Welcome To The "Prophets Or Evolution" Website!!
What is the "theory of evolution" debate all about??
The prophets, ancient and modern, have always taught, and currently teach, that God lives and that He is very much alive and knows what is going on on this planet even now.
The creation scientists teach that the scientific evidence supports the words of the prophets. These people are also called anti-evolutionists.
On the other hand, the atheists and evolutionists want people to believe that God does not exist.
The atheists and evolutionists claim that DNA, cells, etc. were created without God, meaning purely by accident.
The creation scientists and evolutionists are in a war of words, science and logic with each other. The "weapons" are scientific evidence. The creation scientists claim that DNA, cells, etc. are massively too sophisticated to have come to exist without the Intelligence and abilities of God.
In summary, we humans, and all other living things, exist because of God or accidents!!!
This "Prophets Or Evolution" website is by far the best anti-evolution website (i.e. the best creation science website) on the Internet. And everything on this website is free!!
For example, this website has a single article with more than 400 reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true!!! And that is just one article!! This website also contains dozens of other free articles and two free eBooks!!
And never forget the warning in the book of Matthew in the Bible: "And fear not them that kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul; but rather fear Him that is able to destroy both soul and body in hell." Matthew 10:28
The evolution debate is not an academic exercise to entertain people, the debate is for the souls of men and women, young and old.
Please Share This Website With Others
Please share this amazing website with 15 or 20 of your friends on social media (e.g. Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, Pinterest, etc.) and ask your friends to share this site with 15 or 20 of their friends on social media!! Also, please link to this website from your website!! JOIN THE WAR AND PASS IT ON TO OTHERS!!!!!
While most of this website is for the general public, there are articles linked to below in an "Additional Section For Latter-Day Saints (i.e. Mormons)," though anyone is welcome to read these articles. This section has a yellow background.
My biography and email address are at the very bottom of this page.
The Theory of Evolution Versus God Debate
The "theory of evolution debate" is between the atheists and evolutionists (who do not believe in God) versus the "creation scientists" (who believe in God).
So what is the "theory of evolution?" It should be emphasized that "evolution" is not a force in nature such as gravity or sunlight!! Evolution is only a belief that that there is no God!!
Because the atheists and evolutionists claim that there is no God; the "theory of evolution" should actually be called the "theory of accidents" because "evolution" itself doesn't do anything, it is just a way of claiming there is no God, thus everything had to be created by accidents.
In short, the evolution debate is literally a debate between a belief in God versus a belief in accidents.
Let's start this debate by talking about human DNA and ask ourselves whether human DNA could have been designed and created by a series of accidents (i.e. by evolution).
The human DNA strand which is inside the fertilized egg of a new human mother contains 3.2 billion nucleotides (A, C, G, or T), which is a computer program that is so sophisticated that a single cell, with a single DNA strand (which is seven feet long and is coiled up), namely the fertilized egg inside of a mother-to-be, has the intelligence on the DNA to create an entire human baby, via 30 billion cell divisions, who has 30 billion cells and 60,000 miles of blood vessels, etc.
The 60,000 miles of blood vessels in this newborn baby would wrap around the earth at the equator twice, with 10,000 miles of blood vessels left over!!
When the baby is born he or she will have an incredible brain which is connected to a massive nervous system, a skull to protect the brain, a spine to protect the spinal cord (the spinal cord is a cylindrical bundle of nerve fibers), two eyes which are connected to the nervous system, a beating heart, a liver, a pancreas, 300 bones (which eventually fuse into 206 bones), etc. etc.!!
The DNA in a sperm cell of the father of the baby contributes part of the DNA for the new baby and the DNA in the mother's ovum (egg) contributes part of the DNA for the new baby. Thus, the DNA strands from the mother and father must align with each other!!!
But it's even more complicated than that. There are actually two types of male DNA strands: "male sperm cells" and "female sperm cells." If a male sperm cell gets to the mother's egg first (along with its DNA), a male baby will result. If a female sperm cell gets to the mother's egg first (along with its DNA), a female baby will result.
The sex of the baby is literally a swimming race of sperm cells to get to the ovum first!!
But note that the three DNA strands (2 from the father, though only one is used each time conception happens, and one from the mother) must align with each other!!
In other words, there are THREE DNA strands to which the permutations apply - 2 of the father and 1 of the mother!! Each male DNA strand must align with the female DNA strand. Each of the three stands has the 3.2 billion nucleotides and each male strand must align with the female strand in terms of function (e.g. genes).
Yet each of these three DNA strands has a different permutation of nucleotides!!
Because of the sophistication of DNA, all of the human scientists on this planet could not create a single DNA strand from scratch and certainly not a human DNA strand. But even if they could, all of the human scientists on this planet could not sequence (i.e. put the nucleotides in a functional ordering) three human DNA strands to create a human baby!! This same concept applies to all animals.
In fact, scientists are NOT EVEN CLOSE to decoding the entire DNA strand of any plant, animal or insect!!!
And there are more than a million "species" of plants, animals and insects on this planet, each with unique and highly sophisticated DNA. And many of these species have both a male and female (e.g. bonobos) which have three DNA strands which need to align in a very precise way!! No team of humans on this planet understand the DNA of an ant, much less human DNA.
There are many more issues related to the theory of evolution on this website, but let's cut to the chase.
"Evolution (i.e. accidents) has never created anything and will never create anything!!
Yet the atheists claim that evolution (i.e. accidents) has created the Universe, our galaxy, our sun, the planets, including our earth and moon, the atmosphere around our earth, the oceans and other water on our Earth, the DNA of plants, animals (including humans), etc. purely by accidents.
When listening to an atheist or evolutionist they make it sound that "evolution" is as smart as God and that evolution designs and creates things. But "evolution" does not have a brain, nor can it create anything!! "Evolution" is simply a belief by atheists and evolutionists that there is no God.
"Creation scientists," on the other hand, are those who believe in God and they claim that the Universe, the physical constants, DNA, cells, etc. are far too sophisticated to have been created by accidents, thus there must be a God who designed and created all of these things.
Of course, the atheists would say "where did God come from?" I will tell you what Brigham Young, a contemporary of Darwin, said about this question:
Considering that there are many millions of square miles of sand on this earth (there are more than 5,000,000 square miles of sand just on the north pole and south pole), any ant which tries to count all of the grains of sand would not even remotely live long enough to count a billionth of all the grains of sand on this planet.
God has had an eternity to "progress." We are late-comers to all that has happened.
Let's talk about DNA. It is a fact that all of the scientists on this planet could not create a single DNA strand from scratch, not even for an ant!!! But even if they could, they would have no clue how to sequence (i.e. order) the nucleotides on the DNA of an ant!!
In fact, scientists have not decode the complete DNA strand of any plant, animal or insect. Scientists are NOT EVEN CLOSE to decoding the entire DNA strand of any plant or animal!!!
Just like the '0's and '1's of a compiled computer program must be in a perfect sequence in order for a computer program to function properly, the A, C, G and T nucleotides on a DNA strand must be in a perfect sequence in order to create a viable and unique human baby via billions of cell divisions!!!
A unique sequence of nucleotides is called a "permutation" of nucleotides.
How would you like to try to align the object code (i.e. the compiled code) of three massively sophisticated, but very different, computer programs (a "male" or "female" computer program [from the dad] with a "gender neutral" computer program [from the mother]) in order to create a new computer program (e.g. a "baby" computer program) which has features of two of the original computer programs!!
Yet that is exactly what happens at and after human conception with three DNA strands, each of which is massively beyond the comprehension of any human being on earth!!!
Human DNA is literally the most sophisticated computer program on earth!! No human-designed computer program is even remotely as sophisticated as human DNA.
Scientists have studied human DNA since 1953 and they still only understand about 2% of human DNA.
Let's get to the point. With all of the information on DNA, is it logical to conclude that human DNA, and the DNA for more than a million other species, many of which have both males and females, were created by a series of mindless and directionless accidents!!?? In other words, was all of this created by nothing but blind accidents (i.e. evolution) which have no goal or direction??? ABSOLUTELY NOT!!!!
In fact, the theory of evolution (i.e. the theory of accidents) is mindless nonsense and is nothing but a recruiting tool for atheists and evolutionists!!
Do all scientists believe the nonsense of the theory of evolution? No!!!! Many scientists, who are called "creation scientists," believe that God lives and that God designed and created all things (as taught by the prophets in the Bible, Book of Mormon and other scriptures).
However, many scientists do not believe in God (i.e. the atheists and most evolutionists) and they claim that the Universe, and everything in the Universe, such as human DNA, came to exist purely by a series of accidents.
In summary, humans (i.e. human DNA) exist because of God or accidents!!! That is the central question of the evolution debate!!
It is God versus accidents.
God Predicted The Theory Of Evolution Was Coming Before Darwin Wrote His First Book!!
While the theory of evolution is a debate about God verus accidents, God predicted the battle was coming three decades before the theory of evolution even existed!!
The first book to describe the theory of evolution both predicted and rejected the theory of evolution. The Book of Mormon was published in 1830, which was 29 years before Darwin's first book!!! But the Book of Mormon REJECTED the theory of evolution in two different chapters and to some degree in a third chapter.
See this article for more details:
Digging Even Deeper Into Science
Let us bring up another of the many issues related to DNA. How could the alignment of male DNA and female DNA have "evolved" (via trial and error from species to new species) because if the alignment was not perfect the first time, in an attempt to create a new species from an old species, there would never have been a viable baby to perpetuate a new species!! DNA is "irreducibly complex," meaning every piece and sequence had to work the first time. For example, humans could not have "evolved" piecemeal from prior species (e.g. a bonobo).
As another issue with evolution, if you had 99% of a complete DNA strand from the male and 97% of a complete DNA strand of the female (during the evolutionary process), this male and female could not have had any children!! Only 100% complete DNA from the male and 100% complete DNA from the female can align and create a viable child!!
And if you understood the physical construction of DNA you would know that DNA CANNOT BE CHANGED, IT CAN ONLY BE DAMAGED!!! For example, neither scientists nor accidents can physically change the DNA of a male bonobo to create the DNA of a male human. The only thing that can happen is that DNA can be damaged and become useless. It can never be improved. More on this in a moment.
But there is another factor that is involved in what we will look like when we are born. Before we were born we were a pure spirit in the "pre-existence." This spirit also affects what we look like when we are born. So what we look like when we are born is a combination of what our spirit looks like (and what our spirit looks like does not change over time) combined with one of the DNA stands of our father and the DNA of our mother. So what we look like is a combination of three things: our spirit and two DNA strands.
So ignoring the influence of our spirit, here is the key question: where did these three highly sophisticated DNA strands (two from the father and one from the mother) come from for thousands of animal species??
Anyone with a functional knowledge of permutations and statistics would immediately know that God is the creator of our spirit and He designed the DNA of our father and mother and thus God is behind what we look like and how we function!!!
In fact, the biggest problem in the evolution debate is that very few people have the mathematics background to understand the permutation issues relative to about a million different species, many of which have both male and female DNA (more will be said about permutations below).
Why Does The Theory of Evolution Exist?
Are the atheists and evolutionists so stupid they think that human DNA came to exist by a series of accidents?? I don't know, but what I do know is that they are so proud that they do not want to believe in God. They want their students and others to believe that THEY are the most intelligent beings in the Universe!!
The entire foundation of the theory of evolution is arrogance. Many scientists want their students and others to believe that THEY are the most intelligent beings in the Universe.
But if there were no God then there would be no DNA for any species and no humans would exist!!
The goal of inventing the "theory of accidents" is so the atheists and evolutionists can convince students and others that there is no God and that everything in the Universe, including the Universe itself, was created by pure accidents (i.e. evolution)!! As this website will demonstrate, in hundreds of different ways, the theory of accidents is only a fairy tale of the atheists and evolutionists.
The "creation scientists," on the other hand, are those who believe in God and they claim that the Universe, the physical constants, DNA, cells, etc. are far too sophisticated to have been created by accidents, thus there must be a God who designed and created all of these things. There are many creation scientists!!
Of course the central issue in the evolution debate is God. The atheists don't want to believe in God so they frequently ask: "where did God come from?" I will tell you what Brigham Young, a contemporary of Darwin, said about this question:
Considering that there are many millions of square miles of sand on this earth (there are more than 5,000,000 square miles of sand on the north pole and more than 5,000,000 square miles of sand on the south pole, plus there are several huge deserts), any ant which tries to count all of the grains of sand would not even remotely live long enough to count a billionth of all the grains of sand on this planet.
God existed long, long, long before the Big Bang (which He no doubt directed) and God has had an eternity to "progress" even before the Big Bang. Our spirits are the children of God and we are late-comers to all that has happened.
Here is an accurate intelligence chart:
This is the intelligence chart claimed by the atheists and evolutionists:
1) Accidents (i.e. evolution) - according to the atheists and evolutionists, accidents are the most intelligent thing in the Universe because they claim that accidents have created DNA and cells for about a million species, and that accidents (e.g. an accidental Big Bang) have created our Universe, Galaxy Clusters, Galaxies, etc. (but humans cannot create any of these things)!!!!
Note that God is not on their intelligence chart!! Accidents are at the top of their intelligence chart!!
Also note that because humans cannot design and create DNA, but accidents can create DNA, that the atheists and evolutionists rate accidents higher on the intelligence chart than they rate humans!!!
The truth is, as this website proves over and over, when an atheists says something like: "evolution designed and created human DNA" they have likely been smoking something that is illegal to smoke. It has damaged their brain.
Note #1: The atheists and evolutionists claim that God does not exist so God is not on their intelligence chart even at number 2,100!!
Note #2: Most religions teach that each human baby has a spirit and perhaps all living things have a spirit. The spirit of the human being would have been created first (i.e. before birth) and the spirit of the new baby, combined with the DNA of the new baby, would work together to morph/create the new baby from a single fertilized egg via many cell divisions!!!! It is likely that most of the intelligence of a human comes from the spirit because before we were even born we had to make incredibly important decisions, in the Grand Council, as to who to follow - Christ or Lucifer!!! If we had not had our pure intelligence at that time (of the Grand Council) it would not have been fair for God to judge us so early in our existence.
Could Human DNA Have Been Created And Sequenced By Accidents?
Let's talk in more detail about creating a human baby. In order to create a human baby it takes three DNA strands plus three cells:
Only one DNA strand from a male sperm cell is used to create a baby, but for humanity to exist both male and female sperm cells are needed, so both lines 1 and 2 are required even though only one of them is normally used for a pregnancy (though 2 could be used for fraternal twins).
Plus the baby will hopefully grow up, via 3.2 billion cell divisions, to become an adult.
This incredible baby was created by the instructions on the DNA inside of a single fertilized egg, followed by 30 billion cell divisions which were controlled by the DNA which existed in the single fertilized egg and is inside of almost every subsequent cell!!!!!! No human can even begin to comprehend the information/computer programs that are built into human DNA!!
Human DNA is by far the most highly sophisticated computer program on this planet because it creates the most sophisticated animal on this earth: a body for a spirit child of God!! We are not children of accidents, we are children of God and God loves each of us.
Yet the atheists and evolutionists, who could not create the DNA of an ant, claim that human DNA was created and its nucleotides were ordered/sequenced purely by a series of accidents!! That is nonsense!!
I sometimes think that the leading atheists and evolutionists have never heard of DNA!! If they have, they certainly don't have a clue how DNA is constructed or the importance and sophistication of the sequence of nucleotides on every DNA strand.
In fact, as is demonstrated on this website in hundreds of different ways, the theory of evolution is complete scientific nonsense that only exists in the minds of those who want to convert people to their religion of atheism.
The bottom line is that because of the discovery of DNA, the sophistication of cells, the physical constants, etc. the theory of evolution has become complete, scientific nonsense.
So Who Wins The Evolution Debate?
Before going into a great deal more detail about why the theory of evolution cannot be true, let us pause and reflect: who wins the evolution debate, the atheists/evolutionists or the creation scientists?
Hundreds of scientists have written pro-evolution books and hundreds of scientists have written anti-evolution books.
In fact, there are many scientists on both sides of the evolution debate!! Many scientists do not believe the claims of the theory of evolution!!
"Creation scientists" are scientists who believe that the Universe and nature are far too sophisticated to have been created by nothing but accidents, so therefore there must be a God.
"Evolutionists," by definition, are atheists who try to scientifically prove that there is no God and thus they claim that everything, from DNA to galaxies, was created by accidents.
The evolution debate is really between a belief in God verses a belief in accidents.
For example, the atheists and evolutionists had to come up with some "accident" which could create our Universe. What "accident" did they come up with - an accidental explosion called the Big Bang.
The Big Bang is not on trial, what is on trial is whether the Big Bang was created by God or by accidents!!
As another example of the need for accidents, the atheists and evolutionists had to come up with some "accident" which could create the physical constants, some of which require unbelievable accuracy. So what did they come up with: the Multiverse theory which claims there have been an infinite number of Universes but only our Universe survived because it just happened to have the right combination of physical constants.
Both an accidental Big Bang and the Multiverse theories are pure nonsense and are nothing but the vain imaginations of atheists and evolutionists.
If there was a Big Bang, and there seems to be plenty of evidence for the Big Bang, any Big Bang would have been a project of God.
The tactics of the atheists and evolutionists are simple: no matter what is discovered in biology or astronomy, the atheists and evolutionists feel the need to dream up some "accident" or "accidents" to explain where everything came from, from DNA to cells to the Universe itself.
This is a very good YouTube video on the many parameters which would have been needed for the creation and fine tuning of the Universe (this is a MUST WATCH YouTube video):
The more a person knows about astronomy the more obvious it is that accidents could not have created the Universe.
Natural SelectionOne of the pillars of the theory of evolution, according to the atheists, is "natural selection."
Scientists claim that natural selection is a key part of evolution. However, natural selection is an ELIMINATION PROCESS. Natural selection eliminates species which already exist (i.e. the strong species eliminate the weak species).
While "natural selection" is a true principle, let me mention that natural selection has nothing to do with creating anything!! Natural selection is purely an elimination process, whereby weak species, which already exist and have DNA, are killed-off by strong species, which also must exist and have DNA!!
Natural selection has absolutely nothing to do with creating new DNA because the two species must exist before one of them eliminates the other. So natural selection has nothing to do with creating a new species!! Well, humans have also eliminated a lot of species.
What person would claim that natural selection could CREATE the DNA for a species!! Well, many atheists and evolutionists make that claim.
In fact, natural selection and evolution work against each other!! Natural selection is trying to destroy existing species so the strong survive and evolution is trying to create new species!!! Natural selection would easily win that battle because it works millions of times faster than creating new DNA by totally random processes (if accidents could create a new species, which they can't)!!!
While no one argues the validity of natural selection, as an elimination process, what people do argue about is the creation of new species, which is known as "evolution" by the atheists and evolutionists. Let me emphasize: the "evolution debate" is not about the elimination of species via NATURAL SELECTION, it is about the creation of new species!!
The problem with natural selection, is that because of the discovery of DNA, it is impossible for any species to exist!!
Thus, natural selection is totally irrelevant to the evolution debate both because there should not be any species to eliminate (because accidents cannot create DNA or sequence the DNA), but even if species could be created by a series of accidents, the only thing that natural selection can do is destroy the weaker species!!
Yet the atheists claim that evolution works BECAUSE OF NATURAL SELECTION!!! How dumb can the scientific establishment be? I frequently wonder about that. But I suspect that their apparent stupidity is self-imposed due to their hatred of God.
This article will go into great detail about why Natural Selection has absolutely nothing to do with evolution:
The Damage Done To Students By The Theory Of Evolution
"Evolutionists" are basically atheists who claim that the scientific evidence indicates there is no God. "Creation Scientists" are those who claim that the Universe, all the way down to the DNA of an ant, are far, far too sophisticated to have happened by a series of accidents (i.e. by evolution). In fact, as is shown on this website, the theory of evolution is scientific nonsense for hundreds of reasons!!
Yet in most middle school, high school and college biology classes, textbooks are used which claim the theory of evolution is a proven scientific fact!! Do the members of the school boards, teachers and the authors of these books not know that DNA was discovered in 1953 and that every cell in your body is vastly more sophisticated than a jet airplane??
While the theory of evolution versus creation science debate is heated, the debate is far more than academic because many students are victims of this battle!! As a result of the teaching of evolution in many schools, countless middle school, high school and college students have lost their belief in God or they may question their belief in God. The damage to students cannot be calculated.
However, the damage can be measured. Studies funded by the Ken Ham group have shown that most of the loss of testimony of God occurs in middle school and high school, not in college!! As Ken Ham would say: "students are already gone by the time they get to college!!"
Nevertheless, when students get to college, if they still have a testimony of God, they may lose it in college!!
Here is a link to the Ken Ham video: "Already Gone - Part 1"
Comments About Using Google For Scientific Research
Most people use Google to do scientific research. But a person doing scientific research needs to understand what Google really is and what it is not!!
This article explains why Google is generally a very poor research tool:
Yet Another Tactic Of The Atheists
Here is one of the problems with the atheists and evolutionists - they want converts. Many of the atheists and evolutionists want students to believe in atheism by using a two-step process.
First, they tell students who are Christians to believe in BOTH atheism (i.e. evolution) and theism (i.e. a belief in God). It is like telling students to believe in God and not believe in God.
What is wrong with that? A lot of things. Most importantly a belief in evolution will severely weaken a person's belief in God!!! In fact, that is precisely one of the goals of the atheists and evolutionists!!
Then they criticize anyone who believes in God as being "old fashion" or "out of touch with science."
By doing these things atheists and evolutionists slowly wean people off of religion and they have a new convert to atheism!!
While the atheists are very bad at science, they are very good at deception and in leading people away from a belief in God!!!
So beware if anyone tells you that it is OK to believe in God and in the theory of evolution. That is not where they want you to end up!!
Can New DNA Be Created From Scratch??
There are two categories if someone claimed that "evolution" (i.e. accidents) created a new species. First, the claim that new species are created from scratch, with their own new DNA, or second, the claim that new species, with new DNA, have DNA which was created by a modification to the DNA of a previously existing species.
First, let's talk about the creation of new DNA from scratch. In order for "evolution" (i.e. "accidents") to create a new species, with brand new DNA, the new species must be created by nothing but accidents, with no intelligence whatsoever involved. Is this logical? Absolutely not!!
Since all animal species begin as a single fertilized egg, with DNA inside of the egg which controls cell divisions, evolution has no choice except to work at the DNA level!!! It is DNA that creates an animal, not the other way around!!
All of the scientists in the world, combined, could not create a new DNA strand from scratch, but even if they could they would have absolutely no ability to order/sequence the nucleotides on the new DNA!!
If evolution were true, and accidents could create massively sophisticated computer programs (like DNA), we could fire all computer programmers and use random number generators to simulate evolution in order to write new computer programs and to enhance old computer programs into new and improved computer programs which have new features!!
This is absurd as any computer programmer knows, yet this is precisely the claim of the atheists and evolutionists!!! Evolution is essentially a random number generator applied to over a million unique DNA strands for over a million unique species, many of which have both male and female DNA which must align in an incredibly sophisticated way!!
And the DNA of each and every animal, plant and insect on this planet is massively most sophisticated than any human-designed computer program on this planet!!!
Can New And Improved DNA (For a New and Improved Species) By Created By Modifications To Old DNA??
Here is the another major issue: can new and improved DNA be created from old DNA, meaning from previously existing DNA?
Unlike the fact that computer programmers can make changes to the source code of a computer program, evolution cannot make changes to a DNA strand!!
DNA cannot be changed - period!!! DNA can only be damaged. So the DNA of one animal cannot physically be changed into the DNA of another animal!! The claim that the DNA of one animal evolved into the DNA of another animal is pure fantasy and indicates a complete failure of the atheists and evolutionists to understand the unbelievably complex physical structure of DNA!!!
Ask a biologist if they have ever created a DNA strand from scratch, even for an ant, meaning from purely raw elements on the Periodic Table. And ask a biologist if they have ever modified an existing DNA strand so the original animal that the original DNA came from has offspring which have new and improved features.
If the person is honest, the answer will be 'no' for three reasons: first, DNA cannot be created from scratch either by humans of accidents, and second, DNA cannot be modified, it can only be damaged. Third, DNA is so sophisticated that even if scientists could modify DNA (which they can't), they would have no clue how to change the sequence of nucleotides on the DNA strand.
Scientists cannot even cut a DNA strand in half (like you would cut a rope in half) and then put the DNA strand back together.
Not only can DNA not be physically changed, even if it could be changed, it would be ludicrous to claim that one massively complex computer program (i.e. the DNA of an animal) could be RANDOMLY CHANGED into a superior computer program (i.e. superior DNA which can create a new and proved species).
But it gets worse. In order to change the DNA of one species into the DNA of another species, many thousands of changes to the DNA would be needed!! To think that accidents could do the impossible - change the DNA strand many thousands of times to create a single new species - is absurd beyond comprehension.
And to claim that this happened to create hundreds of thousands of species, many with a male and female, is even more absurd. If a male and female are involved, the DNA of the male and the DNA of the female would have to have the same changes made in the same timeframe and same latitude and longitude.
Evolution does not have any intelligence plus it does not have any physical abilities to do anything to create and sequence a new DNA strand and it does not have the intelligence to make viable changes to an existing DNA strand in order to make a new and improved DNA strand for a new and improved species!!
Remember, evolution is the dumbest thing in the Universe, evolution cannot even hope that the results of pure, unintended accidents to DNA are favorable (which they NEVER will be).
So how are new species created by evolution?? They aren't, that is my point!!! The theory of evolution is nothing but the fancy imaginations of the atheists and evolutionists who are trying to get converts to atheism!!
Literally, the atheists and evolutionists give "evolution" more intelligence than the intelligence of any team of human beings because all of the scientists on this planet could not design and build new DNA for a new species or design and build new DNA (to create a new species) by modifying the DNA of an existing species!!!!
If humans cannot do it, then accidents certainly cannot do it (if you know anything about cells and DNA) and mathematically insane (if you know anything about the mathematics of permutations in base 4). There is an article on permutations linked to below.
There are over a million species of plants, animals and insects on this planet and each has DNA which is more sophisticated than any computer program ever written by any team of human beings!!
In fact, all of the scientists in the world do not understand the DNA of an ant or the DNA of a cockroach!! And all of the scientists in the world, combined, only understand about 2% of human DNA!!
Human DNA is by far the most sophisticated computer program on earth though it is not the longest DNA strand. Only the DNA of other species can compete with human DNA for sophistication!!
Remember, the one million most sophisticated computer programs on this planet are the one million DNA strands for the roughly one million species on this planet!! And remember that many species have both a male and female.
No human computer program can slip into that list of the world's most sophisticated computer programs (i.e. DNA)!!
Digging Deeper: More On Can New And Improved DNA (For a Species With Male and Female) Be Created From Old DNA??
As a specific example of the claim that new DNA can be created from old/existing DNA, let us assume that evolutionists claimed that human DNA "evolved" directly from the DNA of bonobos. What their actual claims are is not relevant to this discussion, the issue is whether the DNA of one species (e.g. bonobos) can be MODIFIED to create the DNA for a slightly superior species or a massively superior species.
We will not cover the situation where a species which does not have a male and female can "evolve" into a species which has both a male and female (which is itself a major issue with evolution), rather we will discuss the "evolution" of a species with both a male and female into a superior species which has both a male and female.
In order for evolution (i.e. accidents) to create the DNA for a new species, by randomly modifying the DNA of an existing species (which has both a male and female), the accidental changes to the (old) male DNA and the (old) female DNA (as required by the theory of evolution) must be in the same sections of their DNA and the changes must happen in the same generation!!
All of the changes to the DNA do not have to occur in the same generation, but each SUBSET of changes must occur in the same locations and same generation. For example, there could be 50 changes to the male and female in each of 10 consecutive generations (for a total of 500 changes to the male and female). But each subset of 50 changes in each generation must include the same 50 changes.
As an example, the same new genes (male and female) must be in the same sections of their respective DNA so that their offspring (the new species) will have the new section(s) of their DNA from both their mother and father!! This is part of the alignment issues required by evolution.
But not only must the genes and other sections of DNA align between the male and female (as evolution is making changes to the DNA of both the male and female at the same time so the male DNA and female DNA will align with each other at all times), the morphing of the embryo algorithms sections on the DNA of the male and female (Note: this is my terminology for the sections of DNA which control the cell divisions of the baby) must also align because it is the morphing of the embryo algorithms that control the 30 billion cell divisions (in the case of humans) as the new baby is being made!!
By using the term "align" I do not mean that they have the same nucleotides. What I mean is that the FUNCTION of each section must align. For example, the sections of the DNA that contain the gene(s) for eye color, for a male and female, must align, but the eye color of the male and the eye color of the female do not have to be the same.
The alignment of the morphing of the embryo algorithms alone represents an issue so devastating to the theory of evolution that it would destroy the theory of evolution by itself!! For example, with human DNA, and the DNA of many other species, there are two gigantic computer programs (male DNA and female DNA) which are each massively more sophisticated than any human-designed computer program!!! How do these two computer programs align before, during and after the transition from an "old" species to a "new and improved" species??
To make a human baby, these two biological computer programs on two DNA strands (male and female) must align with each other so their offspring have features of both parents. Try doing that with the object code of two different computer programs!!
There is no way that the morphing of the embryo algorithms, on the father's DNA and the mother's DNA, would align with each other after a massive series of accidents (i.e. as "evolution" is trying to improve the DNA to make a new species)!! In addition, these changes must occur in the same timeframe and same location on this earth or the male and female would not find each other as the massive number of accidents (i.e. evolution) were happening.
The "Path" To Human DNA (The Death of the Theory of Evolution)
Let us suppose that from the "first living cell" to human DNA there were 1,000 consecutive intermediate species. Remember, we are only looking at the path of species sequentially between the first living cell and human DNA according to the atheists and evolutionists. All other species are ignored in this section.
The number 1,000 is credible because the length of human DNA is massively longer than the DNA of any theoretical "first living cell."
We will call this sequence of species the "path" concept, meaning the path of microbes and animals between the first living cell and human DNA. In other words, if we saw pictures of every species, sequentially, between the "first living cell" and human DNA, this would be the "path."
As just discussed, DNA cannot be modified, it can only be damaged, and when it is damaged it is useless. The "path" concept is ridiculous when considering that DNA cannot be changed, it can only be damaged. In other words, the path concept is impossible because DNA cannot be modified. Yet, if evolution were true there must be a "path" of species from the "first living cell" to human DNA!!!
Kehr's Paradox #1 and Kehr's Paradox #2
My first college degree from Brigham Young University was in mathematics, so I have a tendency to look at evolution from the perspective of mathematics, especially relative to DNA. Kehr's Paradoxes (yours truly) are mathematical reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true.
The atheists and evolutionists claim that the DNA of an existing species can be modified into the DNA of a new and improved species. In fact, this is the very core of the theory of evolution after the discovery of DNA. Let us ignore the fact that DNA cannot be changed and ponder their claim by assuming that the changes to DNA are made one nucleotide at a time.
Kehr's Paradox #1: If an existing DNA strand is modified enough times, in random locations and with random nucleotides chosen each time, eventually 25% of the nucleotides will be an 'A' and 25% of the nucleotides will be a 'C' and 25% of the nucleotides will be a 'G' and 25% of the nucleotides will be a 'T' and no animal will be created.
Kehr's Paradox #2: If an existing DNA strand is modified enough times, in random locations and with random nucleotides chosen each time, eventually 25% of the nucleotides will be correct nucleotides (to create a predefined specific target DNA strand, such as for a male mouse) and 75% of all nucleotides will be the wrong nucleotide and no animal will be created.
Computer simulations would be the best way to check-out these two paradoxes.
See this article for more information:
An Overview Of Some Key Issues
No matter how much scientific evidence there is against the theory of evolution, most atheists and evolutionists will never accept defeat (some have already switched over)!! So when scientists cannot do something, instead of attribute the DNA, cells and body structure to God, they will always attribute the results to accidents!!
Remember that the theory of evolution is only a concept or belief of the atheists that everything in the Universe came to exist by a "series of accidents!! Actually, it is vastly more wishful thinking on the part of the atheists and evolutionists than it is scientific!!!
The theory of evolution may be a great recruiting tool for the atheists, but it is very, very bad science!!
And how did the "first living cell" come to exist from nothing but rocks, sand and water?? Could scientists create a first living cell, with DNA or RNA inside, from nothing but rocks, sand and water?? Of course not. Hundreds of scientists have PhD degrees in Cell Biology. Cells are not simple!!! There are hundreds of technical terms which are used in the study of Cell Biology!!!
Scientists could not create a cell, with DNA inside of it, which could create a living organism, any more than a team of first grade students could create a space shuttle from scratch. I am not just talking about assembling the space shuttle, but designing and building all of the parts, putting the parts together, creating the fuel, launching the space shuttle and bringing it home safely after hundreds of orbits.
But I should also note that a space shuttle is not alive like a cell is. Scientists have never created life from non-life.
Are you surprised that the "theory of evolution" puts scientists at the top of the intelligence chart in the Universe!! THAT IS THE REAL REASON WHY THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION EXISTS!! Only a scientist who has a giant ego, and/or is horrible at statistics, would claim that the DNA for more than a million species could have been created and sequenced by nothing but accidents!!
A Brief Introduction To Cells
DNA resides inside of cells. In fact, the DNA is critical for the cell.
Hundreds of scientists have PhD degrees in cell biology so cells are not simple!!
Here is a quote by Michael Denton about cells:
An "irreducibly complex system," is by definition, a sequence of complex chemical reactions, such that if any one of the chemical reactions was not there, or failed, the end result of the chemical reaction will fail and the entire cell may be at risk!!!
I would assume that most of these chemical reactions are used to create ATP molecules in the cell. ATP is a key molecule inside every cell. In fact, when something blocks ATP energy, and the cell has low ATP energy, the cell is DEFINED to be cancerous!!
Michael Denton did not say there was one such sequence of chemical chain reactions in cells, but "tens of thousands" of such systems!!!
This is significant because it is one of the many reasons that "evolution" cannot create a cell from scratch!! In other words, all of the chemical chain reactions must be functional at the time the cell is first created because if one or more systems of chemical chain reactions is not there from the beginning, the new cell may not survive!!! Accidents could never create a living cell by accidents!!
In other words, an irreducibly complex chemical chain reaction cannot "evolve" into existence by adding one chemical reaction at a time because each and every chemical chain reaction must be fully functional before the chemical reaction can achieve any benefit to the cell!!"
The Magnitude Of The Problems With The Theory Of Evolution
The above items, and more to come, are just a few of the hundreds of reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true which are discussed on this website.
But I should emphasize that the MAGNITUDE of the reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true is simply beyond comprehension. The permutation issues of the DNA for more than a million species, many with both a male and female, alone would eliminate any chance that the theory of evolution is true. And the construction of DNA is another issue of such magnitude that the theory of evolution simply cannot be true.
Do not look at each reason the theory of evolution cannot be true as being equal with the other reasons. Some reasons are massive enough, by themselves, to make the theory of evolution completely ludicrous!!!
Now I want to make it very clear that many students have been fooled by the atheists and evolutionists. This is nothing to be ashamed of. The atheists have perfected the art of deception, they are well-organized, very well-funded and their deceptions are highly polished!!!
Atheists don't want a God to exist because a God would be massively smarter than they are. So most of them do everything in their vivid imaginations to pretend there is no God and to claim that everything in the Universe came to exist by pure chance. God is replaced by mindless accidents.
What Should A Student Do??
So what should a student do when they realize the theory of evolution is complete scientific nonsense (and I am just beginning)? It is definitely not advisable for a student to argue with their teacher, but there is nothing wrong with a student quietly going "online" and learning the truth about the absurdity of the theory of evolution because of the sophistication of DNA and the sophistication of the cells that the DNA resides inside of, among many other reasons (e.g. the physical constants and the Universe).
This website shows no mercy for the theory of evolution. Why should it? The theory of evolution is pure science fiction!! In fact, this website discusses hundreds of reasons that the theory of evolution cannot be true, meaning hundreds of reasons that accidents could not have created everything in the Universe, including what is on this earth that is not man-made!!
I can assure you that God is not pleased with people who teach that He does not exist!!! God loves His children (that includes you and me). But as our Father, God wants His children to know the truth. And just as importantly, God is a very forgiving God.
Evolution After The "First Living Cell"
Life on this earth had to start with a single cell. So let us first talk about the credibility of the "first living cell" theory as claimed by the atheists and evolutionists:
Evolutionists claim that the DNA of the first human male and the DNA of the first human female "evolved" independently over millions of years, from the same "first living cell," by a series of accidents called "evolution"!!!
How did the DNA of the first human father and the DNA of the first human mother "evolve" together from the "first living cell?" How was their DNA synchronized, species after slightly improved species, as the DNA of the males and females evolved independently for millions of years??
Here is the problem, suppose the male DNA evolved slightly faster than the female DNA evolved. Within many thousands of years of new species, their DNA would not align and they would not have been able to have any children that survived because their DNA was not compatible!!
Male DNA and female DNA had to be designed by God, for each species with a male and female!!. Evolution could never have designed two massively sophisticated computer programs (DNA) that could be integrated together to create a third computer program (a baby). And evolution certainly could not have done it in the same time-frame and same locations on the earth.
Yet the atheists claim that evolution created male and female DNA for many species that have both a male and female. They must claim the male and female DNA "evolved" over the same time period (so they could mate as they slowly evolved over many generations) and they had to live in the same geographical area (also required so they could mate).
But the truth is that it does not matter what is discovered in cell biology, DNA analysis, etc. because no matter what is discovered, the atheists will either ignore it or give evolution the credit!!
The evolution debate is not about science, it is about God. If you assume God does not exist, or if you believe God does not exist, you will likely believe in the theory of evolution no matter how absurd it is.
Unfortunately, many people who believed in God have been tricked into believing in evolution. In fact, that is the precise purpose of the highly sophisticated deceptions of the atheists and evolutionists (and I have only talked about a few of their deceptions) and why it is taught in most schools, but not all schools. In some schools, "creation science" or "intelligent design" is taught and in other schools there are disclaimers about evolution.
Biology is no longer about science, it is about creative thinking as to how every discovery can be attributed to the theory of evolution in order to get more converts to atheism. Atheists are not interested in truth, they are only interested in getting converts to atheism.
One of the key deceptions of the atheists and evolutionists, to get converts, is their definition of the term "species." They define the term "species" in such a way that each "variety" of dog is a different "species." To them a Chihuahua and a Great Dane are different "species." This gives them the latitude to claim that they have observed a new "species" form. But if the term "unique species" is defined to be a "unique DNA structure" then they have never seen a new "species" be created. Nor will they ever see a new species be created by accident or by human breeding of animals.
The atheists and evolutionists don't like to talk about DNA, they like to tell stories and use deception, such as by using very clever deceptive definitions.
Seven chapters in one of the free eBooks on this website are devoted to deceptive definitions.
In addition, the atheists must claim the entire Universe was created by accident!! How could the atheists and evolutionists claim that the entire Universe was created by accident instead of by God? Well, they had to come up with some "accident" that they claimed could create the Universe, including the superclusters of clusters of galaxies. So the atheists invented the concept of a purely accidental "Big Bang." They want you to believe that an accidental explosion (remember, it had to be an accident) created the Universe. I don't think so.
It gets worse. What about the incredible "physical constants." Some of the 300+ physical constants have to be unbelievably accurate or our Universe could not exist!! How did the atheists deal with that impossible subject??
To explain how the physical constants came to exist by accident, one of the most famous atheists came up with the concept of "multiverse," and claimed that there were an infinite number of Universes (i.e. an infinite number of Big Bangs), but all of them failed to create a viable Universe because they did not have the right combination of physical constants. Well, all of them failed except ours, which just happened to have the right combination of physical constants.
You have to admire the atheists and evolutionists for their creative thinking!! But creative story-telling, and hundreds of PhDs, does not imply truth. In fact, it doesn't matter what is discovered, the vivid imaginations of the atheists and evolutionists can generate a story for every scientific fact!!
Comparing DNA to Computer Programs
The evolution debate made a dramatic change when DNA was discovered in 1953!! Scientists now had to explain how DNA came to exist by a series of accidents!!
Today it is obvious that a single fertilized egg contains the instructions to create a baby animal, even humans, via millions or billions of cell divisions!! However, scientists don't have the SLIGHEST CLUE how DNA can create a new baby via millions or billions of cell divisions!!!
We can compare human DNA to a computer program, though human DNA is vastly more sophisticated than any computer program ever written by humans.
If evolution were true, computer programmers would not be needed because random number generators (i.e. evolution or accidents) could create the source code or object code for every new computer program on earth!!
Furthermore, to create a new and improved computer program from an existing computer program; all you would need to do is apply a random number generator to the source code or object code of the old computer program. This process should work every time if evolution is true because there is no evidence of failures of the "accidents" of evolution!!
But random number generators could NEVER create the source code or object code for a new computer program, nor could random number generators modify the souce code or object code of an existing viable computer program and create a new computer program with new features!!
Any computer programmer who was told to write new source code or object code for a new computer program (or to improve an existing computer program) with random number generators, would just laugh at the idea. Yet this same computer programmer may believe in the theory of evolution because he/she does not understand what DNA does.
It is now known that human DNA is like the "object code" of a massively complex computer program. But there is no "source code" and there is no compiler.
To demonstrate this with bar charts, see one of the chapters in one of the free eBooks on this website. This chapter is a series of bar graphs which prove, beyond any doubt, that accidents cannot create a viable DNA strand. And these bar charts do not even discuss the physical construction of DNA!! Click:
The term "evolution" in the time of Charles Darwin and the term "evolution" today mean totally different things because Darwin knew almost nothing about cells and he knew nothing about DNA!!! Darwin only saw the visual form of animals.
Can the atheists and evolutionists explain how accidents created the DNA for more than a million species by a series of pure, undirected accidents?? Absolutely Not!!
What Computer Programming Can Teach Us About Evolution
We have already talked about the problems with creating a new species from an old species by mentioning that existing DNA cannot be modified. But there are other reasons a new species cannot be created from an old species even if DNA could be modified.
Let us compare the claim that a new species can be created from an old species to the computer language C#.
When writing or changing a computer program in C# there are three steps:
Now suppose that a perfectly good C# computer program needed a major upgrade to add a new feature to the program. There are two options to make the changes:
No computer programmer on this planet would choose the second option!! It would be a waste of time and would totally destroy the old program and it would not have any new or old features that worked!!!
Yet Option #2 is precisely the way that evolution must work!!! There is no "source code" for DNA, there is only "object code" on the DNA. Evolution can only RANDOMLY change the DNA via random mutations!! Yet the atheists and evolutionists claim that the DNA of a perfectly good species can be randomly mutated (by evolution) and the random mutations will create a new and improved species EVERY TIME!!!
This is nonsense because DNA includes computer programs vastly more sophisticated than any computer program ever written by any team of human beings!!! And the DNA only contains the object code!!
With the discovery of DNA the evolution debate should have left the domain of biologists and been put under the domain of statisticians looking at DNA. But that will never happen because there are many atheists who need the theory of evolution to sell their books and get new converts to atheism!!
In addition to things on this earth, scientists also cannot create a single sun from scratch. And is it logical to think that our sun and all of the stars (e.g. the supergiant star VY Canis Majoris), galaxies, superclusters of galaxies, etc. in the Universe came to exist by an accidental explosion called the Big Bang?
It is absurd to claim that accidents created all DNA, all cells, all stars, all galaxies, etc. But these claims will never go away because the atheists and evolutionists will always be looking for converts. But the truth is that the claims of the atheists are complete scientific nonsense.
The prophets, past and present, are absolutely correct: God is the source of all DNA, cells, galaxies, etc.
The Current Evolution Versus Creation Science Debate
The evolution debate should not be based on the visual forms of plants and animals (i.e. Darwin's phylogenetic tree), but rather it should be based on the probability that the DNA of the plants and animals (and the cells the DNA resides in) came to exist PURELY BY CHANCE (i.e. by the totally random accidents of evolution)!!
But what massively sophisticated computer program, and human DNA is the most sophisticated computer program on this planet, has ever come to exist by a long series of pure accidents?
Every DNA strand is claimed to have been created by accident and every computer program has been written by computer programmers (and the compilers were written by humans and the operating systems were written by humans), yet EVERY DNA strand is far more sophisticated than EVERY computer program!!
Suppose you were a spy and you were told by your country to steal the instructions of how to manufacture a certain kind of automobile. Would you take a photograph of the automobile or would you steal the schematics of the machines in the factory that made the automobile?? Obviously you would steal the schematics of the machines.
Likewise, debating the theory of evolution by looking at the visual forms of plants and animals is not scientific because it totally misses the root cause of why the plants and animals exist, which is DNA!!
The fact is that without DNA there would be no plants and no animals.
To be more specific, plants and animals are created by the computer algorithms which are on the DNA of the plants and animals. So looking at the visual form of a plant and animal is NOT looking at what causes the plant or animal to exist!!
Needless to say the atheists and evolutionists don't like to talk about DNA or cells, they like to talk about the visual form of each plant and animal so they can tell their stories. They carefully ignore the fact that computer programs in the human world are never written by random number generators, but evolution itself is essentially a random number generator applied to DNA!! Without God there is nothing but total randomness in nature.
The key question in the evolution debate is this: knowing that the "computer programs" on DNA in nature are vastly more sophisticated than any "human-designed computer program," how could the "computer programs" on DNA, for more than a million species have been "written" by totally random processes?
As will be seen many times on this website, when DNA is looked at during the evolution debate, the theory of evolution becomes scientific nonsense. By definition, there is "no intelligence" in the theory of evolution, especially at the DNA level.
The only "evidence" the evolutionists have for their theory is to ignore DNA and look only at the visual form of plants and animals and then combine the visual form of plants and animals with their exceptional story-telling skills.
Once DNA enters into the evolution debate the theory of evolution quickly collapses because all DNA is a massively sophisticated computer program, even for an ant.
Cell Biology (The Sophistication of Cells)
Suppose you were on a hike deep in the forest and you had not seen any sign of civilization for several hours. Suppose as you came over one hill you saw, what looked like to you, a brand new Buick automobile with its engine running and its headlights on and its hazard lights flashing.
Would you think that this "object" was created by an explosion in a forest?? Of course not. A forest is made of dirt, trees, shrubs, rocks, etc. You would know that what you were looking at was vastly too sophisticated to have been created by an explosion in the forest.
Yet, every cell in your body is massively more sophisticated than any automobile ever made!! To say that any cell was created by a series of accidents is ludicrous. Yet all plants, animals and insects are made from a collection of cells and each of those cells is more sophisticated than a Buick!!
In fact, all of the scientists on this planet could not create a single cell, even without the DNA that is inside of almost all cells. Nor could they create the many other things which are inside the cell that are part of the continuous activities going on inside of almost every cell. Nor could they figure out how to make a cell divide into two cells, including copying the Golgi Apparatus, for example.
Hundreds of scientists have PhD degrees in Cell Biology, so cells are not simple!! The large textbook Essential Cell Biology, Third Edition, has 8 authors and 730 pages plus many pages of other information!! The Glossary has 596 definitions!!! Cells are clearly not simple!!
By the way, the term "species" was not even defined in the book!! The term should be defined thusly: "a unique species is determined by a unique DNA structure." But if the atheists and evolutionists used this definition, the theory of evolution would crumble to the ground. This is precisely what so many atheists tap dance around a definition of "species."
Another textbook on Cell Biology is called: The World Of The Cell, Fourth Edition, by Becker, Kleinsmith and Hardin. This textbook is 845 pages. The term "species" does not show up in the Index.
There are clearly at least 100 reasons the theory of accidents cannot be true due to the sophistication of cells; and this does not include the many issues created purely by the DNA in almost all cells!! In fact, I own two books on this very issue (and I am sure there are other books on this topic):
These two men are obviously "creation scientists," meaning they believe that God had to create the many species on this earth because they could not have been created by accidents.
What is Life?
Let us look at the issue: "what is life?" For example, if you took a fish and left it out of the water until it died, and then an hour later you put it back into the water, why doesn't it come back to life? All of the raw elements for life are still in the fish, so why doesn't it come back to life? There is something more to "life" than just cells and oxygen and water.
Furthermore, have the evolutionists and atheists ever proven that life can be created from non-life (i.e. inorganic materials)?? Never, never, never - yet they continue to preach atheism.
While several attempts have been made to create life from non-life (e.g. Miller-Uray, Wong and Hartgerink), the scientists have not only failed to create life, they have also failed to prove it can be done. They cannot create a DNA strand from inorganic material, much less a DNA strand with a viable permutation of nucleotides for life which is inside of a cell!!
For example, have scientists put a large shell over a pond, which had no life, meaning there was no DNA and no cells (this simulates "prebiotic," meaning "existing before life"), and observed "life" form by a series of accidents, including RNA or DNA inside of a "first living cell" (in that pond), that was alive and had the ability to divide itself into two cells (which would be required for life to continue)?
Then what is their evidence for evolution? Their only evidence is that many scientists do not believe in God and thus they have no choice except to use their God-given brains to deceive people into believing that everything in the Universe, including human DNA, occurred by chance.
But the theory of evolution should have been thrown in the trash can when DNA was discovered and when the complexity of cells was also discovered. Yet, as scientists learn more and more about DNA and cells, the atheists continue to cling to the theory of evolution as if it were still 1859, when Darwin's first book was published.
The only thing that is "evolving" on this planet is the theory of evolution as evolutionists/atheists constantly need to develop new spin to account for the new discoveries about the sophistication of cells, the morphing of the embryo algorithms on DNA, etc.
Can Accidents Or Simplicity Create Complexity?
As one example of complexity, the human eyes are unbelievable in complexity. Yet the sections on human DNA which create the human eyes must be far more complex than the eyes themselves!! And the intelligence who designed the DNA (God) must be far more complex than the DNA itself!!
In other words, simplicity never creates complexity. To understand these concepts, consider these items:
First, consider that a human-designed computer program exists because of the human intelligence to write the computer program, the human intelligence to write the computer language, the human intelligence to write the computer language compiler, the human intelligence to design and build the microprocessor, including designing and building the memory chips, etc.
Second, consider the output of the computer program which is printed on a piece of paper.
How can the printout on the piece of paper be more sophisticated than the human intelligence needed to write the computer program, to write the computer language, etc.?? It can't!!
Let's think about the memory chips. I have a son who works for a company that makes memory chips. At times he is sitting in a very large room by himself, with several billion dollars worth of equipment needed to make memory chips!!
The memory chips cannot be more complex than the machines that made them, and the machines that made them cannot be more complex than the humans who designed them!!
Simplicity cannot create complexity!!
Consider the sophistication of DNA such that it creates a person's brain. Let us think about a pianist.
A pianist must be able to convert thousands on dots on a sheet of music into the movements of their fingers!! To do this the DNA must create the nerves between their eyes and their brain, have the brain process these dots and then the brain controls their fingers. And the DNA must create the muscles on their fingers, etc.
If all of this is in place, and with thousands of hours of practice, a pianist can play the Rachmaninoff Piano Concerto #3!!
What created our DNA, which in turn created our brain, had to be far, far smarter than our DNA and our brain!!!
That would be God.
Accidents (i.e. evolution) have zero intelligence so how could accidents create something with intelligence? They can't!! Intelligence is a top-down process and someone a lot smarter than humans had to design human DNA and the DNA for every one of the million-plus species on this planet, many of which have a male and female.
Could accidents or monkeys design and build a Buick automobile? Of course not. It takes a lot of intelligence, including many different specialties, to build a Buick automobile. Only humans can build an automobile. Likewise, only God could create the DNA for more than a million species of plants and animals.
Where Did The "First Child" For A New Species Come From?
See the "Seventh" reason in this article to understand why DNA cannot be changed:
Here is an article on the topic of who were the first humans born on this planet:
Where Did God Come From? (Two Articles)
The truth is that God had to exist long before our Universe was created and our sun was created and this planet was prepared for earth life. So people naturally want to know where God came from!!
Brigham Young, who was born in 1801 (Darwin was born in 1809), the second prophet of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (the Mormons), said this about the first cause of all things (i.e. where God came from):
In other words, there was a "First Cause" of all things - a beginning - but this beginning happened so long ago, and so many quadrillions of things have happened since then, that these events are far, far beyond human comprehension.
By the way, the largest desert on this planet is 5.5 MILLION SQUARE MILES in size (the Antarctica Polar Desert)!! The Arctic Polar Desert is 5.4 MILLION SQUARE MILES in size!!
There are a lot of grains of sand on this planet for the ant to count!!
If Brigham Young had known these two facts, and other facts about deserts, I doubt he would have changed his statement.
While Brigham Young did not know very much about the Universe in his day, he did understand the principle that the "first cause of all things" is beyond human comprehension.
Brigham Young also said this about God:
There are two articles for this topic:
First, for many quotes about God, see this amazing article:
Second, this article is specifically about where God and the Universe came from:
A Summary and Overview Of Some Key Issues
So far we have barely touched the surface of the reasons evolution cannot be true, yet even at this point we have no logical choice except to conclude that God exists. Different religions may have different beliefs about God, but there is no choice except to say that God does exist. In the Mormon religion (the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints) there are three separate Gods in the Godhead. The head God (Heavenly Father), the Savior (Jesus Christ) and the Holy Ghost.
If scientists are so smart, and believe that God does not exist, can they create a Universe with a planet like Earth that has more than a million species, many of which have both a male and female? Let's think about it.
What is the difference between "creating" a brand new Buick versus "destroying" a brand new Buick by driving it over a cliff??
The difference is that the new Buick being driven off the cliff must have been created before it was driven over a cliff.
How does driving a Buick over a cliff help explain how the Buick got created in the first place?? It doesn't.
So how does finding the remains of an extinct animal (i.e. its fossil) tell us how it was created?? It doesn't. All it tells us is that this animal used to be alive, but now it is dead.
An animal must be alive before it is dead. A fossil does not tell us how an animal was created, it only tells us that the animal is dead.
But even extinct animals had to have DNA and their DNA had to create them either from an enclosed egg (e.g. a chicken egg) or a fertilized egg (e.g. humans or monkeys).
Every animal on this planet, including humans, came from a single DNA strand which was inside of an egg. Whether they came from an enclosed egg (i.e. a chicken egg) or a single fertilized egg in a mother, the animal (including humans) came from a single object and then morphed over time into what it was when it was young and eventually died.
So the evolution debate is not about where bones came from, it is about where DNA came from. How did "morphing of the embryo" algorithms come to exist for many, many complex species, especially when there is a male and female in the species?
The evolution debate is therefore about statistics. There are so many past and present highly sophisticated DNA strands for both extinct and living animals that the theory of evolution has become ludicrous.
But it is not just about the creation of DNA, it is also about viable permutations of nucleotides on DNA. Even if DNA could be built, the probability it has a viable permutation to create an animal from a single cell is mathematically insane.
It is far beyond the scope of this home page to talk about many subjects. But trust me: the probability of a viable permutation of nucleotides, to create both a male and female for a single advanced species (the permutation of nucleotides on the DNA would have to be almost perfect in order to perform the morphing of the embryo for both a male and female offspring), etc. is so ludicrous it could not happen a single time in the estimated age of this Universe or a billion consecutive Universes.
In summary, here are just a few reasons evolution (i.e. accidents) could never have created human beings:
But even if scientists could create a cell from scratch, would their "new cell" be alive? The answer is 'no' because scientists don't have a clue what "life" really is.
So how did evolution create a living cell, with DNA or RNA inside, with a viable permutation, with the mechanisms to use the DNA patterns, by pure accident?? Accidents don't create intelligence, just ask any computer programmer how long it would take to write a complex computer program using code written exclusively by random number generators. It would never happen.
So if humans cannot design and create from scratch DNA or RNA, plus a cell for the DNA or RNA to exist inside, and give their new cell "life," with a viable permutation of nucleotides, why would anyone believe that a series of pure accidents (i.e. evolution) could have created the "first living cell" in a sterile pond?
The atheists and evolutionists are great story tellers but they are complete dolts at having a credible explanation of where everything came from.
Many reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true are mentioned in various other articles on this website, such as the "Twenty-Five Reasons The Theory of Evolution Cannot Be True" article.
The Evolution Debate
While there are more than 350 books which are favorable to the theory of evolution there are also more than 350 books which are strongly critical of the theory of evolution!!
There are also many YouTube videos on both sides of the debate.
Those who are critical of the theory of evolution are called "creation scientists" or "creationists" because they believe the scientific data favors a "Creator" of the Universe.
In fact, if you want to get published in a leading biology journal you better be an atheist and your article better support the theory of evolution. If it does not praise evolution your article will end up in the trash can, not in a "science" journal.
From the incomprehensible sophistication of DNA, to the amazing complexity of cells, to the earth we live on, to the ends of the Milky Way Galaxy, to the furthest galaxy cluster and supercluster (by the way, the supercluster we live in is called the Laniakea Supercluster), and considering the "constants" in physics (e.g. the gravitational constant); the credibility of the theory of evolution has dropped to ABSOLUTE ZERO!!!
Note: In order to prevent this home page from becoming massively too big, some topics, which would normally be put on the home page, have been moved to their own article.
Detailed Articles On Special Topics
Article: Permutations - The Ultimate Death Of The Theory of Evolution
This article uses more advanced mathematics to demonstrate the total absurdity of the theory of evolution.
If evolution could create a new DNA strand i(which it can't), evolution could only RANDOMLY sequence the nucleotides on any DNA strand for a new species. But the vast, vast, vast percent of permutations would not create any type of animal at all!! For example, some of the permutations would create deformed animals that cannot survive.
So where are the countless dead animals which evolution could not quite create?? There are none because the theory of evolution is nonsense.
Article: The Damage Done To Youth, And Others, By The Theory of Evolution
The theory of evolution debate is not a purely academic/theoretical debate. The evolution debate can generate permanent and severe damage to the beliefs in God of both youth and adults. In fact, some people intentionally want to do permanent damage to the beliefs of others!!! Do not for one second think that the theory of evolution debate is purely academic!! This article discusses the damage that can be done by the teachings of the theory of evolution and links to YouTube videos on this subject:
Article: Fifteen Reasons The Theory of Evolution Cannot Be True
While there are hundreds of reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true, this article is a list of fifteen of the best reasons evolution cannot be true plus this article digs much deeper into the DNA issues which destroy the theory of evolution. This article will open as a new window:
Article: Twenty Reasons Evolution Cannot Be True
This article was written at a different time than the "Fifteen Reasons" artcle so it has a little overlap, but is generally different. This article will open as a new window:
Article: Twenty-Five Reasons Evolution Cannot Be True
This article was written independently from the Fifteen Reasons and Twenty Reasons articles so it is a significantly different list. This article will open as a new window:
Article: More Than Four-Hundred Reasons Why The Theory of Evolution Cannot Be True
Here is a list of more than 400 reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true. In each category one or more items are flagged that represent a significant reason evolution could not have happened by a series of accidents. This article will open as a new window:
Article: A Focus On Human DNA
This article has three sections which talk more about human DNA and why the discovery of DNA has eliminated any possibility that the theory of evolution is true:
Article: The Sixteen Cells Mystery
Hold on to your seatbelt, it is not just the computer programs on the DNA that control the "morphing of the embryo" that are incomprehensible, it is the way that the morphing algorithms work!! There is no computer program on this planet that could be designed to work the way the "morphing of the embryo" algorithms work.
Here is an article that traces the "morphing of the embryo" until there are 16 cells in the fetus. This article demonstrates that DNA should not even be called a computer program. In this article you will learn why no team of computer programmers on earth could even begin to replicate the way that DNA works!!!
Article: The Hidden Agenda Of Atheists
There is far more to the theory of evolution than just a claim that there is no God. As this article shows, the real agenda of the theory of evolution turns out to be a mirror-image of the Gospel of Jesus Christ!!
Article: The Theory of Evolution Is A Religion!!!
The theory of evolution and atheism are identical!!! They are both religions of atheism.
This article goes into detail about how the leading evolutionists are atheists and their doctrines are designed to lead people to beome atheists!!
Woody Allen, Stephen Hawking, Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, etc. are all atheists who tout the theory of evolution as valid science so they can get converts to atheism!!
Article: The Use Of Clever Definitions
There is absolutely no scientific evidence to justify the theory of evolution. So what do the atheists and evolutionists do to generate bogus "evidence" for the theory of evolution??
One way is the use of very, very clever definitions, also known as "deceptive definitions." By using clever definitions the atheists and evolutionists can create "evidence" for the theory of evolution out of thin air, so to speak.
In other words, they can use a scientific fact which has absolutely nothing to do with the creation of new DNA (which is required for evolution to be true) and like a magician they can create imaginary evidence for the theory of evolution.
This article goes into more depth on this issue:
Article: The Complexity of Cells (and 3 YouTube Videos)
There is human DNA inside of every cell (except some red blood cells), but human DNA is not the only highly sophisticated object inside the cells. There are many other complex objects, some of which were created by the genes on the DNA. Cells are unbelievably complex!!
In the book: Essential Cell Biology, Third Edition, a section header on page 410 reads: Transmitter-gated Channels in Target Cells Convert Chemical Signals Into Electrical Signals." This is not something you read in the comic section of the newspaper.
Cells could not have been created by a series of accidents!!
For more information about the complexity of cells, see this article:
Article: Could a Simple Cell Exist?
Evolutionists understand the problems with creating a human cell from scratch, so they claim that the "first living cell" was a simple cell and that numerous increasingly complex types of cells "evolved" between the "first living cell" and human cells.
First of all, there are no "simple cells." Even the simplest cell on this earth has DNA (except for some red blood cells, however, there is no way these red blood cells can divide!!) and inside each cell is also an incredible, miniature factory.
For more information about whether a simple cell could exist, see this article:
Article: Comparing DNA to Computer Programs
Ponder this carefully: every one of the millions of complex, or even moderately complex, computer programs on this planet was written by human beings. NONE OF THEM were written by random number generators to simulate the way that evolution must work!!! Every computer program has been written by intelligent human beings who studied computer languages and programming!!
This article logically compares the existence of DNA to writing computer programs and explains why DNA could not have come to exist by accidents:
Article: Why Do We Need Computer Programmers??
The DNA for more than a million different species are vastly superior to any computer program written by any team of computer programmers!!
So if randomness (i.e. evolution) created all of the most sophisticated computer programs on earth (i.e. DNA) then randomness should also be able to design the far, far less sophisticated computer programs used by businesses, the military, individuals, etc.
This article provides another viewpoint to the evolution debate:
Article:Permutations - The Ultimate Death Of The Theory of Evolution
This article goes into much more detail about why permutations of nucleotides are among the ultimate deaths of the theory of evolution.
The permutation issue is so bad for the theory of evoultion that there literally would not be a single species, on this planet, or in the Universe, if there were not a God to design DNA.
Article: Pride Is The Driving Force Of The Theory of Evolution
This article details exactly why the theory of evolution exists!! The answer is pride. Many atheists and evolutionists cannot stand to think that someone might be smarter than they are, much less MASSIVELY smarter than they are!!
Article: What Did Darwin Know?
Charles Darwin knew nothing about cells and he knew nothing about the DNA inside of those cells. In fact, based on what scientists knew in Darwin's day, the data that Darwin had access to fully supported his theory of evolution!! It was not until 1953, with the discovery of DNA, that Darwin's theories could be disproven!!
This article is actually in defense of Darwin based on what scientists knew in his day!!
Article: A Challenge To The Atheists and Evolutionists
The atheists and evolutionists claim that all DNA can be created by a series of accidents either from scratch or by the modification of an existing DNA strand.
This article poses a challenge to the atheists and evolutionist to prove their theories are credible:
The Two Free eBooks On This Website
Chapter Summary: Medium-size eBook (37 pages, pdf file): Patterns of Intelligence - Chapter Summary
If you want a quick, high level overview of the Patterns of Intelligence book, this article has a short summary of each chapter in the 266 page medium-size this book:
Technical Medium-Size eBook: (266 pages, pdf file): Patterns of Intelligence
While the large book on this website is the "B-2 Bomber" of anti-evolution books, this book is the "F-22 Raptor" of anti-evolution books. This free book is actually much more current on the issues of the great scientific deceptions which are going on and the mathematical reasons evolution cannot be true. However, it does not go into the depth of the long book on the mathematical reasons evolution cannot be true.
Did you know that if you listed all major LDS doctrines (i.e. Latter-Day Saint or Mormon) and then took the opposite of each of these doctrines you would end up with the theory of evolution doctrines!! This book will produce such a detailed list in Chapter 2.
In this book you will see one of the main arguments of the large book, called "Patterns of Intelligence." This eBook has some really cool graphs.
But there are many things in the medium size book which are not in the large book. For example, chapters 22 and 23 of this book contain an amazing discussion which demonstrates that there is nowhere near enough information on DNA to control the "morphing of the embryo" algorithms!! Either God Himself designed DNA (and we cannot even remotely understand it) or the morphing of the embryo has help from the other side of the veil. There is no other option!!
Here is a link to the medium-sized book in one file. As always, you are welcome to read it online, download it, or print it out:
Here is a link to the individual chapters in the medium-sized book. Each chapter is a file so it is easy to focus on one chapter at a time:
Technical Long eBook: (407 pages, pdf file): Prophets or Evolution - An LDS Perspective
This book is the "B-2 Bomber" of anti-evolution books. It demolishes the theory of evolution time after time and takes no enemies. The discovery of DNA has created an avalanche of ways to prove the theory of evolution is scientific nonsense.
This free eBook is available in both HTML and PDF formats and both versions can be looked at online or can be downloaded. For example, you can download the PDF version and print it out so you can mark it up. As always, you don't even need to tell me you downloaded it!!
The long eBook is called "Prophets or Evolution - An LDS Perspective," which:
The book in HTML format (by chapter):
A printable version of the entire book (407 pages) is available in pdf format and can be read or downloaded from this link. It can also be printed out:
Chapter of Long Book: "Seven Scientific Reasons ... Evolution Cannot be True"
The complete "Prophets or Evolution" book is over 400 pages. This is a link to one of the key chapters in the main eBook. This chapter is a high level overview of seven of the main scientific reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true. It also mentions seven other reasons evolution cannot be true. Here is a link to this chapter:
Other Anti-Evolution BooksIf you listen to the propaganda of the pro-evolution monopoly you might think that anyone who believes in creation science is a dolt. Nothing could be further from the truth. There are many "creation scientists" (i.e. those who believe God created this Universe) who are brilliant and have no problems seeing through the false science generated by the scientific establishment.
In fact, many anti-evolution books have been written by brilliant scientists. This listing of anti-evolution books and DVDs contains only a small sampling of the anti-evolution books which exist in print. In fact, there are more than 200 anti-evolution books.
Many of the books were written by PhDs in the sciences. The arguments in these books totally shred the theory of evolution from a scientific standpoint.
Some of these books may be out of print and you may have to use a book finder, such as Alibris, to find them.
Here is a link to this appendix:
Additional Section For Latter-Day Saints (i.e. Mormons) And The General Public
NOTE: Not all links below are to this website.
If you live in Utah, Idaho, Nevada, Arizona, Wyoming or New Mexico, please do me a favor. Have one of your children (or you) find out the name and authors of the biology textbook which is being used in their middle school and high school. Then send me the city and state, and the name of the book(s) along with the names of the authors. The authors names are important because many biology books have the same title, such as "Biology." I need to know what is actually being taught in these states for future reference.
Also, if you could find out whether this book is used statewide or whether each school district gets to pick their own textbook on Biology.
My email address is at the bottom of this page. Thanks In Advance!!
The rest of this section for Latter-Day Saints provides key information for the youth and adults.
Article: The First Book To Describe the Theory of Evolution Was NOT Written By Darwin
Most people think that Darwin wrote the first book to describe the theory of evolution. Actually, the Book of Mormon described the theory of evolution, including natural selection, about 29 years before Darwin's first book on evolution was published. The Book of Mormon actually has two sets of versus which discuss the theory of evolution and in both cases the Book of Mormon is not at all supportive of those who teach the theory of evolution. In other words, in both cases the Book of Mormon was very, very critical of those who teach the theory of evolution even before the theory of evolution existed!!
Article: Where Did God Come From? (Two Articles)
The classic discourse on the origin of God, and the Grand Council, is the "King Follett Discourse" given by Joseph Smith not long before he was martyred. Here is a link to this article:
While no one knows exactly where God came from, this article will dig into the subject based on what we have been told by the prophets, both ancient and modern (this article also has a link to the King Follett Discourse).
Article: Prophetic Book of Mormon Warnings
This short article goes into more detail about prophets and evolution than what I just mentioned. However, if you plan on reading the Patterns of Intelligence book mentioned below, which is over 260 pages long, it is not necessary to read this article.
Spreadsheet: Alma 30: Doctrines of Korihor and Evolution
As a support to the above article, this spreadsheet shows the vast differences between what Korihor taught (i.e. what evolution teaches) and LDS doctrine. This spreadsheet goes verse by verse in Alma chapter 30 and explains the similarities between the teachings of Korihor and the doctrines of the theory of evolution. It also shows how each is the opposite of LDS doctrine (a link may open on the bottom-left corner of your screen - if so click the link):
Two Articles: The Grand Council and the War In Heaven (Bible and LDS)
Long, long before any of us were born on this planet, we were alive and well in a giant meeting called the "Grand Council." It was at this meeting that satan (i.e. Lucifer) and his followers were cast out to become the devil and his angels. It was also at this meeting that the prophets, and many others, were chosen to perform their main duties on this planet.
In other words, long before Adam and Eve were put on this earth there was a war in heaven between the forces of Christ and the forces of Lucifer, who would later become "the devil."
This article is about the Grand Council, which all of us attended:
This article goes into detail about the war in heaven that determined who would be born on this planet and who would not!!
Article: Why The Confusion About Evolution?
The intentional deceptions of evolutionists, by the use of clever terminology, are why there is such a wide diversity of opinions about evolution among LDS scientists. Very few members of the church understand the sophistication of the deceptions of the scientific establishment.
While these discussions are also in the Patterns of Intelligence book, if you want a quick lesson in understanding the deceptive definitions used by the scientific establishment, this article is for you.
Statement: The 1909 Official Statement of the First Presidency of the LDS Church
The 1909 statement of the First Presidency on the theory of evolution remains the official document of the church on the theory of evolution. This statement in 1909 was reprinted in the 2002 Ensign. It remains not only the official doctrine of the church, but the best description of the origin of man outside of the scriptures!! It is highly, highly recommended to the reader to study this document very carefully!!! It is unlike anything else you can read on the subject of evolution!!
Here is a link to this magnificent article:
Here is a 14 page article with my comments about the 1909 and 1910 statements of the First Presidency. My comments focus of the relationship between the statements of the First Presidency and what scientists knew between 1909 and 1953:
Booklet: True To the Faith (First Presidency)
In addition to the 1909 article, an official booklet issued by the First Presidency in 2004: True to the Faith - A Gospel Reference, while not specifically about evolution, describes church doctrines which are the very antithesis of the doctrines of the theory of evolution (e.g. See topics: Atonement of Jesus Christ; Creation; Fall; God the Father; etc.). This booklet is available on www.lds.org:
Talk: The Nature of God!! (Talks by Elder Jeffrey R. Holland)
What kind of being is God?? To those who fear they may have sinned beyond the range of the atonement, there is a magnificent message in this general conference talk about the true nature of God!!
In this conference talk Elder Holland gives us a feel for the love of God towards us.
Talk: The Prophetic Future of the LDS Church (Talk by President Spencer W. Kimball)
Do you want to know the future of the LDS church? A general conference talk by President Spencer W. Kimball provides a clear vision of what the future of the LDS church will be.
Talk: The False Gods We Worship (Article by President Spencer W. Kimball)
This classic article by President Spencer W. Kimball explains about the false gods some members of the church (and to some degree all of us) worship. Its lesson applies directly to the youth of the church!!
Talk: Beware of the Evil Behind the Smiling Eyes (Talk by Elder Neil L. Anderson)
Many attempts to lead the youth of the church astray are made by those who appear to be harmless or even friendly. This talk by Elder Neil L. Anderson, of the Quorum of the Twelve, is a warning to the youth of the church about those with "smiling eyes" who are not who they claim to be.
Article: TWO WARNINGS By God To Those Who Teach And Preach The Theory of Evolution
This article explains the importance of the youth of the church to Heavenly Father. It also issues a dreadful warning to those who, for profit, use the theory of evolution to try and lead the youth of the church away from a belief in God:
Quotes: The Power of God and the Future of the Church
These two articles contains quotes from the scriptures and from the living prophets and apostles about the power of God, the future of the LDS church and the final triumph of good over evil.
Article: The Role and Importance of the LDS Church President
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints is led by a "living prophet." This article is designed to clarify the role and importance of the President of the LDS church. It is mostly quotes of several prominent church leaders about the role and importance of the LDS church President.
Quotes: About Church Membership
These are quotes about membership in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. The quotes come from the prophets and apostles.
Website: Quotes of LDS Prophets and Apostles
This website has quotes from all of the Presidents of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and many of the Apostles of the church. There are many very powerful quotes on this website.
Video: Creation and Evolution - A Witness of Prophets
This is an outstanding video dealing with the theory of evolution, and especially the quotes of living prophets regarding the theory of evolution.
The official position of the LDS church on the theory of evolution is made very clear in this video!! Many quotes of presidents of the church and modern apostles are presented.
This video is highly recommended for anyone who wonders how the church leaders feel about Darwin and his theory of evolution.
To Obtain a Copy, Visit:
Other LDS Websites on Evolution
This is a web page that links to other websites which discuss LDS doctrine versus the theory of evolution:
Here is an old version of the "Patterns of Intelligence" book:
To Learn More About the LDS Church
Here is a website that has many quotes by many of the apostles and prophets of the LDS church, on a variety of topics:
Even though the LDS Church officially rejects the theory of evolution (see the 1909 Statement, linked to above, and the Book of Mormon, Alma chapter 30, among many other documents), no book or article which is involved in scientific debates or which discusses the scientific issues of the theory of evolution, even if it strongly supports official church doctrine, is endorsed by the LDS church unless it is part of an official church publication.
The gospel deals with eternal and unchanging truths but all of the fields of science constantly change as new discoveries are made. Thus, the church does not establish any scientific claim as being absolute.
As a result, the books and articles written by R. Webster Kehr represent the opinions of the author and are too scientific to be published or endorsed by the LDS church.
About The Author, R. Webster Kehr
This website is a product of R. Webster Kehr, who lives in Lees Summit, Missouri, near Kansas City. I have two college degrees from Brigham Young University: a B.S. in mathematics (1972) and a B.S. in accounting (1974).
I am a retired cancer researcher (of natural medicine) and before retiring I worked with more than ten thousand cancer patients. I wrote almost all of the articles on the www.cancertutor.com website. This is one of the articles on why the average person knows nothing truthful about cancer:
If someone is dealing with cancer they should contact the people who currently operate the Cancer Tutor website because they have expert one-on-one support available for cancer patients. The www.cancertutor.com website is a great resource for all cancer patients!!
My wife of more than 44 years, Marit Olaug Liset Kehr, died May 7, 2016. She was from Norway. We met in Provo, Utah a month before I left on my mission to California. To give you an idea of how old I am, when I went on my mission there were 3 missions in California, now there are more than 20 missions in California! My wife was a genealogist and we have seven children and 20 grandchildren, scattered from Idaho to South Carolina.
My email address is below. Whether you have a question or a comment, please feel free to email me!! I love to communicate with people about the theory of evolution.
Don't forget to email all of your friends about this website!! And above all, please use social media to spread the word about this website!!!!!!!!! This website gets so few hits, that sometimes I think that my website is military-grade Top Secret!!! But it is not Top Secret, it is public information!!
PLEASE SPREAD THE WORD!!!
(My email address is camouflaged to avoid web crawlers)
Note: Due to changes in search engine algorithms, this area is reserved for additional keywords:|
This website is the best creation science website on the Internet This website is the best anti-evolution website on the Internet This website is primarily about Prophets versus Evolution, meaning Evolution versus Prophets.
This is an intelligent Design article for Mormons or Latter-Day Saints.
And this manuscript also deals with Prophets versus Darwin, meaning Darwin versus Prophets.
It includes detailed discussions about Prophets or Evolution in addition to Evolution or Prophets.
This website discusses in detail the topic of intelligent design for Mormonism.
Included are large discussions about Mormonism versus Evolution, and furthermore Evolution versus Mormonism.
Creation Scientists forget that God without Living Prophets is like mashed potatoes without gravy.
Intense discussions and debates about Mormonism or Evolution as opposed to Evolution or Mormonism are part of this website.
This LDS website, loyal to LDS doctrines, is mainly about Mormons versus Darwin, meaning Darwin versus Mormons.
This LDS website, by a member, is about Mormons versus Evolution, meaning Evolution versus Mormons.
These free articles and books are clearly and intentionally about intelligent Design website for Mormons.
This site also includes long discussions regarding Mormonism versus Darwin, plus Darwin versus Mormonism.
This website about living prophets and evolution does not forget to discuss Mormonism or Intelligent Design.
The details do not exclude the issues of Prophets or Darwin in addition to Darwin or Prophets.
This website definitely is mainly about Mormons or Darwin and not incidentally about Darwin or Mormons.
It intentionally includes discussions about Mormons or Evolution and not accidentally about Evolution or Mormons.
This website carefully includes the important topic of intelligent design and Mormonism.
There is no doubt that this website is an intelligent Design for Latter-Day Saints or Mormons website.
Creation Scientists remember to talk about God, but they forget to talk about living prophets.
What good is God without Living Prophets to lead the people of God? But it is primarily about Mormonism or Darwin as opposed to Darwin or Mormonism.
This prophets or evolution website includes chapters and discussions about Mormonism and Intelligent Design.
There is no doubt at all that this website is inclusive of intelligent Design for Mormons.