and cell locations without God???
Many new types of cells, and four vastly different DNA strands, would be needed for that to have happened. All of the very smart human Cell Biologists today could not create a new type of cell from scratch!!!
What evolutionists must prove is that it is physically and mathematically credible to claim that human bonobo DNA, cell types and cell locations could turn into human DNA, cell types and cell locations!!!
As always it gets worse!!! Actually four bonobo DNA strands would have had to simultaneous mutate (via accidents) into four human DNA strands (in the same latitude, longitude and timeframe) via the mindless accidents of evolution if evolution were true!!!
I will talk later about why NEW species need four new DNA strands, but existing species only need three types of DNA strands to continue to exist. Let us talk about existing species.
All existing animal species need three types of DNA strands:
So the sperm cell (which gets to an ovum first) determines the sex of the new baby (and then the sperm cell is done), because it is the fertilized ovum that actually becomes the new baby via cell divisions starting with the fertilized ovum.
Yes, you started out as a single fertilized ovum!!!
But creating a new species (either by evolution or God) requires four new and improved DNA strands as I talk about from time to time.
Even scientists today could not convert bonobo DNA into human DNA without cheating because millions of changes to bonobo DNA would be needed, to four bonobo DNA strands, (to create the four DNA strands needed to start the human race) and many of the changes would be related to creating the massively superior human brain!!! Scientists could physically create the DNA strands, but they could not sequence the nucleotides without looking at already existing DNA!!!
In other words: true evolution (changing the DNA and cell types and cell locations of one species into the DNA and cell types and cell locaitons of another species) is something that humans cannot do!!! And they will never be able to do it because God would need to provide a spirit to work with the DNA!!! Good luck getting God to help the atheists prove there is no God!!! And atheists and evolutionists do not believe in spirits!!! And don't forget the new types of cells which are needed by the new species.
The Sixteen Cells Paradox discussed below is a proof that DNA cannot control cell divisions - it is mathematically impossible for DNA to control the cell divisions because of a paradox having to do with DNA being able to control cell divisions as a single fertilized egg is morphing into a baby of any species!!!
So how could four bonobo DNA strands be converted into four human DNA strands by nothing but the mindless accidents of evolution???!!! That is one of the key issues in the evolution debate!!!
Much will be said on this website about the complete absurdity, for both physical and mathematical reasons, regarding the claims of evolution.
The purpose of the evolution doctrine, of course, is to create more atheists and evolutionists who claim there is no God (i.e. who claim there is no Godhead)!!!
As I will mention several times on this website, no one can claim that Jesus Christ did not exist because there are many ancient documents, even other than the Bible, which mention Him. Thus, the atheists and evolutionists can only claim that Christ did not perform any miracles (more on this below).
In the Mormon religion (i.e. officially The Church Of Jesus Christ Of Latter-Day Saints, founded in 1830), and in some other Christian religions, there are three separate Gods in the Godhead: Heavenly Father, Jesus Christ and the Holy Ghost. However, some other Christian religions teach there is one God who has three forms (i.e. Heavenly Father, Jesus Christ and the Holy Ghost are three forms of the same God).
In the massive, massive Grand Council meeting (your spirit was there and you were very sentient as a spirit), which occurred before Adam and Eve were put on this earth more than 6,000 years ago, it was Jehovah (i.e. Christ) versus Lucifer (i.e. now known as the devil). But Adam was clearly Christ's top general!!
In fact, it is fairly clear that it was Adam (then called Michael), and perhaps many others, who physically cast Lucifer (i.e. satan) and his followers out of the meeting (and likely off of the planet the meeting was held on).
So one of the gigantic reasons that satan pushes the theory of evolution so hard is precisely so that people will not believe that Adam and Eve ever existed!!!
So the evolution battle today is not much more than a continuation of the Grand Council as the theory of evolution tries to do away with a belief in the divinity of Christ and the importance and existence of Adam and Eve (in addition to claiming that Heavenly Father and the Holy Ghost do not exist)!!!
Here is a sobering thought: "If satan himself were to design his perfect doctrine today to draw people away from a belief in the Godhead, including the divinity of Christ (his arch enemy), it would be the theory of evolution!!!
Professor Matthews, who represented the Latter-Day Saint (i.e. Mormon) religion before his death, was absolutely correct!! The theory of evolution is designed to convert people who believe in the divinity of Christ over to people who believe that we "evolved" from lower primates!!! Because of the theory of evolution, many people no longer believe in Heavenly Father or in the mission of the Messiah or in the Holy Ghost!!!
I can summarize the theory of evolution debate in one sentence: "The theory of evolution exists to convince students and others that bonobos (or some other primate) became humans, meaning evolution exists to convince students that the Godhead does not exist (or in the case of Christ that He was not a God and that He does not exist today because they claim He was not resurrected because they claim He was not a God)!!!"
That is precisely what Professor Matthews was saying!!! Schools that teach the theory of evolution are teaching the religion of atheism and horrible, horrible science!!!
The theory of evolution is nothing more than the scientific arm and official doctrine of atheism!!!! Atheism is the end goal of the theory of evolution.
A student may ask: isn't the theory of evolution a proven fact of science??? While the atheists/evolutionists may claim the theory of evolution is scientific, in fact it is not a proven scientific fact!!! The entire purpose of this website is to demonstrate, in scores of different ways, that the theory of evolution is very, very, very bad science!!!
For example, if the atheists/evolutionists claim that evolution is true, they must explain how four DNA strands of one or more bonobos, monkeys or apes, etc. (any of these animals would obviously have vastly different DNA than humans) became four human DNA strands by using nothing but the mindless accidents of evolution!!!
I talk in detail about why four new and improved DNA strands are needed to create a new species from an old species from time to time because it is such a key issue.
I will also prove below (e.g. in the Sixteen Cells Paradox article), that DNA is not what controls cell divisions (i.e. the many many, many cell divisions that convert a single fertilized egg into a crying baby)!!! Actually, I mention multiple reasons why DNA cannot be controlling these cell divisions.
The atheists have no clue what controls these cell divisions because DNA is nowhere near long enough to control these cell divisions as I will talk about in much more detail later. In fact, the length of DNA is not even close to being the main reason that DNA cannot control cell divisions (a paradox is the main reason).
There are both physical issues (physically changing four bonobo DNA strands into four new human DNA strands) and statistical issues (how can the sequence of nucleotides on four massively complicated and sophisticated bonobo DNA strands accidentally change into the sequence of nucleotides on four vastly superior and massively more sophisticated human DNA strands)???
By the way, the length of DNA has nothing to do with the sophistication of the animal it supposedly creates (if evolution were true). The longest DNA strand on earth is for a fish, which I will talk about below!!!
So what may start out as a simple question quickly becomes the question: "can the DNA and cells types and cell locations of one species 'evolve' into new and vastly improved DNA and cell types and cell locations to create a new and vastly improved species"??
And this project would have to include both intelligence issues (e.g. intelligently resequencing the nucleotides on four DNA strands to create a single new animal species) and physical reasons (physically changing the DNA and cell types and cell locations of an existing species [as created by evolution] into the DNA and cell types and cell locations of a new and improved species).
And there have been ten million animal species on this planet, each of which would have needed four new DNA strands to create each species when it first formed. That is forty million DNA strands just for animals and scientists would not understand a single one of them even if they had access to all of them!!!
I should repeat that a million times: That is forty million DNA strands just for animals and scientists would not understand a single one of them even if they had access to all of them!!!
Yet God has created and sequenced 40,000,000 DNA strands with no known errors - just for animals!!!
The intelligence chart looks like this:
Could the brainless accidents of evolution have created and sequenced 40,000,000 DNA strands with no known errors??? Let's dig deeper into why I point this out.
One of the GIGANTIC problems for the atheists/evolutionists is this: where are the failures of evolution???
There may be some mutations to animal DNA, but there is no evidence of a pattern of failures in sequences of nucleotides that evolution would have created. For example, for every success of evolution, in sequencing four new and improved DNA strands to create a new species, there would have been countless quadrillions of defective DNA strands which did not have a viable enough sequence of nucleotides to create a new species.
And many of these defective DNA strands would create animals which were deformed and could not survive to maturity!!! Where are all of the deformed animals whose DNA was not quite good enough to create a viable new species????
In other words, this planet went from zero DNA strands needed to create animals to 40,000,000 highly sophisticated DNA strands to create 10,000,000 animal species (including humans) without any known errors!!!!! This did not happen by mindless accidents!!!
And where are the trillions and trillions of defective cells (i.e. the wrong type of cell or a defective cell)???
My comments on permutations of nucleotides (i.e. sequences of nucleotides) is a major part of the foundation of why the theory of evolution cannot be true!!! You will learn a lot about permutations on this website.
Before going on I think you might want to see a map on a very pro-evolution website!!! Pay close attention if you live in Utah. This map shows where the school districts are which teach creation science!!!!!! The more green dots the better (if you believe in God)!!! Sometimes the main map does not load:
If this map is accurate, all public schools in Utah teach Darwinism, atheism and evolution because there are no green dots in Utah!!!! Only private schools teach creation science in Utah. I guess a lot of politicians in Utah are really, really, really stupid!!! If any of them wants to debate me, I will be happy to come out to Utah if the audience is large enough (I live near Kansas City but I will pay my own way there and back).
I don't know at what level these decisions are made, but considering that God is very much alive and well, there is a massive amount of really bad science and many really stupid people in Utah!!! But the stupidity is more likely at the district level than the classroom level. The Utah map clearly implies the main decisions are made at the district level or state level, not the local level. So there may very well be some really sharp people in some of the Utah schools.
If you have read this far, pat yourself of the back - you are a rare person!!!! Now go and tell others via voice, emails, social media and links on your website!!! Search engines are a piece of junk because they don't know the good websites from the bad websites. They don't even know the creation science websites from the atheist/evolutionist websites.
So it is up to people like you to spread the word!!!! By the way, I can tell by hit patterns when someone spreads the news about this website to scores of their friends!!! But that doesn't happen very often.
If you live in Utah and you are a high school student or a parent of a high school student, I would greatly appreciate it if you would email me this information:
So the author's names are critical!!!
I will take this section down when I have enough information to see a pattern and I will publish the results on this home page right here.
My email address is at the bottom of this page.
Thanks in advance!!!
I feel sorry for students who live in California, Oregon and Washington states. These heathen states are the definition of "atheist heaven." I honesly don't know what is wrong with these states aside from rank stupidity.
I am a retired cancer researcher who worked with about 13,000 cancer patients before I retired at the end of 2015. There are two major types of cancer treatments. First, are orthodox cancer treatments (i.e. chemotherapy, radiation and surgery) which have about a 2.1% 5-year survival rate according to their own statistics. Do the math, 97.9% of their patients are dead in less than 5 years!!! That is pathetic!!!
The Mormon pioneers were curing cancer at least as early as 1847, when they arrived in Utah. They used Cayenne Pepper which is now known to kill cancer cells!!! In the 1930s (long before the discovery of DNA), Royal Rife had a 100% cure rate by safely killing the bacteria inside of cancer cells with gentle electrical signals (gentle unless you happen to be a bacteria)!!! Cancer cells were first known to have bacteria inside of them in 1890.
Did you notice something. Cancer is NOT caused by DNA damage!!! My five articles on cancer go into great detail about these any many other issues. I include linking to someone who supports cancer patients who use natural cancer treatments. I am very, very familiar with the treatments they use.
Article #1: The Main Cancer Article
Article #2: The Truth About Cancer, Cancer Is NOT Caused By DNA Damage!!!
Article #3: Old Testament: Daniel Chapter 7 - Cancer And The Fourth Beast And Ten Horns.
Article #4: Secret Abominations And The Latter-Day Saint Church (i.e. the "Mormon" Church)
Article #5: The Suppression Of Truth About Cancer!!!
So what is going to happen when Daniel's prophesy is completely fulfilled??? There won't be any more mass murderers!!! That is what this article is about:
We have already mentioned cells many times!!! A special discussion about cells clearly deserves its own article!!! So here it is:
While the word "evolution" cannot be found in the scriptures (the word did not exist in ancient times), the scriptures certainly predicted the theory of evolution was coming!!!
Was God surprised when Darwin's theory of evolution (Darwin's first evolution book came out in 1859) started to convince people that there was no God?? Of course not!!! God is never surprised by anything. Both the Bible and the Book of Mormon (the Book of Mormon is also an ancient book written by ancient prophets, but it was written by a different group of prophets than the Bible) prepared the children of God for the coming of the theory of evolution.
The last prophet in Book of Mormon times (Moroni) completed the Book of Mormon in 421 A.D.. But we don't know when he died or was translated. Most of the Book of Mormon was written in the Americas. It was first translated and published (by the modern prophet Joseph Smith) in 1830, which was 29 years before Darwin's first evolution book came out in 1859.
So the Book of Mormon was not reacting to the theory of evolution because it was published 29 years before Darwin's first evolution book was published!!!
Because the Book of Mormon was written by prophets it makes it very clear that God created Adam and Eve. For example, see 2 Nephi 2:17-27:
In the Book of Mormon there is a story where satan, before the birth of Christ, appears to a man named Korihor and satan himself taught Korihor that Christ would never exist. Korihor then started teaching the doctrines of satan to others. These events happened about 55 B.C..
The great Book of Mormon prophet Alma the Younger was not amused by Korihor's teachings that Christ would never be born. As a response to Korihor's demand for a "sign" that God lived, the prophet Alma the Younger (via the priesthood) commanded Korihor to be struck dumb (Alma 30: 46-60)!!! That was God's sign to Korihor, so God did show Korihor a sign!!! But it was not the type of sign that Korihor wanted!!!
That should give you an idea of what God (via one of His prophets) thinks about the theory of evolution (i.e. the claim there is no God, such as the future birth of Christ in this case). And it should also tell you that satan does not support his own followers and in the end he drags them down to hell (if they do not repent in time)!!! Here is an article on that event:
The theory of evolution today is satan's perfect doctrine because it was designed to do away with a belief in the Godhead by claiming that God (i.e. Heavenly Father) and the Holy Ghost do not exist.
The atheists and evolutionists cannot claim that Jesus Christ did not exist because there are many ancient documents, even other than the Bible, which mention Him as I will dig into below.
So the atheists and evolutionists can only claim that Christ did not perform any miracles, such as the healing of the sick, the raising of the dead and His own resurrection. The Book of Mormon predicted this precise behavior in the book of 3 Nephi 29:4-7 (in the Book of Mormon) as I talk about from time to time!!!
Before going on I want to mention 15 of the best detailed articles on this website about why the theory of evolution cannot be true (remember, click on a blue link).
|
|
Fifteen Of The Most Important Articles On This Website
1) Permutations Of Nucleotides - The #1 Reason Evolution Cannot Be True!!!
2) First Living Cell issue.
3) Counting Intermediate Species - The #2 Reason Evolution Cannot Be True!!!
This article demonstrates that there is zero evidence of intermediate species between the "first living cell" (which would have had to have exist if the theory of evolution is true) and mice or humans or dinosaurs, etc. etc. You cannot jump from a single living cell to an animal with a circulatory system, a heart, a brain, etc. etc., which even mice have!!!
4) Changing The Length Of A DNA Strand (To Create A New Species From An Old Species) By Evolution/Accidents Is Impossible
5) Cell Type/Cell Location Issues - The #3 Reason Evolution Cannot Be True!!!
6) Sixteen Cells Paradox
7) Two-Male DNA Alignment Issue - Incredible Proof Of The Intelligence Of God!!!
8) Digging Deeper Into The Claim That Humans "Evolved" From Bonobos - Absolute Proof That Humans Did Not Evolve From Any Other Primate
9) Kehr's Paradox #1 and Kehr's Paradox #2
10) Astronomy - 2 Articles
11) Physics Related Article And One Free eBook - Links To Other Related Articles:
12) Could A Simple Cell Exist??
13) Why Do We Need Computer Programmersr?
14) What Computer Programming Can Teach Us About Evolution
15) Does "Natural Selection" Have Anything To Do With The Theory Of Evolution?
Fifteen Reasons Why The Theory Of Evolution Cannot Be True
You just saw fifteen articles, here is a link to fifteen reasons why the theory of evolution cannot be true:
Twenty-Five Reasons The Theory Of Evolution Cannot Be True
I have multiple articles with different numbers of reasons why the theory of evolution cannot be true. Here is an article with a list of twenty-five reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true:
Spirits Were Not Created And They Cannot Die - EVER!!!
Yes, humans have spirits. When we die our spirit stays on this planet (well, we actually can go to another planet if we wish). Here is an article on the LDS website (using quotes by Brigham Young) about the spirit world: My wife has been in the spirit world since May of 2016, and for four years I was an ordinance worker in the Kansas City Temple, so I could add a lot of things to that article!!! So could Brigham Young because he has been in the spirit world for many decades as a major church leader. Here is another quote by a president of the LDS church - President John Taylor:
While spirits live forever, eventually everyone will be resurrected and we will have physical bodies forever!!! However, on Judgment Day (i.e. the Second Coming of Christ), all people will be judged and will untimately spend eternity on one of two different planets (this planet and the planet the wicked go after the Millennium). The atheists and evolutionists don't believe in spirits (do they get anything right???). Fortunately for them, they have a spirit so they will live forever in spite of their beliefs (or lack thereof).
In fact, spirits cannot be created or die. See this article (see the third and fourth paragraphs) from the BYU website: In short, the spirit controls the cell divisions and the size of the DNA will be largely (if not entirely) dependent on the size of the database, meaning the size of the individual database elements (e.g. "fields") on the DNA strand!! The largest DNA strand on this planet, and it is much, much larger than human DNA, is for a fish, protopterus aethiopicus, which has 133 billion nucleotide pairs on its DNA!!! Why a fish has such a gigantic database I do not know. Maybe this type of fish has an unusually high number of different types of cells - I don't know.
LifeLet me briefly talk about "life." Scientists have tried to create life from non-life. They will NEVER be successful unless God cooperates and provides a spirit. I do not know if each bacteria has its own spirit or whether there is some general spirit for single-celled living things. I talk more about "What Is Life?" in a section later on. Humans, and all other species, exist because of God!!! Yes, science has confirmed that the Biblical account of Adam and Eve IS TRUE!!! Your genealogy chart has Noah and his wife (some Bible scholars think her name was Naamah) on it and Adam and his wife Eve on it!!! In other words, Adam and Eve are on mine and your genealogy chart, not some bonobo couple!!! Try saying that in some college biology class!!! I would do it, but then I am an ex-Marine and Viet Nam veteran so everyone would be polite to an old man who went to war and got blown up while on patrol. Yes, we should appreciate our veterans!! They are why we are free!!!
As an ex-Marine, Viet Nam veteran, I love this amazing YouTube video about the "fallen" in war. This is an incredible, incredible, incredible six minute YouTube video showing military cemeteries around the world (as they say: war is hell) - WATCH THE ADVERTISEMENT!!!!!:
Here is another video (4 minutes) about man's inhumanity to man (read the words of the YouTube video). The singer is amazing: There are other YouTube videos linked to in the very bottom section of this home page.
The Theory of Evolution Battle In The Schools
Someone should take a survey of students in any school district in any state and ask two simple questions: I would love to see the results!!! Remember, it was probably Adam (back then named "Michael") who cast Lucifer (now called "satan") out of the Grand Council!!! So they knew each other very well!!! I suspect that Lucifer's favorite "theory" is the theory of evolution for that very reason - it does away with a belief in Adam and Eve!!! Unfortunately, the imaginary, atheistic "theory of evolution" is taught in many schools, from middle school to college. I guess that no one in these schools has heard about the discovery of DNA yet!!! Yes, schools are teaching religion (meaning the religion of atheism/evolution). Well, at least the biology textbooks that they use typically support the theory of evolution.
Regarding the preaching of the theory of evolution, as the Book of Mormon says: they are "puffed up because of their learning, and their wisdom, and their riches." Here is the reference (the Book of Mormon prophet Jacob is speaking): The main exceptions of teaching atheism/evolution in schools, of course, are schools funded and operated by religious groups which typically do not teach the theory of evolution. In fact, many, many young people today go to church on the weekends and they are told there is a God, but during the week in public schools they may be taught that the theory of evolution is true and there is no God. Darwin is worshipped in many schools. Because of the teaching of the theory of evolution (i.e. the religion of atheism) in schools, many, many young people of all religions (starting in middle school in many cases) have lost their faith in God and have quit going to church, or if they are taken to church by their parents, they will go to church but they will not believe anything they hear!!! That is the very goal and purpose of the theory of evolution - to convince people that there is no God. "Creation science" or "creationism" or "intelligent design" are scientific claims that God lives. Teaching "creation science" is not the same thing as endorsing a specific religion. "Creation science" is purely scientific and generic (i.e. it does not favor any religion) in proving that there is a God without endorsing any specific religious denomination. There are people in all religions who teach and/or endorse creation science. SO THERE SHOULD BE NO PROBLEMS WITH TEACHING CREATIONISM IN SCHOOLS BECAUSE CREATIONISM DOES NOT ENDORSE ANY SPECIFIC RFELIGION!!!! This is a "creation science" website except that I do have some comments and optional articles for Latter-Day Saints (Mormons). Getting back to public schools, because creation science does not endorse any specific religion there should be nothing wrong with teaching intelligent design in schools because it is rock solid science and it does not endorse any specific religious denomination!!! Those who argue that the theory of evolution should be taught in schools may claim that all scientists are evolutionists. However, the theory of evolution is NOT universally accepted by all scientists!! Such a claim is absurd!!! While there are hundreds of books which have been written to push the theory of evolution; there are almost certainly hundreds of books which have been written against the theory of evolution!! Four of these books are free and are on this website. Plus, in the scientific community, among those who have not written books, there are many scientists who are very much against the theory of evolution!!! Those who believe that the scientific evidence strongly supports a belief in God are called "creation scientists" or "intelligent design" supporters. The well-known and respected creation scientist Kent Hovind describes the atheists this way: "The atheists can't find God for the same reason a thief can't find a policeman." That quote hits the nail on the head!!! Pride is the underlying, undergirding, driving force of the theory of evolution, it is certainly not science!!!! Many people want to be considered to be the smartest being in the Universe. They want to be considered sophisticated!!! And more importantly they want to be popular!!! The atheists/evolutionists don't want to find God because of pride!!! If there was only one reason the super-atheists exist, it is pride!!! Pride is a massive, massive problem in some colleges!!! Many college students and professionals have massive, massive, massive problems with pride which is precisely why they do not believe in God!!! It is not "cool" to believe in God in many schools because a God would be smarter than they are!!! California, Oregon and Washington are probably the worst states for mocking anyone who claims there is a God!!! President Trump, when fighting for his first term in office, didn't even waste his time going to these three heathen states because they are so "liberal." But whereever they live, atheists/evolutionists are "puffed up" (i.e. super arrogant)!!! To make things worse, the students in many schools who believe in God may be mocked as being "unsophisticated." It is pride which drives people like Richard Dawkins into being a prime candidate for the "like unto the son of perdition" category. Such people cannot accept that some ancient carpenter (i.e. Christ) could be better than they are!!! They forget that He was the first person to be resurrected on this planet!! After the resurrection of Christ, many ancient people were resurrected!!! Could they have resurrect themselves after their dead body had laid in the tomb for up to 3,900 years??? There is certainly no "resurrection" in the theory of evolution!!! The very fuel that drives the theory of evolution and atheism is pride!!!! But the key point is that the theory of evolution is nothing but atheism in disguise. So any school which teaches evolution is teaching the religion of atheism in their school!!! Now only that, they are teaching REALLY, REALLY, REALLY BAD SCIENCE!!! Later on this home page I will have a section called: Measuring The Damage Caused By The Theory of Evolution which talks about creationist Ken Ham's research on the damage done by the theory of evolution to the young people of his evangelical faith (I am a Latter-Day Saint). He demonstrates that the destruction of a testimony in God begins in middle school in many cases!!!
|
|
Modern Prophets and Apostles (Meaning Living Prophets and Apostles)!!!The Church Of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (a.k.a. the "Mormon" church because of our belief that the Book of Mormon was written by ancient Christian prophets, one of whom was named Mormon) claims to have a living prophet (the president of the church) and usually 14 living apostles (two of whom are in the First Presidency with the prophet). All 15 of these men are sustained by the members of the church as "prophets, seers and revelators".
Here is a web page on a different website of mine which is generally up-to-date (focus on the bottom section of the page for those with birth dates - these fifteen apostles are very much alive): The bottom person with the bottom green background and with a birth date is the President of the church (i.e. Russel M. Nelson). The three men whose names have a dark yellow background (Oaks, Ballard and Eyring) are in the current First Presidency of the church or they are the President of the Quorum of Twelve Apostles or they are the Acting President Of The Quorum of the Twelve (Ballard). While dead prophets have given us the scriptures, which is very, very important, living prophets are even more important because they can deal with contemporary issues facing the members of the church. For example, to no one's surprise, even living prophets and apostles have been critical of the theory of evolution. In a moment I will link to a talk given by a living apostle, Elder Jeffrey R. Holland, who is on the list I just mentioned, from a speech given at Brigham Young University. But before you watch that speech I need to talk about the word "secularism" or you will not understand much of what he talks about.
Let me quote one of the definitions of "secularism": "The indifference to, or rejection or exclusion of, religion and religious considerations. As a philosophy, secularism seeks to interpret life on principles taken solely from the material world, without recourse to religion." Secularism does not mock religion (that would be humanism), but it is atheism on steroids!!! Elder Holland's talk is against secularism!!! Elder Holland wants governments to be more and more connected to religion. Not any specific religion because missionaries of all religions should be welcome in every country (this is called "freedom of religion", which the LDS church strongly supports)!!! Elder Holland's talk mentions many great people over the centuries who have, in some cases, given their lives to spread a belief in God and/or in a belief in freedom of religion. In his speech he talks a lot about many great people!!! But in this talk he also mentioned by name four of the best-known atheists/evolutionists!! But he did not say anything good about them!!! Here is a quote from Elder Holland's speech and a link to the speech. (Note: if you click on the blue link below the quote, and if you then click the triangle/arrow link on that page (on the BYU website) - you can both watch and read his amazing speech at the same time. I should mention there are some graphic statues in this video which might be too intense for high school students - his talk was given at BYU.
Everyone should watch this video at least 2 or 3 times!!! The reason is that this website is focused on atheism and evolution versus creation science and intelligent design, whereas Elder Holland's talk is at the very different level of religion versus secularism!!! That is a topic that everyone needs to clearly understand!! In his talk he mentioned by name four of the most well-known atheists/evolutionists, which are in the above quote (e.g. Richard Dawkins). I should mention that the Book of Mormon was published in 1830, more than 110 years before Richard Dawkins was born!!! And the Book of Mormon was published 29 years before Charles Darwin's first book on evolution was published!!! Yes, God didn't like the theory of evolution long before Charles Darwin and Richard Dawkins came along!!! The original prophets who wrote the Book of Mormon finished writing the Book of Mormon in 421 A.D.!!! So even before 421 A.D. God knew that people like Richard Dawkins would exist in the last-days. All four of the men mentioned by Elder Holland easily fit the criteria for becoming "like unto the Son of Perdition." However, this is such a horrific punishment that only God can make the final determination!!! For example, some of the scores of people who currently fit into this category may repent and be forgiven. Others may not cross the line. God is the only judge. If I had to summarize the main point in Elder Holland's talk in one paragraph, this is what I would say: "Religion has been the driving force for good throughout the centuries and the proper role of government is to preserve and protect freedom of religion for all religions!!! In some instances, a religion needs to be protected from another religion which has political power (or from non-religious groups)!!! Governments should not take sides in such a dispute but should make sure that no religion is harmed in any way by those in the other religion (or non-religious group)." Getting back to Dawkins and others, the "evolution debate" is not an entertaining side-show, it deals with very serious issues in the eyes of God which Christ Himself implied!!! In Darwin's defense (now I am back to Darwin), while scientists in his day knew about cells, they knew nothing about what is going on inside of cells and certainly nothing about DNA (which was not discovered until 1953 by Watson and Crick). Two of the most-deserved Nobel prizes in history were given for the discovery of DNA. Francis Crick and James Watson won the Nobel prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1962.
Here is another wonderful talk by Elder Holland, this time about faith and it was given in General Conference. Read/listen to the entire speech but pay close attention to the phrase: "That must be terribly frustrating to Him, but He deals with it." (click the triangle in the photograph):
Before going on, and for future reference if you are interested, here is a web page with Darwin's entire Origin of Species. I include this link so that his first book can be searched for key words if you wish to do that:
Well, here is a document written by the First Presidency of the LDS church called: Gospel Classics: The Origin Of Man Here is a quote from that document: "It is held by some that Adam was not the first man upon this earth and that the original human being was a development from lower orders of the animal creation. These, however, are the theories of men. The word of the Lord declared that Adam was “the first man of all men” (Moses 1:34), and we are therefore in duty bound to regard him as the primal parent of our race. It was shown to the brother of Jared that all men were created in the beginning after the image of God; whether we take this to mean the spirit or the body, or both, it commits us to the same conclusion: Man began life as a human being, in the likeness of our Heavenly Father." So if Heavenly Father came down and appeared to us, we would see him as a man. So what is the character of God??? Is God a dictator??? An early apostle of the church, George Q. Cannon taught:
Wow, Heavenly Father is a nice person!!! Why would anyone be surprised at that??? Read that amazing quote two or three times!!! And I can assure you that the Savior Jesus Christ and the Holy Ghost are both nice people. Remember, it was Heavenly Father who chose Jesus Christ from among billions of His spirit children!!! He chose Jesus Christ partly because Christ was very similar to Himself!!! Here is another quote by President Cannon:
Humanism And Secular HumanismActually Elder Holland's talk was very diplomatic compared to what he could have talked about. "Secular Humanism" or just "Humanism," which Elder Holland did not talk about, is even worse than "secularism." Well, "secularism" has several different meanings. Here is Wikipedia's take on secular humanism: "Secular humanism, or simply humanism, is a philosophy or life stance that embraces human reason, ethics, and philosophical naturalism while specifically rejecting religious dogma, supernaturalism, pseudoscience, and superstition as the basis of morality and decision making." Note that secular humanism is more pro-active at attacking the existence of God than the theory of evolution or even secularism. Essentially, this philosophy replaces God with man!!! So it not only rejects any God, it replaces God with humans and makes humans the supreme beings in the Universe!!! Slowly ponder this next paragraph to see if humans could replace God as Humanism implies: A major problem with this philosophy is that all of the scientists on this planet combined cannot sequence the DNA for any animal species (without cheating)!!! Nor could they create a cell from scratch, must less create a living cell from scratch!!! That is hardly the qualifications for replacing God with humans!!! It is all in their imaginations!!! If secular humanism were true there would not be any living thing on this planet; not even humans and certainly not humanists!!! Could humans have created our own DNA before we existed (assuming that we do not have spirits as the atheists/evolutionists believe)???!!!!! Of course not!!! Secular humanism is nothing but a GIGANTIC PARADOX!!!
In short: President Dallin Oaks, now in the First Presidency of the church, gave a talk in General Conference where he talked about "secular humanism" called: "Stand As A Witness of God" in the Ensign, March, 2015.
Sometimes you need to have an account with the LDS church to read old speechs so I cannot guarantee you will be able to see his talk unless you have an LDS account, but give it a try (Section: Secular Humanism).
In case you cannot get to his article, I have a copy of it online: I actually met President Oaks more than 50 years ago when he was in what we call a: Stake Presidency in the Chicago area. He went out of his way to talk to a very new member of the LDS church!! He is the one of the nicest people I have ever met!!! In fact, two of the nicest people I have ever met in person were President Oaks and President Monson (a deceased president of the LDS church). Both of these men could not be any nicer!!! I am sure other apostles are very nice, but I haven't met them. I used to work for "church security" so I have actually met four of the apostles over the years. The two men I just mentioned were clearly the nicest of that very small group.
Yet Another Alternative To Religion: Philosophical NaturalismI want to emphasize a concept. Secularism and philosophical naturalism are close cousins. Author and attorney Phillip E. Johnson (a very good man who I do not think is LDS) explains the hidden agenda of the evolutionists:
Read that quote two or three times, it is an amazing statement!!! The two words "most plausible" are amazing. The atheists and evolutionists have an agenda, they assume that the theory of evolution is true and they then start collecting the tools they need to achieve their goals of getting converts!!!
Here is my article on this website about the "Hidden Agenda" of those who push the theory of evolution:
A Summary List Of The False Doctrines Of The Theory Of EvolutionThe theory of evolution is not just an abberation of true religion, it is essentially a mirror-image of true religion!!! It was carefully designed to be a mirror-image of the truth!!!
Here is a key point to remember, the theory of evolution is satan's perfect doctrine because evolution does away with a belief in:
The atheists and evolutionists also do not believe that all living things have a spirit, so they do not believe in: The atheists can't get anything right!!! Atheism and evolution are very, very myopic and their followers only believe in what they can see and some obvious things.
The theory of evolution is a mirror-image of the doctrines of The Church of Jesus Christ Of Latter-Day Saints (and to a large degree every other Christian church). Here is an article on that subject (this article has a chart which compares, side-by-side, the doctrines of the LDS church - and some of the doctrines of many other churches - versus the doctrines of the theory of evolution):
Another article which digs into these issues is the First Book article which identifies three different places in the Book of Mormon where the theory of evolution is predicted; but the word "evolution" could not be used in the Book of Mormon because the word did not exist in ancient times. Nor did the word exist when the Book of Mormon was first published in 1830 in America as far as I know (Darwin's first [evolution] book came out in 1859 in England):
Changing the subject, Elder Holland also gave one the great talks, in 1997, specifically for those who feel unworthy of the blessings of God. This is an amazing talk for anyone as we all have our "bad days"!!! (In this case click the arrow inside his picture to read and hear his talk at the same time)
For those who think their faith is weak compared to their trials (that is pretty much all of us), here is another talk by Elder Holland (again click the arrow inside his picture to read and hear his talk at the same time)
In this MUST WATCH conference talk Elder Holland gives us a feel for the nature and love of God towards us (of course click the arrow). OK, let's get back to talking about the credibility of the theory of evolution!!!
Physics: The Big Bang, Astronomy, The Universe, Physical Constants, Etc.The article I will link to in a moment is one of those articles that was written to keep this home page from getting way too long. It has a lot of information in it.
This section has a link to an article that discusses six major topics about everything from the Big Bang to (the super genius Nichola Tesla) Tesla Physics:
This article is REQUIRED READING AND CONSIDER IT TO BE PART OF THE HOME PAGE. This article contains SOME OF THE BEST REASONS the theory of evolution is nonsense!!! For example, it links to an article on Astronomy:
While I link to the Astronomy article above, I would also like to add a link here due to its importance:
And don't forget this article - the Dictionary Of Astronomy And Cosmology:
Another List Of Reasons Why The Theory Of Evolution Cannot Be TrueSometimes you have to stop and ponder what has already been said (or will yet be said). This is yet another list of reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true. My lists may not always agree with each other. These are 7 top reasons why the theory of evolution cannot be true (i.e. the claim that God does not exist is false)!!! Well, every person would have their own list of top reasons. 1) The Sixteen Cells Paradox. This article proves, beyond any shadow of doubt, that all living things have spirits. The atheists and evolutionists claim there are no spirits and therefore there is no life after death. But this article proves that we would not be here if we did not have a spirit because DNA cannot be what is controlling cell divisions to create a new baby from a single, fertilized egg!!! 2) Astronomical Issues!!!!
The Big Bang!!! This actually includes three levels of issues: Another astronomical issue is that the star Betelgeuse has a radius 950-1,200 times the size of our Sun. But the star VY Canis Majoris, a red hypergiant star in the Canis Major constellation, is thought to be 1,540 times the size of our Sun!!! Here is my point: if VY Canis Majoris replaced our Sun its size would extend beyond the orbit of Saturn and our planet Earth would be inside the sun!!! So God had to put the right kind of star in the right solar system!!!
See this AMAZING, AMAZING YouTube video on star sizes (7 minutes and 17 million hits - YOU WILL LOVE THIS AMAZING VIDEO AND IT HAS GREAT MUSIC!!!!): 3) Viable permutations of nucleotides (i.e. the number of possible ways to sequence the nucleotides on 40 million DNA strands just for animals)!!! 4) The Two-male DNA alignment issue for all animal species!!! 5) The sophistication of all of the different kinds of cells which have been or are on this planet (for all species of all living things), then an extension of this issue (the next item): 6) The combination of how many different types of cells exist (for all species) and the sophisticated locations of each of the types of cells as each animal is created during cell divisions (i.e. from a single fertilized egg into the morphing of the baby to the birth of the baby) for every animal species. 7) The physical constants, and their incomprehensible accuracy, such as the Mass and Energy Of The Early Universe which must be accurate to within 10 to the power of 10 and that quantity to the power of 123!!! If the real constant were only slightly above or slightly below this number our Universe would not exist - including us)!!! Here is an axiom: The Sophistication Of An Object Cannot Exceed The Intelligence Of The Creator Of That Object!!!! There are no exceptions to this axiom!!! God is alive and well and WOW is He smart!!! And the theory of evolution is nothing but accidents and has no intelligence at all!!!!
The Beta-DNA Enzyme (A Cell Biology Issue)I inlcude this section not because it is relevant to this discussion, but because of two really cool images on a webpage. An enzyme is "a substance produced by a living organism which acts as a catalyst to bring about a specific biochemical reaction" (Google). "Enzymes can significantly speed up the rate of virtually all of the chemical reactions that take place within cells") (Google). Enzymes are one of those things that are absolutely needed in every cell.
Even the structure of the DNA for enzymes is an evidence of God's hands. See this image of the axis of the Beta-DNA or B-DNA enzyme DNA produced by Nobel Prize winner Dr. Francis Collins (this is not why he won his Nobel Prize) - Click Image to Magnify It: If you STUDY the right-hand image, you will know WHY, if the DNA of that enzyme is cut in half, like a rope, all of the scientists on this planet could not put the enzyme back together. Nor could accidents (i.e. evolution)!!!!! And the enzymes are inside of cells!!
If you want to have some fun, click on this link and try to read ALL of this online Abstract (I hope you have a sense of humor, I think it is funny): Did you realize that every once in awhile he or she used a word in the English language!!! There are people who actually understand that gibberish!!! If you had a PhD in cell biology you could easily understand that PubMed abstract. Now you know why so many people have PhD degrees in cell biology. Not only does God live, He is intelligent far beyond our imaginations. By the way, the author of that article lives in China. Click on the "Author information" link. I don't think reading that complete article in Chinese could possibly make it any harder to understand!!! In other words, if you had the English version side-by-side with the Chinese version, you would equally not understand either of them!! Some day I will learn how to tell the difference between sarcasm and being serious, but I am not in any hurry - I'm having too much fun.
|
|
Sperm Cells And Ova (i.e. Eggs)Just for terminology, an "ovum" is a single egg in a female animal. "Ova" is plural for ovum. An ovum is what gets fertilized (by a sperm cell) and this ovum divides and begins the massive number of cell divisions which create a baby of any animal species.
Let us dig deeper into the sperm cells and ova of humans in preparation for the next section: The female/mother has one or more ova (i.e. eggs) which are gender-neutral. It is the sperm cell (male sperm cell or female sperm cell) from the male, which gets to an ovum first, that will determine the sex of the baby!! There is literally a swimming race of sperm cells to get to an ovum first!!! The first one there wins and fertilizes the ovum. Ten million animal species had (if they are extinct) or have sperm cells that can swim!!!! So not only does "evolution" have to create and sequence DNA and create cells, it also must be able to create cells (sperm cells) which can swim and win a swimming race!!! This applies to all species.
The Four New DNA Strands Which Are Needed To Create Any New Animal Species From Scratch Or From An Existing SpeciesWhile it takes three kinds of DNA strands to maintain an existing species, it takes four new DNA strands to create a new species from an old species (though two of these can be the same kind) or to create a new species from scratch!!! Let's dig into this issue when a new species is being created from an existing species. Let us assume that humans evolved from bonobos. Here are the four bonobo DNA strands I am talking about which must evolve into four new and improved human DNA strands so that the human race can begin (the minimum two new human male sperm cells and the minimum two new human female ova must be completed in the same generation, latitude and longitude so the bonobo mother (or mothers) can give birth to two human children (a male and a female) who can grow up and have their own human children to start the human race!!! 1) Millions of mindless changes to a DNA strand in at least one bonobo male sperm cell in a male bonobo to create a human male sperm cell, 2) Millions of mindless changes to a DNA strand in at least one bonobo female sperm cell in a male bonobo to create a human female sperm cell, 3) Millions of mindless changes to a DNA strand in a gender-neutral ovum in a female bonobo to become DNA in a human ovum (for the first human male sperm cell to fertilize) to create a new human male baby, 4) Millions of mindless changes to a second DNA strand in a second gender-neutral ovum in a female bonobo to become DNA in a second human ovum (for the second human male sperm cell to fertilize) to create a new human female baby. How many male bonobos and how many female bonobos are involved is not important. What is important is that a male and female human baby are born to one or two bonobo mothers (items #3 and #4). If one male is involved this male must get two ovum impregnated. If one female is involved then this female must have both a male and female baby. So two, three or four bonobos could be involved in creating the human race. And after the millions of mindless changes (in each of these four cases) to start the human race the four new human DNA strands must align with each other at the function level!!! The probability of all of this happening, no matter how many males or how many females are involved, is not really important because the bigger problems are at the DNA level (e.g. permutations of nucleotides)!!! Also note that bonobos, like all mammals, would have many sperm cells involved in the swimming race to the ovum, most of which are bonobo sperm cells which have not been modified by evolution!!! So the two new human sperm cells must win the swimming race!!! This is just another gigantic bump in the road for the theory of evolution. There are also latitude, longitude and timeframe issues as I already mentioned. For example, if the first male human DNA strand was created by evolution one-thousand years before the first female human DNA strand was created by evolution and/or the two bonobo mothers lived 5,000 miles apart, you would not be reading this sentence (because you would not exist) if evolution were true!!! Plus, the bonobo parents (of the first human male and human female babies) must not kill or abandon their human babies because human babies are really funny-looking to bonobos (i.e. they do not look like their wonderful, beautiful bonobo children)!!! How would you like to marry a bonobo??? Well, no bonobo would want to be married to you or me!!! And the four new human DNA strands must align with each other at the function level before any human children can be born!!! Plus the new human couple, or their descendants, must eventually start having more than two human children so that the new human race can begin to grow in numbers!!! Now you are just beginning to understand some of the massive reasons why the theory of evolution is complete scientific nonsense!!! The probability that millions of mindless, random, accidental changes to each of four bonobo DNA strands could occur and that these random changes would create four vastly superior human DNA strands for the human race, and these many millions of changes must realistically be spread out over many generations (which is a major, major, major issue by itself) is both physically and mathematically and common sense absurd!!! And don't forget how many times we have talked about the fact that DNA cannot be changed while it is inside of a cell!! And don't forget that all four new human DNA strands must align with each other at the function level!! An almost completely new set of human cells must be created from bonobo cells. And none of the DNA segments can be pointed in the wrong direction, yet half of them will be pointed in the wrong direction!!! Yet the "evolution" of the DNA of the bonobo sperm cells and ova into human sperm cells and ova, and an almost entirely new set of cell types for the human babies, is precisely the foundation of the theory of evolution after the discovery of DNA in 1953!!! And there have been ten million animal species which currently live on this planet or have lived on this planet, all of which would need four new DNA strands (created from scratch or by randomly modifying the DNA of another species)!!! That is forty-million new and highly sophisticated DNA strands created by the mindless accidents of evolution without any evidence of failures in this process!!! By the way, only one million of these ten million species still exist. But that is not a defective DNA issue it is an issue of many species dying off (e.g. due to an inadequate food supply or being killed off by other species, etc.). If evolution were true, the Cambrian Explosion cannot be explained because evolution cannot create a new species with four new DNA strands which must align with each other (at the function level of course), much less create many new species in a short amount of time (which is the characteristic feature of the Cambrian Explosion, meaning the word "explosion" means: many new species were created in a relatively short amount of time)!!! Of course, the atheists and evolutionists will claim that this statistically impossible event happened by "evolution" (as if "evolution" had arms and legs and was massively, massively, massively smarter than humans)!!! And if the theory of evolution were true, a really, really, really good genealogist could trace our ancestry (species to species) back to the "first living cell". Well, they are probably busy enough that they don't need that assignment. In addition, monkeys and mice don't keep very good genealogy records. We can summarize the theory of evolution debate thusly: how can four DNA strands of one species be both physically and intelligently changed into four new and improved DNA strands for a new and improved species BY SOMETHING THAT DOESN'T EVEN EXIST (I.E. "EVOLUTION")???!!! And quite frankly, accidents aren't much smarter than Superman, but at least accidents can do tangible things!! Well, as far as sequencing DNA is concerned, humans aren't much smarter than Superman or accidents.
Moving A Segment Of DNA To Another Location on the DNA Strand (i.e. Cut And Join)The issues in this section are somewhat mentioned in the "Changing The Length Of A DNA Strand By Evolution/Accidents Is Impossible," which I would not expect that you have read yet, but this section focuses in on some key issues in that article and some key issues that are not in that article. Let us look at one of the issues that is deadly to the theory of evolution!!! The entire foundation of the theory of evolution is that one species can "evolve" into a new and improved species. But with the discovery of DNA the new claim of the evolutionists must be that four DNA strands of an existing species can randomly be changed into four new and improved DNA strands for a new and improved species!! These random, mindless changes to DNA are sometimes called "copy errors," but of course DNA damage does not have to occur during copying a DNA strand. "Evolution" assumes they can occur at any time even though cells take very good care of their DNA. So let us talk about random changes to a DNA strand!!! For example, in order to change the DNA of one species (bonobo DNA) into the DNA of a new and improved species (human DNA), millions of segments of DNA (on the bonobo DNA) would need to be moved, deleted and many brand new segments would need to be created from scratch because the segment is not on the bonobo DNA!!!! And every time a segment is moved or created from scratch, that segment must be pointed in the correct direction which has a 50% probability of happening!!!!! The atheists and evolutionist are really not very good at mathematics!!! And after these massive blind, deaf and brain-dead changes are made, the four new human DNA strands must align with each other at the function level. But let us focus on one of the bonobo DNA strands. I don't know how long a bonobo DNA strand is, but up until now we have assumed that human DNA is longer than bonobo DNA. But if human DNA is shorter than bonobo DNA, some segments of four bonobo DNA strands cannot be part of the four human DNA strands.
Let's dig deeper and look at a single "move" of a section/segment of DNA (on the bonobo DNA) to a specific location on the new human DNA strand (i.e. as part of changing bonobo DNA into human DNA): For new segments of DNA, which did not come from a bonobo, they must be created "from scratch". And as part of this, changes must be made to both bonobo male DNA strands and a different set of changes must be made to both bonobo female DNA strands. Now we need to emphasize some things. As we have talked about, at this point the segment being put on the human DNA strand, when joined, must "point in the right direction." In other words, suppose a segment ACGGTCC was moved from bonobo DNA to new human DNA. But let us suppose as it was floating around in the human cell that it was accidently put in backwords so that the new area where the segment was placed on the new human DNA strand had the segment CCTGGCA. That would cause a problem. And if many segments were "moved" there would be many cases where the segment went in backwards. This is another problem for "evolution." ACTUALLY, THIS IS DEADLY TO THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION BECAUSE: mathematically half of all bonobo DNA segments would be put in backwards when creating the four human DNA strands!!!! THAT IS A MATHEMATICAL FACT!!!!! At the peak of this process more than a million segments of DNA (most of them from the bonobo DNA strand but some of them would be new segments for the human DNA that did not come from the bonobos) would be floating around in the cell at the same time (it would take far too long to do this one segment at a time). How would the right segment find the right "slot" and point it in the right direction as the new human DNA strand was being created from a bonobo DNA strand??? And how did the new segments for the new human DNA strand, which did not exist on the bonobo DNA strand (and thus did not come from the bonobo DNA strand), get created inside of the new human cell??? Where did the nucleotides come from and how did they form into new segments while inside of a cell?? And they also must be pointed in the right direction after they are made and be put onto the new human DNA strand!! This means that at the peak of this process that the original DNA strand would be floating around in millions of different pieces and some of the segments would not be needed by the human DNA (but they were needed by the bonobo) and millions of brand new segments of DNA would be needed to create the new human species!!!!! And where do the segments of bonobo DNA, which are not needed by the human DNA, go??? The only place they can go is in the cell. And these segments would interfere with getting the correct segments in the correct location. And all of these millions of changes to bonobo DNA must happen to each of four bonobo DNA strands!!! But the changes will not be identical for all four DNA strands. Only two of them could be identical with each other (the two female DNA strands).
In other words the new human cell would include (in a human sperm cell or human ovum): All of this, and much more (e.g. timeframes, latitude, longitude), is proof that the theory of evolution is total nonsense after the discovery of DNA because, in many cases, evolution would require millions of changes to each of four old DNA strands to create four new and improved DNA strands for a new and improved species!!! Wow, let's change speeds and talk about something simple - physics.
|
|
More On The Sophistication Of Human DNA (And The Spirit)A human DNA strand is seven feet long, but it is coiled up to fit inside of a cell that cannot be seen with the naked eye!!! This DNA strand is combined with, and used by, the spirit of the new baby. The new baby is made of roughly 37.2 trillion cells which includes 60,000 miles of blood vessels, etc. I do not know if spirits have blood vessels, but maybe they do?? Or maybe that is one of those DNA things the spirit doesn't deal with. The 60,000 miles of blood vessels in this newborn baby would wrap around the earth at the equator twice, with 10,000 miles of blood vessels left over!! But if the blood vessels of this new baby were not fullly enclosed, before blood starts to flow, the fetus would bleed to death!!! So timing is EVERYTHING!!!! At four weeks after conception, the new baby is growing at one million cells a second!!! Ponder these things for a moment, we are talking about a human baby!!! When the baby is born he or she will have an incredible brain which is connected to a massive nervous system, a skull to protect the brain, a spine to protect the spinal cord (which is a cylindrical bundle of nerve fibers), two eyes which are connected to the nervous system which can see in 3-D, a beating heart, a liver, a pancreas, 300 bones (which eventually fuse into 206 bones), etc. etc.!! The DNA in a sperm cell of the father of the baby contributes part of the DNA for the new baby and the DNA in the mother's ovum (egg) contributes part of the DNA for the new baby. The DNA strands include databases from the mother's DNA and father's DNA which must align with each other at the function level and are accessed by the spirit of the new baby!!! But it is even more complicated than that. Men actually have two types of DNA strands: the DNA in the "male sperm cells" which will lead to a male baby and the DNA in the "female sperm cells" which will lead to a female baby. The DNA in each mother's egg/ovum is gender-neutral. So if a male sperm cell penetrates the mother's egg first (along with its DNA), a male baby will result. If a female sperm cell penetrates the mother's egg first (along with its DNA), a female baby will result. The sex of the baby is literally a swimming race of sperm cells to penetrate an ovum first!! You will have to sit down and ponder the rest of this paragraph - it is mind-numbing: so a male sperm cell can create a male baby who eventually grows into an adult male body which can create its own male sperm cells!!! Are you serious??!! A male sperm cell can lead to the creation of a male body which can itself create male sperm cells!!! Something is wrong with this picture??? I would like the atheists and evolutionists to explain that!!! Have I mentioned that God is smart??? And how do you make a sperm cell that can swim from a string of nucleotides (i.e. the DNA of the baby at conception)??? Remember, the baby starts out as a single fertilized egg (i.e. cell) and the sperm cells are not part of the baby's infrastructure of cells!!!
Comparing The Creation Of DNA (Supposedly Created By Evolution) To The Creation of Computer Programs (Created By Humans)The process of writing real computer programs can teach us a lot about the process of evolution which has supposedly written highly sophisticated DNA (none of which are understood by humans) forty million of times (to create ten million new animal species) without any brains or known errors in the DNA of any of the ten million animal species!!!
If computer programmers wrote computer programs the way that evolution must sequence DNA strands (using nothing but mindless accidents), there would not be a single, functional computer program on this planet!!! Here is an article on that subject:
Here is another article about comparing writing computer programs to the creation of DNA:
Here is a companion article which asks: why do we need computer programmers?: But of course evolution (if it were real) would have the added burden (which computer programmers do not have) of aligning the DNA of four DNA databases (i.e. four DNA strands), at the function level when creating a new species from an old species. The father's two new DNA strands (when creating a new species) and the mothers two new DNA strands (ditto) must align with each other at the function level and these four DNA strands must be exactly the same length in each section (and subsection) because every human baby gets part of its DNA from its mother and part of its DNA from its father!!! I would like to see four teams of computer programmers who are given the same assignment to independently (the members of each team are not allowed to communicate or collaborate with anyone in any of the other teams in order to simulate the stupidity of evolution) write four massively complex computer programs with exactly the same objectives. In other words, each team of computer programmers must write a computer program to achieve the goals set by the referee. Each computer program, written by a different team (the members of a team of course are not allowed to talk to members of other teams to simulate evolution), must create a binary string (i.e. a complied computer program)!!! When done the four binary strings (i.e. object code) of the four computer programs, written independently by four different teams of computer programmers who do not compare notes between teams, must align with each other (at the function level) meaning all four of the binary programs must be exactly the same length for each functional section (e.g. subroutine) and overall!!! Obviously the four computer program object codes would not align in the slightest!!! But that is only half of the issues. In the second test there are four different random number generators (written by four different teams of programmers) which can randomly write "binary code" to be executed directly by a computer. These random number generator programs must write the binary code for the four computer programs just mentioned. When done, these four programs would not align with each other in any way, nor would any of these programs do anything useful. None of these last four "programs" would have any function, nor would they align with each other at the function level!!! Nor would any four DNA strands randomly squenced by the brainless evolution!!! Nor would four DNA strands, written by brainless evolution, supposedly to create a brand new species, create anything useful!!! While DNA is primarily a database that does not make the problems for evolution any easier. Random is random.
Another TestLet us dig deeper. Suppose evolution/accidents tried to create four new male and female human DNA strands from four male and female bonobo DNA strands. Remember, evolution requires four new and improved DNA strands to create a new and improved species, in this case humans. Suppose the DNA strand created by evolution for the first human male sperm cell was fine (which is impossible). But suppose the DNA created by evolution for the second human male sperm cell had only 95% of the length of the DNA for the first human male sperm cell!! And what if the first female DNA strand for the first human female ovum was only 90% as long as the DNA for the first human male sperm cell!! And what if the second female DNA strand for the second human female ovum was only 85% as long as the DNA for the first human male sperm cell!!
We wouldn't be here if evolution were true!!! As we have already done, let us define a "field" to be a very specific segment of DNA which creates a very specific enzyme or has some other very specific function needed by the cell. A human DNA strand would require many more "fields" than a bonobo DNA strand would need, such as in the creation of the human brain. This means that in the conversion of bonobo DNA into human DNA there would be many more "fields" of DNA segments (not just individual nucleotides). Each "field" must be the same length, and in the same location/sequence, on all four new human DNA strands!!! The probability that four randomly created human DNA strands (randomly created by the pure accidents of evolution by modifying bonobo DNA), after millions of changes to their original bonobo DNA (to create the human species), would be the same length as each other and that all four DNA strands would align at the function and field levels is total nonsense!! This certainly would not be the case when the human brain was created from a bonobo brain because humans would have far more "fields" in their brain DNA than bonobos.
And never forget that half of all segments would be pointed in the wrong direction!!!!! My point is that the four human DNA strands created by evolution WOULD PROBABLY NOT EVEN HAVE THE SAME LENGTH AS EACH OTHER!!! In other words, if four bonobo DNA strands "evolved" into four human DNA strands, the "fields" would not be the same "fields" and the "fields" would not be in the same location or in the same order or be pointed in the same direction or be the same length (because everything was done randomly)!!! And keep asking yourself: where are the failures of evolution???
Humans And Chimpanzees - A Common Ancestor???
You have to admire the creativity of the atheists and evolutionists in their attempts to get new converts. They never give up!!! Let me quote from another website obviously written by an evolutionist (the coloring is mine):
I am not exactly what sure he/she means by the phrase: "we share about 99% of our DNA". Obviously 99% of bonobo DNA and 99% of human DNA are not the same sequence of nucleotides nor would the components have the same functions!! Also note that they are talking about percentages, not sequences of nucleotides!!!
Here is a quote from another website: "Despite the similarities in human and chimp genomes, the scientists identified some 40 million differences among the three billion DNA molecules, or nucleotides, in each genome." This also doesn't make any sense. If anyone concludes that chimpanzees have 96% of the intelligence of humans, they have been sniffing something!!! Because scientists have no clue what DNA is used for (well, they do know about genes), how in the world can they come to these conclusions!!! It is clearly a play on words. Remember, as the Sixteen Cells Paradox explains, DNA has almost nothing to do with cell divisions!!! DNA only tweeks what the spirit does. The atheists and evolutionists do not believe in spirits (e.g. life after death) so they think that DNA does everything. This is nonsense for many reasons!!! However, because DNA is primarily a database there may be more similarities than a person would expect than if DNA was a computer program to control the cell divisions. So perhaps what these scientists discovered, without knowing it, is that DNA is a primarily a database!!! The concept of "common ancestor" is totally based on the assumption that evolution is true and that DNA can be changed!!! Well, our DNA does have something in common with chimpanzee DNA!!! Listen to this carefully: we have a common designer - God!!! Computer programmers reuse subroutines all the time in source code!!! When God designed the DNA for humans and chimpanzees He may have used some sections of DNA more than once. God is efficient. This method is also common, for example, with those who design automobiles as they would occasionally use common parts from an old model car in the new model car. This saves money for the automobile manufacturer. Or there could be other reasons that God (or some of His children He assigned the task before Adam and Eve were put on this planet - we were spirits back then) used "common parts" on DNA. The point is that the fact that DNA cannot be changed while it is inside of a cell (to create a new species from an old species) is VERY IMPORTANT when thinking about the claims of the atheists and evolutionists. This is just an example of how the atheists and evolutionists assume evolution is true in order to create their "evidence" that evolution is true!!! To put it another way, anyone can prove anything if their clever terminology (e.g. "common ancestor") bypasses the massive scientific problems with their claims (e.g. that evolution is true). It amounts to "proof by using clever terminology and making massive assumptions" - such as by claiming that humans and chimpanzees have a common ancestor!! Let me repeat that in a different way: the atheists and evolutionists assume that the theory of evolution is true as part of their "evidence" that the theory of evolution is true!!! The fact that there is a massive difference in intelligence between human intelligence and bonobo intelligence, yet if our DNA differences are not that great (which I very seriously question), is a massive proof that humans and bonobos have spirits and that the difference in our intelligence is mostly, if not entirely, because of our spirits, not our DNA-based databases!!! In other words, our spirit is where our real brain is and it is our spirit that controls cell divisions (ditto for bonobos and every other animal)!!! Our DNA contains primarily a database of information about the father and mother so that the baby will have features of both parents. I should note that if our DNA controlled out brain then Judgment Day would not be just. So knowing that DNA is a database, not a computer program, would make it easy for human DNA to be very similar to bonobo DNA!!! Let me repeat that: So knowing that DNA is a database, not a computer program, would make it easy for human DNA to be very similar to bonobo DNA!!! Do not forget that DNA is "irreducibly complex," meaning every section and sequence has to work the first time!!! Evolution cannot rewrite a section of DNA that was not quite right the first time and then insert it back into the DNA where it belongs (after cutting out the bad section)!!! Especially for four DNA strands!!! Here is Google's definition of "irreducibly complex": An irreducibly complex system cannot be produced directly (that is, by continuously improving the initial function, which continues to work by the same mechanism) by slight, successive modifications of a precursor system, because any precursor to an irreducibly complex system that is missing a part is by definition ... [End Definition] This is important: try telling a group of computer programmers that they are not allowed to change the source code of a massively sophisticated computer program, written from scratch, after the first draft is written!!! They would not be happy at all!!! But God gets it right the first time!!! That is why you don't see any evidence of dead, mutated species whose DNA and cell types and cell locations were not quite right the first time!!! Where are the errors of evolution??? If evolution were true (and the sequence of nucleotides on all DNA strands were randomly created) there would be massively, massively more dead and mutated animals (which never even became alive) than there are atoms in this Universe!!! I love this paragraph from the permutations article:
That is a statistical fact due to the rarity of viable permutations!!! Thinking about evolution - a DNA strand has no way to tell whether its sequence is "correct" or not, nor does it care - DNA itself is as dumb as a rock and would have no motivation for survival because it has no goals. But even if one animal feels inferior to another animal (in terms of survival skills) the inferior animal cannot retroactively change its own DNA so that it's offspring are smarter and stronger in future generations (assuming DNA controlled cell divisions, which it does not)!!! An animal doesn't know that its DNA is part of the reasons why it is inferior to another species!!! Nor could it fix its own DNA even if it knew that DNA was the problem!!! Well, of course a less sophisticated spirit of an animal is the main reason why one animal is inferior to another animal!!! The atheists and evolutionists seem to claim that by "thinking we need something" (such as a better brain or stronger muscles) our DNA will be changed so that our children will be smarter and stronger than we are. NOPE!!!! Mathematics doesn't work that way.
A Little More About CellsI wasn't kidding when I said that a team of cell biologists could create a website several times larger than this website just talking about cells!!! Thousands of scientists have PhD degrees in "Cell Biology" or Microbiology!! Cells are not simple!! So how could a person with a PhD in Cell Biology or Microbiology think for one instant that cells, and what goes on inside of cells, were created purely by accidents???!!! Well, if they are arrogant enough to believe there is no God they have no other choice!!! Pride is a massive, massive, massive element in the evolution debate!!! Many scientists are so proud that they refuse to believe that a God could exist who is massively smarter than they are!!!
Here is an article about the sophistication of cells - very interesting stuff (this has some YouTube videos): I am not sure what his complaint about the Big Bang is so I have no comment on that. The Big Bang obviously did happen. Maybe he was saying it was not an accident. I agree with that. Or perhaps he didn't know about the discovery of Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation.
Here is the bottom line: the scientific evidence is overwhelming that accidents have not created a single cell or a single DNA strand or a single galaxy or Universe!! Nor have accidents intelligently sequenced the nucleotides on any DNA strand!! The entire foundation of the theory of evolution is scientific nonsense!! Here is my article on Cell Biology and Microbiology, which I linked to above: Trust me: God is alive and well and He is a heck of a lot smarter than any of us!! And because we are His children (e.g. our spirits may be assigned to Him if spirits cannot be created) we have a lot more potential than we can conceive now!!! God loves most of His children (well, I doubt He loves the potential sons of perdition or the potential "like unto the son of perdition" people unless they repent in time)!!!
|
|
The Magnitude Of The Problems With The Theory Of EvolutionThe biggest problem I have with maintaining this website is keeping track of all of the reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true!!! It is literally humanly impossible to constantly be changing articles every time I come up with another reason evolution cannot be true (or I find more reasons in an old article or old notebook that I have not looked at in years). The above items are just a few of the hundreds of scientific reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true which are discussed on this website. But I should emphasize that the MAGNITUDE of the reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true is simply beyond comprehension. The permutation issues of the DNA for several million species, all of which have or had (if they are extinct) both males and females, alone would eliminate any chance that the theory of evolution is true. That is forty-million DNA strands (four for each animal species which has existed or currently exists) to create the ten million animal species which do exist or have existed!!! And this is just for animals!!! And the construction of roughly two billion different kinds of animal cells (considering all animal species) which must be in exact locations on the body (during the morphing of the embryo)!!! Each animal, plant and insect species probably has many unique types of cells which apply only to that species!!! And each of these types of cells must be in exactly the correct location starting with a single seed or a single fertilized egg!!! For example, every animal species which has ever existed needed or needs highly sophisticated transparent cells in their eyes so they can see!!! Well, maybe not bats, I don't know. And where are the failures of the brainless evolution??? Even experienced computer programmers, with very good brains, almost always have to write several drafts of a new computer program being written from scratch!!! The longer and more complex a new computer program is the more drafts will be needed!!! But there is no evidence that God needed any extra drafts to create the DNA and cells for a single animal species!!! In other words, there is zero evidence of failures in DNA sequences or in creating cells or in the process of putting the cells together for all of the animal, plant and insect species on this planet via cell divisions!!! Do not look at each reason the theory of evolution cannot be true as being equal with the other reasons. Some reasons are massive enough, by themselves to make the theory of evolution completely ludicrous!!! Now I want to make it very clear that many students have been fooled by the atheists and evolutionists. This is nothing to be ashamed of!!! The atheists and evolutionists have perfected the art of deception, they are well-organized, very well-funded and their deceptions are highly polished!!! Atheists don't want a God to exist because a God would be massively smarter than they are. So most of them do everything in their vivid imaginations to pretend there is no God and to claim that everything in the Universe came to exist by pure chance. God is replaced by mindless accidents!!! Here is something to think about: if God had our intelligence (or the intelligence of Richard Dawkins as an example), we would not exist!!! So the existence of Richard Dawkins is an absolute proof that God lives!!! I'll bet he didn't see that one coming!!! Of course, many teachers are required to teach the theory of evolution even though they may not believe in the theory of evolution. This is because judges do not need to pass a test in Cell Biology before they get sworn in!!! Maybe it should be required in the future!!! Maybe a person should not be allowed to be a judge (at all levels of judges, including the U.S. Supreme Court) unless they can pass the same test a graduate school student in Cell Biology must pass in their final exams for their PhD!!! Oh yea, they also must explain how pure accidents created bonobo DNA and cell types and cell locations which eventually became human DNA and cell types and cell locations!!! That would fix a lot of problems with the Republican/Democrat debates. But this plan would not work because if a person had all of this information they would likely become very proud and pride is precisely what creates atheists and evolutionists meaning pride overrules a knowledge of obvious scientific facts!!! My point is that the atheists win in the schools because of incredibly stupid judges!!!! I guarantee that teaching atheism in school was not the intention of the founding fathers of America!!!! By the way, the constitution was written in 1787, more than 70 years before Darwin's first evolution book was published in 1859!!!
Here is an article which will grow in numbers (e.g. numbers of reasons evolution cannot be true) as I get time to go through the many notebooks (and old versions of the home page) where I have written down many ideas about why the theory of evolution cannot be true:
Here is the article with more than 400 reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true which is also linked to in the Quick Links article:
My List Of The Gigantic Reasons Why Evolution Is FalseIt is far beyond the scope of this home page to talk about many subjects. But trust me: the probability of a viable permutation of nucleotides, to create both a male and female for a single advanced species (the permutation of nucleotides on the DNA would have to be almost perfect in order to create a living baby of any animal species). Remember, if there is no God and no spirits, then DNA would have to be what controls cell divisions!!!! The issue of permutations of nucleotides is the real death of the theory of evolution!!!!! This is not an issue that can be "explained away" with fancy storytelling and vivid imaginations!!! It is pure mathematics!!!! The statistical problems created by permutations of nucleotides make the theory of evolution look very, very bad!!! Here is an interesting paradox: which came first the cell or the DNA inside that cell?? If the DNA came first, how did a cell get created and then the DNA get put inside of this cell without damaging the cell wall and the DNA?? If the cell came first, there is nothing inside of a cell that can create a DNA strand or even modify it, much less sequence it. In summary, here is yet another list of the top reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true. I guess I want to prove to people that I can count to ten: 1) The Big Bang. This is all about raw power!!! No one has a clue how the object that exploded, which contained all of the atoms in the Universe, could be compressed so much (perhaps down to the size of a basketball)!!! And then how was this incredibly dense object "exploded??" Inseperable to this item are the physical constants, particularly the gravitational constant!!! 2) Surprisingly, my first cell-related reason that the theory of evolution cannot be true has absolutely nothing to do with permutations of nucleotides or putting the correct type of cell in the correct location at the right time!!! The #2 reason that God is alive and well is The Sixteen Cells Paradox!!!! What this paradox proves is that it is impossible that DNA can control cell divisions!!! "Impossible" is worse than any probability. What it proves is that spirits exist (the atheists and evolutionists don't like that)!! Without spirits (and the atheists and evolutionists will never believe in spirits until they die) there would be no living animal on this planet because DNA, by itself, cannot control cell divisions!!!! When your spirit leaves your body, "you" will be a spirit on this planet along with many billions of other spirits. Who wants to live in a grave anyway?? 3) Obtaining a viable permutation of nucleotides on DNA, that could create a human baby (or even be a database for the spirit), is statistically impossible. Considering all animal species it would be far more likely to pick a single atom which is hidden among many, many quadrillions of Universes for all living things to exist via random permutations of nucleotides (asssuming DNA controls cell divisions). This is NOT an exaggeration!! Permutation issues (considering all animal species) are the #3 reason the theory of evolution cannot be true!!! 4) There are roughly two billion of types of cells among the 10 million animal species which have existed or currently exist. All of the scientists on this planet cannot create a single cell, much less create a single living cell from scratch. 5) Getting the right type of cell in the right location in the body of any animal as the animal morphs from a single fertilized egg, is statistically impossible. 6) Creating DNA from scratch (e.g. for the "first living cell") is impossible for many reasons (however, humans can do this, but they do not know how to sequence the nucleotides), 7) Atoms. Scientists cannot create a single atom!!! Yet the Universe is full of atoms!!! Roughly 1080 atoms!!! Can scientists create a single atom from scratch?? Well, what raw materials would they make it from??? It is safe to say that sientists will never make an atom from the aether. In fact, God had to create atoms as part of the Big Bang or after the Big Bang!!! Wow!!! 8) Creating life from non-life is impossible and has never been done (though it has been attempted), 9) Creating the mechanisms in the cell, which use the DNA as patterns to create proteins, is impossible to happen by accident. For example, how does this mechanism know WHERE on the DNA a specific protein code is located and how does it FIND THAT SECTION?? If scientists know the answers to these two questions, and I suspect they do, how can they claim that these mechanisms came to exist by accident?? WHERE ARE THE KEY SECTIONS OF DNA issue is a topic by itself), 10) The Two-Male DNA Alignment problem for the theory of evolution is another massive, massive reason evolution cannot be true. Let me make a few more observations. Just ask any computer programmer how long it would take to write a complex computer program using code written exclusively by random number generators to simulate evolution. It would never happen!! And "evolution" is a heck of a lot slower than computers!!!
Bar charts are a very good way to compare intelligence to no intelligence. Look at each bar chart in this chapter in one of the free eBooks on this website (you do not need to read the chapter, just look at the bar charts) and then look carefully at the last bar chart to see a histogram of pure randomness/accidents (i.e. a histogram of what evolution would create every time!!!) - be sure to click the "+" sign several times): Yes, the flat bar chart is exactly what evolution / accidents would create every time. No living thing could exist with a flat bar chart. More is said about this issue in the two "Kehr's Paradox" articles. In short, "evolution" has the intelligence of Superman and every DNA strand created by "imaginary evolution" or by real accidents would have roughly an equal number of A, C, G and T nucleotides assuming that evolution has equal access to an equal and unlimited number of each type of nucleotide!!! So if humans cannot sequence and create from scratch DNA or RNA (well they can create DNA, but they cannot sequence it), plus a cell for the DNA or RNA to exist inside, and give their new cell "life," with a new spirit and a viable permutation of nucleotides to provide information for the spirit, why would anyone believe that a series of pure accidents (i.e. evolution) could have created the "first living cell" in a sterile pond (Note: by definition, before the "first living cell" there was no life and nothing for the "first living cell" to eat except dirt, rocks and water)?? I should emphasize that if there was no God and no spirits that DNA sequences would be the only thing that could control cell divisions!!!! But the length of human DNA is nowhere near long enough to control the cell locations which create a human baby from a single fertilized egg. In order for evolution to be true: accidents would have to be many thousands of times smarter than humans!!!!!!! Let me repeat that: In order for evolution to be true: accidents would have to be many thousands of times smarter than humans!!!!!!!
What A Student Should Not Do!!So what should a student do when they realize the theory of evolution is complete scientific nonsense?? It is definitely not advisable for a student to argue with their teacher, but there is nothing wrong with a student quietly going "online" and learning the truth about the absurdity of the theory of evolution because of the sophistication of DNA and the sophistication of the cells that the DNA resides inside of, among many other reasons (e.g. the physical constants, at least one of which was critical for the creation of this Universe)!!! Just quietly, and low key, spread the word among your friends. Definitely mention this website if a teacher gets involved!!! Have your teacher email me if they have any questions or comments (my email address is at the bottom of this home page). I will be happy to answer his or her questions and I would appreciate their comments if they think I say something wrong. I am human after all so I might be wrong on some issues. In fact, I have made changes to this website based on user comments. Well, I don't look at my emails every day so it may take some time for get back to you.
Evolution From The "First Living Cell" To Human DNA (A Major, Major Section!!!)If you were going to build an ocean liner you might start with building a single bolt. Well, if evolution were true, the first thing evolution would have created would not have been a Woolly Mammoth, it would have been a single cell, which is defined to be the "first living cell." Ditto for humans: humans were not the first living thing on this planet!!! For one thing, humans would have had nothing to eat if we were created first by God or evolution. The "Garden of Eden" existed before Adam and Eve existed. There is a reason the garden was made first!!! Plants love dirt. Humans hate eating dirt. We now know that human DNA is 3,200,000,000 nucleotides long. Let us assume that the length of the "first living cell" was 10,000 nucleotides long. At an average increase in length of 15,000 nucleotides scattered throughout the DNA strand for each new species, there would have been 213,333 intermediate species between the "first living cell" and human DNA!!! And once the first "animal" was created by evolution, each "new" animal species would have needed four new and improved DNA strands and many different and/or new cell types!!! And at some point, starting with the first animal species which had both a male and female, male DNA and female DNA had to "evolve" independently from there on. In other words, for each new species four new and improved DNA strands would need to align with each other at the function level - independent of each other - for each new species!!! Now let's see if yours and mine great, great, great, ..., great grandmother was the "first living cell"!!!
Did Humans Evolve From The First Living Cell (We Had To If Evolution Were True)???Let us start thinking about whether humans beings "evolved" from the "first living cell." First, let us remember, that if there was no God, there would be no spirits to control cell divisions, so all cell divisions, and all new DNA strands at each level, would have had to come to exist purely by the brainless accidents of evolution. In addition, something must explain the Sixteen Cells Paradox once animals start showing up!!! This is because the atheists don't believe in spirits. How did the DNA of the first human father and the DNA of the first human mother "evolve" together (i.e. at the length and function of DNA level) from the "first living cell?" And how were the four DNA strands synchronized, for each species after slightly improved species, as the DNA of the males and females evolved independently for millions of years?? And don't forget the latitude, longitude and timeframe issues!!! And where are the massive, massive, massive numbers of failures in creating new DNA caused by invalid permutations of nucleotides when creating four new and improved DNA strands for each new and improved animal species??? And to compliment what I said above: suppose the male DNA evolved slightly faster (say 1% faster) than the female DNA evolved (or vice versa). Within several new species their DNA would not align and they would not have been able to have any children that survived because their DNA was not compatible!! That species would be the end of evolution for that line. So four new DNA strands (two from an existing male and two from an existing female of the same species), starting with the first animal (which evolved from the "first living cell"), must evolve together for species after species after species after species and each new sequential species needed four DNA strands (i.e. two from each of two animals, a male and female) which were "created" in the same latitude, longitude and timeframe!!! However, you could not create a new animal species from the altered DNA of a male animal in Nigeria and a female animal in Norway!!!! The male and female must find each other and be in exactly the same location (latitude and longitude) in order to mate!!! In other words, not only are there issues with DNA and cells, the latitutde and longitude must be correct for 10,000 new animal species as they are created by evolution!!! God doesn't have that problem because he can travel from anywhere in this Universe to a specific latitude and longitude on this planet virtually instantly!!! But more likely He deligated each species to someone else to create the DNA and cells for. So latitude and longitude issues heavily affect the theory of evolution, but they do not affect God or those that He assigned tasks to!!! But even thinking about these things, the atheists/evolutionists (considering all of the problems with creating a single new species from an existing species) are not going to change!!! I don't think the atheists and evolutionists are very good at mathematics. Male DNA and female DNA had to be designed by God, for each species with a male and female!! Evolution could never have designed four new massively sophisticated computer programs/databases (DNA) that could be integrated together to create a new species. And evolution certainly could not have done it in the same timeframe and same locations on the earth. And don't forget the unique set of cell types needed by each species!!! Not only would the DNA be constantly changing (as evolution progressed), but the set of cell types and combinations of cell types and locations of cell types in the bodies of new species would constantly be changing!!! You will never see the above several paragraphs in a science book or biology book at the high school or college level!!! The only thing the authors of these books want is more converts to atheism and to sell more books!!!
How About Teaching Good Science In Schools!!!!Here is a novel idea, why don't most science and biology teachers teach good science in schools???
This article is about that question:
Cell Biology Books, Some Written By Creation ScientistsI would love to have a staff of people dig through all of the pro-evolution and anti-evolution books which have been printed. I am sure I would learn many, many things from the anti-evolution books and websites. Cells are so sophisticated that the average person would have to go to school for a couple of years just to understand a basic document about the sophistication of cells written by a PhD in Cell Biology of Microbiology!!! I don't know how many cell biology books mention "evolution," but the sophistication of cells is clearly a proof that evolution is nonsense. I own a giant textbook on Cell Biology which is called: The World Of The Cell, Fourth Edition, by Becker, Kleinsmith and Hardin. This textbook is 845 pages. I also own a book called The Dictionary of Cell and Molecular Biology by J.M. Lackie. It is 725 pages and the print is small. Many people, but not all, in these fields (including students) are incredibly proud to the point that they do not believe in God. But they are not the ones who designed and built these cells!!!! While most, but not all, cell biology books are pro-evolution, they are good for something. They clearly prove that there are thousands of reasons the theory of accidents cannot be true due to the sophistication of cells; and this does not include the many issues created purely by the DNA in almost all cells!!
I also own two advanced books which were written by "creation scientists" [yes, people who openly admit that they believe in God also write books] and I am sure there are many other creation science books on this topic: These two men obviously believe that God had to create the many different kinds of cells on this earth (all species are made of cells) because they could not have been created by accidents. Here is a "beginners" book about cell biology: The Cell's Design by Fazale Rana. This is a creation science book (i.e. an apologetics book). Every microorganism on this planet is far more sophisticated than any jet airplane on this planet!!! It is not even close!!! If all of the cells on this planet were taken away from this planet there would not be a single living thing on this planet, not even a bacteria!!!
What is Life? (A Very, Very Important Section That Atheists/Evolutionists Have No Answer For)"Life" is a major problem for the theory of evolution. Because the atheists/evolutionists do not believe in God they do not believe that any living thing has a "spirit" or has any life after death because they believe there are no spirits!! Let us look at the issue: "what is life?" For example, if you took a fish and left it out of the water until it died, and then an hour after it died you put it back into the water, why doesn't it come back to life? All of the raw elements for life (including all of the DNA and cells) are still functional and still in the fish, so why doesn't it come back to life? I cannot imagine that a cell in the fish would die as quickly as the fish itself dies. So all of the cells in the fish would be alive when the fish is put back into the water. There is something more to "life" than just cells and oxygen and water. That would be a spirit!!! When the spirit leaves, there is no way to bring an animal back to life unless God allows the spirit to return (after it had left). Furthermore, have the evolutionists and atheists ever proven that life can be created from non-life (i.e. inorganic materials)?? Never, never, never - yet they continue to preach atheism. While several attempts have been made to create life from non-life (e.g. Miller-Urey, Wong, et. al. and Hartgerink), the scientists have not only failed to create life, they have also failed to prove it can be done!! The term "biogenesis" means that living things only arise from other living things.
Here is a different creation science website which has an excellent article on this subject: Have scientists put a large shell over a pond, which had no life, meaning there was no DNA and no cells (this simulates "prebiotic" conditions, meaning "existing before life"), and observed "life" form by a series of accidents, including RNA or DNA inside of a "first living cell" (in that pond), that was alive and had the ability to divide itself into two cells (which would be required for complex life to survive and evolve) and the cells had to have something to eat (by definition, and by context, the "first living cell" could only eat things that did not have any cells)!!! Try living on that diet!! Actually, that experiment could never be done because it would be impossible to prove there is no life in any pond before beginning the experiment!!! The experiment would have to be done indoors starting with a very, very, very sterile environment with no possible chance that any living thing from outside could get inside. In addition, even the "first living cell" (if it is our ancestor), or it's single-celled descendants, had to eventually divide into two cells (etc.) for animal life to exist!!! How could something that simple divide into two cells?? The "warm pond" thing has no credibility. I don't think the temperature of the water can overcome the statistical problems with creating a living cell, which can divide into two cells (and have something to eat that is not made out of rocks), using the mindless accidents of evolution!!! And don't forget the physical constants, and the incredible accuracy needed by some of them!!! These could not have come to exist by chance!! Then what is their evidence for evolution? Their only evidence is that many scientists are very arrogant and they do not believe in God and thus they have no choice except to use their God-given brains to deceive people into believing that everything in the Universe (including the Universe itself), including human DNA, occurred by chance. But the theory of evolution should have been thrown in the trash can when DNA was discovered and when the complexity of cells was also discovered. Yet, as scientists learn more and more about DNA and cells, the atheists continue to cling to the theory of evolution as if it were still 1859, when Darwin's first book on evolution was published.
Every new discovery leads to a new fairy tale to explain how something came to exist by accident. Just like gasoline fuels a car, pride and popularity fuel of the theory of evolution!!! The only thing that is "evolving" on this planet is the theory of evolution as evolutionists/atheists constantly need to develop new spin to account for the new discoveries about the sophistication of cells and their attempts to figure out what DNA is used for (this is difficult for them because they do not beieve in spirits)!!! Actually, the atheists and evolutionists make no attempt to explain how accidents could have created any living thing on this planet. It is much easier to just give "evolution" the credit and to mock and ignore anyone who is not an atheist. Mocking people who believe in God requires a lot less work and a lot less money than research!!! I should repeat that about a thousand times!!! There are so many atheists and evolutionists in just about every college in America that everyone assumes you are an atheist and evolutionist. It is the norm. It is the creation scientists who are the oddballs - even though the creation scientists are correct!!! I cannot even begin to explain how much pride is the foundation of the theory of evolution!!!
Can Accidents Or Simplicity (In General) Create Complexity?As one example of complexity, the human eyes are unbelievable in complexity. Yet the sections on human DNA which create the human eyes must be far more complex than the eyes themselves (this is assuming there are no spirits which the atheists claim)!! And the intelligence who designed the DNA (God) must be far more complex than the DNA itself!! In other words, simplicity never creates complexity. Intelligence is top-down, not bottom-up!!! Let me repeat that, simplicity never creates complexity. Intelligence is top-down, not bottom-up!!! To understand these concepts, consider these items:
First, consider that a human-designed computer program exists because: 1) The human intelligence to design and build the microprocessor, including designing and building the memory chips. 2) The human intelligence to write the operating system for the computer. 3) The human intelligence to design the computer language. 4) The human intelligence to write the computer program. 5) The human intelligence to write the "compiler" to convert what the programmer writes into a usable information. 6) The human intelligence to run the compiler and then to execute the program. Second, consider the output of the computer program which is printed on a piece of paper. Here is the question: how can the printout on the piece of paper be more sophisticated than the human intelligence needed to design and create the microprocessor (and memory chips), design and write the computer language, design and write the operating system and complier, design and write the computer program, etc.?? It can't!! Let's think about the memory chips in computers. My son John retired from working for Micron, which is a company in Idaho that makes memory chips. At times he would be monitoring the creation of memory chips. The company he worked for had about five-billion dollars worth of equipment which were needed to create memory chips!!! The memory chips cannot be more complex than the machines that made them, and the machines that made them cannot be more complex than the humans who designed them and the humans who built them!! Simplicity cannot create complexity!! There has never been a functional, useful machine (or computer program) on this planet that was not designed and built by human beings!! Not a single one of them was written by a random number generator to simulate evolution!! Let me repeat that: There has never been a functional, useful machine (or computer program) on this planet that was not designed and built by human beings!! Not a single one of them was designed and the instructions written by a random number generator to simulate evolution!! But "evolution" is just the opposite. It starts with something too small to see with the naked eyes (e.g. a First Living Cell) and over time, using nothing but pure, mindless accidents, species got stronger, larger, more intelligent, etc. until humans came to exist!!! Well, many extinct species were a lot bigger then humans, but we are obviously the smartest of all animal species!!! With nothing but pure accidents, things just get better and better and better ...!!! I think someone has been sniffing something illegal. For example, monkeys can do certain tasks which require some minimal intelligence, but "evolution" cannot even do these things!!! For example, monkeys can be taught to put a piece of toast in a toaster!!! But "evolution" cannot even do that!!! Yet the atheists and evolutionists pretend that accidents/evolution can do many millions of things that neither monkeys nor humans can do!!!
Three Debate Articles I Forgot To Put UpSome time ago I wrote three debate articles as to why the theory of evolution cannot be true. The three articles got pushed over and forgotten about. But there are some really good discussions about the theory of evolution in these three articles. So here they are: Article: Key Issues In The Evolution Debate: Part 1 of 3: Creationism Verus Evolution - Who Wins?
The Human BrainConsider the sophistication of DNA such that it creates a person's brain. Let us think about a pianist. A pianist must be able to convert many thousands on dots on a sheet of music into the movements of their fingers!! To do this the DNA must create the nerves between their eyes and their brain, then the brain must process these dots and then the brain must send signals to the fingers of the pianist. And the DNA must create the muscles on their fingers, etc. If all of this is in place, and much more, and with thousands of hours of practice, spread over many years, a pianist can play the Rachmaninoff Piano Concerto #3!! And to play this piano concerto without sheet music (as would be done in a concert) also requires a massive memory!!!
Here is a YouTube video of Anna Fedorova playing the Rachmaninoff Piano Concerto #3 (watch for at least 3 and a half minutes so you see her fingers when she really gets going)!!! Better yet you can just listen to it and continue reading. You will know when her fingers are really flying around: Try to teach a bonobo to play this piano concerto!!! It would never happen!!! Humans are special because we are the children of God. Many years ago I had a friend named William Marsden (i.e. Bill Marsden or Billy Marsden - I don't know what he goes by now) who, if you put sheet music in front of him that he had never seen before, he could play this music immediately. He is the nicest guy in the world!!! If you put such a piece of sheet music in front of me, I wouldn't have the slightest clue how to play that piece of music!!! And most people would not do any better than I would. Many people have incredible talents that the average person does not have. How could evolution have created these special "gifts" (i.e. "talents") that only a very, very small number of humans have?? Here is my point: what created our DNA, which in turn created our brain (DNA would have to control cell divisions if there was no God and no spirits), had to be far, far smarter than our DNA and our brain!!! That would be God. Much of what we can do comes from our spirit and God merged our spirits with our bodies. Somewhere in this process "talents" were created, which came from both our DNA (which came from our parents) and our spirits. Maybe we learned many things while we were still spirits (before we were born with a physical body). Accidents (i.e. evolution) have zero intelligence so how could accidents create something with intelligence? They can't!! Intelligence is a top-down process and someone a lot smarter than humans had to design human DNA and the DNA for every one of the several million species of animals on this planet which have or do exist, all of which would need a male and female. Which is more intelligent: accidents or monkeys?? Think about that. Obviously monkeys. The limit of monkey intelligence is far higher than the limit of accidents!!! But monkeys cannot design and create the DNA for an extinct species or write or play a piano concerto!!! Could accidents or monkeys design and build a Buick automobile? Of course not. It takes a lot of intelligence, including many different specialties, to build a Buick automobile. Only humans can build an automobile. Likewise, only God could have sequenced the DNA and created the cells for several million species of plants, animals and insects.
The Spirit WorldAll living things, by definition, have spirits. Life comes from spirits. Spirits cannot die - EVER!!! And I assume this applies to animals as well. A spirit is a spirit!! Spirits can travel at the speed of light!! So if a person in the spirit world, who lives in Sweden for example, wants to see someone in the physical world or spirit world in Missouri, it only takes them the blink of an eye to get there!!! If you want to, when you are in the spirit world, I suspect you can track down some Woolley Mammoths!!! I don't know why not!! If you want to meet Hitler (I don't know why anyone would want to do that), you can visit him!! The spirit world is on this planet although spirits can pretty much go anywhere they want to go (e.g. to the moon or Mars). When a person (or animal for that matter) dies they remain on this planet (as a spirit) and at that time they can see other spirits of departed people or even departed animals!!! We cannot see spirits until we die, unless Heavenly Father approves it. But they can see us no matter what. It is very, very, very, very rare when Heavenly Father lets a mortal see a spirit!!!!! It has only happened to me once, and that was an emergency to end all emergencies!!! You cannot believe how different my life would have been without getting key information from that spirit who was allowed to appear to me and give me key information!!! My wife died in 2016 (after 44 years of marriage and seven children) and she is now in the spirit world in Norway (where she was born). There are a heck of a lot more spirits on this planet (for animals and humans) than there are people and animals that we can see!!! Note this carefully: every human being who has ever lived on this planet (starting with Adam and Eve, who were obviously resurrected shortly after Christ's resurrection), who has died and not been resurrected, is in the spirit world!!! We don' know where Adam and Eve are because they have been resurrected. Here is an interesting question: where are the people who have already been resurrected??? Well, all of them were very rightous, so where are they?? They have physical bodies so we should be able to see them. I have no clue where they are. Infants and children who die before the age of 8 (which includes hundreds of millions of children) are guaranteed eternal salvation!!! They were too holy and too pure to behold the ways of man. I have a granddaughter in the spirit world. She died before she was 8 so she was and is a very special person!!!! I look forward to meeting her in the spirit world after I die. George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin, etc. are in the spirit world!!!
For those who have loved ones in the spirit world (and we all do), here is an incredibly scholarly article on the spirit world which is on the BYU website which was written by Professor Brent L. Top: The "temptations" he mentioned in his article were mortal temptations. However, I can guarantee you that spirits can also be subject to temptations!! A person could theoretically drop from the Celestial Kingdom (at the time they die) to the Telestial Kingdom (by the time of the Second Coming of Christ, which is also called "Judgment Day") because of what a person does in the spirit world!!! The spirit world is not all it is cracked up to be!!!! The phrase "Endure to the End" should be translated: "Endure To The Second Coming," because that is the true Judgment Day where our eternal destinies will be determined!!! Until then we can go up and down in "spirituality," even in the spirit world!!!
Final Comments About The Evolution DebateThere are hundreds of books which are favorable to the theory of evolution and there are hundreds of books which are strongly critical of the theory of evolution!! There are also many YouTube videos on both sides of the debate. Those who are critical of the theory of evolution are called "creation scientists" or "creationists" or "intelligent design" people because they believe that scientific data favors a "Creator" of the Universe. In fact, if you want to get published in a leading biology journal you better be an atheist and your article better support the theory of evolution. If it does not praise Darwin and evolution your article will end up in the trash can, not in a "science" journal!!! They will not even read your paper!! They love popularity and they are deathly afraid that someone will claim that they believe in God (their status would drop through the floor)!!! You cannot believe how literal that last paragraph was!!!! Let me repeat that because it explains why the theory of evolution still exists: they are deathly afraid that someone will claim that they believe in God (their status would drop through the floor)!!! This is especially true in states like California, Oregon and Washington, the heathen states. When President Trump was campaigning for president he did not even bother to compaign in those three states because he knew that they were so out of touch with reality that he could not win any of those states!!! It is all about pride!!! Without pride there would be no theory of evolution!!! If a college student writes an article and the teacher/professor sees the word "God" or the word "Adam" (in a favorable way) within a fraction of a second the paper will be in the trash can!!! Pride is a massive, massive problem in most universities!!! From the incomprehensible sophistication of DNA, to the amazing number and complexity of cell types (some of which are transparent), to the earth we live on, to the ends of the Milky Way Galaxy, to the furthest galaxy cluster and supercluster (our Laniakea Supercluster has about 100,000 galaxies), and considering the "constants" in physics (e.g. the gravitational constant); the credibility of the theory of evolution has dropped to ABSOLUTE ZERO!!! There are more than a TRILLON GALAXIES!!! This number will go up and up and up and up as bigger and bigger telescopes are put into space. This number will never stop growing permanently, it will always grow as telescopes (especially in space) get bigger and better!!! By the way, astronomers know of many exoplanets which, by definition, are stars with at least one orbiting planet. Many of these planets, like ours, have life on them. Perhaps some of them are being prepared by God to have a new set of human spirits be placed into human bodies to be tested and trained. Yes, many of these exoplanets already have or will eventually have an "Adam and Eve" on them and likely a Grand Council even before Adam and Eve are put on that planet!!! Our planet earth and our Sun are an exoplanet. If you picked a specific galaxy, any galaxy, I wonder how many of the stars in this galaxy would have one or more orbiting planets which have intelligent life on them??? Probably most of them!!! God doesn't create galaxies to look at!!! Such a fact as exoplanets would not have surprised the leaders of the Latter-Day Saint church even in the very early days of the church. In the early days of the church there was a "star" that was said to be the star that was closest to the throne of God. It's name was said to be Kolob!!! No one knows in which galaxy Kolob is in!!! It might be in our galaxy, I don't know.
See this article about where God came from and the poem about where God came from (LDS version of course): Did you notice that amazing poem about God by William W. Phelps (1792-1872) (search for the phrase: "hie to Kolob" in the first line of the poem)!!!
Other Anti-Evolution BooksIf you listen to the propaganda of the pro-evolution monopoly you might think that anyone who believes in creation science (i.e. God) is a dolt. Nothing could be further from the truth. There are many "creation scientists" (i.e. those who believe God created this Universe) who are brilliant and have no problems seeing through the false science generated by the scientific establishment. Many of the anti-evolution books were written by PhDs in the sciences. I was a cancer researcher who worked with about 13,000 cancer patients. The arguments in these anti-evolution books totally shred the theory of evolution from a scientific standpoint. Some of these books may be out of print so you may have to use a book finder, such as Alibris, to find them.
Here is a link to this appendix (some of these 30 or so books may push a specific religious denomination): By the way the "young earth" concept is caused by damage done to the book of Genesis in the Bible over centuries of time. This damage caused people to claim that the entire Universe was created in a few days time. If this were true, we would not be able to any other galaxy yet or even most of the stars in our own galaxy.
In the Mormon/Latter-Day Saint church, the Pearl Of Great Price (expecially the Book of Moses) was largely written to fix the damage to the book of Genesis (I mentioned this above). The Pearl Of Great Price was first published in 1851 (not a typo), before Darwin's first evolution book:
If you know of any book or CD that needs to be added to my list, please let me know. Here is a Google search that will yield over 3,000 hits: If you have read this far: pat yourself on the back!!!!! Good job, now go and tell many others!!!!!
And don't forget the article which lists many articles on this website, most of which are not mentioned on this home page: The above article is linked to in the next article I will talk about.
When you are ready to read one or more of the four free eBooks on this website, here is an article which links to the four free eBooks on this website (and it links to an article which mentions more than 400 reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true) and it links to other articles (such as for Latter-Day Saints). Two of the four eBooks have links to the individual chapters of the book: And don't forget to tell your friends about this website, whether in person or by email or by social media. Thanks in advance!!!
About The Author And Other Things (Some Funny)This website is the product of R. Webster Kehr, who lives in Lees Summit, Missouri. The statements made in this website are the product of R. Webster Kehr. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, while openly anti-evolution since 1830 (when the Book of Mormon was first published), which was before Darwin's first book was published, cannot endorse or link to any document or website which it's officers have not approved or produced. More importantly the church will not endorse any website which it does not have total control over (including all passwords)!!! So R. Webster Kehr is alone responsible for the content of all of the books and articles on this website.
If you want to learn more about the Mormon church (which is a Christian church - The Church Of Jesus Christ Of Latter Day Saints or simply: LDS) please see this website which is owned by the LDS church:
This is off the subject (this YouTube video will make you laugh) but this YouTube video is fantastic in that several leading people were interviewed, before the presidential election, about Donald Trump's chances of winning the presidential election. These people were interviewed BEFORE THE ELECTION RESULTS (11 minutes) and they gave Trump NO CHANCE TO WIN:
Here are some links to YouTube for various music that old people (like me) enjoy - there are some incredibly beautiful music and images!!!!!: Here is my cell phone number: 816-328-9519 (Lees Summit, Missouri). I live with one of my daughters, and her family, so you will not find me in the Lees Summit telephone book. Here is my email address, which is camouflaged to avoid web crawlers.
GOD BLESS AND PLEASE SPREAD THE WORD ABOUT THIS WEBSITE ON SOCIAL MEDIA, ETC.!!!
|
