|
Note: This website contains four free eBooks and many free articles. Links from one article to another are in blue and when you click a blue link the new article will generally open in a new window so you won't lose your place.
About The Author Of The "Prophets Or Evolution" Website (A Retired Cancer Researcher)My name is R. Webster Kehr. I am an ex-Marine, Viet Nam veteran who was seriously wounded in action (yes, I have a purple heart). I live in Missouri, near Kansas City. By profession I am a retired, world famous cancer researcher!!! Let me say something about cancer. Here is a fact: herbalists and homeopaths were CURING CANCER for more than 100 years before DNA was discovered in 1953!!! And the natural cancer treatments of today's experts are far, far better than even ten years ago because today's natural medicine cancer researchers know much more about what is going on inside of cancer cells and they have a lot more treatment options!!! Hint: they know how to revert cancer cells into normal cells (so much for the totally absurd "theory" that DNA damage causes cancer)!!!
If you have any interest in safe, highly effective natural cancer treatments, please study this article - remember this is a link to another article so click this blue link and the article will open in a new window: If you want even more information about natural cancer treatments and/or E.D., Alzheimer's, and other health conditions, go to the very bottom of this home page, which also has a yellow background and read the "Truth About Cancer" article. This article will point you in the right direction to even more articles about natural cancer treatments). There is also a section of articles specific to members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (i.e. Mormons). To find this section just search for the words: Additional Section. My email address is also in the bottom section of this home page. |
|
Welcome To The www.ProphetsOrEvolution.com WebsiteThe atheists and evolutionists claim that there is no God and that "evolution" (and other forces) are powerful and intellgient forces in nature which have created the Universe and everything in it that is not man-made, such as cells, the process of cell divisions (e.g. where one cell divides into two cells as the fetus is growing into a baby), the creation of DNA for all species, the sequence of nucleotides on all DNA strands, the oceans, the moon, the galaxies, etc. etc. But there is a problem. "Evolution" is not a tangible object or a physical process that can create things!! Evolution is only a claim or belief that there is no God. Theories and beliefs only exist inside of people's brains, they cannot create physical things!!! Only tangible things can create other tangible things!!! Let me repeat that: Only tangible things can create other tangible things!!! Get that through our head: Only tangible things can create other tangible things!!! But "evolution" and imaginary processes are not tangible and they are not a force in nature such as gravity or wind or sunlight!! In short, "evolution" is nothing more than a claim or belief that there is no God!! That's it!!! Evolution is not a physical object or a force that can do things, must less do things intelligently!! Evolution has no arms to create cells or DNA, it has no legs to travel, and evolution has no brain to design and intelligently sequence the nucleotides on any DNA strand and evolution cannot create the many different types of cells which are needed for the one million species of animals currently on this planet, all of which have both males and females whose DNA must align in an incredibly precise way!!! How can I make this any more clear!!!!!! Superman, the tooth fairy, the flying spaghetti monster, the theory of evolution , Mickey Mouse, etc. are all exactly the same thing - a make-believe fantasy!!! None of these fantasies can pick up a deck of cards, cook a dinner or design, create and sequence a single DNA strand!!! So if there is no God, as claimed by the atheists/evolutionists, then what would be the force in nature that created human DNA and the DNA for all other species??? The atheists and evolutionists have no choice except to claim that the Universe, cells, DNA, etc. were all created by UNINTENTIONAL, DIRECTIONLESS, PURPOSELESS, MINDLESS ACCIDENTS!!! However, the atheists and evolutionists will never use the term "accidents" (except in the case of the Big Bang) because they know that no one would believe them if they used the word "accidents" instead of the imaginary word "evolution"!!! The atheists/evolutionists will always pretend that the imaginary and invisible evolution is massively more intelligent than human beings - who do not understand all of the DNA for any living thing!!! By the way, the Big Bang really happened (this was proven by the discovery of "Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation"), but it did not happen by a series of accidents as the atheists/evolutionists claim. Accidents cannot cram all of the atoms in a Universe into one small object (perhaps the size of a beach ball) and then explode this object!!! As another example, human beings do not know how to sequence the nucleotides on the DNA strand for an ant, much less how to sequence the nucleotides on the DNA for an extinct animal species for which scientists currently have little or no DNA!!! Scientists can create a DNA strand, and that is amazing - bravo!!! It is the sequencing of the nucleotides on the DNA that they will never will be able to do!! They will know why they will never be able to sequence all of a DNA strand for any dead or living thing when they understand the Sixteen Cells Mystery article which I will talk about below. As that article will explain, DNA is not used in the way that scientists think it is used!! DNA is not a computer program, much of DNA is a database which is why male and female DNA can align. It is much easier to align two databases than two computer programs. But God can do either of these things. In summary, just like the fact that the imaginary "evolution" cannot create a cell or a DNA strand, mindless accidents also cannot create a cell or a DNA strand!!! Neither humans, nor Superman, nor Batman, nor evolution, nor accidents can sequence the nucleotides on a DNA strand so that this DNA strand can create (via millions or billions or trillions of cell divisions) a new species or bring back to life an extinct species (e.g. a Woolly Mammoth)!!! But even if they could sequence the DNA for an extinct animal species, they could never bring that species back to life without God providing a spirit for that animal!!! The Sixteen Cells Mystery article, that I will link to below, proves that!!! Only God can create a spirit!!!
Does God Exist??The typical young person today goes to church on the weekends and is told there is a God, but during the week in school they may be taught that the theory of evolution is true and there is no God. Because of the teaching of the theory of evolution (i.e. the religion of atheism) in schools, many, many young people of all religions have lost their faith in God and have quit going to church, or if they are taken to church by their parents, they will go to church but they will not believe anything they hear!!! Studies on this issue indicate that the loss of faith in God, caused by the teaching of the theory of evolution, can start as early as middle-school!!! But that is the very goal and purpose of the proponents of the theory of evolution - to convince people that there is no God!!! But as this website demonstrates, in hundreds of different ways, the three members of the Godhead are very much alive and well!!! AND WOW ARE THEY SMART (Hint: They are Gods)!!! This will become obvious when I talk about permutations of nucleotides. Without an incredibly intelligent God, we would literally not be here!!!
Even during the life of Christ, God was well aware that there would be false doctrines about the existence of God (i.e. claiming there is no God is the very purpose of the theory of evolution) which would eventually span the world. This is what Christ said in the book of Matthew in the Bible (Matthew 18:6-10) about those who decieve others about the divinity of Christ (the key versus are highlighted): Did you notice the phrase in verse 7: "woe to that man by whom the offence cometh!" The Savior was speaking symbolically when He was talking about the guilty parties deforming themselves. He was using this example to emphasize the potential eternal ramifications of those who try to convince others that Christ was not who He and His prophets have always said He was!!! And His follwers today still preach about Christ!!! The theory of evolution is precisely designed to get people to believe that Christ was not the Son of God and that God does not exist!!! From Charles Darwin of old to Richard Dawkins today, there are many people preaching that Christ was not divine!!! By the way, no one can claim that Christ did not exist as he is a well-proven historical figure using documents written shortly after His life (other than the Bible). The atheists and evolutionists can only claim that Christ was not the Savior of the world. Being "cast into everlasting fire" for "offend(ing) one of these little ones which believe in me [i.e. Christ]" does not sound like something a person should set as a goal!!! Don't mess with anyone in the Godhead, they can be your best friend or your worst nightmare!!! Like the Bible, the Book of Mormon was also written by ancient prophets, but the Book of Mormon was mostly written by prophets who lived in the Americas. The last Book of Mormon prophet completed the book in 421 A.D., but the Book of Mormon was not translated and published until 1830. You should note that the Book of Mormon was published 29 years before Darwin's first book on evolution was published in 1859. So the Book of Mormon was not reacting to the theory of evolution - it was predicting it!!! So when the Book of Mormon was criticizing the theory of evolution, and some of those who support the theory of evolution, the Book of Mormon could not use the word "evolution" (because this word did not exist in ancient times or perhaps before 1859) yet the prophets knew it was coming!!!
The big difference between the Bible and the Book of Mormon is that the Book of Mormon is nowhere near as diplomatic as the Bible with regards to some of those who push evolution and atheism for profit!!! These versus are part of a prophesy about some of the atheists and evolutionists in our day. The punishment of becoming "like unto the son of perdition" is a MASSIVELY STRONG PUNISHMENT though we have no details about it as this is the only place in the Book of Mormon where it is mentioned!!! Whether it is an eternal punishment or not I do not know (Note: I ask this question because the punishment of a "Son of Perdition" is an eternal punishment so I assume the punishment of "like unto the son of perdition" may also be an eternal punishment)!!! In short, the requirement is that these people promote atheism and/or the theory of evolution for profit and in the process they deny that Christ was the Savior and they mock the claims of the miracles of Christ!!! That is not a good idea if you want to have a good day on Judgment Day!!!
Who Qualifies??We have a very, very good idea of some of those who qualify for this horrific punishment!!! Later on this home page I will link to a web page that has an amazing speech given by an apostle of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (i.e. Mormon), Elder Jeffrey R. Holland, which mentions four of those who easily qualify for this punishment on paper (i.e. Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, Daniel Dennett, and the late Christopher Hitchens). But I suspect that hundreds of other people are also at very, very high risk for obtaining this punishment on paper. But only God can make the final judgment!!! All we can do is warn these people and we can warn those who believe them. These versus make it very clear that God has a serious attitude towards some people, such as Richard Dawkins, who is the role model for how to become "like unto the son of perdition"!!! And the Book of Mormon was published more than 110 years before Richard Dawkins was born!!! And the Book of Mormon was originally written many hundreds of years ago!!! God knew all of this no later than A.D. 34-35 (when the book of Third Nephi chapter 29 was originally written)!!! God didn't like the theory of evolution long before Richard Dawkins, the late Christopher Hitchens, and many other professional atheists/evolutionists, came along who mock the miracles of Christ!!! Could a college or high school teacher, who actively promotes the theory of evolution in class, qualify for becoming "like unto the son of perdition??" Probably not in my opinion. The key scriptures on this subject seem to me to be for the professionals, who are very proactive in spreading their doctrines of atheism and evolution. But never forget: God is the sole and final judge so anyone else's opinion (unless they are church authorities who are authorized to speak for God) is only speculation. I worry more about the eternal welfare of judges (who force teachers to teach the religion of atheism) than the teachers themselves. Those who argue that the theory of evolution should be taught in schools may claim that all scientists are evolutionists. However, the theory of evolution is NOT universally accepted by all scientists!! While there are hundreds of books which have been written to push the theory of evolution; there are also hundreds of books which have been written against the theory of evolution!! Four of these books are free and are on this website. Plus, in the scientific community, among those who have not written books, there are many scientists who are very much against the theory of evolution!!! Those who believe that the scientific evidence strongly supports a belief in God are called "creation scientists." The term "intelligent design" is also used to describe "creation science." The well-known and respected creation scientist Kent Hovind describes the atheists this way: "The atheists can't find God for the same reason a thief can't find a policeman." That quote hits the nail on the head!!! The atheists/evolutionists don't want to find God because of pride!!! Pride is the underlying, undergirding, driving force of the theory of evolution, it is certainly not science particularly after the discovery of DNA in 1953!!!! So let us discuss some of the tactics of the atheists and evolutionists!!!
Can One Species "Evolve" Into A New And Improved Species??The entire foundation of the theory of evolution is that one species can "evolve" into a new and improved species. The example that I frequently use is the claim of the atheists/evolutionists that humans "evolved" from bonobos or some other primate. While that claim may have been credible before the discovery of DNA, it certainly isn't credible after the discovery of DNA in 1953!!! There are both massive physical reasons and there are massive mathematical reasons that the DNA of a new species cannot be created by modifying the DNA of an old species by the mindless accidents of evolution.
Here is an article on the physical reasons that evolution cannot be true:
Here is an article on the mathematical reasons that evolution cannot be true: I will mention both of these articles later because they are so critical to the evolution debate. The permutation issues will also lead to the concept of the question: "where are the failures of evolution?" This turns out to be a major issue as you will see. Drawings about the steps of how humans evolved from some other primate are beyond ludicrous!!! Today, the theory of evolution debate is not about visualizations, it is about where DNA came from!! "Evolution" would require that the DNA of one species be "accidentally" modified into the DNA of a new and improved species!!! This would typically require many millions of changes to the DNA of the original species in order to create a new and improved species from an existing species (e.g. the modification of bonobo DNA into human DNA)!!! The human brain alone would require millions of changes to bonobo DNA!!! It gets worse. In order for humans to have "evolved" from bonobo (or pick any primate you want to pick), MILLIONS of random, mindless changes would have been needed to convert EACH OF FOUR DNA STRANDS OF THE BONOBO into FOUR VASTLY SUPERIOR DNA STRANDS FOR HUMANS and all of this must happen in the same latitude, longitude and timeframe or else the new male and female humans (who have the new human DNA) would not be able to mate in order to start the human race!!! And when done, these four new and improved DNA strands must align with each other at the function level!!! So the issues include mathematical issues (i.e. having the sequence of nucleotides on four DNA strands be changed and be an improvement) and physical issues (i.e. physically changing the DNA of one species into the DNA of another species) and latitude, longtitude and timeframe issues. And other issues.
Before going on I need to say something about sperm cells and ovums so you understand what I am going to talk about below. Let's look at the sperm cells and ovums of humans: The female has one or more ovums (i.e. eggs) which are gender neutral. It is the sperm cell (male sperm cell or female sperm cell) from the male, which gets to the ovum first, that will determine the sex of the baby!! There is literally a swimming race of sperm cells to get to the ovum first!!! I link to a cute YouTube video below which actually shows this race of sperm cells. The DNA sequence in every male sperm cell and the DNA sequence in every female ovum is unique!!! Identical twins are not made by the same sequence of nucleotides on a male sperm cell and a female ovum, what happens is that after the egg is fertilized, the fertilized egg divides in a certain way. All of these facts apply to every animal species. But getting back to evolution, how could a bonobo mother have two human children who in turn can have human children of their own!!! As mentioned above, to create a new species from an old species, requires four bonobo DNA strands to "evolve" into four new and improved human DNA strands!!! Let's dig deeper into this issue.
The Four New DNA Strands Which Are Needed To Create A New SpeciesHere are the four bonobo DNA strands I am talking about which must evolve into four human DNA strands so that the human race can begin (the minimum two new human male sperm cells and the minimum two human female ovums must be in the same generation so the bonobo mother can give birth to two human children who can grow up and have their own human children)!!! 1) Millions of mindless changes to a DNA strand in at least one bonobo male sperm cell in a male bonobo to create a human male sperm cell, 2) Millions of mindless changes to a DNA strand in at least one bonobo female sperm cell in a male bonobo to create a human female sperm cell (male and female DNA must always align (at the function level) in each generation of changes - which alone would totally destroy the theory of evolution), 3) Millions of mindless changes to a DNA strand in a gender-neutral ovum in a female bonobo (for the first male sperm cell [to create a male human] to fertilize), 4) Millions of mindless changes to a DNA strand in a second gender-neutral ovum in a female bonobo (for the second male sperm cell [to create a female human] to fertilize). And these four new human DNA strands, when completed, must align with each other at the function level!!! Also note that bonobos, like humans, would have many sperms cells involved in this swimming race, most of which are bonobo sperm cells which have not been modified by evolution so the two new human sperm cells must win the swimming race!!! There are also latitude, longitude and timeframe issues as I already mentioned. For example, if the first male human DNA was created by evolution one-thousand years before the first female human DNA was created by evolution, and the two bonobo mothers were 5,000 miles apart, you would not be reading this sentence if evolution were true!!! Plus, the bonobo parents (of the first human male and female) must not kill or abandon their human babies because human babies are really funny-looking to bonobos and human babies are really bad at climbing trees!!! It takes a lot of patience to raise human children (ask my wife, we had seven children). The probability that the same millions of mindless, random, accidental changes to four bonobo DNA strands could create four human DNA strands for the human race, and these changes must realistically be spread out over many generations (and each generation must have the changes in the same locations in order for the DNA to align in every generation) is both physically and mathematically and common sense absurd!!! To make things worse, human couples must eventually start having more than two human children so that the human race can begin to grow in numbers!!! Yet, the "evolution" of bonobo sperm cells and ovums into human sperm cells and ovums is precisely the foundation of the theory of evolution after the discovery of DNA in 1953!!! And there have been ten million animal species which have lived on this planet, all of which would have to go through the same process that humans would have to go through if evolution were true!!! That is forty-million highly sophisticated DNA strands created by the mindless accidents of evolution!!! By the way, only one million of these ten million species still exist. If evolution were true, the Cambrian Explosion cannot be explained!!! And if the theory of evolution were true, a really good genealogist could trace our ancestry (species to species) back to the "first living cell". Well, they are probably busy enough that they don't need that assignment.
The Two-Male DNA Alignment Issue - This Section Will Absolutely Blow Your Mind!!!!Let us look at the two types of male DNA strands in the sperm cells for any animal species. One creates a male baby and one creates a female baby. Both of them must align with the female DNA strand in her ovum. But if each of them aligns with the female DNA strand in the ovum, this implies that the two types of male DNA must align with each other (at the function level of course), yet one will lead to a male baby and one will lead to a female baby!!!!There is no specific reason that the two male DNA strands need to align with each other at the function level except for the fact that BOTH OF THEM must align with a female DNA strand at the function level. Here is the amazing thing: two male DNA strands must align with each other (at the function level but not at the nucleotide level), yet one of them will create a male baby and one of them will create a female baby!!! This is incomprehensible!!! Yet this fact applies to roughly 1,000,000 animals species which are currently on this planet and 9,000,000 extinct species of animals!!!
I want to show this somewhat graphically to emphasize my point. There are three kinds of DNA strands, for every existing species, which must align with each other: All three of these kinds of DNA are very, very different yet they must align with each other at the function level!!
Now let us ignore the third item in the above list and show the list again: What this means is that the two types of DNA in the male, one of which creates a male baby and one of which creates a female baby, must align with each other at the function level because both of them must align with the gender neutral DNA in the female ovum at the function level!!!! Yet one of these DNA strands will lead to a male baby and the other DNA strand will lead to a female baby!!! Yet they must align with each other at the function level!!!!!!!!!! This is absolutely unbelievable!!! Yet this concept applies to one million living animal species and nine million extinct animal species!!!! Two male DNA strands must align with each other at the function level, yet one will create a male baby and the other will create a female baby!!! NO WAY!!!!! But God has done this for ten million animal species, one million of which are alive today!!!
OK, well no one believes me (even though my first college degree was in mathematics), so here is a homework assignment tonight for human scientists. For some extinct species for which they only have (or a living species if the sequence of nucleotides in the male sperm cells, to create a female baby, is withheld from the scientists):
The task of scientists (or accidents if you prefer) is to create, without cheating: Good luck!!! I was born in 1946 so I am not going to live long enough for that to happen!!! Nor will my great-grandchildren live long enough (I don't have any yet, but I will soon)!!! In fact, scientists are NOT EVEN CLOSE to decoding the entire DNA strand of any species of plants, animals or insects!!! Now I will tell you why they will never be able to do this!! The article linked to in the next section will blow your mind because DNA is not what is controlling cell divisions from a fertilized egg into a crying baby!!! And to some degree the next section will tell you the truth about what DNA is really used for, so it potentially solves some of the issues we have already talked about.
The Sixteen Cells MysteryA human being starts out as a single fertilized egg. Via many trillions of cell divisions, a human baby is born nine-months later!!! I suspect that scientists assume that the DNA of the new baby is what is controlling call divisions. NOT A CHANCE!!! How can something that is 3.2 billion nucleoties long control the cell divisions to create a human baby who has about 37.2 trillion cells??
But that is just one of the reasons DNA cannot control cell divisions. There is an even bigger reason in the Sixteen Cells Mystery article. This article PROVES THAT DNA CANNOT BE CONTROLLING THESE CELL DIVISIONS!!!! And this article explains WHAT IS CONTROLLING THESE CELL DIVISIONS!!!! The "Sixteen Cells Mystery" applies to all animals (male and female), not just humans. So all animals have a spirit!! This should not surprise anyone because all living things require a spirit!!! So it is efficient for Heavenly Father to create the spirit so that the spirit can both create life and control the cell divisions. And spirits come from God!!! And this very concept can explain why the DNA of male sperm cells and female sperm cells can align with each other - because DNA is a database of information, not a computer program to control cell divisions!!!! So the length of the DNA strand is largely, if not entirely, dependant on the size of the database on the DNA!! This is why the above DNA strands can align with each other, because the database "fields" can align. That is impressive, but the really impressive thing about God is yet to be discussed (permutations). And this also destroys the theory of evolution because each species will have its own unique spirit and thus its own unique database. So if two animal species have the same size DNA, it has little or nothing to do with the complexity and sophistication of the species. To dig deeper, the spirit controls the cell divisions and the size of the DNA will be largely (if not entirely) dependent on the size of the database, meaning the size of the individual database elements (e.g. "fields") on the DNA strand!! The largest DNA strand on this planet, by a huge margin compared to human DNA, is for a fish, protopterus aethiopicus, which has 133 billion nucleotides on its DNA!!! Why a fish has such a gigantic database I do not know. Maybe God has a sense of humor or maybe He was bored one day. Let me briefly talk about "life." Scientists have tried to create life from non-life. They will NEVER be successful unless God cooperates and provides a spirit. I do not know if each bacteria has its own spirit or whether there is some general spirit for single-celled living things. Humans, and all other species, exist because of God!!! Yes, science has confirmed that the Biblical account of Adam and Eve IS TRUE!!! Your geneology chart has Noah and his wife (some Bible scholars think her name was Naamah) on it and Adam and his wife Eve on it!!! In other words, Adam and Eve are on mine and your pedigree chart, not some bonobo couple!!! Try saying that in some college biology class!!! I would do it, but then I am an ex-Marine so no one would dare disagree with me. But there is a significant reason why the theory of evolution tries to do away with a belief in Adam and Eve which I discuss in my Grand Council article which I link to below. As you read this home page, and the other articles on this website, keep asking yourself: "Could DNA and cells, for millions of animal species (there are about one million living animal species and about nine million extinct animal species which also needed DNA), the Universe, etc. have been created by nothing but blind, deaf and dumb accidents??" Now we will turn our attention to mathematics. Fasten your seat belt, this is one of the massive massive massive reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true.
Permutations Of Nucleotides And Related Issues
A "permutation" is a unique way to order (i.e. sequence) a set of objects, such as the set of nucleotides on a DNA strand. For example, here are five ways (from among several ways) that the letters 'A' and 'B' and 'C' can be ordered (i.e. sequenced), with redundancy (meaning any letter can be shown multiple times): That is not all of the permutations for these three letters, just a sample. There are a vast, vast number of possible unique permutations of nucleotide sequences for every animal species!!! (The next paragraph has one the best of the best reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true.) For example, as a baseline there are about 4500 atoms in this Universe!!! That is a very big number. However, the number of possible permutations of a human DNA strand (a human DNA strand has 3,200,000,000 nucleotides - meaning A, C, G, T), both male and female (male DNA in male sperm cells of the male and female DNA in female sperm cells of the male and the DNA in the ovum of the female which must align with both of the male DNA strands at the function level), is 43,200,000,000!! This number dwarfs the number of atoms in a billion, billion, billion Universes!!! Remember, it takes four human DNA strands to create the new human species. And each of the four DNA strands needs very specialized DNA from among 43,200,000,000 permutations of nucleotides!! Here is the key point: the vast, vast, vast, (literally insert the word "vast" one trillion more times) percent of these permutations would NOT create a viable human being or any other animal species. Yet four DNA strands (each with the same length) are needed to create every new animal species on this planet!!! But they key is that evolution is totally stupid and does everything randomly (well, actually evolution doesn't exist so I am using the term "evolution" instead of "accidents" to keep things simple). It you put together a totally random sequence of nucleotides, to simulate evolution, the probability that it would be good enough to create a human baby is far, far, far less that the probability of randomly picking a single correct atom from among a billion billion billion Universes the size of our Universe!!!!!!!!! If evolution were true, and the DNA for all species (not just humans) had been sequenced by accidents, there would literally be more worthless DNA strands (which did not have a viable permutation of nucleotides) laying on the ground on this planet, than there are atoms in a trillion, trillion, trillion, ... Universes!! Well, we can look at this another way. If evolution were true, there would not be enough atoms in a trillion, trillion, trillion, ..., Universes to create four viable DNA strands which would be needed to create all of the species on this planet via nothing but accidents (because there would be so many failures in the attempt to do this you would run out of atoms)!!! So where are the countless failures of unusable DNA strands created by nothing but invalid permutations?? There are none!!! Yes, occasionally there is a mutation to a DNA strand, but these are very rare compared to the massive, massive number of worthless DNA strands that evolution would create!!! And in science in general, accidents never make something more sophisticated!!! But also remember that four DNA strands, which must align with each other at the function level, are needed to create EACH OF THE 10 million animal species which have lived on this planet or currently live on this planet!!! That is 40,000,000 million DNA strands (needed to create 10,000,000 new animal species) that scientists do not understand just for animals!!! If the average animal DNA strand was 200,000,000 nucleotides long, that is 8,000,000,000,000,000 nucleotides!!! As always, it gets worse. This much DNA would have 48,000,000,000,000,000 permutations!!! This of course assumes that there are no spirits to direct the morphing of the embryo and that a DNA sequence solely controls this morphing. Which is bigger, the 4500 atoms in this Universe or the 48,000,000,000,000,000 permutations of nucleotides for all animal species which have or do exist on this planet!!! Permuations of nucleotides on DNA account for many of the massive, massive reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true!!!
Here again is my article on "Permutations" if you didn't read it the first time:
The Heart And Soul Of Evolution - Physically Changing the DNA of One Species Into the DNA of a New And Improved SpeciesWhile the prior section was about the mathematical reasons the DNA of one species cannot be changed into the DNA of another species, this section is about the physical reasons the DNA of one species cannot be changed into the DNA of a new and improved species. The heart and soul of the theory of evolution is that one species can evolve into a new and superior species. For example, scientists may claim that humans "evolved" from bonobo. This means that the theory of evolution of today (Darwin knew nothing about DNA) requires that the DNA of a bonobo [or some other primate] can be accidentally and physically changed into the DNA of humans!!! However, neither "evolution" nor "accidents" can physically make a single change to an existing DNA strand which is inside of a cell (e.g. every bonobo DNA strand is inside of a cell), and DNA strands are always inside of cells, in order to create a new and improved DNA strand which can create a new and improved species of animal (e.g. humans)!! For example, if you break a DNA strand (which would be required many, many times to change the sequence of nucleotides on a DNA strand from one animal species (e.g. bonobo) into a new and improved animal species (e.g. humans)), there is nothing inside the cell that can put the DNA strand back together!!! In a similar manner, if you broke a ladder completely apart, so you could change the sequence of rungs on the ladder, you would have a difficult time putting the ladder back together. But with DNA it is impossible to put the ladder (i.e. DNA) back together because there is nothing inside the cell that can do that, much less do that intelligently!!!
Here again is an article on this subject (study this article because it is one of the key physical reasons that evolution cannot be true): Thus, with the discovery of DNA, the entire foundation of the theory of evolution (that one species can "evolve" into a new and improved species), BECAME FALSE BOTH BECAUSE OF MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL REASONS!!! Furthermore, the claim of evolution that the rearranging and adding and subtracting of nucleotides always creates (according to evolution) a superior species of plants, animals or insects is nonsense!!!! For every success there would be MANY, MANY, MANY (insert the word "MANY" a thousand more times) TRILLIONS of failures!! Where are the failures??? As I already mentioned, there are not enough atoms in our Universe (this is not an exaggeration) to supply atoms to all of the failures of accidents/evolution if evolution were true!!! By now you should understand why the theory of evolution is false: evolution IS PURELY IMAGINARY and accidents have an I.Q. of ZERO!!! The atheists and evolutionists must claim that the forty million most sophisticated computer programs (actually databases) on this planet (the number of unique DNA strands needed to create from scratch the more than ten million animal species which have been, or are, on this planet) all came to exist by blind, deaf and dumb accidents with no evidence of a significant number of failures!!! If the theory of evolution were true, then statistics mean nothing and computer programmers should be able to write computer operating systems and computer programs and computer language compilers by using nothing but accidents (i.e. random number generators)!!! Why don't they do this??? Ask one of them!!! And computers are a heck of a lot faster than Mother Nature!!! Everything we have talked about would have had to be done completely by totally mindless accidents!!!
Use your mental calculator and do the math: The "bottom line" is that imaginary evolution plus mindless accidents collectively have an I.Q. of ZERO!! Humans should not exist!!! Now let's talk about some serious science that will blow your mind!!! This is definitely something that Superman did not do!!!! I am sure that the people at M.I.T., and other schools, would agree.
|
|
The Physical ConstantsThis section will talk about the physical constants in our Universe. The probabilities that the pure accidents of the theory of evolution could have created the physical constants in our Universe, are so bad that sometimes the atheists and evolutionists claim there have been an infinite number of Universes and our Universe just happened to have the right set of physical constants in physics!! There probably are an infinite number of Universes, but rest assured that if there are, every one of them was made by God and every one of them has the correct set of physical constants and every Universe has life on many of its planets!!! Do you really think that Superman or the "flying spaghetti monster" flew around the Universe and created the physical constants in physics??? Without physical constants (well, without the force that creates the physical constants, which is probably Tesla's aether), there would not be a Universe for us to live on!!! Let me quickly say something about Tesla's aether. Tesla (and myself for that matter) should have won a Nobel Prize in physics for detecting the aether (as I did also when I worked at Sprint many years ago). But there were two reasons he did not win a Nobel Prize. First, Tesla could create free energy and the massively powerful energy companies would never allow someone who could create free energy to win a Nobel Prize. But perhaps more importantly such a prize would have made Einstein look supid because Einstein believed that light consisted of photons. These "photons" were the "tiny packets"of light that Einstein talked about. But with Tesla, light was a "wave" though the aether. The corruption in the physics community is so bad that when I detected aether, and wrote my article about it, five physics journals told me not to even submit my paper to them because they were not going to read it!!!! The planet we live on - ugh. In any case, some of these physical constants exist because of aether. Here is a link to an amazing, amazing, amazing document from M.I.T. regarding the "Fundamental Physical Constants" and "Energy Equivalents." This document is far beyond amazing - only the people at M.I.T could have written this document!!!
Slowly page all the way down to the very bottom of the article:
Here is an amazing YouTube video which does not have anywhere near as many items, but it is worth watching. It also talks about the Multiverse: Yes, God is alive and well and the Biblical account of Adam and Eve is true!!! While "evolution" may be a great recruiting tool for the atheists/evolutionists, the zero I.Q. of the purely imaginary theory of evolution plus the zero I.Q. of accidents have never created a single cell or a single DNA strand (0 + 0 = 0) or a single physical constant!! The theory of evolution is a pure fantasy!! By the way, a man fully qualified to nominate me for a Nobel Prize in medicine (because of my cancer research) told me that he was going to nominate me for the Nobel Prize in Medicine. Shortly after telling me what he was going to do, he emailed me back to withdraw his offer because he realized how totally corrupt the Nobel Prize in Medicine is because the prize is totally controlled by the pharmaceutical industry. I could go on but I won't.
Cell Biology And MicrobiologyIn Darwin's day it was possible to believe in the theory of evolution because scientists in his day knew nothing about DNA (DNA was discovered in 1953) and they knew nothing about the physical constants and they knew almost nothing about cells. But today, with what is known about DNA, the physical constants and cells, the theory of evolution is complete and absolute nonsense!! I am sure that a person with a PhD in Cell Biology or Microbiology could write a website far bigger than this website just talking about why cell biology and microbiology are absolute proofs that the theory of evolution cannot be true!!! Here is a quote from that section by Michael Denton about cells:
An "irreducibly complex system" is, by definition, a sequence of complex chemical reactions, such that if any one of the chemical reactions was not there, or failed, the end result of the chemical reaction will fail and the entire cell may be at risk!!! Some of these chemical reactions are used to create ATP molecules in the cell. ATP is a key molecule inside every cell. In fact, when something blocks ATP energy, and the cell has low ATP energy, the cell is DEFINED to be cancerous!! Michael Denton did not say there was one such sequence of chemical chain reactions in cells, but "tens of thousands" of such systems!!! You should see the size of my cell biology books!!! And I am sure he was also thinking about amoeba when he said what he said!!!
Here is an entire article on Cell Biology (you could call it an introduction to an introduction [60 more times] to Cell Biology and Microbiology:
What Does God Think About Those Who Are Very Proactive In Pushing The Theory Of Evolution??Given that the entire purpose of the theory of evolution is to draw people away from God, and given that God has an attitude of his own, it should not surpise anything that God has had some choice words (in the scriptures) for the atheists and evolutionists. We have already talked about the Bible and the Book of Mormon, but let's dig deeper. The Book of Mormon was published in 1830. If you are rich you might be able to buy an 1830 edition of the Book of Mormon. Now I should say that all of the Book of Mormon was originally written before or in 421 A.D.!! The Book of Mormon was only translated and published in 1830. But no matter what you believe, it is a well-known, and easily provable fact, that the Book of Mormon was published in 1830, regardless of when the original prophets wrote it. Darwin's first book was published in 1859!!! So the Book of Mormon was not reacting to the theory of evolution, it was predicting and preparing the members of the church for what was coming!!!!!! I should also mention that the word "evolution" did not exist when the Book of Mormon was originally written or when it was originally published in 1830. The word "evolution" probably did not exist until Darwin's first book in 1859. Given that the primary purpose of the theory of evolution is to draw people from a belief in God; if you were God, what would you think about people who make a significant part of their living trying to convince others that you do not exist?? I will tell you the answer to that question. There is a special place in hell for some of those who are trying to convince people that there is no God!!!! Yup, the Book of Mormon talks about this as we have already talked about. So let's talk about someone today who is considered a "living prophet" by those in the Mormon church (including myself). One of the greatest talks ever given on this planet, on any subject, was a talk given by an apostle of the Mormon church (Elder Jeffrey R. Holland) at BYU in which he mentioned Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, Daniel Dennett and the late Christopher Hitchens (the most obnoxious of the four)!!! This is a must listen to or read speech unlike any other ever given!!!!!! In this talk, Elder Holland talks about secularism, which is an umbrella which includes atheism and evolution as they are the two atheistic arms of secularism.
(Click the triangle arrow icon [under his name] so you can watch and listen to it at the same time.) President Nelson (the president of the Mormon church) and Elder Holland (one of the apostles in the Mormon church) have both been openly and verbally anti-evolution.
By the way, there is a spectacular set of short videos on the life of Christ which are free and online!!! Anyone can watch them:
Measuring The Damage Of The Theory of EvolutionWhile the theory of evolution versus creation science debate is heated, the debate is far more than academic because many students are victims of this battle!! As a result of the teaching of evolution in many schools, countless middle school, high school and college students have lost their belief in God or they may question their belief in God. Fortunately, the damage done by evolution can be measured. Studies funded by the very well known evangelical creationist Ken Ham have shown that most of the loss of testimony of God occurs in middle school and high school, not in college!! Ken Ham's conclusion, based on statistics, is that students are already gone by the time they get to college!! But of course, those who still have a testimony of God when they enter college will have that testimony challenged in college depending on what courses they take. I should also note that the evangelicals do not have the Pearl of Great Price of the Mormon church. Many things in the early chapters of Genesis were damaged over the many centuries between when it was written and today. The Pearl of Great Price exists largely to "fix" the damage done to the early chapters of Genesis.
Here is a link to the Ken Ham video: "Already Gone - Part 1" (22 minutes): In these video hes has some brilliant comments about Noah's Ark.
If you were not automatically taken to Part 2 - here is "Already Gone - Part 2": I should emphasize that the Mormon church has the "Pearl of Great Price" which "fixes" many of the errors in Genesis. In other words, the "Pearl of Great Price" is what the early prophets actually wrote before sections of the Bible were damaged (largely during the Dark Ages) either intentionally or by accident or by poor translators. In addition, the "flood" of Noah may have been responsible how many of the nine million extinct species became extinct!!! And soaking in water (which was a global event) will vastly alter the "dating" of fossils.
A Strong Warning To Those Who Are Required To Teach/Endorse/Force The Theory of Evolution To StudentsIt is unfortunate that in many school districts in the United States, and outside of the United States, the theory of evolution is taught (e.g. in biology classes) as if it were a proven scientific fact. Not only is the theory of evolution not proven, the theory of evolution is scientific nonsense as this website demonstrates over and over again!! Yet many teachers endorse the claims of the theory of evolution in their classes!! Because of the teaching of the doctrines of evolution in the classrooms countless youth, starting in middle school and continuing in high school and college, no longer believe in God and may no longer go to church (mentally and/or physically)!! The evolution debate is not an academic exercise to entertain people, it is a debate for the souls of men and women, boys and girls!!!! I have already talked about the "like unto the Son of Perdition" punishment. My point here is that teachers should stay as far away as possible from supporting evolution!!! AS A MINIMUM A TEACHER SHOULD MAKE IT VERY, VERY, VERY CLEAR TO THEIR CLASS THAT NOT ALL SCIENTISTS AGREE WITH THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION!!!!!! I link to an article on this topic later.
Comments To Judges
Judges sometimes think they are above God. Nope!!! Every human being on his planet, whether a President or a Judge or a car mechanic will reap what they have sown!! Their "reward" will happen at the Second Comimg of Christ. At that time they will very, very, very, very quickly realize that there is a God and that God is far, far, far beyond human comprehension.
Here is more about the Millennium on the BYU website:
Natural Selection"Natural selection" is the claim that the stronger species survive. Yes, I agree!!! But "natural selection," has never created a new species!!! And natural selection never makes a species stronger!! Natural selection can only eliminate weak species WHICH ALREADY EXIST which are killed via environment or they are killed by other species. Natural selection is only effective when two or more species already exist!!! In other words, natural selection is purely an elimination process that eliminates weak species!! Natural selection is not a creation process!!! In other words, natural selection reduces the number of species on a planet, it never increases the number of species on a planet!!! Let me say that last part again: natural selection reduces the number of species on this planet!!! Remember, there are nine million extinct species which have lived on this planet. Some may have gone extinct because of weather changes, others may have gone extinct because some other species killed them off or because their food supply was cut-off. My point is that the only thing that natural selection does is eliminate weak species!!! NATURAL SELECTION WORKS AGAINST EVOLUTION. Evolution is trying to create new and improved species (which it has never done) and natural selection is trying to eliminate existing species (which it does all the time)!!! Natural selction will easily win that battle because natural selection does not have to deal with the statistics of creating new DNA. A problem with natural selection is that because DNA cannot be created and sequenced by evolution, natural selection should have nothing to do because there should not be any species to "select" from!! But given that God has created millions of species of animals, natural selection is a perfectly valid scientific concept!!! While natural selection is a valid concept, IT IS ONLY AN ELIMINATION PROCESS. Some people might claim that natural selection increases the overall quality of species on this planet by eliminating the weak species. That is true, but do not infer from this that natural selection can create a single new species!!!
This article will go into great detail about why Natural Selection has absolutely nothing to do with evolution:
Links To The Four Free eBooks On This WebsiteThe primary information on this website comes from the home page and the articles, some of which have alrady been linked to!!! However, when you think you have a good handle on the home page and the main articles on this website, and for those who want to dig deeper and tackle entire books on the theory of evolution, this website has FOUR FREE EBOOKS ON IT!!!
There is an article which links to these four eBooks:
Important NotesNote #1: When I realize that I have made a mistake (e.g. for a long time I thought that DNA is what controlled cell divisions) it can take a year or more before I get around to updating and fixing all of the articles that have this mistake!!! So you will be seeing articles or chapters on this website which mention that DNA controls cell divisions for many months to come!!!
Note #2: Don't Forget: please, please, please tell your friends about this website, such as via social media or email. There is no other website on the Internet even close to this website on the subject of why the theory of evolution cannot be true!!! G.o.o.g,l,e is a piece of garbage from the perspective of those who have websites. While I do get a few hits from G.o.o.g,l,e, I can assure you they are very, very rare given the size of this website. So it is up to YOU to spread the word!!!
OK, the introduction is over, fasten your seat belt and let the website begin!!
The Sophistication Of Human DNAThe most sophisticated computer programs on this planet are human DNA which contain the instructions to create a male and female human baby via trillions of cell divisions. Of course, we just talked about the critical involvement of the spirit in controlling these cell divisions and how most of DNA is a database of information to tweek what the spirit is doing. The human DNA strand, which is inside the fertilized egg of a new human mother, contains 3.2 billion nucleotides (A, C, G, or T) , which is a computer program that is so sophisticated that a single cell, with a single DNA strand (the DNA strand is seven feet long but it is coiled up to fit inside of a cell that cannot be seen with the naked eye), namely the fertilized egg inside of a mother-to-be, has the intelligence on the DNA to create an entire human baby, via 30 trillion cell divisions, who has 30 trillion cells and 60,000 miles of blood vessels, etc. The 60,000 miles of blood vessels in this newborn baby would wrap around the earth at the equator twice, with 10,000 miles of blood vessels left over!! When the baby is born he or she will have an incredible brain which is connected to a massive nervous system, a skull to protect the brain, a spine to protect the spinal cord (the spinal cord is a cylindrical bundle of nerve fibers), two eyes which are connected to the nervous system, a beating heart, a liver, a pancreas, 300 bones (which eventually fuse into 206 bones), etc. etc.!! The DNA in a sperm cell of the father of the baby contributes part of the DNA for the new baby and the DNA in the mother's ovum (egg) contributes part of the DNA for the new baby. Thus, the DNA strands from the mother and father must align with each other!!! But it is even more complicated than that. Men actually have two types of DNA strands: the DNA in the "male sperm cells" which will lead to a male baby and the DNA in the "female sperm cells" which will lead to a female baby. The DNA in the mother's egg/ovum is gender-neutral.
So if a male sperm cell gets to the mother's egg first (along with its DNA), a male baby will result. If a female sperm cell gets to the mother's egg first (along with its DNA), a female baby will result. The sex of the baby is literally a swimming race of sperm cells to get to the ovum first!! See this amazing YouTube video: But note that there are three types of DNA strands - 2 from the father (one male sperm cell to create a male baby and one female sperm cell to create a female baby), though only one is used each time conception happens [the one that gets to the ovum first]!! And both male DNA strands must align with the female DNA in her ovum!! But the alignment is more sophisticated than you think. The father's DNA to create a male baby has features on it to create the male sex organs. Likewise, the father's DNA to create a female baby has features to create the very different female sex organs. Yet the three human DNA strands still need to align with each other whether the baby will be a male or female!!
The "Path" To Human DNA (The Death of the Theory of Evolution)(My first college degree was in mathematics so I love this section) Let us suppose that from the "first living cell" to human DNA there were 5,000 consecutive intermediate species. Remember, we are only looking at the path of species sequentially between the first living cell and human DNA if the atheists and evolutionists are correct. All other species are ignored in this section. The number of nucleotides on the "first living cell" would likely have been 5,000 nucleotides. Human DNA is 3,200,000,000 nucleotides. At 5,000 additional nucleotides per species, there would have been 640,000 consecutive intermediate species between the first living cell and human DNA!!! Let us estimate the age of the planet earth at 5,000,000,000 years (www.space.com estimates our earth is 4.54 billion years old). This is about 7,812 new species every year. Plus there would be many different paths from the "first living cell" to the massive number of animal species currently on this earth (and don't forget the male-female alignment issues on each and every path!!!). Plus, the DNA for every species which has ever lived on this earth (even for an ant) has DNA that is so sophisticated that scientists cannot figure out how it works!!! Obviously scientists today cannot figure out how to design the DNA for any species, yet these same scientists say that "accidents" (i.e. evolution) have created all of these species!!! We have already talked about the fact that DNA cannot be changed!!! But even if DNA could be changed as easily as a child eats a candy bar, the theory of evolution is statistical nonsense!!! Plus, if evolution were true your cat (let us assume your cat is named "misty") would also be descended from the "first living cell." So you should start calling your cat: "cousin misty." The "path" concept of humans evolving from a first living cell proves how ridiculous the theory of evolution is. In addition, DNA cannot be changed, it can only be damaged. There are also many statistical problems with this theory caused by the discovery of DNA. In other words, the path concept is impossible because DNA cannot be modified. Yet, if evolution were true there must be a "path" of species from the "first living cell" to human DNA and every other species!!!
Comparing DNA to Computer ProgramsThe evolution debate made a dramatic change when DNA was discovered in 1953!! Scientists now had to explain how DNA came to exist by a series of accidents!! The atheists don't believe in God or spirits, so let us assume that humans do not have a spirit and that the DNA is what contains the information to control cell divisions. Thus, a single fertilized egg contains the instructions to create a baby animal, even humans, via millions or billions or trillions of cell divisions!! However, scientists don't have the SLIGHEST CLUE how DNA can create a new baby via millions or billions or trillions of cell divisions!!! Actually, it is estimated that a new human baby has 37.2 trillion cells!!! A DNA strand has 3.2 billion nucleotides on it. Thus, for every nucleotide on a human DNA strand, there are 11,625 cells!!! That is how many cells each nucleotide must control!!! I don't think so!!! We can compare human DNA to a computer program, though human DNA is vastly more sophisticated than any computer program ever written by humans. If evolution were true, computer programmers would not be needed because random number generators (i.e. to simulate evolution or accidents) could create the source code or object code for every new computer program on earth!! Furthermore, to create a new and improved computer program from an existing computer program; all you would need to do is apply a random number generator to the source code or object code of the old computer program. This process should work every time if evolution is true because there is no evidence of failures of the "accidents" of evolution!! But random number generators could NEVER create the source code or object code for a new computer program, nor could random number generators modify the souce code or object code of an existing viable computer program and create a new computer program which has new and improved features!!! Any computer programmer who was told to write new source code or object code for a new computer program (or to improve an existing computer program) with random number generators, would just laugh at the idea. Yet this same computer programmer may believe in the theory of evolution because he/she does not understand what DNA does. It is now known that human DNA is a massive database and likely includes some "object code" of a massively complex computer program. But there is no "source code" and there is no compiler.
To demonstrate this with bar charts, see Chapter 30 in the Prophets Or Evolution eBook and look at the bar charts in the section "A Higher Viewpoint." This chapter has four bar charts which prove, beyond any doubt, that accidents cannot create a viable DNA strand. And these bar charts do not even discuss the physical construction of DNA!! Click: The flat graph is what evolution would create because the selections of which nucleotide are used would be totally random!!! The term "evolution" in the time of Charles Darwin and the term "evolution" today mean totally different things because Darwin knew almost nothing about cells and he knew nothing about DNA!!! Darwin only saw the visual form of animals. Can the atheists and evolutionists explain how accidents created the DNA for several million species by a series of pure, undirected accidents?? Absolutely Not!!
What Computer Programming Can Teach Us About EvolutionWe have already talked about the problems with creating a new species from an old species by mentioning that existing DNA cannot be physically or intelligently modified. But there are other reasons a new species cannot be created from an old species even if DNA could be modified. Let us compare the claim that a new species can be created from an old species to the computer language C#.
When writing or changing a computer program in C# there are three steps:
Now suppose that a perfectly good C# computer program needed a major upgrade to add a new feature to the program. There are two options to make the changes: No computer programmer on this planet would choose the second option!! It would be a waste of time and would totally destroy the old program and it would not have any new or old features that worked!!! Yet Option #2 is precisely the way that evolution must work!!! There is no "source code" for DNA, there is only "object code" on the DNA. Evolution can only RANDOMLY change the DNA via random mutations!! Yet the atheists and evolutionists claim that the DNA of a perfectly good species can be randomly mutated (by evolution) and the random mutations will create a new and improved species EVERY TIME!!! This is nonsense because DNA includes computer programs vastly more sophisticated than any computer program ever written by any team of human beings!!! And the DNA only contains the object code!! With the discovery of DNA the evolution debate should have left the domain of biologists and been put under the domain of statisticians looking at DNA. But that will never happen because there are many atheists who need the theory of evolution to sell their books and get new converts to atheism!! In addition to things on this earth, scientists also cannot create a single sun from scratch. And is it logical to think that our sun and all of the stars (e.g. the supergiant star VY Canis Majoris), galaxies, superclusters of galaxies, etc. in the Universe came to exist by an accidental explosion called the Big Bang? While both sides of the evolution debate support the Big Bang because of the discovery of Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation, one side believes that the object that "exploded" was created by the accidents of evolution and that the explosion itself was an accident. I don't think that the object that exploded (which had to contain the matter to create every atom in the Universe), was created by accidents!!! It is absurd to claim that accidents created all DNA, all cells, all stars, all galaxies, etc. But these claims will never go away because the atheists and evolutionists will always be looking for converts. But the truth is that the claims of the atheists are complete scientific nonsense. The prophets, past and present, are absolutely correct: God is the source of all DNA, cells, galaxies, etc.
Additional Section For Latter-Day Saints (With Many Additional Articles)!!!
The LDS Church (i.e. the Mormon church) has created many inspiring videos about the life of Christ and His apostles. The videos are free of course: Before going on with the scientific reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true (and there are many, many reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true), we need to talk about why the theory of evolution even exists!!! All Christians believe the Bible and the Bible talks about Adam and Eve. By claiming that humans descended from apes, Adam and Eve are claimed, by evolution, to not have existed!!!
Here is an article which lists, side-by-side, the teachings of God versus the teachings of the theory of evolution (in this case it is literally the teachings of satan): However, all of us (this includes you), existed as spirits long, long before we were born on this planet. In fact, sometime before Adam and Eve were put on this planet by God (about 4,000 B.C.) we (that includes you and me) were alive, as spirits, and we were at a meeting called the "Grand Council."
This quote implies that spirits cannot die. Not even an atomic bomb blast can kill a spirit because spirits are made from a different kind of matter. It was at the Grand Council that satan (i.e. Lucifer) and his followers were cast out to become the devil and his angels. It was also at this meeting that the prophets, and many others, were chosen to perform their main duties on this planet. At this meeting Jehovah did not promise to save all people (His plan was a plan of free agency), but Lucifer promised to save all people (his plan would have forced all of us to obey him and would have "saved" all people). Lucifer's plan was rejected by Heavenly Father!! In other words, sometime before Adam and Eve were put on this earth there was a WAR IN HEAVEN, which we were at and we had to vote on who the Savior would be!!!! The battle was between the forces of Christ, who would later become the Savior, and the forces of Lucifer, who would very quickly become "the devil." Both men volunteered to be the Savior. Jehovah was chosen and Lucifer rebelled and took countless people with him "down to hell."
Here is an article about this war: This council was INCOMPREHENSIBLY IMPORTANT FOR EACH OF US!!! We would never have a physical body if we did not vote for Jehovah (i.e. Jesus Christ) to be the Savior of the world at this council. Yes, you were there and you voted for Jehovah to be the Savior. Hitler, Stalin, Lenin, Mao Zedong and all of the other mass murders were there and all of them voted for Jehovah (i.e. Christ)!! But this life is a different type of test than the Grand Council. It is as if there are two sequential filters - the grand council filter (which has already happened) and the mortality filter (which is ongoing), though the grand council was far, far more dangerous because those who voted for Lucifer (now called the devil) in the Grand Council will never have a physical body!!! These are now the devil and his angels. We know this council occurred before Adam and Eve were put on this planet (more than 6,000 years ago) because Adam was a key player in the event!!! Adam was essentially the Savior's top General at the Grand Council. So we have existed as spirits far longer than you might think!! But by design we do not remember anything that happened to us before we were born. Because Adam was the main General of the forces of God and Christ, at the Grand Council, Adam is a key enemy of satan!!! And what does the theory of evolution teach?? Evolution teaches that we "evolved" from primates, meaning it teaches that Adam and Eve never existed!! The theory of evolution bypasses Adam and Eve. To claim Adam and Eve have never existed, is one of the primary goals of satan as it was Adam who may have been the person who physically cast satan out of the Grand Council as Adam (i.e. Michael) was and still is the Savior's top general!! The theory of evolution is satan's perfect doctrine because it eliminates the Godhead (Heavenly Father, Christ and the Holy Ghost) and almost as important, the theory of evolution eliminates Adam and Eve from ever existing!!! The theory of evolution (satan's perfect doctrine) casts Adam and Eve out of even existing by claiming we "evolved" from other primates (e.g. Bonobo)!!!
The classic discourse on the origin of God, and the Grand Council, is the "King Follett Discourse" given by Joseph Smith not long before he was martyred. Here is a link to this article:
This article is about the Grand Council, which all of us attended (even before Adam and Eve were put on this planet) and was mentioned in the King Follett Discourse. This is probably the most interesting article on this website: The importance of this council, and the importance of our individual vote, cannot even remotely be comprehended!!!
As Adam was a major player in the Grand Council, Adam is a major enemy of satan. This is an article that provides a lot of detail about why the theory of evolution targets Adam and Eve and why the theory of evolution claims they never existed:
Here is an article on comments by the First Presidency of the LDS church about the Origin of Man: God knew that the theory of evolution was coming in 1859 when Darwin's first book was published. In fact, the Book of Mormon, published in 1830 (29 years before Darwin's first book), predicted the coming forth of the theory of evolution in three different places!! The Book of Mormon (considered as "scripture" by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints or Mormon church) was published in 1830, which was 29 years before Darwin's first book; yet the Book of Mormon predicted the coming forth of the theory of evolution in three different places, as just mentioned. So God was well aware that the theory of evolution was coming, even in 1830!!
While this next article does not directly "deal with" teachers and professors, the warning to people like Richard Dawkins should give even teachers and professors cause to wonder whether they should be teaching their students that there is no God. The warnings come from the Book of Mormon, which was published 29 YEARS before Darwin's First Book:
Here is an article of a key quote by the First Presidency in 1909 about the origin of man:
See also this article about LDS anti-evolution resourses (MANY ADDITIONAL LDS ARTICLES FOR LATTER-DAY SAINTS):
This article, which was mentioned above, is for judges (even Federal and State Supreme Court judges), school board members, principals, teachers, etc. who are responsible for the teaching of the theory of evoultion:
I should also mention that there was a world famous scientist, who was a contemporary of Charles Darwin, who did not in any degree agree with Charles Darwin!!! His name was Louis Agassiz (1807-1873). Here is an article about him:
Let's Talk About Real Human DNABecause the atheists have so many problems to deal with, they say that it took "billions of years" (their favorite phrase!!) to accidentally create a DNA strand and then accidentally sequence that DNA strand (so a baby animal survives). They apparently don't know anything about mathematics!!! There are 43,200,000,000 different ways to sequence a male or female DNA strand. And the vast, vast, vast (insert the word "vast" 2 billion more times) percent of those permutations would not create a living anything. If evolution were true, our entire Universe (and many, many trillions of other Universes) would be full of dead, mutated, partially created animals and evolution would not have created a single viable living animal, much less a human being!!! The problems with the theory of evolution apply to any species which has both a male and female DNA strand, though their DNA might not be as long as human DNA. But remember, even if the DNA strands were created by accident, the male DNA strand (actually 2 of them) would have to have a viable permutation of nucleotides and so would the female's. By the way, human DNA is nowhere near the longest DNA strand. Some DNA is more than 40 times longer than human DNA!! But human DNA is the most sophisticated DNA because human DNA is able to create the human brain. Remember, there are several million "species" of plants, animals and insects which have or currently exist on this planet, each with unique and highly sophisticated DNA. And many of these species have both a male and female (e.g. Bonobos) which have three DNA strands, like humans, which need to align in a very precise way!! No team of humans on this planet understand the DNA of an ant, much less human DNA. In fact, if you added every type of DNA strand on this earth (e.g. male human DNA, male mouse DNA, male horse DNA, ..., female human DNA, female mouse DNA, female horse DNA, ...), the length of this DNA strand would be about one quadrillion (1015) nucleotides long!! So if one DNA strand (for each species, male and female where applicable) were laid end-to-end, there would be 41,000,000,000,000,000 different ways to sequence all of the different types of DNA strands on this planet. Obviously only a tiny, tiny, tiny fraction of these would yield every type of animal, plant and insect on this planet. How big is this number?? The number of ATOMS in our Universe is probably less than 41,000 The atheists and evolutionists always counter these facts with the claim that it took "millions of years" for new species to "evolve." The problem is that the DNA permutation issue is so damaging to the theory of evolution that a quadrillion quadrillion quadrillion years of random mutations to DNA COULD NOT CREATE A SINGLE VIABLE DNA STRAND FOR ANY ANIMAL!!!! The atheists and evolutionists just don't understand or comprehend the mathematics of permutations!!! But let's get back to human DNA. Human DNA is the most sophisticated computer program on this planet - by a giant margin!! Human DNA is so sophisticated that scientists still only understand about 2% of human DNA. Yet the atheists and evolutionists want people to believe that DNA and cells and the Universe, etc. were all created by accidents!!! Not a chance!!! So what accident created the Universe according to the atheists? The Big Bang. There probably was a Big Bang, that is not the issue, but the question is whether the Big Bang was an accidental explosion or whether it was a carefully planned and executed explosion under the direction of God!! In fact, God delegated the explosion of the Big Bang and this is discussed elsewhere on this website. On August 21, 2017, several members of my family drove me to Sedalia, Missouri to see a total eclipse of the sun. There is no way that our sun and moon and earth could align, by accident, to create a total eclipse of the sun!! This event is God bragging at His power, majesty and might!!! When we could see the corona of the Sun, we could not see any shadows on the roof where we were located. The entire event was awesome!! After the event I said to one of the ladies who was there that "this was not an accident." She totally agreed with me!! In summary: we exist because of God (per the creation scientists) or accidents (per the atheists and evolutionists). That is the evolution debate in one sentence!!! Pure accidents, as the creative force, is the only option for the atheists and evolutionists!!! Let us bring up another of the many issues related to DNA. How could the alignment of male DNA and female DNA (even at the gene level) have "evolved" (via trial and error from species to new species) because if the alignment was not perfect the first time, in an attempt to create new DNA for a new species (both male and female) from the DNA of an old species (both male and female), there would never have been a viable baby to perpetuate a new species!! We could call this the "first time" problem for atheists and evolutionists. It is a major problem!!! But there is yet another major problem for evolution. The problem is creating a new and impoved species from an "old" or "existing" species. This would require new and improved DNA. There are massive technical problems and mathematical problems in any attempt to change one DNA strand (i.e. one computer program) into a "new and improved" DNA strand (i.e. a new and improved computer program). We can see this with real computer programs. Can you randomly change the object code of one computer program and expect to end up with a new and improved computer program which has new features?? Obviously not!! Now try to change the object code on the far more sophisticated male and female computer programs (i.e. DNA)!! DNA is like object code, but it is vastly more sophisticated than human-designed computer object code. Not only is it STATISTICALLY impossible to change the intelligence on a DNA strand, it is also PHYSICALLY impossible to change a DNA strand (you can only DAMAGE DNA, you cannot change it)!!!! More on that later. It is the intelligence of God versus the intelligence of accidents. God will always win that battle!!
DNA Must Be PerfectThink of the DNA for the several million species on this planet which have or currently exist, as the most sophisticated computer programs on this planet. This is because the most sophisticated computer program ever written by human beings is less sophisticated than the DNA of a cockroach!! While a human designed computer program may be longer than a DNA strand, it is not more sophisticated. In addition, if you had 99% of a complete DNA strand from the male and 97% of a complete DNA strand of the female (during the evolutionary process), this male and female could not have had any children!! Only 100% complete DNA from the male and 100% complete DNA from the female can align with each other and be able to create a viable child!! DNA is "irreducibly complex," meaning every piece and sequence had to work the first time. For example, humans could not have "evolved" piecemeal from a prior species (e.g. a Bonobo), in addition to all of the other problems DNA causes for evolutionists. But there is another factor that is involved in what we will look like when we are born. Before we were born we were a pure spirit in the "pre-existence." This spirit also affects what we look like when we are born. So what we look like when we are born is a combination of what our spirit looks like (and what our spirit looks like does not change over time) combined with one of the DNA strands of our father and one of the DNA strands of our mother. So what we look like is a combination of three things: our spirit and two DNA strands. So ignoring the influence of our spirit, here is the key question: where did these three highly sophisticated DNA strands (two from the father and one from the mother) come from for thousands of animal species?? Anyone with a functional knowledge of permutations and statistics would immediately know that God is the creator of our spirit and He designed the DNA of our father and mother and thus God is behind what we look like and how we function!!! In fact, the biggest problem in the evolution debate is that very few people have the mathematics background to understand the permutation issues relative to several million different species, many of which have both male and female DNA (more will be said about permutations below).
|
|
Creation Science"Creation Science" (a phrase many youth have never heard) is the claim that God lives and that all things, from the Big Bang to the DNA of an ant, had to be carefully planned, designed and executed by God or by others who were chosen and given authority by God. Yes, God designed and executed (or had someone else design and execute) the Big Bang. There may be countless Universes as space is infinite and has no bounds. Let's talk a little about creation science. God is an intelligent force in nature - a very, very, very intelligent force!!! My first college degree was in mathematics, so if I were asked to give my number one reason the theory of evolution cannot be true, I would reply with three words: "permutations of nucleotides." A "permutation" is a unique way of ordering a set of objects, in this case nucleotides. For example, the number of different ways that human male DNA could be sequenced (meaning the number of permutations) is 43,200,000,000!!!! Only a very, very, very, very, very, very, very (insert the word "very" 10,000 more times) minute percent of these permutations would lead to a viable human being!!! By comparison to the number of permutations of human DNA, the number of atoms in our Universe is probably less than 4500!!!! It gets worse for accidents. For humans, there are actually three DNA strands which have 43,200,000,000 permutations - the DNA in the male sperm cells of the father, the DNA in the female sperm cells of the father and the gender-neutral DNA in the mother's ovum (i.e. egg). And all three of these DNA strands (and this is true of all animals) must align with each other in an incomprehensible way!! So they not only have to be the same length, but subsections of the three DNA strands must align with each other!!! To say that this could happen by accident is purely insane!!! When thinking about totally random sequences of nucleotides (if not intelligently sequenced and designed by God), the vast, vast, vast, vast majority of these would not yield a vaible human being or any other animal!!! Consider that the DNA of EVERY ANIMAL on this planet is vastly more sophisticated than any computer program ever written by human beings!!!!! And every animal species has 3 DNA strands just like humans do!!! In fact, if evolution were true, there would be trillions and trillions and trillions and trillions of dead animals (whose DNA was not quite good enough for survival and reproduction) and there still would not be a single living animal, not even a male mouse (much less a male mouse and female mouse). In order to create the several million species of plants, animals, etc. which have or do live on this planet, (i.e. roughly twenty-one million different functional DNA strands) our entire Universe would be full of dead plants and animals and there still would not be a living pair of animals!! Welcome to the beginners guide to the vast, vast power of permutations!!! It is actually worse than I just described. For example, suppose you were to create a single new DNA strand which sequentially and cumulative has the DNA from ALL SPECIES OF ANIMALS, WHICH HAVE TWO MALE AND ONE FEMALE DNA STRANDS, all species of plants, all species of insects, etc. on this planet!!! This DNA strand would have roughly one quadrillion nucleotides!!!!! The permutations of this imaginary DNA strand would have 41,000,000,000,000,000 different ways of being sequenced!!!! Of course the vast, vast, vast (etc.) majority of these permutations would not create the several million species, male and female where applicable, that have lived or currently live on this planet. In fact, I rank the NUMBER ONE REASON THE THEORY CANNOT BE TRUE to be the answer to this question: "Where are the Failures of Evolution?" If evolution, were true, because of the permutation issues, there would literally be vastly, vastly, vastly more partially complete animals (whose DNA was not good enough for the animal to be born and grow up to be adults) than there are atoms in a billion billion billion Universes like ours!!!! Are you BEGINNING to grasp the significance of the sophistication of the massive numbers of unique DNA strands on this earth and the absurdity of claiming that accidents could have created any of them, much less all of them?? Let's talk more about the alignment of nucleotides issue.
Alignment of DNA IssuesSuppose you were given the task to write a massively complex computer program. But you were told to fulfill this assignment by doing the following:
Step 1) Using source code, write two MASSIVELY COMPLEX computer programs which are the same length after being compiled (i.e. the object code). Good luck. But that is precisely the way that nature creates the DNA for a baby from the DNA of its parents, except that there are three DNA strands. Here is another fact: all of the scientists on this planet could not create a functional cell, with a functional DNA strand inside, from scratch (from raw elements on the Periodic Table)!! Also, this cell must be able to divide into two cells, each of which has a DNA strand. This means that during cell division, a copy of the DNA is made. Try to figure out how that is done. But even if DNA strands could be created by humans, they could not intelligently sequence the nucleotides such that an animal could be created by millions or billions of trillions of cell divisions!!! Here is a test of the integrity of those in the scientific community. If scientists claim that they can create two different DNA strands in a male (the DNA in the male sperm cell leads to a male baby and the DNA in the female sperm cell leads to a female baby) and the one DNA strand in a female (which is gender-neutral), then ask them to create the DNA and cells for an extinct species, such as the Woolly Mammoth, Dodo Bird or Mastodon!! But there is another massive, massive issue. Scientists CANNOT CHANGE the DNA of one species, in thousands of different places, to create new DNA for a "new and improved" species!! This is the very foundation of the theory of evolution!!!!!!!!!!! The entire foundation of the theory of evolution is the claim that one animal can "evolve" into a new and improved species!!!! But this means that the entire foundation of the theory of evolution is that the DNA of one species can be randomly changed into the DNA of a new species!!! This claim is both physically and statistically impossible!!!!
Common AncestorsThe concept of "common ancestor" is totally based on the belief that DNA can be changed!!! For example, it is thought by many that humans have a "common ancestor" with chimpanzees (AKA: "Chimpanzee - Human Last Common Ancestor" or CHLCA) because some segments of DNA of chimpanzees and humans are very similar. Thus, the reality is that humans and chimpanzees have a "common designer!!! When God designed the DNA for humans and chimpanzees He simply used DNA that he had already designed. I don't know whether He designed humans first or chimpanzees first. This method is common, for example, with those who design automobiles as they would occasionally use common parts from an old model car in the new model car. This saves money for the automobile manufacturer. Or there could be other reasons God (or some of His children he assigned the task) used "common parts" on DNA. The point is that the fact that DNA cannot be changed is VERY IMPORTANT when thinking about the claims of the atheists and evolutionists. This is just an example of how the atheists and evolutionists assume evolution is true.
A Little About CellsMany scientists have PhD degrees in "Cell Biology"!! Cells are not simple!! So how could a PhD in Cell Biology think for one instant that cells, and what goes on inside of cells, was created purely by accidents!!!
Here is article with videos about the sophistication of cells - very interesting stuff: This is what bothers me: why do "scientists" (as they call themselves) assume, for one instant, that the DNA of an ant could be created and intelligently sequenced by nothing but accidents?? Do these people ever think for themselves?? Actually "no." What these people think about is recognition and popularity. On this planet, "truth" is about number 1,000 on their priority list (i.e. at the bottom of their priorities). Popularity, money and other things are in the top ten!!! Nobody has the guts to rock the boat. I am a retired cancer researcher so I couldn't care less about being popular.
Here is the bottom line: the scientific evidence is overwhelming that accidents have not created a single cell or a single DNA strand!! Nor have accidents intelligently sequenced the nucleotides on any DNA strand!! The entire foundation of the theory of evolution is scientific nonsense!! Here is my article on Cell Biology and Microbiology: Trust me: God is alive and well and He is a heck of a lot smarter than any of us!!
Can New DNA Be Created From Scratch??There are two categories if someone claimed that "evolution" (i.e. accidents) created a new species. First, the claim that new species (i.e. their DNA) are created from scratch, with their own new DNA, or second, the claim that new species, with new DNA, have DNA which was created by a modification to the DNA of a previously existing species. In this section, let's talk about the creation of new DNA from scratch. In order for "evolution" (i.e. "accidents") to create a new species, with brand new DNA, the new species must be created by nothing but accidents, with no intelligence whatsoever involved. Is this logical? Absolutely not!! Since all animal species begin as a single fertilized egg, with DNA inside of the egg which controls cell divisions, evolution has no choice except to work at the DNA level!!! It is DNA that creates an animal, not the other way around!! All of the scientists in the world, combined, could not create a new DNA strand from scratch, but even if they could they would have absolutely no ability to order/intelligently sequence the nucleotides on the new DNA!! If evolution were true, and accidents could create massively sophisticated computer programs (like DNA), we could fire all computer programmers and use random number generators to simulate evolution in order to write new computer programs and to enhance old computer programs into new and improved computer programs which have new features!! This is absurd as any computer programmer knows, yet this is precisely the claim of the atheists and evolutionists!!! Evolution is essentially a random number generator applied to more than a million unique DNA strands for more than a million unique species, many of which have both male and female DNA which must align in an incredibly sophisticated way!! And the DNA of each and every animal, plant and insect on this planet is massively most sophisticated than any human-designed computer program on this planet!!!
More On The Male and Female Issues Related To Creating New DNA From Old DNA??As a specific example of the claim that new DNA can be created from old/existing DNA, let us assume that evolutionists claimed that human DNA "evolved" directly from the DNA of Bonobos. What their actual claims are is not relevant to this discussion, the issue is whether the DNA of one species (e.g. Bonobos) can be MODIFIED to create the DNA for a slightly superior species or a massively superior species. We will not cover the situation where a species which does not have a male and female can "evolve" into a species which has both a male and female (which is itself a major issue with evolution), rather we will discuss the "evolution" of a species with both a male and female into a superior species which has both a male and female. In order for evolution (i.e. accidents) to create the DNA for a new species, by randomly modifying the DNA of an existing species (which has both a male and female), the accidental changes to the (old) male DNA and the (old) female DNA (as required by the theory of evolution) must be in the same sections of their DNA and the changes must happen in the same generation!! All of the changes to the DNA do not have to occur in the same generation, but each SUBSET of changes must occur in the same locations and same generation. For example, there could be 50 changes to the male and female in each of 10 consecutive generations (for a total of 500 changes to the male and female). But each subset of 50 changes in each generation must include the same 50 changes. As an example, the same new genes (male and female) must be in the same sections of their respective DNA so that their offspring (the new species) will have the new section(s) of their DNA from both their mother and father!! This is part of the alignment issues required by evolution. But not only must the genes and other sections of DNA align between the male and female (as evolution is making changes to the DNA of both the male and female at the same time so the male DNA and female DNA will align with each other at all times), the morphing of the embryo algorithms sections on the DNA of the male and female (Note: this is my terminology for the sections of DNA which control the cell divisions of the baby) must also align because it is the morphing of the embryo algorithms that control the 30 trillion cell divisions (in the case of humans) as the new baby is being made!! By using the term "align" I do not mean that they have the same nucleotides. What I mean is that the FUNCTION of each section must align. For example, the sections of the DNA that contain the gene(s) for eye color, for a male and female, must align, but the eye color of the male and the eye color of the female do not have to be the same. The alignment of the morphing of the embryo algorithms alone represents an issue so devastating to the theory of evolution that it would destroy the theory of evolution by itself!! For example, with human DNA, and the DNA of many other species, there are two gigantic computer programs (male DNA and female DNA) which are each massively more sophisticated than any human-designed computer program!!! How do these two computer programs align before, during and after the transition from an "old" species to a "new and improved" species?? To make a human baby, these two biological computer programs on two DNA strands (male and female) must align with each other so their offspring have features of both parents. Try doing that with the object code of two different computer programs!! There is no way that the morphing of the embryo algorithms, on the father's DNA and the mother's DNA, would align with each other after a massive series of accidents (i.e. as "evolution" is trying to improve the DNA to make a new species)!! In addition, these changes must occur in the same timeframe and same location on this earth or the male and female would not find each other and mate after the massive number of accidents (i.e. evolution) were finished. Well, the claim that DNA is controlling the cell divisions is not exactly correct. There are no "morphing of the embryo" algorithms on DNA, there is something else that is controlling the morphing of the baby from a single fertilized egg into a baby. I talked about this above in the Sixteen Cells Mystery article.
|
|
Detailed Articles On Specific Topics
Where Did God Come From??
If "evolution" cannot be true (for hundreds of reasons), then God must live. So it is common for someone to ask: "Where did God come from?" There is an article to answer that question. Most of this article uses quotes from the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints - the Mormons - and includes quotes on the nature of God:
Join The Fight: Please Share This Website With Others!!Please share this amazing website with 15 or 20 of your friends on social media (e.g. Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, Pinterest, etc.) and ask your friends to share this site with 15 or 20 of their friends on social media!! Also, please link to this website from your website!! JOIN THE FIGHT!!!!! Until a few dozen people do these things this website might as well be classified as military-grade Top Secret because Google will rank this website very, very low on the totem pole!!
|
A Brief Introduction To CellsDNA resides inside of cells. In fact, the DNA is critical for the cell. Hundreds of scientists have PhD degrees in cell biology so cells are not simple!! Here is a quote by Michael Denton about cells:
An "irreducibly complex system," is by definition, a sequence of complex chemical reactions, such that if any one of the chemical reactions was not there, or failed, the end result of the chemical reaction will fail and the entire cell may be at risk!!! I would assume that most of these chemical reactions are used to create ATP molecules in the cell. ATP is a key molecule inside every cell. In fact, when something blocks ATP energy, and the cell has low ATP energy, the cell is DEFINED to be cancerous!! Michael Denton did not say there was one such sequence of chemical chain reactions in cells, but "tens of thousands" of such systems!!! This is significant because it is one of the many reasons that "evolution" cannot create a cell from scratch!! In other words, all of the chemical chain reactions must be functional at the time the cell is first created because if one or more systems of chemical chain reactions is not there from the beginning, the new cell may not survive!!! Accidents could never create a living cell by accidents!! In other words, an irreducibly complex chemical chain reaction cannot "evolve" into existence by adding one chemical reaction at a time because each and every chemical chain reaction must be fully functional before the chemical reaction can achieve any benefit to the cell!!
The Magnitude Of The Problems With The Theory Of EvolutionThe above items, and more to come, are just a few of the hundreds of scientific reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true which are discussed on this website. But I should emphasize that the MAGNITUDE of the reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true is simply beyond comprehension. The permutation issues of the DNA for several million species, many with both a male and female, alone would eliminate any chance that the theory of evolution is true. And the construction of DNA is another issue of such magnitude that the theory of evolution simply cannot be true. Do not look at each reason the theory of evolution cannot be true as being equal with the other reasons. Some reasons are massive enough, by themselves, to make the theory of evolution completely ludicrous!!! Now I want to make it very clear that many students have been fooled by the atheists and evolutionists. This is nothing to be ashamed of. The atheists have perfected the art of deception, they are well-organized, very well-funded and their deceptions are highly polished!!! Atheists don't want a God to exist because a God would be massively smarter than they are. So most of them do everything in their vivid imaginations to pretend there is no God and to claim that everything in the Universe came to exist by pure chance. God is replaced by mindless accidents.
What Should A Student Do??So what should a student do when they realize the theory of evolution is complete scientific nonsense (and I am just beginning)? It is definitely not advisable for a student to argue with their teacher, but there is nothing wrong with a student quietly going "online" and learning the truth about the absurdity of the theory of evolution because of the sophistication of DNA and the sophistication of the cells that the DNA resides inside of, among many other reasons (e.g. the physical constants and the Universe). This website shows no mercy for the theory of evolution. Why should it? The theory of evolution is pure science fiction!! In fact, this website discusses hundreds of reasons that the theory of evolution cannot be true, meaning hundreds of reasons that accidents could not have created everything in the Universe, including what is on this earth that is not man-made!! I can assure you that God is not pleased with people who teach that He does not exist!!! God loves His children (that includes you and me). But as our Father, God wants His children to know the truth. And just as importantly, God is a very forgiving God.
Evolution After The "First Living Cell"
Life on this earth had to start with a single cell. So let us first talk about the credibility of the "first living cell" theory as claimed by the atheists and evolutionists: Evolutionists claim that the DNA of the first human male and the DNA of the first human female "evolved" independently over millions of years, from the same "first living cell," by a series of accidents called "evolution"!!! How did the DNA of the first human father and the DNA of the first human mother "evolve" together from the "first living cell?" How was their DNA synchronized, species after slightly improved species, as the DNA of the males and females evolved independently for millions of years?? Here is the problem, suppose the male DNA evolved slightly faster than the female DNA evolved. Within many thousands of years of new species, their DNA would not align and they would not have been able to have any children that survived because their DNA was not compatible!! Male DNA and female DNA had to be designed by God, for each species with a male and female!! Evolution could never have designed two massively sophisticated computer programs (DNA) that could be integrated together to create a third computer program (a baby). And evolution certainly could not have done it in the same time-frame and same locations on the earth. Yet the atheists claim that evolution created male and female DNA for many species that have both a male and female. They must claim the male and female DNA "evolved" over the same time period (so they could mate as they slowly evolved over many generations) and they had to live in the same geographical area (also required so they could mate). The evolution debate is not about science, it is about God. If you assume God does not exist, or if you believe God does not exist, you will likely believe in the theory of evolution no matter how absurd it is. Unfortunately, many people who believed in God have been tricked into believing in evolution. In fact, that is the precise purpose of the highly sophisticated deceptions of the atheists and evolutionists (and I have only talked about a few of their deceptions) and why it is taught in most schools, but not all schools. In some schools, "creation science" or "intelligent design" is taught and in other schools there are disclaimers about evolution. Biology is no longer about science, it is about creative thinking as to how every discovery can be attributed to the theory of evolution in order to get more converts to atheism. Atheists are not interested in truth, they are only interested in getting converts to atheism. One of the key deceptions of the atheists and evolutionists, to get converts, is their definition of the term "species." They define the term "species" in such a way that each "variety" of dog is a different "species." To them a Chihuahua and a Great Dane are different "species." This gives them the latitude to claim that they have observed a new "species" form. But if the term "unique species" is defined to be a "unique DNA structure" then they have never seen a new "species" be created. Nor will they ever see a new species be created by accident or by human breeding of animals. The atheists and evolutionists don't like to talk about DNA, they like to tell stories and use deception, such as by using very clever deceptive definitions. Seven chapters in one of the free eBooks on this website are devoted to deceptive definitions. In addition, the atheists must claim the entire Universe was created by accident!! How could the atheists and evolutionists claim that the entire Universe was created by accident instead of by God? Well, they had to come up with some "accident" that they claimed could create the Universe, including the superclusters of clusters of galaxies. So the atheists invented the concept of a purely accidental "Big Bang." They want you to believe that an accidental explosion (remember, it had to be an accident) created the Universe. I don't think so. The object that exploded had to contain all of the atoms in the Universe!!! Only God could have pulled that off!!!
The Current Evolution Versus Creation Science DebateThe evolution debate should not be based on the visual forms of plants and animals (i.e. Darwin's phylogenetic tree), but rather it should be based on the probability that the DNA of the plants and animals (and the cells the DNA resides in) came to exist PURELY BY CHANCE (i.e. by the totally random accidents of evolution)!! But what massively sophisticated computer program, and human DNA is the most sophisticated computer program on this planet, has ever come to exist by a long series of pure accidents? Every DNA strand is claimed to have been created by accident and every computer program has been written by computer programmers (and the compilers were written by humans and the operating systems were written by humans), yet EVERY DNA strand is far more sophisticated than EVERY computer program!! Suppose you were a spy and you were told by your country to steal the instructions of how to manufacture a certain kind of automobile. Would you take a photograph of the automobile or would you steal the schematics of the machines in the factory that made the automobile?? Obviously you would steal the schematics of the machines. Likewise, debating the theory of evolution by looking at the visual forms of plants and animals is not scientific because it totally misses the root cause of why the plants and animals exist, which is DNA!! The fact is that without DNA there would be no plants and no animals. To be more specific, plants and animals are created by the computer algorithms which are on the DNA of the plants and animals. So looking at the visual form of a plant and animal is NOT looking at what causes the plant or animal to exist!! Needless to say the atheists and evolutionists don't like to talk about DNA or cells, they like to talk about the visual form of each plant and animal so they can tell their stories. They carefully ignore the fact that computer programs in the human world are never written by random number generators, but evolution itself is essentially a random number generator applied to DNA!! Without God there is nothing but total randomness in nature. The key question in the evolution debate is this: knowing that the "computer programs" on DNA in nature are vastly more sophisticated than any "human-designed computer program," how could the "computer programs" on DNA, for several million species have been "written" by totally random processes? As will be seen many times on this website, when DNA is looked at during the evolution debate, the theory of evolution becomes scientific nonsense. By definition, there is "no intelligence" in the theory of evolution, especially at the DNA level. The only "evidence" the evolutionists have for their theory is to ignore DNA and look only at the visual form of plants and animals and then combine the visual form of plants and animals with their exceptional story-telling skills. Once DNA enters into the evolution debate the theory of evolution quickly collapses because all DNA is a massively sophisticated computer program, even for an ant.
Cell Biology (The Sophistication of Cells)Suppose you were on a hike deep in the forest and you had not seen any sign of civilization for several hours. Suppose as you came over one hill you saw, what looked like to you, a brand new Buick automobile with its engine running and its headlights on and its hazard lights flashing. Would you think that this "object" was created by an explosion in a forest?? Of course not. A forest is made of dirt, trees, shrubs, rocks, etc. You would know that what you were looking at was vastly too sophisticated to have been created by an explosion in the forest. Yet, every cell in your body is massively more sophisticated than any automobile ever made!! To say that any cell was created by a series of accidents is ludicrous. Yet all plants, animals and insects are made from a collection of cells and each of those cells is more sophisticated than a Buick!! In fact, all of the scientists on this planet could not create a single cell, even without the DNA that is inside of almost all cells. Nor could they create the many other things which are inside the cell that are part of the continuous activities going on inside of almost every cell. Nor could they figure out how to make a cell divide into two cells, including copying the Golgi Apparatus, for example. Hundreds of scientists have PhD degrees in Cell Biology and/or Microbiology, so cells are not simple!! The large textbook Essential Cell Biology, Third Edition, has 8 authors and 730 pages plus many pages of other information!! The Glossary has 596 definitions!!! Cells are clearly not simple!! By the way, the term "species" was not even defined in the book!! The term should be defined thusly: "a unique species is determined by a unique DNA structure." But if the atheists and evolutionists used this definition, the theory of evolution would crumble to the ground. This is precisely what so many atheists tap dance around a definition of "species." Another textbook on Cell Biology is called: The World Of The Cell, Fourth Edition, by Becker, Kleinsmith and Hardin. This textbook is 845 pages. The term "species" does not show up in the Index. I also own a book called The Dictionary of Cell and Molecular Biology by J.M. Lackie. It is 725 pages and the print is small.
There are clearly hundreds of reasons the theory of accidents cannot be true due to the sophistication of cells; and this does not include the many issues created purely by the DNA in almost all cells!! In fact, I own two books on this very issue (these are "creation science" books and I am sure there are other creation science books on this topic): These two men obviously believe that God had to create the many species on this earth because they could not have been created by accidents. Even microorganisms are far more sophisticated than any jet airplane on this planet!!!
What is Life?Let us look at the issue: "what is life?" For example, if you took a fish and left it out of the water until it died, and then an hour later you put it back into the water, why doesn't it come back to life? All of the raw elements for life are still in the fish, so why doesn't it come back to life? There is something more to "life" than just cells and oxygen and water. Furthermore, have the evolutionists and atheists ever proven that life can be created from non-life (i.e. inorganic materials)?? Never, never, never - yet they continue to preach atheism. While several attempts have been made to create life from non-life (e.g. Miller-Uray, Wong and Hartgerink), the scientists have not only failed to create life, they have also failed to prove it can be done. They cannot create a DNA strand from inorganic material, much less a DNA strand with a viable permutation of nucleotides for life which is inside of a cell!! For example, have scientists put a large shell over a pond, which had no life, meaning there was no DNA and no cells (this simulates "prebiotic," meaning "existing before life"), and observed "life" form by a series of accidents, including RNA or DNA inside of a "first living cell" (in that pond), that was alive and had the ability to divide itself into two cells (which would be required for life to continue)? Never!! Then what is their evidence for evolution? Their only evidence is that many scientists do not believe in God and thus they have no choice except to use their God-given brains to deceive people into believing that everything in the Universe, including human DNA, occurred by chance. But the theory of evolution should have been thrown in the trash can when DNA was discovered and when the complexity of cells was also discovered. Yet, as scientists learn more and more about DNA and cells, the atheists continue to cling to the theory of evolution as if it were still 1859, when Darwin's first book was published. The only thing that is "evolving" on this planet is the theory of evolution as evolutionists/atheists constantly need to develop new spin to account for the new discoveries about the sophistication of cells, the morphing of the embryo algorithms on DNA, etc.
Can Accidents Or Simplicity Create Complexity?As one example of complexity, the human eyes are unbelievable in complexity. Yet the sections on human DNA which create the human eyes must be far more complex than the eyes themselves!! And the intelligence who designed the DNA (God) must be far more complex than the DNA itself!! In other words, simplicity never creates complexity. To understand these concepts, consider these items: First, consider that a human-designed computer program exists because of the human intelligence to write the computer program, the human intelligence to write the computer language, the human intelligence to write the computer language compiler, the human intelligence to design and build the microprocessor, including designing and building the memory chips, etc. Second, consider the output of the computer program which is printed on a piece of paper. How can the printout on the piece of paper be more sophisticated than the human intelligence needed to write the computer program, to write the computer language, etc.?? It can't!! Let's think about the memory chips. I have a son who works for a company that makes memory chips. At times he is sitting in a very large room by himself, with more than a billion dollars worth of equipment needed to make memory chips!! The memory chips cannot be more complex than the machines that made them, and the machines that made them cannot be more complex than the humans who designed them!! Simplicity cannot create complexity!! Consider the sophistication of DNA such that it creates a person's brain. Let us think about a pianist. A pianist must be able to convert thousands on dots on a sheet of music into the movements of their fingers!! To do this the DNA must create the nerves between their eyes and their brain, have the brain process these dots and then the brain controls their fingers. And the DNA must create the muscles on their fingers, etc. If all of this is in place, and with thousands of hours of practice, a pianist can play the Rachmaninoff Piano Concerto #3!! What created our DNA, which in turn created our brain, had to be far, far smarter than our DNA and our brain!!! That would be God. Accidents (i.e. evolution) have zero intelligence so how could accidents create something with intelligence? They can't!! Intelligence is a top-down process and someone a lot smarter than humans had to design human DNA and the DNA for every one of the several million species on this planet which have or do exist, many of which have a male and female. Could accidents or monkeys design and build a Buick automobile? Of course not. It takes a lot of intelligence, including many different specialties, to build a Buick automobile. Only humans can build an automobile. Likewise, only God could create the DNA for several million species of plants, animals and insects.
Article: Where Did God Come From?The truth is that God had to exist long before our Universe was created and our sun was created and this planet was prepared for earth life. So people naturally want to know where God came from!! Brigham Young, who was born in 1801 (Darwin was born in 1809), the second prophet of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (the Mormons), said this about the first cause of all things (i.e. where God came from):
In other words, there was a "First Cause" of all things - a beginning - but this beginning happened so long ago, and so many quadrillions of things have happened since then, that these events are far, far beyond human comprehension. By the way, the largest desert on this planet is 5.5 MILLION SQUARE MILES in size (the Antarctica Polar Desert)!! The Arctic Polar Desert is 5.4 MILLION SQUARE MILES in size!! There are a lot of grains of sand on this planet for the ant to count!! If Brigham Young had known these two facts, and other facts about deserts, I doubt he would have changed his statement.
While Brigham Young did not know very much about the Universe in his day, he did understand the principle that the "first cause of all things" is beyond human comprehension. Brigham Young also said this about God:
This article is specifically about where God and the Universe came from:
Here is an article on astronomy (this is a new article and will be expanded as time goes on):
A Summary and Overview Of Some Key IssuesSo far we have barely touched the surface of the reasons evolution cannot be true, yet even at this point we have no logical choice except to conclude that God exists. Different religions may have different beliefs about God, but there is no choice except to say that God does exist. In the Mormon religion (the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints) there are three separate Gods in the Godhead. The head God (Heavenly Father), the Savior (Jesus Christ) and the Holy Ghost. If scientists are so smart, and believe that God does not exist, can they create a Universe with a planet like Earth that has or had several million species, many of which have both a male and female? Let's think about it. What is the difference between "creating" a brand new Buick versus "destroying" a brand new Buick by driving it over a cliff?? The difference is that the new Buick being driven off the cliff must have been created before it was driven over a cliff. How does driving a Buick over a cliff help explain how the Buick got created in the first place?? It doesn't. So how does finding the remains of an extinct animal (i.e. its fossil) tell us how it was created?? It doesn't. All it tells us is that this animal used to be alive, but now it is dead. An animal must be alive before it is dead. A fossil does not tell us how an animal was created, it only tells us that the animal is dead. But even extinct animals had to have DNA and their DNA had to create them either from an enclosed egg (e.g. a chicken egg) or a fertilized egg (e.g. humans or monkeys). Every animal on this planet, including humans, came from a single DNA strand which was inside of an egg. Whether they came from an enclosed egg (i.e. a chicken egg) or a single fertilized egg in a mother, the animal (including humans) came from a single object and then morphed over time into what it was when it was young and eventually died. So the evolution debate is not about where bones came from, it is about where DNA came from!!! In other words, when you see fossils, think about the DNA that created these animals!! How did the "morphing of the embryo" algorithms come to exist for many, many complex species, especially when there is a male and female in the species?
Well, we now know that it is not the DNA that is controlling the morphing of the embryo (i.e. cell divisions), it is the spirit of the person or animal that is controlling the morphing of the embryo and the DNA is a database for the spirit. See this article on the "Sixteen Cells Mystery": There are so many past and present highly sophisticated DNA strands for both extinct and living animals that the theory of evolution has become ludicrous. But it is not just about the creation of DNA, it is also about viable permutations of nucleotides on DNA. Even if DNA could be built, the probability it has a viable permutation to create an animal from a single cell is mathematically insane. It is far beyond the scope of this home page to talk about many subjects. But trust me: the probability of a viable permutation of nucleotides, to create both a male and female for a single advanced species (the permutation of nucleotides on the DNA would have to be almost perfect in order to perform the morphing of the embryo for both a male and female offspring), etc. is so ludicrous it could not happen a single time in the estimated age of this Universe or a billion consecutive Universes.
In summary, here are just a few reasons evolution (i.e. accidents) could never have created human beings: But even if scientists could create a cell from scratch, would their "new cell" be alive? The answer is 'no' because scientists don't have a clue what "life" really is. So how did evolution create a living cell, with DNA or RNA inside, with a viable permutation, with the mechanisms to use the DNA patterns, by pure accident?? Accidents don't create intelligence, just ask any computer programmer how long it would take to write a complex computer program using code written exclusively by random number generators. It would never happen. So if humans cannot design and create from scratch DNA or RNA, plus a cell for the DNA or RNA to exist inside, and give their new cell "life," with a viable permutation of nucleotides, why would anyone believe that a series of pure accidents (i.e. evolution) could have created the "first living cell" in a sterile pond? Because that is what they hear in school and on YouTube. The atheists and evolutionists are great story tellers but they are complete dolts at common sense and logic!!! Popularity and money outranks their brains. Many reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true are mentioned in various other articles on this website, such as the "Twenty-Five Reasons The Theory of Evolution Cannot Be True" article.
The Evolution DebateWhile there are more than 350 books which are favorable to the theory of evolution there are also more than 350 books which are strongly critical of the theory of evolution!! There are also many YouTube videos on both sides of the debate. Those who are critical of the theory of evolution are called "creation scientists" or "creationists" because they believe the scientific data favors a "Creator" of the Universe. In fact, if you want to get published in a leading biology journal you better be an atheist and your article better support the theory of evolution. If it does not praise evolution your article will end up in the trash can, not in a "science" journal. From the incomprehensible sophistication of DNA, to the amazing complexity of cells, to the earth we live on, to the ends of the Milky Way Galaxy, to the furthest galaxy cluster and supercluster (by the way, the supercluster we live in is called the Laniakea Supercluster), and considering the "constants" in physics (e.g. the gravitational constant); the credibility of the theory of evolution has dropped to ABSOLUTE ZERO!!!
Note: In order to prevent this home page from becoming massively too big, some topics, which would normally be put on the home page, have been moved to their own article.
|
|
More Detailed Articles On Special Topics
Article: Five Reasons The Theory of Evolution Cannot Be True
Please ignore this article, it exists solely for search engines, but it must be linked to somewhere:
Article: Fifteen Reasons The Theory of Evolution Cannot Be True
While there are hundreds of reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true, this article is a list of fifteen of the best reasons evolution cannot be true plus this article digs much deeper into the DNA issues which destroy the theory of evolution:
Article: Twenty Reasons Evolution Cannot Be True
This article was written at a different time than the "Fifteen Reasons" artcle so it has a little overlap, but is generally different.
Article: Twenty-Five Reasons Evolution Cannot Be True
This article was written independently from the Fifteen Reasons and Twenty Reasons articles so it is a significantly different list.
Article: More Than Four-Hundred Reasons Why The Theory of Evolution Cannot Be True
Here is a list of more than 400 reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true. In each category one or more items are flagged that represent a significant reason evolution could not have happened by a series of accidents.
Article: Unlimited Reasons Evolution Cannot Be TrueThe number of reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true, which are discused in this article, will probably grow as time goes on, so this article does not have a specific number of reasons evolution cannot be true in its title. But right now it has far less than 400 reasons. But it does have some of the newer reasons.
In other words, this article will change from time to time as I come up with new and improved reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true. So it has a generic title. But this is an important article that will frequently have some of the best reasons evolution cannot be true.
Article: Kehr's Paradox #1 and Kehr's Paradox #2
Before looking at the two Kehr's Paradoxes, if you haven't already seen this article (which is actually a chapter in one of the free eBooks on this website) look at it now:
Both of Kehr's paradoxes demonstrate that if the nucleotides on any DNA strand were randomly chosen (as evolution requires), there is no way that real DNA could be the way that it is!! See this article which discuss these paradoxes:
Article: Can Accidents Create New DNA For A New Species From The DNA Of An Existing Species??
This is one of the premiere articles on this website. It is one of the articles on why the DNA of one species cannot be changed into the DNA of a new and improved species, which is the very foundation of the theory of evolution after the discovery of DNA in 1953!!!
Article: The Sixteen Cells MysteryWhile this issue is mentioned elsewhere on this website, it is so important it needs to be on the home page. Hold on to your seatbelt, it is not just the computer programs on the DNA that control the "morphing of the embryo" that are incomprehensible, it is the way that the morphing algorithms work!! There is no computer program on this planet that could be designed to work the way the "morphing of the embryo" algorithms work.
Here is an article that traces the "morphing of the embryo" until there are 16 cells in the fetus. This article demonstrates that DNA should not even be called a computer program. In this article you will learn why no team of computer programmers on earth could even begin to replicate the way that DNA works!!!
|
|
The Two Free eBooks On This Website
Chapter Summary: Medium-size eBook (37 pages, pdf file): Patterns of Intelligence - Chapter Summary
If you want a quick, high level overview of the Patterns of Intelligence book, this article has a short summary of each chapter in the 266 page medium-size this book:
Technical Medium-Size eBook: (266 pages, pdf file): Patterns of IntelligenceWhile the large book on this website is the "B-2 Bomber" of anti-evolution books, this book is the "F-22 Raptor" of anti-evolution books. This free book is actually much more current on the issues of the great scientific deceptions which are going on and the mathematical reasons evolution cannot be true. However, it does not go into the depth of the long book on the mathematical reasons evolution cannot be true. Did you know that if you listed all major LDS doctrines (i.e. Latter-Day Saint or Mormon) and then took the opposite of each of these doctrines you would end up with the theory of evolution doctrines!! This book will produce such a detailed list in Chapter 2. In this book you will see one of the main arguments of the large book, called "Patterns of Intelligence." This eBook has some really cool graphs. But there are many things in the medium size book which are not in the large book. For example, chapters 22 and 23 of this book contain an amazing discussion which demonstrates that there is nowhere near enough information on DNA to control the "morphing of the embryo" algorithms!! Either God Himself designed DNA (and we cannot even remotely understand it) or the morphing of the embryo has help from the other side of the veil. There is no other option!!
Here is a link to the medium-sized book in one file. As always, you are welcome to read it online, download it, or print it out:
Here is a link to the individual chapters in the medium-sized book. Each chapter is a file so it is easy to focus on one chapter at a time:
Technical Long eBook: (407 pages, pdf file): Prophets or Evolution - An LDS PerspectiveThis book is the "B-2 Bomber" of anti-evolution books. It demolishes the theory of evolution time after time and takes no enemies. The discovery of DNA has created an avalanche of ways to prove the theory of evolution is scientific nonsense. This free eBook is available in both HTML and PDF formats and both versions can be looked at online or can be downloaded. For example, you can download the PDF version and print it out so you can mark it up. As always, you don't even need to tell me you downloaded it!!
The long eBook is called "Prophets or Evolution - An LDS Perspective," which:
The book in HTML format (by chapter):
A printable version of the entire book (407 pages) is available in pdf format and can be read or downloaded from this link. It can also be printed out:
Chapter of Long Book: "Seven Scientific Reasons ... Evolution Cannot be True"
The complete "Prophets or Evolution" book is over 400 pages. This is a link to one of the key chapters in the main eBook. This chapter is a high level overview of seven of the main scientific reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true. It also mentions seven other reasons evolution cannot be true. Here is a link to this chapter:
Other Anti-Evolution BooksIf you listen to the propaganda of the pro-evolution monopoly you might think that anyone who believes in creation science is a dolt. Nothing could be further from the truth. There are many "creation scientists" (i.e. those who believe God created this Universe) who are brilliant and have no problems seeing through the false science generated by the scientific establishment.In fact, many anti-evolution books have been written by brilliant scientists. This listing of anti-evolution books and DVDs contains only a small sampling of the anti-evolution books which exist in print. In fact, there are more than 200 anti-evolution books. Many of the books were written by PhDs in the sciences. The arguments in these books totally shred the theory of evolution from a scientific standpoint. Some of these books may be out of print and you may have to use a book finder, such as Alibris, to find them.
Here is a link to this appendix:
|
|
About The Author Of The ProphetsOrEvolution.com Website (A Retired Cancer Researcher)My name is R. Webster Kehr. I live in Missouri, near Kansas City and I am an ex-Marine (i.e. U.S. Marine Corps), Viet Nam veteran who was seriously wounded in action. Yes, I have a purple heart and many, many scars. By profession I am a retired world-famous cancer researcher of natural medicine who worked with about thirteen thousand cancer patients before retiring and turning my www.Cancertutor.com website over to a team of fantastic natural medicine cancer researchers!!! Everything you know about cancer and other diseases comes from Big Media (i.e. the major television networks) and Big Pharma (i.e. the pharmaceutical industry). So everything you know about these diseases is designed to make more money for Big Media and Big Pharma. So quite frankly you think you know everthing there is to know about cancer, but in fact you don't know anything truthful about cancer or any other highly profitable disease!!!
For example, did you know that herbalists and homeopaths were CURING CANCER for more than 100 years before DNA was discovered!!! I will bet you did not know that!!! Since most people who come to this home page are not interested in natural medicine, I have an article on natural treatments for:
Here is a link to my main article on cancer, AIDS, erectile dysfunction, etc. on this website:
This is an article on this website which links to four articles on cancer on this website and it links to other articles on the very famous www.CancerTutor.com website which is the main website where the experts who work with cancer patients (one on one) can be contacted.
This link is to an article on another website which has a key article on Alzheimer's Disease: Here is my email address, which is camouflaged to avoid web crawlers.
PLEASE SPREAD THE WORD ABOUT THIS WEBSITE ON SOCIAL MEDIA, ETC.!!!
|
