Welcome To The "Prophets Or Evolution" Website!!

This website contains two free eBooks and many free articles plus a massive spreadsheet. The top section is VERY IMPORTANT so make sure you read all of it!!

At the bottom of this page is an "Additional Section" of articles on specific topics. These articles help keep the home page at a reasonable length. This section has a yellow background.

My email address is at the very bottom of this page.

Introduction

Let's talk about scientists. Don't all scientists believe in the theory of evolution? Some do and some don't. Hundreds of scientists have written pro-evolution books and hundreds of scientists have written anti-evolution books.

As most people know, there is a large debate between the atheists and evolutionists versus the "creation scientists" who believe in God.

Before going very far in this debate, we need to define what "evolution" is and what "evolution" is not. The atheists and evolutionists talk as if the theory of evolution has created all plants, and has created all animals, and the planets, and they claim the theory of evolution created all stars, and the galaxies, galaxy clusters, etc. meaning they claim evolution created the entire Universe (e.g. via the Big Bang).

But all of these claims are nonsense because "evolution" is not a force in nature like gravity or rain, "evolution" is only a concept that there is no God. For example, if there were no God the only way that DNA could have been created, if evolution was true, would be a long series of accidents

That's it!! The "theory of evolution" is not a force in nature, it is only a theory of the atheists and evolutionists that there is no God. The theory of evolution should really be called the "theory of accidents!!! Accidents are a force, but evolution is not a force, it is only an abstract concept!!

For example, you can't imagine how many times the atheists and evolutionists have said something like this: "evolution created a new and improved species from an old species."

There are several problems with such an absurd statement.

First, DNA cannot be changed - period. So the DNA of one animal cannot be changed into the DNA of another animal. Not only can DNA not be physically changed, even if it could it would be ludicrous to claim that one massively complex computer program (the DNA of an animal) could be RANDOMLY CHANGED into a superior computer program (e.g. superior DNA which can create a new and proved species).

If evolution were true, and accidents could create massively sophisticated computer programs (like DNA), we could fire all computer programmers and use random number generators to simulate evolution in order to write new computer programs and to enhace old computer programs into new and improved computer programs which have new features (e.g. the atheists and evolutionists claim that the DNA of an existing species can be randomly modified into the DNA of a superior species)!!

Literally, the atheists and evolutionists give "evolution" more intelligence than any team of human beings because all of the scientists on this planet could not design and create new DNA for a new species or design new DNA (to create a new species) by modifying the DNA of an existing species!!!!

The truth is that evolution cannot do anything because it is nothing but accidents and is a concept to get converts to atheism!!! The major purpose of the theory of evolution is to convince people that there is no God and that everything in the Universe, that was not man-made, was made by a series of accidents. But there is zero science behind the theory of evolution being able to do anything.

I will bet you have never heard a scientist say that accidents have created everything in the Universe, including the DNA for all species of plants, animals and insects on this planet. That is because no one would believe them if they said it that way!!!

So what the atheist and evolutionists say is this: evolution has created everything in the Universe, including the DNA for all species of plants, animals and insects on this planet. The atheists and evolutionists say that "evolution/accidents" has created all things.

But evolution has never created anything because it is not a law or force of physics or biology!! The theory of evolution does not create anything, it is only an abstract concept that there is no God and thus everything was created by accidents.

This is critical to understand, if a person lists all of the forces of nature, the theory of evolution should not be on the list!!

But yet the atheists and evolutionists claim that "accidents" (i.e. evolution) have the power and intelligence of God!!

"Evolution" and "accidents" and "atheism" all mean exactly the same thing, it is the claim that there is no God!! We exist because of God or accidents!! It is that simple.

Have you ever heard an atheist or evolutionist talk about accidents? No, because they know that accidents have no intelligence and no direction and no goals!!! But yet the term "evolution" means exactly the same thing as accidents which have no intelligence and no direction and no goals!!!

For example, the atheists and evolutionists needed to claim that the entire Universe (e.g. galaxy clusters) came to exist by accident. This means they had to come up with an "accident" which could create an entire Universe. Well, they came up with the "Big Bang." But they cannot describe a credible object which could have been created by accident and then explode by accident and create our Universe!!

So they tried a lot of ideas and ended up by saying that nothing exploded and this explosion created the more than 100 billion galaxies which are currently defined to be our "Universe." As newer and bigger telescopes are put in space, even more galaxies will be discovered.

It is hard to image how nothing could explode and create a Universe. You have to give the atheists credit for being excellent story tellers, but they need better logic. But if you are a good atheists you have to accept it.

In summary, either the Universe, and everything in the Universe, was created by God or by accidents!! Those are the only two choices!!! "Evolution" is not one of the options because "evolution" is simply an abstract concept that there is no God. Evolution doesn't do anything, it is simply a word on a piece of paper.

When you hear the atheists and evolutionists talk, they carefully describe the things God has done and then claim these things were created by accidents!! Remember, "evolution" is only a concept that there is no God. It is the concept that accidents created the Universe and everything in it that is not man-made!!

Do all scientists believe in the theory of evolution? Some do and some don't. Hundreds of scientists have written pro-evolution books and hundreds of scientists have written anti-evolution books, which are generally called "creation science" books.


Natural Selection

One of the pillars of the theory of evolution, according to the atheists, is "natural selection."

Scientists claim that natural selection is a key part of evolution. However, natural selection is an ELIMINATION PROCESS. Natural selection eliminates species which already exist (i.e. the strong species eliminate the weak species).

While "natural selection" is a true principle, let me mention that natural selection has nothing to do with creating anything!! Natural selection is purely an elimination process, whereby weak species, which already exist and have DNA, are killed-off by strong species, which also must exist and have DNA!!

So natural selection could not have been a force in nature until long after DNA existed!!

What idiot would claim that natural selection could CREATE the DNA for a species!! Well, many atheists and evolutionists make that claim.

The validity of natural selection has absolutely nothing to do with "evolution!!!"

In fact, natural selection and evolution work against each other!! Natural selection is trying to destroy existing species so the strong survive and evolution is trying to create new species!!! Natural selection would easily win that battle because it works millions of times faster than creating new DNA by totally random processes (if accidents could create a new species, which they can't)!!!

While no one argues the validity of natural selection, as an elimination process, what people do argue about is the creation of new species, which is known as "evolution" by the atheists and evolutionists. Let me emphasize: the "evolution debate" is not about the elimination of species via NATURAL SELECTION, it is about the creation of new species!!

Yet, many atheists and evolutionists claim that natural selection is a KEY PART of creating a new species!! This is nonsense, natural selection requires two fully functional species, at least one of which wants to kill or eat the other.

The point is that "evolution," according to the atheists, must create at least two species BEFORE natural selection can kill-off the weaker species (assuming the species find each other).

The problem with natural selection, is that because of the discovery of DNA, it is impossible for any species to exist!!

Thus, natural selection is totally irrelevant to the evolution debate both because there should not be any species to eliminate (because accidents cannot create DNA or sequence the DNA), but even if species could be created by a series of accidents, the only thing that natural selection can do is destroy the weaker species!!

Yet the atheists claim that evolution works BECAUSE OF NATURAL SELECTION!!! How dumb can the scientific establishment be? I frequently wonder about that. But I suspect that their apparent stupidity is self-imposed due to their hatred of God.

This article will go into great detail about why Natural Selection has absolutely nothing to do with evolution:
Article: Can Natural Selection Save The Theory of Evolution?


What To Do?

So what should a student do? It is definitely not advisable for a student to argue with their teacher, but there is nothing wrong with a student quietly going "offline" and learning the truth about the absurdity of the theory of evolution because of the sophistication of DNA and the sophistication of the cells that the DNA resides inside of, among many other reasons (e.g. the physical constants and the Universe).

This website shows no mercy for the theory of evolution. Why should it? The theory of evolution is pure science fiction!! In fact, this website discusses hundreds of reasons that the theory of evolution cannot be true, meaning hundreds of reasons that accidents could not have created everything in the Universe, including what is on this earth that is not man-made!!

I can assure you that God is not pleased with people who teach that He does not exist!!! God loves His children (that includes you and me). But as our Father, God wants His children to know the truth. And just as importantly, God is a very forgiving God.

On this website there are two free eBooks (see the section below with a pink background). Plus there are many free articles which annihilate the theory of evolution!!

But start by reading this home page because it contains a lot of key, basic information!!!

Don't forget to tell all of your friends about this amazing website (which doesn't sell anything) on social media (e.g. Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, Pinterest, etc)!!!!! There is no other website on the Internet like this one!!!!!

At the bottom of this page is an "Additional Section" for articles on specific topics to help keep the home page at a reasonable length. But these are very important articles!! This section has a yellow background.

My email address is at the very bottom of this page.

The Debate Between The Prophets And The Evolutionists!!

There is a critical debate between those who believe that God lives and that God created all things (as taught by the prophets in the Bible, Book of Mormon and other scriptures); versus those who do not believe in God (i.e. the atheists and evolutionists) who believe that the Universe, and everything in the Universe, came to exist purely by a series of accidents which are called the Big Bang followed by the theory of evolution.

Is this possible? NO, accidents do not create massively complex systems in any field of science!!!

In fact, it would take more than a quadrillion highly sophisticated blind accidents, meaning random mutations to DNA, with no evidence of any failures, to have created all of the DNA for all of the species on this planet!!!

Of course, the atheists and evolutionists ask: "if there is a God, then where did God come from?" There is a link to an article on that subject later on this page.

So who wins the evolution debate? It is not so much who wins the debate as who loses the debate!!

Evolution loses because it is nothing but accidents and accidents could never have created this Universe and everything in it such as human DNA and the cells that DNA resides inside of!!

The "accidents" claimed by the atheists and evolutionists, to create DNA, are so sophisticated that no human being on earth understands all of the nucleotides on any DNA strand, not even the DNA of an ant, much less the massively more complex human DNA!!

No computer program on this planet, either at the source code level or the object code level, was written by random-number generators. The "accidents" of evolution and the "random number generators" used in computer programs are essentially the same thing.

What computer programmer in their right mind would use random number generators to "write" computer programs either at the source code level or the object code level!!!

Only humans can write computer programs. And only humans can write "compilers" that convert human-designed source code into object code that computers can understand.

But the DNA of an ant is more sophisticated than any human-designed computer program and humans CANNOT write DNA code!! So why do the atheists claim that the one million most sophisticated computer programs on this planet (i.e. the DNA of animals, plants, insects, etc.) were written exclusively by accidents??!!

Because they want converts to atheism.

It gets worse for the atheists. Every DNA strand resides inside of a cell. Are cells simple? Could cells have formed by a series of accidents? Consider this quote from another website:

  • "We now know that there are in fact tens of thousands of irreducibly complex systems on the cellular level. Specified complexity pervades the microscopic biological world. Molecular biologist Michael Denton wrote, "Although the tiniest bacterial cells are incredibly small, weighing less than 10-12 grams, each is in effect a veritable micro-miniaturized factory containing thousands of exquisitely designed pieces of intricate molecular machinery, made up altogether of one hundred thousand million atoms, far more complicated than any machinery built by man and absolutely without parallel in the non-living world."
    http://www.darwins-theory-of-evolution.com/

An "irreducibly complex system," is by definition, a sequence of complex chemical reactions, such that if any one of the chemical reactions was not there, or failed, the end result of the chemical reaction will fail and the entire cell may be at risk!!!

Michael Denton did not say there was one such sequence of chemical chain reactions in cells, but "tens of thousands" of such systems!!!

This is significant because it is one of the many reasons that "evolution" cannot create a cell from scratch!! In other words, all of the chemical chain reactions must be functional at the time the cell is first created because if one or more systems of chemical chain reactions is not there from the beginning, the new cell may not survive!!! Accidents could never do this!!

In other words, an irreducibly complex chemical reactions cannot "evolve" into existence by adding one chemical reaction at a time because each and every chemical chain reaction must be fully functional before the chemical reaction can achieve any benefit to the cell!!"


Let Us Focus On Human DNA

When thinking about human DNA, the number of permutations of human DNA (i.e. unique ways to order the nucleotides that make up human DNA) is astronomical!! There are about 43,200,000,000 different ways to sequence human DNA, and the probability that any of these permutations could create a viable human baby is almost zero.

By comparison, the estimated number of atoms in our UNIVERSE is a paltry 1090.

The truth is that if evolution were true, the nucleotides on human DNA would be RANDOMLY SEQUENCED (i.e. randomly ordered) and the vast, vast, vast, vast MAJORITY OF PERMUTATIONS OF HUMAN DNA (given the length of human DNA) WOULD NOT LEAD TO THE INSTRUCTIONS NECESSARY TO CREATE A HUMAN BABY!!

In fact, if the sequence of DNA nucleotides were created by nothing but accidents, the space in a billion billion Universes, like our own Universe, could not hold all of the failures of evolution (to create just human DNA) if the theory of evolution were true!!

When thinking about the DNA for all of the species on this planet, the absurdity of evolution is much worse than when just thinking about human DNA.

Yet the overwhelming absurdity of the theory of evolution, precipitated by the discovery of DNA, did not change the minds about God for very many atheists (yes, some did switch over).

So why does the theory of evolution even exist after the discovery of DNA?? Because the atheists are still selling books and looking for converts.

Let's talk about male DNA and female DNA. The alignment of male DNA and female DNA, for each species with a male and female, MUST BE PERFECT THE FIRST TIME!!! Alignment is not something that can "evolve" because if the alignment isn't perfect THE FIRST TIME the species will immediately go extinct because there can be no offspring to perpetuate the species unless the male/female DNA alignment is perfect!!

Similarly, you cannot take a computer program THAT DOES NOT WORK and RANDOMLY change either the source code or object code and get it to work!!! That is precisesly why the DNA for ALL SPECIES, with a male and female, had to be perfect the first time because DNA is like a computer program and it either works or it doesn't work!!!

Let's think about a few of the things that were REQUIRED for the first two humans to exist and have offspring:
1) DNA for plants or animals so the humans have something to eat (this actually had to happen first),
2) DNA in the male sperm cells of the male (required for male babies),
3) DNA in the female sperm cells of the male (required for female babies),
4) DNA in the female egg (i.e. ovum),
5) The DNA in the male sperm cells must align properly with the DNA in the female egg so they can have male children (this is far more complex than you think),
6) The DNA in the female sperm cells must align properly with the DNA in the female egg so they can have female children,
7) All of this must happen in the same latitude and longitude and timeframe so the male and female can find each other.

There must also be hormones so the male and female are attracted to each other.

Plus our planet must have already had the right combination of chemicals in the air. Plus many other things were needed for the first human baby to be born on this planet.

God had to create these things. I will talk about where God came from below.


More Details About DNA

Getting back to DNA, it has already been said that the number of ways that the nucleotides on human DNA can be ordered is a 4, raised to the power of 3.2 billion, which is 43,200,000,000. The vast, vast, vast majority of these permutations would not create a viable human baby!! And that number is only for humans. There are more than a million species, many of which have both a male and female which have DNA which must align in a very precise way.

My point is that even if "accidents" could create a DNA strand, the probability that this first DNA strand would have nucleotides in an ordering that could create a human being is insanely small.

Furthermore, the first male and first female of a new species must exist in the same latitude and longitude, and the same timeframe (so they can find each other and mate)!!! This would be an insane claim for box turtles or humans.

Here is a paradox, where did the first egg to create the FIRST female box turtle come from??? By context, the egg for the first female box turtle could not have come from a female box turtle because we are talking about where the egg for the first female box turtle came from!!!

The atheists would say that the egg for the first female box turtle came from another species with different DNA than a box turtle. So how did a female animal, not a box turtle, lay an egg with DNA for a female box turtle??

In addition, the DNA in a male sperm cell and the DNA in a female sperm cell had to be "accidentally" created (in the first male box turtle) in the same timeframe, same latitude and same longitude as the DNA in at least two eggs inside of a female box turtle.

The claims of the atheists are so absurd they amount to nothing but fancy story telling.

When you combine the structure of DNA with the sequence of nucleotides on the DNA, DNA is by far the most sophisticated computer program on this planet by a wide margin!!

As if that weren't bad enough, there are more than one million species on this planet, thus there are more than one million complex DNA strands and every one of them is far more sophisticated than any computer program ever written by humans!! And human DNA is the most sophisticated of all DNA strands, though it is not the longest DNA strand. The longest DNA strand title goes to a fish: protopterus aethiopicus with 133 billion base pairs (human DNA is 3.2 billion base pairs).

Before the discovery of DNA, no one knew why a dog was a dog and a cat was a cat and a horse was a horse, etc. Now we know, a dog is a dog because the DNA in the fertilized egg of a female dog has the instructions to make a dog via millions or billions of cell divisions!!

For each species which has a male and female, like humans, their DNA (of the male and female) must align in a very precise way in order for them to have offspring.

How could the world's most sophisticated computer program, the DNA in the fertilized egg of a human mother (which, after conception, contains a mixture of information from the DNA of both the mother and father), have formed by a series of complete accidents!!

All of the scientists in the world could not design, sequence and build the DNA of any insect, plant or animal on this planet. Yet the atheists say that all DNA was built and sequenced by random mistakes (i.e. by evolution)!!

And where are the countless dead animals whose DNA, which was created by random mutations of DNA, was not good enough for the survival of the animal? Literally trillions of Universes would be filled with these dead mutants if the theory of evolution were true!!

In short, the evolution debate is NOT "God versus evolution," rather the evolution debate is God versus accidents!! Remember, evolution is NOT a force in nature, rather it is a concept!! Accidents are the "force" that the atheists/evolutionists claim created the Universe and everything in the Universe (everything which was not created by man).

(Note: I should note that many religions teach that all animals, including humans, have a "spirit." It is quite possible that this spirit aids the DNA in the creation of a baby from a single fertilized egg. Atheists, however, would reject that spirits exist. I will talk more about spirits later.)


Digging Deeper Into DNA

If the atheists and evolutionists were to claim that scientists could create viable DNA; to make sure they don't cheat I would ask them to design and create the DNA for the extinct Woolly Mammoth (male and female) and Dodo Bird (male and female) and bring them back into existence, able to reproduce!!

All the scientists in the world could not do that. So how long would it take accidents to create and sequence the DNA for a living Woolly Mammoth and Dodo Bird?? How would the atheists like to sit in jail until that happens!!!

After studying DNA since 1953, scientists only understand about 2% of human DNA. This 2% obviously represents the simple parts of DNA. See this image of the axis of Beta-DNA or B-DNA:
Image of DNA Double Helix (Right Image - Click Image to Magnify!!)

If you STUDY the right-hand image, you will know WHY, if a DNA strand is cut in half, like a rope, all of the scientists on this planet could not put the DNA strand back together. Nor could accidents (i.e. evolution) put the DNA back together!!!!!

That is such an important statement I am going to repeat it:

If you STUDY the right-hand image, you will know WHY, if a DNA strand is cut in half, like a rope, all of the scientists on this planet could not put the DNA strand back together. Nor could accidents (i.e. evolution) put the DNA back together!!!!!

This is precisely why a new species, with new DNA, cannot be created from the DNA of an old species!!! In other words, you cannot take an existing species and create a new and improved species, with new DNA, by modifying the DNA of the original species!!!

To put this another way, once DNA is constructed it cannot be changed, it can only be damaged!! What this means is that you cannot take an existing DNA strand and randomly modify its structure (to create a new species) because to do this you would have to cut the DNA strand!!

But if you (or some other event) cut or break a DNA strand it is impossible to connect the segments back together because of the way that DNA is constructed!!

Yet the ENTIRE FOUNDATION of the theory of evolution is that the DNA of one species can be modified into the DNA of a new and improved species!! This is impossible to happen once, much less more than a million times!! It would literally be like taking the object code of a massively sophisticated computer program and randomly changing the "bits" on the object code and expecting to end up with a new and improved computer program WITH NEW FEATURES!!!

But the DNA of an ant is massively more sophisticated than any human-designed computer program!!

The truth is that neither all of the scientists in the world, nor accidents (i.e. evolution) can create a new species, with new DNA, by modifying the DNA of an old species!!!!! That is one reason why I keep saying that the discovery of DNA, in 1953, signaled the end of the theory of evolution as being a credible scientific theory. Yet this very claim is the foundation of the theory of evolution after the discovery of DNA!! The atheists claim that accidents (i.e. evolution) can create a new DNA strand (i.e. a new species) from on old DNA strand (i.e. an old species). The foundation of the theory of evolution is false precisely because DNA cannot be changed, it can only be damaged.

The B-DNA (Beta form of DNA) is the most common form of DNA. Now see this VERY SIMPLIFIED webpage about the structure of DNA:
Website: Basic Information About DNA

Remember, the theory of evolution was developed by Darwin about 100 years before DNA was discovered. Darwin did not have the slightest clue that DNA existed and he barely knew what a cell was and he had no clue that every animal is created by a single fertilized egg which has DNA which controls millions or billions of cell divisions which are so sophisticated that no scientist has the slightest clue how DNA controls these cell divisions!!!


Kehr's Paradox #1 and Kehr's Paradox #2

As just mentioned, the atheists and evolutionists claim that the DNA of an existing species can be modified into the DNA of a new and improved species. In fact, this is the very core of the theory of evolution after the discovery of DNA. Let us ignore the fact that DNA cannot be changed and ponder their claim by assuming that the changes to DNA are made one nucleotide at a time.

Kehr's Paradox #1: If an existing DNA strand is modified enough times, in random locations and with random nucleotides chosen each time, eventually 25% of the nucleotides will be an 'A' and 25% of the nucleotides will be a 'C' and 25% of the nucleotides will be a 'G' and 25% of the nucleotides will be a 'T' and no animal will be created.

The claim that no animal will be created can be observed by looking at this bar chart (study all of the bar charts - the last bar chart shows the end result of this paradox):
Book: Patterns of Intelligence - Chapter 18 - (Study All Bar Charts Including the Last One!!)

Kehr's Paradox #2: If an existing DNA strand is modified enough times, in random locations and with random nucleotides chosen each time, eventually 25% of the nucleotides will be correct nucleotides (to create a specific target DNA strand, such as for a male mouse) and 75% of all nucleotides will be the wrong nucleotide and no animal will be created.

Computer simulations would be the best way to check-out these two paradoxes.

The purpose of these two paradoxes is that atheists seem to imagine that IF THERE ARE ENOUGH mutations to a DNA strand eventually you will end up with a new and improved species. The truth is that no matter how many mutations you have there is a limit to how many correct nucleotides evolution/accidents can create!! The limit is 25% correct nucleotides if you are trying to create a specific species.

But viable DNA strands are so very rare (as a percent of all possible permutations) the above concepts disprove the claim that new DNA can be created by a series of random mutations to existing DNA. But as already mentioned, scientists cannot create or change a DNA strand. Nor can accidents.

As usual the atheists and evolutionists live in an unscientific fantasyland.


The "Path" To Human DNA (The Death of the Theory of Evolution)

Let us suppose that from the "first living cell" to human DNA there were 1,000 consecutive intermediate species. Remember, we are only looking at the path of species sequentially between the first living cell and human DNA according to the atheists and evolutionists. All other species are ignored in this section.

The number 1,000 is credible because the length of human DNA is massively longer than the DNA of any theoretical "first living cell."

We will call this sequence of species the "path" concept, meaning the path of microbes and animals between the first living cell and human DNA. In other words, if we saw pictures of every species, sequentially, between the "first living cell" and human DNA, this would be the "path."

As just discussed, DNA cannot be modified, it can only be damaged, and when it is damaged it is useless. The "path" concept is ridiculous when considering that DNA cannot be changed, it can only be damaged. In other words, the path concept is impossible because DNA cannot be modified. Yet, if evolution were true there must be a "path" of species from the "first living cell" to human DNA!!!

In addition, both of Kehr's Paradoxes would apply every time there is an attempt to create a new species (i.e. with new DNA) from an old species.

But no matter how much scientific evidence there is against the theory of evolution, the atheists and evolutionists will never accept defeat (except for those who have already switched over)!! So when scientists cannot do something, instead of attribute the DNA, cells and body structure to God, they will always attribute the results to accidents!!

Remember that the theory of evolution is only a concept or belief of the atheists that everything in the Universe came to exist by a "series of accidents!! Actually, it is vastly more wishful thinking on the part of the atheists and evolutionists than it is scientific!!!

The theory of evolution may be a great recruiting tool for the atheists, but it is very, very bad science!!

And how did the "first living cell" come to exist from nothing but rocks, sand and water?? Could scientists create a first living cell, with DNA or RNA inside, from nothing but rocks, sand and water?? Of course not. Hundreds of scientists have PhD degrees in Cell Biology. Cells are not simple!!! There are hundreds of technical terms which are used in the study of Cell Biology!!!

Scientists could not create a cell, with DNA inside of it, which could create a living organism, any more than a team of first grade students could create a space shuttle from scratch. I am not just talking about assembling the space shuttle, but designing and building all of the parts, putting the parts together, creating the fuel, launching the space shuttle and bringing it home safely after hundreds of orbits.

But I should also note that a space shuttle is not alive like a cell is. Scientists have never created life from non-life.

Are you surprised that the "theory of evolution" puts scientists at the top of the intelligence chart in the Universe!! THAT IS THE REAL REASON WHY THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION EXISTS!! Only a scientist who is a complete idiot, or has a giant ego, or is horrible at statistics, would claim that the DNA for more than a million species were created and sequenced by nothing but accidents!!


The Theory of Evolution Is a Religion!!!!!

Everyone knows that a belief in God is part of religion. BUT ATHEISM IS ALSO A RELIGION!!!!

The theory of evolution and atheism are identical!!! They are both religions!!!

Many ancient religions taught their followers to worship idols. Well, the modern religion of atheism gets people to worship something just as stupid and as idols - they worship accidents, which are called evolution!!

THE GOAL OF THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION IS TO PULL PEOPLE AWAY FROM A BELIEF IN GOD AND CONVERT PEOPLE TO A BELIEF IN ACCIDENTS AS THEIR RELIGION.

How can someone be so stupid that they say the theory of evolution is not a religion??

The evolution debate is simple: the Universe and all DNA, etc. were either created by God or by accidents. It is God or accidents.

The theory of evolution is a tool and a disguise so that the religion of atheism, disguised as science, can be taught in schools. To say that a belief in God is religion and a belief there is no God is science is totally inane!! All true scientific evidence, such as the discovery of DNA, is a proof that God lives. A belief in God is hundreds of times more scientific than a belief in atheism!!!

In other words, there are hundreds of SCIENTIFIC reasons the theory of evolution is nonsense. Atheism and evolution are not science.

But judges, school boards, etc. seem to think that atheism is science and not a religion. As this website shows hundreds of times, a belief in God is science, and a belief in evolution is scientific nonsense!!!

Atheism is far more of a religion than a belief in God because all scientific evidence supports a belief in God!!!

Just look at some of the top evolutionists: Woody Allen, Stephen Hawking, Richard Dawkins, the late Christopher Hitchens, Sam Harris, Peter Singer, etc. EVERY ONE OF THEM IS AN ATHEIST AND EVERY ONE OF THEM USES THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION TO GET CONVERTS TO ATHEISM!!!!

The theory of evolution is a path to atheism!!

Copy and Paste this into Google: "world's top athiests"

Every one of the top atheists is also an evolutionist!! There is no difference between atheism (which is a religion) and evolution (which is really bad science).

There is an old saying: "If it walks like a duck, waddles like a duck and quacks like a duck, then it is a duck"!!! Today, we would say: "If its DNA contains the instructions to create a duck from a single fertilzed egg, then it's father and mother are ducks and it is a duck!!

Yet in almost all states and school districts atheism is taught as science because a belief in God is not considered as science. How can anyone be that stupid?? How is it possible that anyone be that stupid?? BOTH ARE RELIGIONS, but scientific evidence supports a belief in God. A belief in God is vasty more scientific than a belief in atheism!!!!!

Are judges and the people on school boards stupid?? If someone wants science taught in classrooms, then they need to teach the truth!! Science is supposed to be about truth!! And the truth is that with the discovery of DNA in 1953, the theory of evolution became scientific nonsense!! The scientific evidence is that God lives!!

If school administrators and judges want truth taught in the school classrooms, God will be discussed and the theory of evolution will be ignored.

Not only did God create all things, and not only does God live, but it is this same God who will determine where everyone will spend eternity. God loves His children and does not appreciate people who lead His children astray into the false doctrines and the absurd science of atheism and evolution.

And when thinking about eternity, study the "First Book" article which was mentioned above. Here again is the link to this very, very important article:
Article: The First Book To Describe the Theory of Evolution . . .


Yet Another Tactic Of The Atheists

Here is one of the problems with the atheists and evolutionists - they want converts. Many of the atheists and evolutionists want students to believe in atheism by using a two-step process.

First, they tell students who are Christians to believe in BOTH atheism (i.e. evolution) and theism (i.e. a belief in God). It is like telling students to believe in God and not believe in God.

What is wrong with that? A lot of things. Most importantly a belief in evolution will severely weaken a person's belief in God!!! In fact, that is precisely one of the goals of the atheists and evolutionists!!

First, the atheists try to get people to believe in BOTH atheism (i.e. evolution) and religion. Then they slowly wean them off of religion and they have a new convert to atheism!!

While the atheists are very bad at science, they are very good at deception and in weaning people away from a belief in God!!!

So beware if anyone tells you that it is OK to believe in God and in the theory of evolution. That is not where they want you to end up!!


God Predicted The Coming Forth Of The Theory of Evolution in 1830!!

The Book of Mormon is a religious history book and was published in 1830, which was 29 years BEFORE Darwin's first book was published in 1859.

In Alma chapter 30, satan himself teaches the theory of evolution, including natural selection, to Korihor, who was nick-named the "anti-Christ." Korhihor taught these things and was soon struck dumb by the great prophet Alma the Younger.

The fact that Korihor was struck dumb should give everyone a strong clue as to what God thinks about the theory of evolution!!!

The Book of Mormon makes it very clear that the theory of evolution is satan's perfect doctrine. For example, if you created a spreadsheet with the doctrines of the Mormon church in column 1 (or many of the doctrines of any Christian church) and the opposite of the doctrines of the Mormon church in the second column, the second column would be the doctrines of the theory of evolution.

God will not be mocked!!! And I am being very, very diplomatic. If you don't believe me, STUDY 3 Nephi 29:5-7 in the Book of Mormon. The punishment of "like unto the son of perdition" is not something a person should shoot for.

God will decide who will fit into these versus, but those who write books (for gain) which ridicule the miracles of Christ which are mentioned in the Bible, such as the resurrection of Christ, His raising of the dead, etc. etc. may be at risk for this punishment. And don't forget, the criteria were defined publically in 1830!!

The message of these versus is that God does not like His children being led astray!!! There is no author or politician or judge or educator who damages the testimonies of God, in the youth they are responsible for, who is not at risk for ending up in hell if they continue to teach the theory of evolution or they try to force students to believe in the theory of evolution!! Just like trying to swim out of a dangerous whirlpool is a good idea, so is repentance. Trust me, there is a lot more I could say on this issue.

Is there a God??? Well, the day after Judgment Day everyone will know the answer is 'yes'. But it will too late for many people.

See the article below called: "The First Book To Describe The Theory of Evolution Was Not Written by Darwin" for more information on these issues.


Evolution After The "First Living Cell"

Evolutionists claim that the DNA of the first human male and the DNA of the first human female "evolved" independently over millions of years, from the same "first living cell," by a series of accidents called "evolution"!!!

How did the DNA of the first human father and the DNA of the first human mother "evolve" together from the "first living cell?" How was their DNA synchronized, species after slightly improved species, as the DNA of the males and females evolved independently for millions of years??

Here is the problem, suppose the male DNA evolved slightly faster than the female DNA evolved. Within many thousands of years of new species, their DNA would not align and they would not have been able to have any children that survived because their DNA was not compatible!!

Male DNA and female DNA had to be designed by God, for each species with a male and female!!. Evolution could never have designed two massively sophisticated computer programs (DNA) that could be integrated together to create a third computer program (a baby). And evolution certainly could not have done it in the same time-frame and same locations on the earth.

Yet the atheists claim that evolution created male and female DNA for many species that have both a male and female. They must claim the male and female DNA "evolved" over the same time period (so they could mate as they slowly evolved over many generations) and they had to live in the same geographical area (also required so they could mate).

But the truth is that it does not matter what is discovered in cell biology, DNA analysis, etc. because no matter what is discovered, the atheists will either ignore it or give evolution the credit!!

The evolution debate is not about science, it is about God. If you assume God does not exist, or if you believe God does not exist, you will likely believe in the theory of evolution no matter how absurd it is.

Unfortunately, many people who believed in God have been tricked into believing in evolution. In fact, that is the precise purpose of the highly sophisticated deceptions of the atheists and evolutionists (and I have only talked about a few of their deceptions) and why it is taught in most schools, but not all schools. In some schools, "creation science" or "intelligent design" is taught and in other schools there are disclaimers about evolution.

Biology is no longer about science, it is about creative thinking as to how every discovery can be attributed to the theory of evolution in order to get more converts to atheism. Atheists are not interested in truth, they are only interested in getting converts to atheism.

One of the key deceptions of the atheists and evolutionists, to get converts, is their definition of the term "species." They define the term "species" in such a way that each "variety" of dog is a different "species." To them a Chihuahua and a Great Dane are different "species." This gives them the latitude to claim that they have observed a new "species" form. But if the term "unique species" is defined to be a "unique DNA structure" then they have never seen a new "species" be created. Nor will they ever see a new species be created by accident or by humans.

The atheists and evolutionists don't like to talk about DNA, they like to tell stories and use deception, such as by using very clever deceptive definitions.

Seven chapters in one of the free eBooks on this website are devoted to deceptive definitions.

In addition, the atheists must claim the entire Universe was created by accident!! How could the atheists and evolutionists claim that the entire Universe was created by accident instead of by God? Well, they had to come up with some "accident" that they claimed could create the Universe, including the superclusters of clusters of galaxies. So the atheists invented the concept of a purely accidental "Big Bang." They want you to believe that an accidental explosion (remember, it had to be an accident) created the Universe. I don't think so.

It gets worse. What about the incredible "physical constants." Some of the 300+ physical constants have to be unbelievably accurate or our Universe could not exist!! How did the atheists deal with that impossible subject??

To explain how the physical constants came to exist by accident, one of the most famous atheists came up with the concept of "multiverse," and claimed that there were an infinite number of Universes (i.e. an infinite number of Big Bangs), but all of them failed to create a viable Universe because they did not have the right combination of physical constants. Well, all of them failed except ours, which just happened to have the right combination of physical constants.

You have to admire the atheists and evolutionists for their creative thinking!! But creative story-telling, and hundreds of PhDs, does not imply truth. In fact, it doesn't matter what is discovered, the vivid imaginations of the atheists and evolutionists can generate a story for every scientific fact!!


Comparing DNA to Computer Programs

The evolution debate made a dramatic change when DNA was discovered in 1953!! Scientists now had to explain how DNA came to exist by a series of accidents!!

Today it is obvious that a single fertilized egg contains the instructions to create a baby animal, even humans, via millions or billions of cell divisions!! However, scientists don't have the SLIGHEST CLUE how DNA can create a new baby via millions or billions of cell divisions!!!

We can compare human DNA to a computer program, though human DNA is vastly more sophisticated than any computer program ever written by humans.

If evolution were true, computer programmers would not be needed because random number generators (i.e. evolution or accidents) could create the source code or object code for every new computer program on earth!!

Furthermore, to create a new and improved computer program from an existing computer program; all you would need to do is apply a random number generator to the source code or object code of the old computer program. This process should work every time if evolution is true because there is no evidence of failures of the "accidents" of evolution!!

But random number generators could NEVER create the source code or object code for a new computer program, nor could random number generators modify the souce code or object code of an existing viable computer program and create a new computer program with new features!!

Any computer programmer who was told to write new source code or object code for a new computer program (or to improve an existing computer program) with random number generators, would just laugh at the idea. Yet this same computer programmer may believe in the theory of evolution because he/she does not understand what DNA does.

It is now known that human DNA is like the "object code" of a massively complex computer program. But there is no "source code" and there is no compiler.

To demonstrate this with bar charts, see one of the chapters in one of the free eBooks on this website. This chapter is a series of bar graphs which prove, beyond any doubt, that accidents cannot create a viable DNA strand. And these bar charts do not even discuss the physical construction of DNA!! Click:
Book: Patterns of Intelligence - Chapter 18 - (Study All Bar Charts!!)

The term "evolution" in the time of Charles Darwin and the term "evolution" today mean totally different things because Darwin knew almost nothing about cells and he knew nothing about DNA!!! Darwin only saw the visual form of animals.

Can the atheists and evolutionists explain how accidents created the DNA for more than a million species by a series of pure, undirected accidents?? Absolutely Not!!


Permutations of Nucleotides (Advanced)

A "permutation" is a unique way to order something. For example, two brothers, who are not twins, will have DNA which has many differences. The unique ordering of the nucleotides on the DNA for each brother is called a "permutation."

So the problem for evolutionists is not only creating a DNA strand, but creating a DNA strand with a viable permutation of nucleotides (meaning a viable ordering of nucleotides) which could create a living and functioning baby.

For example, if a new baby had an ordering of nucleotides of:
ACGTACGTACGTACGTACGT...
the baby with this permutation of nucleotides would not survive because there is no intelligence in this ordering.

Thus, not only is it impossible for a DNA strand to be created in nature, even if it could be so created, the probability that a viable permutation of nucleotides (i.e. an ordering that could create a viable plant or animal) could happen by accident is far beyond statistically impossible.

It would be more absurd than trying to create the object code of a massively sophisticated computer program by randomly choosing millions or billions of '0's and '1's.

Study the next paragraph carefully:

Randomly creating a viable permutation of nucleotides, even to create a mouse, by chance, would be far less likely than picking a single correct atom, hidden from among all of the atoms in a trillion trillion trillion Universes!! This is not an exaggeration!! This statement may not be politically correct but it is easily mathematically correct.

There are 4, raised to the power of 3.2 billion, different ways to order the DNA of a human being!! This number is massively, massively larger than the estimated number of atoms in a trillion trillion trillion Universes like ours. And that is just for one human being.

So the issues are not just the creation of the cells and the creation of the DNA inside the cells, but a far bigger issue is obtaining a viable permutation for both a male and female (Adam and Eve) that just happen to align with each other such that they can have children who in turn can have children of their own, etc., all the way to you!!!

In fact, if you added the length of DNA for every unique species on this earth, male and female (e.g. cows would only contribute two DNA strands to this list, one for a male cow and one for a female cow), it would be roughly one QUADRILLION nucleotides.

Now suppose you generated a single DNA strand with one quadrillion nucleotides which were RANDOMLY chosen.

The probability that any sequential subset of nucleotides, from this DNA strand (i.e. from one quadrillion randomly generated nucleotides) would create a single plant or animal, male or female, is essentially zero. It would never happen.

The statistical problems with DNA overwhelm the relatively trivial issues of "time," meaning the age of the Universe. In other words, the age of the Universe is a totally irrelevant issue in the evolution debate.

In summary, to think that the DNA for more than a million species could be created by accident, on the same planet, even in a trillion trillion years, is ludicrous.


The Claim Of Creating A New Species (i.e. New DNA) From An Old Species (i.e. From Old DNA)

The theory of evolution claims that the DNA for a "new species" can be created by randomly modifying the DNA of an "old species." This is at the very core of the theory of evolution!! It is how the complexity of species grew over "millions of years" from simple single-celled "animals" into increasingly complex animals and eventually into human beings.

As a specific example (this simply represents any "evolution" from one species to a more sophisticated species which has new and improved DNA), let us assume that evolutionists claimed that human DNA "evolved" directly from the DNA of bonobos. What their actual claims are is not relevant to this discussion, the issue is whether the DNA of one species (e.g. bonobos) can be MODIFIED to create the DNA for a slightly superior species or a massively superior species.

We will not cover the situation where a species which does not have a male and female can "evolve" into a species which has both a male and female (which is itself a major issue with evolution), rather we will discuss the "evolution" of a species with both a male and female into a superior species which has both a male and female.

In order for evolution (i.e. accidents) to create the DNA for a new species, by randomly modifying the DNA of an existing species, the accidental changes to the (old) male DNA and the (old) female DNA (as required by the theory of evolution) must be in the same sections of their DNA and the changes must happen in the same generation!!

All of the changes to the DNA do not have to occur in the same generation, but each SUBSET of changes must occur in the same generation. For example, there could be 50 changes to the male and female in each of 10 generations (for a total of 500 changes to the male and female). But each subset of 50 changes in each generation must include the same 50 changes.

As an example, the same new genes (male and female) must be in the same sections of their respective DNA so that their offspring (the new species) will have the new section(s) of their DNA from both their mother and father!! This is part of the alignment issues required by evolution.

But not only must the genes and other sections of DNA align between the male and female (as evolution is making changes to the DNA of both the male and female at the same time so the male DNA and female DNA will align with each other at all times), the morphing of the embryo algorithms sections on the DNA of the male and female (Note: this is my terminology for the sections of DNA which control the cell divisions of the baby) must also align because it is the morphing of the embryo algorithms that control the 30 billion cell divisions (in the case of humans) as the new baby is being made!!

By using the term "align" I do not mean that they have the same nucleotides. What I mean is that the FUNCTION of each section must align. For example, the sections of the DNA that contain the gene(s) for eye color, for a male and female, must align, but the eye color of the male and the eye color of the female do not have to be the same.

The alignment of the morphing of the embryo algorithms alone represents an issue so devastating to the theory of evolution that it would destroy the theory of evolution by itself!! For example, with human DNA, and the DNA of many other species, there are two gigantic computer programs (male DNA and female DNA) which are each massively more sophisticated than any human-designed computer program!!! How do these two computer programs align before, during and after the transition from an "old" species to a "new and improved" species??

To make a human baby, these two biological computer programs on two DNA strands must align with each other so their offspring have features of both parents. Try doing that with the object code of two different computer programs!!

There is no way that the morphing of the embryo algorithms, on the father's DNA and the mother's DNA, would align with each other after a massive series of accidents (i.e. as "evolution" is trying to improve the DNA to make a new species)!! In addition, these changes must occur in the same timeframe and same location on this earth or the male and female would not find each other as the massive number of accidents (i.e. evolution) were happening.

This is such a powerful comment that it is essentially a proof that the spirit of the human being (or other animal) was created first (i.e. before birth) and that the spirit of the new baby, combined with the DNA of the new baby, work together to create the new baby!!!!

It is insane to think that for species after species, which have both a male and female, that the DNA of the male and the DNA of the female could align each time there is a new species.

Because of this, the entire concept of "transitional species" is total nonsense!!!! Plus there are many other reasons one species cannot be converted into another species, much less a superior species. It has already been mentioned that once DNA is made, it CANNOT BE CHANGED!!


More On The Male/Female Issue

Humans and many other species have both a male and female whose DNA must align with each other!!

In other words, the DNA in the male sperm cells (some sperm cells are male and some sperm cells are female) must be able to create a male or female baby. But the DNA in his sperm cells and the DNA in her egg must align with each other so they can have male or female babies who have some features of both parents!! How did all of this happen by accident!! It didn't.

For example, the sections (e.g. genes) in each DNA strand of the male and female must be in the same order, and same relative position, on their DNA or their DNA would not align.

Also, once the first sperm cell to reach the ovum (only this sperm cell is allowed inside the ovum) is inside the ovum (the female egg), how is the DNA of this sperm cell pulled out of the sperm cell? It is not as simple as it sounds.

For example, if a person said that chemicals strip off the outside of the sperm cell, the question arises how can these chemicals dissolve the outside of the sperm cell without damaging the DNA in the sperm cell, which is vastly more sensitive to damage than the sperm cell itself?

And how does this DNA, after it is extracted from the sperm cell, line up with the DNA of the ovum? They need to both be pointed in the correct direction and the first nucleotide of each section need to line up (i.e. be in the same position). And all of this must be done AFTER the sperm cell is already inside of the ovum!!!

Plus the first male human and first female human would have had to live on this earth in the same timeframe and same latitude and longitude. Ditto for all other animals which have a male and female. It is hard to imagine how the first male box turtle found the first female box turtle on this planet!!


What Computer Programming Can Teach Us About Evolution

We have already talked about the problems with creating a new species from an old species by mentioning that existing DNA cannot be modified. But there are other reasons a new species cannot be created from an old species even if DNA could be modified.

Let us compare the claim that a new species can be created from an old species to the computer language C#.

When writing or changing a computer program in C# there are three steps:
Step #1) Have a computer programmer, trained in C#, change existing "source code" or write new "source code." Source code is what the computer programmer understands,
Step #2) "Compile" the source code. The "compiler" is a computer program which converts the source code into binary code that the computer understands,
Step #3) The "binary code," created by the compiler, is executed by the computer.

Now suppose that a perfectly good C# computer program needed a major upgrade to add a new feature to the program. There are two options to make the changes:
Option #1) Have the computer programmer make the necessary changes and additions to the source code and then recompile the program, or
Option #2) Randomly mutate (meaning randomly delete, add and change bits) the object code of the original program and hope that the new object code of the program has all of the old features of the old program plus it has all of the desired new features.

No computer programmer on this planet would choose the second option!! It would be a waste of time and would totally destroy the old program and it would not have any new or old features that worked!!!

Yet Option #2 is precisely the way that evolution must work!!! There is no "source code" for DNA, there is only "object code" on the DNA. Evolution can only RANDOMLY change the DNA via random mutations!! Yet the atheists and evolutionists claim that the DNA of a perfectly good species can be randomly mutated (by evolution) and the random mutations will create a new and improved species EVERY TIME!!!

This is nonsense because DNA includes computer programs vastly more sophisticated than any computer program ever written by any team of human beings!!! And the DNA only contains the object code!!

With the discovery of DNA the evolution debate should have left the domain of biologists and been put under the domain of statisticians looking at DNA. But that will never happen because there are many atheists who need the theory of evolution to sell their books and get new converts to atheism!!

In addition to things on this earth, scientists also cannot create a single sun from scratch. And is it logical to think that our sun and all of the stars (e.g. the supergiant star VY Canis Majoris), galaxies, superclusters of galaxies, etc. in the Universe came to exist by an accidental explosion called the Big Bang?

It is absurd to claim that accidents created all DNA, all cells, all stars, all galaxies, etc. But these claims will never go away because the atheists and evolutionists will always be looking for converts. But the truth is that the claims of the atheists are complete scientific nonsense.

The prophets, past and present, are absolutely correct: God is the source of all DNA, cells, galaxies, etc.


The Current Evolution Versus Creation Science Debate

The evolution debate should not be based on the visual forms of plants and animals (i.e. Darwin's phylogenetic tree), but rather it should be based on the probability that the DNA of the plants and animals (and the cells the DNA resides in) came to exist PURELY BY CHANCE (i.e. by the totally random process of evolution)!!

But what massively sophisticated computer program, and human DNA is the most sophisticated computer program on this planet, has ever come to exist by a long series of pure accidents?

To understand this better, suppose you were a spy and you were told by your country to steal the instructions of how to manufacture a certain kind of automobile. Would you take a photograph of the automobile or would you steal the schematics of the machines in the factory that made the automobile?? Obviously you would steal the schematics of the machines.

Likewise, debating the theory of evolution by looking at the visual forms of plants and animals is not scientific because it totally misses the root cause of why the plants and animals exist, which is DNA!!

The fact is that without DNA there would be no plants and no animals.

To be more specific, plants and animals are created by the computer algorithms which are on the DNA of the plants and animals. So looking at the visual form of a plant and animal is NOT looking at what causes the plant or animal to exist!!

Needless to say the atheists and evolutionists don't like to talk about DNA or cells, they like to talk about the visual form of each plant and animal so they can tell their stories. They carefully ignore the fact that computer programs in the human world are never written by random number generators, but evolution itself is essentially a random number generator applied to DNA!! Without God there is nothing but total randomness in nature.

The key question in the evolution debate is this: knowing that the "computer programs" on DNA in nature are vastly more sophisticated than any "human-designed computer program," how could the "computer programs" on DNA, for more than a million species have been "written" by totally random processes?

As will be seen many times on this website, when DNA is looked at during the evolution debate, the theory of evolution becomes scientific nonsense. By definition, there is "no intelligence" in the theory of evolution, especially at the DNA level.

The only "evidence" the evolutionists have for their theory is to ignore DNA and look only at the visual form of plants and animals and then combine the visual form of plants and animals with their exceptional story-telling skills.

Once DNA enters into the evolution debate the theory of evolution quickly collapses because all DNA is a massively sophisticated computer program, even for an ant.


Cell Biology (The Sophistication of Cells)

Suppose you were on a hike deep in the forest and you had not seen any sign of civilization for several hours. Suppose as you came over one hill you saw, what looked like to you, a brand new Buick automobile with its engine running and its headlights on and its hazard lights flashing.

Would you think that this "object" was created by an explosion in a forest?? Of course not. A forest is made of dirt, trees, shrubs, rocks, etc. You would know that what you were looking at was vastly too sophisticated to have been created by an explosion in the forest.

In a similar way, every cell in your body is massively too sophisticated to have been created by "accidents." All species of animals are made from a collection of cells and each of those cells is vastly more sophisticated than any automobile.

In fact, all of the scientists on this planet could not create a single cell for the DNA to reside in. Nor could they create the many other things which are inside the cell that are part of the continuous activities going on inside of almost every cell. Nor could they figure out how to make a cell divide into two cells, including copying the Golgi Apparatus, for example.

Hundreds of scientists have PhD degrees in Cell Biology, so cells are not simple!! The large textbook Essential Cell Biology, Third Edition, has 8 authors and 730 pages plus many pages of other information!! The Glossary has 596 definitions!!! Cells are clearly not simple!!

By the way, the term "species" was not even defined in the book!! The term should be defined thusly: "a unique species is determined by a unique DNA structure." But if the atheists and evolutionists used this definition, the theory of evolution would crumble to the ground. This is precisely what so many atheists tap dance around a definition of "species."

Another textbook on Cell Biology is called: The World Of The Cell, Fourth Edition, by Becker, Kleinsmith and Hardin. This textbook is 845 pages. The term "species" does not show up in the Index.

There are clearly at least 100 reasons the theory of accidents cannot be true due to the sophistication of cells; and this does not include the many issues created purely by the DNA in almost all cells!! In fact, I own two books on this very issue (and I am sure there are other books on this topic):
Signature In The Cell - DNA and the Evidence For Intelligent Design by Stephen C. Meyer
The Cell's Design - How Chemistry Reveals The Creator's Artistry by Fazale Rana

These two men are obviously "creation scientists," meaning they believe that God had to create the many species on this earth because they could not have been created by accidents.

The next section is one of the MAJOR REASONS the theory of evolution cannot be true and it also has to do with DNA!!


What is Life?

Let us look at the issue: "what is life?" For example, if you took a fish and left it out of the water until it died, and then an hour later you put it back into the water, why doesn't it come back to life? All of the raw elements for life are still in the fish, so why doesn't it come back to life? There is something more to "life" than just cells and oxygen and water.

Furthermore, have the evolutionists and atheists ever proven that life can be created from non-life (i.e. inorganic materials)?? Never, never, never - yet they continue to preach atheism.

While several attempts have been made to create life from non-life (e.g. Miller-Uray, Wong and Hartgerink), the scientists have not only failed to create life, they have also failed to prove it can be done. They cannot create a DNA strand from inorganic material, much less a DNA strand with a viable permutation of nucleotides for life which is inside of a cell!!

For example, have scientists put a large shell over a pond, which had no life, meaning there was no DNA and no cells (this simulates "prebiotic," meaning "existing before life"), and observed "life" form by a series of accidents, including RNA or DNA inside of a "first living cell" (in that pond), that was alive and had the ability to divide itself into two cells (which would be required for life to continue)?

Never!!

Then what is their evidence for evolution? Their only evidence is that many scientists do not believe in God and thus they have no choice except to use their God-given brains to deceive people into believing that everything in the Universe, including human DNA, occurred by chance.

But the theory of evolution should have been thrown in the trash can when DNA was discovered and when the complexity of cells was also discovered. Yet, as scientists learn more and more about DNA and cells, the atheists continue to cling to the theory of evolution as if it were still 1859, when Darwin's first book was published.

The only thing that is "evolving" on this planet is the theory of evolution as evolutionists/atheists constantly need to develop new spin to account for the new discoveries about the sophistication of cells, the morphing of the embryo algorithms on DNA, etc.


Can Accidents Or Simplicity Create Complexity?

As one example of complexity, the human eyes are unbelievable in complexity. Yet the sections on human DNA which create the human eyes must be far more complex than the eyes themselves!! And the intelligence who designed the DNA (God) must be far more complex than the DNA itself!!

In other words, simplicity never creates complexity. To understand these concepts, consider these items:

First, consider that a human-designed computer program exists because of the human intelligence to write the computer program, the human intelligence to write the computer language, the human intelligence to write the computer language compiler, the human intelligence to design and build the microprocessor, including designing and building the memory chips, etc.

Second, consider the output of the computer program which is printed on a piece of paper.

How can the printout on the piece of paper be more sophisticated than the human intelligence needed to write the computer program, to write the computer language, etc.?? It can't!!

Let's think about the memory chips. I have a son who works for a company that makes memory chips. At times he is sitting in a very large room by himself, with several billion dollars worth of equipment needed to make memory chips!!

The memory chips cannot be more complex than the machines that made them, and the machines that made them cannot be more complex than the humans who designed them!!

Simplicity cannot create complexity!!

Consider the sophistication of DNA such that it creates a person's brain. Let us think about a pianist.

A pianist must be able to convert thousands on dots on a sheet of music into the movements of their fingers!! To do this the DNA must create the nerves between their eyes and their brain, have the brain process these dots and then the brain controls their fingers. And the DNA must create the muscles on their fingers, etc.

If all of this is in place, and with thousands of hours of practice, a pianist can play the Rachmaninoff Piano Concerto #3!!

What created our DNA, which in turn created our brain, had to be far, far smarter than our DNA and our brain!!!

That would be God.

Accidents (i.e. evolution) have zero intelligence so how could accidents create something with intelligence? They can't!! Intelligence is a top-down process and someone a lot smarter than humans had to design human DNA and the DNA for every one of the million-plus species on this planet, many of which have a male and female.

Could accidents or monkeys design and build a Buick automobile? Of course not. It takes a lot of intelligence, including many different specialties, to build a Buick automobile. Only humans can build an automobile. Likewise, only God could create the DNA for more than a million species of plants and animals.


Who Were the Parents of the First Human Child Born On This Planet?

The Bible says that Adam and Eve were created by God and that they were the parents of the first children born on this planet.

How does the theory of evolution explain who the parents were of the first human children born on this planet? They claim that the first human children born on this planet were children of bonobos or chimpanzee. But this is impossible because DNA can only be damaged, it cannot be changed. This is because of the way that DNA is constructed.

See the "Seventh" reason in this article to understand why DNA cannot be changed:
Article: Fifteen Reasons Evolution Cannot Be True (see: "Seventh")

Here is an article on the topic of who were the first humans born on this planet:
Article: From the First Child to Superclusters

The theory of evolution must explain where TWO humans came from at the same time, and same location on this planet and their DNA could align together in a very specific way!!! The Bible calls these humans Adam and Eve. The Bible correctly identifies the need for a "first" human couple from which the first human babies and all other humans could descend.

Adam and Eve could not have been created as infants or they would have starved to death because they could not gather their food. They had to be created as teenagers or adults.

And their food supply, whether plants or animals, had to be created before they were created!! This requires even more DNA.

The atheists have no credible theory as to how the parents of the first human baby born on this planet came to exist. The "parents" of the first human baby are defined to be "Adam" and "Eve." How did Adam and Eve get on this planet without being born on this planet? God created them.

The atheists, of course, need to develop some "theory" as to how the first real human babies were born on this earth. What they claim is that the parents of the first human babies born on this planet were mutants (i.e. they had mutated DNA). In other words, the parents of the first human babies born on this planet were children of bonobos or some other primate who had mutated DNA for both the male and female (so their DNA could align).

This theory is absurd because you cannot take the male DNA of a bonobo and randomly mutate it into male human DNA. Ditto for the females. In other sections of this website it is explained why DNA cannot be physically changed/improved. DNA can be damaged, but it can never be changed.

Plus we have already talked about changing the object code of computer programs to create a new and improved computer program and how this applies to changing the DNA of one species into a new and improved species via new and improved DNA. And this must also be done for the male and female in the same location and timeframe.

If there were male and female computer programs (i.e. male and female object code), which collectively were joined together to create one computer program object code, then computer programmers would better understand the absurdity of the theory of evolution.

Most of DNA is a massively sophisticated computer program and you simply can't create a new and improved computer program by randomly mutating an existing computer program at the object code level or at any other level. It will never work.

Nor can you join the object code of two massively different computer programs to create a single new computer program which has features of both original computer programs.

The atheists and evolutionists have no credible theory for who the parents, of the first pure human baby born on this planet, were.

By context, the DNA of the parents of the first human baby born on this planet (e.g. a bonobo) would have had DNA that was significantly different than their baby. And their baby's DNA would have been vastly superior to their own DNA!!! This is nonsense.

The Biblical story of Adam and Eve makes perfect sense even in the day of DNA!!

God created (the DNA of) Adam and God created (the DNA of) Eve. And God created the DNA for plants and other animals. The Bible is far more accurate than most biology books.


Where Did God Come From?

The truth is that God had to exist long before our Universe was created and our sun was created and this planet was prepared for earth life. So people naturally want to know where God came from!!

Brigham Young, who was born in 1801 (Darwin was born in 1809), the second prophet of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (the Mormons), said this about the first cause of all things (i.e. where God came from):

  • Many have tried to penetrate to the First Cause of all things; but it would be as easy for an ant to number the grains of sand on the earth. It is not for man, with his limited intelligence, to grasp eternity in his comprehension ... It would be as easy for a gnat to trace the history of man back to his origin as for man to fathom the First Cause of all things, lift the veil of eternity, and reveal the mysteries that have been sought after by philosophers from the beginning.

In other words, there was a "First Cause" of all things - a beginning - but this beginning happened so long ago, and so many quadrillions of things have happened since then, that these events are far, far beyond human comprehension.

By the way, the largest desert on this planet is 5.5 MILLION SQUARE MILES in size (the Antarctica Polar Desert)!! The Arctic Polar Desert is 5.4 MILLION SQUARE MILES in size!!

There are a lot of grains of sand on this planet for the ant to count!!

If Brigham Young had known these two facts, and other facts about deserts, I doubt he would have changed his statement.

  • "I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use."
    Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)

While Brigham Young did not know very much about the Universe in his day, he did understand the principle that the "first cause of all things" is beyond human comprehension.

Brigham Young also said this about God:

  • He is the Supreme Controller of the universe. At his rebuke the sea is dried up, and the rivers become a wilderness. He measures the waters in the hollow of his hand, and meteth out heaven with a span, and comprehendeth the dust of the earth in a measure, and weigheth the mountains in scales, and the hills in a balance; the nations to him are as a drop in a bucket, and he taketh up the isles as a very little thing; the hairs of our heads are numbered by him, and not a sparrow falleth to the ground without our Father; and he knoweth every thought and intent of the hearts of all living, for he is everywhere present by the power of his Spirit -- his minister, the Holy Ghost.

For many quotes about God, see this amazing article:
Where Did God Come From?


Conclusion

So far we have barely touched the surface of the reasons evolution cannot be true, yet even at this point we have no logical choice except to conclude that God exists. Different religions may have different beliefs about God, but there is no choice except to say that God does exist. In the Mormon religion (the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints) there are three separate Gods in the Godhead. The head God (Heavenly Father), the Savior (Jesus Christ) and the Holy Ghost.

Now let's talk about why the theory of evolution even exists.


Evidence From Astronomy

Let's briefly mention another issue - the Universe. Astronomers believe there are between 100 billion and 200 billion GALAXIES in the Universe.

Our sun is just one of the stars in our Galaxy and our sun is a million times larger than our earth.

The star Betelgeuse has a radius 950-1,200 times the size of our Sun. But the star VY Canis Majoris, a red hypergiant star in the Canis Major constellation, is thought to be 1,540 times the size of our Sun.

If VY Canis Majoris replaced our Sun its size would extend beyond the orbit of Saturn and we would be inside the sun.

The galaxy we live in, called the Milky Way Galaxy, has up to 400 billion stars. The Milky Way Galaxy is in the Laniakea Supercluster of galaxies. In other words, there are many galaxies.

As telescopes in space get bigger and bigger more and more stars and more and more galaxies will be discovered.

Can you imagine what a telescope, with the light-gathering power of the width of our earth, would find!!??

Of course the atheists have to invent a story to claim that our Universe was created by an accident. So they claim there was a giant explosion called the Big Bang which created the Universe. Oh good grief, who would believe our Universe was created by an accidental explosion? If there was a "Big Bang" it was a project of God.

The truth is that God had to exist long before our sun was created and this planet was prepared for earth life.


An Overview Of The Key Issues In The Evolution Debate

Since 4000 B.C. the prophets have been saying that God created all things. Modern science, because of the discovery of DNA in 1953, has proven the prophets have been correct all along.

Darwin, to his credit, had no clue that DNA existed or even that cells existed. Thus Darwin could not tell the difference between macroevolution (i.e. a new species has been created by random accidents) and microevolution (i.e. variety within the same species, such as the difference between a Collie dog and a Great Dane dog and a Chihuahua dog - they are all "dogs" and have exactly the same DNA structure).

Darwin observed microevolution but he could not have known that microevolution has nothing to do with the creation of a new species. It was not until 1953, with the discovery of DNA, that the term "unique species" could be correctly defined to be a "unique DNA structure."

A dog and a cat are different species precisely because their DNA has a different structure!!

Evolution must claim that the DNA structure of one "species" can be randomly mutated into the DNA structure of a new and improved "species." But this is literally like claiming a new and improved computer program could be created by randomly making changes to the binary code of another computer program.

Of course the evolutionists know this is impossible so they use another tactic to deceive people. They claim that there is no difference between microevolution and macroevolution. By doing this they can use examples from microevolution and claim they are true examples of "evolution."

Macroevolution is a false theory because it is impossible to take a highly complex computer program (i.e. the DNA for a species) and mutate it via random accidents (meaning via evolution) into a NEW AND IMPROVED species with a new and improved DNA strand.

But the atheists, such as Richard Dawkins, intentionally obfuscate the terms microevolution and macroevolution in order to get converts. For example, in the book: The Greatest Show On Earth, atheist Richard Dawkins uses example after example of microevolution and claims they are examples of true evolution, which is macroevolution. The entire book is a giant lie because there has never been a proven example of macroevolution.

In short, in 1882, when Darwin died, his theory of evolution was correct BASED ON WHAT DARWIN KNEW AT THE TIME. It could not be disproven until 1953 when DNA was discovered.

Another topic which has already been mentioned is that Natural Selection has absolutely nothing to do with the theory of evolution!! The issue of evolution is not about how animals are DESTROYED by Natural Selection, the issue is how animals are CREATED by a series of accidents!!

Considering all of the species which exist on this earth, and especially the species which have both a male and female (e.g. humans and deer and turtles); and that for species which have both a male and female, the male and female had to come to exist at about the same time and place on this earth so they could have offspring; and their respective DNA must align in an unbelievably sophisticated way so they could have both male and female offspring; to think that all of the DNA for these many species happened by a series of accidents is ludicrous.

For example, turtles aren't real fast and most of them aren't real big, so how did the first male turtle and first female turtle find each other on this gigantic planet of ours (gigantic from their perspective)? God probably put a few thousand pairs of turtles on this planet in each of several different areas.


A Summary and Overview Of Some Key Issues

If scientists are so smart, and believe that God does not exist, can they create a Universe with a planet like Earth that has more than a million species, many of which have both a male and female? Let's think about it.

What is the difference between "creating" a brand new Buick versus "destroying" a brand new Buick by driving it over a cliff??

The difference is that the new Buick being driven off the cliff must have been created before it was driven over a cliff.

How does driving a Buick over a cliff help explain how the Buick got created in the first place?? It doesn't.

So how does finding the remains of an extinct animal (i.e. its fossil) tell us how it was created?? It doesn't. All it tells us is that this animal used to be alive, but now it is dead.

An animal must be alive before it is dead. A fossil does not tell us how an animal was created, it only tells us that the animal is dead.

But even extinct animals had to have DNA and their DNA had to create them either from an enclosed egg (e.g. a chicken egg) or a fertilized egg (e.g. humans or monkeys).

Every animal on this planet, including humans, came from a single DNA strand which was inside of an egg. Whether they came from an enclosed egg (i.e. a chicken egg) or a single fertilized egg in a mother, the animal (including humans) came from a single object and then morphed over time into what it was when it was young and eventually died.

So the evolution debate is not about where bones came from, it is about where DNA came from. How did "morphing of the embryo" algorithms come to exist for many, many complex species, especially when there is a male and female in the species?

The evolution debate is therefore about statistics. There are so many past and present highly sophisticated DNA strands for both extinct and living animals that the theory of evolution has become ludicrous.

But it is not just about the creation of DNA, it is also about viable permutations of nucleotides on DNA. Even if DNA could be built, the probability it has a viable permutation to create an animal from a single cell is mathematically insane.

It is far beyond the scope of this home page to talk about many subjects. But trust me: the probability of a viable permutation of nucleotides, to create both a male and female for a single advanced species (the permutation of nucleotides on the DNA would have to be almost perfect in order to perform the morphing of the embryo for both a male and female offspring), etc. is so ludicrous it could not happen a single time in the estimated age of this Universe or a billion consecutive Universes.

In summary, here are just a few reasons evolution (i.e. accidents) could never have created human beings:
1) Creating DNA from scratch (e.g. for the "first living cell") is impossible for many reasons (humans still cannot do it),
2) Creating a cell from scratch, by accident, is impossible for many reasons (the inside of a cell is like a small city) (humans cannot do it),
3) Creating life from non-life is impossible and has never been done (though it has been attempted),
4) Creating the mechanisms in the cell, which use the DNA as patterns to create proteins, is impossible to happen by accident. For example, how does this mechanism know WHERE on the DNA a specific protein code is located? Only 3% of DNA is coded for proteins (the "WHERE" issue is a topic by itself),
5) Obtaining a viable permutation of nucleotides on DNA, that could create a human baby, is statistically impossible. It would be far more likely to pick a single atom which is hidden among many, many quadrillions of Universes. This is NOT an exaggeration!!
6) And so on.

But even if scientists could create a cell from scratch, would their "new cell" be alive? The answer is 'no' because scientists don't have a clue what "life" really is.

So how did evolution create a living cell, with DNA or RNA inside, with a viable permutation, with the mechanisms to use the DNA patterns, by pure accident?? Accidents don't create intelligence, just ask any computer programmer how long it would take to write a complex computer program using code written exclusively by random number generators. It would never happen.

So if humans cannot design and create from scratch DNA or RNA, plus a cell for the DNA or RNA to exist inside, and give their new cell "life," with a viable permutation of nucleotides, why would anyone believe that a series of pure accidents (i.e. evolution) could have created the "first living cell" in a sterile pond?

The atheists and evolutionists are great story tellers but they are complete dolts at having a credible explanation of where everything came from.


The Magnitude Of The Problems With The Theory Of Evolution

The above items, and more to come, are just a few of the hundreds of reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true which are discussed on this website.

But I should emphasize that the MAGNITUDE of the reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true is simply beyond comprehension. The permutation issues of the DNA for more than a million species, many with both a male and female, alone would eliminate any chance that the theory of evolution is true. And the construction of DNA is another issue of such magnitude that the theory of evolution simply cannot be true.

Do not look at each reason the theory of evolution cannot be true as being equal with the other reasons. Some reasons are massive enough, by themselves, to make the theory of evolution completely ludicrous!!!

Now I want to make it very clear that many students have been fooled by the atheists and evolutionists. This is nothing to be ashamed of. The atheists have perfected the art of deception, they are well-organized, very well-funded and their deceptions are highly polished!!!

Atheists don't want a God to exist because a God would be massively smarter than they are. So most of them do everything in their vivid imaginations to pretend there is no God and to claim that everything in the Universe came to exist by pure chance. God is replaced by mindless accidents.


The Evolution Debate

While there are more than 350 books which are favorable to the theory of evolution there are also more than 350 books which are strongly critical of the theory of evolution!!

There are also many YouTube videos on both sides of the debate.

Those who are critical of the theory of evolution are called "creation scientists" or "creationists" because they believe the scientific data favors a "Creator" of the Universe.

In fact, if you want to get published in a leading biology journal you better be an atheist and your article better support the theory of evolution. If it does not praise evolution your article will end up in the trash can, not in a "science" journal.

From the incomprehensible sophistication of DNA, to the amazing complexity of cells, to the earth we live on, to the ends of the Milky Way Galaxy, to the furthest galaxy cluster and supercluster (by the way, the supercluster we live in is called the Laniakea Supercluster), and considering the "constants" in physics (e.g. the gravitational constant); the credibility of the theory of evolution has dropped to ABSOLUTE ZERO!!!



Note: In order to prevent this home page from becoming massively too big, some topics, which would normally be put on the home page, have been moved to their own article.



Detailed Articles On Special Topics


Article: The Sixteen Cells Mystery

Hold on to your seatbelt, it is not just the computer programs on the DNA that control the "morphing of the embryo" that are incomprehensible, it is the way that the morphing algorithms work!! There is no computer program on this planet that could be designed to work the way the "morphing of the embryo" algorithms work.

Here is an article that traces the "morphing of the embryo" until there are 16 cells in the fetus. This article demonstrates that DNA should not even be called a computer program. In this article you will learn why no team of computer programmers on earth could even begin to replicate the way that DNA works!!!
Article: The Sixteen Cells Mystery!! [Read the entire article!!!]


Article: The Hidden Agenda Of Atheists

There is far more to the theory of evolution than just a claim that there is no God. As this article shows, the real agenda of the theory of evolution turns out to be a mirror-image of the Gospel of Jesus Christ!!
Article: The Hidden Agenda Of The Atheists


Article: The Use Of Clever Definitions

There is absolutely no scientific evidence to justify the theory of evolution. So what do the atheists and evolutionists do to generate bogus "evidence" for the theory of evolution??

One way is the use of very, very clever definitions. By using clever definitions the atheists and evolutionists can create "evidence" for the theory of evolution out of thin air, so to speak.

In other words, they can use a scientific fact which has absolutely nothing to do with the creation of new DNA (which is required for evolution to be true) and like a magician they can create imaginary evidence for the theory of evolution.

This article goes into more depth on this issue:
Article: The Trick of Using Clever Definitions By The Atheists And Evolutionists


Article: Fifteen Reasons The Theory of Evolution Cannot Be True

While there are hundreds of reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true, this article is a list of fifteen of the best reasons evolution cannot be true plus this article digs much deeper into the DNA issues which destroy the theory of evolution:
Article: Fifteen Reasons Evolution Cannot Be True (Very Important To Read)


Article: Twenty Reasons Evolution Cannot Be True

This is similar to the Fifteen Reasons article but has a slightly different list and adds more items so it is somewhat different:
Article: Twenty Reasons Evolution Cannot Be True


Article: Twenty-Five Reasons Evolution Cannot Be True

This is similar to the Twenty Reasons article but changes and adds more items so it is somewhat of a different list:
Article: Twenty-Five Reasons Evolution Cannot Be True


Article: More Than Four-Hundred Reasons Why The Theory of Evolution Cannot Be True

Here is a list of more than 400 reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true. In each case an item is listed that could not have happened by a series of accidents. This article will open as a new window:
Article: More Than 400 Reasons Why The Theory of Evolution Cannot Be True


Article: The Complexity of Cells (and 3 YouTube Videos)

There is human DNA inside of every cell (except some red blood cells), but human DNA is not the only highly sophisticated object inside the cells. There are many other complex objects, some of which were created by the genes on the DNA. Cells are unbelievably complex!!

In the book: Essential Cell Biology, Third Edition, a section header on page 410 reads: Transmitter-gated Channels in Target Cells Convert Chemical Signals Into Electrical Signals." This is not something you read in the comic section of the newspaper.

Cells could not have been created by a series of accidents!!

For more information about the complexity of cells, see this article:
Article: The Complexity of Cells (Includes 3 YouTube Videos!!)


Article: Could a Simple Cell Exist?

Evolutionists understand the problems with creating a human cell from scratch, so they claim that the "first living cell" was a simple cell and that numerous increasingly complex types of cells "evolved" between the "first living cell" and human cells.

First of all, there are no "simple cells." Even the simplest cell on this earth has DNA (except for some red blood cells, however, there is no way these red blood cells can divide!!) and inside each cell is also an incredible, miniature factory.

For more information about whether a simple cell could exist, see this article:
Article: Could A Simple Cell Exist?


Article: Comparing DNA to Computer Programs

Ponder this carefully: every one of the millions of complex, or even moderately complex, computer programs on this planet was written by human beings. NONE OF THEM were written by random number generators to simulate the way that evolution must work!!! Every computer program has been written by intelligent human beings who studied computer languages and programming!!

This article logically looks at why DNA could not have come to exist by chance:
Article: Comparing DNA to Computer Programs


Article: Why Do We Need Computer Programmers??

The DNA for more than a million different species are vastly superior to any computer program written by any team of computer programmers!!

So if randomness (i.e. evolution) created all of the most sophisticated computer programs on earth (i.e. DNA) then randomness should also be able to design the far, far less sophisticated computer programs used by businesses, the military, individuals, etc.

This article provides another viewpoint to the evolution debate:
Article: Why Do We Need Computer Programmers?


Article: Pride Is The Driving Force Of The Theory of Evolution

This article details exactly why the theory of evolution exists!! The answer is pride. Many atheists and evolutionists cannot stand to think that someone might be smarter than they are, much less MASSIVELY smarter than they are!!
Article: Pride Is The Driving Force Of The Theory Of Evolution


Article: What Did Darwin Know?

Charles Darwin knew nothing about cells and he knew nothing about the DNA inside of those cells. In fact, based on what scientists knew in Darwin's day, the data that Darwin had access to fully supported his theory of evolution!! It was not until 1953, with the discovery of DNA, that Darwin's theories could be disproven!!

This article is actually in defense of Darwin based on what scientists knew in his day!!
Article: What Did Darwin Know?


Article: A Challenge To The Atheists and Evolutionists

The atheists and evolutionists claim that all DNA can be created by a series of accidents either from scratch or by the modification of an existing DNA strand.

This article poses a challenge to the atheists and evolutionist to prove their theories are credible:
Article: A Challenge To The Atheists and Evolutionists


The Two Free eBooks On This Website

Chapter Summary: Medium-size eBook (37 pages, pdf file): Patterns of Intelligence - Chapter Summary

If you want a quick, high level overview of the Patterns of Intelligence book, this article has a short summary of each chapter in the 266 page medium-size this book:
Summary: Patterns of Intelligence - Chapter Summary Only


Technical Medium-Size eBook: (266 pages, pdf file): Patterns of Intelligence

While the large book on this website is the "B-2 Bomber" of anti-evolution books, this book is the "F-22 Raptor" of anti-evolution books. This free book is actually much more current on the issues of the great scientific deceptions which are going on and the mathematical reasons evolution cannot be true. However, it does not go into the depth of the long book on the mathematical reasons evolution cannot be true.

Did you know that if you listed all major LDS doctrines (i.e. Latter-Day Saint or Mormon) and then took the opposite of each of these doctrines you would end up with the theory of evolution doctrines!! This book will produce such a detailed list in Chapter 2.

In this book you will see one of the main arguments of the large book, called "Patterns of Intelligence." This eBook has some really cool graphs.

But there are many things in the medium size book which are not in the large book. For example, chapters 22 and 23 of this book contain an amazing discussion which demonstrates that there is nowhere near enough information on DNA to control the "morphing of the embryo" algorithms!! Either God Himself designed DNA (and we cannot even remotely understand it) or the morphing of the embryo has help from the other side of the veil. There is no other option!!

Here is a link to the medium-sized book in one file. As always, you are welcome to read it online, download it, or print it out:
Free eBook: Patterns of Intelligence (pdf file)

Here is a link to the individual chapters in the medium-sized book. Each chapter is a file so it is easy to focus on one chapter at a time:
Free eBook: Patterns of Intelligence (pdf file for each chapter)


Technical Long eBook: (407 pages, pdf file): Prophets or Evolution - An LDS Perspective

This book is the "B-2 Bomber" of anti-evolution books. It demolishes the theory of evolution time after time and takes no enemies. The discovery of DNA has created an avalanche of ways to prove the theory of evolution is scientific nonsense.

This free eBook is available in both HTML and PDF formats and both versions can be looked at online or can be downloaded. For example, you can download the PDF version and print it out so you can mark it up. As always, you don't even need to tell me you downloaded it!!

The long eBook is called "Prophets or Evolution - An LDS Perspective," which:
1) Compares the doctrines of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (i.e. LDS church) to the theory of evolution (chapters 1-12),
2) Details many of the massive scientific problems with the theory of evolution (chapters 13-36).

The book in HTML format (by chapter):
Free eBook: Prophets or Evolution - An LDS Perspective (html version)

A printable version of the entire book (407 pages) is available in pdf format and can be read or downloaded from this link. It can also be printed out:
Free eBook: Prophets Or Evolution - An LDS Perspective (pdf file)


Chapter of Long Book: "Seven Scientific Reasons ... Evolution Cannot be True"

The complete "Prophets or Evolution" book is over 400 pages. This is a link to one of the key chapters in the main eBook. This chapter is a high level overview of seven of the main scientific reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true. It also mentions seven other reasons evolution cannot be true. Here is a link to this chapter:
Chapter: Seven Scientific Reasons the Theory of Evolution Cannot be True


Other Anti-Evolution Books

If you listen to the propaganda of the pro-evolution monopoly you might think that anyone who believes in creation science is a dolt. Nothing could be further from the truth. There are many "creation scientists" (i.e. those who believe God created this Universe) who are brilliant and have no problems seeing through the false science generated by the scientific establishment.

In fact, many anti-evolution books have been written by brilliant scientists. This listing of anti-evolution books and DVDs contains only a small sampling of the anti-evolution books which exist in print. In fact, there are more than 200 anti-evolution books.

Many of the books were written by PhDs in the sciences. The arguments in these books totally shred the theory of evolution from a scientific standpoint.

Some of these books may be out of print and you may have to use a book finder, such as Alibris, to find them.

Here is a link to this appendix:
Appendix: Books and Movies Against the Theory of Evolution


Additional Section Of Articles On Specific Topics

NOTE: Not all links below are to this website.

If you live in Utah, Idaho, Nevada, Arizona, Wyoming or New Mexico, please do me a favor. Have one of your children (or you) find out the name and authors of the biology textbook which is being used in their high school. Then send me the city and state, and the name of the book(s) along with the names of the authors. The authors names are important because many biology books have the same title, such as "Biology." I need to know what is actually being taught in these states for future reference.

Also, if you could find out whether this book is used statewide or whether each school district gets to pick their own textbook on Biology.

My email address is at the bottom of this page. Thanks In Advance!!

The rest of this section for Latter-Day Saints provides key information for the youth and adults.



Article: The First Book To Describe the Theory of Evolution Was NOT Written By Darwin

Most people think that Darwin wrote the first book to describe the theory of evolution. Actually, the Book of Mormon described the theory of evolution, including natural selection, about 29 years before Darwin's first book on evolution was published. The Book of Mormon actually has two sets of versus which discuss the theory of evolution and in both cases the Book of Mormon is not at all supportive of those who teach the theory of evolution. In other words, in both cases the Book of Mormon was very, very critical of those who teach the theory of evolution even before the theory of evolution existed!!
Article: The First Book To Describe the Theory of Evolution Was NOT Written By Darwin


Article: Where Did God Come From?

So if many Christian churches, including the Mormon/LDS church, claim that God created all species, it is perfectly fair to ask: Where did God come from?

While no one knows the full answer to this question, this article will dig into the subject based on what we have been told by the prophets, both ancient and modern.
Article: Where Did God Come From?


Article: Prophetic Book of Mormon Warnings

This short article goes into more detail about prophets and evolution than what I just mentioned. However, if you plan on reading the Patterns of Intelligence book mentioned below, which is over 260 pages long, it is not necessary to read this article.
Article: Prophetic Book of Mormon Warnings (pdf file)


Spreadsheet: Alma 30: Doctrines of Korihor and Evolution

As a support to the above article, this spreadsheet shows the vast differences between what Korihor taught (i.e. what evolution teaches) and LDS doctrine. This spreadsheet goes verse by verse in Alma chapter 30 and explains the similarities between the teachings of Korihor and the doctrines of the theory of evolution. It also shows how each is the opposite of LDS doctrine:
Spreadsheet: Doctrines of Korihor and Evolution (Excel 2003 file)


Article: The War In Heaven Comes to Earth (Bible and LDS)

Before Adam and Eve were put on this earth there was a war in heaven between the forces of Christ and the forces of Lucifer, who would later become "the devil."

This article goes into detail about the war in heaven that determined who would be born on this planet and who would not!!
Article: The War In Heaven


Article: Why The Confusion About Evolution?

The intentional deceptions of evolutionists, by the use of clever terminology, are why there is such a wide diversity of opinions about evolution among LDS scientists. Very few members of the church understand the sophistication of the deceptions of the scientific establishment.

While these discussions are also in the Patterns of Intelligence book, if you want a quick lesson in understanding the deceptive definitions used by the scientific establishment, this article is for you.
Article: Why The Confusion About Evolution


Statement: The 1909 Official Statement of the First Presidency of the LDS Church

The 1909 statement of the First Presidency on the theory of evolution remains the official document of the church on the theory of evolution. This statement in 1909 was reprinted in the 2002 Ensign. It remains not only the official doctrine of the church, but the best description of the origin of man outside of the scriptures!! It is highly, highly recommended to the reader to study this document very carefully!!! It is unlike anything else you can read on the subject of evolution!!

Here is a link to this magnificent article:
Statement: "The Origin of Man" (Official 1909 First Presidency Statement)

Here is a 14 page article with my comments about the 1909 and 1910 statements of the First Presidency. My comments focus of the relationship between the statements of the First Presidency and what scientists knew between 1909 and 1953:
Article: Understanding the Context of the 1909 and 1910 Statements of the First Presidency


Booklet: True To the Faith (First Presidency)

In addition to the 1909 article, an official booklet issued by the First Presidency in 2004: True to the Faith - A Gospel Reference, while not specifically about evolution, describes church doctrines which are the very antithesis of the doctrines of the theory of evolution (e.g. See topics: Atonement of Jesus Christ; Creation; Fall; God the Father; etc.). This booklet is available on www.lds.org:
Booklet: True to the Faith (Official 2004 First Presidency Booklet)


Talk: The Nature of God!! (Talks by Elder Jeffrey R. Holland)

What kind of being is God?? To those who fear they may have sinned beyond the range of the atonement, there is a magnificent message in this general conference talk about the true nature of God!!
Conference Talk: He Hath Filled the Hungry with Good Things

In this conference talk Elder Holland gives us a feel for the love of God towards us.
Conference Talk: The Grandeur of God


Talk: The Prophetic Future of the LDS Church (Talk by President Spencer W. Kimball)

Do you want to know the future of the LDS church? A general conference talk by President Spencer W. Kimball provides a clear vision of what the future of the LDS church will be.
Article: The Prophetic Future of the LDS Church


Talk: The False Gods We Worship (Article by President Spencer W. Kimball)

This classic article by President Spencer W. Kimball explains about the false gods some members of the church (and to some degree all of us) worship. Its lesson applies directly to the youth of the church!!
Article: The False Gods We Worship


Talk: Beware of the Evil Behind the Smiling Eyes (Talk by Elder Neil L. Anderson)

Many attempts to lead the youth of the church astray are made by those who appear to be harmless or even friendly. This talk by Elder Neil L. Anderson, of the Quorum of the Twelve, is a warning to the youth of the church about those with "smiling eyes" who are not who they claim to be.
Article: Beware of the Evil Behind the Smiling Eyes


Quotes: The Power of God and the Future of the Church

These two articles contains quotes from the scriptures and from the living prophets and apostles about the power of God, the future of the LDS church and the final triumph of good over evil.
Quotes: The Power of God and the Future of the Church - Scriptures
Quotes: The Power of God and the Future of the Church - Prophets
Quotes: Various Quotes From LDS Sources


Article: The Role and Importance of the LDS Church President

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints is led by a "living prophet." This article is designed to clarify the role and importance of the President of the LDS church. It is mostly quotes of several prominent church leaders about the role and importance of the LDS church President.
Quotes: The Role and Importance of the LDS Church President


Quotes: About Church Membership

These are quotes about membership in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. The quotes come from the prophets and apostles.
Quotes About Church Membership


Website: Quotes of LDS Prophets and Apostles

This website has quotes from all of the Presidents of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and many of the Apostles of the church. There are many very powerful quotes on this website.
Quotes of LDS Prophets and Apostles


Video: Creation and Evolution - A Witness of Prophets

This is an outstanding video dealing with the theory of evolution, and especially the quotes of living prophets regarding the theory of evolution.

The official position of the LDS church on the theory of evolution is made very clear in this video!! Many quotes of presidents of the church and modern apostles are presented.

This video is highly recommended for anyone who wonders how the church leaders feel about Darwin and his theory of evolution.

To Obtain a Copy, Visit:
Video: Creation and Evolution



Other LDS Websites on Evolution

This is a web page that links to other websites which discuss LDS doctrine versus the theory of evolution:
Links to Other Websites

Here is an old version of the "Patterns of Intelligence" book:
Patterns of Intelligence (Old HTML Version)



To Learn More About the LDS Church

To learn more about the LDS church, here is their official website to introduce people to the LDS church:
To Learn About the LDS Church
The Official Church Website

Here is a website that has many quotes by many of the apostles and prophets of the LDS church, on a variety of topics:
Living Prophet Website


Church Policy

Even though the LDS Church officially rejects the theory of evolution (see the 1909 Statement, linked to above, and the Book of Mormon, Alma chapter 30, among many other documents), no book or article which is involved in scientific debates or which discusses the scientific issues of the theory of evolution, even if it strongly supports official church doctrine, is endorsed by the LDS church unless it is part of an official church publication.

The gospel deals with eternal and unchanging truths but all of the fields of science constantly change as new discoveries are made. Thus, the church does not establish any scientific claim as being absolute.

As a result, the books and articles written by R. Webster Kehr represent the opinions of the author and are too scientific to be published or endorsed by the LDS church.


About The Author, R. Webster Kehr

This website is a product of R. Webster Kehr, who lives in Missouri, near Kansas City. I have two college degrees from Brigham Young University: a B.S. in mathematics (1972) and a B.S. in accounting (1974).

I am a retired cancer researcher (of natural medicine) and before retiring I worked with more than ten thousand cancer patients. I wrote almost all of the articles on the www.cancertutor.com website. This is one of the articles on why the average person knows nothing truthful about cancer:
Why Everything You Know About Cancer Is Wrong

My favorite cancer treatment on that website is the Dirt Cheap Protocol:
Dirt Cheap Protocol

It turns out that natural cancer treatments are far, far more effective than orthodox cancer treatments. The www.cancertutor.com website is a great resource for all cancer patients.

My wife Marit, who died May 7, 2016, was from Norway. We met in Provo, Utah a month before I left on my mission to California (back then there were 3 missions in California, now there are more than 20 missions in California). She was a genealogist and we have seven children and 20 grandchildren, scattered from Idaho to South Carolina.

My email address is below. Whether you have a question or a comment, please feel free to email me. I love to communicate with people about the theory of evolution.

Don't forget to email all of your friends about this website!! And above all, please use social media to spread the word about this website!!!!!!!!!

(My email address is camouflaged to avoid web crawlers)


Note: Due to changes in search engine algorithms, this area is reserved for additional keywords:
This website is primarily about Prophets versus Evolution, meaning Evolution versus Prophets.
This is an intelligent Design article for Mormons or Latter-Day Saints.
And this manuscript also deals with Prophets versus Darwin, meaning Darwin versus Prophets.
It includes detailed discussions about Prophets or Evolution in addition to Evolution or Prophets.
This website discusses in detail the topic of intelligent design for Mormonism.
Included are large discussions about Mormonism versus Evolution, and furthermore Evolution versus Mormonism.
Creation Scientists forget that God without Living Prophets is like mashed potatoes without gravy.
Intense discussions and debates about Mormonism or Evolution as opposed to Evolution or Mormonism are part of this website.
This LDS website, loyal to LDS doctrines, is mainly about Mormons versus Darwin, meaning Darwin versus Mormons.
This LDS website, by a member, is about Mormons versus Evolution, meaning Evolution versus Mormons.
These free articles and books are clearly and intentionally about intelligent Design website for Mormons.
This site also includes long discussions regarding Mormonism versus Darwin, plus Darwin versus Mormonism.
This website about living prophets and evolution does not forget to discuss Mormonism or Intelligent Design.
The details do not exclude the issues of Prophets or Darwin in addition to Darwin or Prophets.
This website definitely is mainly about Mormons or Darwin and not incidentally about Darwin or Mormons.
It intentionally includes discussions about Mormons or Evolution and not accidentally about Evolution or Mormons.
This website carefully includes the important topic of intelligent design and Mormonism.
There is no doubt that this website is an intelligent Design for Latter-Day Saints or Mormons website.
Creation Scientists remember to talk about God, but they forget to talk about living prophets.
What good is God without Living Prophets to lead the people of God? But it is primarily about Mormonism or Darwin as opposed to Darwin or Mormonism.
This prophets or evolution website includes chapters and discussions about Mormonism and Intelligent Design.
There is no doubt at all that this website is inclusive of intelligent Design for Mormons.


Version: 2/13/2017