|
Note: This website has four free eBooks and dozens of free articles. Nothing is sold on this website. Links from one article to another are in blue and if you click a blue link the article will generally open in a new window so you won't lose your place. Items in green are informational items and are not links.
About The Author (A World-Famous Retired Cancer Researcher) And The Truth About CancerBefore getting into the theory of evolution debate I want to talk about my background. My name is R. Webster Kehr. I am an ex-Marine, Viet Nam veteran who was seriously wounded in action (yes, I have a purple heart and many scars). I live in Missouri, near Kansas City. By profession I am a retired, world famous cancer researcher who worked with about 13,000 cancer patients before I retired!!! Let me say something about cancer. Here is the truth about cancer that you will never hear in the media: herbalists (in America) and homeopaths (in Europe) were CURING CANCER for more than 100 years before DNA was discovered in 1953!!! And the natural cancer treatments of today's experts are far, far better than they have ever been because today's natural medicine cancer researchers have many more treatment options!!! For example: they know many ways to revert cancer cells into normal cells (so much for the absurd "theory" that DNA damage causes cancer)!!! It has been known since 1890 (not a typo) that cancer was caused by a bacteria which is inside the cancer cells!!! These bacteria intercept glucose (well they eat the glucose) which lowers the level of pyruvate and ATP energy. The DEFINITION of a cancer cell is a cell with low levels of ATP energy (two very-well deserved Nobel Prizes were given for this discovery)!!! If you kill these bacteria, which is easy to do with natural medicine, the cancer cells will revert into normal cells!!! Why kill a sick cell?? But some natural cancer treatments do kill cancer cells and others build the imune system. In the 1930s, Dr. Royal Rife (a microbiologist) had a 100% cure rate for cancer and the only thing that his "Rife Machines" did was kill the bacteria inside the cancer cells!!! Todays "Rife Machines" use much newer technology and are called the GB-4000 SR-4 and the GB-4000 M.O.P.A. But today one of these devices is optional (due to cost) and even if they are used they would only be one of the 15 or so natural cancer treatments that a patient should use every day. But the experts who work with cancer patients today can say a lot more about these things.
If you think that natural cancer treatments are whimpy, spend a couple of hours slowly scrolling down the ICRF Reference Manual (this is a reference manual, not a treatment manual), this will give you a clue as to the power of natural cancer treatments!!! Remember this is a link to another article so click this blue link and the article will open in a new window so you won't lose your place (note the website URL that this manual is on): This reference manual proves that God loves His children and He has put many highly effective treatments for cancer in Mother Nature!!! Do NOT use the Reference Manual to put together a cancer treatment because there are safety rules that the experts know about!!! I will talk about the experts in a minute. Let me say something about the claim of orthodox medicine that DNA damage causes cancer. It is a stupid theory!!! In my seven articles on cancer on this website I talk about a very simple experiment that will prove that DNA damage is not causing the cancer!!! While the experiment is for a specific patient, every cancer patient would get the same result!!! In theory DNA damage can cause cancer, but DNA is so gigantic (3.2 billion nucleotides long), and the location of where the DNA damage would need to be to cause cancer is so very, very, very, very, very small, that statistically speaking I doubt there is a single cancer patient in America who has cancer caused by DNA damage at any given time!!! In addition, cells take very, very, very good care of their DNA!!! If you have cancer, work with experts at the www.CancerTutor.com website who know what works and they know the safety rules!!! What do you think the 5-year survival rate of cancer patients who use "orthodox" cancer treatments is (i.e. chemotherapy, radiation and surgery [though surgery is sometimes helpful])?? The answer is 2.1%!!! This is not acceptable!!! This very poor cure rate is because chemotherapy and radiation do NOT target cancer cells!!! So orthodox cancer treatments must be used in very, very low doses. But even in very, very low doses chemotherapy and radiation still do not target cancer cells!!!
Here is my introduction to natural cancer treatments on this website (this article links to the oncology journal article that has the documentation for the 2.1% five-year cure rate of orthodox medicine that I just mentioned): If you want even more information about natural cancer treatments and other health conditions, go to the very bottom of this home page, which also has a yellow background and read the "Truth About Cancer" article. This article, and six other articles on cancer on this website, will point you in the right direction to the experts who work 1-on-1 with cancer patients and other health conditions!!! Their headquarters are in Utah but they work with cancer patients all over the world!!! I have already given you their website (the ICRF Reference Manual is on their website): www.CancerTutor.com. While I don't work with cancer patients any more (I retired and turned the website over to two of my very close research friends who have done a magnificant job since I retired), my email address is at the bottom of this home page if you have any questions for me regarding either cancer or the theory of evolution. Don't forget to tell your friends about this website on social media!!! They will learn the truth about both cancer and evolution for free!! So let's talk about the truth of the theory of evolution!!! |
|
Welcome To The www.ProphetsOrEvolution.com WebsiteThere are two basic doctrines about where we came from. All religions, by defintion, claim that God created Adam and Eve and that Adam and Eve are on our pedigree chart. Those who support the theory of evolution claim that God does not exist and that Adam and Eve never existed and that humans "evolved" from some other primate, such as bonobo, chimpanzee, monkey, etc. So in its simplest form the evolution debate is the question: do we have on our pedigree chart Adam and Eve or do we have some bonobo or chimpanzee or monkey on our pedigree chart??? If Adam and Eve are on our pedigree chart they would have had exactly the same DNA that modern humans have. But if we "evolved" from bonobos, the atheists and evolutionists must explain how bonobo DNA "evolved" into human DNA, both male and female. Much will be said on this website about this very question. By doing away with God the atheists and evolutionists also do away with the Biblical claim that Jesus Christ was the literal Son of God. No one can claim that Jesus Christ did not exist because there are plenty of ancient documents, even other than the Bible, which mention Him. Let us look at a quote from the late Latter-Day Saint (i.e. Mormon) scholar Robert J. Matthews (who died in 2009) in his, "Origin of Man: The Doctrinal Famework":
Dr. Matthews makes it very, very clear that the theory of evolution debate is ultimately a battle about the existence of the Godhead!!! Dr. Matthews was absolutely correct!! The theory of evolution is designed to convert people who believe in God over to people who believe that we "evolved" from lower primates!!! Because of the theory of evolution, many people no longer believe in Heavenly Father or the mission of the Messiah or the importance of the Holy Ghost!!! The debate can be summarized very quickly: are Adam and Eve on our pedigree chart or is some bonobo couple (or some other primate) on our pedigree chart??!! The answer should be easy: Adam and Eve would have had exactly the same DNA structure as people today!! End of debate!!! Well, the atheists and evolutionists don't give up that easy. If evolution is true, the atheists and evolutionists must explain how the DNA of bonobos or monkeys or baboons, etc. (which obviously have vastly different DNA than humans) became human DNA!!! So what may start out as a simple question quickly becomes the question: "can the DNA of one species 'evolve' into new and vastly improved DNA for a vastly improved species?" Much of this website is about that very question!!! In fact, we could go back much further than bonobos (or apes or whatever) to the "first living cell" which would have been the first life on this planet if evolution were true. I will talk the "first living cell" below in its own section. That is an interesting section. This website will focus on the scientific issues in this debate and I will tell you how the story ends: the theory of evolution cannot be true primarily because of the discovery of DNA in 1953!!! Those who claim that evolution is true must deal with both the mathematical issues and the physical issues of how the DNA of one species can be changed into a sequence of nucleotides which is not only vastly different, but vastly superior so that a new and improved species can be created (defining a "species" as an animal with a specific DNA sequence/structure) by evolution!!! As you will see, the theory of evolution is not a credible theory after the discovery of DNA and the sophistication of cells!!! Preachers and ministers and apostles and prophets all claim that God is alive and well. So do not lose site of the fact that while on the surface the evolution debate may be about science, beneath the surface the real debate is about the existence of the Godhead (i.e. Heavently Father, the Savior and the Holy Ghost)!!!
The Scriptures Predicted The Coming Of The Theory Of Evolution!!Was God surprised when Darwin's theory of evolution started to convince people that there was no God?? Of course not!!! Both the Bible and the Book of Mormon (the Book of Mormon is also an ancient book written by ancient prophets, but it was mostly written in the Americas) make it very clear that God created Adam and Eve and all animals and that the theory of evolution was coming!!!
In the Book of Mormon there is a story where satan himself appears to a man named Korihor and satan taught Korihor that God did not exist (which is the foundation of the theory of evolution). The great prophet Alma the Younger was not amused by Korihor's request for a sign that God lives and Alma the Younger (via the priesthood) commanded Korihor to be struck dumb (Alma 30: 46-53)!!! (Note: when versus are mentioned, the key versus are highlighted). Here is a blue link to that article:
That should give you an idea of what God (via one of His prophets) thinks about the theory of evolution. Here is an article on that event: The theory of evolution today is designed to do away with a belief in the Godhead by claiming that God (i.e. Heavenly Father) and the Holy Ghost do not exist. The atheists and evolutionists cannot claim that Jesus Christ did not exist because there are many ancient documents, even other than the Bible, which mention Him. So the atheists and evolutionists can only claim that Christ did not perform any miracles, such as the raising of the dead and His own resurrection. But even during Bible times, converting people away from the mission and doctrines of Christ was not appreciated by God. Here is a quote from the Bible (Christ was speaking to the people in His day, but what He said applies today just as well!!): Matthew 18:6-7: "6 But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea. 7 Woe unto the world because of offences! for it must needs be that offences come; but woe to that man by whom the offence cometh!
Here is the original source:
The Book of Mormon is nowhere near as diplomatic as the Bible (as we already saw with Alma the Younger and Korihor)!!! The Book of Mormon also talks about a punishment called: "like unto the son of perdition" (3 Nephi 29:5-7). There are very specific criteria for that punishment that I talk about in other articles (pay close attention to the phrase "like unto the Son of Perdition"): Any punishment with the words "Son of Perdition" as part of the phrase is not something that someone should try and obtain!!! To no ones surprise, even living prophets and apostles have been critical of the theory of evolution. As one example, here is a quote by a living apostle, Elder Jeffrey R. Holland, from a speech given at Brigham Young University. He mentioned by name four of the best-known atheists/evolutionists: (Note: if you click on the blue link below the quote, and if you click the triangle/arrow link you can both watch and read his amazing speech at the same time.) Here is a quote from this speech:
I should mention that the Book of Mormon was published in 1830, more than 110 years before Richard Dawkins, one of the people he mentioned, was born!!! And the Book of Mormon was published 29 years before Darwin's first book was published!!! Yes, God didn't like the theory of evolution long before Charles Darwin and Richard Dawkins came along!!! The original prophets who wrote the Book of Mormon finished writing the Book of Mormon in 421 A.D.!!! So even before 421 A.D. God knew that people like Richard Dawkins would exist in the last-days. All four of the men mentioned by Elder Holland easily fit the criteria for becoming "like unto the Son of Perdition." But this is such a horrific punishment that only God can make the final determination!!! For example, some of those who fit into this category today may repent and be forgiven. The words used in 2 Nephi 29:5-7 seem to apply only to professional atheists and evolutionists who write books or get paid to give lectures or to participate in debates and they mock the miracles of Christ. I personally do not think these versus apply to teachers and school adminstrators who are responsible for the theory of evolution being taught in classrooms. These people are not paid primarily for preaching evolution and they hopefully do not mock the miracles of Christ!!! But that is only my opinion.
Getting back to evolution, the doctrines of the theory of evolution are satan's perfect doctrine because they do away with a belief in:
The theory of evolution is a mirror-image of the doctrines of The Church of Jesus Christ Of Latter-Day Saints (and to a large degree every other Christian church). Here is an article on that subject (this article has a chart):
Another article which digs into these issues is the First Book article which identifies three different places in the Book of Mormon where the theory of evolution is predicted: So let us begin the scientific perspective of this debate.
What Does The Word "Evolution" Really Mean??The athiests and evolutionists claim that all animals were created by "evolution," meaning every animal "evolved" from a prior, less sophisticated species. For example, they may say that humans "evolved" from bonobos or some other primate. But there is a major problem with the theory of evolution. The word "evolution" does not represent a tangible object or a physical process that can create things!! Evolution is only a claim or belief that there is no God. Theories and beliefs only exist inside of people's brains, they cannot create physical things, much less create physical things intelligently!!! Only tangible things can create other tangible things!!! Let me repeat that: Only tangible things can create other tangible things!!! Get that through your head: Only tangible things can create other tangible things!!! But "evolution" and imaginary processes are not tangible and they are not a force in nature such as gravity or wind or sunlight!!
See this webpage on the Types of Forces: Note that the word "evolution" does not appear on this page, nor should it!!! In short, the word "evolution" is nothing more than a claim or belief that there is no God!! That's it!!! Evolution is not a physical object or a force that can do things, much less do things intelligently (such as sequence the nucleotides on any DNA strand)!! Humans did not "evolve" from other primates any more than humans "evolved" from Donald Duck because both Donald Duck and "evolution" are imaginary things!!! Evolution has no arms to create cells or DNA, it has no legs to travel, and above all evolution has no brain to design and intelligently sequence the nucleotides on any DNA strand and evolution cannot create the many different types of cells which are needed for the one million species of animals currently on this planet, all of which have both males and females whose DNA must align in an incredibly precise way!!!
How can I make the "evolution" debate any more clear!!!!!! Superman, the tooth fairy, the flying spaghetti monster, the theory of evolution , Mickey Mouse, Donald Duck, etc. are all exactly the same thing - a make-believe fantasy!!! None of these fantasies can pick up a deck of cards, cook a dinner or design, create and sequence a single DNA strand!!! In fact, every time you hear or see the word "evolution" substitute the word "evolution" with the word "Batman." So in summary, no animal species on this planet has ever evolved from another animal species because "evolution" is nothing more than a Superman comic book!!! Let me say that again: So in summary, no animal species on this planet has ever evolved from another animal species because "evolution" is nothing more than a Superman comic book!!!
AccidentsSo if there is no God, as claimed by the atheists/evolutionists, and if "evolution" has the same imaginary physical features as Superman, Batman and Robin, then what would be the force in nature that created human DNA and the DNA for all other species??? The atheists and evolutionists have no choice except to claim that the Universe, cells, DNA, etc. were all created by UNINTENTIONAL, DIRECTIONLESS, PURPOSELESS, MINDLESS ACCIDENTS!!! However, the atheists and evolutionists will never use the term "accidents" because they know that no one would believe them if they used the word "accidents" instead of the imaginary word "evolution"!!! Some might claim that the Big Bang was an accident (the discovery of Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation, which resulted in two Nobel Prizes, proved the Big Bang really happened). However, God, or someone He deligated, had to "push the button" for the Big Bang. Here is the reason that God had to create the Big Bang: accidents could not have crammed all of the atoms in this Universe into one small object (perhaps the size of a beach ball) and then exploded this unbelievably dense object!!! Most people don't know these things so the Big Bang will continue to be a controversial theory as to what created the object that exploded and how the object exploded. God was the mastermind, but we don't know who actually executed His wishes (some think it was Christ). But my point is that the Big Bang could not have been an accident!!!! In fact, I consider the Big Bang to be a massive proof that God is alive an well and incredibly powerful. And more importantly, the Big Bang proved the God existed before the Universe existed!!!
The Theory of Evolution Battle In The SchoolsUnfortunately, the imaginary "theory of evolution" is taught in many schools, from middle school to college. In fact, the average young person today goes to church on the weekends and is told there is a God, but during the week in school they may be taught that the theory of evolution is true and there is no God. Because of the teaching of the theory of evolution (i.e. the religion of atheism) in schools, many, many young people of all religions (starting in middle school in many cases) have lost their faith in God and have quit going to church, or if they are taken to church by their parents, they will go to church but they will not believe anything they hear!!! That is the very goal and purpose of the theory of evolution - to convince people that there is no God. Those who argue that the theory of evolution should be taught in schools may claim that all scientists are evolutionists. However, the theory of evolution is NOT universally accepted by all scientists!! While there are hundreds of books which have been written to push the theory of evolution; there are also hundreds of books which have been written against the theory of evolution!! Four of these books are free and are on this website. Plus, in the scientific community, among those who have not written books, there are many scientists who are very much against the theory of evolution!!! Those who believe that the scientific evidence strongly supports a belief in God are called "creation scientists." The term "intelligent design" is also used to describe "creation science." The well-known and respected creation scientist Kent Hovind describes the atheists this way: "The atheists can't find God for the same reason a thief can't find a policeman." That quote hits the nail on the head!!! The atheists/evolutionists don't want to find God because of pride!!! Pride is the underlying, undergirding, driving force of the theory of evolution, it is certainly not science!!!! In fact, the theory of evolution is nothing but atheism in disguise. So any school which teaches evolution is teaching the religion of atheism in their school!!! Later on this home page I will have a section called: Measuring The Damage Caused By The Theory of Evolution which talks about Ken Ham's research on the damage done by the theory of evolution to the young people of his evangelical faith. As you probably figured out by now I am a "Latter-Day Saint" (i.e. Mormon). So let's get started with the scientific issues related to the theory of evolution debate!!!
Introduction To The Evolution Debate - Cell BiologyTo begin the scientific issues of the evolution debate, suppose you and a friend were on a hike deep in the forest. You were proud to have traveled so far away from civilization!! Suddenly, as you came over a hill you saw, what looked like to you, a brand new Buick automobile with its engine running!! Would you think that this Buick was created by an accidental explosion in the forest?? Of course not!! Would you think that a team of monkeys in the forest had created this Buick?? Of course not!! Would you think that this Buick was created by a team of fifth grade children in your local grade school who had snuck out of class one day?? Of course not!! You would think that this Buick was created in a giant manufacturing plant in Michigan and/or in other places. Was the giant assembly line where this Buick was assembled created by a gigantic explosion?? Of course not!!! Guess what. Every cell in your body is far, far, far more sophisticated than any automobile or any automobile plant ever made by human beings!!! Human beings are not capable of creating anything as sophisticated as a cell, much less a living cell!!! Here is a quote from a book called "Evolution: A Theory In Crisis" by creationist (i.e. anti-evolutionist) Michael Denton:
He is essentially saying that accidents could not have created any living cell!!! And he was talking about what is going on inside of almost every cell in your body!!! An "irreducibly complex system" is, by definition, a sequence of complex chemical reactions, such that if any one of the chemical reactions was not there, or failed, the end result of the chemical reaction will fail and the entire cell may be at risk!!! And he was talking about a typical cell in your body!!! Guess what, most of the cells in your body can divide into two cells, each with the above sophistication!!! Try dividing a new automobile into two new automobiles by one team of strong men pulling on the front bumper and another team of strong men pulling on the back bumper!!! Even if they were successful at pulling the car apart they would not end up with two cars, they would end up with two worthless halves of a single car!! But not all cells divide. Be glad that brain cells do not divide or you would not be able to remember your name. That is another example of how sophisticated the human body is!!! Well, brain cells are more sophisticated than I am mentioning. Sometimes brain cells do divide. A new human baby starts out as a single fertilized egg and ends up, via cell divisions, with 37.2 trillion cells!!! This new baby has roughly 200 different kinds of cells some of which are transparent (or the baby could not see)!!! If your bone cells ended up in the pupils of your eyes you would be blind!!! The location throughout your body of these 200 different types of cells is critical to your survival!!! So for 37.2 trillion cells the right type of cell must be in exactly the right location!!! Accidents?? Nope - God!!! Thousands of very smart scientists (and I mean really, really smart scientists) have a PhD degree in either Cell Biology or Microbiology or Genetics. Every cell in your body is vastly more sophisticated than any authomobile or airplane ever made!!! PhDs in Cell Biology and Microbiology and Genetics and Genomics are still being given out to each new generation of scientists as more and more is learned about DNA and cells!!! These scientists could write a website dozens of times bigger than this website containing thousands of reasons that Cell Biology and Microbiology, etc. by themselves, are a massive, massive proof that God is alive and well and WOW is God smart!!! This will become more and more obvious the more you study this website. Let me give you another example. Sometimes you see drawings or pictures which seem to show an "evolution" of species from one species to another. But if you look at the DNA of these animals (which to some degree controls what each animal will look like), the theory of evolution falls apart because it is obvious that the DNA of one species could not have "evolved" into new and improved DNA for a new and improved species of animal!!! I talk a lot about this topic on this website!! It is not drawings that control what an animal looks like, as will be seen below, it is the spirit of the animal, tweeked by the DNA of that animal, that controls what the animal will look like!!! That is what the Sixteen Cells Paradox article will talk about.
Introduction To DNA And EvolutionThe atheists/evolutionists will always pretend that the imaginary and invisible evolution is massively more intelligent than human beings - and human beings do not understand all of the DNA for any living thing!!! Regarding evolution, one of the giant facts which will be discussed when I talk about "permutations of nucleotides" (a "permutation," in this context, means a specific sequence of nucleotides on a DNA strand), is to emphasize that if the theory of evolution were true, there would literally be more dead animals on this planet (whose sequence of nucleotides on their DNA was not good enough to create a viable animal) than there are atoms in billions and billions of Universes!!! This is because if a DNA strand was sequenced by "evolution" (i.e. accidents), there would be vastly more dead animals on this planet than there would be atoms in many, many billions of Universes!!! Permutations are incredibly powerful evidences against evolution as you will see!!! As another example, human beings do not know how to sequence the nucleotides on the DNA strand for an ant (without cheating), much less how to sequence the nucleotides on the DNA for an extinct animal species for which scientists currently have little or no DNA!!! So how did "accidents" create and sequence the nucleotides for all living (and formerly living) animals??? It takes four new DNA strands to create a new species. There have been ten million species of animals on this planet, but only one million of them still exist!!! Ponder this: if humans are not smart enough to sequence a single DNA strand, how did accidents sequence the 40 million unique types of DNA strands (just for animals) which have been, or currently are, on this planet??? How did the invisible and imaginary "evolution" create that many DNA strands with zero evidence of any failures (except perhaps in cases where the DNA had been damged)!!! My point is that millions of supremely sophisticated types of DNA strands did not get created by the imaginary evolution or the mindless accidents of evolution!!! Scientists can create a DNA strand, and that is amazing - bravo - it is the sequencing of the nucleotides on the DNA that they will never will be able to do!! They will know why they will never be able to sequence all of a DNA strand for any dead/extinct or living animal when they understand the Sixteen Cells Paradox article which I will talk about below. As that article will explain, DNA is not used in the way that scientists think it is used!! DNA is not a computer program (e.g. to control cell divisions), much of DNA is a database (which is used by the spirit of the new baby) which is why male and female DNA can align. It is much easier to align two databases (male DNA and female DNA) than to align two computer programs. But God can do either of these things but accidents cannot do either of these things. More on this later.
Neither humans, nor Superman, nor Batman, nor evolution, nor accidents can sequence the nucleotides on a DNA strand so that this DNA strand can help create (via millions or billions or trillions or quadrillions of cell divisions) a new species or bring back to life an extinct species.
A mature Woolly Mammoth certainly had quadrillions of cells But even if scientists could sequence the DNA for an extinct animal species, they could never bring that species back to life without God providing a spirit for that animal!!! The Sixteen Cells Paradox article, that I will link to below, proves that spirits are needed to create life, but spirits are also necessary to control cell divisions after the fertilization of an ovum!!! Sometimes on this website I say that DNA is what controls cell divisions. This is "old technology" and is not correct; but I have not had time to "fix" all of the articles or chapters of books that say that DNA controls cell divisions. The Sixteen Cells Paradox proves that DNA cannot control the cell divisions for any animal. Only God can create a spirit, though in some articles on LDS (i.e. LDS stands for "Latter-Day Saints" who are better knows as "Mormons," who are Christians) websites there is some indication that spirits have existed forever, but I won't get into that issue here!!! The point is that spirits exist and we wouldn't be here if God did not exist!!! In summary, just like the fact that the imaginary "evolution" cannot create a cell or a DNA strand, mindless accidents also cannot create a cell or a DNA strand!!! So let's start talking about the heart and soul of the theory of evolution debate.
Note #1: I write articles so this home page is not hundreds of pages long so don't ignore the articles, they provide critical in depth information. Remember, links to other articles, which will open in a new window, are in bright blue.
Note #2: This article links to many of the articles on this website, but not all of the articles:
Note #3: There are also four free eBooks on this website. Here is an article which links to all four books:
Can One Species (e.g. bonobos) "Evolve" Into A New And Improved Species (e.g. humans)??Now we will start talking about science and mathematics relative to the evolution debate. We exist because God created Adam and Eve or we exist because of evolution. In other words, we descended from Adam and Eve or we are descended from some other primate, such as bonobos or apes or chimpanzees. The entire foundation of the theory of evolution is that one species can "evolve" into a new and improved species. The example that I frequently use is the claim of the atheists/evolutionists that humans "evolved" from bonobos or some other primate. While that claim may have been credible before the discovery of DNA, it certainly isn't credible after the discovery of DNA in 1953!!! To claim that humans "evolved" from bonobo (as an example) is to claim that the DNA of a bonobo (actually four different bonobo DNA strands) can randomly mutate into four vastly superior DNA strands for the human species!!! I say "vastly superior" because human brains are vastly superior to bonobo brains even though bonobos can climb trees better than humans. I would rather have my brain. There are both massive physical reasons and there are massive mathematical reasons why the DNA of a new species cannot be created by modifying the DNA of an old species by the mindless accidents of evolution.
Here is an article on the physical reasons that evolution cannot be true:
Here is an article on the mathematical reasons that evolution cannot be true: I will mention both of these articles from time to time because these two articles represent the foundation of the evolution debate!!! The permutation issues will also lead to the concept of the question: "where are the failures of evolution?" This turns out to be a major issue!!!
Bar charts are a very good way to compare intelligence to no intelligence. Look at each bar chart in this chapter of one of the free eBooks on this website and then look carefully at the last bar chart to see a histogram of pure randomness/accidents (i.e. a histogram of what evolution would create every time!!!):
Yes, the flat bar chart is exactly what evolution / accidents would create. No living thing could exist with a flat bar chart. More is said about this issue in the two "Kehr's Paradox" articles: My point is that "evolution" has the intelligence of Superman and every DNA strand created by "evolution" or by accidents would have roughly an equal number of A, C, G and T nucleotides!!! And let us not forget that "evolution" is no more real than Superman and that everything I have talked about must be done by blind, deaf and dumb accidents!!! Drawings about the steps of how humans "evolved" from some other primate are beyond ludicrous!!! Today, the theory of evolution debate is not about visualizations and creative thinking, it is about where new DNA comes from!! If "evolution" existed, it would require that the DNA of one species be "accidentally" modified into the DNA of a new and improved species!!! This would typically require many millions of changes to the DNA of the original species in order to create a new and improved species from an existing species (e.g. the modification of bonobo DNA into human DNA)!!! The human brain alone would require millions of changes to each of four bonobo DNA strands!!! And when done the four new human DNA strands must align with each other at the function level. By "function level" (as an example) I mean the section of DNA on the two male types of DNA strands, which are involved with the creation of the liver, must be in the same location as the section of DNA on the two female DNA strands which are involved with the creation of the liver.
Sperm Cells and Ovum
Before going on I need to say something about sperm cells and ovums so you will understand what I am going to talk about below. Let's look at the sperm cells and ovums of humans, all of which contain a unique sequence of nucleotides on every DNA strand (i.e. every DNA strand inside of every sperm cell and every DNA strand inside of every ovum has a unique sequence of nucleotides): The female has one or more ovums (i.e. eggs) which are gender neutral. It is the sperm cell (male sperm cell or female sperm cell) from the male, which gets to the ovum first, that will determine the sex of the baby!! There is literally a swimming race of sperm cells to get to the ovum first!!! The first one there wins and fertilizes the ovum. The fact that the DNA in every sperm cell and every ovum has a UNIQUE sequence of nucleotides is almost as good a proof that all animals have spirits as the Sixteen Cells Paradox article proves!!! It makes perfect sense that DNA is primarily a database, but it would make no sense if every DNA strand was a computer program. Identical twins are not made by the same sequence of nucleotides on two male sperm cells and two female ovum, what happens is that after the egg is fertilized, the fertilized egg divides in a certain way. All of these facts apply to every animal species. To summarize: in order for humans to have "evolved" from bonobo (or pick any primate you want to pick), MILLIONS of random, mindless changes would have been needed to convert EACH OF FOUR DNA STRANDS OF THE BONOBO into FOUR VASTLY SUPERIOR DNA STRANDS FOR HUMANS and all of this must happen in the same latitude, longitude and timeframe or else the new male and female humans (who have the new human DNA) would not be able to mate in order to start the human race!!! And when the four new and improved human DNA strands are built, these four new and improved DNA strands must align with each other at the function level (e.g. the section of DNA which is involved with the creation of the liver [or more technically the database fields involved with the creation of the liver] must be in the same place on all four DNA strands when creating a new species)!!! Note: It can get confusing, but it takes four new DNA strands to create a new species from an existing species [if evolution were true]. But once this new species is up and running it only takes three types of DNA strands to perpetuate the species because an ovum can be used for either a male sperm cell or a female sperm cell. This is true of all animal species!! So it is somewhat like comparing apples (four new DNA strands to create a new species) to oranges (three types of DNA strands to maintain an existing species). So the issues include mathematical issues (i.e. having the sequence of nucleotides on four DNA strands be changed to create a new and improved species) and physical issues (i.e. physically changing the DNA of one species into the DNA of another species) and latitude, longitude and timeframe issues. And other issues. Now I should also add that all of these changes cannot happen in one generation. In fact, if evolution were true it might take thousands of generations to make all of these changes by mindless evolution!!! Needless, to say, the coordination of these four DNA strands, over thousands of generations (as requred by evolution) is just one of many massively, massively, massively powerful reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true!!! Getting back to bonobos, how could one or two bonobo mothers have a total of two human children who in turn can have human children of their own!!! As mentioned above, to create a new species from an old species (humans from bonobo as an example), requires four bonobo DNA strands to "evolve" into four new and improved human DNA strands!!! So let's go into more detail on this issue because this is a critical issue to clearly understand.
The Four New DNA Strands Which Are Needed To Create A New SpeciesHere are the four bonobo DNA strands I am talking about which must evolve into four human DNA strands so that the human race can begin (the minimum two new human male sperm cells and the minimum two new human female ovums must be completed in the same generation so the bonobo mother can give birth to two human children who can grow up and have their own human children)!!! 1) Millions of mindless changes to a DNA strand in at least one bonobo male sperm cell in a male bonobo to create a human male sperm cell, 2) Millions of mindless changes to a DNA strand in at least one bonobo female sperm cell in a male bonobo to create a human female sperm cell, 3) Millions of mindless changes to a DNA strand in a gender-neutral ovum in a female bonobo (for the first male sperm cell [to create a male human] to fertilize), 4) Millions of mindless changes to a DNA strand in a second gender-neutral ovum in a female bonobo (for the second male sperm cell [to create a female human] to fertilize). And these four new human DNA strands (two from male bonobo DNA and two from female bonobo DNA) must align with each other at the function level!!! Also note that bonobos, like humans, would have many sperm cells involved in this swimming race to the ovum, most of which are bonobo sperm cells which have not been modified by evolution so the two new human sperm cells must win the swimming race!!! This is just another bump in the road for the theory of evolution. There are also latitude, longitude and timeframe issues as I already mentioned. For example, if the first male human DNA was created by evolution one-thousand years before the first female human DNA was created by evolution, and/or the two bonobo mothers were 5,000 miles apart, you would not be reading this sentence if evolution were true!!! Well, one or two bonobo fathers and one or two bonobo mothers could be involved, but this is an academic issue because the statistics of any of this happening are so bad. Plus, the bonobo parents (of the first human male and female babies) must not kill or abandon their human babies because human babies are really funny-looking to bonobos (i.e. they do not look like their beautiful bonobo children)!!! The probability that millions of mindless, random, accidental changes to each of four bonobo DNA strands and that these random changes could create four vastly superior human DNA strands for the human race, and these changes must realistically be spread out over many generations (and the DNA must align in each generation or disasters would occur - which in itself is a major proof that evolution cannot be true) is both physically and mathematically and common sense absurd!!! And the new human couples (generation after generataion) must eventually start having more than two human children so that the new human race can begin to grow in numbers!!! Yet, the "evolution" of DNA of the bonobo sperm cells and ovums into human sperm cells and ovums is precisely the foundation of the theory of evolution after the discovery of DNA in 1953!!! And there have been ten million animal species which have lived on this planet, all of which would have to go through the same process that creating humans from bonobos would have to go through if evolution were true!!! That is forty-million new and highly sophisticated DNA strands created by the mindless accidents of evolution without any significant evidence of failures in this process!!! By the way, only one million of these ten million species still exist. If evolution were true, the Cambrian Explosion cannot be explained because evolution cannot create a new species with four new DNA strands which must align with each other (at the function level of course), much less create many new species in a short amount of time (which is the characteristic feature of the Cambrian Explosion)!!! And if the theory of evolution were true, a really good genealogist could trace our ancestry (species to species) back to the "first living cell". Well, they are probably busy enough that they don't need that assignment. In addition, monkey's don't keep very good genealogy records. We can summarize the theory of evolution debate thusly: how can four DNA strands of one species be both physically and intelligently changed into four DNA strands for a new and improved species BY SOMETHING THAT DOESN'T EVEN EXIST (I.E. "EVOLUTION")???!!! And quite frankly, accidents aren't much smarter than Superman, but at least accidents can do tangible things!! About this time any statistician would declare a winner in the evolution debate: God!! But there is much more to talk about in more detail.
A KEY ARTICLE: The Sixteen Cells ParadoxSome time ago I was simulating in my head the cell divisions after an ovum was fertilized. When I got to the new human baby having sixteen cells something struck me: if the DNA in all sixteen of these cells were identical to the DNA in the fertilized egg (which obviously would be the case) and if DNA were controlling the cell divisions then each of these sixteen cells should lead to a head, 2 arms, 2 legs, etc. If this were the case, the new baby would have sixteen heads, 32 arms, 32 legs, etc. Something was wrong with my assumptions!!! In reality, a human being starts out as a single fertilized egg and via many trillions of cell divisions, a human baby is born nine-months later with one head, two arms, two legs, etc!!! The math simply doesn't make any sense!!!
The Sixteen Cells Paradox article PROVES THAT DNA CANNOT BE THE MAIN THING THAT IS CONTROLLING THE CELL DIVISIONS!!!! And this article explains WHAT IS CONTROLLING THESE CELL DIVISIONS!!!! The "Sixteen Cells Paradox" applies to all animals (male and female), not just humans. So all animals have a spirit!! This should not surprise anyone because all living things require a spirit for life!!! So it is efficient for Heavenly Father to create the spirit (though sometimes you read in LDS literature that spirits are not created, they have existed forever) so that the spirit can both create life and control the cell divisions. And spirits come from God!!! This article can explain why the DNA of male sperm cells and female sperm cells can align with each other - because DNA is a database of information, not a computer program to control cell divisions!!!! So the length of the DNA strand is largely, if not entirely, dependant on the size of the database on the DNA!! This is why the above DNA strands can align with each other, because the database "fields" can align. And this also destroys the theory of evolution because each species will have its own unique spirit and thus its own unique database. So if two animal species have the same size DNA, it has little or nothing to do with the complexity and sophistication of the species. To dig deeper, the spirit controls the cell divisions and the size of the DNA will be largely (if not entirely) dependent on the size of the database, meaning the size of the individual database elements (e.g. "fields") on the DNA strand!! The largest DNA strand on this planet, and it is much, much larger than human DNA, is for a fish, protopterus aethiopicus, which has 133 billion nucleotide pairs on its DNA!!! Why a fish has such a gigantic database I do not know. Let me briefly talk about "life." Scientists have tried to create life from non-life. They will NEVER be successful unless God cooperates and provides a spirit. I do not know if each bacteria has its own spirit or whether there is some general spirit for single-celled living things. I talk more about "What Is Life?" in a section later on. Humans, and all other species, exist because of God!!! Yes, science has confirmed that the Biblical account of Adam and Eve IS TRUE!!! Your geneology chart has Noah and his wife (some Bible scholars think her name was Naamah) on it and Adam and his wife Eve on it!!! In other words, Adam and Eve are on mine and your pedigree chart, not some bonobo couple!!! Try saying that in some college biology class!!! I would do it, but then I am an ex-Marine and Viet Nam veteran so everyone would be polite to an old man who went to war and got blown up while on patrol.
The Two-Male DNA Alignment Issue - This Section Will Absolutely Blow Your Mind!!!!Let us look at the two types of male DNA strands in the sperm cells for any animal species. One creates a male baby and one creates a female baby. Both of them must align with the female DNA strand in her ovum. But if each of them aligns with the female DNA strand in the ovum (at the function level of course), this implies that the two types of male DNA must align with each other (at the function level, not the nucleotide level), yet one will lead to a male baby and one will lead to a female baby!!!! There is no specific reason that the two male DNA strands need to align with each other at the function level except for the fact that BOTH OF THEM must align with a female DNA strand at the function level!! Here is the amazing thing: two male DNA strands must align with each other (at the function level but not at the nucleotide level), yet one of them will create a male baby and one of them will create a female baby!!! This is incomprehensible!!! Yet this fact applies to roughly 1,000,000 animal species which are currently on this planet and 9,000,000 extinct species of animals!!!
I want to show this somewhat graphically to emphasize my point. There are three kinds of DNA strands, for every existing species, which must align with each other: All three of these kinds of DNA are very, very different yet they must align with each other at the function level!!
Now let us ignore the third item in the above list and show the list again: What this means is that the two types of DNA in the male, one of which creates a male baby and one of which creates a female baby, must align with each other at the function level because both of them must align with the gender neutral DNA in the female ovum at the function level!!!! Yet one of these DNA strands will lead to a male baby and the other DNA strand will lead to a female baby!!! This is absolutely unbelievable!!! Yet, if DNA is looked at as a database, it makes perfect sense!!! Two databases are much easier to align than the object code of two computer programs!!! But note that this concept applies to one million living animal species and nine million extinct animal species!!!! Two male DNA strands must align with each other at the function level, yet one will create a male baby and the other will create a female baby!!! NO WAY!!!!! But God has done this for ten million animal species, one million of which are alive today!!! And I am sure that is precisely why God designed DNA to be a database!!! And don't forget that every DNA strand on this planet (at least for animals) has a unique sequence of nucleotides, which makes DNA very, very difficult to decode so I am not being critical of any scientists!!! They literally have an impossible task!!!
OK, well no one believes that this is a major reason evolution cannot be true (even though my first college degree was in mathematics), so here is a homework assignment tonight for human scientists. For some extinct species for which they only have (or a living species if the sequence of nucleotides in the male sperm cells, to create a female baby, is withheld from the scientists):
The task of scientists (or accidents if you prefer) is to design, sequence and create, without cheating: Good luck!!! I was born in 1946 so I am not going to live long enough for that to happen!!! Nor will my great-grandchildren live long enough (I don't have any yet, but I soon will)!!! I can assure you, given this assignment, that scientists would be delighted to learn that DNA is a database!!! In fact, scientists are NOT EVEN CLOSE to decoding the entire DNA strand of any species of plants, animals or insects!!! I have helped them in this assignment, but given that every DNA strand on this planet has a unique sequence of nucleotides, I don't think that knowing that DNA is a database (instead of a computer program) would help them very much. God is a tough act to follow!!! Now let's talk about one of the major, major articles on this website - the dreaded subject of permutations. Permutations of nucleotides are probably the #1 reason the theory of evolution cannot be true. By the time you finish the next section your eyes will bulge out!!!
Permutations Of Nucleotides On DNA And Related IssuesHopefully you have already read the aritlce on permutations. If not, please read it now. This section will take that article a step further. As a baseline there are about 4500 atoms in this Universe!!! That is a very big number. However, the number of possible permutations of a human DNA strand (a human DNA strand has 3,200,000,000 nucleotides - meaning A, C, G, T), both male and female (male DNA in male sperm cells of the male and female DNA in female sperm cells of the male and the DNA in the ovum of the female which must align with both of the male DNA strands at the function level), is 43,200,000,000!! This number dwarfs the number of atoms in many, many billions of Universes!!! Remember, it takes four new DNA strands to create a new species, such as humans. And each of the four DNA strands needs very specialized DNA, and for humans each sequence of nucleotides on their DNA must come from among 43,200,000,000 permutations of nucleotides!! Here is the key point: the vast, vast, vast, (literally insert the word "vast" one trillion more times) percent of these permutations would NOT create a viable human being or any other animal species. Yet four DNA strands (each with the same length) are needed to create every new animal species on this planet!!! But the key is that evolution is totally stupid and does everything randomly (well, actually evolution doesn't exist so I am using the term "evolution" instead of "accidents" to keep things simple). If you put together four totally random sequences of nucleotides, to simulate evolution, the probability that they would be good enough to create a human baby is far, far, far less that the probability of randomly picking a single correct atom from among a billion billion billion Universes the size of our Universe!!!!!!!!! If evolution were true, and the DNA for all species (not just humans) had been sequenced by accidents, there would literally be more worthless DNA strands (which did not have a viable permutation of nucleotides) laying on the ground on this planet, than there are atoms in a trillion, trillion, trillion, ... Universes!! Well, we can look at this another way. If evolution were true, there would not be enough atoms in a trillion, trillion, trillion, ..., Universes to create four viable DNA strands which would be needed to create all of the species on this planet (current or extinct) via nothing but accidents - this is because there would be so many failures in the attempt to do this you would run out of atoms in the Universe before all of the species on this just this planet were created!!! Mathematics is really not very user-friendly to the theory of evolution. It gets worse, trust me. So where are the countless failures of unusable DNA strands created by nothing but invalid permutations?? There are none!!! Yes, occasionally there is a mutation to a DNA strand, but these are very rare compared to the massive, massive number of worthless DNA strands that evolution would create!!! And in science in general, accidents never make something more sophisticated!!! Every cell that has DNA inside of it takes very, very, very good care of their DNA!!! That is one of many reasons that cells are so sophisticated. But also remember that four DNA strands, which must align with each other at the function level, are needed to create EACH OF THE 10 million animal species which have lived on this planet or currently live on this planet!!! That is 40,000,000 million DNA strands (needed to create 10,000,000 new animal species) that scientists do not understand just for animals!!! If the average animal DNA strand was 200,000,000 nucleotides long, that is 8,000,000,000,000,000 nucleotides!!! Here is where it gets worse for evolution: this much DNA would have 48,000,000,000,000,000 permutations!!! You are probably laughing so hard you will have to pick yourself up off the floor. This mathematical proof assumes that there are no spirits to direct the morphing of the embryo and that a DNA sequence solely controls this morphing of the embryo (which is precisely what "evolution" would require). Which is bigger, the 4500 atoms in this Universe or the 48,000,000,000,000,000 permutations of nucleotides for all animal species which have or do exist on this planet!!! Permuations of nucleotides on DNA account for many of the massive, massive reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true and is probably the #1 reason evolution cannot be true!!! Remember, this is one of the things that humans cannot do!!! Scientists can create DNA, but they cannot sequence it!!!
Here again is my article on "Permutations" if you didn't read it the first time:
Use your mental calculator and do the math: The "bottom line" is that imaginary evolution plus mindless accidents collectively have an I.Q. of ZERO!! Humans should not exist!!! GOD WINS!!!
|
|
The Physical ConstantsNow let's talk about some serious science that will blow your mind!!! This is definitely something that Superman did not do!!!! I am sure that the people at M.I.T., and other schools, would agree. These guys and girls are smart!! This section will talk about the physical constants in our Universe. The atheists and evolutionists are very well aware that this is a MAJOR, MAJOR PROBLEM for the theory of evolution!! The reason is that the probabilities that the pure accidents of the theory of evolution could have created the correct SET of physical constants for our Universe by pure accident, are so bad that sometimes the atheists and evolutionists claim there have been an infinite number of Universes and our Universe just happened to have the right set of physical constants in physics in order to create a viable Universe and none of the other Universes did have the correct set of physical constants so those Universes no longer exist!!! There probably are an infinite number of Universes, but rest assured that if there are, every one of them was created by God (or by someone He delegated the authority and power) and every one of them has the correct set of physical constants and every Universe has life on many of its planets!!! Without physical constants there would not be a Universe for us to live on!!! Well, without the force that creates the physical constants, which almost certainly is Tesla's aether there would not be a Universe for us to live on. I should note that Tesla is blacklisted in physics books and journals because of all of the corrupt "scientists" who hate Tesla and love Einstein because Tesla was a heck of a lot smarter than Einstsein!!! But perhaps more importantly Tesla could create free energy, which the money-powers did not appreciate.
Slowly page all the way down to the very bottom of this very important article from M.I.T.: Do you really think that Superman or the "flying spaghetti monster" flew around the Universe and created the physical constants in physics??? It gets better.
Here is an amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing YouTube video which does not mention anywhere near as many items as the M.I.T. document, but it is REQUIRED WATCHING because it quotes scientists and demonstrates, in six minutes, the amazing accuracy that some of the physical constants must have. He also talks about the "Multiverse" and flatly rejects this option as a "cop out" (my words): This guy hit the nail on the head!!! What he says is an absolute proof that God is alive and well and that God had to exist BEFORE our Universe came to exist!!! So we now have two reasons that God had to exist before our Universe existed - the Big Bang and the physical constants. Of course, the atheists and evolutionists have to come up with something so they can claim that there is no God. That is the "Multiverse" that he explained. We don't know how many Universes there are, but every one of them has the correct set of physical constants!!! I typed the word "multiverse" into Google and got 13,300,000 hits. The atheists really, really, really don't like God!!!!! Many scientists will do anything to avoid mentioning God!!!
More On Cell Biology And Microbiology"Cell Biology" is essentially the study of the cells that exist in animals and plants. "Microbiology" is the study of single-celled organisms (i.e. microorganisms). Every cell is vastly more sophisticated than anything ever made by humans as I have already mentioned!!! In Darwin's day it was possible to believe in the theory of evolution because scientists in his day knew nothing about DNA (DNA was discovered in 1953) and they knew nothing about the physical constants and they knew almost nothing about cells. But today, with what is known about DNA, the physical constants and cells, the theory of evolution is complete and absolute nonsense!! Remember the quote I mentioned above about the complexity of cells. Michael Denton did not say there was one such sequence of chemical chain reactions in cells, but "tens of thousands" of such systems!!! You should see the size of my cell biology books!!! One of my Cell Biology books (Essential Cell Biology, third edition) has 9 authors and has a glossary with more than 900 terms!!! I wish I was smart enough to understand that book.
Here is an entire article on Cell Biology (you could call it an introduction to an introduction [60 more times] to Cell Biology and Microbiology). The good news is that it links to some really cool YouTube videos: Some day I hope to find a Cell Biologist or Microbiologist who will write a few articles on why cell biology (or even microbiology) is a proof that the theory of evolution is false. These people are smart!!! You would know that if you ever tried to read a graduate school textbook in cell biology or microbiology!!!! The problem is that no one would understand their articles!!! More on cell biology from time to time.
Religion And EvolutionBecause the theory of evolution is nothing but a claim that there is no God, you might guess that religion and evolution do not mix very well. You would be right!!! There is a very specific reason why the atheists and evolutionists use the meaningless word "evolution" instead of the correct word "accidents." The reason is that ultimately, the purpose of the theory of evolution is to get people to not believe in God. The term "evolution" sounds more scientific than "atheism" or "accidents". In Elder Holland's talk, which I mentioned above, he talks about the massive benefits that religion has provided the world over the centuries. But he also talks about secularism.
Let me quote one of the definitions of "secularism": The indifference to, or rejection or exclusion of, religion and religious considerations. As a philosophy, secularism seeks to interpret life on principles taken solely from the material world, without recourse to religion." Secularism is atheism with a bad attitude!!! "Secularism" is not only the antithesis of religion, but it can proactively attack religion!! Elder Holland's talk is against secularism!!! Elder Holland wants governments to be more and more connected to religion. Not any specific religion (that would be unconstitutional in most countries), but religion in general!!! He mentions many great people over the centuries who have, in some cases, given their lives to spead a belief in God (and in a belief in freedom of religion). In his speech he talks a lot about many great people!!!
If you didn't watch his talk before, watch it now:: If I had to summarize his main point in one paragraph, this is what I would say: "Religion has been the driving force for good throughout the centuries and the proper role of government is to preserve and protect freedom of religion for all religions!!! In some instances, a religion needs to be protected from another religion (or from non-religious groups)!!! Governments should not take sides in such a dispute but should make sure that no religion is harmed in any way by those in the other religion (or non-religious group)." The very foundation of religion is to promote a belief in God. On the other hand, the theory of evolution is designed to try and obliterate all religions!! President Nelson (the president of the Mormon church) and Elder Holland (one of the apostles in the Mormon church) have both been openly critical of the theory of evolution.
In fact, many top leaders of the Mormon church, over the years, have been critical of the theory of evolution. Please spend 23 minutes watching this excellent YouTube video put together by Vincent Newmeyer which has short video clips of many former and current leaders of the LDS church regarding the theory of evolution:
By the way, there is a spectacular set of short non-denominational YouTube videos on the life of Christ made by the LDS church (i.e. the "Mormon" church or officially "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints"), which are free and online!!! Anyone of any Christian religion will love them as they are totally non-denominational and purely out of the Bible:
Latter-Day Saint Section (And Anyone Else)What started out as a large section of links to Latter-Day Saint articles (e.g. Mormon articles) on this home page has now turned into its own article to keep this home page from getting way too long. This article has many links to general conference talks, etc. etc. This article is required reading for Latter-Day Saints but even for non-Mormons there is a lot of information relative to the Bible!!
Here are just three of the many links to other articles which are mentioned in this article:
So here is the article, LDS Section, which will open in a new page:
The LDS Scholar article is someone similar but it does have some addition comments. It also has a test question for LDS scholars and every one of them will have the wrong answer to this test question:
Measuring The Damage Caused By The Theory of Evolution Being Taught In SchoolsWhile the theory of evolution versus creation science debate is heated, the debate is far more than academic because many students are victims of this battle!! As a result of the teaching of evolution in many schools, countless middle school, high school and college students have lost their belief in God or they may question their belief in God. Fortunately, the damage done by evolution can be measured. Studies funded by the very well known evangelical creationist Ken Ham organization have shown that most of the loss of testimony of God occurs in middle school and high school, not in college!! Ken Ham's conclusion, based on statistics, is that many students are already gone by the time they get to college!! Remember those two words for a minute. But of course, those who still have a testimony of God when they enter college will have that testimony challenged in college depending on what courses they take and what university they attend. I should also note that the evangelicals do not have the Pearl of Great Price scriptures of the Mormon church. Many things in the early chapters of Genesis were damaged (i.e. poor translations, lost documents, injected bias, etc.) over the many centuries between when the early chapters of Genesis were originally written and today. The Pearl of Great Price exists largely to "fix" the damage done to the early chapters of Genesis. So I do not fault the evangelicals for some of their statements, they are good people.
Here is a link to the Ken Ham video: "Already Gone - Part 1" (22 minutes):
If you were not automatically taken to Part 2 - here is "Already Gone - Part 2" (20 minutes): In these two videos he has some brilliant comments about Noah's Ark!!! He makes it clear that Noah's Ark was plenty big enough to save every species that God wanted to save (and even too big). I sometimes wonder whether the flood was designed to kill-off some of the 9 million now-extinct species along with many very wicked humans.
Natural Selection"Natural selection" is the claim that stronger species survive and weaker species may not survive. Natural selection is perfectly true. However, "natural selection" is frequently used as "evidence" for the theory of evolution. However, I should note that "natural selection" has never created a new species!!! And natural selection never makes a species stronger!! Natural selection can only eliminate weak species WHICH ALREADY EXIST which are killed via environment (e.g. starvation) or they are killed by other species. Natural selection is only effective when two or more species already exist!!! In other words, natural selection is purely an elimination process that eliminates weak species!! Natural selection is not a creation process!!! In other words, natural selection reduces the number of species on a planet, it never increases the number of species on a planet!!! Let me say that last part again: natural selection reduces the number of species on a planet!!! Remember, there are nine million extinct animal species which have lived on this planet. Some may have gone extinct because of weather changes, others may have gone extinct because some other species killed them off or because their food supply was cut-off or because of Noah's flood. Sometimes the atheists and evolutionists use the validity of natural selection as "evidence" for the theory of evolution. But natural selection is NOT evidence for evolution because it is only an elimination process!!! For example, you may hear the phrase: "evolution by natural selection." I just did a Google search on that phrase and got 819,00 hits!!! How can that many people be so stupid!!! Well, because they hear it from others and repeat it because it sounds cool. Natural Selection is perfectly true, but it is purely an elimination process!!! The phrase "evolution by natural selection" is nothing but an oxymoron after the discovery of DNA!! However, the only thing that natural selection does is eliminate weak species!!! The claim that natural selection is "evidence" for evolution" is paradoxical!! NATURAL SELECTION WORKS AGAINST EVOLUTION. Evolution is "trying" to create new and improved species (which it has never done) and natural selection is trying to eliminate existing species (which it does all the time)!!! Let me repeat that: NATURAL SELECTION WORKS AGAINST EVOLUTION. Evolution is "trying" to create new and improved species (which it has never done) and natural selection is trying to eliminate existing species (which it does all the time)!!! Natural selction will easily win that battle because natural selection does not have to deal with the statistics of creating new DNA. A problem with natural selection is that because DNA cannot be created and sequenced by evolution, natural selection should have nothing to do because there should not be any species to "select" from!! But given that God has created millions of species of animals, natural selection is a perfectly valid scientific concept!!! Remember, while natural selection is a valid concept, IT IS ONLY AN ELIMINATION PROCESS. Some people might claim that natural selection increases the overall quality of species on this planet by eliminating the weak species. That is true, but do not infer from this that natural selection can create a single new species!!!
This article will go into great detail about why Natural Selection has absolutely nothing to do with evolution:
Important Notes Before Going On To The Second Major Section Of This Home PageYou are more than half way done with the home page but there are a few things I need to mention. Note #1: When I realize that I have made a mistake (e.g. for a long time I thought that DNA is what solely controlled cell divisions) it can take a year or more before I get around to updating and fixing all of the articles that have this mistake!!! So you will be seeing articles or chapters of books on this website which mention that DNA controls cell divisions for many months to come!!! Note #2: Don't Forget: please, please, please tell your friends about this website, such as via social media or email or by putting a link to this website on your website. There is no other website on the Internet even close to this website on the subject of why the theory of evolution cannot be true!!! G.o.o.g,l,e is a piece of garbage from the perspective of those who have websites. G.o,o.g,l.e has no clue which websites are good and which websites are subject-matter expert websites!! While I do get a few hits from G.o.o.g,l,e, I can assure you they are very, very rare given the size of this website. So it is up to YOU to spread the word on social media, emails, etc.!!! Every once in awhile I do get more hits from social media than I get from search engines!!! WAY TO GO - THANKS!!!!
Note #3: The original purpose of this website was to host a free eBook. Well, now there are four free eBooks on this website. Here is a link to these books when you get around to them: The [and one article] mentioned in that prior link is for an article which lists more than 400 reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true. It is an old article but I suspect the vast majority of it is still accurate. Let the second section of this home page begin.
More On The Sophistication Of Human DNAThe human DNA strand is seven feet long, but it is coiled up to fit inside of a cell that cannot be seen with the naked eye!!! This DNA strand is combined with, and used by, the spirit of the new baby. The new baby is made of roughly 37.2 trillion cells which includes 60,000 miles of blood vessels, etc. I do not know why spirits would have blood vessels, but maybe they do?? Or maybe that is one of those DNA things the spirit doesn't deal with. The 60,000 miles of blood vessels in this newborn baby would wrap around the earth at the equator twice, with 10,000 miles of blood vessels left over!! When the baby is born he or she will have an incredible brain which is connected to a massive nervous system, a skull to protect the brain, a spine to protect the spinal cord (which is a cylindrical bundle of nerve fibers), two eyes which are connected to the nervous system which can see in 3-D, a beating heart, a liver, a pancreas, 300 bones (which eventually fuse into 206 bones), etc. etc.!! The DNA in a sperm cell of the father of the baby contributes part of the DNA for the new baby and the DNA in the mother's ovum (egg) contributes part of the DNA for the new baby. The DNA strands include databases from the mother and father which must align with each other and are accessed by the spirit of the new baby!!! But it is even more complicated than that. Men actually have two types of DNA strands: the DNA in the "male sperm cells" which will lead to a male baby and the DNA in the "female sperm cells" which will lead to a female baby. The DNA in the mother's egg/ovum is gender-neutral. So if a male sperm cell penetrates the mother's egg first (along with its DNA), a male baby will result. If a female sperm cell penetrates the mother's egg first (along with its DNA), a female baby will result. The sex of the baby is literally a swimming race of sperm cells to penetrate the ovum first!!
Comparing DNA To Computer Programs (To The Extent That DNA Controls Cell Divisions)
The process of writing real computer programs can teach us a lot about the process of evolution which has supposedly written new and improved DNA millions of times (to create new and improved species). In other words, if computer programmers wrote computer programs the way that evolution must sequence DNA strands (using nothing but mindless accidents), there would be no functional computer programs on this planet!!! But of course evolution has the added burden (which computer programmers do not have) of aligning the DNA of four DNA computer programs (i.e. four DNA strands) with each other when creating a new species from an old species. The father's two new DNA strands (when creating a new species) and the mothers two new DNA strands must align with each other at the function level, and these four DNA strands must be exactly the same length in each section!!! I would like to see a computer programmer who can create four computer programs which create four binary strings (i.e. four complied computer programs) which are very different, yet they can align with each other (at the function level) and all four of the binary programs are exactly the same length!!! Then try to write new computer programs by using nothing but random number generators (to simulate "evolution")!!! Yet for every species of animals all four DNA strands must be unique at the DNA level (i.e. the object code level) and they must align with each other at the function level meaning they must be the same length at the function level!!! Nor could computer programmers write two computer programs (a "male" and "female" computer program) which could get together and create (by themselves) a new computer program!!! What computer programmer would want to write two computer programs that could do that!!!?? But what if computer programmers had the same requirements/techniques as evolution to create four new and improved computer programs using the techniques of "evolution"?? Suppose four computer programmers were given the same assignment but they were not allowed to communicate with each other. This simulates the claim of evolution that there is no intelligence in evolution.
The object code (or compiled code) can only be written by accidents (i.e. random number generators) and when these four programs are done, the object codes of the four massively complex, but written by different random number generators, must meet these requirements: The computer programmers would not like these unusual, added requirements!! But "evolution" has these same problems plus other problems. When evolution creates DNA it would be like a random number generator writing object code (i.e. compiled code) for four highly sophisticated computer programs which must align with each other at the subroutine level (i.e. funtional level of DNA) and be exactly the same length in each section of DNA and the same length overall!!! Well, yes DNA is primarily a database but the issue is the same. For example, suppose evolution/accidents created a new male human DNA strand (inside the first sperm cell - to create the male). But what if the DNA created by evolution for the second male DNA strand (inside the second male sperm cell - to create the female) only had 99% of the length of the DNA for the first male sperm cell?? And what if the female DNA strand for the first ovum was only 97% as long as the DNA for the first male sperm cell?? And what if the female DNA strand for the second ovum was only 95% as long as the DNA for the second male sperm cell??
We wouldn't be here!!! Let us define a "field" to be a very specific segment of DNA which creates a very specific enzyme or has some other very specific function needed by the cell. A human DNA strand would require many more "fields" than a bonobo DNA strand would need, such as in the creation of the human brain. The probability that four randomly created human DNA strands (randomly created by the pure accidents of evolution by modifying bonobo DNA), after millions of changes to their original bonobo DNA, would have the same new sequences of nucleotides (i.e. the same fields), in the same order as each other, and the same length as each other and that all four DNA strands would align at the function level is total nonsense!! This certainly would not be the case when the human brain was created from a bonobo brain. My point is that the four DNA strands WOULD NOT EVEN HAVE THE SAME LENGTH!!! In other words, if four bonobo DNA strands "evolved" into four human DNA strands, the "fields" would not be the same "fields" and the "fields" would not be in the same location and in the same order (because everything was done randomly) and the lengths of the four new human DNA strands would not be the same length which alone guarantees that the "fields" would not align with each other!!! I don't know how long bonobo DNA is, but the point is that human DNA and bonobo DNA are probably not the same length. Plus, DNA is "irreducibly complex," meaning every section and sequence has to work the first time!!! THE REQUIREMENT THAT THESE VASTLY DIFFERENT DNA STRANDS MUST ALIGN WITH EACH OTHER AT THE FUNCTION LEVEL IS ONE OF THE MASSIVE, MASSIVE REASONS THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION CANNOT BE TRUE!!!! Anyone with a functional knowledge of permutations and statistics would immediately know that God is alive and well!!! Yes, God is smart!!! The good news is that because our spirits are His "children" He is on our side and He loves us and He actually wants us to succeed!!! Rest assured of that!!!
|
|
Common AncestorsThe concept of "common ancestor" is totally based on the belief that DNA can be changed!!! For example, it is thought by many that humans have a "common ancestor" with chimpanzees (AKA: "Chimpanzee - Human Last Common Ancestor" or CHLCA) because some segments of DNA of chimpanzees and humans are very similar. Well, our DNA does have something in common with bonobo DNA. We have a common designer!!! Computer programmers reuse subroutines all the time!!! When God designed the DNA for humans and chimpanzees He may have used some sections of DNA more than once. God is efficient. I don't know whether He designed humans first or chimpanzees first. This method is common, for example, with those who design automobiles as they would occasionally use common parts from an old model car in the new model car. This saves money for the automobile manufacturer. Or there could be other reasons God (or some of His children He assigned the task) used "common parts" on DNA. The point is that the fact that DNA cannot be changed (to create a new species from an old species) is VERY IMPORTANT when thinking about the claims of the atheists and evolutionists. This is just an example of how the atheists and evolutionists assume evolution is true without thinking about the issues.
A Little More About CellsI wasn't kidding when I said that a team of cell biologists could create a website several times larger than this website just talking about cells!!! Thousands of scientists have PhD degrees in "Cell Biology" or Microbiology!! Cells are not simple!! So how could a PhD in Cell Biology or Microbiology think for one instant that cells, and what goes on inside of cells, were created purely by accidents!!!
Here is an article with videos about the sophistication of cells - very interesting stuff (this has some YouTube videos):
Here is the bottom line: the scientific evidence is overwhelming that accidents have not created a single cell or a single DNA strand!! Nor have accidents intelligently sequenced the nucleotides on any DNA strand!! The entire foundation of the theory of evolution is scientific nonsense!! Here is my article on Cell Biology and Microbiology, which I linked to above: Trust me: God is alive and well and He is a heck of a lot smarter than any of us!! And because we are His children (at the spirit level) we have a lot more potential that we can conceive now!!!
Join The Fight: Please Share This Website With Others!!Please share this amazing website with 15 or 20 of your friends on social media (e.g. Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, Pinterest, etc.) and ask your friends to share this site with 15 or 20 of their friends on social media!! Also, please link to this website from your website!! JOIN THE FIGHT!!!!! Until a few dozen people do these things this website might as well be classified as military-grade Top Secret because G_o.o,g,l.e will rank this website very, very low on the totem pole because G_o.o,g,l.e doesn't have a clue how good a website is as a subject-matter-expert website!! |
|
The Magnitude Of The Problems With The Theory Of EvolutionThe above items are just a few of the hundreds of scientific reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true which are discussed on this website. But I should emphasize that the MAGNITUDE of the reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true is simply beyond comprehension. The permutation issues of the DNA for several million species, all of which have both males and females, alone would eliminate any chance that the theory of evolution is true. And where are the failures of randomness??? And the construction of cells and DNA are other issues of such magnitude that the theory of evolution simply cannot be true. Do not look at each reason the theory of evolution cannot be true as being equal with the other reasons. Some reasons are massive enough, by themselves to make the theory of evolution completely ludicrous!!! Now I want to make it very clear that many students have been fooled by the atheists and evolutionists. This is nothing to be ashamed of!!! The atheists and evolutionists have perfected the art of deception, they are well-organized, very well-funded and their deceptions are highly polished!!! Atheists don't want a God to exist because a God would be massively smarter than they are. So most of them do everything in their vivid imaginations to pretend there is no God and to claim that everything in the Universe came to exist by pure chance. God is replaced by mindless accidents.
Here is an article with more than 400 reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true which I link to from time to time:
What A Student Should Not Do!!So what should a student do when they realize the theory of evolution is complete scientific nonsense (and I am just beginning)? It is definitely not advisable for a student to argue with their teacher, but there is nothing wrong with a student quietly going "online" and learning the truth about the absurdity of the theory of evolution because of the sophistication of DNA and the sophistication of the cells that the DNA resides inside of, among many other reasons (e.g. the physical constants and the Universe). Just quietly, and low key, spread the word among your friends. Definitely mention this website if a teacher gets involved. Have your teacher email me if they have any questions or comments (my email address address is at the bottom of this home page). I will be happy to answer his or her questions and I would appreciate their comments.
Evolution After The "First Living Cell" (A Major Section!!!)
Life on this earth had to start with a single cell if evolution were true. So let us first talk about the credibility of the "first living cell" theory as claimed by the atheists and evolutionists: Evolutionists claim that the DNA of the first human male and the DNA of the first human female "evolved" independently over millions of years, from the same "first living cell," by a series of accidents called "evolution"!!! But to do this each new male and new female of a new species had to "evolve" in the same latitude, longitude and timeframe!!! This just adds to the headaches of evolution!!! We know that human DNA is 3,200,000,000 nucleotides long. Let us assume that the length of the "first living cell" was 10,000 nucleotides long. At an average increase in length of 15,000 nucleotides for each new species, there would be 213,333 species between the "first living cell" and human DNA!!! This is an insane claim of the atheists/evolutionists considering all of the problems with creating a single new species from an existing species!!! And at some point male DNA and female DNA had to "evolve" together from there on. And remember it takes four new and improved DNA strands to create a new and improved animal species!! How did the DNA of the first human father and the DNA of the first human mother "evolve" together from the "first living cell?" How were the 4 DNA strands synchronized, for each species after slightly improved species, as the DNA of the males and females evolved independently for millions of years?? I don't think the atheists and evolutionists are very good at mathematics. Here is another problem: suppose the male DNA evolved slightly faster (say 1% faster) than the female DNA evolved (or vice versa). Within many thousands of years of new species, their DNA would not align and they would not have been able to have any children that survived because their DNA was not compatible!! That species would be the end of evolution for that line. Male DNA and female DNA had to be designed by God, for each species with a male and female!! Evolution could never have designed two massively sophisticated computer programs/databases (DNA) that could be integrated together to create a third computer program (a baby who has features of both parents). And evolution certainly could not have done it in the same timeframe and same locations on the earth. You will never see the above few paragraphs in a science book or biology book at the high school or college level!!! No author is ever going to ask me for permission to use information from my website!!! The evolution debate is not about science, it is about God. If you assume God does not exist, or if you believe God does not exist, you will likely believe in the theory of evolution no matter how absurd it is. And you will use your vivid imagination to explain how evolution did so many things. Unfortunately, many people who believed in God have been tricked into believing in evolution. In fact, that is the precise purpose of the highly sophisticated deceptions of the atheists and evolutionists (and I have only talked about a few of their deceptions on this home page) and why it is taught in most schools, but not all schools. In some private schools, owned by a religious group, "creation science" or "intelligent design" is taught and in other schools there are disclaimers about evolution. Here is an interesting idea that school administrators should consider: TEACHING SCIENTIFIC FACTS INSTEAD OF TEACHING SCIENCE FICTION!!!!!! Wow, what a novel idea - who would have thought about teaching good science instead of scientific fantasies in the classrooms?? Let me repeat that because I am serious about this issue: Here is an interesting idea that school administrators should consider: TEACHING SCIENTIFIC FACTS INSTEAD OF TEACHING SCIENCE FICTION!!!!!! Wow, what a novel idea - who would have thought about teaching good science instead of scientific fantasies in the classrooms?? Biology is no longer about science, it is about creative thinking as to how every discovery in science can be attributed to the theory of evolution (i.e. "without God") in order to get more converts to atheism. Atheists are not interested in truth, they are only interested in getting converts to atheism. One of the key deceptions of the atheists and evolutionists, to get converts, is their definition of the term "species." They define the term "species" in such a way that each "variety" of dog is a different "species." To them a Chihuahua and a Great Dane are different "species." This gives them the latitude to claim that they have observed a new "species" form and that evolution is therefore true!!! But if the term "unique species" is defined to be a "unique DNA structure" then they have never seen a new "species" be created!!!! Nor will they ever see a new species be created by accidents or by the human breeding of animals. The atheists and evolutionists don't like to talk about DNA, they like to tell stories and use deceptions, such as by using very clever deceptive definitions. Seven chapters in one of the free eBooks on this website are devoted to deceptive definitions!!! In addition, the atheists must claim the entire Universe was created by accident!! How could the atheists and evolutionists claim that the entire Universe was created by accident instead of by God? Well, they had to come up with some "accident" that they claimed could create the Universe, including the superclusters of clusters of galaxies. So the atheists invented the concept of a purely accidental "Big Bang." They want you to believe that an accidental explosion (remember, it had to be an accident) created the Universe. I don't think so. Yes there was a Big Bang but the object that exploded had to contain all of the atoms in the Universe!!! Only God could have pulled that off!!! Yes, the Big Bang really did happen, that is not the issue. The issue is how did the object that exploded get created and how did this incredibly dense object explode?? There is NO LAW IN PHYSICS that says the more dense a solid object is, the easier it is to explode!! Well, the most incredibly dense object that ever existed had to spontaneously explode for the Big Bang to be an accident!!! I don't think so!!! Someone lit the fuse then ran like hell!!! What sidewalk would they be running away on??? Nope, no one ran away, either God did it or someone He authorized to do it did it.
Cell Biology Books, Some Written By Creation ScientistsI own a giant textbook on Cell Biology which is called: The World Of The Cell, Fourth Edition, by Becker, Kleinsmith and Hardin. This textbook is 845 pages. The term "species" does not show up in the Index!!! I also own a book called The Dictionary of Cell and Molecular Biology by J.M. Lackie. It is 725 pages and the print is small. There are clearly thousands of reasons the theory of accidents cannot be true due to the sophistication of cells; and this does not include the many issues created purely by the DNA in almost all cells!!
I also own two books which were written by "creation scientists" [yes, people who openly believe in God also write books] and I am sure there are other creation science books on this topic): These two men obviously believe that God had to create the many species on this earth because they could not have been created by accidents. Even microorganisms are far more sophisticated than any jet airplane on this planet!!!
What is Life? (Very Important Section)Let us look at the issue: "what is life?" For example, if you took a fish and left it out of the water until it died, and then an hour after it died you put it back into the water, why doesn't it come back to life? All of the raw elements for life (including all of the DNA and cells) are still functional and still in the fish, so why doesn't it come back to life? There is something more to "life" than just cells and oxygen and water. That would be a spirit. Furthermore, have the evolutionists and atheists ever proven that life can be created from non-life (i.e. inorganic materials)?? Never, never, never - yet they continue to preach atheism. While several attempts have been made to create life from non-life (e.g. Miller-Uray, Wong and Hartgerink), the scientists have not only failed to create life, they have also failed to prove it can be done!! For example, have scientists put a large shell over a pond, which had no life, meaning there was no DNA and no cells (this simulates "prebiotic" conditions, meaning "existing before life"), and observed "life" form by a series of accidents, including RNA or DNA inside of a "first living cell" (in that pond), that was alive and had the ability to divide itself into two cells (which would be required for complex life to evolve)? Never!! Even the "first living cell" had to divide into two cells (etc.) for life to perpetuate. How could something that simple divide?? The "warm pond" thing has no credibility. I don't think the temperature of the water can overcome the statistical problems with the theory of evolution. Then what is their evidence for evolution? Their only evidence is that many scientists are very arrogant and they do not believe in God and thus they have no choice except to use their God-given brains to deceive people into believing that everything in the Universe, including human DNA, occurred by chance. But the theory of evolution should have been thrown in the trash can when DNA was discovered and when the complexity of cells was also discovered. Yet, as scientists learn more and more about DNA and cells, the atheists continue to cling to the theory of evolution as if it were still 1859, when Darwin's first book was published. Every new discovery leads to a new fairy tale to tell. The only thing that is "evolving" on this planet is the theory of evolution as evolutionists/atheists constantly need to develop new spin to account for the new discoveries about the sophistication of cells, the morphing of the embryo algorithms on DNA, etc.
Can Accidents Or Simplicity Create Complexity?As one example of complexity, the human eyes are unbelievable in complexity. Yet the sections on human DNA which create the human eyes must be far more complex than the eyes themselves (this is assuming there are no spirits)!! And the intelligence who designed the DNA (God) must be far more complex than the DNA itself!! In other words, simplicity never creates complexity. Intelligence is top-down, not bottom-up!!! Let me repeat that, simplicity never creates complexity. Intelligence is top-down, not bottom-up!!! To understand these concepts, consider these items: First, consider that a human-designed computer program exists because of the human intelligence to write the computer program, the human intelligence to write the computer language, the human intelligence to write the computer language compiler, the human intelligence to design and build the microprocessor, including designing and building the memory chips, etc. Second, consider the output of the computer program which is printed on a piece of paper. How can the printout on the piece of paper be more sophisticated than the human intelligence needed to write the computer program, to write the computer language, etc.?? It can't!! Let's think about the memory chips. I have a son who retired from working for a company that makes memory chips. At times he would be sitting in a very, very large room, by himself, with more than a billion dollars worth of equipment needed to make memory chips!! The memory chips cannot be more complex than the machines that made them, and the machines that made them cannot be more complex than the humans who designed them!! Simplicity cannot create complexity!! There is no functional, useful machine on this planet that was not designed and built by human beings!! Let me repeat that: There is no functional, useful machine on this planet that was not designed and built by human beings!! Yet the atheists and evolutionists claim that all DNA, which is far more sophisticated than any human-built machine, was created and sequenced by accidents!!! Consider the sophistication of DNA such that it creates a person's brain. Let us think about a pianist. A pianist must be able to convert thousands on dots on a sheet of music into the movements of their fingers!! To do this the DNA must create the nerves between their eyes and their brain, then the brain must process these dots and then the brain sends signals to the fingers of the pianist. And the DNA must create the muscles on their fingers, etc. If all of this is in place, and with thousands of hours of practice, a pianist can play the Rachmaninoff Piano Concerto #3!! Many years ago I had a friend who, if you put sheet music in front of him that he had never seen before he could play this music immediately. If you put such a piece of sheet music in front of me, I wouldn't have the slightest clue how to play that piece of music!!! And most people would not do any better than I would. What created our DNA, which in turn created our brain, had to be far, far smarter than our DNA and our brain!!! That would be God. Accidents (i.e. evolution) have zero intelligence so how could accidents create something with intelligence? They can't!! Intelligence is a top-down process and someone a lot smarter than humans had to design human DNA and the DNA for every one of the several million species of animals on this planet which have or do exist, all of which have a male and female. Which is more intelligent: accidents or monkeys?? Think about that. Obviously monkeys. and the limit of monkey intelligence is far higher than the limit on accidents!!! But monkeys cannot design and create the DNA for an extinct species!!! Could accidents or monkeys design and build a Buick automobile? Of course not. It takes a lot of intelligence, including many different specialties, to build a Buick automobile. Only humans can build an automobile. Likewise, only God could create the DNA and cells for several million species of plants, animals and insects.
Article: Where Did God Come From??I talked about this before, but I have more comments. The truth is that God had to exist long before our Universe was created and our sun was created and this planet was prepared for earth life. So people naturally want to know where God came from!! Brigham Young, who was born in 1801 (Darwin was born in 1809), the second prophet of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (the Mormons), said this about the first cause of all things (i.e. where God came from):
And Brigham Young said this long before the discovery of other galaxies and the sophistication of DNA and cells were discovered!! In other words, there was a "First Cause" of all things - a beginning - but this beginning happened so long ago, and so many quadrillions of things have happened since then, that these events are far, far beyond human comprehension. By the way, the largest desert on this planet is 5.5 MILLION SQUARE MILES in size (the Antarctica Polar Desert)!! The Arctic Polar Desert is 5.4 MILLION SQUARE MILES in size!! And there are many other deserts. There are a lot of grains of sand on this planet for the ant to count!! If Brigham Young had known these two facts, and other facts about deserts, I doubt he would have changed his statement.
While Brigham Young did not know anything about DNA and he knew very little about the Universe in his day, he did understand the principle that the "first cause of all things" is beyond human comprehension. Brigham Young also said this about God:
This article is specifically about where God and the Universe came from:
Here is an article on astronomy:
A Summary and Overview Of Some Key IssuesSo far we have barely touched the surface of the reasons evolution cannot be true, yet even at this point we have no logical choice except to conclude that God exists. Different religions may have different beliefs about God, but there is no choice except to say that God does exist. In the Mormon religion (the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints) there are three separate Gods in the Godhead. The head God (Heavenly Father), the Savior (Jesus Christ) and the Holy Ghost. If scientists are so smart, and believe that God does not exist, can they create a Universe with a planet like Earth that has (though most are extinct) several million animal species which have both males and females? In fact, let's make it easy. Suppose a team of scientists are taken to a completely barren planet with no life on it. I will allow the planet to have an atmosphere and water. But there is no life on this planet, not even a bacteria. And I will allow the scientists to take anything with them that they want, as long as it is not alive. Can these scientists create life from non life?? Can they create species which are extinct on this planet (e.g. Woolly Mammoth), and so on?? The answer is 'no'!!! Scientists cannot do that even on this planet and they have dead Woolly Mammoths to look at and study!! How much of their DNA they can put together I do not know, but I know they have some DNA from Woolly Mammoths. The evolution debate is not about where bones came from, it is about where DNA came from!!! In other words, when you see fossils, think about the DNA that created these animals!! How did the "morphing of the embryo" algorithms come to exist for many, many complex species, especially when there is a male and female in the species? It is scarry to think that Woolley Mammoths have spirits that I might run into in the "spirit world"!!!
Well, we now know that it is not the DNA that is controlling the morphing of the embryo (i.e. cell divisions), it is the spirit of the person or animal that is controlling the morphing of the embryo and DNA is a database for the spirit. See this article on the "Sixteen Cells Paradox" if you have not read it by now: In that article, even before I talk about spirits I talk about why DNA cannot control the cell divisions. In fact, it was when I realized that DNA cannot control cell divisions that I started looking for what did control them. Humans certainly cannot create spirits. They can't even see one unless God allows it!!! It is far beyond the scope of this home page to talk about many subjects. But trust me: the probability of a viable permutation of nucleotides, to create both a male and female for a single advanced species (the permutation of nucleotides on the DNA would have to be almost perfect in order to perform the morphing of the embryo for both a male and female offspring, even if it is primarily a database). The issue of permutations of nucleotides is the real death of the theory of evolution!!!!! This is not an issue that can be "explained away" with fancy story telling and vivid imaginations!!! It is pure mathematics!!!! The statistical problems created by permutations of nucleotides make the theory of evolution look very, very bad!!! Here is an interesting question: which came first the cell or the DNA inside that cell?? If the DNA came first, how did a cell get created and then the DNA get put inside of this cell without damaging the cell?? If the cell came first, there is nothing inside of a cell that can create a DNA strand or even modify it.
In summary, here are just a few reasons evolution (i.e. accidents) could never have created human beings: Just ask any computer programmer how long it would take to write a complex computer program using code written exclusively by random number generators. It would never happen!! So if humans cannot design and create from scratch DNA or RNA, plus a cell for the DNA or RNA to exist inside, and give their new cell "life," with a new spirit and a viable permutation of nucleotides to provide information for the spirit, why would anyone believe that a series of pure accidents (i.e. evolution) could have created the "first living cell" in a sterile pond? Yet that is what students hear in school and almost everywhere else they look. Many reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true are mentioned in various other articles on this website, such as the "Twenty-Five Reasons The Theory of Evolution Cannot Be True" article.
The Evolution DebateWhile there are more than 350 books which are favorable to the theory of evolution there are also many books which are strongly critical of the theory of evolution!! There are also many YouTube videos on both sides of the debate. Those who are critical of the theory of evolution are called "creation scientists" or "creationists" or "intelligent design" people because they believe the scientific data favors a "Creator" of the Universe. In fact, if you want to get published in a leading biology journal you better be an atheist and your article better support the theory of evolution. If it does not praise evolution your article will end up in the trash can, not in a "science" journal!!! From the incomprehensible sophistication of DNA, to the amazing complexity of cells, to the earth we live on, to the ends of the Milky Way Galaxy, to the furthest galaxy cluster and supercluster (by the way, the supercluster we live in is called the Laniakea Supercluster Of Galaxies), and considering the "constants" in physics (e.g. the gravitational constant); the credibility of the theory of evolution has dropped to ABSOLUTE ZERO!!!
Other Anti-Evolution BooksIf you listen to the propaganda of the pro-evolution monopoly you might think that anyone who believes in creation science is a dolt. Nothing could be further from the truth. There are many "creation scientists" (i.e. those who believe God created this Universe) who are brilliant and have no problems seeing through the false science generated by the scientific establishment. In fact, many anti-evolution books have been written by brilliant scientists. This listing of anti-evolution books and DVDs contains only a small sampling of the anti-evolution books which exist in print. In fact, there are more than 200 anti-evolution books. Many of the books were written by PhDs in the sciences. The arguments in these books totally shred the theory of evolution from a scientific standpoint. Some of these books may be out of print and you may have to use a book finder, such as Alibris, to find them.
Here is a link to this appendix (some of these books may push a specific religious denomination): If you know of any book or CD that needs to be added, let me know. If you have read this far: pat yourself on the back!!!!! Good job, now go and tell many others!!!!!
|
