Overview: This website demonstrates that because of the discovery of DNA in 1953 and the ongoing discoveries about the complexity of cells, it is clear that human DNA and human cells could not have formed by a series of accidents (i.e. they could not have "evolved") and thus the theory of evolution cannot be true.

On this website are two free eBooks and several articles. Everything on this website is free and is available to the general public, but small sections of this website are specifically for members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, also known as the LDS Church or the Mormon church.


The First Book To Describe "Evolution" Was Not Written By Charles Darwin!!

Let us start with a question: what was the first book to describe the theory of evolution in detail, including the doctrine of natural selection, which Darwin claimed to discover?

Most people would say the Origin of Species, in 1859, by Charles Darwin.

But that is not the correct answer.

The first book to describe the theory of evolution, in detail, was the Book of Mormon which was published in 1830 in New York, which was 29 years before Darwin's first book!! The Book of Mormon is a religious history book, like the Bible, but was written by prophets who lived in the Americas and it covers a period of time from the Tower of Babel to about 400 A.D.

While the Book of Mormon describes the theory of evolution in detail (Book of Mormon: Alma 30; natural selection is described in verse 17), the Book of Mormon was extremely critical of the theory of evolution. In fact, the person who taught the theory of evolution was the only enemy of Christ's church who was referred to as an "anti-Christ" (Alma 30:6).

The name of the "anti-Christ" was Korihor, who preached in 74 B.C., which was before the birth of Christ.

No doubt part of the reason Korihor was called the "anti-Christ" was because he taught that God did not exist (Alma 30:28, 38, 43, 48, see: 52-53) and that Christ would never be born (Alma 30:6, 12, 13, 15, 23, 26).

All of Korihor's doctrines were, item by item, exactly the opposite of the doctrines taught by the prophets in his day (74 B.C.), such as Ammon and Alma the Younger. All of the other enemies of the church mentioned in the Book of Mormon taught a mixture or truth and error. But everything Korihor taught was the opposite of the truth.

The reason everything Korihor taught was the opposite of the doctrines of Christ was that Korihor was also the only enemy of the church who was taught his doctrines by a personal appearance of the devil (Alma 30:42, 53)!!

This may explain why Korihor was also the only enemy of the church who was commanded to be struck dumb by a prophet of God (Alma 30:49-50).

The great prophet Alma the Younger described Korihor's doctrines as being designed so that "[the devil] may destroy the children of God" (Alma 30:42). This was Alma the Younger's description of the goal of what we now call: the theory of evolution!!

The Book of Mormon was predicting the coming forth of the false and anti-Christ doctrines of the theory of evolution and it is a warning to members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, and to all others, about these false doctrines!!

The Book of Mormon's inclusion of the story of Korihor was prophetic. There are people today who, like Korihor, are trying to recruit people to atheism and away from Christ and Heavenly Father. Many of the more popular evolutionists today, such as Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris and Christopher Hitchens, write books and give speeches trying to recruit people to atheism.

But what about scientific evidence? There is no scientific evidence for the theory of evolution, which is what the two free eBooks and articles on this website are all about. These documents also expose the tactics of deception of the modern-day Korihor's.


Visual Evidence of the Absurdity of Evolution

When the theory of evolution was proposed by Darwin, scientists knew virtually nothing about cells and certainly nothing about DNA. DNA was not discovered until 1953. As scientific discoveries have developed relative to our understanding of cells and DNA, those who support the theory of evolution have had to adapt their recruiting tools to deal with these new discoveries.

The problem for the atheists and evolutionists is that even the "simplest" cells are massively complex. They are literally like a small city. They could not have formed by accident. As one person put it:

  • "The interior of an animal cell is like a small city, with factories -- called organelles -- dedicated to manufacturing, energy production, waste processing, and other life functions. A network of intercellular "highways," called microtubules, enables bio-molecular complexes, products, and other cargo to move speedily about the cell to keep this vital machinery humming."
    http://www.wpi.edu/academics/provost/tuzelpnas.html

How could a "small city," which can fit inside of a cell, form by accident in a "warm pond?"

A YouTube video is an excellent source to get a small feel for how complex a human cell is. It is a video of what is going on inside of a single cell. As you watch this video keep asking yourself this question: "How could something this complex have formed by accident in a warm pond?" The video is called the "Inner Life of Cell," it was funded by Harvard, and lasts about 8 minutes:
YouTube Video on the Complexity of Cells

If you want to see a one-hour video about the complexity of cells, including the incredible mechanisms inside of cells to deal with a virus attack, see this video made by the British Broadcasting Corporation - Warning, it is very pro-evolution in spite of the fact it proves the theory of evolution is absurd:
YouTube Video by BBC on Cell Defense Mechanisms

Evolutionists, of course, have their spin that the "first living cells" were simple cells. But there is no evidence that "simple cells" have ever existed or that they exist today. All known cells have incredibly complex DNA and complex internal mechanisms which are all synchronized. All real evidence points to a creation.

It gets worse for evolutionists. It is the instructions on DNA that must control the "morphing of the embryo" of an animal, such as humans, which is the morphing that happens from conception to the birth of the baby.

The "morphing of the embryo" algorithms on the DNA control how a single fertilized egg becomes a new baby with trillions of complex cells which must end up in just the right place at just the right time and have just the right genes activated!!

This 9 1/2 minute video graphically shows the "morphing of the embryo" of a human baby, which is controlled by DNA:
YouTube Video on the Morphing of a Baby (i.e. the "Morphing of the Embryo")

The algorithms on the DNA must make sure that every cell in the body of a newborn baby has the correct genes activated and that each cell is attached to the correct cells which surround it.

And a lot of other things must be done during this "morphing of the embryo." For example, if the arteries were not fully enclosed before blood started to circulate in the fetus, the fetus would bleed to death!!

To make matters worse for evolutionists, each species has unique DNA to create the babies in their species.

Who wrote all of the incomprehensibly complex computer programs (on DNA) to create all of the species on this planet?? Random accidents (i.e. evolution) could never have done it once, much less many thousands of times for the thousands of different species on this planet.

Plus, there is the issue of: "what is life?" For example, if you took a fish and left it out of the water until it died. And then you put it back into the water, why doesn't it come back to life? All of the raw elements for life are still in the fish, so why doesn't it come back to life? There is something more to "life" than just cells and oxygen and water.

The theory of evolution should have been thrown in the trash can with the discovery of cells and DNA. The only thing that is "evolving" on this planet is the theory of evolution as evolutionists/atheists constantly need to develop new spin as new discoveries about cells and DNA are made.


The Bible's Explanation For Where DNA Came From

The Bible, in Genesis chapter 2, teaches that Adam,, the first man on this Earth, was created by God. In other words, the Bible says that God designed human DNA. (I will talk about where God came from in a moment).

But a human being consists of an "intelligence," a "spirit" and a "physical body." Our "intelligence" existed first, then it was incorporated into our spirit body. Before we were born on this earth, our spirit bodies lived somewhere else in the "pre-existent world" or "pre-existence."

In the pre-existent world, the "spirit world," before we were placed on this earth, Michael (i.e. later called Adam) was the Savior's top General in the "war of words" that determined who would be born on this earth with a physical body. See this quote from the Bible:

  • 7 And there was war in heaven: Michael [i.e. Adam] and his angels fought against the dragon [i.e. satan who is frequently called Lucifer]; and the dragon fought and his angels,
    8 And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven.
    9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.
    Revelations 12:7-9

The phrase "cast out" means that Lucifer and his followers were sent to earth, never to receive a physical body.

But note that Michael (i.e. Adam) and Lucifer (i.e. satan) knew each other in the pre-existent world.

In addition to the Bible: the Book of Mormon (e.g. 1 Nephi 5:11, 2 Nephi 2: 19-25, etc.), the Doctrine and Covenants (e.g. Section 27:5-14, etc.), and the Pearl of Great Price (e.g. Moses 1:32-35, Moses 3:7-25, etc.) all testify that Adam was the first man and was created by God. He was also a great prophet, second only to Christ in Priesthood authority.

While Michael is still the General of Christ's forces, Lucifer has become the father of all lies. It was Lucifer who taught Korihor that Christ would never be born and he taught him the theory of evolution.

Because Adam (i.e. Michael) cast Lucifer out of heaven, it makes perfect sense that Lucifer would hate Adam and would invent a collection of doctrines to claim that Adam never existed!! These doctrines are at the core of the theory of evolution today!!

The theory of evolution cannot claim that Christ never existed because He is a well-known historical figure, but evolutionists today claim that Christ was not the Son of God because they claim there is no God.

In summary, the Bible and LDS doctrine make it very clear that Heavenly Father, Jesus Christ, the Holy Ghost, Adam and Eve, and Noah and Noah's wife are real beings!!

Yet, the theory of evolution today denies that all seven of these people ever existed (technically atheists today must admit that Christ existed, but they claim He was not divine because they claim there is no God)!!

Note: Noah is also called Gabriel and he is next in line to Adam in priesthood authority per the book: Teachings of Joseph Smith


More About Scientific Theories

So what do atheists and others use as scientific evidence for the theory of evolution?

Their claim is to say that all life on Earth, and all objects in the Universe, began with an accidental explosion, called the "Big Bang."

The accidental Big Bang is claimed to have created 350 billion large galaxies and seven trillion dwarf galaxies, etc.!!
(Source: www.dailygalaxy.com in 2013)

How could a single object, smaller than a pinhead, contain enough mass to create our Universe?? And how could this dense object accidentally explode and create 350 billion large galaxies and trillions of small galaxies??

Scientists also claim that the "Big Bang" eventually led to all planets and all life on this earth.

These claims were designed to convince people that God, Christ and the others just mentioned have never existed (or in the case of Christ, that He was not divine). Plus, without a belief in God there will be no belief in living prophets or life after death, as just two of many other examples of atheistic doctrines.

Speaking of the doctrines of evolution, Elder Russell M. Nelson, a medical doctor and member of the Quorum of Twelve Apostles of the LDS church, posed: "Could an explosion in a printing shop produce a dictionary ... [that could] heal its own torn pages or reproduce its own newer editions?"
"Thanks Be to God," Ensign, April, 2012

Elder Nelson is basically asking: "How could a gigantic, accidental explosion [i.e. the Big Bang], and a massive number of mindless accidents, have created the DNA strands of many thousands of complex species of plants and animals (and many species have the ability to heal some of their own wounds); where each species, after the first single-celled organism (which was created by a series of accidents according to evolution), came to exist by random, accidental mutations to the DNA of a previously existing species?"

A person might believe this sequence of accidents really happened, but the truth is that with the discovery of DNA in 1953 the theory of evolution instantly became scientific nonsense.

Scientists today understand that human DNA has about 3.2 billion base-pairs of nucleotides, however, they have absolutely no clue what 97% of human DNA is used for!! It should be asked: how could something which contains a massive amount of incredibly complex information, which is far too complex for a human to comprehend, have come to exist by an explosion (i.e. the Big Bang) followed by many billions of accidents??

But human DNA is only one example of DNA. There are many thousands of other species of plants and animals which have unique and highly sophisticated DNA!!


The Scientific Theories of Evolutionists

So how do the atheists/evolutionists explain where these incomprehensible structures called "cells" and the incomprehensible computer programs, called DNA, came from?

They ignore the problems caused by the complexity of cells and DNA and simply claim that mankind "evolved," starting with a single-celled organism which formed by a series of accidents.

They claim that the first living organism, a single-cell microbe, formed by accident in a warm pond and that its DNA or RNA randomly and sequentially mutated into numerous slightly more advanced species until human DNA, and thus human beings, came to exist.

Talk about glossing something over!! They might as well say that the blueprints for the Boeing 777 jet came to exist by 5 year old children playing games on their offline computers and the blueprints for the Boeing 777 jet just happened to pop up one day on one of their computers.

In fact, human DNA, as only one example, can be compared to an incomprehensible computer program, and is by far the most sophisticated and complex computer program on the planet earth!! No human is capable of writing a computer program (in base 4, to simulate the A, C, G and T nucleotides) to create a human being from a fertilized egg!!

Have evolutionists ever replicated the accidental creation of a living cell in a "warm pond," complete with the accidental creation of the DNA for the cell?? Don't be absurd. Scientists can't even understand the DNA of a bacteria.

If scientists are NO WHERE NEAR smart enough to write the computer programs for human DNA (in base 4 or any other base), why in the world do evolutionists/atheists claim that human DNA, which is the worlds most sophisticated computer program, was created by a series of accidents!!??

A true "scientist" would never make such absurd claims. The claims are made by those who are like Korihor and are looking to get converts to their religion of atheism. And many other people are understandably duped by their claims, because they hear it from so many sources, and thus follow their lead. And others teach these claims because they are told to teach them.

The fact is that no complex computer program on earth (e.g. programs written in COBOL, Basic or C#) has ever been claimed to have been created by a random number generator!!!

So why is it that the DNA of thousands of species of plants and animals, including humans, which each need their own unique "morphing of the embryo" algorithms, and are by far the most complex computer programs on earth, came to exist by random mutations to the DNA of prior species, all the way back to the "first living cell?"

How can you take an incomprehensible "morphing of the embryo algorithm" of one species, and randomly mutate it and end up with the "morphing of the embryo algorithm" for a more advanced species?

There is zero evidence for any part of the theory of evolution. So how do atheists and evolutionists get converts? They use deception.


Clarifying Some Key Concepts Regarding DNA

Evolutionists cannot prove the theory of evolution by taking a massively complex computer program (e.g. Microsoft Excel) and randomly changing it to create new and improved program with new features.

So without any physical simulation to replicate the theory of evolution, what do scientists use as "evidence" for the theory of evolution?

They have no physical evidence so they resort to deceptive definitions to obtain their "evidence."

So let us begin an introductory discussion of definitions and how they can get intentionally twisted to create "evidence" for evolution.

A "species" of plant or animal, such as a dog or a cat, is created by a unique DNA strand. The DNA contains algorithms to control the creation of the plant or animal. Each "species" has a different and unique and incomprehensibly complex "morphing of the embryo" algorithm on their DNA.

In fact, we could refer to each species, such as a dog, as a "dog morphing of the embryo algorithm," instead of just a "dog." They mean the same thing because it is the "dog morphing of the embryo algorithm" which is what creates a dog from a single fertilized egg!!

A "dog morphing of the embryo algorithm," however, is flexible enough to create a German Shepherd or a Chihuahua or a Great Dane.

The difference between these three breeds of dogs is not in the structure of their DNA, but in variation within that structure.

By "DNA structure" I mean that the genes which make a German Shepherd or a Chihuahua are in exactly the same place on their respective DNA strands. It is the "variety" within the same structure that creates each species.

Think, for a moment, about two online 4th grade math textbooks which have exactly the same number of "bits." They may also have the same number of chapters in the same locations on the soft copies. However, the two eBooks may have been written by different authors and have many differences in their teaching styles, practice tests, etc. Yet, the two books may be the same size and have the same number of chapters, etc.

Both eBooks may be exactly the same length, chapter by chapter, but obviously the "bits" of their programs are different. But their structure, meaing the bits in each chapter, may be the same length.

Likewise, when I talk about "DNA structure" of a German Shepherd versus a Great Dane, the length of the DNA will be exactly the same, but the sequence of nucleotides (A, C, G and T) will be different if you compared them side-by-side.

However, when talking about DNA things can get very complicated. DNA can be broken down into many sections. Some sections create proteins (the sections of DNA that create proteins are called "genes"), other sections control the morphing of the embryo, etc.

Different genes, for example, may create different colors of fur. But the genes are in the same location on their respective DNA and the genes are the same length, which makes them the same "species."

Different morphing of the embryo algorithms may create different shapes of the dogs, but yet the length of their morphing of the embryo algorithms are the same length on their respective DNA.

By definition, the "DNA structure" of a German Shepard and a Chihuahua are the same and thus they are the same "species." Both DNA strands create a "dog," but the variety of nucleotides within the DNA are different.

Here is the key concept: the "species" is defined by the "DNA structure" but the "breed" is defined by the variety within the same, exact "DNA structure."

Thus, the "dog DNA structure" is the pattern for both the DNA of a Great Dane and the DNA of a Chihuahua because they have the same "dog DNA structure."

But the "dog DNA structure" has a different structure than a "cat DNA structure."

One of the things that is on the "dog DNA structure," in addition to genes, is the "dog morphing of the embryo algorithm." It is this algorithm that converts a single cell into a baby Great Dane or a baby Chihuahua.

But the color of the fur, the length of the hair, the length of the tongue, the shape of the tongue, are based on the genes and the "morphing of embryo algorithm" (the genes are actually part of the "morphing of the embryo algorithm" or are accessed by the "morphing of the embryo algorithm").

Each unique species, such as dogs and humans, have different DNA structures, by definition.

I can assure you a "dog morphing of the embryo algorithm" is very different than a "human morphing of the embryo algorithm" or a "chicken morphing of the embryo algorithm."

Each "species" has DNA with a unique sequence of nucleotides (e.g. A, C, G and T) to create plants or animals in that species.

It is highly likely that the "morphing of the embryo algorithm" on the DNA of each plant and animal occupies most of the DNA of that plant or animal. Two chapters in the Patterns of Intelligence book go into this issue in great detail (the two "Morphing of the Embryo" chapters).

So evolution is not just about the phylogeny of species, but it is really about the phylogeny of unique and incomprehensible "morphing of the embryo" algorithms, because it is these algorithms that "create" a unique species from its unique DNA structure.

The phylogenetic tree of evolution is actually a tree of thousands of different and unique "morphing of the embryo" algorithms which reside on thousands of branches.

So to emphasize: a "unique DNA structure" is defined to be a unique combination of genes, unique algorithms, etc. that define a "unique species."

In other words, a "unique species" or simply "species" is the same thing as a "unique DNA structure."

For example, a snail, a dog, a horse and a human being each have a different and unique "DNA structure."

BY DEFINITION, therefore, a snail, a dog, a horse and a human being are different "species."

On the other hand, a Chihuahua, a Great Dane and a German Shepard are all in the same "species" precisely because they all have the same DNA structure, by the definition of a "species."

But a dog and a cat are not in the same "species" precisely because the "DNA structure" of a dog and the "DNA structure" of a cat are different.

This is important to understand because evolutionists use very deceptive definitions to generate their "evidence" for the theory of evolution.


Is the Theory of Evolution Logical?

Evolutionists claim that the "DNA structure" of one species can, by random mistakes, create a new and improved "DNA structure" for a new species. That is the entire foundation of the theory of evolution after the discovery of DNA.

Prior to the discovery of DNA the evolution debate, between "creation scientists" (who believe that God created all species) versus the "evolutionists" (who believe accidents created all species), was all about the fossil record. The discovery of DNA should have changed the debate to a discussion of mathematical probability. That has not happened for obvious reasons.

But is the theory of evolution logical or even possible?

DNA is literally like a complex computer program, as already mentioned. However, is the the most sophisticated computer program on earth. Thus, we can use human designed computer programs to talk about the feasibility of the theory of evolution because DNA is a God designed computer program.

Could you take a human designed computer program that kept track of appointments for a dentist office and randomly change the "bits" on the program and end up with a computer program that could control the schedules for everyone in a large corporation??

Never in a million years.

Likewise, if you randomly added, changed and deleted a million nucleotides on the DNA of a baboon, chimpanzee, bonobo (pygmy chimpanzee) or gorilla, in random locations, would you really expect to end up with a human being?

Don't be absurd!! In a billion attempts it would not even be remotely successful a single time!!

Any computer programmer, who has extensive experience working with random number generators, will tell you that randomness never creates intelligence or adds intelligence!! Never!!

This is a key concept: You cannot take an existing, highly complex human-designed computer program, and randomly mutate it and end up with an even more complex and more sophisticated computer program which has new features!!

The key is the concept of "new features." The theory of evolution claims that evolution created the "new features" of every plant and animal on this planet.

There would be no need for computer programmers if this type of event were true! In other words, the mere fact that there are many thousands of computer programers is a proof that the theory of evolution cannot be true. You would only need one computer programmer on this planet if the theory of evolution were true.

Even if it took a few million attempts to take an existing computer program and randomly mutate it into a superior computer program, with new features, the theory of evolution would be believable. But not even in a billion attempts, could you take an existing, highly complex computer program and randomly mutate it into a newer, more useful computer program, which had new features.

In fact, NO functional computer program in the history of this earth was written exclusively by a random number generator which generated its binary code.

NOR has a new and improved functional computer program been created (with new features) by randomly modifying the binary code of an existing sophisticated computer program.

Yet the claim of evolutionists is that EVERY DNA strand on this earth was created by randomly mutating the DNA of a prior species (except for the "first living cell")!!

And human DNA is far more complex than any computer program ever written by human beings.

What is wrong with this picture!!??

In addition, any mathematician, who has extensive experience working with permutations of large numbers of objects (in this case large numbers of nucleotides), would tell you that viable permutations (which, for example, would create a viable animal) are such an incredibly small percentage of all possible permutations, that the theory of evolution cannot be true!!

This, in fact, is an important issue. If there were quadrillions and quadrillions of different ways to order DNA and be able to create a new species, then the theory of evolution would still have zero scientific merit because of the astronomical number of possible permutations of nucleotides.

So what does all of this have to do with the theory of evolution?

After the discovery of DNA the evolution debate should have shifted from studying fossils to a statistical analysis of DNA. But that has not happened because evolutionists know they will lose that battle!!

Computer programmers who have extensive experience working with random number generators, as I do, will tell you that you cannot convert the DNA of a mouse into the DNA of a more advanced species by randomly changing the DNA of the mouse!!

In fact, if you start randomly changing the DNA of a mouse you will very quickly end up with totally worthless DNA which cannot even create a mouse, much less create a species superior to a mouse!!

Randomness ALWAYS REDUCES intelligence, it NEVER INCREASES intelligence!!

Yet, evolutionists claim that RANDOMNESS ALMOST ALWAYS INCREASES the amount of intelligence on a DNA strand to create a new and improved species.

The two free eBooks on this website demonstrate why randomness never "adds" intelligence and why it always "destroys" intelligence.


Where Are The Failures of Evolution?

Computer simulations will demonstrate, quite forcefully, that in billions of attempts to randomly change the DNA of an existing species, in order to create a new and improved species, in not one single attempt would a new and improved species be created if at least one new gene were required and the location (i.e. the location on the DNA of each new, changed or deleted nucleotide) on the DNA was randomly chosen for each added, changed and deleted nucleotide!!

In short, to say that the real theory of evolution, even if it were true, would have had zero failures is mathematical nonsense in the extreme. Even if evolution were true; there would be many, many trillions of animals with defective DNA which would not have been able to reproduce but would have been worthless mutants.

So where are the trillions and trillions of mutated fossils (i.e. of dead and deformed animals whose randomly mutated DNA failed to create a viable new species) that evolution would create in trying to create all of the species that exist on this planet?? There are none.

Evolutionists claim that many thousands of species were created by evolution, but there is zero evidence of any failed attempts to create new species. This makes the claims of the theory of evolution far beyond ludicrous.

Yes, plants and animals do occasionally have DNA damage, but never does this DNA damage provide a true survival advantage. In other words, the mutations do not provide more strength, more cunning, more speed, etc.

Computer simulations demonstrate that "random locations" means the set of nucleotides that are randomly chosen (to be added, deleted or changed) will be fairly evenly spread across the entire DNA. And likewise where these nucleotides end up will be fairly evenly spread across the entire DNA.

But the concept of "new genes" being created by evolution requires clusters of new sequences of nucleotides in very precise locations.

Let us define a "parent species" to be the "old species" that had its DNA randomly mutated in the creation of a new "child species." The "child species" is the new species created by evolution, from the "parent species," by definition.

Changing the "computer programs" on the DNA of a parent species to create the "computer programs" for the new child species (e.g. the "computer programs" control the "morphing of the embryo" among other things) would require large numbers of changes, scattered over the most of the length of the DNA, to create the new "computer programs" for the new "child species."

But randomness never creates intelligence or a new and improved species.

Let us get back to math textbooks for a moment to demonstrate the absurdity of the theory of evolution.

Suppose you took a soft copy (i.e. a digital copy) of a fourth grade math textbook and randomly changed, moved and deleted: spaces, letters, numbers, symbols and punctuation (both individually or in clumps):
from (in the case of moves) randomly chosen locations on the fourth grade math textbook and:
to (in the case of moves) randomly chosen locations on the fourth grade math textbook.

Now suppose you also added many randomly chosen spaces, letters, numbers, symbols and punctuation to randomly chosen locations on the fourth grade math textbook.

This is the key question: would you really expect that this effort would create a new fifth grade math textbook complete with new and more advanced math concepts and new and more advanced math problems, complete with the answers to the new math problems ending up in the correct chapter locations?

I can assure you that the authors of real math textbooks must go through many revisions before they are satisfied they "got it right." And this is using intelligence!!

Creating a new math textbook by using pure randomness would never be successful, no matter how many times you tried it!! What you would end up with would be more and more gibberish. The teaching value of the textbook, for fourth grade or fifth grade students, would continuously deteriorate as the random changes were made!!

Yet, evolutionists claim that the DNA of many thousands of different species were all RANDOMLY generated by accidental mutations to the DNA of a prior species (which they claim also had DNA which was randomly generated). Thus, they claim that human DNA can theoretically be traced back to a single-celled organism. And they claim that the errors of this process were few and far between.

Both logic and computer simulations would predict that each succeding new species (from the first living cell) would accumulate more and more defective DNA as time went on. Even if evolution were true, by now human DNA would be riddled with defects!!! But the truth is that humans would never exist using evolution.

Human DNA is virtually perfect which is a proof that evolution is not even remotely true.

The DNA of all species is more like a highly sophisticated computer program NOT a math textbook. If evolution doesn't work to create a new textbook, it certainly won't work with DNA.

The complete absurdity of the theory of evolution (after the discovery of DNA) is so obvious, that the very day Watson and Crick announced they had discovered DNA, in 1953, the scientific establishment should have abandoned the theory of evolution and admitted their theories were wrong!! (Note: I am not talking about science teachers who are frequently told what to teach, I am talking about the scientific establishment which originates the bogus science of evolution.)

So why do evolutionists go to such extremes to claim that human DNA, and the DNA of many thousands of other species, were created exclusively by nucleotides accidentally being added, changed or deleted to the DNA of a prior species?

The reason is that many of the leading evolutionists who write the pro-evolution books, such as Richard Dawkins and the late Stephen Jay Gould, are atheists and they are looking to get converts to atheism, as already mentioned.

Their power in the schools is so great, that any teacher who teaches "creation science" (i.e. that God created all species) risks being censured or fired in some school districts!!

So if the scientists, who are atheists and who push the theory of evolution, have zero valid scientific evidence for "evolution," how do they convince others that the theory of evolution is true?

They do it by making the theory of evolution look sophisticated and popular and by using fraud, deceptions, assumptions and outright lies. For example, they may use simple, scientific facts and then use clever and deceptive definitions to make it appear that simple facts are evidence for the theory of evolution. It is not science, it is recruiting people to become atheists by using deception.

In fact, bad mathematics and deceptive definitions are two of the main "evidences" for the theory of evolution. It takes seven chapters in my "Patterns of Intelligence" book to unravel several of their intertwined, highly deceptive definitions!!


Where Did God Come From?

So if many Christian churches, including the Mormon/LDS church, claim that God created all species, it is perfectly fair to ask: Where did God come from?

The prophet Brigham Young, the second President of the LDS church and a contemporary of Darwin (they were born about 8 years apart), must have been asked about the origin of man with this type of question: "if Darwin was wrong, and if God created humans, then where did God come from?"

This was his answer:

  • "Many have tried to penetrate to the First Cause of all things [i.e. the origin of God]; but it would be as easy for an ant to number the grains of sand on the earth. It is not for man, with his limited intelligence, to grasp eternity in his comprehension ... It would be as easy for a gnat to trace the history of man back to his origin as for man to fathom the First Cause of all things, lift the veil of eternity, and reveal the mysteries that have been sought after by philosophers from the beginning."
    Brigham Young, second president of the LDS church (October 9, 1859)
    Journal of Discourses, Volume 7, Page 284

President Young was making it very clear that we mortals cannot even begin to comprehend eternity and the origin of God. Could an amoeba comprehend the religious doctrines in the Bible or design the blueprints for a new skyscraper?? Try to teach an amoeba high school algebra to the point it can pass a test!!

Just like an amoeba could not comprehend the religious doctrines in the Bible, or design a new skyscraper, we humans do not yet have the intelligence to comprehend the origin of God or even to comprehend how God thinks!! We will never have this intelligence while we are in mortality.

Brigham Young said this about God:

  • He is the Supreme Controller of the universe. At his rebuke the sea is dried up, and the rivers become a wilderness. He measures the waters in the hollow of his hand, and meteth out heaven with a span, and comprehendeth the dust of the earth in a measure, and weigheth the mountains in scales, and the hills in a balance; the nations to him are as a drop in a bucket, and he taketh up the isles as a very little thing; the hairs of our heads are numbered by him, and not a sparrow falleth to the ground without our Father; and he knoweth every thought and intent of the hearts of all living, for he is everywhere present by the power of his Spirit -- his minister, the Holy Ghost.

    He is the Father of all, is above all, through all, and in you all [see Ephesians 4:6]; he knoweth all things pertaining to this earth, and he knows all things pertaining to millions of earths like this.
    Brigham Young: 1998-1999 Priesthood/R.S. Manual - page 30
    Journal of Discourses, Volume 11, Page 41

Perhaps the day will come (long after we are resurrected) when we can comprehend the origin of God. The scriptures tell us very clearly that we are literally the children of God and that we are joint heirs with Christ (see: Romans 8:16-18).

Elder Russell M. Nelson said: "Who are we? We are children of God. Our potential is unlimited. Our inheritance is sacred."
"We Are Children of God," Ensign, October, 1998

But just because we cannot comprehend eternity now, because we are literally the Children of God, we have far greater potential that we can currently comprehend.

The day will come when all will be resurrected, both the just and the unjust. We cannot conceive, at this time, the things we will be able to comprehend a million years after we are resurrected.

God is a loving God, not a tyrant. He wants us to succeed!! It is important to understand that God has a bright future in store for those who will keep his commandments or if needed, will change their ways. President George Q. Cannon said this about those who may need to change their ways:

  • “No matter how serious the trial, how deep the distress, how great the affliction, [God] will never desert us. He never has, and He never will. He cannot do it. It is [against] His character [to do so]. He is an unchangeable being. … He will stand by us. We may pass through the fiery furnace; we may pass through deep waters; but we shall not be consumed nor overwhelmed. We shall emerge from all these trials and difficulties the better and the purer for them, if we only trust in our God and keep His commandments.”
    "Freedom of the Saints," in Collected Discourses, comp. by Brian H. Stuy, 5 vols. [1987-92], 2:185

And that is the difference between the theory of evolution and the true doctrine of God. Satan would have us believe that God does not exist (or that if He does exist He is a tyrant who wants us to fail) and that at death we cease to exist.

But God would have us understand that we are His children and that He loves us. He is quick to forgive and we can become more like Him as we progress throughout the eternities!!!

President John Taylor, the third President of the LDS church, said:

  • For we, as Latter-day Saints, do not consider that our existence ends with time, as we generally term it, but that it reaches into eternity. And that while we are here in a state of probation to fulfill the various duties [placed] upon us, as Saints of the living God; while we come into the world and exist in it for a time and then leave it, we have hopes and aspirations beyond the grave, and anticipate that, as ages and cycles shall pass along and generation succeeds generation, if we are true to our trust and live our religion, keeping the commandments of God and fulfilling the various covenants [we have accepted] ..., that we shall associate with the just in the eternities to come! Therefore we are living, and hoping, and expecting, and planning, and contriving and operating, for the accomplishment of this object. We do not look upon the affairs of this life as those alone in which humanity is interested.
    President John Taylor, January 2nd, 1881: "The Eternities Before the Saints"

It is impossible to find any two doctrines that are as opposite as the doctrines of evolution and the doctrines of the living prophets. The two sets of beliefs are antithetical (i.e. directly opposed or mutually incompatible).

The doctrines of God are pure light and inspiring. They motivate us to move forward in our progression. The doctrines of evolution are dark and depressing because they cast humans as nothing but animals which have no purpose and cease to exist at death.

But as Elder Nelson said: "We are children of God. Our potential is unlimited. Our inheritance is sacred."



About This Website

This website is the home of two free eBooks and several articles which are definitely not favorable to the theory of evolution. The older book is over 400 pages long and the newer and more advanced "Patterns of Intelligence" book is over 260 pages long!!

Both of my eBooks can be read online and/or downloaded for free!! There are also several articles on this website. All articles and books are linked to below.

My email address is at the bottom of this page if you have any comments or questions or need help debating someone who believes the evolutionists. Don't forget to tell your friends about this website!!

Everything on this website is free, so let us now look at the free resources on this website.


Non-Technical Article (18 pages): Prophetic Book of Mormon Warnings

This short article goes into more detail about prophets and evolution than what I just mentioned. However, if you plan on reading the Patterns of Intelligence book mentioned below, which is over 260 pages long, it is not necessary to read this article.
Article: Prophetic Book of Mormon Warnings (pdf file)


Spreadsheet: Alma 30: Doctrines of Korihor and Evolution

As a support to the above article, this spreadsheet shows the vast differences between what Korihor taught (i.e. what evolution teaches) and LDS doctrine. This spreadsheet goes verse by verse in Alma chapter 30 and explains the similarities between the teachings of Korihor and the doctrines of the theory of evolution. It also shows how each is the opposite of LDS doctrine:
Spreadsheet: Doctrines of Korihor and Evolution (Excel 2003 file)


Semi-Technical Article (14 pages): Why The Confusion About Evolution?

Note: If you read the Patterns of Intelligence book mentioned below, it is not necessary to read this article.

The intentional deceptions of evolutionists, by the use of clever terminology, are why there is such a wide diversity of opinions about evolution among LDS scientists. Very few members of the church understand the sophistication of the deceptions of the scientific establishment.

While these discussions are also in the Patterns of Intelligence book, to be discussed in a moment, if you want a quick lesson in understanding the deceptive definitions used by the scientific establishment, this article is for you.
Article: Why The Confusion About Evolution (pdf file)


Chapter Summary Medium-size eBook (37 pages, pdf file): Patterns of Intelligence - Chapter Summary

If you want a quick, high level overview of the Patterns of Intelligence book, this article has a short summary of each chapter in the 266 page medium-size this book:
Summary: Patterns of Intelligence - Chapter Summary Only


Technical Medium-size eBook (266 pages, pdf file): Patterns of Intelligence

While the large book on this website is the "B-2 Bomber" of anti-evolution books, this book is the "F-22 Raptor" of anti-evolution books. This free book is actually much more current on the issues of the great scientific deceptions which are going on and the mathematical reasons evolution cannot be true. However, it does not go into the depth of the long book on the mathematical reasons evolution cannot be true.

Did you know that if you listed all major LDS doctrines and then took the opposite of each of these doctrines you would end up with the theory of evolution doctrines!! This book will produce such a detailed list in Chapter 2.

In this book you will see one of the main arguments of the large book, called "Patterns of Intelligence." This eBook has some really cool graphs.

But there are many things in the medium size book which are not in the large book. For example, chapters 22 and 23 of this book contain an amazing discussion which demonstrates that there is no where near enough information on DNA to control the "morphing of the embryo" algorithms!! Either God Himself designed DNA (and we cannot even remotely understand it) or the morphing of the embryo has help from the other side of the veil. There is no other option!!

WATCH THIS VIDEO which has video images of the morphing of the embryo and then look at my two chapters on the mathematics of the morphing of the embryo and you will understand the absurdity of the theory of evolution:
Morphing of the Embryo Video!!!

Here is a link to the chapters in the medium-sized book. Each chapter is a file so it is easy to focus on one chapter at a time:
Free eBook: Patterns of Intelligence (pdf file for each chapter)

Here is a link to the medium-sized book in one file. As always, you are welcome to read it online, download it, or print it out:
Free eBook: Patterns of Intelligence (pdf file)


Technical Long eBook (407 pages, pdf file): Prophets or Evolution - An LDS Perspective

This book is the "B-2 Bomber" of anti-evolution books. It demolishes the theory of evolution time after time and takes no enemies. The discovery of DNA has created an avalanche of ways to prove the theory of evolution is scientific nonsense.

This free eBook is available in both HTML and PDF formats and both versions can be looked at online or can be downloaded. For example, you can download the PDF version and print it out so you can mark it up. As always, you don't even need to tell me you downloaded it!!

The long eBook is called "Prophets or Evolution - An LDS Perspective," which:
1) Compares the doctrines of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (i.e. LDS church) to the theory of evolution (chapters 1-12),
2) Details many of the massive scientific problems with the theory of evolution (chapters 13-36).

The book in HTML format (by chapter):
Free eBook: Prophets or Evolution - An LDS Perspective (html version)

A printable version of the entire book (407 pages) is available in pdf format and can be read or downloaded from this link. It can also be printed out:
Free eBook: Prophets Or Evolution - An LDS Perspective (pdf file)


A Chapter of the Long Book: "Seven Scientific Reasons ... Evolution Cannot be True"

The complete "Prophets or Evolution" book is over 400 pages. This is a link to one of the key chapters in the main eBook. This chapter is a high level overview of seven of the main scientific reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true. It also mentions seven other reasons evolution cannot be true. Here is a link to this chapter:
Chapter: Seven Scientific Reasons the Theory of Evolution Cannot be True


Statement: The 1909 Official Statement of the First Presidency of the LDS Church

The 1909 statement of the First Presidency on the theory of evolution remains the official document of the church on the theory of evolution. This statement in 1909 was reprinted in the 2002 Ensign. It remains not only the official doctrine of the church, but the best description of the origin of man outside of the scriptures!! It is highly, highly recommended to the reader to study this document very carefully!!! It is unlike anything else you can read on the subject of evolution!!

Here is a link to this magnificent article:
Statement: "The Origin of Man" (Official 1909 First Presidency Statement)

Here is a 14 page article with my comments about the 1909 and 1910 statements of the First Presidency. My comments focus of the relationship between the statements of the First Presidency and what scientists knew between 1909 and 1953:
Article: Understanding the Context of the 1909 and 1910 Statements of the First Presidency


The Nature of God!! (Talk by Elder Jeffrey L. Holland)

What kind of being is God?? To those who fear they may have sinned beyond the range of the atonement, there is a magnificent message in this general conference talk about the true nature of God!!
Article: He Hath Filled the Hungry with Good Things


Booklet: True To the Faith (First Presidency)

In addition to the 1909 article, an official booklet issued by the First Presidency in 2004: True to the Faith - A Gospel Reference, while not specifically about evolution, describes church doctrines which are the very antithesis of the doctrines of the theory of evolution (e.g. See topics: Atonement of Jesus Christ; Creation; Fall; God the Father; etc.). This booklet is available on www.lds.org:
Booklet: True to the Faith (Official 2004 First Presidency Booklet)


The Prophetic Future of the LDS Church (Talk by President Spencer W. Kimball)

Do you want to know the future of the LDS church? A general conference talk by President Spencer W. Kimball provides a clear vision of what the future of the LDS church will be.
Article: The Prophetic Future of the LDS Church


The False Gods We Worship (Article by President Spencer W. Kimball)

This classic article by President Spencer W. Kimball explains about the false gods some members of the church (and to some degree all of us) worship. Its lesson applies directly to the youth of the church!!
Article: The False Gods We Worship


Beware of the Evil Behind the Smiling Eyes (Talk by Elder Neil L. Anderson)

Many attempts to lead the youth of the church astray are made by those who appear to be harmless or even friendly. This talk by Elder Neil L. Anderson, of the Quorum of the Twelve, is a warning to the youth of the church about those with "smiling eyes" who are not who they claim to be.
Article: Beware of the Evil Behind the Smiling Eyes


Quotes: The Power of God and the Future of the Church

These two articles contains quotes from the scriptures and from the living prophets and apostles about the power of God, the future of the LDS church and the final triumph of good over evil.
Quotes: The Power of God and the Future of the Church - Scriptures
Quotes: The Power of God and the Future of the Church - Prophets


The Role and Importance of the LDS Church President

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints is led by a "living prophet." This article is designed to clarify the role and importance of the President of the LDS church. It is mostly quotes of several prominent church leaders about the role and importance of the LDS church President.
Quotes: The Role and Importance of the LDS Church President


Quotes About Church Membership

These are quotes about membership in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. The quotes come from the prophets and apostles.
Quotes About Church Membership


Website: Quotes of LDS Prophets and Apostles

This website has quotes from all of the Presidents of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and many of the Apostles of the church. There are many very powerful quotes on this website.
Quotes of LDS Prophets and Apostles


Video: Creation and Evolution - A Witness of Prophets

This is an outstanding video dealing with the theory of evolution, and especially the quotes of living prophets regarding the theory of evolution.

The official position of the LDS church on the theory of evolution is made very clear in this video!! Many quotes of presidents of the church and modern apostles are presented.

This video is highly recommended for anyone who wonders how the church leaders feel about Darwin and his theory of evolution.

To Obtain a Copy, Visit:
Video: Creation and Evolution



Other Anti-Evolution Books

If you listen to the propaganda of the pro-evolution monopoly you might think that anyone who believes in creation science is a dolt. Nothing could be further from the truth. There are many "creation scientists" (i.e. those who believe God created this Universe) who are brilliant and have no problems seeing through the false science generated by the scientific establishment.

In fact, many anti-evolution books have been written by brilliant scientists. This listing of anti-evolution books and DVDs contains only a small sampling of the anti-evolution books which exist in print. In fact, there are more than 200 anti-evolution books.

Many of the books were written by PhDs in the sciences. The arguments in these books totally shred the theory of evolution from a scientific standpoint.

Some of these books may be out of print and you may have to use a book finder, such as Alibris, to find them.

Here is a link to this appendix:
Appendix: Books and Movies Against the Theory of Evolution


Other LDS Websites on Evolution

This is a web page that links to other websites which discuss LDS doctrine versus the theory of evolution:
Links to Other Websites

Here is an old version of the "Patterns of Intelligence" book:
Patterns of Intelligence (Old HTML Version)



To Learn More About the LDS Church

To learn more about the LDS church, here is their official website to introduce people to the LDS church:
To Learn About the LDS Church


Church Policy

Even though the LDS Church officially rejects the theory of evolution (see the 1909 Statement, linked to above, and the Book of Mormon, Alma chapter 30, among many other documents), no book or article which is involved in scientific debates or which discusses the scientific issues of the theory of evolution, even if it strongly supports official church doctrine, is endorsed by the LDS church unless it is part of an official church publication.

The gospel deals with eternal and unchanging truths but all of the fields of science constantly change as new discoveries are made. Thus, the church does not establish any scientific claim as being absolute.

As a result, the books and articles written by R. Webster Kehr represent the opinions of the author and are too scientific to be published or endorsed by the LDS church.



About The Author, R. Webster Kehr

I am an LDS "creation scientist" (i.e. anti-evolutionist) with a B.S. in mathematics (1972) and accounting (1974) from BYU, and I am more than happy to point out the deceptions of the evolutionists.

I make my living as a cancer researcher (of natural medicine) and work with thousands of cancer patients every year. I wrote almost all of the articles on the www.cancertutor.com website. It turns out that natural cancer treatments are far, far more effective than orthodox cancer treatments. The www.cancertutor.com website is a great resource for all cancer patients.

My wife Marit is from Norway. We met in Provo, Utah a month before I left on my mission to California. She is a genealogist and we have seven children and 19 grandchildren - scattered from Idaho to Georgia.

We live in the Topeka, Kansas Stake and I work one evening a week in the Kansas City Temple of the LDS church.


Whether you have a question or a comment, please feel free to email me. I love to communicate with students about the theory of evolution.

(My email address is camouflaged to avoid web crawlers)