• NOTE: This website contains two free eBooks and many free articles.

Prophets Or Evolution?

While there are more than 250 books which are favorable to the theory of evolution (written by "evolutionists," most of whom are atheists), there are also more than 250 books which are strongly critical of the theory of evolution (written by "creationists" or "creation scientists")!!

At the center of the evolution debate is the existence of God. The leading atheists and evolutionists don't want people to believe in God so they claim that God was not necessary for the Universe to exist or for human DNA to exist, as just two of many examples.

But human DNA is so sophisticated that scientists don't have a clue what the vast majority of it does. They only understand about 3% of human DNA after studying it since 1953!!!

From the incomprehensible sophistication of DNA to the complexity of cells to the furthest galaxy cluster, the credibility of the theory of evolution has dropped to ZERO!!!

There is not a remote chance the theory of evolution is true as the two free eBooks and many articles on this website demonstrate over and over again. But these books and articles cover many topics, such as uncovering the sophisticated tactics of deception the atheists use to get converts to atheism.

So let us begin:

Human DNA, for a male and female, are literally the two most sophisticated computer programs on this planet, by a very, very wide margin!!!

At conception, the single fertilized egg in the new mother does not contain a brain or a liver or kidneys, etc., rather the DNA, inside the fertilized egg, contains the incomprehensible instructions to CREATE, via 30 billion cell divisions, a baby who has 30 billion cells which include: 60,000 miles of blood vessels, a brain, liver, heart, kidneys, 206 bones, etc.!!!

Creation scientists claim that accidents (i.e. evolution) could never have created the DNA for an ant, much less the DNA for humans!!

As if the sophistication of DNA weren't enough of a proof that God lives, the cells that DNA resides in are also massively too sophisticated to have come to exist by a series of accidents. Scores of scientists get PhDs in "Cell Biology" every year!! If cells were simple, why would people get PhDs for studying them? More will be said about cells below.

So why do the atheists/evolutionists claim that random accidents (i.e. evolution) created the human DNA strands and the cells they reside in? Are they really bad at biology and statistics?

Actually, the atheists don't care how absurd the theory of evolution is, they are looking to get converts to atheism. That is precisely why there are so many books which are favorable to the theory of evolution.

But how can someone claim that the theory of evolution is true when the theory of evolution was destroyed by the discovery of DNA in 1953??

The answer is deception. The atheists/evolutionist have mastered the art of deception.

One of the many tactics of deception they use is to create very clever "definitions" which imply that there is evidence for the theory of evolution.

An article, which is linked to below, goes very deep into the deceptive definitions which have been created by the atheists/evolutionists to deceive people into believing in evolution. The article is called: "Why The Confusion About Evolution?".

Of course, many atheists and students would ask: "If God created all of these things, then where did God come from?" I will answer that question with a question: "Could a mouse get a PhD in Cell Biology?" No!! Likewise, human beings cannot even remotely comprehend the origin of God!! I will actually talk more about this issue later.

My point is that the claims of the atheists are nonsense. Accidents don't create vast and sophisticated intelligence. Only God could have designed and created the world's two most sophisticated computer programs: human male DNA and human female DNA!!

Let us talk next about the most amazing part of human DNA: the "morphing of the embryo" algorithms.

The "Morphing of the Embryo" Algorithms

I call the computer algorithms on the DNA of the fertilized egg, which morphs a single cell into a crying baby, via 30 billion cell divisions, the "morphing of the embryo" algorithms.

The "morphing of the embryo" algorithms on DNA, as one example, need to make sure that the 60,000 miles of blood vessels are fully enclosed before blood starts to circulate or else the baby would bleed to death before it was born!!

Thus, the "morphing of the embryo" algorithms on the DNA inside the fertilized egg must make sure the cells in the new baby are the correct types of cells (and there are 200 different types of cells), and each type of cell must be in the correct locations, at all times during the morphing of the embryo, and the cells must be created in the correct order (e.g. to prevent bleeding).

In other words, the DNA must not only control what the baby will look like, but it also must control everything that happens from conception to creating a baby and even while the child grows to be an adult.

How the spirit of the human may be involved in the "morphing of the embryo," versus what the DNA does, is unknown. But the atheists reject both God and the existence of the human spirit.

But no matter how the spirit and DNA work together to handle the necessary tasks, no team of human beings on this earth can even remotely understand the algorithms on human DNA, much less design them from scratch!!!

And if humans cannot even begin to comprehend these algorithms, they certainly were not created by a series of accidents!!

And don't forget that every species of plant and animal on this planet also has unique DNA that had to have been created by accident according to the atheists!!

So how can the atheists be correct in saying that billions of accidents (i.e. evolution) created the 3.2 billion nucleotides which are on the DNA, which is inside of almost every cell, in every human being? Their claim is nonsense.

Here is another question. How could a species which did not have a male and female "evolve" into a species which had both a male and female? It could never happen!! Evolution could never have created a species with both a male and female which in turn could have both a male and female child.

The theory of evolution may have made sense in 1859 (when Darwin wrote his first book), almost a century before the discovery of DNA in 1953, but today the theory of evolution is a pure fantasy!!!

There is no possible way the two most sophisticated computer programs on earth, by a wide margin, male human DNA and female human DNA, could have been created by a series of pure accidents (i.e. by evolution)!!

Furthermore, male DNA and female DNA not only had to be on the earth in the same timeframe and same latitude and longitude (so the human race could be started and perpetuated), but the male DNA and female DNA had to align in such a way that they could have at least one male baby and one female baby!! But how could their DNA have aligned if their DNA had been created by accident, independently of each other?!!

Let us ask another question: where does the blood for the baby come from? It comes from the blood of the mother. Your homework assignment tonight is to figure out how the blood gets from the mother to the baby as the 60 thousand miles of blood vessels are being formed.

The complex process by which blood gets from the mother to the baby could not have "evolved" because it had to work perfectly before the first baby was born on this planet or else no human baby would ever have been born alive on this planet.

And these same issues apply to every species that has both a male and female (e.g. camels).

Article: When There Are 16 Cells During the Morphing of the Embryo

It is not just the computer algorithms on the DNA that control the "morphing of the embryo" that are incomprehensible; it is the way that the morphing algorithms work!!

In fact, it is insulting to DNA to call it a collection of computer algorithms. DNA is far, far more sophisticated than any computer algorithm could ever be.

These algorithms are so sophisticated that a human would look at them and claim: there is no way that these algorithms can work!! But they do work!!

Let us see how the "morphing of the embryo" algorithms on DNA work. This article traces the "morphing of the embryo" until there are 16 cells in the fetus. In this article you will learn why no team of computer programmers on earth could even begin to replicate the way that DNA works!!!
Article: When There Are 16 Cells During the Morphing of the Embryo!!

YouTube Video: "From Conception to Birth"

Human DNA and the DNA of thousands of other species are literally the most sophisticated computer programs on this planet. No computer program written by a human being can even be compared to the sophistication of human DNA or even the DNA of a mouse.

This 9 1/2 minute video graphically shows what I have been talking about!! It shows snapshots of the "morphing of the embryo" as a real human baby morphs from conception to birth:
YouTube Video: "From Conception to Birth"

Natural Selection

Evolutionists claim that "natural selection" will save the theory of evolution!! Natural selection is considered the "engine that drives evolution." It is the hero of Darwinism.

However, natural selection has nothing to do with creating anything. No new species of plant or animal was ever CREATED by natural selection!!

Natural selection can only DESTROY plants and animals AFTER they are created!!

Plants and animals can only be created by unbelievably complex DNA, not by lions eating gazelles (i.e. natural selection).

In other words, each species MUST BE CREATED by a sequence of DNA inside of a cell before it can be destroyed by natural selection!!

The evolution debate is not about how plants and animals are destroyed; the debate is about where the DNA of plants and animals came from.

Natural selection has nothing to do with creating a new species, meaning it has nothing to do with evolution!! Natural selection cannot help the theory of evolution one iota!!

Let us go back to the time when there were only 1,000 species of animals on this planet. Now let us suppose that one of the species ate all of the members of one of the other species. The "other species" is now extinct.

How does that event tell us where the 1,000 species came from?? It doesn't, it only tells us where one species went - it went into extinction.

Natural selection only tells us which species are made extinct and perhaps how they became extinct.

But "natural section" does not tell us HOW ANY species came to exist!!

When Darwin was on the Galapagos Islands, he saw a lot of unknown species. But nothing he saw told him where these species came from.

Nothing Darwin (or any other naturalist before or after him) ever saw told him anything about what is necessary for a species to exist. It was not until 1953 that scientists even began to understand how an animal or plant is created.

The key question that evolution must answer is this: where do new species come from? With the discovery of DNA, the burden is on the evolutionists to: prove that new DNA (for a new species) can be created from scratch or new DNA can be created by modifications to the DNA of a previously existing species by a series of random, undirected accidents to the DNA of the existing species!!

Natural selection says that the best species will survive. While this may be true, natural selection has nothing to do with creating a new species!! "Natural selection" is only about death, not life.

And if an "old species" (which will probably continue to exist) has both a male and female, evolves into a "new species," the new species must also have a male and female and their offspring must have new and improved "morphing of the embryo algorithms" for both the baby male and baby female.

The evolutionists have not proven one iota of the things they need to prove to support the theory of evolution.

What they have proven is their ability to deceive people by inventing imaginary stories to support their beliefs.

As is shown on this website, the deceptions and lies of the atheists are so sophisticated and so clever, there is no shame in a person believing in the theory of evolution. Every student is bombarded with massive numbers of sophisticated deceptions.

And I am equally sure that many professors and teachers have also been deceived by the clever deceptions of the major evolutionists. In fact, they were likely trained to believe in evolution.

The Universe

The atheists claim that the Universe came to exist by a gigantic explosion. That may or may not be so, but the key question is whether this explosion was the result of accidents or God.

If an accident, where did the massive amount of energy needed for the Big Bang come from, assuming it ever happened? And why was this energy clustered in one location? And what was it that "exploded" and where did that object come from? The accidental "Big Bang" theory is nonsense and is in total violation of the First Law of Thermodynamics which states that energy can neither be created nor destroyed.

Only in the fantasyland of the theory of evolution could a single object (or no object at all) accidentally explode to create millions and millions of galaxies and then billions of years later accidentally create the earth and human DNA, the most sophisticated object on earth.

But God does not need to use deceptions and lies to get followers. Just look at the night sky!! The stars and galaxies and galaxy clusters and superclusters were not created by accident (i.e. the Big Bang), as atheists want you to believe, they were created by God.

Yet every time there is a new discovery about the sophistication of DNA, human cells, anatomy, astronomy, etc. the evolutionists, most of whom are atheists, come up with some new spin so they can claim that what was discovered came to exist by accident so they can assign the discovery to the theory of evolution!!

In fact, it doesn't matter how absurd the theory of evolution is because the theory of evolution is such a good recruiting tool for atheism. Because arrogant atheists dominate the scientific establishment, the theory of evolution is not going away any time soon!!

In fact, if you want to get published in a leading biology journal you better be an atheist and your article better support the theory of evolution. If it does not praise evolution your article will end up in the trash can, not in a "science" journal.

Some scientists defend the theory of evolution by noting the massive number of pro-evolution articles published in "leading" scientific journals.

Such a defense of evolution is far beyond inane. The "scientific" journals refuse to publish anything that does not support the theory of evolution. Atheists totally dominate most universities and all major journals.

The "Hidden Agenda" of Evolutionists

So why do evolutionists, even after the discovery of DNA, claim that a series of accidents (i.e. evolution) created the DNA of the father and mother??

The reason is that many of the leading evolutionists have a hidden agenda.

Author and attorney Phillip E. Johnson explains the hidden agenda of the evolutionists:

  • "Science [i.e. the scientific establishment] is committed to philosophical naturalism [i.e. atheism] and therefore science must assume that no Creator, and no purposeful intelligence, is behind our existence ... All that science can address is the question of: 'granted that we are here as a result of purposeless material mechanisms, what's the most plausible purposeless material mechanism that we can imagine?'"
    Phillip E. Johnson, professor, author, attorney; quoted on UCTV

Read that quote two or three times, it is an amazing statement.

In other words, many in the scientific establishment are atheists, thus they do not believe that God exists, so they set as their goal to get converts to atheism. To do this they find: the "most plausible" scientific theory they can invent to get converts to atheism!"

Of course, the "most plausible" scientific theory they can invent is the "theory of evolution."

With the goal in mind to get converts to atheism, the leading atheists use their talents of "spin" and deception to try to get converts to atheism.

So why are these evolutionists so bent on defending a scientifically absurd theory?? Because they are far too proud to admit that a God could exist who is smarter than they are. The modern theory of evolution exists because of pride, not science. The atheists want people to worship them, not God.

But the theory of evolution is simply not scientifically viable.

Simplicity Never Creates Complexity!!

Let us look at an example of complexity, the human eyes. The human eyes, like all other parts of the human body, are created from the algorithms on the DNA of the fertilized egg. The sections on human DNA which create the human eyes must be far more complex than the eyes themselves!! And the intelligence who designed the DNA (God) must be far more complex than the DNA itself!!

In other words, simplicity never creates complexity. To understand these concepts, consider these items:

First, consider that a human-designed computer program exists because of the human intelligence to write the computer program, the human intelligence to write the computer language, the human intelligence to write the computer language compiler, the human intelligence to design and build the microprocessor, including designing and building the memory chips, etc.

Second, consider the output of the computer program which is printed on a piece of paper.

How can the printout on the piece of paper be more sophisticated than the human intelligence needed to write the computer language, needed to write the computer programs, etc.?? It can't!!

Let's think about the memory chips. I have a son who works for a company that makes memory chips. At times he is sitting in a very large room by himself, with several billion dollars worth of equipment needed to make memory chips!!

The memory chips cannot be more complex than the machines that made them, and the machines that made them cannot be more complex than the humans who designed them!!

Simplicity cannot create complexity!!

Consider the sophistication of DNA such that it creates a person's brain. Let us think about a pianist.

A pianist must be able to convert thousands on dots on a sheet of music into the movements of their fingers!! To do this the DNA must create the nerves between their eyes and their brain, have the brain process these dots and then the brain controls their fingers. And the DNA must create the muscles on their fingers, etc.

If all of this is in place, and with thousands of hours of practice, a pianist can play the Rachmaninoff Piano Concerto #3!!

What created our DNA, which in turn created our brain, had to be far, far smarter than our DNA and our brain!!!

That would be God.

Accidents (i.e. evolution) have zero intelligence so how could a series of accidents create something with intelligence? They can't!! Intelligence is a top-down process and someone a lot smarter than humans had to design the DNA of every one of the thousand-plus species on this planet.

Article: Why Do We Need Computer Programmers??

All animals, not just humans, are created from a single, fertilized egg. The fertilized egg contains the DNA that has the instructions to "morph" the single fertilized egg into a baby animal. This DNA may be inside of a mother or an egg.

The theory of evolution must claim that the DNA of all animals was created purely by accident since the theory of evolution denies any Supreme Being or any other intelligence in Nature.

Thus, the only way that evolution can create a new species, including humans, is to:

1) Randomly create a new DNA strand for a new species
2) Randomly mutate the DNA of an existing species into a new and improved DNA strand for an improved species.

These are the only two ways that evolution can create a new species of animal. So the validity of the theory of evolution has nothing to do with the phylogenetic tree and it has everything to do with statistics applied to DNA.

But as we just saw in the "When There are 16 Cells" article, DNA is incomprehensible in sophistication. If randomness can always improve the incredible computer programs on DNA to create a new and improved species, as evolution claims, then certainly random changes in the far, far less sophisticated world of human-designed computer programs should also work every time.

For example, where are the failures of evolution? What I mean is this: where are the remains of animals with defective DNA (i.e. mutants) whose DNA was not sufficiently good for the "new species" to survive!!

Quite frankly, there are none.

But statistics would tell us that for each new species, there would be trillions of failures to create this new species. The failures would create mutant animals that cannot survive!!

Mutations are almost always detrimental to the species.

In other words, if you took any DNA and randomly mutated it; the chance that a new and improved species would result would be far less than 1 in a trillion trillion trillion attempts (i.e. far less than 1 divided by one nonillion)!!

Thus, for each new species on this planet there should be more than 1 nonillion dead animals which could not survive due to defective DNA. Even if the DNA of a perfectly good animal was mutated, the offspring would almost certainly be dead at birth.

So if there have been many thousands of new animal species, there should be decillions of mutated animal bodies scattered around the earth. Actually, I am being very generous to the theory of evolution.

Where are the decillions of dead animals with defective DNA? They are not to be found because the theory of evolution is nonsense and has never created a single new and improved species!!

If there were not decillions of mutated animal bodies then the atheists must claim that all forms of randomness will always be beneficial, even in the world of computers.

Thus, atheists must claim that computer programmers are not necessary and that random number generators would easily be able to create all new and improved computer programs.

This article dives into this issue in detail:
Article: Why Do We Need Computer Programmers?

The First Child Paradox

Let us consider the first child to be BORN on this planet. Let us assume it was a male for the sake of argument.

We will call the "first child" born on this planet: Herman, meaning the first child was a male. The same result would be achieved if the first baby was assumed to be a female.

Herman had to have "parents," a mother and a father, if he was born on this planet (whether evolution is true or not).

1) If Herman was the first human born on this planet his mother had to exist before he was conceived,
2) But Herman's father also had to already exist,
3) The "morphing of the embryo" algorithms on the DNA of the father and the DNA of the mother had to line up enough so that Herman could have viable DNA for himself.

With these conditions, Herman could be the first child born on this planet.

In other words, Herman had to have parents to be born on this planet. Here is the paradox: where did Herman's parents come from?? Herman's parents could not have been born on this planet because we assumed that Herman was the first child born on this planet.

But this leads to a contradiction that any human could have been the first child born on this planet. His parents had to be born before he was born if evolution were true. but this is a contradiction that Herman was the first child born on this planet!!! We must reject the theory of evolution which must claim that there was a "first [human] child" born on this earth.

The only way that a "first child" could have been born on this earth is if Adam and Eve were created by God!! And that is exactly what happened. The data fits the scriptures perfectly but does not fit the theory of evolution.

Did Humans Descend From Monkeys or Any Other Primate?

Of course evolutionists would try to explain this paradox by saying that humans descended from monkeys or some other primate and all evolution had to do was modify the DNA of the monkeys or other primate to create humans.

In other words, evolution must claim that Herman's parents were monkeys or some other primate. And they would claim that the first female human was also born from primates (so Herman could have a wife and human children).

But this is also impossible.

Could you take a massive computer program, capable of controlling the traffic for millions of cars in a highly populated city and then randomly mutate the object code of this computer program and end up with a computer program which can also handle airplane traffic? No programmer would even attempt such a nonsensical idea in spite of the high speed of computers.

Likewise you cannot take complex DNA (for a primate other than a human) and randomly mutate it and end up with children who have human DNA.

And I have only talked about human DNA. Similar issues exist for the "firstborn" of many, many other species which have both a male and female!!

What The Book of Mormon Says About Evolution!!

The Book of Mormon covers a period of time between 600 B.C. and 421 A.D., mostly in America. But parts of the Book of Mormon were actually written long before 600 B.C. The book was written by prophets, just like the Bible was written by prophets.

The Book of Mormon was originally written on gold plates and when the people were so wicked that the last prophet knew they would be totally destroyed the gold plates were hidden in 421 A.D. They were eventually given to a prophet named Joseph Smith, who translated them by the gift and power of God. The Book of Mormon was first published in 1830 in New York.

The Book of Mormon actually described the Theory of Evolution when it was published in 1830, which was 29 years before Darwin wrote his first book (though many other books about naturalism had been printed prior to Darwin's first book).

One chapter in the Book of Mormon describes natural selection and claims Adam and Eve never existed, etc. But it was not a prophet who taught these doctrines in Alma chapter 30, it was an "anti-Christ," named Korihor.

In Alma 30 in the Book of Mormon, Korihor has three unique characteristics:
1) Korihor was taught his doctrines (i.e. the theory of evolution) by a personal appearance of the devil,
2) Korihor was taught doctrines by satan which were exactly the opposite, item by item, of the teachings of the prophets, and
3) Korihor was commanded to be struck dumb by a prophet of God, Alma the Younger.

In 1830, the Book of Mormon was very critical of the theory of evolution!!

As far as I know the Book of Mormon was the first book on this planet to be very critical of the theory of evolution. And it was very critical of the theory of evolution 29 years BEFORE the theory of evolution even existed in its current form!!!

Scores of other books on naturalism had been published before and after the Book of Mormon, but they were always pro-naturalism (though I suspect that Darwin was the first person to use the term: "evolution" and claim that one species came from another species).

Today the doctrines of the theory of evolution are a mirror-image of the doctrines of the prophets. In other words, the doctrines of the theory of evolution are not just modifications of Mormon doctrine, they are a mirror image of church doctrines!!

In fact, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (i.e. LDS church or Mormon church) has always, from 1830 to the present day, been strongly against the theory of evolution, even before Darwin wrote his first book in 1859 and long before the discovery of DNA in 1953.

As just one example, the First Presidency, in 1909, published a statement very, very critical of the theory of evolution (and this was long before the discovery of DNA in 1953). Here is only one paragraph from their statement:

  • "... God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him, male and female created he them." In these plain and pointed words the inspired author of the book of Genesis made known to the world the truth concerning the origin of the human family ... [Moses] was speaking as the mouthpiece of God, and his solemn declaration was for all time and for all people."

The LDS church reprinted the entire 1909 proclamation in the February, 2002 Ensign. Since 1830, there have been numerous articles and talks by church authorities which are critical of the theory of evolution. Two current apostles are included in this group.

Article: Why The Confusion About Evolution?

So how do the leading atheists and evolutionists get people to believe that the most complex computer programs on earth (i.e. DNA), and the incredible sophistication of cells, came to exist by a series of accidents?

Because the leading atheists and evolutionists have zero evidence for true evolution, they have come up with some clever tactics which depend on deceptive definitions. In fact, the MAIN EVIDENCE for the theory of evolution is obtained by using deceptive definitions. This is necessary because there is no valid scientific evidence for evolution in nature!!

By using clever and deceptive definitions they can pretend to have "evidence" for evolution. It takes a complete article to unravel these clever and highly deceptive definitions:
Article: Why The Confusion About Evolution?

Article: What Did Darwin Know?

Charles Darwin knew nothing about cells and he knew nothing about the DNA inside of those cells. In fact, based on what scientists knew in Darwin's day, the data that Darwin developed fully supported his theory of evolution!! It was not until 1953, with the discovery of DNA, that Darwin's theories could be disproven!! This article is actually in defense of Darwin based on what scientists knew in his day!!
Article: What Did Darwin Know?

What is Life?

Let us look at the issue: "what is life?" For example, if you took a fish and left it out of the water until it died, and then put it back into the water, why doesn't it come back to life? All of the raw elements for life are still in the fish, so why doesn't it come back to life? There is something more to "life" than just cells and oxygen and water.

Furthermore, have the evolutionists and atheists ever proven that life can be created from non-life (i.e. inorganic materials)?? Never, never, never - yet they continue to preach atheism.

While several attempts have been made to create life from non-life (e.g. Miller-Uray, Wong and Hartgerink), the scientists have not only failed to create life, they have also failed to prove it can be done. They cannot create a DNA strand from inorganic material, much less a DNA strand with a viable permutation of nucleotides for life which is inside of a cell!!

For example, have scientists put a large shell over a pond, which had no life, meaning there was no DNA and no cells (this simulates "prebiotic," meaning "existing before life"), and observed "life" form by a series of accidents, including RNA or DNA inside of a "first living cell" (in that pond), that was alive and had the ability to divide itself into two cells (which would be required for life to continue)?


Then what is their evidence for evolution? Their only evidence is that many scientists do not believe in God and thus they have no choice except to use their God-given brains to deceive people into believing that everything in the Universe, including human DNA, occurred by chance.

But the theory of evolution should have been thrown in the trash can when DNA was discovered and when the complexity of cells was also discovered. Yet, as scientists learn more and more about DNA and cells, the atheists continue to cling to the theory of evolution as if it were still 1859, when Darwin's first book was published.

The only thing that is "evolving" on this planet is the theory of evolution as evolutionists/atheists constantly need to develop new spin to account for the new discoveries about the sophistication of cells, the morphing of the embryo algorithms on DNA, etc.


What is the difference between "creating" a brand new Buick versus "destroying" a brand new Buick by driving it over a cliff??

The difference is that the new Buick being driven off the cliff must have been created before it was driven over a cliff.

How does driving a Buick over a cliff help explain how the Buick got created in the first place?? It doesn't.

So how does finding the remains of an extinct animal (i.e. its fossil) tell us how it was created?? It doesn't. All it tells us is that this animal used to be alive, but now it is dead.

An animal must be alive before it is dead. A fossil does not tell us how an animal was created, it only tells us that the animal is dead.

But even extinct animals had to have DNA and their DNA had to create them either from an egg (e.g. a chicken egg) or a fertilized egg (e.g. humans or monkeys).

Every animal on this planet, including humans, came from a single DNA strand which was inside of an egg. Whether they came from an egg (i.e. a chicken egg) or a single fertilized egg in a mother, the animal (including humans) came from a single object and then morphed over time into what it was when it was young and eventually died.

So the evolution debate is not about where bones came from, it is about where DNA came from. How did so many thousands of "morphing of the embryo" algorithms come to exist for thousands of complex species?

The evolution debate is therefore about statistics. There are so many past and present highly sophisticated DNA strands for both extinct and living animals that the theory of evolution has become ludicrous.

So the evolution debate is not just about the creation of DNA, it is also about viable permutations of nucleotides on DNA.

It is far beyond the scope of this home page to talk about many subjects. But trust me: the probability of a viable permutation of nucleotides, to create both a male and female for a single advanced species (the permutation of nucleotides on the DNA would have to be almost perfect in order to perform the morphing of the embryo for both a male and female offspring), etc. is so ludicrous it could not happen a single time in the estimated age of this Universe.

In summary, with:
1) The discovery of DNA in 1953,
2) The ongoing discoveries about the sophistication of DNA,
3) The incomprehensible sophistication of the morphing of the embryo algorithms on DNA,
4) The ongoing discoveries about the sophistication of what goes on inside of cells,
5) The sophistication of the human body (which is made by using the DNA algorithms),
6) The rarity of viable permutations of nucleotides (advanced topic),
7) etc.
the theory of evolution has been totally obliterated.

But of course the atheists, like Richard Dawkins, do everything in their power to keep the theory of evolution alive.

By the way, several world-famous atheists/evolutionists have converted over to creation science, meaning they now believe in a God who created all things. More about them in a moment.

Genes and Evolution

Here is another problem evolutionists have in defending the theory of evolution. There are about 20,000 genes on human DNA. Each must be "expressed" (i.e. turned on) or "not expressed" (i.e. turned off). The information to turn a gene on or off, for each cell, must come from within that cell.

But every cell has the same DNA!! So why do different cells have different combinations of genes turned on or off??

Multiply 20,000 genes (which are expressed differently in different types of cells), by 30 billion cells in a newborn baby and the resulting number is far larger than the 3.2 billion nucleotides on DNA. The number is 600 trillion genes!!

This means that for each nucleotide on the DNA strand (and every cell has the same DNA strand), there are 187,500 genes (600 trillion genes divided by 3.2 billion nucleotides) which need to be expressed or not expressed!!

In other words, 600 trillion genes, in the cells of the newborn baby, need to know whether to be activated/expressed or not. But there are only 3.2 billion nucleotides on the DNA in each cell to tell them whether to be expressed or not expressed and each cell has exactly the same DNA!!

How does the DNA in each cell know which genes to activate for that cell as the baby is growing and the cells are dividing??

Remember, a human being starts out as one cell (the fertilized egg) which has a single DNA strand with 3.2 billion nucleotides on it and then this cell starts dividing. Every cell in a human being has exactly the same DNA.

No new information can be added during the morphing of the embryo process because nothing from outside the new baby is integrated into the baby other than milk and food.

So how can each nucleotide on DNA, which has one of four states (A, C, G or T) control the expression of 187,500 genes?? It can't!! And remember, the DNA also needs the information to control the morphing of the embryo!!

There is simply not enough information on DNA to control all of the activities that are going on as the baby is being created!!

And even if there was enough information via compression algorithms, the algorithms on DNA would have to be so sophisticated and incomprehensible that they could not have come to exist by a series of accidents!!

Why don't most biology textbooks talk about these and many other problems with the theory of evolution? Because they want to pretend the theory of evolution is true!!

The Complexity of Cells

There is human DNA inside of every cell (except some red blood cells), but human DNA is not the only highly sophisticated object inside the cells. There are many other complex objects, some of which were created by the genes on the DNA.

I own a book on Cell Biology called Essential Cell Biology, Third Edition, by Alberts, Bray, Hopkin, Johnson, Lewis, Raff, Roberts and Walter. It is a large book with 731 pages!! A section header on page 410 reads: Transmitter-gated Channels in Target Cells Convert Chemical Signals Into Electrical Signals." This is not something you read in the comic section of the newspaper.

I also own a book called The World of the Cell by Becker, Kleinsmith and Hardin. This is a large book with 845 pages in the Fourth Edition. For example, on page 763 there is a section header with the title: Microtubules Are Regulated by Microtubule-Associated Proteins (MAPs).

I also own a book called The Dictionary of Cell and Molecular Biology by J.M. Lackie. It is 725 pages and the print is small.

Not all of the terms in these three books are related to human cell biology, but many of them are. How could anyone read these books and think that the cells in any species, including human beings, "evolved" from a series of accidents which started in a "warm pond" millions of years ago!!

Another major evidence for a creation is human anatomy. You may think that human anatomy is simple. It is not. Dr. David Menton has an 8 DVD set (called: "Body of Evidence") which details the amazing complexity and sophistication of the human body. He talks about why bones are hollow, why we have ligaments, fibrocartilage, tendons, the sophistication of the human eye, and so on.

And remember, the complexity of the DNA which creates human anatomy must be far, far more sophisticated than the human anatomy itself!!

Many creation scientists focus on the complexity of human anatomy and don't even bother to talk about the sophistication of the DNA which creates this human anatomy.

So why would anyone believe the theory of evolution after the ongoing discoveries about the sophistication of DNA and the complexity of cells and the sophistication of human anatomy?

The reason is that the leading evolutionists are atheists and they write most of the textbooks. The textbooks never talk about the severe problems with the theory of evolution and instead the books contain a wide-range of clever deceptions!!

"Evolution" is nothing but the clever deceptions of leading atheists who claim that there is no God and that the entire Universe, and the DNA of all species, came to exist by nothing but a series of accidents!! How can someone even claim that a "series of accidents" (i.e. evolution) created the Universe and the most sophisticated object on earth - human DNA - plus the unique DNA of thousands of other species?

Even a bacteria is more complex than a Buick. For example, some types of bacteria can divide into two bacteria in less than twenty minutes. But a Buick can never divide into two Buicks.

So why would anyone believe that a Buick was created by human intelligence, but the far, far more sophisticated cells in a human being, including the "morphing of the embryo algorithms" on the DNA of a human being, were made by a long sequence of pure accidents??

As more and more is understood about:
1) The incomprehensible morphing of the embryo algorithms on DNA, which no human can comprehend,
2) The complexity of cells and what goes on inside of cells,
3) The incredible mechanisms which cause a single cell to divide into two cells,
4) The sophistication of the genes on DNA and their ability to create critical proteins for the cells,
5) How the elements in the cell (when a new enzyme is needed) can find where on the DNA the necessary gene is located,
6) The mechanisms to convert the patterns on the genes (called proteins) into enzymes the cell can use,
7) The creation of the organelles in the new cell as a cell divides into two cells (i.e. "organelle biogenesis"), which scientists still do not understand,
8) The obvious lack of enough information on DNA to control the activation and deactivation of genes,
9) How male DNA and female DNA interact to create a baby with features of both the father and mother,
10) How multiple children, of the same parents, and of the same sex, can look different than each other,
11) Human anatomy, which is designed and created by the DNA,
12) Human intelligence and our ability to reason, think and remember,
etc., the theory of evolution has become total and complete nonsense!!

In addition, DNA is self-correcting. There are enzymes that constantly go up and down the DNA in the cell, looking for mistakes and these enzymes fix these mistakes as they find them, if they can!!

Let me emphasize one of the above issues. When a cell needs an enzyme it goes to the DNA to find the pattern (i.e. the gene) on the DNA to make that enzyme. How does the cell know where the pattern is on the DNA? And how does the cell know how long the gene is to create the enzyme?

I should also mention that some animals are so unique, and have features that only apply to them, that finding an "ancestor" of these species is impossible. In other words, they could not have been created by evolution from a prior species because no other species exists which is anything like them!!

Randomness never creates anything that is highly sophisticated and functional so how could the world's two most sophisticated and functional objects (male and female human DNA) have been created by randomness??!!

But no matter how much evidence is brought against the theory of evolution, most atheists will never admit they are wrong. And many others are deceived by the clever deceptions of the hard-core atheists, who are proud to admit they are atheists. Nevertheless, more than a half-dozen well-known atheists have switched over to becoming creation scientists (e.g. the late Andrew Flew, Alister McGrath and Francis S. Collins).

Could a Simple Cell Exist?

Evolutionists understand the problems with creating a human cell from scratch, so they claim that the "first living cell" was a simple cell and that numerous increasingly complex types of cells "evolved" between the "first living cell" and human cells.

First of all, there are no "simple cells." Even the simplest cell on this earth has DNA (except for some red blood cells, however, there is no way these red blood cells can divide!!) and inside each cell is also an incredible, miniature factory.

"Simple cells" cannot have been created by evolution because all cells must:
1) Have an enclosed cell membrane (a.k.a. plasma membrane) so fluid cannot leak out,
2) Yet this same cell membrane must be able to allow food to get in (in some cases "food" can be sunlight or chemicals),
3) And cells must be able to excrete waste products through the cell membrane (human cells have at least six different methods of doing this),
4) All cells must have DNA patterns (i.e. called "enzymes") to create enzymes. While even a single-cell organism must have enzymes on the DNA, it would not need "morphing of the embryo" algorithms,
5) All cells must have mechanisms to convert the DNA patterns (i.e. enzymes) into enzymes the cell can use, meaning the cell must be able to find where the needed enzymes are located,
6) All cells must be able to reproduce, meaning divide into two cells so the species can continue to survive,
7) All cells must be able to create energy (e.g. ATP molecules)

All of these things, and many others, would have to happen at the same time in the same warm pond (or somewhere else), and it must happen very quickly because all these things must happen inside the one-and-only "first living cell"!! What nonsense!!

Furthermore, evolutionists claim that life on this earth started with a single cell and gradually over time more and more complex species "evolved" until human DNA existed. This means that multiple cells must eventually be able to work together to accomplish major tasks, such as "seeing" for advanced species.

As cells got more complex, and as multiple cells started making more complex species, the DNA would constantly need to get longer and more complex. There would have to be hundreds of "intermediate species" before human DNA could exist.

However, it would be massively more difficult to create human DNA by a sequence of intermediate species than to create it from scratch!! Creating each intermediate species makes evolution even more absurd because each intermediate species would have to have its own unique, sophisticated DNA!!!

For example, could you take a simple computer program (the binary code) that adds two numbers together and randomly add, delete and modify the "bits" of the binary code so that the program also does multiplication and division? Never!!

And then could you randomly modify the new program again so that it did square roots? Never!!

Likewise, you cannot randomly add, delete and change nucleotides on the DNA of a chimpanzee and end up with human DNA. The structure of the DNA of a chimpanzee is massively different than the structure of the DNA of a human (especially the morphing of the embryo algorithms which are incomprehensible computer programs). So how could humans be descended from chimpanzees or any other primate species??

Let us consider six of the things that must happen for humans to have "evolved" from chimpanzees (or any other primate):

1) The DNA of a male chimpanzee sperm must be damaged and randomly mutate into the DNA of a human male (the mutations must include new morphing of the embryo algorithms for a human male). Thus one computer program (male chimpanzee DNA) must randomly mutate into a massively more sophisticated computer program (e.g. DNA for a massively more intelligent human brain),

2) The DNA of a female chimpanzee egg must be damaged and randomly mutate into the DNA of a human female (the mutations must include new "morphing of the embryo" algorithms for a human female). This one computer program (female chimpanzee DNA) must randomly mutate into a massively more sophisticated computer program (e.g. DNA for a massively more intelligent human brain),

3) This specific male and female chimpanzee must live in the same time period, and the same general location, and they must find each other and mate,

4) The correct sperm of the male chimpanzee (the sperm that contained the mutated DNA) must be the sperm that "finds" the egg of the female chimpanzee,

5) The first human male and female must be reared by their respective mother chimpanzees (e.g. they cannot be rejected by their mothers),

6) The first human male and first human female must grow up and then mate and have multiple offspring to start the new species.

It may sound easy on paper, but primate DNA is anything but simple. No computer program on this earth is as sophisticated as chimpanzee DNA or the DNA of many other species.

Evolution After The "First Living Cell"

Evolutionists claim that the DNA of the first human male and the DNA of the first human female "evolved" independently over millions of years, from the same "first living cell," by a series of accidents called "evolution"!!!

How did the DNA of the first human father and the DNA of the first human mother "evolve" together from the "first living cell?" How was their DNA synchronized, species after slightly improved species, as the DNA of the males and females evolved independently for millions of years?? We just looked at only one example above.

As another example, suppose the male DNA evolved slightly faster than the female DNA evolved. Within thousands of years their DNA would not align and they would not have been able to have any children that survived because their DNA was not compatible!!

Male DNA and female DNA had to be designed by the same person at the same time - God. Evolution could never have designed two massively sophisticated computer programs (DNA) that could be integrated together to create a third computer program (a baby).

Yet the atheists claim that evolution created male and female DNA for many species that have both a male and female. They must claim the male and female DNA "evolved" over the same time period (so they could mate as they slowly evolved over many generations) and they had to live in the same geographical area (also required so they could mate).

But the truth is that it does not matter what is discovered in cell biology, DNA analysis, etc. because no matter what is discovered, the theory of evolution will be given credit for it by the atheists!!

The evolution debate is not about science, it is about God. If you assume God does not exist, or if you believe God does not exist, you will likely believe in the theory of evolution no matter how absurd it is.

The theory of evolution is the story-telling of the atheists to get converts and stroke their pride.

Many people who believe in God have been tricked into believing in evolution. In fact, that is the precise purpose of the theory of evolution and why it is taught in most schools, but not all schools. In some schools, "creation science" or "intelligent design" is taught and in other schools there are disclaimers about evolution.

Biology is no longer about science, it is about creative thinking as to how every discovery can be attributed to the theory of evolution in order to get more converts to atheism.

But as the two free eBooks and articles on this website demonstrate, the theory of evolution is nothing but the clever deceptions of the atheists.

The Complexity of Cells and YouTube Videos

When the theory of evolution was proposed by Darwin, scientists knew virtually nothing about cells and certainly nothing about DNA (there is DNA inside of every cell except for some red blood cells which circulate in the blood).

But cells are now known to be very complex and they could not have formed by accident any more than a Buick could have formed by an explosion in a forest. As one person put it:

  • "The interior of an animal cell is like a small city, with factories -- called organelles -- dedicated to manufacturing, energy production, waste processing, and other life functions. A network of intercellular "highways," called microtubules, enables bio-molecular complexes, products, and other cargo to move speedily about the cell to keep this vital machinery humming."

A YouTube video is an excellent source to get a small feel for how complex a human cell is. This YouTube video is called: "A Tour of the Cell." It is an excellent introduction to what is going on inside of cells, particularly with regards to the organelles. It was created by Bozeman Science:
YouTube Video on the Organelles in the Cells

The next video is an animation of what is going on inside the cells. This video is mainly about how a cell deals with inflammation.

As you watch this video note the terminology and keep asking yourself this question: "How could something this complex have formed by accident in a warm pond?" The video is called the "Inner Life of a Cell" and it lasts about 8 minutes:
YouTube Video on the Complexity of Cells

Did you understand all of those terms?

Many of the terms used in that video are a protein, are made of proteins or are associated with proteins. Proteins are made by the DNA inside the cell. The DNA provides the "patterns" needed to make the proteins via a chain reaction of chemical processes. The patterns are called "genes." They are the patterns to make the proteins inside the cell. The cell literally could not function without the genes on the DNA!!

Here is another video on what is going on inside of cells and is called: "Voyage Inside The Cell," but it has more of a focus on DNA and the process of cell division - it lasts about 15 minutes and is an incredible video:
YouTube Video on Cell Divisions

To think that any cell (e.g. the "first living cell") could be created by a series of accidents in a "warm pond" is complete nonsense. Scientists who believe this nonsense are stuck in 19th century biology.

In fact, cells could not exist without DNA to create critical proteins which are needed inside the cells and DNA needs cells for protection. Neither can exist without the other. So which came first, DNA (which needs the cell for protection) or the cell (which needs the genes on the DNA to provide the templates to make proteins for the cells)??

All real evidence points to a design and creation of all cells and DNA. In other words, all real evidence points to the claim that God designed both cells and DNA.

In fact, as scientific discoveries have developed relative to our understanding of cells and DNA, several well-known atheists who supported the theory of evolution have switched over to believing in God. But most atheists have instead developed new tools of deception to continue to get converts to atheism. These tools of deception generally revolve around deceptive definitions.

These deceptive definitions are so sophisticated, so deceptive and so clever that it takes seven chapters (chapters 10-16) in my free Patterns of Intelligence book, linked to below, to unravel them!!

Three of the key terms, which involve deceptive definitions, are: "species," "microevolution" and "macroevolution," which will discussed later.

Whenever you see any "evidence" for the theory of evolution, it is based on very bad science and/or highly deceptive definitions.

The Morphing of the Embryo Algorithms on DNA and YouTube Videos

The "morphing of the embryo" algorithms on DNA may occupy 97% of human DNA. They are essentially computer programs that control how a single fertilized egg becomes a new human baby with about 30 billion complex cells each of which must end up in just the right place at just the right time and have the correct genes activated!!

As you watch this video remember that a human being starts out as a single cell with a single DNA strand (the fertilized egg).

This incredible 9 1/2 minute video, which was mentioned above, graphically shows the "morphing of the embryo" of a human baby, which is controlled by DNA:
YouTube Video: "From Conception to Birth" (i.e. the "Morphing of the Embryo")

The video mentions that at 4 weeks, 1 million cells a second are being made and at birth a newborn baby has 60,000 miles of blood vessels. This process must be incomprehensible in complexity because if these blood vessels were not fully enclosed, as already mentioned, before blood started to circulate in the fetus, the fetus would bleed to death!!

How could evolution ever accidentally create that level of sophistication?? If a new species was not able to enclose the blood vessels before the blood started to circulate, every baby of that species would die and the species would immediately die off.

The one DNA strand inside the fertilized egg leads to the creation of billions of cells which include: a complete circulatory system, a human brain, the liver, the heart, the stomach, the muscles, the fingers, etc. etc.

As if that weren't incredible enough, the instructions for the morphing of the embryo come from inside the cells, where the DNA is!! Cells divide from the inside-out. And remember each cell has exactly the same DNA, yet each of the 30 billion cells ends up in a unique location in the baby with a specific set of genes activated.

This website contains two free eBooks and several articles which have no hesitation in stating that new discoveries about DNA, cell biology, anatomy, astronomy and other scientific disciplines overwhelmingly prove the theory of evolution cannot be true!!!

The War In Heaven Comes to Earth

The Bible, in Genesis 1, teaches that Adam, the first man on this Earth, was created by God after God had already created the earth, after God had created plants (to create oxygen) and after God created animal life (see Genesis 1:24-27).

Using modern terminology, we would say that God designed human DNA for both Adam and Eve and He also designed the DNA for all other species.

But all human beings existed as spirits before our spirits were put into a physical body. Our spirit included intelligence and was put into our "physical body" sometime between conception and birth.

In fact, long before we were born on this earth, our spirit bodies lived somewhere else in the "spirit world" or "pre-existent world" or "pre-existence." In the pre-existence we were sentient and even had to make very important decisions. But we did not have a physical body yet. We had to earn that right.

In the pre-existent world, the "spirit world," before we were placed on this earth, Michael (i.e. later called Adam) was the Savior's top General in the "war of words" that determined who would be born on this earth with a physical body. See this quote from the Bible:

  • 7 And there was war in heaven: Michael [i.e. Adam] and his angels fought against the dragon [i.e. satan who is frequently called Lucifer]; and the dragon fought and his angels,
    8 And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven.
    9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.
    Revelations 12:7-9

The phrase "cast out" means that Lucifer and his followers were sent to earth, never to receive a physical body.

But note that Michael (i.e. Adam) and Lucifer (i.e. satan) knew each other in the pre-existent world.

Because Adam (i.e. Michael) cast Lucifer out of heaven, it makes perfect sense that Lucifer would hate Adam and would invent a collection of doctrines to claim that Adam never existed!! These doctrines (i.e. that humans descended from a single cell in a warm pond instead of from Adam and Eve) are at the core of the theory of evolution today!!

Just like satan taught Korihor that there was no God, he also implied that Adam never existed (e.g. Alma 30:25).

Likewise, the theory of evolution today claims there is no God and it also claims that Adam and Eve never existed.

But in addition to the Bible: the Book of Mormon (e.g. 1 Nephi 5:11, 2 Nephi 2: 19-25, etc.), the Doctrine and Covenants (e.g. Section 27:5-14, etc.), and the Pearl of Great Price (e.g. Moses 1:32-35, Moses 3:7-25, etc.) all testify that Adam was the first man and was created by God.

Adam was also a great prophet, second only to Christ in Priesthood authority (e.g. Teachings of Joseph Smith [Chapter 8], see also Mormon Doctrine by Bruce R. McConkie, Bookcraft, 1966, p. 16 and see: "The Man Adam" by Robert L. Millet, Ensign, January, 1994).

While Michael is still the General of Christ's forces, Lucifer has become the father of all lies. It was Lucifer who taught Korihor that Christ would never be born and he taught him the theory of evolution.

The theory of evolution today cannot claim that Christ never existed because He is a well-known historical figure, but evolutionists today claim that Christ was not the Son of God because they claim there is no God.

In summary, the Bible and LDS doctrine make it very clear that Heavenly Father, Jesus Christ, the Holy Ghost, Adam and Eve, and Noah and Noah's wife are real beings!!

Yet, the theory of evolution today denies that all seven of these people ever existed (technically atheists today must admit that Christ existed, but they claim He was not divine as just mentioned)!!

As with Korihor's day, the theory of evolution today is a mirror image of the truth. The "war in heaven" is raging today!!

Of course, the doctrines of the theory of evolution are only the tip of the iceberg of the false doctrines that members of the church need to be prepared for. That is precisely why God has given His church a living prophet who has the same keys which were held by Peter, James and John. Today that prophet is Thomas S. Monson, who presides over the Mormon/LDS church.

Note: Noah is also called Gabriel and he is next in line to Adam in priesthood authority per the book: Teachings of Joseph Smith, Chapter 8

Where Did God Come From?

In order for God to design human DNA (humans cannot even comprehend DNA, must less design it) God must be massively smarter than any human being!! So it is perfectly fair to ask: Where did God come from?

The prophet Brigham Young, the second President of the LDS church and a contemporary of Darwin (they were born about 8 years apart), must have been asked about the origin of man with this type of question: "if Darwin was wrong, and if God created humans, then where did God come from?"

This was Brigham Young's answer:

  • "Many have tried to penetrate to the First Cause of all things [i.e. the origin of God]; but it would be as easy for an ant to number the grains of sand on the earth. It is not for man, with his limited intelligence, to grasp eternity in his comprehension ... It would be as easy for a gnat to trace the history of man back to his origin as for man to fathom the First Cause of all things, lift the veil of eternity, and reveal the mysteries that have been sought after by philosophers from the beginning."
    Brigham Young, second president of the LDS church (October 9, 1859)
    Journal of Discourses, Volume 7, Page 284

President Young was making it very clear that we mortals cannot even begin to comprehend eternity and the origin of God. Could an amoeba comprehend the religious doctrines in the Bible or design the blueprints for a new skyscraper?? Try to teach an amoeba high school algebra to the point it can pass a test!!

Just like an amoeba could not comprehend the religious doctrines in the Bible, or design a new skyscraper, we humans do not yet have the intelligence to comprehend the origin of God or even to comprehend how God thinks!! We will never have this intelligence while we are in mortality.

Brigham Young said this about God:

  • He is the Supreme Controller of the universe. At his rebuke the sea is dried up, and the rivers become a wilderness. He measures the waters in the hollow of his hand, and meteth out heaven with a span, and comprehendeth the dust of the earth in a measure, and weigheth the mountains in scales, and the hills in a balance; the nations to him are as a drop in a bucket, and he taketh up the isles as a very little thing; the hairs of our heads are numbered by him, and not a sparrow falleth to the ground without our Father; and he knoweth every thought and intent of the hearts of all living, for he is everywhere present by the power of his Spirit -- his minister, the Holy Ghost.

    He is the Father of all, is above all, through all, and in you all [see Ephesians 4:6]; he knoweth all things pertaining to this earth, and he knows all things pertaining to millions of earths like this.
    Brigham Young: 1998-1999 Priesthood/R.S. Manual - page 30
    Journal of Discourses, Volume 11, Page 41

Perhaps the day will come (long after we are resurrected) when we can comprehend the origin of God. The scriptures tell us very clearly that we are literally the children of God and that we are joint heirs with Christ (see: Romans 8:16-18).

Elder Russell M. Nelson said: "Who are we? We are children of God. Our potential is unlimited. Our inheritance is sacred."
"We Are Children of God," Ensign, October, 1998

But just because we cannot comprehend eternity now, because we are literally the Children of God, we have far greater potential that we can currently comprehend.

The day will come when all will be resurrected, both the just and the unjust. We cannot conceive, at this time, the things we will be able to comprehend a million years after we are resurrected.

God is a loving God, not a tyrant. He wants us to succeed!! It is important to understand that God has a bright future in store for those who will keep his commandments or if needed, will change their ways. President George Q. Cannon said this about those who may need to change their ways:

  • “No matter how serious the trial, how deep the distress, how great the affliction, [God] will never desert us. He never has, and He never will. He cannot do it. It is [against] His character [to do so]. He is an unchangeable being. … He will stand by us. We may pass through the fiery furnace; we may pass through deep waters; but we shall not be consumed nor overwhelmed. We shall emerge from all these trials and difficulties the better and the purer for them, if we only trust in our God and keep His commandments.”
    "Freedom of the Saints," in Collected Discourses, comp. by Brian H. Stuy, 5 vols. [1987-92], 2:185

And that is the difference between the theory of evolution and the true doctrine of God. Satan would have us believe that God does not exist (or that if He does exist He is a tyrant who wants us to fail) and that at death we cease to exist.

But God would have us understand that we are His children and that He loves us. He is quick to forgive and we can become more like Him as we progress throughout the eternities!!!

President John Taylor, the third President of the LDS church, said:

  • For we, as Latter-day Saints, do not consider that our existence ends with time, as we generally term it, but that it reaches into eternity. And that while we are here in a state of probation to fulfill the various duties [placed] upon us, as Saints of the living God; while we come into the world and exist in it for a time and then leave it, we have hopes and aspirations beyond the grave, and anticipate that, as ages and cycles shall pass along and generation succeeds generation, if we are true to our trust and live our religion, keeping the commandments of God and fulfilling the various covenants [we have accepted] ..., that we shall associate with the just in the eternities to come! Therefore we are living, and hoping, and expecting, and planning, and contriving and operating, for the accomplishment of this object. We do not look upon the affairs of this life as those alone in which humanity is interested.
    President John Taylor, January 2nd, 1881: "The Eternities Before the Saints"

It is impossible to find any two doctrines that are as opposite as the doctrines of evolution and the doctrines of the living prophets. The two sets of beliefs are antithetical (i.e. directly opposed or mutually incompatible).

The doctrines of God are pure light and inspiring. They motivate us to move forward in our progression to become more like Him. The doctrines of evolution are dark and depressing because they cast humans as nothing but animals which have no purpose and cease to exist at death.

False doctrines, such as the theory of evolution, are one reason why God provides the members of the LDS church with a living prophet and true scriptures!!

At the top of this home page I asked the question: "Prophets or Evolution?" The evidence is overwhelming that the prophets win!! We are not the children of a series of accidents, we are the children of God. He expects that we will live up to our glorious heritage. As we try to do this, and as President Cannon said: "God will never desert us."

Article: The First Book To Describe the Theory of Evolution Was NOT Written By Darwin

What was the first book on the planet earth to describe the theory of evolution, including the doctrine of natural selection, the claim that Adam and Eve never existed, the claim there is no God and no Christ, etc.

If you said the first book to describe evolution was Darwin's Origin of Species, published in 1859, you would be wrong.

Actually, as already mentioned, there were many books on naturalism, but Darwin's first book, and especially his second book, were designed to get converts to atheism.

This short article will explain in detail that The Book of Mormon, which was published in 1830 (29 years before Darwin's first book), explained the theory of evolution in detail:
Article: The First Book To Describe Evolution

Article: What Did Darwin Know?

In 1859, when Darwin published his first book, there was no reason not to believe the theory of evolution!! It was not for almost 100 years before the theory of evolution could be scientifically disproven.

This article demonstrates that everything that Darwin said was perfectly valid based on what he knew at the time.
Article: What Did Darwin Know?

Article: Prophetic Book of Mormon Warnings

This short article goes into more detail about prophets and evolution than what I just mentioned. However, if you plan on reading the Patterns of Intelligence book mentioned below, which is over 260 pages long, it is not necessary to read this article.
Article: Prophetic Book of Mormon Warnings (pdf file)

Spreadsheet: Alma 30: Doctrines of Korihor and Evolution

As a support to the above article, this spreadsheet shows the vast differences between what Korihor taught (i.e. what evolution teaches) and LDS doctrine. This spreadsheet goes verse by verse in Alma chapter 30 and explains the similarities between the teachings of Korihor and the doctrines of the theory of evolution. It also shows how each is the opposite of LDS doctrine:
Spreadsheet: Doctrines of Korihor and Evolution (Excel 2003 file)

Article: Why The Confusion About Evolution?

The intentional deceptions of evolutionists, by the use of clever terminology, are why there is such a wide diversity of opinions about evolution among LDS scientists. Very few members of the church understand the sophistication of the deceptions of the scientific establishment.

While these discussions are also in the Patterns of Intelligence book, to be discussed in a moment, if you want a quick lesson in understanding the deceptive definitions used by the scientific establishment, this article is for you.
Article: Why The Confusion About Evolution (pdf file)

Chapter Summary: Medium-size eBook (37 pages, pdf file): Patterns of Intelligence - Chapter Summary

If you want a quick, high level overview of the Patterns of Intelligence book, this article has a short summary of each chapter in the 266 page medium-size this book:
Chapter Summary: Patterns of Intelligence - Chapter Summary Only

Book: Medium-size eBook (266 pages, pdf file): Patterns of Intelligence

While the large book on this website is the "B-2 Bomber" of anti-evolution books, this book is the "F-22 Raptor" of anti-evolution books. This free book is actually much more current on the issues of the great scientific deceptions which are going on and the mathematical reasons evolution cannot be true. However, it does not go into the depth of the long book on the mathematical reasons evolution cannot be true.

Did you know that if you listed all major LDS doctrines and then took the opposite of each of these doctrines you would end up with the theory of evolution doctrines!! This book will produce such a detailed list in Chapter 2.

In this book you will see one of the main arguments of the large book, called "Patterns of Intelligence." This eBook has some really cool graphs.

But there are many things in the medium size book which are not in the large book. For example, chapters 22 and 23 of this book contain an amazing discussion which demonstrates that there is no where near enough information on DNA to control the "morphing of the embryo" algorithms!! Either God Himself designed DNA (and we cannot even remotely understand it) or the morphing of the embryo has help from the other side of the veil. There is no other option!!

Here is a link to the medium-sized book in one file. As always, you are welcome to read it online, download it, or print it out:
Free eBook: Patterns of Intelligence (pdf file)

Here is a link to the individual chapters in the medium-sized book. Each chapter is a file so it is easy to focus on one chapter at a time:
Book: Patterns of Intelligence (pdf file for each chapter)

Book (Free) - Prophets or Evolution - An LDS Perspective

This book is the "B-2 Bomber" of anti-evolution books. It demolishes the theory of evolution time after time and takes no enemies. The discovery of DNA has created an avalanche of ways to prove the theory of evolution is scientific nonsense.

This free eBook is available in both HTML and PDF formats and both versions can be looked at online or can be downloaded. For example, you can download the PDF version and print it out so you can mark it up. As always, you don't even need to tell me you downloaded it!!

The long eBook is called "Prophets or Evolution - An LDS Perspective," which:
1) Compares the doctrines of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (i.e. LDS church) to the theory of evolution (chapters 1-12),
2) Details many of the massive scientific problems with the theory of evolution (chapters 13-36).

The book in HTML format (by chapter):
Book (Free): Prophets or Evolution - An LDS Perspective (html version)

A printable version of the entire book (407 pages) is available in pdf format and can be read or downloaded from this link. It can also be printed out:
Free eBook: Prophets Or Evolution - An LDS Perspective (pdf file)

Chapter: "Seven Scientific Reasons ... Evolution Cannot be True"

The complete "Prophets or Evolution" book is over 400 pages. This is a link to one of the key chapters in the main eBook. This chapter is a high level overview of seven of the main scientific reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true. It also mentions seven other reasons evolution cannot be true. Here is a link to this chapter:
Chapter: Seven Scientific Reasons the Theory of Evolution Cannot be True

Article: The 1909 Official Statement of the First Presidency of the LDS Church

The 1909 statement of the First Presidency on the theory of evolution remains the official document of the church on the theory of evolution. This statement in 1909 was reprinted in the 2002 Ensign. It remains not only the official doctrine of the church, but the best description of the origin of man outside of the scriptures!! It is highly, highly recommended to the reader to study this document very carefully!!! It is unlike anything else you can read on the subject of evolution!!

Here is a link to this magnificent article:
Statement: "The Origin of Man" (Official 1909 First Presidency Statement)

Here is a 14 page article with my comments about the 1909 and 1910 statements of the First Presidency. My comments focus of the relationship between the statements of the First Presidency and what scientists knew between 1909 and 1953:
Article: Understanding the Context of the 1909 and 1910 Statements of the First Presidency

General Authority: He Hath Filled the Hungry!! (Elder Jeffrey L. Holland)

What kind of being is God?? To those who fear they may have sinned beyond the range of the atonement, there is a magnificent message in this general conference talk about the true nature of God!!
General Authority: He Hath Filled the Hungry with Good Things

Booklet: True To the Faith (First Presidency)

In addition to the 1909 article, an official booklet issued by the First Presidency in 2004: True to the Faith - A Gospel Reference, while not specifically about evolution, describes church doctrines which are the very antithesis of the doctrines of the theory of evolution (e.g. See topics: Atonement of Jesus Christ; Creation; Fall; God the Father; etc.). This booklet is available on www.lds.org:
Booklet: True to the Faith (Official 2004 First Presidency Booklet)

Article: The Prophetic Future of the LDS Church (President Spencer W. Kimball)

Do you want to know the future of the LDS church? A general conference talk by President Spencer W. Kimball provides a clear vision of what the future of the LDS church will be.
Article: The Prophetic Future of the LDS Church

Article: The False Gods We Worship (Article by President Spencer W. Kimball)

This classic article by President Spencer W. Kimball explains about the false gods some members of the church (and to some degree all of us) worship. Its lesson applies directly to the youth of the church!!
Article: The False Gods We Worship

Article: Beware of the Evil Behind the Smiling Eyes (Talk by Elder Neil L. Anderson)

Many attempts to lead the youth of the church astray are made by those who appear to be harmless or even friendly. This talk by Elder Neil L. Anderson, of the Quorum of the Twelve, is a warning to the youth of the church about those with "smiling eyes" who are not who they claim to be.
Article: Beware of the Evil Behind the Smiling Eyes

Quotes: The Power of God and the Future of the Church

These two articles contains quotes from the scriptures and from the living prophets and apostles about the power of God, the future of the LDS church and the final triumph of good over evil.
Quotes: The Power of God and the Future of the Church - Scriptures
Quotes: The Power of God and the Future of the Church - Prophets

Quotes: The Role and Importance of the LDS Church President

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints is led by a "living prophet." This article is designed to clarify the role and importance of the President of the LDS church. It is mostly quotes of several prominent church leaders about the role and importance of the LDS church President.
Quotes: The Role and Importance of the LDS Church President

Quotes: Church Membership

These are quotes about membership in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. The quotes come from the prophets and apostles.
Quotes: Church Membership

Website: Quotes of LDS Prophets and Apostles

This website has quotes from all of the Presidents of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and many of the Apostles of the church. There are many very powerful quotes on this website.
Website: Quotes of LDS Prophets and Apostles

Video: Creation and Evolution - A Witness of Prophets

This is an outstanding video dealing with the theory of evolution, and especially the quotes of living prophets regarding the theory of evolution.

The official position of the LDS church on the theory of evolution is made very clear in this video!! Many quotes of presidents of the church and modern apostles are presented.

This video is highly recommended for anyone who wonders how the church leaders feel about Darwin and his theory of evolution.

To Obtain a Copy, Visit:
Video: Creation and Evolution

Appendix: Other Anti-Evolution Books

If you listen to the propaganda of the pro-evolution monopoly you might think that anyone who believes in creation science is a dolt. Nothing could be further from the truth. There are many "creation scientists" (i.e. those who believe God created this Universe) who are brilliant and have no problems seeing through the false science generated by the scientific establishment.

In fact, many anti-evolution books have been written by brilliant scientists. This listing of anti-evolution books and DVDs contains only a small sampling of the anti-evolution books which exist in print. In fact, there are more than 200 anti-evolution books.

Many of the books were written by PhDs in the sciences. The arguments in these books totally shred the theory of evolution from a scientific standpoint.

Some of these books may be out of print and you may have to use a book finder, such as Alibris, to find them.

Here is a link to this appendix:
Appendix: Books and Movies Against the Theory of Evolution

Links: Links to Other LDS Websites on Evolution

This is a web page that links to other websites which discuss LDS doctrine versus the theory of evolution:
Links to Other Websites

Old Book: Old Version of "Patterns of Intelligence"

Here is an old version of the "Patterns of Intelligence" book:
Old Book: Patterns of Intelligence (Old HTML Version)

To Learn More About the LDS Church

To learn more about the LDS church, here is their official website to introduce people to the LDS church:
To Learn About the LDS Church
The Official Church Website

Here is a website that has many quotes by many of the apostles and prophets of the LDS church, on a variety of topics:
Living Prophet Website

Church Policy

Even though the LDS Church officially rejects the theory of evolution (see the 1909 Statement, linked to above, and the Book of Mormon, Alma chapter 30, among many other documents), no book or article which is involved in scientific debates or which discusses the scientific issues of the theory of evolution, even if it strongly supports official church doctrine, is endorsed by the LDS church unless it is part of an official church publication.

The gospel deals with eternal and unchanging truths but all of the fields of science constantly change as new discoveries are made. Thus, the church does not establish any scientific claim as being absolute.

As a result, the books and articles written by R. Webster Kehr represent the opinions of the author and are too scientific to be published or endorsed by the LDS church.

About The Author, R. Webster Kehr

I am an LDS "creation scientist" (i.e. anti-evolutionist) with a B.S. in mathematics (1972) and accounting (1974) from BYU.

My wife Marit is from Norway. We met in Provo, Utah a month before I left on my mission to California. She is a genealogist and we have seven children and 19 grandchildren - scattered from Idaho to Georgia.

We live in the Topeka, Kansas Stake and I work one evening a week in the Kansas City Temple of the LDS church.

Contact Information

Whether you have a question or a comment, please feel free to email me. I love to communicate with students about the theory of evolution.

(My email address is camouflaged to avoid web crawlers)


Note: Due to changes in search engine algorithms, this area is reserved for additional keywords:
This website is primarily about Prophets versus Evolution, meaning Evolution versus Prophets.
This is an intelligent Design article for Mormons or Latter-Day Saints.
And this manuscript also deals with Prophets versus Darwin, meaning Darwin versus Prophets.
It includes detailed discussions about Prophets or Evolution in addition to Evolution or Prophets.
This website discusses in detail the topic of intelligent design for Mormonism.
Included are large dicussions about Mormonism versus Evolution, and furthermore Evolution versus Mormonism.
Creation Scientists forget that God without Living Prophets is like mashed potatoes without gravy.
Intense discussions and debates about Mormonism or Evolution as opposed to Evolution or Mormonism are part of this website.
This LDS website, loyal to LDS doctrines, is mainly about Mormons versus Darwin, meaning Darwin versus Mormons.
This LDS website, by a member, is about Mormons versus Evolution, meaning Evolution versus Mormons.
These free articles and books are clearly and intentionally about intelligent Design website for Mormons.
This site also includes long discussions regarding Mormonism versus Darwin, plus Darwin versus Mormonism.
This website about living prophets and evolution does not forget to discuss Mormonism or Intelligent Design.
The details do not exclude the issues of Prophets or Darwin in addition to Darwin or Prophets.
This website definitely is mainly about Mormons or Darwin and not incidentally about Darwin or Mormons.
It intentionally includes discussions about Mormons or Evolution and not accidentally about Evolution or Mormons.
This website carefully includes the important topic of intelligent design and Mormonism.
There is no doubt that this website is an intelligent Design for Latter-Day Saints or Mormons website.
Creation Scientists remember to talk about God, but they forget to talk about living prophets.
What good is God without Living Prophets to lead the people of God? But it is primarily about Mormonism or Darwin as opposed to Darwin or Mormonism.
This prophets or evolutioln website includes chapters and discussions about Mormonism and Intelligent Design.
There is no doubt at all that this website is inclusive of intelligent Design for Mormons.
Does the Mormon church have a creation scientist?
Webster Kehr is the Creation Scientist of the Mormon Church
The Creation Scientist of the Mormon Church is Webster Kehr