Welcome To The "Prophets Or Evolution" Website

This website is about the theory of evolution debate. This website has four free eBooks and dozens of free articles. Nothing is sold on this website. Links from one article to another are in blue and if you click a blue link the new article will generally open in a new window so you won't lose your place. Items in green are informational items and are not links.

It is strongly suggested that you start by reading this home page first!!! The home page was designed to be a broad overview of the evolution debate. At times the home page will link to other articles so that those who are interested in more information about a specific topic can immediately dig deeper into the subject.

For those who want to dig really deep into the evolution debate, here is an article which lists (and links to) most of the articles on this website (remember click on a blue link):
Some Of The Key Articles On This Website

When you are ready to read one or more of the four free eBooks on this website, here is an article which links to the four free eBooks on this website (and it links to an article which mentions more than 400 reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true). Two of the four eBooks have links to the individual chapters of the book:
Article: Quick Links To Four Anti-Evolution Books by R. Webster Kehr

So welcome aboard and let the home page begin!!!

About The Author (A Retired World-Famous Cancer Researcher) And The Truth About Cancer

My name is R. Webster Kehr. I live in Missouri, near Kansas City. I am an ex-Marine, Viet Nam veteran who was seriously wounded in action. Yes, I have a purple heart and many, many scars. By profession, I am a retired world-famous cancer researcher of natural medicine who worked with more than ten thousand cancer patients before retiring.

The rest of this section is about why everything you know about cancer is a lie and why natural cancer treatments are vastly superior to orthodox cancer treatments (i.e. chemotherapy, radiation and surgery).

If you have no interest in the truth about cancer, then skip down to the next section (which has a different color background).

Let me tell you the truth about cancer. Cancer is NOT caused by DNA damage, it is caused by a bacteria, Helicobacter Pylori. This bacteria was first found inside of cancer cells in 1890 (not a typo). If you kill the bacteria which are inside the cancer cells, which is easy to do with natural medicine, the cancer cells will revert into healthy cells!!! Why kill a sick cell?? Well, there is nothing wrong with safely killing cancer cells.

In fact, natural medicine cancer researchers were curing cancer with herbs (in America) and homeopathic formulas (in Europe) long before 1890!!! There are many things in nature that will kill cancer cells. And now we know many ways to revert cancer cells into normal cells!!!

Cancer cells can be dealt with in three different ways:
1) Kill the cancer cells (e.g. with herbs),
2) Kill the bacteria inside the cancer cells and the cancer cells will revert into normal cells (e.g. mix honey with turmeric powder),
3) Build the immune system with natural products and let the immune system deal with the cancer.

Let me talk about the second item. I mentioned mixing honey and turmeric powder. Cancer cells love sweets!!! So the cancer cells gobble up the honey. But by mixing honey with turmeric the turmeric gets inside the cancer cells so the termeric can kill the bacteria and the cancer cells revert into normal cells when the bacteria are dead!!! The honey is a Trojan Horse to get the turmeric inside the cancer cells.

But this is only one treatment. A typical natural cancer treatment today will have 15 or so natural items (or electromagnetic equipment which generate key frequencies to kill the bacteria) to deal with the cancer via killing the cancer cells, reverting them into normal cells (by killing the bacteria inside the cancer cells) or building the immune system and let the immune system help deal with the cancer. However, there are safety rules which is why you have to work with an expert. I will talk about them in a moment.

I will bet that you did not know that cancer cells can be converted into healthy cells!!!

As another example, in the 1930s Dr. Royal Rife, a microbiologist, had a 100% cure rate for cancer patients and the only thing his equipment did was produce precise frequencies (with a carrier wave) to kill the bacteria inside of cancer cells!!! The cancer cells reverted into healthy cells!!! His equipment has been replicated with high-tech electronics!! These are the GB-4000 SR-4 and the GB-4000 M.O.P.A. electromedicine devices which can be found on the www.CancerTutor.com website.

The Dirt Cheap Protocol, also on the www.CancerTutor.com website, is a perfect place to start to learn how to cure cancer. I will link to that article in a moment.

But work with the experts (i.e. www.CancerTutor.com) no matter what you do.


What Causes Cancer??

Two well-deserved Nobel Prizes in medicine were given for the discovery that the definition of a cancer cell is a cell with low ATP energy!!! This is one of the few things that both orthodox medicine and natural medicine agree on. The big question is this: why does a cancer cell have low ATP energy??

Orthodox medicine claims that DNA damage causes this low ATP energy and the natural medicine people (who know how to cure cancer) say that a bacteria is responsible for the low ATP energy!!!

The claim of orthodox medicine that cancer is caused by DNA damage is a STUPID theory!!! While in theory it is possible, DNA is a GIGANTIC molecule with about 3,200,000,000 nucleotide pairs!!! DNA damage could occur anywhere on the DNA stand!!! But to cause cancer the DNA damage (i.e. to cause low levels of ATP molcules) would have to occur in an incredibly, incredibly, incredibly, incredibly, incredibly small section of DNA where the DNA contains the patterns to create the enzymes necessary to convert glucose into pyruvate and then into ATP molecules!!!

The claim that DNA damage can cause cancer is technically true, but the claim is so statistically idiotic that I doubt there is a single cancer patient in America, at any given time, who has cancer caused by DNA damage!!! Plus every cell takes very, very, very good care of its DNA!!!

In fact, there is a very, very simple test which can prove that DNA damage does not cause cancer for a specific cancer case. I talk about this simple test in one of my articles on cancer. I can assure you that every cancer cell has pefectly good DNA and that there are bacteria inside of every cancer cell!!!

What do you think the 5-year cure rate of orthodox medicine (i.e. Big Pharma) is (e.g. chemotherapy, radiation and surgery - though surgery is not the problem)??? The answer is a pathetic 2.1%!!! That is totally unacceptable!!!! I talk about this in my introduction article on cancer which I link to in a moment.


More About Natural Cancer Treatments

The experts who work with the www.CancerTutor.com website can walk you through the process of treating your cancer naturally. A typical natural cancer treatment will include around 15 or so natural cancer treatments and you will be working with an expert who knows the safety rules and they know what works!!!

If you want to see an example of a natural medicine cancer treatment study the Dirt Cheap Protocol (this is a blue link to another article on the Cancer Tutor website):
Article: Dirt Cheap Protocol!!!

But do not use this protocol to treat your cancer, work with the experts at the Independent Cancer Research Foundation (ICRF) who work from the www.CancerTutor.com website.

To prevent cancer (unless you already have it and don't know it) take 2 Protandim pills a day and/or 12 ounces of unsweetened purple grape juice every day (yes, purple). The people at the ICRF (i.e. www.CancerTutor.com) are not allowed to mention Protandim because the people at the company that makes Protandim (LifeVantage) are afraid of the FDA. I guess they don't they know that Utah has two United States Senators and four United States Congressmen/Congresswomen to deal with the absolute corruption in the FDA (the FDA is nothing but the private police force of Big Pharma)!!!

Protandim is sold multi-level marketing but it may be available on Amazon. Just don't mention cancer if you talk to one of the sales people. For advanced cancer patients take ten or twelve Protandim a day (in addition to what the ICRF people tell you), but not at the same time. Take two Protandim every two hours until the daily pills are gone.

If you think that natural cancer experts don't know what they are talking about, spend a couple of hours studying this article on that same website - slowly page all the way to the bottom!!!!!!!:
Article: The ICRF Reference Manual!!!

Do not use that Reference Manual to design a treatment for cancer, let the experts at the www.CancerTutor.com website work with you to design your treatment and make sure you follow the safety rules. Do this even if you use the Dirt Cheap Protocol!!! Here is how to contact them:
Article: Contact Us!!!

This Prophets Or Evolution website has several articles about natural cancer treatments. Here is my introduction article on natural cancer treatments:
Article: Introduction To Highly Effective Natural Cancer Treatments!!!

At the bottom of this home page, which has a yellow background, there is a link to an article that links to several other articles on natural cancer treatments on this website and it links to articles on the most famous of all natural cancer treatment websites (which has the Reference Manual): www.CancerTutor.com!! Remember, the organization that runs that website has the EXPERTS who work 1-on-1 with cancer patients!!! They live in Utah but they work with cancer patients all over the world.

My email address is in the very bottom section of this home page.

Don't forget to tell your friends about this website on social media!!! They will learn the truth about both cancer and evolution for free!!

So let's get started talking about the theory of evolution!!!

 


 

Welcome To The www.ProphetsOrEvolution.com Website

There are two basic doctrines about where we came from.

First, all religions, by definition, claim that God created Adam and Eve and that Adam and Eve are on our genealogy chart.

Second, those who support the theory of evolution claim that God does not exist and that Adam and Eve never existed and that humans "evolved" from some other primate, such as bonobo or chimpanzee or monkey, etc.

So in its simplest form the evolution debate is the question: do we have on our genealogy chart Adam and Eve or do we have some bonobo or chimpanzee or monkey on our pedigree chart???

If we are descended from Adam and Eve, they would have had exactly the same DNA as modern humans. But if we "evolved" from bonobos (or any other primate), the atheists and evolutionists must explain where bonobo DNA came from (i.e. without God) and how did bonobo DNA "evolve" into human DNA, both male and female. Much will be said on this website about these very questions.

By doing away with God the atheists and evolutionists also do away with the Biblical claim that Jesus Christ was the literal Son of God. No one can claim that Jesus Christ did not exist because there are many ancient documents, even other than the Bible, which mention Him.

So let us start this discussion with a quote from the late Latter-Day Saint (i.e. Mormon) scholar Robert J. Matthews (who died in 2009) in his, "Origin of Man: The Doctrinal Famework":

  • "The erosive effects of this theory [i.e. the theory of evolution] are subtle, and it may not appear harmful to many at first. However, because of evolution's inherent opposition to the mission of the Messiah, it may possibly be that in connection with this subject, more than with any other, everyone must eventually and individually answer Pilate's question, 'What shall I do then with Jesus which is called Christ'?" (Matthew 27:22.)
    Section: Summary and Conclusion (last paragraph)

Let me summarize what he said: "If satan were to design his perfect doctrine to draw people away from a belief in the Godhead, including the divinity of Christ, it would be the theory of evolution!!! The theory of evolution is the religion of atheism!!!! Yet this very doctrine, which is not only scientific nonsense, but the religion of atheism, is taught in many, many schools!!!

You might want to read his quote two or three times because it is razor sharp in accuracy. Dr. Matthews makes it very, very clear that the theory of evolution debate is ultimately a claim that there are no Gods (i.e. there is no Godhead)!!! In the Mormon religion there are three Gods (Heavenly Father, Jesus Christ and the Holy Ghost). Some other Christian religions claim there is one God who has three forms (i.e. Heavenly Father, Jesus Christ and the Holy Ghost are the same God).

Dr. Matthews, who represented the Latter-Day Saint (i.e. Mormon) religion before his death, was absolutely correct!! The theory of evolution is designed to convert people who believe in God over to people who believe that we "evolved" from lower primates!!! Because of the theory of evolution, many people no longer believe in Heavenly Father or the mission of the Messiah or in the Holy Ghost!!!

The theory of evolution is also very, very, very bad science, as I mention in hundreds of different ways on this website!!!

For example, if evolution is true, the atheists and evolutionists must explain how the DNA of bonobos or monkeys or baboons, etc. (which obviously have vastly different DNA than humans) became human DNA!!!

So what may start out as a simple question quickly becomes the question: "can the DNA of one species 'evolve' into new and vastly improved DNA to create a vastly improved species?" As I will explain later, in order for bonobo DNA to "evolve" into human DNA (for example) four bonobo DNA strands would need to randomly mutate into four vastly superior human DNA strands!!! The more you know the worse the theory of evolution becomes!!!

Much of this website is about the problems that exist in changing the DNA of one species into the DNA of another species!!! In fact, we could go back much further than bonobos (or apes or whatever) to the "first living cell" which would have been the first life on this planet if evolution were true. I will talk about the "first living cell" issue below in its own section. That is an interesting section.

This website will focus on the scientific issues in this debate but I will tell you how the story ends now: the theory of evolution cannot be true primarily because of the discovery of DNA in 1953 plus the ongoing discoveries of the sophistication of cells and many other issues (e.g. the physical constants)!!!

Those who claim that evolution is true must deal with both the mathematical issues and the physical issues of how the DNA of one species can be changed into a sequence of nucleotides which is not only vastly different, but vastly superior so that a new and improved species can be created (defining a "species" as an animal with a specific DNA sequence/structure) by evolution!!! As you will see, the theory of evolution is not a credible theory after the discovery of DNA and the sophistication of cells!!!

What about the Universe?? No matter where the satellites in space point, every time they point to a dark place in space for a long enough period of time, they will alway find thousands of more galaxies that they didn't know existed!!!

Preachers and ministers and apostles and prophets all claim that God is alive and well. So do not lose site of the fact that while on the surface the evolution debate may be about science, beneath the surface the real debate is about the existence of the Godhead (i.e. Heavenly Father, the Savior and the Holy Ghost)!!!


The Scriptures Predicted The Coming Of The Theory Of Evolution!!

Was God surprised when Darwin's theory of evolution (Darwin's first book came out in 1859) started to convince people that there was no God?? Of course not!!! Both the Bible and the Book of Mormon (the Book of Mormon is also an ancient book written by ancient prophets, but it was mostly written in the Americas) make it very clear that God created Adam and Eve and all animals and that the theory of evolution was coming!!!

In the Book of Mormon there is a story where satan himself appears to a man named Korihor and satan taught Korihor that God did not exist (which is the foundation of the theory of evolution). The great prophet Alma the Younger was not amused by Korihor's request for a sign that God lives and Alma the Younger (via the priesthood) commanded Korihor to be struck dumb (Alma 30: 46-60)!!! (Note: when versus are linked to on the www.lds.org website, the key versus are highlighted). Here is a blue link to that section/chapter:
Book of Mormon: Alma 30:46-60

That should give you an idea of what God (via one of His prophets) thinks about the theory of evolution. And it should also tell you that satan does not support his followers!!! Here is an article on that event:
Article: The Book of Mormon and Evolution - Alma 30: Alma The Younger Versus Korihor

The theory of evolution today is satan's perfect doctrine because it was designed to do away with a belief in the Godhead by claiming that God (i.e. Heavenly Father) and the Holy Ghost do not exist. The atheists and evolutionists cannot claim that Jesus Christ did not exist because there are many ancient documents, even other than the Bible, which mention Him. So the atheists and evolutionists can only claim that Christ did not perform any miracles, such as the raising of the dead and His own resurrection.

But even during Bible times, converting people away from the mission and doctrines of Christ was not appreciated by God. Here is a quote from the Bible (Christ was speaking to the people in His day, but what He said applies today just as well!!):

Matthew 10:33: "33 But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father which is in heaven."

Here is the original source:
Bible - Matthew 10:33:

Here is another example:

Matthew 18:6-7: "6 But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.

7 Woe unto the world because of offences! for it must needs be that offences come; but woe to that man by whom the offence cometh!

Here is the original source:
Bible - Matthew 18:6-7

The Book of Mormon is nowhere near as diplomatic as the Bible (as we already saw with Alma the Younger and Korihor)!!! The Book of Mormon also talks about a punishment called: "like unto the son of perdition" (3 Nephi 29:5-7). There are very specific criteria for that punishment that I talk about in other articles (pay close attention to the phrase "like unto the Son of Perdition"):
Book of Mormon - 3 Nephi 29:5-7

Any punishment with the words "Son of Perdition" as part of the phrase is not something that someone should set as a goal to achieve!!!


Modern Prophets and Apostles

To no ones surprise, even living prophets and apostles have been critical of the theory of evolution. I will link to a talk given by a living apostle, Elder Jeffrey R. Holland, from a speech given at Brigham Young University.

But before you watch it I need to talk about the word "secularism."

Let me quote one of the definitions of "secularism": The indifference to, or rejection or exclusion of, religion and religious considerations. As a philosophy, secularism seeks to interpret life on principles taken solely from the material world, without recourse to religion."
Merriam-Webster Dictionary

Secularism is atheism with a bad attitude!!!

"Secularism" is not only the antithesis of religion, but it can proactively attack religion!! Elder Holland's talk is against secularism!!! Elder Holland wants governments to be more and more connected to religion. Not any specific religion because missionaries of all religions should be welcome in every country (it is called "freedom of religion")!!!

The theory of evolution and secularism certainly overlap but they are not the same thing, but both can be proactive.

Elder Holland mentions many great people over the centuries who have, in some cases, given their lives to spread a belief in God (and in a belief in freedom of religion). In his speech he talks a lot about many great people!!!

In this talk he also mentioned by name four of the best-known atheists/evolutionists:

Here is a quote from this speech and a link to the speech. (Note: if you click on the blue link below the quote, and if you then click the triangle/arrow link on that page (on the BYU website) - you can both watch and read his amazing speech at the same time.)

  • "But of course, not everyone agrees that religion does or should play such an essential role in civilized society. Recently the gloves have come off in the intellectual street fighting being waged under the banner of the “New Atheists.” Figures like Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, Daniel Dennett, and the late Christopher Hitchens are some of the stars in what is, for me, a dim firmament. These men are as free to express their beliefs—or, in their case, ­disbeliefs—as any other, but we feel about them what one Oxford don said about a colleague: “On the surface, he’s profound, but deep down, he’s [pretty] superficial.”
    Speech: Bound By Loving Ties

If I had to summarize his main point in one paragraph, this is what I would say: "Religion has been the driving force for good throughout the centuries and the proper role of government is to preserve and protect freedom of religion for all religions!!! In some instances, a religion needs to be protected from another religion which has political power (or from non-religious groups)!!! Governments should not take sides in such a dispute but should make sure that no religion is harmed in any way by those in the other religion (or non-religious group)."

Note the four well-known atheists/evolutionists that he mentioned by name. I should mention that the Book of Mormon was published in 1830, more than 110 years before Richard Dawkins, one of the people he mentioned, was born!!! And the Book of Mormon was published 29 years before Darwin's first book was published!!! Yes, God didn't like the theory of evolution long before Charles Darwin and Richard Dawkins came along!!! The original prophets who wrote the Book of Mormon finished writing the Book of Mormon in 421 A.D.!!! So even before 421 A.D. God knew that people like Richard Dawkins would exist in the last-days.

All four of the men mentioned by Elder Holland easily fit the criteria for becoming "like unto the Son of Perdition." But this is such a horrific punishment that only God can make the final determination!!! For example, some of the scores of people who currently fit into this category today may repent and be forgiven. Others may not cross the line. God is the only judge.

The words used in 3 Nephi 29:5-7 seem to me to apply only to professional atheists and evolutionists who get paid to write books or to give lectures or to participate in debates and in the process of getting paid they mock the miracles of Christ. I personally do not think these versus apply to teachers and school administrators who are responsible for the theory of evolution being taught in classrooms. These people are not paid primarily for preaching evolution and they hopefully do not mock the miracles of Christ!!! But that is only my opinion.

But also think about this: Adolf Hitler and Mao Zedong (to mention only two mass murderers) can only end up in the Telestial Kingdom which might be a far better place that where Richard Dawkins, et. al. might end up!!! The phrase "son of perdition," which is inside of the phrase "like unto the son or perdition" is not something to be taken lightly and it is almost certainly an eternal punishment (because of the phrase "son of perdition" which is in the title is an eternal punishment)!!! But I do not know whether it is an eternal punishment or a temporary punishment. I will talk more about schools below.

My point is that mocking the Savior (who no one can deny existed), along with claiming that there is no God, is potentially a very, very serious sin. The "evolution debate" is not an entertaining side-show, it deals with very serious issues in the eyes of God which Christ Himself implied!!!

Getting back to evolution, the doctrines of the theory of evolution are satan's perfect doctrine because they do away with a belief in:
1) Heavenly Father,
2) Jesus Christ (in terms of His divinity, but they cannot deny that He existed),
3) The Holy Ghost,
4) Adam and Eve,
5) Noah and his wife
6) And all other prophets, ancient and modern

The theory of evolution is a mirror-image of the doctrines of The Church of Jesus Christ Of Latter-Day Saints (and to a large degree every other Christian church). Here is an article on that subject (this article has a chart which compares, side-by-side, the doctrines of the LDS church - and many other churches - versus the doctrines of the theory of evolution):
Article: LDS Doctrines Versus Evolution Doctrines, Some Of Which Are In Alma 30 In The Book Of Mormon

Another article which digs into these issues is the First Book article which identifies three different places in the Book of Mormon where the theory of evolution is predicted (but the word "evolution" could not be used in the Book of Mormon because the word did not exist in ancient times. Nor did the word exist when the Book of Mormon was first published in 1830 as far as I know):
Article: The First Book To Describe The Theory Of Evolution Was Not Written By Charles Darwin


What Does The Word "Evolution" Really Mean??

The atheists and evolutionists claim that all animals were created by "evolution," meaning every animal "evolved" from a prior, less sophisticated species. For example, they may say that humans "evolved" from bonobos or some other primate.

But there is a major problem with the theory of evolution. The word "evolution" does not represent a tangible object or a physical process that can create things!! Evolution is only a claim or belief that there is no God.

Theories and beliefs only exist inside of people's brains, they cannot create physical things, much less create physical things intelligently!!! Only tangible things can create other tangible things!!!

Let me repeat that: Only tangible things can create other tangible things!!! Get that through your head: Only tangible things can create other tangible things!!!

But "evolution" and imaginary processes are not tangible and they are not a force in nature such as gravity or wind or sunlight!!

See this webpage on the Types of Forces:
Physics Classroom: Types of Forces

Note that the word "evolution" does not appear on this page, nor should it!!!

In short, the word "evolution" is nothing more than a claim or belief that there is no God!! That's it!!! Evolution is not a physical object or a force that can do things, much less do things intelligently (such as sequence the nucleotides on any DNA strand)!!

Humans did not "evolve" from other primates any more than humans "evolved" from Donald Duck because both Donald Duck and "evolution" are imaginary things!!!

Evolution has no arms to create cells or DNA, it has no legs to travel, and above all evolution has no brain to design and intelligently sequence the nucleotides on any DNA strand and evolution cannot create the many different types of cells which are needed for the one million species of animals currently on this planet, all of which have both males and females whose DNA must align in an incredibly precise way!!!

  • Important Note: when I use the word "align" I do not mean that both DNA strands have the same sequence of nucleotides, I mean that the DNA strands (for a specific species) must align with each other at the function level (e.g. the section involved with creating the liver) - I will talk about this concept later).

How can I make the "evolution" debate any more clear!!!!!! Superman, the tooth fairy, the flying spaghetti monster, the theory of evolution , Mickey Mouse, Donald Duck, etc. are all exactly the same thing - a make-believe fantasy!!!

None of these fantasies can pick up a deck of cards, cook a dinner or design, create and sequence a single DNA strand!!!

In fact, every time you hear or see the word "evolution" substitute the word "evolution" with the word "Batman."

In summary, no animal species on this planet has ever evolved from another animal species because "evolution" is nothing more than a Superman comic book!!!

Let me say that again:

In summary, no animal species on this planet has ever evolved from another animal species because "evolution" is nothing more than a Superman comic book!!!


Accidents

So if there is no God, as claimed by the atheists/evolutionists, and if "evolution" has the same imaginary physical features as Superman, Batman and Robin, then what would be the force in nature that created human DNA and the DNA for all other species???

The atheists and evolutionists have no choice except to claim that the Universe, cells, DNA, etc. were all created by UNINTENTIONAL, DIRECTIONLESS, PURPOSELESS, MINDLESS ACCIDENTS!!!

However, the atheists and evolutionists will never use the term "accidents" because they know that no one would believe them if they used the word "accidents" instead of the imaginary word "evolution"!!!

"Accidents" have no brains!!! Well, neither does Batman or "evolution"!!!! But at least accidents exist.

Most of this website is designed to explain why "accidents" (though sometimes I use the term "evolution") could not have created a single DNA strand or a single cell on this planet!!!! When you hear or read the word "evolution" you should translate that word into the words: "mindless accidents."


The Big Bang

Let me change subjects for a moment and talk about the Big Bang.

The discovery of Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation, which resulted in two well-deserved Nobel Prizes, proved that the Big Bang really happened!! So the fact that there was a Big Bang is not in question!! The question is "how did the Big Bang happen"??

There are two issues. First, how did the object that exploded get created; and second, how did this incredibly dense object explode??

The object that exploded had to be dense beyond human comprehension because it had to be very small (perhaps the size of a beachball) and it had to be incredibly dense!! Can you imagine trying to cram all of the atoms in this Universe into an object the size of a beachball???

The second question is this: "how did this incredibly dense object explode"??? "Accidents" are not an option!!! It took a massive, massive, massive force to create and explode this incredibly dense object, no matter how big or small it was!!!

Only God, or someone He delegated the authority and power, could have created this incredibly dense object and then exploded it!!! Some people think it was Christ who actually did these things, or at least exploded it. That is a credible claim or theory because Christ is a God (i.e. He is in the Godhead); but the fact is it was either Heavenly Father or Christ or someone else appointed by Heavenly Father.

Most people don't know these things so the Big Bang will continue to be a controversial theory. Some people claim the Big Bang never happened, but the discovery of Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation, which many people do not know about, proved that it did happen!!!

For the purposes of this website, the key question is this: "could the creation of the object that exploded and the execution of the Big Bang explosion been an accident??? The answer is NOT A CHANCE!!!!

But there is even more, could an "accidental" Big Bang have created planets, stars, galaxies, clusters of galaxies, etc.?? Not a chance!!!

The Big Bang is a massive proof that God lives both because of the density of the object that exploded and the explosion itself!!!!!

God had to be the mastermind, but we don't know who actually created this object or exploded this object. As I mentioned, some think it was Christ. That is certainly a very credible claim or belief.

But my point is that the Big Bang could not have been an accident!!!! In fact, I consider the Big Bang to be a massive proof that God is alive and well and incredibly powerful.

And more importantly, the Big Bang proved the God existed before the Universe existed!!! That was a long time ago. Actually, our spirits also existed long before the Big Bang (spirits cannot be created or destroyed), but I won't get into that issue here.


The Theory of Evolution Battle In The Schools

Unfortunately, the imaginary, atheistic "theory of evolution" is taught in many schools, from middle school to college.

In fact, many, many young people today go to church on the weekends and they are told there is a God, but during the week in school they may be taught that the theory of evolution is true and there is no God.

Because of the teaching of the theory of evolution (i.e. the religion of atheism) in schools, many, many young people of all religions (starting in middle school in many cases) have lost their faith in God and have quit going to church, or if they are taken to church by their parents, they will go to church but they will not believe anything they hear!!!

That is the very goal and purpose of the theory of evolution - to convince people that there is no God.

Those who argue that the theory of evolution should be taught in schools may claim that all scientists are evolutionists. However, the theory of evolution is NOT universally accepted by all scientists!! While there are hundreds of books which have been written to push the theory of evolution; there are also hundreds of books which have been written against the theory of evolution!! Four of these books are free and are on this website.

Plus, in the scientific community, among those who have not written books, there are many scientists who are very much against the theory of evolution!!!

Those who believe that the scientific evidence strongly supports a belief in God are called "creation scientists." The term "intelligent design" is also used to describe "creation science."

The well-known and respected creation scientist Kent Hovind describes the atheists this way: "The atheists can't find God for the same reason a thief can't find a policeman."

That quote hits the nail on the head!!! The atheists/evolutionists don't want to find God because of pride!!! Pride is the underlying, undergirding, driving force of the theory of evolution, it is certainly not science!!!!

In fact, the theory of evolution is nothing but atheism in disguise. So any school which teaches evolution is teaching the religion of atheism in their school!!!

Later on this home page I will have a section called: Measuring The Damage Caused By The Theory of Evolution which talks about creationist Ken Ham's research on the damage done by the theory of evolution to the young people of his evangelical faith.

So let's get started with the scientific issues related to the theory of evolution debate!!!


Introduction To The Scientific Portion Of The Evolution Debate - Cell Biology

To begin the scientific issues of the evolution debate, suppose you and a friend were on a hike deep in the forest. You were proud to have traveled so far away from civilization!! Suddenly, as you came over a hill you saw, what looked like to you, a brand new Buick automobile with its engine running!!

Would you think that this Buick was created by an accidental explosion in the forest?? Of course not!! Would you think that a team of monkeys in the forest had created this Buick?? Of course not!! Would you think that this Buick was created by a team of fifth grade children in your local grade school who had snuck out of class one day?? Of course not!!

You would think that this Buick was created in a giant manufacturing plant in Michigan and/or in other states.

Was the giant assembly line where this Buick was assembled created by a gigantic explosion?? Of course not!!!

Guess what. Every cell in your body is far, far, far more sophisticated than any automobile or any automobile plant ever made by human beings!!!

Let me repeat that: Every cell in your body is far, far, far more sophisticated than any automobile or any automobile plant ever made by human beings!!!

Human beings are not even remotely capable of creating anything as sophisticated as a cell, much less a living cell!!!

Here is a quote from a book called "Evolution: A Theory In Crisis" by creationist (i.e. anti-evolutionist) Michael Denton:

  • "Darwin's Theory of Evolution is a theory in crisis in light of the tremendous advances we've made in molecular biology, biochemistry and genetics over the past fifty years. We now know that there are in fact tens of thousands of irreducibly complex systems on the cellular level. Specified complexity pervades the microscopic biological world. Although the tiniest bacterial cells are incredibly small, weighing less than 10-12 grams, each is in effect a veritable micro-miniaturized factory containing thousands of exquisitely designed pieces of intricate molecular machinery, made up altogether of one hundred thousand million atoms, far more complicated than any machinery built by man and absolutely without parallel in the non-living world."
    Michael Denton, "Evolution: A Theory in Crisis," 1986, p. 250.
    https://www.allaboutscience.org/darwins-theory-of-evolution.htm

An "irreducibly complex system" is, by definition, a sequence of complex chemical reactions, such that if any one of the chemical reactions was not there, or failed, the end result of the chemical reaction will fail and the entire cell may be at risk!!!

He is essentially saying that accidents could not have created any living cell!!! And he was talking about what is going on inside of every cell in your body!!! Yes, every cell in your body is far, far more sophisticated than any automobile ever made!!!

Even if every cell in your body were the size of a beachball, all of the scientists on this planet could not create a living cell!!!

Guess what, most of the cells in your body can divide into two cells, each with the above sophistication!!! Try dividing a new automobile into two new automobiles by one team of strong men pulling on the front bumper and another team of strong men pulling on the back bumper!!! Even if they were successful at pulling the car apart they would not end up with two cars, they would end up with two worthless halves of a single car!!

But not all cells divide. Be glad that brain cells do not divide or you would not be able to remember your name. That is another example of how sophisticated the human body is!!! Well, brain cells are more sophisticated than I am mentioning. Some brain cells do divide!!

Let's talk more about cell divisions starting with a fertilized egg.


Creating A Human Or Other Animal Via Cell Divisions

A new human baby starts out as a single fertilized egg and ends up, via cell divisions, with 37.2 trillion cells!!! This new baby has roughly 326 different kinds of cells some of which are transparent (or the baby could not see)!!! If your bone cells ended up in the pupils of your eyes you would be blind!!!

The location throughout your body of these 326 different types of cells is critical to your survival!!! So for 37.2 trillion cells the right type of cell (out of the 326 different types of cells) must end up in exactly the right location at the right time!!!

If you did the math, that is 12,127,200,000,000,000 decisions as to which type of cell ends up in which location of a human baby!!! And this number is not even a single drop of water in the oceans of trillions of Universes like ours as one of the numbers we will talk about when we get to the subject of permutations of nucleotides!!!

Accidents?? Not a chance!!! However God did it, He had to do it!!!

And these numbers are just for one species - humans!!! Humans are just one of ten million types of species which have existed, or currently exit, on this planet. And each species needed its own set of cell types!!!

This also means that if evolution were true, in many, many cases, during cell divisions, a single cell (a fertilized ovum), when it divides many, many times, will end up as two different kinds of cells!!! How does that happen??? This is also an issue of timing.

In addition, every type of cell in your body, and every type of cell which has ever existed is sophisticated beyond human comprehension!!!

Thousands of very, very smart scientists (and I mean really, really, really smart scientists) have a PhD degree in either Cell Biology or Microbiology or Genetics. Every cell in your body is vastly more sophisticated than any automobile or airplane ever made!!! PhDs in Cell Biology and Microbiology and Genetics and Genomics are still being given out to each new generation of scientists as more and more is learned about DNA and cells!!!

These scientists could write a website dozens of times bigger than this website containing thousands of reasons that Cell Biology and Microbiology, etc. by themselves, are a massive, massive proof that God is alive and well and WOW is God smart!!! This will become more and more obvious the more you study this website.

Well, no one would understand their article unless they had at least a B.S. in Cell Biology.

Let me give you another example. Sometimes you see drawings or pictures which seem to show an "evolution" of species from one species to another. But if you look at the DNA of these animals (which to some degree controls what each animal will look like), the theory of evolution falls apart because it is obvious that the DNA of one species could not have "evolved" into new and improved DNA for a new and improved species of animal!!! I talk a lot about this topic on this website!!

I don't have a clue as to how many different kinds of cells there are (or have been) for the one million living species of animals, the nine million extinct animal species, plants, insects and who knows what other kinds of living things there are, or have been, on this planet.

While there are many categories of reasons why the thory of evolution cannot be true: what is the #1 reason the theory of evolution cannot be true???
1) permutations of nucleotides for 40 million DNA strands just for animals or
2) the sophistication of all of the different kinds of cells on this planet???

In fact the permutations of nucleotides issue easily wins every battle for the #1 reason evolution cannot be true!!!

I will talk about what controls cell divisions in animals (including humans) in the Sixteen Cells Paradox article which is linked to below. Cell divisions are not controlled by what you think they are controlled by!!!


The Structure Of Enzymes

The structure of the DNA in enzymes is also an evidence of God's hands. See this image of the axis of Beta-DNA or B-DNA (it is an enzyme) produced by Dr. Francis Collins:
Image of Beta-DNA Double Helix (Right Image - Click Image to Magnify)

If you STUDY the right-hand image, you will know WHY, if the Beta-DNA of an enzyme is cut in half, like a rope, all of the scientists on this planet could not put the enzyme DNA strand back together. Nor could accidents (i.e. evolution)!!!!!

Not only does God live, He is intelligent far beyond our imaginations.


Introduction To The Mathematics Of Evolution

The atheists/evolutionists will always pretend that the imaginary and invisible evolution is massively more intelligent than human beings - and human beings do not understand all of the DNA for any living thing!!!

Regarding evolution, one of the giant facts which will be discussed when I talk about "permutations of nucleotides" (a "permutation," in this context, means a specific sequence of nucleotides on a DNA strand), is to emphasize that if the theory of evolution were true, there would literally be more dead animals on this planet (whose sequence of nucleotides on their DNA was not good enough to create a new viable animal from an old animal) than there are atoms in billions and billions of Universes!!! I talk about this elsewhere.

Permutations of nucleotides are incredibly powerful evidences against evolution as you will see!!!

As another example, human beings do not know how to sequence the nucleotides on the DNA strand for an ant (without cheating), much less how to sequence the nucleotides on the DNA for an extinct animal species for which scientists currently have little or no DNA!!! So how did "accidents" create and sequence the nucleotides for all living (and formerly living) animals???

It takes four new DNA strands to create a new species. There have been ten million species of animals on this planet, but only one million of them still exist!!!

Ponder this: if humans are not smart enough to sequence a single DNA strand, how did accidents create and sequence the 40 million unique types of DNA strands (just for animals) which have been, or currently are, on this planet???

How did the invisible and imaginary "evolution" create that many DNA strands with zero evidence of any failures (except perhaps in cases where the DNA had been damaged)!!!

My point is that there are potentially 40 million different types of supremely sophisticated DNA strands which did not get created by the imaginary evolution or the mindless accidents of evolution!!!

Scientists can create a DNA strand, and that is amazing - bravo - it is the sequencing of the nucleotides on the DNA that they will never will be able to do!! They will know why they will never be able to sequence all of a DNA strand for any dead/extinct or living animal when they understand the Sixteen Cells Paradox article which I will talk about below.

As that article will explain, DNA is not used in the way that scientists think it is used!! DNA is not a computer program (e.g. to control cell divisions), much of DNA is a database (which is used by the spirit of the new baby animal) which is why male and female DNA can align. It is much easier to align two databases (male DNA and female DNA) than to align two computer programs (to control cell divisions). But God can do either of these things but accidents cannot do either of these things.

Many scientists do not believe in God so they do not believe that humans (and all other living things) have spirits. So they will never, never, never be able to figure out how a single cell, followed by trillions or quadrillions of cell divisions, ends up as a baby animal!!! There are so many paradoxes with the theory that DNA controls all cell divisions that you would think they would give up.

Neither humans, nor Superman, nor Batman, nor evolution, nor accidents can sequence the nucleotides on a DNA strand so that this DNA strand can help create (via millions or billions or trillions or quadrillions of cell divisions) a new species or bring back to life an extinct species.

A mature Woolly Mammoth certainly had quadrillions of cells and they were not the largest animal to ever live on this planet!!! In fact, they are not even in the top 10 largest animals (some of the top 10 animals were water-dwelling animals). The largest land animal according to one source was probably Paraceratherium which was a lot bigger than a Woolly Mammoth, which is also considered to be a rhinoceros. Dinosaurs are reptiles.

See this ten minute YouTube video which does not even mention Paraceratherium (probably because it was considered a rhinoceros):
YouTube Video: TOP 10 BIGGEST DINOSAURS Ever !

But even if scientists could sequence the DNA for an extinct animal species, they could never bring that species back to life without God providing a spirit for that animal!!! The Sixteen Cells Paradox article, that I will link to below, proves that spirits are needed to create life, but spirits are also necessary to control cell divisions after the fertilization of an ovum!!!

Sometimes on this website I say that DNA is what controls cell divisions. This is "old technology" and is not correct; but I have not had time to "fix" all of the articles or chapters of books that say that DNA controls cell divisions. The Sixteen Cells Paradox proves that DNA cannot control the cell divisions for any animal.

Only God can create a spirit, though in some articles on LDS (i.e. LDS stands for "Latter-Day Saints" who are better known as "Mormons," who are Christians) websites there is some indication that spirits have existed forever, but I won't get into that issue here!!! The point is that spirits exist and we wouldn't be here if God did not exist!!!

In summary, just like the fact that the imaginary "evolution" cannot create a cell or a DNA strand, mindless accidents also cannot create a cell or a DNA strand!!!

So let's start talking about the heart and soul of the theory of evolution debate - can one species of animal "evolve" into a new and improved species of animal??

 


 

Can One Species (e.g. bonobos) "Evolve" Into A New And Improved Species (e.g. humans)??

The entire foundation of the theory of evolution is that one species can "evolve" into a new and improved species. What this means is that the DNA of one species can be changed (i.e. the sequence of nucleotides can be changed) into the DNA of a new and improved species by nothing but the brainless accidents of evolution.

Now we will start talking about some serious science and mathematics relative to the evolution debate.

We exist because God created Adam and Eve or we exist because of evolution. In other words, we descended from Adam and Eve or we are descended from some other primate, such as bonobos or apes or chimpanzees.

The example that I frequently use is the claim of the atheists/evolutionists that humans "evolved" from bonobos. While that claim may have been credible before the discovery of DNA, it certainly isn't credible after the discovery of DNA in 1953!!!

To claim that humans "evolved" from bonobo (as an example) is to claim that the DNA of a bonobo (actually four bonobo DNA strands) can randomly mutate into four vastly superior DNA strands to start the human species!!! I say "vastly superior" because human brains are vastly superior to bonobo brains even though bonobos can climb trees better than humans. I would rather have my brain.

  • (Note: this gets confusing because sometimes I talk about three different types of DNA for an existing species and at other times I talk about the fact that to create a new species from an old species requires four new and improved DNA strands - just hang in there I will explain these things as we go along).

There are both massive physical reasons and there are massive mathematical reasons why the DNA of a new species cannot be created by modifying the DNA of an old species by the mindless accidents of evolution.

Here is an article on the physical reasons that evolution cannot be true:
Article: Changing The Length Of A DNA Strand By Evolution/Accidents Is Impossible

Here is an article on the mathematical reasons that evolution cannot be true:
Article: Permutations - The Ultimate Death Of The Theory Of Evolution

I will mention both of these articles from time to time because these two articles represent the foundation of the evolution debate!!! The permutation issues will also lead to the concept of the question: "where are the failures of evolution?" This turns out to be a major issue!!!

Bar charts are a very good way to compare intelligence to no intelligence. Look at each bar chart in this chapter of one of the free eBooks on this website and then look carefully at the last bar chart to see a histogram of pure randomness/accidents (i.e. a histogram of what evolution would create every time!!!):
Book: Patterns of Intelligence - Chapter 18 - (Study All Bar Charts!!)

Yes, the flat bar chart is exactly what evolution / accidents would create every time. No living thing could exist with a flat bar chart. More is said about this issue in the two "Kehr's Paradox" articles.

In short, "evolution" has the intelligence of Superman and every DNA strand created by "imaginary evolution" or by accidents would have roughly an equal number of A, C, G and T nucleotides!!!

Drawings about the steps of how humans "evolved" from some other primate are beyond ludicrous!!! Today, the theory of evolution debate is not about visualizations and creative thinking, it is about where new DNA comes from!!

If "evolution" existed, it would require that the DNA of one species be "accidentally" modified into the DNA of a new and improved species!!! This would typically require many millions of changes to the DNA of the original species in order to create a new and improved species from an existing species (e.g. the modification of bonobo DNA into human DNA)!!! The human brain alone would require millions of changes to each of four bonobo DNA strands!!! And when done the four new human DNA strands must align with each other at the function level!!!

By "function level" (as an example) I mean the section of DNA on the two male types of DNA strands, which are involved with the creation of the liver for a specific species, must be in the same location as the section of DNA on the two female DNA strands which are involved with the creation of the liver for the new species.


Sperm Cells and Ova

Just for terminology, an "ovum" is a single egg in a female. "Ova" is plural for ovum.

Before going on I need to say something about sperm cells and ova so you will understand what I am going to talk about below. Let's look at the sperm cells and ova of humans:
1) The males of the human species have the sperm cells. There are two different kinds of sperm cells because it is the sperm cell that gets to the ovum first that will determine the "sex" of the baby (i.e. male or female). Here are the two kinds of sperm cells in every male animal:
a) male sperm cells (in the male) which will create a male baby (if one of these sperm cells gets to an ovum first), and
b) female sperm cells (in the male) which will create a female baby (if one of these sperm cells gets to an ovum first).

The female has one or more ova (i.e. eggs) which are gender-neutral. It is the sperm cell (male sperm cell or female sperm cell) from the male, which gets to the ovum first, that will determine the sex of the baby!!

There is literally a swimming race of sperm cells to get to the ovum first!!! The first one there wins and fertilizes the ovum.

However, in order for humans to have "evolved" from bonobo (or pick any primate you want to pick), MILLIONS of random, mindless changes would have been needed to convert EACH OF FOUR DNA STRANDS OF THE BONOBO (two male bonobo DNA strands and two female bonobo DNA strands must be changed) into FOUR VASTLY SUPERIOR DNA STRANDS FOR HUMANS and all of this must happen in the same latitude, longitude and timeframe or else the new male and female humans (who have the new human DNA) would not be able to mate in order to start the human race!!!

And when the four new and improved human DNA strands are built, these four new and improved DNA strands must align with each other at the function level (e.g. the section of DNA which is involved with the creation of the liver [or more technically the database fields involved with the creation of the liver] must be in the same place on all four DNA strands when creating a new species)!!!

Note: remember that I said that it takes four new DNA strands to create a new species from an existing species [if evolution were true]. But once this new species is up and running it only takes three types of DNA strands to perpetuate the species because an ovum can be used for either a male sperm cell or a female sperm cell. This is true of all animal species!!

So it is somewhat like comparing apples (four new DNA strands to create a new species) to oranges (three types of DNA strands to maintain an existing species).

So the issues include mathematical issues (i.e. having the sequence of nucleotides on four DNA strands be changed to create a new and improved species) and physical issues (i.e. physically changing the DNA of one species into the DNA of another species) and latitude, longitude and timeframe issues. And other issues.

Now I should also add that all of these changes cannot happen in one generation. In fact, if evolution were true it might take thousands of generations to make all of the necessary changes by mindless evolution!!! Needless, to say, the coordination of these four DNA strands, over thousands of generations (as required by evolution) is just one of many massively, massively, massively powerful reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true!!!

Getting back to bonobos, how could one or two bonobo mothers have a total of two human children who in turn can have human children of their own!!!

As mentioned above, to create a new species from an old species (humans from bonobo as an example), requires four bonobo DNA strands to "evolve" into four new and improved human DNA strands!!! This is important to clearly understand, so let's go into more detail on this issue because this is a very critical issue.


The Four New DNA Strands Which Are Needed To Create A New Species

Here are the four bonobo DNA strands I am talking about which must evolve into four new and improved human DNA strands so that the human race can begin (the minimum two new human male sperm cells and the minimum two new human female ova must be completed in the same generation so the bonobo mother can give birth to two human children who can grow up and have their own human children)!!!

1) Millions of mindless changes to a DNA strand in at least one bonobo male sperm cell in a male bonobo to create a human male sperm cell,

2) Millions of mindless changes to a DNA strand in at least one bonobo female sperm cell in a male bonobo to create a human female sperm cell,

3) Millions of mindless changes to a DNA strand in a gender-neutral ovum in a female bonobo (for the first male sperm cell [to create a male human] to fertilize),

4) Millions of mindless changes to a DNA strand in a second gender-neutral ovum in a female bonobo (for the second male sperm cell [to create a female human] to fertilize).

And these four new human DNA strands (two from male bonobo DNA and two from female bonobo DNA) must align with each other at the function level!!!

Also note that bonobos, like all mammals, would have many sperm cells involved in this swimming race to the ovum, most of which are bonobo sperm cells which have not been modified by evolution so the two new human sperm cells must win the swimming race!!! This is just another gigantic bump in the road for the theory of evolution.

There are also latitude, longitude and timeframe issues as I already mentioned. For example, if the first male human DNA was created by evolution one-thousand years before the first female human DNA was created by evolution, and/or the two bonobo mothers were 5,000 miles apart, you would not be reading this sentence if evolution were true!!!

Well, one or two bonobo fathers and one or two bonobo mothers could be involved, but this is an academic issue because the statistics of any of this happening are so bad.

Plus, the bonobo parents (of the first human male and female babies) must not kill or abandon their human babies because human babies are really funny-looking to bonobos (i.e. they do not look like their beautiful bonobo children)!!!

The probability that millions of mindless, random, accidental changes to each of four bonobo DNA strands and that these random changes would create four vastly superior human DNA strands for the human race, and these changes must realistically be spread out over many generations (and the DNA must align in each generation or disasters would occur - which in itself is a major proof that evolution cannot be true) is both physically and mathematically and common sense absurd!!!

And a new human couple (in some generation of the new species of humans) must eventually start having more than two human children so that the new human race can begin to grow in numbers!!!

Yet, the "evolution" of the DNA of the bonobo sperm cells and ova into human sperm cells and ova is precisely the foundation of the theory of evolution after the discovery of DNA in 1953!!!

And there have been ten million animal species which have lived on this planet, all of which would have to go through the same process that creating humans from bonobos would have to go through if evolution were true!!! That is forty-million new and highly sophisticated DNA strands created by the mindless accidents of evolution without any significant evidence of failures in this process!!!

By the way, only one million of these ten million species still exist.

If evolution were true, the Cambrian Explosion cannot be explained because evolution cannot create a new species with four new DNA strands which must align with each other (at the function level of course), much less create many new species in a short amount of time (which is the characteristic feature of the Cambrian Explosion, meaning the word "explosion" means a relatively short amount of time)!!!

And if the theory of evolution were true, a really good genealogist could trace our ancestry (species to species) back to the "first living cell". Well, they are probably busy enough that they don't need that assignment. In addition, monkeys don't keep very good genealogy records.

We can summarize the theory of evolution debate thusly: how can four DNA strands of one species be both physically and intelligently changed into four DNA strands for a new and improved species BY SOMETHING THAT DOESN'T EVEN EXIST (I.E. "EVOLUTION")???!!!

And quite frankly, accidents aren't much smarter than Superman, but at least accidents can do tangible things!!

About this time any statistician would declare a winner in the evolution debate: God!! But there is much more to talk about in more detail. Fasten your seatbelt!!!


A KEY ARTICLE: The Sixteen Cells Paradox

Some time ago I was simulating in my head the cell divisions after an ovum was fertilized. When I got to the new human baby having sixteen cells something struck me: if the DNA in all sixteen of these cells were identical to the DNA in the fertilized egg (which obviously would be the case) and if DNA were the only thing controlling the cell divisions then each of these sixteen cells would lead to a head, 2 arms, 2 legs, etc. for the new baby!!! The new baby would have sixteen heads, 32 arms, 32 legs, etc.

In other words, if the DNA in the original ovum would lead to a human baby, then each of the identical DNA strands, when the new baby consists of sixteen cells, would also lead to a human baby and the end result would be a single baby who has the features of sixteen human babies (if DNA were solely controlling the cell divisions)!!!

Something was missing from the assumption that DNA is solely controlling the cell divisions!!!

In reality, a human being starts out as a single fertilized egg and via many trillions of cell divisions, a human baby is born nine-months later with one head, two arms, two legs, etc!!!

The math simply doesn't make any sense!!!

The Sixteen Cells Paradox article PROVES THAT DNA CANNOT BE THE MAIN THING THAT IS CONTROLLING THE CELL DIVISIONS!!!! And this article explains WHAT IS CONTROLLING THESE CELL DIVISIONS!!!!
Article: The Sixteen Cells Paradox!! [Read the entire article before going on!!!]

Does this mean that spirits have cells??? I don't know, but spirits must be made of something.

The "Sixteen Cells Paradox" applies to all animals (male and female), not just humans. So all animals have a spirit!! This should not surprise anyone because all living things require a spirit for life!!! So it is efficient for Heavenly Father to create the spirit (though sometimes you read in LDS literature that spirits are not created, they have existed forever) so that the spirit can both create life and control the cell divisions. And spirits come from God!!!

This can explain why the DNA of male sperm cells and female sperm cells can align with each other - because DNA is a database of information, not a computer program to control cell divisions!!!!

So the length of the DNA strand is largely, if not entirely, dependent on the size of the database on the DNA!! This is why the above DNA strands can align with each other, because the database "fields" can align.

And this also destroys the theory of evolution because each species will have its own unique spirit and thus its own unique database. So if two animal species have the same size DNA, it has little or nothing to do with the complexity and sophistication of the species.

To dig deeper, the spirit controls the cell divisions and the size of the DNA will be largely (if not entirely) dependent on the size of the database, meaning the size of the individual database elements (e.g. "fields") on the DNA strand!!

The largest DNA strand on this planet, and it is much, much larger than human DNA, is for a fish, protopterus aethiopicus, which has 133 billion nucleotide pairs on its DNA!!! Why a fish has such a gigantic database I do not know. Maybe this type of fish has an unusually high number of different types of cells - I don't know.

Let me briefly talk about "life." Scientists have tried to create life from non-life. They will NEVER be successful unless God cooperates and provides a spirit. I do not know if each bacteria has its own spirit or whether there is some general spirit for single-celled living things.

I talk more about "What Is Life?" in a section later on.

Humans, and all other species, exist because of God!!! Yes, science has confirmed that the Biblical account of Adam and Eve IS TRUE!!! Your genealogy chart has Noah and his wife (some Bible scholars think her name was Naamah) on it and Adam and his wife Eve on it!!!

In other words, Adam and Eve are on mine and your geneology chart, not some bonobo couple!!!

Try saying that in some college biology class!!! I would do it, but then I am an ex-Marine and Viet Nam veteran so everyone would be polite to an old man who went to war and got blown up while on patrol.


The Two-Male DNA Alignment Issue - This Section Will Absolutely Blow Your Mind!!!!

After reading this section you will know that God is very much alive and well.

Let us look at the two types of male DNA strands in the sperm cells for any animal species. One creates a male baby and one creates a female baby. Both of them must align with the female DNA strand in her ovum. But if each of them aligns with the female DNA strand in the ovum (at the function level of course), this implies that the two types of male DNA must align with each other (at the function level, not the nucleotide level), yet one will lead to a male baby and one will lead to a female baby!!!!

There is no specific reason that the two male DNA strands need to align with each other at the function level except for the fact that BOTH OF THEM must align with a female DNA strand at the function level!!

Here is the amazing thing: two male DNA strands must align with each other (at the function level but not at the nucleotide level), yet one of them will create a male baby and one of them will create a female baby!!! This is incomprehensible!!! Yet this fact applies to roughly 1,000,000 animal species which are currently on this planet and 9,000,000 extinct species of animals!!!

I want to show this somewhat graphically to emphasize my point. There are three kinds of DNA strands, for every existing species, which must align with each other at the function level:
1) In the male, male DNA in the male sperm cells to create a male baby,
2) In the male, female DNA in the female sperm cells to create a female baby,
3) In the female, gender-neutral DNA in the female ovum.

All three of these kinds of DNA are very, very different yet they must align with each other at the function level!!

Now let us ignore the third item in the above list and show the list again:
1) In the male, male DNA in the male sperm cells to create a male baby,
2) In the male, female DNA in the female sperm cells to create a female baby.

What this means is that the two types of DNA in the male, one of which creates a male baby and one of which creates a female baby, must align with each other at the function level because both of them must align with the gender-neutral DNA in the female ovum at the function level!!!!

Yet one of these DNA strands will lead to a male baby and the other DNA strand will lead to a female baby!!!

This is absolutely unbelievable!!! Yet, if DNA is looked at as a database, it makes perfect sense!!! Two databases are much easier to align than the object code of two computer programs!!!

But note that this concept applies to one million living animal species and nine million extinct animal species!!!! Two male DNA strands must align with each other at the function level, yet one will create a male baby and the other will create a female baby!!! NO WAY!!!!! But God has done this for ten million animal species, one million of which are alive today!!! And I am sure that is precisely why God designed DNA to be a database!!!

OK, well no one believes that this is a major reason evolution cannot be true (even though my first college degree was in mathematics), so here is a homework assignment tonight for human scientists. For some extinct species for which they only have (or a living species if the sequence of nucleotides in the male sperm cells, to create a female baby, is withheld from the scientists):
1) In the male, male DNA in the male sperm cells,
3) In the female, gender-neutral DNA in the female ovum.

The task of scientists (or accidents if you believe in evolution) is to design, sequence and create, without cheating:
2) In the male, create female DNA for the female sperm cells which must align with the male DNA for the male sperm cells at the function level, and it must align with the DNA in the ovum of the female at the function level!!!

Good luck!!! I was born in 1946 so I am not going to live long enough for that to happen!!! Nor will my great-grandchildren live long enough (I don't have any yet, but I soon will)!!!

I can assure you, given this assignment, that scientists would be delighted to learn that DNA is a database!!!

In fact, scientists are NOT EVEN CLOSE to decoding the entire DNA strand of any species of plants, animals or insects!!! I don't think that knowing that DNA is a database (instead of a computer program) would help them very much.

God is a tough act to follow!!!

Now let's talk about one of the major, major articles on this website - the dreaded subject of permutations. Permutations of nucleotides are probably the #1 reason the theory of evolution cannot be true. By the time you finish the next section (and related articles) your eyes will bulge out and you will be talking to yourself!!!


Permutations Of Nucleotides On DNA And Related Issues

As mentioned above an in other places a "permutation" is a unique way to order or sequence a set of objects, in this case a way to order or sequence the nucleotides on a DNA strand. Hopefully you have already read the article on permutations. If not, please read it now. This section will take that article a step further.

As a baseline there are about 4500 atoms in this Universe!!! That is a very big number. However, the number of possible permutations (i.e. a "unique permutation" or just "permutation") of a human DNA strand (a human DNA strand has 3,200,000,000 nucleotides - meaning A, C, G, T), both male and female (male DNA in male sperm cells of the male and female DNA in female sperm cells of the male and the DNA in the ovum of the female which must align with both of the male DNA strands at the function level), is 43,200,000,000!! This number dwarfs the number of atoms in many, many billions of billions of Universes!!!

In other words, a person could uniquely sequence the nucleotides of a human DNA strand, with 3,200,000,000 nucleotides, in 43,200,000,000 unique ways!!

That would take a long time to do!!!

Remember, it takes four new DNA strands to create a new species, such as humans. And each of the four DNA strands needs very specialized DNA, and for humans each sequence of nucleotides on their DNA must come from among 43,200,000,000 permutations of nucleotides!!

Here is the key point: the vast, vast, vast, (literally insert the word "vast" one trillion more times) percent of these permutations would NOT create a viable human being or any other animal species. Yet four DNA strands (each with the same length) are needed to create every new animal species (and likely every new insect species) on this planet!!!

But the key is that evolution is totally stupid and does everything randomly (well, actually evolution doesn't exist so I am using the term "evolution" instead of "accidents" to keep things simple). If you put together four totally random sequences of nucleotides, to simulate evolution, the probability that they would be good enough to create a human baby is far, far, far less that the probability of randomly picking a single correct atom from among a billion billion billion Universes the size of our Universe!!!!!!!!!

If evolution were true, and the DNA for all species (not just humans) had been sequenced by accidents, there would literally be more worthless DNA strands (which did not have a viable permutation of nucleotides) laying on the ground on this planet, than there are atoms in a trillion, trillion, trillion, ... Universes!!

Well, we can look at this another way. This is more interesting. If evolution were true, there would not be enough atoms in a trillion, trillion, trillion, ..., Universes to create four viable DNA strands which would be needed to create all of the species on this planet (current and extinct) via nothing but accidents - this is because there would be so many failures in the attempt to do this you would run out of atoms in all of these Universes before all of the species on just this planet were created!!!

Mathematics is really not very user-friendly to the theory of evolution. I am just getting warmed up, trust me. You will wish my first college degree was in psychology.

So where are the countless failures of unusable DNA strands created by nothing but invalid permutations?? There are none!!! Yes, occasionally there is a mutation to a DNA strand, but these are very rare compared to the massive, massive number of worthless DNA strands that evolution would create!!! And in science in general, accidents never make something more sophisticated!!!

Every cell that has DNA inside of it takes very, very, very good care of their DNA!!! That is one of many reasons that cells are so sophisticated.

But also remember that four DNA strands, which must align with each other at the function level, are needed to create EACH OF THE 10 million animal species which have lived on this planet or currently live on this planet!!!

That is 40,000,000 (i.e. 40 million) DNA strands (needed to create 10,000,000 animal species) that scientists do not understand just for animals!!! If the average animal DNA strand was 200,000,000 nucleotides long, that is 8,000,000,000,000,000 nucleotides!!!

Here is where it gets worse for evolution: this much DNA would have 48,000,000,000,000,000 permutations!!! You are probably laughing so hard you will have to pick yourself up off the floor.

This mathematical proof assumes that there are no spirits to direct the morphing of the embryo and that a DNA sequence solely controls this morphing of the embryo (which is precisely what "evolution" would claim).

Which is bigger, the 4500 atoms in this Universe or the 48,000,000,000,000,000 permutations of nucleotides for all animal species which have or do exist on this planet!!! That is 4 to the eight quadrillion power!!!

Permutations of nucleotides on DNA account for many of the massive, massive reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true and is probably the #1 reason evolution cannot be true!!! Remember, sequencing of nucleotides is one of the things that humans cannot do!!! Scientists can create DNA, but they cannot sequence it!!!

Here again is my article on "Permutations" if you didn't read it the first time:
Article: Permutations - The Ultimate Death Of The Theory Of Evolution

Use your mental calculator and do the math:
ZERO species have been created by superman, batman or the equally imaginary: evolution
ZERO species have been created by blind, deaf and dumb accidents
ZERO PLUS ZERO EQUALS ZERO (i.e. there should be zero life on this planet!!!)

Now we have a new one: PERMUTATIONS are the death of the theory of evolution!!!

The "bottom line" is that imaginary evolution plus mindless accidents plus mindless permutations collectively have an I.Q. of ZERO!! Humans should not exist!!!

GOD WINS!!!


 

The Physical Constants

Now let's talk about some serious science that will blow your mind!!! This is definitely something that Superman did not do!!!! I am sure that the people at M.I.T., and other schools, would agree. These guys and girls are smart!!

This section will talk about the physical constants in our Universe. The atheists and evolutionists are very well aware that this is a MAJOR, MAJOR PROBLEM for the theory of evolution!!

The reason this is such a problem is because the probabilities that the pure accidents of the theory of evolution could have created the correct SET of physical constants for our Universe to exist, by pure accident, are so bad that sometimes the atheists and evolutionists claim there have been an infinite number of Universes and our Universe just happened to have the right set of physical constants in physics in order to create a viable Universe and none of the other Universes did have the correct set of physical constants so those other Universes failed to form into galaxies, clusters of galaxies, etc. and no longer exist!!!

There probably are an infinite number of Universes, but rest assured that if there are, every one of them was created by God (or by someone He delegated the authority and power) and every one of them has the correct set of physical constants and every Universe has life on many of its planets!!!

Without physical constants there would not be a Universe for us to live on!!! Well, without the force that creates the physical constants, which almost certainly is Tesla's aether there would not be a Universe for us to live on. A pure vacuum certainly could not create these physical constants!!!

I should note that Tesla, the greatest scientific genius of all time (among scientists) is blacklisted in physics books and journals because of all of the corrupt "scientists" who hate Tesla and love Einstein because Tesla was a heck of a lot smarter than Einstein!!! But perhaps more importantly Tesla could create free energy, which the money-powers did not appreciate.

Many years ago I worked at Sprint (the telecommunications company) and I designed an experiment to determine whether aether existed. As a fiber-optic company we wanted to know the nature of light and if aether existed.

The experiment proved that aether does exist (though today I could design an even better experiment) and that photons do not exist. I notified five physics journals what we had done at Sprint. All five physics journals told me not to even submit my paper because they were not going to read it!!! That gives you an idea of how much physicists love Einstein and hate Tesla!!! Or maybe I should say that that gives you an idea of how much scientists love popularity and how much they hate truth!!!

By the way, many scientists think that "Higgs boson" is nothing more than aether. Because aether and Tesla are forbidden words in physics, scientists quickly accepted a substitute - Higgs boson!!! And Higgs won a Nobel Prize for doing something that I did more than 50 years ago!!! But I made the mistake of using the word "aether." And I also used the word "Tesla," which was probably worse.

In any case, slowly page all the way down to the very bottom of this very important article from M.I.T. (these guys and girls are smart):
M.I.T. Website: Fundamental Physical Constants

Do you really think that Superman or the "flying spaghetti monster" flew around the Universe and created the physical constants in physics???

It gets better.

Here is an amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing YouTube video which does not mention anywhere near as many items as the M.I.T. document, but it is REQUIRED WATCHING!!! In six minutes he quotes several famous scientists and mathematically shows the amazing accuracy that some of the physical constants must have. He also talks about the "Multiverse" and flatly rejects this option as a "cop out" (my words):
YouTube video: The Fundamental Constants And Quantities Of The Universe Have Been Carefully Dialed

This guy hits the nail on the head!!!

What he says is an absolute proof that God is alive and well and that God had to exist BEFORE our Universe came to exist!!! So we now have two reasons that God had to exist before our Universe existed - the Big Bang and the physical constants.

Of course, the atheists and evolutionists have to come up with something so they can claim that there is no God. That is the "Multiverse" that he explained. We don't know how many Universes there are, but every one of them has the correct set of physical constants!!!

I typed the word "multiverse" into Google and got 13,300,000 hits. The atheists really, really, really don't like God!!!!!

Many scientists will do anything to avoid mentioning God!!!


More On Cell Biology And Microbiology

"Cell Biology" is essentially the study of the cells that exist in animals and plants. "Microbiology" is the study of single-celled organisms (i.e. microorganisms). Every cell is vastly more sophisticated than anything ever made by humans as I have already mentioned!!!

In Darwin's day it was possible to believe in the theory of evolution because scientists in his day knew nothing about DNA (DNA was discovered in 1953) and they knew nothing about the physical constants and they knew almost nothing about cells. But today, with what is known about DNA, the physical constants and cells, the theory of evolution is complete and absolute nonsense!!

Remember the quote I mentioned above about the complexity of cells. Michael Denton did not say there was one such sequence of chemical chain reactions in cells, but "tens of thousands" of such sequences!!!

You should see the size of my cell biology books!!! One of my Cell Biology books (Essential Cell Biology, third edition) has 9 authors and has a glossary with more than 900 terms!!!

Here is the title of a section in Chapter 18: Unattached Chromosomes Block Sister-Chromatid Separation. How would you like to take a test on that subject??!!

I wish I was smart enough to understand that book. This book is for third-year Cell Biology students!!! So is The World Of The Cell book.

I have a granddaughter in college who is studying Microbiology. She must be a lot smarter than I am.

Here is a 13 minute YouTube video which deals with the probability of creating a single protein by pure chance:
YouTube: Origin Of Life - the probability of making a protein

Here is a 10 minute YouTube video which talks about the same subject!!! This is an even more amazing YouTube Video:
YouTube: Origin: Probability of a Single Protein Forming by Chance

Here is an entire article on Cell Biology (you could call it an introduction to an introduction [60 more times] to Cell Biology and Microbiology). The good news is that it links to some really cool YouTube videos:
Article: Cell Biology And Microbiology

This is a string which you can put into Google that is another resource for information about cell biology, but in this case I think most or all of it is free:
"Khan Academy" "cell biology"

There are many, many, many types of cells which could not have been created by the mindless accidents of evolution!!!

Someday I hope to find a Cell Biologist or Microbiologist who will write a few articles on why cell biology (or even microbiology) is a proof that the theory of evolution is false. These people are smart!!! You would know that if you ever tried to read a graduate school textbook in cell biology or microbiology!!!! The problem is that no one would understand their articles!!!

More on cell biology from time to time.


Latter-Day Saint Section (And Anyone Else)

What started out as a large section of links to Latter-Day Saint articles (e.g. Mormon articles) on this home page has now turned into its own article to keep this home page from getting way too long.

This article has many links to general conference talks, etc. etc. This article is required reading for Latter-Day Saints but even for non-Mormons there is a lot of information relative to the Bible!!

Here are just three of the many links to other articles which are mentioned in this article:
1) The King Follett Discourse of the prophet Joseph Smith
2) The Grand Council article (YOU WERE THERE AS A SPIRIT BEFORE ADAM AND EVE WERE PUT ON THIS EARTH!!!)
3) The The First Book article (which mentions three places in the Book of Mormon where the theory of evolution is mentioned)
and many other LDS relevant articles.

So here is the article, LDS Section, which will open in a new page:
Additional Section For Latter-Day Saints (i.e. Mormons) And The General Public

The LDS Scholar article is someone similar but it does have some additional comments. It also has a test question for LDS scholars and every one of them will have the wrong answer to this test question:
The LDS Scholar Article


Non-Denominational, Free Bible Videos By the Latter-Day Saint Church

There is a spectacular set of short non-denominational YouTube videos on the life of Christ made by the LDS church (i.e. the "Mormon" church or officially "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints"), which are free and online!!! Anyone of any Christian religion will love them as they are totally non-denominational and purely out of the Bible without any added comments:
Short Videos On The Life Of Christ - VERY SPECTACULAR FOR ANY CHRISTIAN!!!!!


Measuring The Damage Caused By The Theory of Evolution Being Taught In Schools

While the theory of evolution versus creation science debate is heated, the debate is far more than academic because many students are victims of this battle!! As a result of the teaching of evolution in many schools, countless middle school, high school and college students have lost their belief in God or they may question their belief in God.

Remember, any school which teaches the theory of evolution is teaching the religion of atheism!!! In other words: schools are TEACHING RELIGION!!!

Fortunately, the damage done by evolution can be measured. Studies funded by the very well known evangelical creationist Ken Ham organization have shown that most of the loss of testimony of God occurs in middle school and high school, not in college!! Ken Ham's conclusion, based on statistics, is that many students are already gone by the time they get to college!! Remember those two words for a minute.

But of course, those who still have a testimony of God when they enter college will have that testimony challenged in college depending on what courses they take and what university they attend.

I should also note that the evangelicals do not have the Pearl of Great Price scriptures of the Mormon church. Many things in the early chapters of Genesis (written by Moses) were damaged (i.e. poor translations, lost documents, injected bias, etc.) over the many centuries between when the early chapters of Genesis were originally written and today. The Pearl of Great Price exists largely to "fix" the damage done to the early chapters of Genesis.

As one example, the early chapters in Genesis are frequently interpreted to mean that the entire Universe (or our Galaxy) was created in six literal days. That is one reason that the Pearl of Great Price exists.
Pearl Of Great Price

So I do not fault the evangelicals for some of their statements, they are good people.

Here is a link to the Ken Ham video: "Already Gone - Part 1" (22 minutes):
YouTube Video: Already Gone - Part 1

If you were not automatically taken to Part 2 - here is "Already Gone - Part 2" (20 minutes):
YouTube Video: Already Gone - Part 2

In these two videos he has some brilliant comments about Noah's Ark!!! He makes it clear that Noah's Ark was plenty big enough to save every species that God wanted to save (and even too big). I sometimes wonder whether the flood was designed to kill-off some of the 9 million now-extinct species along with many very wicked humans. As we would say: "God killed two birds with one stone - the flood"!!

Thee is also a book called "Alredy Gone" which is sold on the www.AnswersInGenesis.com website:
To Purchase the Book: Aleady Gone


Natural Selection

"Natural selection" is the claim that stronger species survive and weaker species may not survive. Natural selection is perfectly true.

However, "natural selection" is frequently used as "evidence" for the theory of evolution.

However, I should note that "natural selection" has never created a new species!!! And natural selection never makes a species stronger!!

Natural selection can only eliminate weak species WHICH ALREADY EXIST which are killed via environment, starvation or they are killed by other species.

Natural selection is only effective when two or more species already exist!!! In other words, natural selection is purely an elimination process that eliminates weak species!! Natural selection is not a creation process!!! In other words, natural selection reduces the number of species on a planet, it never increases the number of species on a planet!!!

Let me say that last part again: natural selection reduces the number of species on a planet!!!

Remember, there are nine million extinct animal species which have lived on this planet. Some may have gone extinct because of weather changes, others may have gone extinct because some other species killed them off or because their food supply was cut-off or because of Noah's flood.

Sometimes the atheists and evolutionists use the validity of natural selection as "evidence" for the theory of evolution. But natural selection is NOT evidence for evolution because it is only an elimination process!!!

For example, you may hear the phrase: "evolution by natural selection." I just did a Google search on that phrase and got 819,00 hits!!! How can that many people be so easily deceived!!! Well, because they hear it from others and repeat it because it sounds cool. It is what they want to hear.

Natural Selection is perfectly true, but it is purely an elimination process!!! The phrase "evolution by natural selection" is nothing but an oxymoron after the discovery of DNA!!

Remember, the only thing that natural selection does is eliminate weak species!!! The claim that natural selection is "evidence" for evolution" is paradoxical!!

NATURAL SELECTION WORKS AGAINST EVOLUTION. Evolution is "trying" to create new and improved species (which it has never done) and natural selection is trying to eliminate existing species (which it does all the time)!!!

Let me repeat that:

NATURAL SELECTION WORKS AGAINST EVOLUTION. Evolution is "trying" to create new and improved species (which it has never done) and natural selection is trying to eliminate existing species (which it does all the time)!!!

Natural selection will easily win that battle because natural selection does not have to deal with the statistics of creating and sequencing new DNA.

A problem with natural selection is that because DNA cannot be created and sequenced by evolution, there should be no species of animals on this planet so natural selection should have nothing to do because there should not be any species to "select" from!! But given that God has created millions of species of animals, natural selection is a perfectly valid scientific concept!!!

Remember, while natural selection is a valid concept, IT IS ONLY AN ELIMINATION PROCESS.

Some people might claim that natural selection increases the overall quality of species on this planet by eliminating the weak species. That is true, but do not infer from this that natural selection can create a single new species!!!

This article will go into great detail about why Natural Selection has absolutely nothing to do with evolution:
Article: Does "Natural Selection" Have Anything To Do With The Theory of Evolution?


Important Notes Before Going On To The Next Major Section Of This Home Page

You are more than half way done with the home page but there are a few things I need to mention.

Note #1: When I realize that I have made a mistake (e.g. for a long time I thought that DNA is what solely controlled cell divisions) it can take a year or more before I get around to updating and fixing all of the articles that have this mistake!!! So you will be seeing articles or chapters of books on this website which mention that DNA controls cell divisions for many months to come!!!

Note #2: Don't Forget: please, please, please tell your friends about this website, such as via social media or email or by putting a link to this website on your website. There is no other website on the Internet even close to this website on the subject of why the theory of evolution cannot be true!!!

I know how many hits I get every day and I can tell by the "hit patterns" that a couple of times someone on social media has spread the word!!! Wonderful - Thanks!!!

G.o.o.g,l,e is a piece of garbage from the perspective of those who have websites. G.o,o.g,l.e has no clue which websites are bad, which websites are good and which websites are subject-matter expert websites!! While I do get a few hits from G.o.o.g,l,e, I can assure you they are very, very rare given the size of this website. So it is up to YOU to spread the word on social media, emails, etc!!!

Note #3: The original purpose of this website was to host a free eBook. Well, now there are four free eBooks on this website. Here is a link to these books when you get around to them:
Article: Quick Links To Four Anti-Evolution Books [And One Article] by R. Webster Kehr

The Quick Links article just mentioned also includes a link to an article which lists more than 400 reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true. It is an old article but I suspect the vast majority of it still contains accurate reasons evolution cannot be true.

Let the third section of this home page begin.


 

More On The Sophistication Of Human DNA

A human DNA strand is seven feet long, but it is coiled up to fit inside of a cell that cannot be seen with the naked eye!!! This DNA strand is combined with, and used by, the spirit of the new baby. The new baby is made of roughly 37.2 trillion cells which includes 60,000 miles of blood vessels, etc. I do not know why spirits would have blood vessels, but maybe they do?? Or maybe that is one of those DNA things the spirit doesn't deal with.

The 60,000 miles of blood vessels in this newborn baby would wrap around the earth at the equator twice, with 10,000 miles of blood vessels left over!!

Ponder that for a moment!!!

When the baby is born he or she will have an incredible brain which is connected to a massive nervous system, a skull to protect the brain, a spine to protect the spinal cord (which is a cylindrical bundle of nerve fibers), two eyes which are connected to the nervous system which can see in 3-D, a beating heart, a liver, a pancreas, 300 bones (which eventually fuse into 206 bones), etc. etc.!!

The DNA in a sperm cell of the father of the baby contributes part of the DNA for the new baby and the DNA in the mother's ovum (egg) contributes part of the DNA for the new baby. The DNA strands include databases from the mother and father which must align with each other at the function level and are accessed by the spirit of the new baby!!!

But it is even more complicated than that. Men actually have two types of DNA strands: the DNA in the "male sperm cells" which will lead to a male baby and the DNA in the "female sperm cells" which will lead to a female baby. The DNA in the mother's egg/ovum is gender-neutral.

So if a male sperm cell penetrates the mother's egg first (along with its DNA), a male baby will result. If a female sperm cell penetrates the mother's egg first (along with its DNA), a female baby will result. The sex of the baby is literally a swimming race of sperm cells to penetrate the ovum first!!


Comparing DNA To Computer Programs (To The Extent That DNA Controls Cell Divisions)

The process of writing real computer programs can teach us a lot about the process of evolution which has supposedly written new and improved DNA millions of times (to create new and improved species). In other words, if computer programmers wrote computer programs the way that evolution must sequence DNA strands (using nothing but mindless accidents), there would be no functional computer programs on this planet!!!
What Computer Programming Can Teach Us About Evolution

But of course evolution has the added burden (which computer programmers do not have) of aligning the DNA of four DNA computer programs (i.e. four DNA strands) with each other when creating a new species from an old species. The father's two new DNA strands (when creating a new species) and the mothers two new DNA strands (ditto) must align with each other at the function level, and these four DNA strands must be exactly the same length in each section!!!

I would like to see four computer programmers who are given the same assignment to independently write four massively complex computer programs. Each program must create a binary string (i.e. a complied computer program). When done the four binary strings of the four computer programs, written independently by four different computer programmers, must align with each other (at the function level) meaning all four of the binary programs must be exactly the same length for each functional section (e.g. subroutine) and overall!!!

Then they should try to write these four new computer programs by using nothing but four different random number generators (to simulate "evolution")!!!

Yet for every species of animals all four DNA strands must align with each other at the function level meaning they must be the same length at both the relative location and the functional level!!!

While DNA is primarily a database that does not make the problems with evolution any easier.

For example, suppose evolution/accidents tries to create four new male and female human DNA strands from four male and female bonobo DNA strands. Remember, this requires four new and improved human DNA strands.

Suppose the first human male DNA strand was fine, but what if the DNA created by evolution for the second human male DNA strand only had 99% of the length of the DNA for the first male sperm cell??

And what if the first female DNA strand for the first human ovum was only 97% as long as the DNA for the first bonobo ovum??

And what if the second female DNA strand for the second human ovum was only 95% as long as the DNA for the second bonobo ovum??

We wouldn't be here if evolution were true!!!

Let us define a "field" to be a very specific segment of DNA which creates a very specific enzyme or has some other very specific function needed by the cell.

A human DNA strand would require many more "fields" than a bonobo DNA strand would need, such as in the creation of the human brain.

This means that in the conversion of bonobo DNA into human DNA there are many more "fields" of DNA strands (not just individual nucleotides). Each "chunk" must be the same length even though we are talking about two very different species!!!

The probability that four randomly created human DNA strands (randomly created by the pure accidents of evolution by modifying bonobo DNA), after millions of changes to their original bonobo DNA, would be the same length as each other and that all four DNA strands would align at the function and field levels is total nonsense!!

This certainly would not be the case when the human brain was created from a bonobo brain.

My point is that the four human DNA strands created by evolution WOULD NOT EVEN HAVE THE SAME LENGTH!!! In other words, if four bonobo DNA strands "evolved" into four human DNA strands, the "fields" would not be the same "fields" and the "fields" would not be in the same location and in the same order (because everything was done randomly) and the lengths of the four new human DNA strands would not be the same length which alone guarantees that the "fields" would not align with each other!!!

Let me quote from another website (the coloring is mine):

  • Chimpanzees now have to share the distinction of being our closest living relative in the animal kingdom. An international team of researchers has sequenced the genome of the bonobo for the first time, confirming that it shares the same percentage of its DNA with us as chimps do. The team also found some small but tantalizing differences in the genomes of the three species—differences that may explain how bonobos and chimpanzees don't look or act like us even though we share about 99% of our DNA.
    https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2012/06/bonobos-join-chimps-closest-human-relatives

The fact that there is a massive difference in intelligence between human intelligence and bonobo intelligence, yet our DNA difference is not that great, is a massive proof that humans and bonobos have spirits and the difference is our intelligence has to do with out spirits, not our databases!!!

As always, scientists base their conclusions on the assumption that DNA is everything. Many of them don't believe in God and thus they do not believe that all living things have spirits.

In addition, DNA is "irreducibly complex," meaning every section and sequence has to work the first time!!! Evolution cannot rewrite a section of DNA that was not quite right the first time and then insert it into the DNA where it belongs (after cutting out the bad section)!!!

THE REQUIREMENT THAT THESE VASTLY DIFFERENT DNA STRANDS MUST ALIGN WITH EACH OTHER AT THE FUNCTION AND FIELD LEVELS IS ONE OF THE MASSIVE, MASSIVE REASONS THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION CANNOT BE TRUE!!!!

And always be asking the key question: where are the failures of evolution??? If evolution were true, there would be more defective, worthless DNA strands on this planet that there are atoms in the Universe!!

Anyone with a functional knowledge of permutations and statistics would immediately know that God is alive and well!!! Yes, God is smart!!! The good news is that because our spirits are His "children" He is on our side and He loves us and He actually wants us to succeed!!! Rest assured of that!!!


Common Ancestors

The concept of "common ancestor" is totally based on the belief that evolution is true and DNA can be changed!!! For example, it is thought by many that humans have a "common ancestor" with chimpanzees (AKA: "Chimpanzee - Human Last Common Ancestor" or CHLCA) because some segments of DNA of chimpanzees and humans are very similar.

Well, our DNA does have something in common with chimpanzee DNA.

We have a common designer!!! Computer programmers reuse subroutines all the time!!! When God designed the DNA for humans and chimpanzees He may have used some sections of DNA more than once. God is efficient. I don't know whether He designed humans first or chimpanzees first. This method is common, for example, with those who design automobiles as they would occasionally use common parts from an old model car in the new model car. This saves money for the automobile manufacturer.

Or there could be other reasons that God (or some of His children He assigned the task) used "common parts" on DNA.

The point is that the fact that DNA cannot be changed (to create a new species from an old species) is VERY IMPORTANT when thinking about the claims of the atheists and evolutionists. This is just an example of how the atheists and evolutionists assume evolution is true without thinking about the issues.


A Little More About Cells

I wasn't kidding when I said that a team of cell biologists could create a website several times larger than this website just talking about cells!!!

Thousands of scientists have PhD degrees in "Cell Biology" or Microbiology!! Cells are not simple!! So how could a PhD in Cell Biology or Microbiology think for one instant that cells, and what goes on inside of cells, were created purely by accidents!!!

Here is an article with videos about the sophistication of cells - very interesting stuff (this has some YouTube videos):
Article: This Article Has Links To YouTube Videos Regarding The Sophistication Of Cells

Here is the bottom line: the scientific evidence is overwhelming that accidents have not created a single cell or a single DNA strand!! Nor have accidents intelligently sequenced the nucleotides on any DNA strand!! The entire foundation of the theory of evolution is scientific nonsense!! Here is my article on Cell Biology and Microbiology, which I linked to above:
Article: Cell Biology and Microbiology

Trust me: God is alive and well and He is a heck of a lot smarter than any of us!! And because we are His children (at the spirit level) we have a lot more potential that we can conceive now!!!

 


 

The Magnitude Of The Problems With The Theory Of Evolution

The biggest problem I have with maintaining this website is keeping track of all of the reasons that evolution cannot be true. It is literally humanly impossible to constantly be changing articles every time I come up with another reason evolution cannot be true.

The above items are just a few of the hundreds of scientific reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true which are discussed on this website.

But I should emphasize that the MAGNITUDE of the reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true is simply beyond comprehension. The permutation issues of the DNA for several million species, all of which have both males and females, alone would eliminate any chance that the theory of evolution is true. And where are the failures of randomness??? And the construction of cells and DNA are other issues of such magnitude that the theory of evolution simply cannot be true.

Do not look at each reason the theory of evolution cannot be true as being equal with the other reasons. Some reasons are massive enough, by themselves to make the theory of evolution completely ludicrous!!!

Now I want to make it very clear that many students have been fooled by the atheists and evolutionists. This is nothing to be ashamed of!!! The atheists and evolutionists have perfected the art of deception, they are well-organized, very well-funded and their deceptions are highly polished!!!

Atheists don't want a God to exist because a God would be massively smarter than they are. So most of them do everything in their vivid imaginations to pretend there is no God and to claim that everything in the Universe came to exist by pure chance. God is replaced by mindless accidents.

Of course, some teachers are required to teach the theory of evolution.

Here is an article with more than 400 reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true which I link to from time to time:
Welcome To More Than 400 Reasons Evolution Cannot Be True

Here is an article which will grow in numbers (e.g. numbers of reasons evolution cannot be true) as I get time:
Unlimited Reasons Evolution Cannot Be True

I literally have stacks of spiral notebooks with notes on why the theory of evolution cannot be true. I hope I live long enough to go through all of them.


What A Student Should Not Do!!

So what should a student do when they realize the theory of evolution is complete scientific nonsense?? It is definitely not advisable for a student to argue with their teacher, but there is nothing wrong with a student quietly going "online" and learning the truth about the absurdity of the theory of evolution because of the sophistication of DNA and the sophistication of the cells that the DNA resides inside of, among many other reasons (e.g. the physical constants and the Universe).

Just quietly, and low key, spread the word among your friends. Definitely mention this website if a teacher gets involved. Have your teacher email me if they have any questions or comments (my email address is at the bottom of this home page). I will be happy to answer his or her questions and I would appreciate their comments if they think I say something wrong. I am human after all so I might be wrong on some issues. In fact, I have made changes in this website based on user comments.


Evolution After The "First Living Cell" (A Major Section!!!)

If evolution were true, life on this earth did not begin with the Woolly Mammoth!!!! Life had to start with a single cell if evolution were true. So let us first talk about the credibility of the "first living cell" theory as claimed by the atheists and evolutionists:
Article: First Living Cell

Evolutionists claim that the DNA of the first human male and the DNA of the first human female "evolved" independently over millions of years, from the same "first living cell," by a series of accidents called "evolution"!!!

But to do this each new male and new female of a new species had to "evolve" in the same latitude, longitude and timeframe!!! This just adds to the headaches of evolution!!!

We know that human DNA is 3,200,000,000 nucleotides long. Let us assume that the length of the "first living cell" was 10,000 nucleotides long. At an average increase in length of 15,000 nucleotides for each new species, there would be 213,333 species between the "first living cell" and human DNA!!! This is an insane claim of the atheists/evolutionists considering all of the problems with creating a single new species from an existing species!!!

And remember, when animals started to "evolve" four new and improved DNA strands would be needed for each new animal species!!!

And at some point male DNA and female DNA had to "evolve" independently from there on (i.e. as soon as the first species with a "male" and "female" existed). And remember it takes four new and improved DNA strands to create a new and improved animal species!!

How did the DNA of the first human father and the DNA of the first human mother "evolve" together from the "first living cell?" How were the 4 DNA strands synchronized, for each species after slightly improved species, as the DNA of the males and females evolved independently for millions of years??

And don't forget the latitude, longitude and timeframe issues!!! And where are the failures???

And to compliment what I said above: suppose the male DNA evolved slightly faster (say 1% faster) than the female DNA evolved (or vice versa). Within many thousands of years of new species, their DNA would not align and they would not have been able to have any children that survived because their DNA was not compatible!! That species would be the end of evolution for that line.

So four DNA strands, starting with the first animal, must evolve together for species after species in the same latitude, longitude and timeframe, until humans existed!!!

I don't think the atheists and evolutionists are very good at mathematics.

Male DNA and female DNA had to be designed by God, for each species with a male and female!! Evolution could never have designed two massively sophisticated computer programs/databases (DNA) that could be integrated together to create a third computer program (a baby who has features of both parents). And evolution certainly could not have done it in the same timeframe and same locations on the earth.

You will never see the above few paragraphs in a science book or biology book at the high school or college level!!! No textbook author is ever going to ask me for permission to use information from my website!!! They don't have to ask - DO IT!!!

The evolution debate today is not about science, it is about God. If you assume God does not exist, or if you believe God does not exist, you will likely believe in the theory of evolution no matter how absurd it is. And you will use your vivid imagination to fill in the gaps where the theory of evolution has massive problems.

Unfortunately, many people who believed in God have been tricked into believing in evolution. In fact, that is the precise purpose of the highly sophisticated deceptions of the atheists and evolutionists (and I have only talked about a few of their deceptions on this home page) and why it is taught in most schools, but not all schools.

In some private schools, owned by a religious group, "creation science" or "intelligent design" is taught and in other schools there are disclaimers about evolution.

PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO WHAT I AM ABOUT TO SAY:

Here is an interesting idea that school administrators should consider: HOW ABOUT TEACHING SCIENTIFIC FACTS INSTEAD OF TEACHING SCIENCE FICTION!!!!!! Wow, what a novel idea - who would have thought about teaching good science instead of scientific fantasies in the classrooms??

I doubt that anyone in any school has ever thought about that!!! Let me repeat that because I am serious about this issue:

Here is an interesting idea that school administrators should consider: HOW ABOUT TEACHING SCIENTIFIC FACTS INSTEAD OF TEACHING SCIENCE FICTION!!!!!! Wow, what a novel idea - who would have thought about teaching good science instead of scientific fantasies in the classrooms??

Biology is no longer about science, it is about creative thinking as to how every discovery in science can be attributed to the theory of evolution (i.e. "without God") in order to get more converts to atheism. Atheists are not interested in truth, they are only interested in getting converts to atheism.

One of the key deceptions of the atheists and evolutionists, to get converts, is their definition of the term "species." They define the term "species" in such a way that each "variety" of dog is a different "species." To them a Chihuahua and a Great Dane are different "species." This gives them the latitude to claim that they have observed a new "species" form by evolution and that evolution is therefore true!!!

But if the term "unique species" is defined to be a "unique DNA structure" (as it should be) then they have never seen a new "species" be created!!!! Nor will they ever see a new species be created by accidents or by the human breeding of animals or by humans.

If someone assumed that humans were the smartest animal on this planet, as we are, then certainly no other species (e.g. bonobos) could ever have had the intelligence to design new DNA for a new species.

In fact, scientists themselves cannot create a new species if a person uses the correct definition of "species."

So I guess that "evolution" is the smartest animal on this planet because:
1) humans cannot design new DNA for a new species, but
2) the atheists and evolutionist claim that accidents/evolution can design and create new DNA for a new species!!!

So that makes accidents massively smarter than humans!!! The atheists and evolutionists don't like to talk about DNA, they like to tell stories and use deceptions, such as by using very clever deceptive definitions.

Seven chapters in one of the free eBooks on this website are devoted to deceptive definitions!!!

In addition, the atheists must claim the entire Universe was created by accident!! How could the atheists and evolutionists claim that the entire Universe was created by accident instead of by God? Well, they had to come up with some "accident" that they claimed could create the Universe, including the superclusters of clusters of galaxies. So the atheists invented the concept of a purely accidental "Big Bang.".

Yes there was a Big Bang but the object that exploded had to contain all of the atoms in the Universe!!! Only God could have pulled that off!!! Yes, the Big Bang really did happen, that is not the issue. The issue is how did the object that exploded get created and how did this incredibly dense object explode??

Would you give a U.S. Army unit a large box of shotputs and tell them that if they crush them in battle that the shotputs would explode just like hand grenades???

There is NO LAW IN PHYSICS that says the more dense a solid object is, the easier it is to explode!! Well, the most incredibly dense object that ever existed had to spontaneously explode for the Big Bang to be an accident!!! I don't think so!!! Someone lit the fuse and then ran like hell!!! What sidewalk would they be running away on???

Nope, no one ran away, either God did it or someone He authorized to do it did it.

By the way, you cannot believe how many galaxies there are in the Universe. Astronomers at a major school noticed a dark spot in the Universe where there were no galaxies. So they hit on the idea to focus a huge telescope (or one in space, I don't remember which) to focus on that one dark spot for an extended length of time. Guess what: they found thousands of galaxies in that dark spot!!!

As astronomers put bigger and bigger telescopes in space they will see more and more galaxies. That is a truth that will never end!!!


Cell Biology Books, Some Written By Creation Scientists

I would love to have a staff of people dig through all of the pro-evolution and anti-evolution books which have been printed. I am sure I would learn many, many things from the anti-evolution books.

There are many science books which are pro-evolution. Here are two of them:

I own a giant textbook on Cell Biology which is called: The World Of The Cell, Fourth Edition, by Becker, Kleinsmith and Hardin. This textbook is 845 pages. The term "species" does not show up in the Index!!!

I also own a book called The Dictionary of Cell and Molecular Biology by J.M. Lackie. It is 725 pages and the print is small.

While these books are pro-evolution, they are good for something. They clearly prove that there are thousands of reasons the theory of accidents cannot be true due to the sophistication of cells; and this does not include the many issues created purely by the DNA in almost all cells!!

I also own two books which were written by "creation scientists" [yes, people who openly admit that they believe in God also write books] and I am sure there are many other creation science books on this topic:
Signature In The Cell - DNA and the Evidence For Intelligent Design by Stephen C. Meyer
The Cell's Design - How Chemistry Reveals The Creator's Artistry by Fazale Rana

These two men obviously believe that God had to create the many species on this earth because they could not have been created by accidents.

Every microorganism on this planet is far more sophisticated than any jet airplane on this planet!!! It is not even close!!!


What is Life? (A Very Important Section)

Let us look at the issue: "what is life?" For example, if you took a fish and left it out of the water until it died, and then an hour after it died you put it back into the water, why doesn't it come back to life? All of the raw elements for life (including all of the DNA and cells) are still functional and still in the fish, so why doesn't it come back to life? There is something more to "life" than just cells and oxygen and water. That would be a spirit!!! When the spirit leaves, there is no way to bring an animal back to life unless God allows the spirit to return (after it had left).

Furthermore, have the evolutionists and atheists ever proven that life can be created from non-life (i.e. inorganic materials)?? Never, never, never - yet they continue to preach atheism.

While several attempts have been made to create life from non-life (e.g. Miller-Uray, Wong and Hartgerink), the scientists have not only failed to create life, they have also failed to prove it can be done!!

For example, have scientists put a large shell over a pond, which had no life, meaning there was no DNA and no cells (this simulates "prebiotic" conditions, meaning "existing before life"), and observed "life" form by a series of accidents, including RNA or DNA inside of a "first living cell" (in that pond), that was alive and had the ability to divide itself into two cells (which would be required for complex life to survive and evolve)? Never!!

Even the "first living cell" had to divide into two cells (etc.) for life to perpetuate!!! How could something that simple divide?? The "warm pond" thing has no credibility. I don't think the temperature of the water can overcome the statistical problems with the theory of evolution!!!

Then what is their evidence for evolution? Their only evidence is that many scientists are very arrogant and they do not believe in God and thus they have no choice except to use their God-given brains to deceive people into believing that everything in the Universe, including human DNA, occurred by chance.

But the theory of evolution should have been thrown in the trash can when DNA was discovered and when the complexity of cells was also discovered. Yet, as scientists learn more and more about DNA and cells, the atheists continue to cling to the theory of evolution as if it were still 1859, when Darwin's first book was published.

Every new discovery leads to a new fairy tale to tell.

The only thing that is "evolving" on this planet is the theory of evolution as evolutionists/atheists constantly need to develop new spin to account for the new discoveries about the sophistication of cells, the morphing of the embryo algorithms on DNA, etc.


Can Accidents Or Simplicity Create Complexity?

As one example of complexity, the human eyes are unbelievable in complexity. Yet the sections on human DNA which create the human eyes must be far more complex than the eyes themselves (this is assuming there are no spirits)!! And the intelligence who designed the DNA (God) must be far more complex than the DNA itself!!

In other words, simplicity never creates complexity. Intelligence is top-down, not bottom-up!!!

Let me repeat that, simplicity never creates complexity. Intelligence is top-down, not bottom-up!!! To understand these concepts, consider these items:

First, consider that a human-designed computer program exists because of the human intelligence to write the computer program, the human intelligence to write the computer language, the human intelligence to write the computer language compiler, the human intelligence to design and build the microprocessor, including designing and building the memory chips, etc.

Second, consider the output of the computer program which is printed on a piece of paper.

How can the printout on the piece of paper be more sophisticated than the human intelligence needed to write the computer program, to write the computer language, etc.?? It can't!!

Let's think about the memory chips. I have a son who retired from working for a company that makes memory chips. At times he would be sitting in a very, very large room, by himself, with more than a billion dollar's worth of equipment needed to make memory chips!!

The memory chips cannot be more complex than the machines that made them, and the machines that made them cannot be more complex than the humans who designed them!!

Simplicity cannot create complexity!!

There is no functional, useful machine on this planet that was not designed and built by human beings!!

Let me repeat that:

There is no functional, useful machine on this planet that was not designed and built by human beings!!

So why do the atheists and evolutionists claim that all of the many different kinds of cells (for all animal species), every one of which is far more sophisticated than any human-built machine, were created and sequenced by accidents!!!

Consider the sophistication of DNA such that it creates a person's brain. Let us think about a pianist.

A pianist must be able to convert thousands on dots on a sheet of music into the movements of their fingers!! To do this the DNA must create the nerves between their eyes and their brain, then the brain must process these dots and then the brain must send signals to the fingers of the pianist. And the DNA must create the muscles on their fingers, etc.

If all of this is in place, and with thousands of hours of practice, spread over many years, a pianist can play the Rachmaninoff Piano Concerto #3!! Here is a YouTube video of Anna Fedorova playing the Rachmaninoff Piano Concerto #3:
Rachmaninoff: Piano Concerto No. 3 - Anna Fedorova

Try to teach a bonobo to play this piece of music!!!

Many years ago I had a friend who, if you put sheet music in front of him that he had never seen before he could play this music immediately.

If you put such a piece of sheet music in front of me, I wouldn't have the slightest clue how to play that piece of music!!! And most people would not do any better than I would.

Many people have incredible talents that the average person does not have. How could evolution have created these special "gifts" (i.e. "talents") that only a very, very small number of humans have??

What created our DNA, which in turn created our brain, had to be far, far smarter than our DNA and our brain!!!

That would be God. Much of what we can do comes from our spirit and God merged our spirits with our bodies. Somewhere in this process "talents" were created, which probably come mostly from our spirits.

Accidents (i.e. evolution) have zero intelligence so how could accidents create something with intelligence? They can't!! Intelligence is a top-down process and someone a lot smarter than humans had to design human DNA and the DNA for every one of the several million species of animals on this planet which have or do exist, all of which have a male and female.

Which is more intelligent: accidents or monkeys?? Think about that. Obviously monkeys. and the limit of monkey intelligence is far higher than the limit of accidents!!! But monkeys cannot design and create the DNA for an extinct species!!!

Could accidents or monkeys design and build a Buick automobile? Of course not. It takes a lot of intelligence, including many different specialties, to build a Buick automobile. Only humans can build an automobile. Likewise, only God could have sequenced the DNA and created the cells for several million species of plants, animals and insects.


Article: Where Did God Come From??

The truth is that God had to exist long before our Universe was created and our sun was created and this planet was prepared for earth life. So people naturally want to know where God came from!!

Brigham Young, who was born in 1801 (Darwin was born in 1809), the second prophet of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (the Mormons), said this about the first cause of all things (i.e. where God came from):

  • Many have tried to penetrate to the First Cause of all things; but it would be as easy for an ant to number the grains of sand on the earth. It is not for man, with his limited intelligence, to grasp eternity in his comprehension ... It would be as easy for a gnat to trace the history of man back to his origin as for man to fathom the First Cause of all things, lift the veil of eternity, and reveal the mysteries that have been sought after by philosophers from the beginning.

And Brigham Young said this long before the discovery of other galaxies and the sophistication of DNA and cells were discovered!!

In other words, there was a "First Cause" of all things - a beginning - but this beginning happened so long ago, and so many quadrillions of things have happened since then, that these events are far, far beyond human comprehension.

By the way, the largest desert on this planet is 5.5 MILLION SQUARE MILES in size (the Antarctica Polar Desert)!! The Arctic Polar Desert is 5.4 MILLION SQUARE MILES in size!! And there are many other deserts.

There are a lot of grains of sand on this planet for the ant to count!!

If Brigham Young had known these two facts, and other facts about deserts, I doubt he would have changed his statement!!

  • "I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use."
    Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)

While Brigham Young did not know anything about DNA and he knew very little about the Universe in his day, he did understand the principle that the "first cause of all things" is beyond human comprehension.

Brigham Young also said this about God:

  • He is the Supreme Controller of the universe. At his rebuke the sea is dried up, and the rivers become a wilderness. He measures the waters in the hollow of his hand, and meteth out heaven with a span, and comprehendeth the dust of the earth in a measure, and weigheth the mountains in scales, and the hills in a balance; the nations to him are as a drop in a bucket, and he taketh up the isles as a very little thing; the hairs of our heads are numbered by him, and not a sparrow falleth to the ground without our Father; and he knoweth every thought and intent of the hearts of all living, for he is everywhere present by the power of his Spirit -- his minister, the Holy Ghost.

This article is specifically about where God and the Universe came from:
Article: Where Did God And The Universe Come From?

Here is an article on astronomy:
Article: Astronomy


A Summary and Overview Of Some Key Issues

So far we have barely touched the surface of the reasons evolution cannot be true, yet even at this point we have no logical choice except to conclude that God exists. Different religions may have different beliefs about God, but there is no choice except to say that God does exist. In the Mormon religion (the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints) there are three separate Gods in the Godhead. The head God (Heavenly Father), the Savior (Jesus Christ) and the Holy Ghost.

If scientists are so smart, and believe that God does not exist, can they create a Universe with a planet like Earth that has (though most are extinct) several million animal species which have both males and females?

In fact, let's make it easy. Suppose a team of scientists are taken to a completely barren planet with no life on it. I will allow the planet to have an atmosphere and water. But there is no life on this planet, not even a bacteria.

And I will allow the scientists to take anything with them that they want, as long as it is not alive.

Can these scientists create life from non life?? Can they create species which are extinct on this planet (e.g. Woolly Mammoth), and so on??

The answer is 'no'!!! Scientists cannot do that even on this planet and they have dead Woolly Mammoths to look at and study!! How much of their DNA they can put together I do not know, but I know they have some DNA from Woolly Mammoths.

The evolution debate is not about where bones came from, it is about where DNA came from!!! In other words, when you see fossils, think about the DNA that created these animals!! How did the "morphing of the embryo" algorithms come to exist for many, many complex species, especially when there is a male and female in the species?

It is scary to think that Woolly Mammoths have spirits that certainly exist in the "spirit world"!!! By the way, the "spirit world" is on this planet, we just cannot see spirits (but they can see us). My wife is in the spirit world. There are a heck of a lot more spirits on this planet (for animals and humans) than there are people and animals that we can see!!!

For those who have loved ones in the spirit world (and we all do), here is an incredibly scholarly article on the spirit world which is on the BYU website which was written by Brent L. Top:
Article On BYU Website: What Is This Thing That Men Call Death? Latter-day Saint Teachings About the Spirit World

The only thing I would add to what he says is that there are temptations in the spirit world and a person could theoretically drop from the Celestial Kingdom (at the time of their death) to the Telestial Kingdom because of the things a person does in the spirit world (e.g. the spirit world version of adultery, which would more accurately be called "violating chastity"). Murder cannot be committed in the spirit world because spirits cannot die.

It is far beyond the scope of this home page to talk about many subjects. But trust me: the probability of a viable permutation of nucleotides, to create both a male and female for a single advanced species (the permutation of nucleotides on the DNA would have to be almost perfect in order to perform the morphing of the embryo for both a male and female offspring, even if DNA is primarily a database) is insanely improbable.

The issue of permutations of nucleotides is the real death of the theory of evolution!!!!! This is not an issue that can be "explained away" with fancy storytelling and vivid imaginations!!! It is pure mathematics!!!!

The statistical problems created by permutations of nucleotides make the theory of evolution look very, very bad!!!

Here is an interesting question: which came first the cell or the DNA inside that cell?? If the DNA came first, how did a cell get created and then the DNA get put inside of this cell without damaging the cell?? If the cell came first, there is nothing inside of a cell that can create a DNA strand or even modify it.

In summary, here are just a few of the key reasons that evolution (i.e. accidents) could never have created human beings:

1) Obtaining a viable permutation of nucleotides on DNA, that could create a human baby, is statistically impossible. It would be far more likely to pick a single atom which is hidden among many, many quadrillions of Universes. This is NOT an exaggeration!!

2) Creating DNA from scratch (e.g. for the "first living cell") is impossible for many reasons (however, humans can do this),

3) Creating a cell from scratch, by accident, is impossible for many reasons - the inside of a cell is like a small city - (humans cannot do this),

4) Creating life from non-life is impossible and has never been done (though it has been attempted),

5) Creating the mechanisms in the cell, which use the DNA as patterns to create proteins, is impossible to happen by accident. For example, how does this mechanism know WHERE on the DNA a specific protein code is located and how does it FIND THAT SECTION?? If scientists know the answers to these two questions, how can they claim that these mechanisms came to exist by accident?? Only 1% of DNA is coded for proteins (the WHERE ARE THE KEY SECTIONS OF DNA issue is a topic by itself),

6) Creating the mechanisms inside the cell to constantly protect and check the DNA,

7) And so on.

Just ask any computer programmer how long it would take to write a complex computer program using code written exclusively by random number generators. It would never happen!!

So if humans cannot design and create from scratch DNA or RNA (well they can do that, but they cannot sequence it), plus a cell for the DNA or RNA to exist inside, and give their new cell "life," with a new spirit and a viable permutation of nucleotides to provide information for the spirit, why would anyone believe that a series of pure accidents (i.e. evolution) could have created the "first living cell" in a sterile pond?

In order for evolution to be true: accidents would have to be many thousands of times smarter than humans!!!!!!!

Let me repeat that: In order for evolution to be true: accidents would have to be many thousands of times smarter than humans!!!!!!!

Yet many teachers and professors claim that evolution has done trillions and trillions of things that scientists cannot do!!!

Many reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true are mentioned in various other articles on this website, such as the "Twenty-Five Reasons The Theory of Evolution Cannot Be True" article.

And don't forget the article which lists many articles on this website, most of which are not mentioned on this home page:
Some Of The Key Articles On This Website


The Evolution Debate

While there are more than 350 books which are favorable to the theory of evolution there are also many books which are strongly critical of the theory of evolution!!

There are also many YouTube videos on both sides of the debate.

Those who are critical of the theory of evolution are called "creation scientists" or "creationists" or "intelligent design" people because they believe that scientific data favors a "Creator" of the Universe.

In fact, if you want to get published in a leading biology journal you better be an atheist and your article better support the theory of evolution. If it does not praise Darwin and evolution your article will end up in the trash can, not in a "science" journal!!! They will not even read your paper!! They love popularity and they are afraid they will get converted into believing in God.

From the incomprehensible sophistication of DNA, to the amazing complexity of cells, to the earth we live on, to the ends of the Milky Way Galaxy, to the furthest galaxy cluster and supercluster (by the way, the supercluster we live in is called the Laniakea Supercluster), and considering the "constants" in physics (e.g. the gravitational constant); the credibility of the theory of evolution has dropped to ABSOLUTE ZERO!!!

By the way, there are about 100,000,000,000 GALAXIES!!! This number will go up and up as bigger and bigger telescopes are put into space.


Other Anti-Evolution Books

If you listen to the propaganda of the pro-evolution monopoly you might think that anyone who believes in creation science is a dolt. Nothing could be further from the truth. There are many "creation scientists" (i.e. those who believe God created this Universe) who are brilliant and have no problems seeing through the false science generated by the scientific establishment.

In fact, many anti-evolution books have been written by brilliant scientists. This listing of anti-evolution books and DVDs contains only a small sampling of the anti-evolution books which exist in print. In fact, there are more than 200 anti-evolution books.

Many of the books were written by PhDs in the sciences. The arguments in these books totally shred the theory of evolution from a scientific standpoint.

Some of these books may be out of print and you may have to use a book finder, such as Alibris, to find them.

Here is a link to this appendix (some of these 30 or so books may push a specific religious denomination):
Appendix: Books and Movies Against the Theory of Evolution

If you know of any book or CD that needs to be added, let me know.

If you have read this far: pat yourself on the back!!!!! Good job, now go and tell many others!!!!!

 


 

About The Author Of The ProphetsOrEvolution.com Website (A Retired Cancer Researcher)

As mentioned above, herbalists and homeopaths were curing cancer for more than 100 years before the discovery of DNA!!! Today there are many experts in natural cancer treatments!!!

This is an article on this website which links to six other articles on cancer on this website and these articles also talk about other health conditions, such as adult erectile dysfunction (which is easy to cure but does take some time) and these articles link to other articles on the very famous www.CancerTutor.com website which is the main website where the experts who work with cancer patients (one-on-one) can be contacted.
The Truth About Cancer That You Will Never Hear In The Media!!!

By the way, if you are over 45 and you want to prevent ever getting cancer (unless you already have cancer and don't know it), take two Protandim pills a day. It comes from LifeVantage. Do not tell them you want Protandim to prevent cancer!!! They are deathly afraid of the absolutely corrupt FDA and will assume you are an undercover FDA agent if you mention cancer.

Just order the product as an anti-oxidant and they will be happy to find someone near you who can sell it to you!!! Well, what you say is true, it is an anti-oxidant and Protandim is good for you, but just don't say anything about cancer.

You also might be able to get Protandim from Amazon so you don't have to talk to anyone.

Protandim can also be used as a cancer treatment (along with the other things that the www.CancerTutor.com people tell you take). The Cancer Tutor people are not allowed to mention Protandim because the people at LifeVantage are afraid of the FDA. For advanced cancer patients ADD 12 Protandim pills a day, 2 at a time every 2 hours, to whatever the Cancer Tutor people tell you to use!!!

Personally I use unsweetened purple grape juice to prevent cancer, but then again I am not afraid of cancer. Purple grape juice has at least a dozen chemicals in it that kill cancer cells. So that is another option to prevent cancer.

This link is to an article on a different website which has a key article on Alzheimer's Disease which I wrote:
Introduction To The Treatment For Alzheimer's Disease (Amazing YouTube Video Included)

Here is the long version of my biography (which talks more about how I got into evolution research):
Biography Of R. Webster Kehr

If you want to know more about the Mormon church (which is a Christian church) (i.e. The Church Of Jesus Christ Of Latter Day Saints) please see this website which is owned by the church:
Mormon Website For Non-Members

Here is my email address, which is camouflaged to avoid web crawlers.


GOD BLESS AND PLEASE SPREAD THE WORD ABOUT THIS WEBSITE ON SOCIAL MEDIA, ETC.!!!