Welcome To The www.ProphetsOrEvolution.com Website!!

The theory of evoution debate is about one question: is there a God?? The prophets, past and present, claim there is a God!! The atheists and evolutionists claim there is no God and that everything, such as human DNA, came to exist without God!! This home page examines this debate in great detail!!!

I will tell you who wins: the prophets easily win!!!

This website contains two free eBooks and more than three dozen free articles on special topics regarding the theory of evolution debate!! Nothing is sold on this website!!

My name is R. Webster Kehr. I am an ex-Marine, Viet Nam veteran who was seriously wounded in action. Yes, I have a purple heart and a lot of scars. Enemy grenades tend to create a lot of scars!! My professional background is that I am a retired, world-famous cancer researcher of natural medicine who worked with about 13,000 cancer patients. Here are the facts about cancer: cancer was being cured by herbalists (in America) and homeopaths (in Europe) for more than 100 years before the discovery of DNA in 1953!!! These natural cancer treatments still work because DNA damage is not what causes cancer!!!

It has been known since 1890 that cancer was caused by a bacteria, Helicobacter pylori. If you want to know the truth about cancer, and find the experts who work one-on-one with cancer patients using highly effective natural cancer treatments, see a link to my biography article and a link to an article on the truth about cancer at the very bottom of this home page!!! The cancer article talks about information you will never hear in the media because the super-rich own both Big Pharma and Big Media and they have a quid pro quo relationship!!!

As I say many times on this website, G.O,O.G,L.E is a piece of garbage for subject matter expert websites, such as this website, so please, please, please tell your friends on social media that this website exists!!! There is no other website on the Internet like this website!!!

Note: This website contains many articles and chapters of books. Links to articles or to chapters of books on this website, or links to other websites, are typically in bold bright blue and when the link is clicked the new article or chapter will usually open in a new window so you won't lose your place.


Introduction To The Theory of Evolution Debate

The average young person today goes to church on the weekends and is told there is a God, but during the week in school they may be taught that the theory of evolution is true and there is no God. Their school teachers may imply that all scientists are evolutionists.

However, the theory of evolution is NOT universally accepted by all scientists!! While there are hundreds of books which have been written to push the theory of evolution, there are also hundreds of books which have been written against the theory of evolution!! Two of the anti-evolution books (i.e. "creation science" books) are free and are on this website.

So what is the "theory of evolution"?? The theory of evolution is the claim that God does not exist and that "evolution" created all things. That is the theory of evolution in a nutshell!!!

However, there is a very serious problem with the theory of evolution. "Evolution" is NOT a tangible object in nature or physics, much less an intelligent tangible object in nature or physics which can design, create and sequence DNA and build cells for the DNA!!! "Evolution" is nothing more than a claim or belief that there is no God!!!

Theories and beliefs, particularly beliefs that claim something does not exist (i.e. the proponents of evolution claim that God does not exist) cannot create tangible things such as DNA or cells!!! Only tangible things can create other tangible things!!!

Let me repeat that: only tangible things can create other tangible things!!!

But "evolution" is not a tangible object, meaning it is not a physical object. Nor is it a force in nature that can change things. Evolution is nothing more than an abstract claim or belief in the minds of some people that there is no God!! That's it!!! Evolution itself is not a physical object or a force or a process (a "process" is a sequence of multiple forces) that can do physical things such as create and sequence the three types of DNA strands which are needed for every animal species!!

For example, "evolution" has no arms to create DNA, it has no legs to travel, and evolution has no brain to design and intelligently sequence the nucleotides on any DNA strand. Evolution could not have created a single cell or a single DNA strand, much less the DNA and cells for about one million living species of animals, all of which have both males and females whose respective DNA strands must align in an incredibly precise way!!!

By the way, there are more than 200 different types of cells just in the human body!!! If there was only one type of cell in the human body we would either be blind or invisible. Now you know one of the reasons why there are so many PhDs in Cell Biology. These are smart people.

How can I make this any more clear!!!!!! Superman, the tooth fairy, the flying spaghetti monster, the theory of evolution , Mickey Mouse, etc. are not tangible objects that can create tangible things!!!

Do you really think that Superman and the flying spaghetti monster flew around the Universe and created the physical constants in physics??? Here is an amazing 11 page document from M.I.T. regarding the "Fundamental Physical Constants" and "Energy Equivalents":
M.I.T. Website: Fundamental Physical Constants

Do you really think that all of these incredibly precise physical constants came to exist by Superman and/or the flying spaghetti monster?? Not a chance!!! The proponents of evolution and the flying spaghetti monster can mock a belief in God all they want, but their fantasy cannot create a single cell or DNA strand, much less a Universe.

So if there is no God (as claimed by the atheists and evolutionists) and if "evolution" is nothing but another Superman, then what would be the force in nature that created human DNA and the DNA for all other species??

The atheists and evolutionists have no choice except to claim that the Universe, physical constants, cells, DNA, etc. were all created by UNINTENTIONAL, MINDLESS, DIRECTIONLESS, PURPOSELESS ACCIDENTS!!!

But "accidents" are like a very mad bull in a china shop - nothing useful can be created by a very mad bull in a china shop!!

That is why the atheists and evolutionists will never use the term "accidents," they will always pretend that evolution has a brilliant mind and created the forces in physics and nature!!! But evolution doesn't exist and accidents always do far, far more harm than good!!

The key is that the imaginary theory of evolution, plus the imaginary flying spaghetti monster plus blind, deaf and dumb accidents do not have any intelligence and they cannot be the source of human DNA or the DNA of any other species!!!

Every DNA strand which is used to create any animal species is vastly, vastly, vastly more sophisticated than any computer program ever written by human beings!!! There is not a single DNA strand on this earth that is completely understood by scientists!!! As I explain below, DNA has almost nothing to do with controlling cell divisions to create a baby animal from a single fertilized ovum/egg!! Wait until you hear the facts about what DNA is really used for!!

Yes, God is alive and well!!! The well-known and highly respected creation scientist Kent Hovind said it this way: "The atheists can't find God for the same reason a thief can't find a policeman."

That quote hits the nail on the head!!! The atheists/evolutionists don't want to find God because of pride!!! Pride is the underlying, undergirding, driving force of the theory of evolution, it is certainly not science!!!!

Superman and evolution are fantasies and accidents have the I.Q. of a rock and none of these things has a brain or eyes or hands!!!

To make matters worse for the atheists/evolutionists I should note that in addition to the one million animal species currently on this planet, there have been approximately nine million animal species, each with three highly sophisticated DNA strands, which are now extinct!!!

And each of the ten million animal species (nine million of which are extinct) needs or needed three DNA strands - two types in each of the father's sperm cells (to determine the sex of the baby - male or female) and one gender-neutral type in each of the mother's ovum. And these three DNA strands for each animal species need to align with each other in an incredibly precise way!!! A monkey would have just as much success as a human in designing their own DNA!!!

The more you learn, the worse the theory of evolution (i.e. the theory of accidents) becomes!!!


More About DNA And Evolution

All of the scientists on this planet combined have not decoded the entire DNA strand of any living or extinct animal, plant, insect, etc.!!! And they never will until they understand what DNA is used for - a database for the spirit!!! I prove this in the "Sixteen Cells" article linked to below.

That is the main reason that scientists have never decoded any DNA strand. While some DNA has been extracted from extinct animals, that is just more DNA that scientists don't understand!!

The only thing scientists can do, for example, is find dead Woolly Mammoths (which they have done) and look inside their cells (which they have done) and hope to get enough DNA to recreate/restore the Woolly Mammoth. The last I have heard they still have not restored the four DNA strands needed to recreate this species from scratch - you will understand why I say it takes four DNA strands to recreate an extinct species in a moment).

But even if and when they do restore four DNA strands to create a living male and female Woolly Mammoth (as an example), and I hope they do, they still have two problems:
First, a spirit is needed to create life, and
Second, the spirit is actually what controls cell divisions. DNA is a database of information the spirit uses to create the baby. All of this is explained in the Sixteen Cells Mystery article which is linked to below. And a spirit can only come from God!!!

To recreate the Woolly Mammoth, or any other extinct animal, God has to cooperate by providing the spirits of dead Woolly Mammoths to restore the Woolly Mammoth (or any other extinct species). I suspect, after the Second Coming of Christ, when only righteous and honorable people will be on this planet (the wicked will be kicked off of this planet at the Second Coming), that God will restore many, if not all, extinct species to add variety to this planet. Wow, how cool that will be!!!

I also suspect, because of the very high spiritual environment after the Second Coming; that all species, even the Woolly Mammoth, will be brought back to life and they will be as gentle as a baby puppy.

As far as DNA is concerned, does it make sense to claim that accidents created the most sophisticated computer programs on earth - the DNA for one million living species of animals PLUS the nine million extinct species of animals???

Yet not a single DNA strand, not even for the one million living animal species, is completely understood by any team of scientists!!!

Don't get me wrong, scientists are very, very smart people, but God is on a whole different level plus scientists don't now anything about spirits and how DNA is a database of information (well, DNA may have other types of information on it as well)!!! Spirits are also what create "life" for the animal or plant, etc.

Understand this: the sequence of nucleotides on every animal DNA strand on this planet, all of which were "written" purely by accidents if evolution is true, is vastly more sophisticated than any computer program ever written by human beings!!! It is pure nonsense to claim that any of these DNA strands was written by nothing but accidents!!! DNA, by itself, is as dead as a rope without a spirit.

In addition, not only do scientists not know how to sequence DNA (without extracting actual DNA from cells), they have never created life from non-life, not even for a single cell, much less for an extinct animal species!!! You will never see a Woolly Mammoth walking around in a zoo unless God cooperates and gives it a spirit (which gives it life)!!!

Regarding DNA, it is absurd to claim that every computer program on this planet was written by one or more highly trained computer programmers (as was the operating system of the computer and the computer language compilers), but every DNA strand on this planet (every one of which is far more sophisticated than any computer program) was created purely by a series of accidents!!!

Getting back to the key point of this introduction; "evolution" is not a tangible object and "accidents" always make things worse, not better!!! We have no choice except to conclude that God is alive and well and "evolution" is nothing but a Superman fantasy and that "accidents" have no brains and no purpose and no direction and accidents always cause more harm than good!!!

We can therefore conclude that the theory of evolution has never created anything and is therefore false!!! Q.E.D. (i.e. "as was to be demonstrated")

The I.Q. of imaginary evolution is ZERO (because "evolution" has the same I.Q. as Superman)!!!
The I.Q. of brainless accidents is ZERO (because "accidents" have the same I.Q. as a rock, which has no intelligence or goals or even a desire to be alive plus rocks always do more damage than provide benefits)!!!

And neither of these things can provide a spirit (i.e. life) without God's cooperation. And a spirit is absolutely required for life!!! I will talk more about the absolute need for every animal to have a "spirit" in The Sixteen Cells Mystery article which is linked to below.

ZERO intelligence for the imaginary evolution plus
ZERO intelligence for accidents equals
ZERO life on this planet!!!

One way the atheists/evolutionists get "evidence" for evolution is to use clever definitions. For example, they misuse the terms "natural selection," "species," "microevolution" and "macroevolution. See this article on their clever definitions (remember, links to more detailed articles are in blue):
Article: Clever And Deceptive Definitions Used By Atheists/Evolutionists ...

Humans should not exist!! Yes, God is alive and well and we are descended from Adam and Eve, not some slime in a pond!!!


What Does God Think About Some Of The Proponents Of The Theory Of Evolution??

Most of the people who believe in the theory of evolution are not stupid, they have just never heard the "creationist" side of the debate from a creationist!!!

But let's talk about God. How would you (if you were God) like it if someone said that you never existed?? Well, God has to deal with that very issue every day!!!

God is well aware of the theory of evolution because it is a major tool to draw people away from Him. So you would think that the scriptures would mention "evolution!!" Well, the term "evolution" did not exist until 1859 which was about two thousand years after the last authors of the Bible lived and about 1,600 years after the last authors of the Book of Mormon lived!!!

Nevertheless, there are three places in the Book of Mormon which reference the theory of evolution without using the term "evolution" which did not exist when the scriptures were orginally written or even when the Book Of Mormon was first translated and published in 1830.

The Book of Mormon is not about the events in 1830, most of the Book of Mormon is about events that happened before the birth of Christ until more than 400 years after the birth of Christ. The Book of Ether talked about a now extinct group of people. In fact, the Nephites also went extinct so two of the three groups of people the Book of Mormon talks about have been extinct for centuries.

The Book of Mormon is a book of scriptures written by ancient prophets, like the Bible; but it was written by a different set of prophets for a different group of people. Much of the Bible was written in Israel. However, most of the Book of Mormon was originally written in America, beginning with prophets who came from Jerusalem. The exception is the Book of Ether which deals with people who came from the Tower of Babel directly to America.

At least some of the ancient prophets who wrote the Book of Mormon knew that the theory of evolution would exist in our days and that it would be a serious challenge to people's belief in God and His prophets. The Book of Mormon talks about the theory of evolution in three different places!!! The word "evolution" did not exist among the ancient prophets who wrote the Book of Mormon so many words that we use today cannot be found in the Book of Mormon.

The Book of Mormon gives everyone a feel for what God thinks about some of the leaders of the theory of evolution movement today!!! In fact, there are some atheists/evolutionists that God really doesn't like!!! There is a special category in hell for them (I am not joking)!!!

The phrase: "like unto the son of perdition" is used in the Book of Mormon (3 Nephi 29:5-7) along with a description of who fits into this category. I assume this category fits between the Telestial Kingdom and the Sons of Perdition (The "Sons of Perdition" category is solely for Latter-Day Saints). So the "like unto the son of perdition" is at the very bottom of the categories for non-Mormons and is primarily, and perhaps exclusively, for non-Mormons!!!

Richard Dawkins is easily the most famous of the atheists/evolutionists today. He is the "poster child" for easily fitting the criteria for the "like unto the son of perdition" category (according to my research), but many others also qualify!!! But God is the only judge of where people will end up after Judgment Day (i.e. after the Second Coming) so I can only issue warnings!!!

Here is my warning: it is very serious in the eyes of God to kill people physically or to kill people spiritually!!! Which is worse?? I suppose it depends on the case. But the bottom two categories in this list of God's rewards and punishments are for spiritual murder, not physical murder!!!

Ponder that for a moment!!!

Here are the five kingdoms that everyone will fit into after the Second Coming of Christ (from best to worst):
1) Celestial Kingdom (for the very good people),
2) Terrestrial Kingdom (for the honorable people),
3) Telestial Kingdom (for murderers, perhaps adulterers - depending on their repentance and other factors),
4) Like Unto the Son of Perdition (I assume that most, if not all, of those in this category will not be Latter-Day Saints),
5) Son of Perdition (ONLY for Latter-Day Saints)

Note that the bottom two categories, the worst two categories, are purely about spreading false doctrines and attempting to destroy people's belief in God!! The punishments for both of these two categories are worse than the punishment for murder!!!

There is more about the "Like Unto The Son of Perdition" punishment in the "First Book" article mentioned below.

My point is that the Book of Mormon was published more than 110 years before the birth of Richard Dawkins, yet it described him (and many others) with perfect accuracy when it talks about the "Like Unto The Son Of Perdition" punishment (the key versus will be highlighted when you open the new window):
Book of Mormon: 3 Nephi 29:5-7

I believe that Dawkins, the late Christopher Hitchens and hundreds of others are at high risk for falling into this category!!!

If you know how to read between the lines: wo, wo, wo unto any judges (from local judges all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court) or school district administrators or others who force school teachers to exclusively teach the theory of evolution in school!!! God will not be mocked!!! Atheism/evolution is a false religion (i.e. a belief system)!!!

God can cast your soul into hell forever!!! The Supreme Court of the United States can only throw you into jail until you die. But I should emphasize that ALL judges will be judged by God, whether they believe in God or not!!!

Yes, God far outranks those on the U.S. Supreme Court!!! Our founding fathers and their families were very religious people!! America was founded precisely to have freedom of religion!!!

So let's get back to talking about science.


The Sixteen Cells Mystery

One of the major problems with the theory of evolution is explaining the control of cell divisions so that a single fertilized egg can become a crying baby. Does DNA, for example, control these cell divisions?? THE ANSWER TURNS OUT TO BE: NO!!!

What we look like is a combination of three things:
1) Our spirit,
2) The DNA of our father,
3) The DNA of our mother

One problem with ignoring our spirit is that a new human baby has a lot more cells (about 37.2 billion) than the number of nucleotides on their DNA (3.2 billion)!! Vastly sophisticated algorithms on DNA would be needed on DNA for DNA to pull this off.

The next article mentions very specific reasons why DNA cannot completely control cell divisions!!! It fact, it is impossible!!! After reading this article you will wonder if DNA has anything to do with cell divisions - it does but only as a database for the spirit!!
Article: The Sixteen Cells Mystery!! [This article is very complex and is currently under revision]

As is demonstrated in that article, neither "evolution" nor scientists can control cell divisions in order to create a living animal from a single fertilized egg unless God cooperates and gives the animal a spirit!!!

It turns out that humans and all other animals (and likely plants) MUST HAVE A SPIRIT which is absolutely essential to controlling cell divisions!! The spirit is also absolutely essential to creating "life". "The Sixteen Cells Mystery" article is an absolute proof that all animals, including humans, have a spirit that could only have been created by God!!!

There is a related article on the human spirit called: The Spirit Of The Person:
Article: The Spirit Of The Person

So let's talk about the very foundation of the theory of evolution, the claim that one species can "evolve" into a new and improved species.


The DNA In Male Sperm Cells and Female Ovum

Note: From now on we will say little or nothing about the issue of a "spirit," we will be focusing on DNA, assuming that it is DNA that has the information to convert a fertilized egg into a baby animal!!!

The very foundation of the theory of evolution is that one species can "evolve" into a new and improved species!!! For example, the athiests may claim that humans "evolved" from bonobo.

But let us say this another way:: The foundation of the theory of evolution has become the claim that the DNA of one species (e.g. bonobo, or any other primate you want to pick) can "evolve" into new and improved DNA to create a new and improved species (e.g. humans)!!!!

It is a fact that the DNA of one species is different than the DNA of another species. In fact, a "unique species" is, or should be, defined by its unique DNA structure!!!

Every existing and extinct animal species requires/required three unique types of DNA strands to perpetuate the species:
1) One type of DNA in each male sperm cell (in the male) to create a male baby,
2) One type of DNA in each female sperm cell (in the male) to create a female baby, and
3) One type of DNA in each ovum (in the female) which is gender-neutral.

The sex of the baby depends on which type of sperm cell (e.g. male or female) gets to the ovum first (after the male and female have had "sex"). There is literally a swimming race of sperm cells to get to the ovum first!!! I link to a cute YouTube video which shows this swimming race (if you want to look at it now, search for the two words "Conception Explained" and click the blue link to a YouTube video and then come back here where the first occurrence of "Conception Explained" is).

At any given time, a male has many sperm cells, each of which has a unique sequence of nucleotides!! And a female may have multiple ovum at the same time, each with a unique DNA sequence of nucleotides. This is in itself a massive reason the theory of evolution is false because every one of these DNA strands, both those to create male offspring and those to create female offspring and those in an ovum (which are gender-neutral), must align with every other DNA strand in that species at the function level (e.g. the section of DNA which creates the liver) so that each baby is unique!!!

The fact that each of these male DNA strands in the male is unique (ditto for the females) is itself an incredible fact that alone proves the theory of evolution is false!!! Identical twins boys (or girls) are not created by identical DNA strands, but rather they both develop from the same zygote (the union of a male and female DNA strand) which splits and forms two identical embryos.

If God had not designed DNA that way, every man on this planet would look exactly alike and every woman on this planet would look exactly alike!!! If you were at a dance, you wouldn't know who to take home and kiss goodnight!!! Well, human spirits are also involved in what we look like. More on that from time to time.

Because there is so much variety in EVERY DNA strand, if a mother has seven boys (or girls) every one of them (except identical twins) will look different!!

Identical twins look alike, but they likely act very differently. That is because each of them has a different spirit which is what controls behavior.

DNA is at the foundation of many of the strongest reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true!!!


To Create A New Species (e.g. Humans) From An Older Species (e.g. Bonobo) Via Evolution (The Older Species Will Still Exist)

The very heart and soul of the theory of evolution is that one species (e.g. bonobo) can "evolve" into a new and improved species (e.g. humans).

But with the discovery of DNA, the heart and soul of the theory of evolution is that the DNA of one species can be randomly (because the claim of evolution is that there is no God) mutate into a new and improved DNA strand for a new species.

To create a new species from an old species (in this example the conversion of bonobo DNA into human DNA is discussed) requires the creation of four new and improved DNA strands to start the human race:
1) One male DNA strand in a bonobo male sperm cell (in the male bonobo) must randomly mutate into a human male sperm cell to create the first human male baby.
2) One female DNA strand in a bonobo female sperm cell (in the male bonobo) must randomly mutate into a human female sperm cell to create the first human female baby.
3) One gender-neutral DNA strand in the ovum of the female bonobo must randomly change into a human gender-neutral DNA strand and be fertilized by one of the new human male sperm cells. This is what creates the male human (who is delivered by the female bonobo).
4) One gender-neutral DNA strand in the ovum of the female bonobo must randomly change into a human gender-neutral DNA strand and be fertilized by one of the new human female sperm cells. This is what creates the female human (who is delivered by the female bonobo).

This process creates two fertilized ovum, with human DNA, so that the bonobo mother can have two human children, a male and female. Of course the bonobo mother could have two female human children (or two male human children) in which case the human race would not yet begin.

Here is a major problem for evolution: the same millions of changes would need to be made to all four of these bonobo to human DNA strands and after these millions of brainless changes the four new human DNA strands must align with each other at the function level!!!!

Sorry, this is not going to happen - you can kiss the theory of evolution goodbye!!!

And I should add that the bonobo mother must not reject/kill her weird, mutant children (i.e. human children) because they don't look like her other precious and lovely and beautiful bonobo children!!!

PONDER THIS CAREFULLY: Four bonobo DNA strands must be modified (two inside a male bonobo and two inside a female bonobo) into four human DNA strands in order for the human species (i.e. one male human and one female human) to "evolve" from the bonobo species!!!

Here is the killer for evolution: these four new human DNA strands will be a different length than the bonobo DNA and yet they must align with each other at the function level (e.g. the section that creates the new human liver must align on all four DNA strands)!!!!!!!!!

And you thought the evolution debate was simple. Nope, not after the discovery of DNA!!!

With this understanding, let me restate part what I just said: the theory of evolution has become the claim that four DNA strands of one species can be accidentally changed and improved into four new and improved DNA strands to create a new and improved species!!!

And after these four new DNA human strands are created they must align with each other at the function level!!

In short, what this means is that the custodians of the theory of evolution today must now claim that millions of the same changes to DNA must accidentally happen to each of four DNA strands of one species (e.g. bonobo DNA) and the end result of these millions of accidents is four new and improved DNA strands to create a new and massively improved species - humans, whose four new and improved DNA strands must align with each other at the function level (e.g. the sections that create the liver via cell divisions must align with each other)!!!

But there is a complication: the DNA that creates the human brain must be massively more sophisticated than the DNA that creates the bonobo brain!! So "evolution" must make massive, massive improvements to all four bonobo DNA strands while all of this is going on!!! Would you hire a bonobo as a computer programmer???

Do you think that it can get worse for evolution??? Yes it can. All of this must happen in the same latitude, longitude and timeframe otherwise the mating of either bonobo, to create the new humans, will not happen!!

For example, if evolution were true and if the first human male baby was born to a bonobo mother four hundred years before the first human female baby was born to a different bonobo mother in a different country, and 1,000 miles apart, you would not be reading this article!!!

And all of this must have happened at least one million times to account for the roughly one million current animal species!! Well actually, four million DNA strands would be needed to create one million new species of animals.

Is your brain still working?? Oh it gets worse - much, much worse!!!

All of these millions of changes to DNA must happen in one generation or else the "evolving" DNA will not be able to create a viable baby. Or to put it another way, if scientists claimed it took multiple generations of bonobo DNA to make all of these millions of changes to four bonobo DNA strands, then the sequential subsets of partial mutations would have to align in the correct generation of mutations (between bonobo and human)!!

This makes the statistical problems of evolution far, far worse, which is why I say it must happen in one generation, meaning evolution has its best statistical chance to be successful at creating a new species from an old species if everything happens in one generation!!

However, doing it in one generation has its own sets of problems for evolution. For example, how could that many mutations occur in one generation to four bonobo DNA strands!!

Thus, it is statistically impossible (within the realm of credibility) to happen in one generation and it is even more statistically impossible to happen in multiple generations!!

While we have talked about some of the statistical issues of bonobo DNA changing into human DNA, there are also some very, very serious physical issues!!! The physical issues with the theory of evolution are a very different topic than what we have talked about so far!!!


Can "Evolution" Physically Create A New Species (A New DNA Strand) From An Old Species (From An Old DNA Strand)??

To create a new species from an old species, four DNA strands of the old species need to be physically changed into four DNA strands for the new species. In this section we will only focus on one of these DNA strands (any of them).

DNA does not reside in a classroom, it resides inside of a cell. Thus, to change an existing species into a new species requires that the things that are inside of cells be able to physically change the DNA inside that cell.

However, neither "evolution" nor "accidents" can physically modify an existing DNA strand while it is inside of a cell, which is the only place that "evolution" can occur!! This is too complicated a subject to be on the home page, so here is an article about the physical reasons the DNA of one species cannot "evolve" into the DNA of a new and improved species while inside of a cell:
Article: Changing The Length Of A DNA Strand By Evolution/Accidents Is Impossible

The complete absurdity, both mathematical and physical, (the word "absurdity" is an overly diplomatic word for this paragraph) that four bonobo DNA strands (or any other primate you want to pick as the ancestor of humans) could each accidently have the same millions of synchronized, random subsets of changes to four bonobo DNA strands (e.g. to convert bonobo DNA into human DNA), including the "computer programs" on DNA which control cell divisions (which humans cannot comprehend if DNA does control cell divisions), and this must happen inside of two sperm cells of at least one bonobo male, and inside of two bonobo female ovum of at least one bonobo female), and the new humans must have a MASSIVELY SUPERIOR BRAIN MEANING THE ALGORITHMS ON HUMAN DNA MUST BE MASSIVELY MORE SOPHISTICATED THAN THE ALGORITHMS ON BONOBO DNA, -- is mathematical nonsense literally beyond human comprehension!!

This website is not being written by a bonobo (though some might think it is)!!

So "evolution" is claimed not only to create new species, but to create a vastly superior new species!!! This is nothing but wishful thinking.

As always, it gets worse for evolution.


The Two-Male DNA Alignment Issue - This Section Will Blow Your Mind!!!!

Let us look at the two types of male DNA strands in the sperm cells for any animal species. One creates a male baby and one creates a female baby. Both of them must align with the female DNA strand in her ovum. But if each of them aligns with the female DNA strand in the ovum, this implies that the two types of male DNA must align with each other (at the function level of course), though one will lead to a male baby and one will lead to a female baby!!!!

There is no specific reason the two male DNA strands need to align with each other at the function level except for the fact that BOTH OF THEM must align with the female DNA.

Here is the amazing thing: two male DNA strands must align with each other (at the function level but not at the nucleotide level), yet one of them will create a male baby and one of them will create a female baby!!! This is incomprehensible!!! Yet it applies to roughly 1,000,000 animals species which are currently on this planet!!!

I want to show this somewhat graphically to emphasize my point. There are three kinds of DNA strands for every species:
1) In the male, male DNA in the male sperm cells to create a male baby,
2) In the male, female DNA in the female sperm cells to create a female baby,
3) In the female, gender neutral DNA in the female ovum.

All three of these DNA strands are very, very different yet they must align with each other at the function level!!

Now let us ignore the third item in the above list and show the list again:
1) In the male, male DNA in the male sperm cells to create a male baby,
2) In the male, female DNA in the female sperm cells to create a female baby.

What this means is that the two types of DNA in the male, one of which creates a male baby and one of which creates a female baby, must align with each other at the function level because both of them must align with the gender neutral DNA in the female ovum at the function level!!!!

Yet one of these DNA strands will lead to a male baby and the other DNA strand will lead to a female baby!!! Yet they must align with each other at the function level!!!!!!!!!!

This is absolutely unbelievable!!! And this concept applies to one million living animal species and nine million extinct animal species!!!! Two DNA strands must align with each other at the function level, yet one will create a male baby and the other will create a female baby!!! NO WAY!!!!! But God has done this for ten million animal species, one million of which are alive today!!!

Here is a homework assignment tonight for human scientists. For some extinct species for which they only have (or a living species if the sequence of nucleotides in the male sperm cells, to create a female baby, is withheld from the scientists):
1) In the male, male DNA in the male sperm cells,
3) In the female, gender neutral DNA in the female ovum.

Their task is to create:
2) In the male, create female DNA for the female sperm cells which must align with the male DNA, at the function level, for the male sperm cells and it must align with the DNA in the ovum of the female!!!

Good luck!!! I was born in 1946 so I am not going to live long enough for that to happen!!! Nor will my great-grandchildren live long enough!!!

In fact, scientists are NOT EVEN CLOSE to decoding the entire DNA strand of any species of plants, animals or insects!!! Remember, most of DNA is a database for the spirit to use.

How could this much DNA have been created by nothing but accidents!!?? The atheists and evolutionists have no answer to this question!!!


Permutations Of Nucleotides And Related Issues

A "permutation" is a unique way to order (i.e. sequence) a set of objects, such as the set of nucleotides on a DNA strand. There are a vast, vast number of possible unique permutations of nucleotide sequences for every animal species. For example, as a baseline there are about 4500 atoms in this Universe, but the number of possible permutations of a human DNA strand, both male and female (male DNA in male sperm cells of the male and female DNA in female sperm cells of the male and the DNA in ovum of the female must align with either of the male DNA strands at the function level), is 43,200,000,000)!!

Here is the key point: the vast, vast, vast, (insert the word "vast" one billion more times) percent of these permutations would NOT create a viable human being or any other animal species.

If evolution were true, and the DNA for all species (not just humans) had been sequenced by accidents, there would literally be more worthless DNA strands (which did not have a viable permutation of nucleotides) laying on the ground on this planet, than there are atoms in a trillion, trillion, trillion, ... Universes!! I talk about this easy to prove fact in the "Permutations" article:
Article: Permutations - The Ultimate Death Of The Theory Of Evolution

So where are the countless failures of unusable DNA strands created by nothing but the accidents of evolution?? There are none!!! Yes, occasionally there is a mutation to a DNA strand, but these are very rare compared to the massive, massive number of worthless DNA strands that evolution would create!!! And in science in general, accidents never make something more sophisticated!!!

Bar charts are a very good way to compare intelligence to no intelligence. Look at each bar chart in this chapter of one of the free eBooks on this website and then look carefully at the last bar chart to see a histogram of pure randomness/accidents (i.e. what evolution would create):
Book: Patterns of Intelligence - Chapter 18 - (Study All Bar Charts!!)

"Evolution" is brain dead and every DNA strand created by "evolution" would have an equal number of A, C, G and T nucleotides and the bar chart would look like the last bar chart in that chapter!!!

I can assure the reader that there is no plant or animal DNA strand on this planet that would yield a bar chart like the last bar chart in this chapter!!!

And let us not forget that everything I have talked about must be done by blind, deaf and dumb accidents!!!

We have no choice except to conclude that the theory of evolution (i.e. the theory of accidents) cannot be true!!! A "new species" (i.e. with four new and improved DNA strands) simply cannot be created due to the "rail issue," permutation issues and other issues inside of cells. There is simply no mechanism inside of a cell which can make the kind of "massively sophisticated fixes" that evolution requires, nor can such a mechanism overcome the statistical problems of permutations and pure accidents!!!

Let us go back to where we started: we should remind ourselves that evolution DOES NOT EXIST and that accidents have an I.Q. of ZERO!!!

Do the math:
ZERO (species have functional DNA which has been created by superman, batman or the equally imaginary theory of evolution)
ZERO (species have functional DNA which has been created by blind, deaf and dumb accidents, which always do more harm than good)
ZERO PLUS ZERO EQUALS ZERO (i.e. there should be zero life on this planet!!!)


Evolution From The First Living Cell To Human DNA

The atheists/evolutionists claim that the first living thing on this planet was a single cell, which I suspect that some would call the "first living cell."

If evolution were true, then all species, including humans, descend from this "first living cell!!!"

To expand on these concepts, let us focus on evolution from the "first living cell" (i.e. the first life on this earth which would have been a single cell if evolution were true) to human DNA, the most sophisticated DNA strand on earth - though nowhere near the longest DNA strand (that title goes to a fish).

Let us assume the average increase in the number of nucleotides on each successive DNA strand (i.e. each successive species), from first living cell to human DNA, was 50,000 nucleotides. Given that average, the number of species between the first living cell and human DNA, inclusive, would have been 64,000 species.

So I would have a father, a grandfather, a great grandfather, a great great grandfather, ..., and eventually my ultimate 64,000th great grandfather - the first living cell!!!

I should note that early in this process, where animals were involved (e.g. my great great, ..., grandfather species), to create each new animal species four existing DNA strands would need to be massively changed to create four new DNA strands for each successive species of animals!!! This means that for every new animal species the computer algorithms to control cell divisions would also need to be changed, realigned and improved for each of the four DNA strands needed for the new animal species!!

In other words, for each of the 64,000 new species the permutations of nucleotides would have had to become MORE SOPHISTICATED (if we were going from First Living Cell to you or me) and many of the new species would need four DNA strands!!!

Given these facts, let us consider:
(1) evolution is completely stupid (i.e. it is nothing but accidents), and
(2) DNA cannot be modified inside of cells by evolution (much less intelligently modified inside of cells) and
(3) the computer programs on DNA, to control cell divisions, would have had to be dramatically reprogrammed on four DNA strands for every new animal species,
(4) therefore we must conclude that the claim that humans "evolved" from a "first living cell" is total nonsense!!!

SORRY, you (i.e. your DNA) did not evolve from the "first living cell", your 64,000th great grandfather!!!


Cell Biology And Evolution

The sophistication of cells is a major proof that the theory of evolution is false. Every cell in your body is vastly more complex than any automobile ever made!!! Hundreds of scientists have PhD degrees in Cell Biology and in order to get a PhD you are supposed to make some new discovery about cells!!! Cells could not have come to exist by a series of accidents!!!

There are an estimated 200 different kinds of cells in the human body!! I have written an article on Cell Biology which is probably more than you want to read at this time, but you might want to glance through it (it links to several other websites because cell biology is not my field):
Article: Cell Biology And Evolution


The Hidden Agenda Of The Atheists/Evolutionists

So why do evolutionists, even after the discovery of DNA, claim that a series of accidents (i.e. evolution) created the DNA of the mother and father of every animal species, current and extinct??

Science and statistics are irrelevant to the atheists and evolutionists because they have a hidden agenda!! Author and attorney Phillip E. Johnson explains the hidden agenda of the evolutionists:

  • "Science [i.e. the scientific establishment] is committed to philosophical naturalism [i.e. atheism and the theory of evolution] and therefore science must assume that no Creator, and no purposeful intelligence, is behind our existence ... All that science can address is the question of: 'granted that we are here as a result of purposeless material mechanisms, what's the most plausible purposeless material mechanism that we can imagine?'"
    Phillip E. Johnson, professor, author, attorney; quoted on UCTV

Read that quote two or three times, it is a brilliant observation!!! No matter how absurd the theory of evolution is, "converts" to creation science will always be very, very rare!!!


The Universe And The Big Bang

Surprisingly there is something that both the atheists/evolutionists and creationists agree on!!! Both sides of the evolution debate agree that there was a Big Bang because of the discovery of Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation, which yielded two Nobel Prizes!! They deserved the prizes!!

But here is the key question: was the Big Bang designed and executed by God (or by someone He delegated that authority) or was the Big Bang created by an accidental explosion!! The Big Bang was not an accident, it was carefully designed and executed by God or by someone He delegated the authority to do it (e.g. Christ).

Here is why I say this!! The object that exploded would have been massively too dense for accidents, or even humans, to create and then explode!! Can you imagine humans trying to cram all of the atoms/matter in an entire Universe into a spherical object that had a 1,000 mile radius (or whatever the radius was estimated to be this week)!!! Well, we have no idea how big the object was that exploded. Some people say it was very small.

The point is that humans cannot create something that dense and that small such that it has all the particles in the Universe crammed in it!!! And even if they could, which they can't, they certainly could not light a fuse, run like hell and then explode the object into a Universe and survive the explosion!!!

By the way, that is a clever way to create a Universe if your science class wants to create a Universe some day.

Only God could have created that particle (i.e. object) and then exploded it!!! And He did!!

Just how big is the Universe? Well, watch this incredible seven-minute YouTube video (and the music is great too) and you will understand just how amazing God is (you will love this video like I do, I have watched it many times because it is so cool):
Amazing YouTube Video: Star Size Comparison 2


The Term "Multiverse"

The term "multiverse" (meaning an infinite number of Big Bangs) has an interesting history because one side of the evolution debate believes that the infinite number of Big Bangs (i.e. the "multiverse") has created an infinite number of Universes and the other side believes that the infinite number of Big Bangs (i.e. the multiverse) has only created one Universe that survived (obviously our Universe) because our Universe was the only Universe to have the correct set of physical constants in order to have a stable Universe.

The foundation of the problem is that our Universe has an incredibly accurate set of "physical constants"!!! The problem is that a random Big Bang is not likely to create a viable Universe because even if only one of the key physical constants was not unbelievably accurate our Universe would not exist, nor would we.

Originally (and probably currently as well) the term "multiverse" was used as an insult to the creation scientists because orthodox scientists assumed our Universe was the only Universe (though our telescopes cannot see far enough to even guess whether this is true or not) that ACCIDENTALLY had the correct set of physical constants.

But the creation scientists are perfectly happy believing there may be billions or even an infinite number of Universes, all with the correct set of physical constants because God designed the Universes before they existed!! Where does space end???

But a random and accidental Big Bang is very, very, very unlikely to create a viable Universe because the physical constants (e.g. the gravitational constant) have to be unbelievably accurate!!!

So if there is no God, then there is probably only one Universe (I agree with the atheists/evolutionists on this one), but if there is a God there are probably an infinite number of Universes!!

The assumption of the atheists is that there had to have been an infinite number of Big Bangs (i.e. what they called the "Multiverse") in order to get one Universe which had the correct set of physical constants!!! Our Universe was the only one that survived because our Universe just happened to have the right set of physical constants for a stable Universe, whereas none of the other Universes (i.e. none of the other Big Bangs) survived because they did not have the correct combination of physical constants to create a Universe that could survive.

The atheists/evolutionsts have had no problem with believing in an infinite number of Big Bangs, they have a problem with an infinite number of correct sets of physical constants because they are so important and they have to be unbelievably accurate!!

Many creation scientists agree that there have been an infinite number of Big Bangs, but they believe that every one of the Big Bang's created a viable Universe, meaning there are an infinite number of viable Universes in space, because all of them were created by God (or by someone He delegated that authority) and they have the correct physical constants!!!

There could only be an infinite number of Universes if there was a God to control the unbelievably accurate physical constants for each Universe He created via a Big Bang (or He could delegate some of the Big Bangs to others).

The amazing thing about the Universe is that every time scientists put a bigger and better telescope into space they discover more galaxies!!! Imagine a telescope in space with a mirror which has a diameter of 10,000 miles!!!! I would love to see pictures from that telescope!!! That telescope would likely see other Universes!!

I suspect that some, if not all, of the physical constants are controlled by aether, but scientists refuse to even talk about aether because Nichola Tesla could use aether to create free energy. The money-powers don't like cures for cancer or free energy!!!

Tesla was blacklisted by orthodox physicists because much of their money, and all of their prestige, is based on non-Tesla physics (i.e. Einstein physics).

Well, some physicists have simply called aether by a different name (e.g. Higgs Boson). Higgs won a Nobel Prize but only because he used a different name for aether. If he had used the word "aether" instead of "Higgs Boson" no physics journal would have read his paper, much less published it, and he would not have won a Nobel Prize!!!

When I worked at Sprint (the fiber-optics telecommunications giant), many years ago, I led an experiment that we did to determine if aether existed. We proved that aether existed!! I wrote an article on our experiment that detected aether, but five physics journals refused to even read the article that I wrote on our experiment because we used the term "aether" plus we used the even more forbidden word: "Tesla", who could create free energy.

Nichola Tesla is literally the "father" of the modern day world. The electrical grid was his invention. Many parts of cars were his inventions. You cannot believe how many critical things that he discovered or developed have helped our modern world, but yet Tesla has not been given any credit for these discoveries!!!

What a world we live on. The super-rich suppress cures for cancer, and scientists suppress information about free energy and who knows what else.

This concludes the introduction of this website, but there are more articles linked to below.


Note: This home page is about to shift gears. If you have read this far, there is much more to read because there are many articles which are linked to from this home page. If I were you I would take a break, a long break, before reading on. There is a lot of stuff on this website, so just keep track of when you want to take a break!!!


Please Join The Fight: Share This Website With Others!!

I cannot say this often enough: Please share this amazing website with 15 or 20 of your friends on social media (e.g. Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, Pinterest, etc.) and ask your friends to share this site with 15 or 20 of their friends on social media!! Also, please link to this website from your website!! JOIN THE FIGHT!!!!!

Until hundreds of people do these things this website will get less hits that a classified m.i.l.i.t.a.r.y g..r.a.d.e T.o.p S.e.c.r.e.t website because G.o,o.g.l,e doesn't have a clue what a "subject matter expert website" is and thus G.o,o.g.l,e will continue to rank this website very, very, very, very low on the totem pole!!

So let us now change gears after you take a break.



The Sophistication Of Human DNA

The most sophisticated computer programs on this planet are human DNA which contain the instructions to create a male and female human baby via billions of cell divisions.

The human DNA strand, which is inside the fertilized egg of a new human mother, contains 3.2 billion nucleotides (A, C, G, or T) , which is a computer program that is so sophisticated that a single cell, with a single DNA strand (the DNA strand is seven feet long but it is coiled up to fit inside of a cell that cannot be seen with the naked eye), namely the fertilized egg inside of a mother-to-be, has the intelligence on the DNA to create an entire human baby, via 30 billion cell divisions, who has 30 billion cells and 60,000 miles of blood vessels, etc.

The 60,000 miles of blood vessels in this newborn baby would wrap around the earth at the equator twice, with 10,000 miles of blood vessels left over!!

In addition, these blood vessels must be fully enclosed before blood starts to flow or the baby would bleed to death long before it is even born!!!

When the baby is born he or she will have an incredible brain which is connected to a massive nervous system, a skull to protect the brain, a spine to protect the spinal cord (the spinal cord is a cylindrical bundle of nerve fibers), two eyes which are connected to the nervous system, a beating heart, a liver, a pancreas, 300 bones (which eventually fuse into 206 bones), etc. etc.!!

The DNA in a sperm cell of the father of the baby contributes part of the DNA for the new baby and the DNA in the mother's ovum (egg) contributes part of the DNA for the new baby. Thus, the DNA strands from the mother and father must align with each other!!!

But it is even more complicated than that. Men actually have two types of DNA strands: the DNA in the "male sperm cells" which will lead to a male baby and the DNA in the "female sperm cells" which will lead to a female baby. The DNA in the mother's egg/ovum is gender-neutral.

So if a male sperm cell gets to the mother's egg first (along with its DNA), a male baby will result. If a female sperm cell gets to the mother's egg first (along with its DNA), a female baby will result. The sex of the baby is literally a swimming race of sperm cells to get to the ovum first!! See this amazing YouTube video:
YouTube Video: Conception Explained

But note that the three DNA strands (2 from the father, though only one is used each time conception happens [the one that gets to the ovum first], and one from the mother) must align with each other!!

But the alignment is more sophisticated than you think. The father's DNA to create a male baby has features on it to create the male sex organs. Likewise, the father's DNA to create a female baby has features to create the very different female sex organs. Yet the three human DNA strands still need to align with each other whether the baby will be a male or female!!

In fact, three DNA strands of equal length (the length varies by species) are required for every species which has both a male and female (e.g. elephants, lions, tigers, cats, dogs, mice, etc.)!! And even extinct species such as the Woolly Mammoth, Dodo Bird and Mastodon needed three types of DNA strands which needed to align with each other.

Here is a spectacular T.E.D. YouTube video which visually shows (not an animlation!!!) what happens to a human fetus from conception to birth. The author attributes this sophistication to God. He is obviously correct!!!
YouTube Video: Conception to birth -- visualized | Alexander Tsiaras

This is another fascinating T.E.D. YouTube video on abnormal brain scans. FASCINATING VIDEO:
YouTube Video: The most important lesson from 83,000 brain scans | Daniel Amen


Comparing DNA to Computer Programs

The evolution debate made a dramatic change when DNA was discovered in 1953!! Scientists now had to explain how DNA came to exist by a series of accidents!!

Today it is obvious that a single fertilized egg contains the instructions to create a baby animal, even humans, via millions or billions of cell divisions!! However, scientists don't have the SLIGHEST CLUE how DNA can create a new baby via millions or billions of cell divisions!!!

We can compare human DNA to a computer program, though human DNA is vastly more sophisticated than any computer program ever written by humans.

If evolution were true, computer programmers would not be needed because random number generators (i.e. evolution or accidents) could create the source code or object code for every new computer program on earth!!

Furthermore, to create a new and improved computer program from an existing computer program; all you would need to do is apply a random number generator to the source code or object code of the old computer program. This process should work every time if evolution is true because there is no evidence of failures of the "accidents" of evolution!!

But random number generators could NEVER create the source code or object code for a new computer program, nor could random number generators modify the souce code or object code of an existing viable computer program and create a new computer program with new features!!

Any computer programmer who was told to write new source code or object code for a new computer program (or to improve an existing computer program) with random number generators, would just laugh at the idea. Yet this same computer programmer may believe in the theory of evolution because he/she does not understand what DNA does.

It is now known that human DNA is like the "object code" of a massively complex computer program. But there is no "source code" and there is no compiler.

To demonstrate this with bar charts, see one of the chapters in one of the free eBooks on this website. This chapter is a series of bar graphs which prove, beyond any doubt, that accidents cannot create a viable DNA strand. And these bar charts do not even discuss the physical construction of DNA!! Click:
Book: Patterns of Intelligence - Chapter 18 - (Study All Bar Charts!!)

The term "evolution" in the time of Charles Darwin and the term "evolution" today mean totally different things because Darwin knew almost nothing about cells and he knew nothing about DNA!!! Darwin only saw the visual form of animals.

Can the atheists and evolutionists explain how accidents created the DNA for several million species by a series of pure, undirected accidents?? Absolutely Not!!


What Computer Programming Can Teach Us About Evolution

We have already talked about the problems with creating a new species from an old species by mentioning that existing DNA cannot be modified. But there are other reasons a new species cannot be created from an old species even if DNA could be modified.

Let us compare the claim that a new species can be created from an old species to the computer language C#.

When writing or changing a computer program in C# there are three steps:
Step #1) Have a computer programmer, trained in C#, change existing "source code" or write new "source code." Source code is what the computer programmer understands,
Step #2) "Compile" the source code. The "compiler" is a computer program which converts the source code into binary code that the computer understands,
Step #3) The "binary code," created by the compiler, is executed by the computer.

Now suppose that a perfectly good C# computer program needed a major upgrade to add a new feature to the program. There are two options to make the changes:
Option #1) Have the computer programmer make the necessary changes and additions to the source code and then recompile the program, or
Option #2) Randomly mutate (meaning randomly delete, add and change bits) the object code of the original program and hope that the new object code of the program has all of the old features of the old program plus it has all of the desired new features.

No computer programmer on this planet would choose the second option!! It would be a waste of time and would totally destroy the old program and it would not have any new or old features that worked!!!

Yet Option #2 is precisely the way that evolution must work!!! There is no "source code" for DNA, there is only "object code" on the DNA. Evolution can only RANDOMLY change the DNA via random mutations!! Yet the atheists and evolutionists claim that the DNA of a perfectly good species can be randomly mutated (by evolution) and the random mutations will create a new and improved species EVERY TIME!!!

This is nonsense because DNA includes computer programs vastly more sophisticated than any computer program ever written by any team of human beings!!! And the DNA only contains the object code!!

With the discovery of DNA the evolution debate should have left the domain of biologists and been put under the domain of statisticians looking at DNA. But that will never happen because there are many atheists who need the theory of evolution to sell their books and get new converts to atheism!!

In addition to things on this earth, scientists also cannot create a single sun from scratch. And is it logical to think that our sun and all of the stars (e.g. the supergiant star VY Canis Majoris), galaxies, superclusters of galaxies, etc. in the Universe came to exist by an accidental explosion called the Big Bang?

It is absurd to claim that accidents created all DNA, all cells, all stars, all galaxies, etc. But these claims will never go away because the atheists and evolutionists will always be looking for converts. But the truth is that the claims of the atheists are complete scientific nonsense.

The prophets, past and present, are absolutely correct: God is the source of all DNA, cells, galaxies, etc.


Why Adam And Eve Are A Major Target Of The Theory of Evolution!!!

Before going on with the scientific reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true (and there are many, many reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true), we need to talk about why the theory of evolution even exists!!!

All Christians believe the Bible and the Bible talks about Adam and Eve. By claiming that humans descended from apes, Adam and Eve are claimed, by evolution, to not have existed!!!

Here is an article which lists, side-by-side, the teachings of God versus the teachings of the theory of evolution (in this case it is literally the teachings of satan):
Article: LDS Doctrines Versus Evolution Doctrines In Alma 30

However, all of us (this includes you), existed as spirits long, long before we were born on this planet. In fact, sometime before Adam and Eve were put on this planet by God (about 4,000 B.C.) we (that includes you and me) were alive, as spirits, and we were at a meeting called the "Grand Council."

  • Technical Note: while it is common for Latter-Day Saints to claim that our spirits are the children of God (and there is certainly nothing wrong with saying this), technically our spirits have existed forever. Joseph Smith said: "The spirit of man is not a created being; it existed from eternity, and will exist to eternity. Anything created cannot be eternal; and earth, water, etc., had their existence in an elementary state, from eternity." (Joseph Smith, in HC 3:387).

This quote implies that spirits cannot die. Not even an atomic bomb blast can kill a spirit because spirits are made from a different kind of matter.

It was at the Grand Council that satan (i.e. Lucifer) and his followers were cast out to become the devil and his angels. It was also at this meeting that the prophets, and many others, were chosen to perform their main duties on this planet.

At this meeting Jehovah did not promise to save all people (His plan was a plan of free agency), but Lucifer promised to save all people (his plan would have forced all of us to obey him and would have "saved" all people). Lucifer's plan was rejected by Heavenly Father!!

In other words, sometime before Adam and Eve were put on this earth there was a WAR IN HEAVEN, which we were at and we had to vote on who the Savior would be!!!! The battle was between the forces of Christ, who would later become the Savior, and the forces of Lucifer, who would very quickly become "the devil."

Both men volunteered to be the Savior. Jehovah was chosen and Lucifer rebelled and took countless people with him "down to hell."

Here is an article about this war:
Article: The War In Heaven Comes To Earth

This council was INCOMPREHENSIBLY IMPORTANT FOR EACH OF US!!! We would never have a physical body if we did not vote for Jehovah (i.e. Jesus Christ) to be the Savior of the world at this council. Yes, you were there and you voted for Jehovah to be the Savior.

Hitler, Stalin, Lenin, Mao Zedong and all of the other mass murders were there and all of them voted for Jehovah (i.e. Christ)!! But this life is a different type of test than the Grand Council. It is as if there are two sequential filters - the grand council filter (which has already happened) and the mortality filter (which is ongoing), though the grand council was far, far more dangerous because those who voted for Lucifer (now called the devil) in the Grand Council will never have a physical body!!! These are now the devil and his angels.

We know this council occurred before Adam and Eve were put on this planet (more than 6,000 years ago) because Adam was a key player in the event!!! Adam was essentially the Savior's top General at the Grand Council. So we have existed as spirits far longer than you might think!! But by design we do not remember anything that happened to us before we were born.

Because Adam was the main General of the forces of God and Christ, at the Grand Council, Adam is a key enemy of satan!!! And what does the theory of evolution teach?? Evolution teaches that we "evolved" from primates, meaning it teaches that Adam and Eve never existed!! The theory of evolution bypasses Adam and Eve.

To claim Adam and Eve have never existed, is one of the primary goals of satan as it was Adam who may have been the person who physically cast satan out of the Grand Council as Adam (i.e. Michael) was and still is the Savior's top general!!

The theory of evolution is satan's perfect doctrine because it eliminates the Godhead (Heavenly Father, Christ and the Holy Ghost) and almost as important, the theory of evolution eliminates Adam and Eve from ever existing!!!

The theory of evolution (satan's perfect doctrine) casts Adam and Eve out of even existing by claiming we "evolved" from other primates (e.g. Bonobo)!!!

The classic discourse on the origin of God, and the Grand Council, is the "King Follett Discourse" given by Joseph Smith not long before he was martyred. Here is a link to this article:
Speech: King Follett Discourse (The Prophet Joseph Smith)

This article is about the Grand Council, which all of us attended (even before Adam and Eve were put on this planet) and was mentioned in the King Follett Discourse. This is probably the most interesting article on this website:
Article: The Grand Council

The importance of this council, and the importance of our individual vote, cannot even remotely be comprehended!!!

As Adam was a major player in the Grand Council, Adam is a major enemy of satan. This is an article that provides a lot of detail about why the theory of evolution targets Adam and Eve and why the theory of evolution claims they never existed:
Article: Why The Theory Of Evolution Attacks Adam And Eve

Here is an article on comments by the First Presidency of the LDS church about the Origin of Man:
Article: The Origin of Man - First Presidency

God knew that the theory of evolution was coming in 1859 when Darwin's first book was published. In fact, the Book of Mormon, published in 1830 (29 years before Darwin's first book), predicted the coming forth of the theory of evolution in three different places!!

The Book of Mormon (considered "scripture" by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints or Mormon church) was published in 1830, which was 29 years before Darwin's first book; yet the Book of Mormon predicted the coming forth of the theory of evolution in three different places, as just mentioned. So God was well aware that the theory of evolution was coming, even in 1830!!

While this next article does not directly "deal with" teachers and professors, the warning to people like Richard Dawkins should give even teachers and professors cause to wonder whether they should be teaching their students that there is no God. The warnings come from the Book of Mormon, which was published 29 YEARS before Darwin's First Book:
Article: The First Book To Describe the Theory of Evolution Was NOT Written By Charles Darwin!!!

Here is an article of a key quote by the First Presidency in 1909 about the origin of man:
Understanding The Context of the 1909 and 1910 Statement Of The First Presidency

See also this article about LDS anti-evolution resources:
Article: Additional Section For Latter-Day Saints

This article, which was mentioned above, is for judges (even Federal and State Supreme Court judges), school board members, principals, teachers, etc. who are responsible for the teaching of the theory of evoultion:
Article: A Warning By God To Those Who Teach/Endorse/Force The Theory of Evolution To Students!!!

I should also mention that there was a world famous scientist, who was a contemporary of Charles Darwin, who did not in any degree agree with Charles Darwin!!! His name was Louis Agassiz (1807-1873). Here is an article about him:
Article: Louis Agassiz - The Contemporary of Darwin Who Denounced The Theory of Evolution


Let's Talk About Real Human DNA

Because the atheists have so many problems to deal with, they say that it took "billions of years" (their favorite phrase!!) to accidentally create a DNA strand and then accidentally sequence that DNA strand (so a baby animal survives). They apparently don't know anything about mathematics!!!

There are 43,200,000,000 different ways to sequence a male or female DNA strand. And the vast, vast, vast (insert the word "vast" 2 billion more times) percent of those permutations would not create a living anything. If evolution were true, our entire Universe (and many, many trillions of other Universes) would be full of dead, mutated, partially created animals and evolution would not have created a single viable living animal, much less a human being!!!

The problems with the theory of evolution apply to any species which has both a male and female DNA strand, though their DNA might not be as long as human DNA. But remember, even if the DNA strands were created by accident, the male DNA strand (actually 2 of them) would have to have a viable permutation of nucleotides and so would the female's.

By the way, human DNA is nowhere near the longest DNA strand. Some DNA is more than 40 times longer than human DNA!! But human DNA is the most sophisticated DNA because human DNA is able to create the human brain.

Remember, there are several million "species" of plants, animals and insects which have or currently exist on this planet, each with unique and highly sophisticated DNA. And many of these species have both a male and female (e.g. Bonobos) which have three DNA strands, like humans, which need to align in a very precise way!! No team of humans on this planet understand the DNA of an ant, much less human DNA.

In fact, if you added every type of DNA strand on this earth (e.g. male human DNA, male mouse DNA, male horse DNA, ..., female human DNA, female mouse DNA, female horse DNA, ...), the length of this DNA strand would be about one quadrillion (1015) nucleotides long!!

So if one DNA strand (for each species, male and female where applicable) were laid end-to-end, there would be 41,000,000,000,000,000 different ways to sequence all of the different types of DNA strands on this planet. Obviously only a tiny, tiny, tiny fraction of these would yield every type of animal, plant and insect on this planet.

How big is this number?? The number of ATOMS in our Universe is probably less than 41,000

The atheists and evolutionists always counter these facts with the claim that it took "millions of years" for new species to "evolve." The problem is that the DNA permutation issue is so damaging to the theory of evolution that a quadrillion quadrillion quadrillion years of random mutations to DNA COULD NOT CREATE A SINGLE VIABLE DNA STRAND FOR ANY ANIMAL!!!!

The atheists and evolutionists just don't understand or comprehend the mathematics of permutations!!!

But let's get back to human DNA.

Human DNA is the most sophisticated computer program on this planet - by a giant margin!! Human DNA is so sophisticated that scientists still only understand about 2% of human DNA. Yet the atheists and evolutionists want people to believe that DNA and cells and the Universe, etc. were all created by accidents!!!

Not a chance!!!

So what accident created the Universe according to the atheists? The Big Bang. There probably was a Big Bang, that is not the issue, but the question is whether the Big Bang was an accidental explosion or whether it was a carefully planned and executed explosion under the direction of God!! In fact, God delegated the explosion of the Big Bang and this is discussed elsewhere on this website.

On August 21, 2017, several members of my family drove me to Sedalia, Missouri to see a total eclipse of the sun. There is no way that our sun and moon and earth could align, by accident, to create a total eclipse of the sun!! This event is God bragging at His power, majesty and might!!! When we could see the corona of the Sun, we could not see any shadows on the roof where we were located. The entire event was awesome!! After the event I said to one of the ladies who was there that "this was not an accident." She totally agreed with me!!

In summary: we exist because of God (per the creation scientists) or accidents (per the atheists and evolutionists). That is the evolution debate in one sentence!!! Pure accidents, as the creative force, is the only option for the atheists and evolutionists!!!

Let us bring up another of the many issues related to DNA. How could the alignment of male DNA and female DNA (even at the gene level) have "evolved" (via trial and error from species to new species) because if the alignment was not perfect the first time, in an attempt to create new DNA for a new species (both male and female) from the DNA of an old species (both male and female), there would never have been a viable baby to perpetuate a new species!!

We could call this the "first time" problem for atheists and evolutionists. It is a major problem!!!

But there is yet another major problem for evolution. The problem is creating a new and impoved species from an "old" or "existing" species. This would require new and improved DNA. There are massive technical problems and mathematical problems in any attempt to change one DNA strand (i.e. one computer program) into a "new and improved" DNA strand (i.e. a new and improved computer program).

We can see this with real computer programs. Can you randomly change the object code of one computer program and expect to end up with a new and improved computer program which has new features?? Obviously not!! Now try to change the object code on the far more sophisticated male and female computer programs (i.e. DNA)!!

DNA is like object code, but it is vastly more sophisticated than human-designed computer object code. Not only is it STATISTICALLY impossible to change the intelligence on a DNA strand, it is also PHYSICALLY impossible to change a DNA strand (you can only DAMAGE DNA, you cannot change it)!!!! More on that later.

It is the intelligence of God versus the intelligence of accidents. God will always win that battle!!


DNA Must Be Perfect

Think of the DNA for the several million species on this planet which have or currently exist, as the most sophisticated computer programs on this planet. This is because the most sophisticated computer program ever written by human beings is less sophisticated than the DNA of a cockroach!! While a human designed computer program may be longer than a DNA strand, it is not more sophisticated.

In addition, if you had 99% of a complete DNA strand from the male and 97% of a complete DNA strand of the female (during the evolutionary process), this male and female could not have had any children!! Only 100% complete DNA from the male and 100% complete DNA from the female can align with each other and be able to create a viable child!!

DNA is "irreducibly complex," meaning every piece and sequence had to work the first time. For example, humans could not have "evolved" piecemeal from a prior species (e.g. a Bonobo), in addition to all of the other problems DNA causes for evolutionists.

But there is another factor that is involved in what we will look like when we are born. Before we were born we were a pure spirit in the "pre-existence." This spirit also affects what we look like when we are born. So what we look like when we are born is a combination of what our spirit looks like (and what our spirit looks like does not change over time) combined with one of the DNA strands of our father and one of the DNA strands of our mother. So what we look like is a combination of three things: our spirit and two DNA strands.

So ignoring the influence of our spirit, here is the key question: where did these three highly sophisticated DNA strands (two from the father and one from the mother) come from for thousands of animal species??

Anyone with a functional knowledge of permutations and statistics would immediately know that God is the creator of our spirit and He designed the DNA of our father and mother and thus God is behind what we look like and how we function!!!

In fact, the biggest problem in the evolution debate is that very few people have the mathematics background to understand the permutation issues relative to several million different species, many of which have both male and female DNA (more will be said about permutations below).


The Physical Constants

Let's talk about about the incredible "physical constants." Some of the 300+ physical constants have to be unbelievably accurate or our Universe could not exist!! How did the atheists deal with that impossible subject??

To explain how the physical constants came to exist by accident, one of the most famous atheists came up with the concept of "multiverse," and claimed that there were an infinite number of Universes (i.e. an infinite number of Big Bangs), but all of them failed to create life (except our Universe) because they did not have the right combination of physical constants.

You have to admire the atheists and evolutionists for their creative thinking!! But creative story-telling, and hundreds of PhDs, does not imply truth. In fact, it doesn't matter what is discovered, the vivid imaginations of the atheists and evolutionists can generate a story for every scientific fact!!

There may be an infinite number of Universes, but if so every one of them was made by God and every one of them has the right physical constants and every one of them has life in them.

What about the incredible "physical constants." Some of the 300+ physical constants have to be unbelievably accurate or our Universe could not exist!! How did the atheists deal with that impossible subject??

To explain how the physical constants came to exist by accident, one of the most famous atheists came up with the concept of "multiverse," and claimed that there were an infinite number of Universes (i.e. an infinite number of Big Bangs), but all of them failed to create life (except our Universe) because they did not have the right combination of physical constants.

You have to admire the atheists and evolutionists for their creative thinking!! But creative story-telling, and hundreds of PhDs, does not imply truth. In fact, it doesn't matter what is discovered, the vivid imaginations of the atheists and evolutionists can generate a story for every scientific fact!!

There may be an infinite number of Universes, but if so every one of them was made by God and every one of them has the right physical constants and every one of them has life in them.

This is an incredible list of the fundamental physical constants (i.e. the "fine-tuned Universe"), etc. These constants are one of the major reasons the theory of evolution has become complete, scientific nonsense. (Link to another website)
Article (MIT): Fundamental Physical Constants (11 pages)

Some of these constants are due to the "ether" or "aether" of Nichola Tesla, but physicists will never mention Tesla's name because Tesla could create free energy and they would lose funding from energy companies if they gave him the glory he deserved!!! This is yet another instance of "scientists" (as they call themselves) ignoring the truth for the sake of money or glory!!! For example, a Nobel Prize was given for the discovery of "Higgs Boson" (the God Particle). The "Higgs Boson" is nothing but another name for Tesla's aether!!!

Tesla was never given a Nobel Prize because he could create free energy, something which is forbidden by the powerful energy companies!!!

I could say a lot more but I won't.


Creation Science

"Creation Science" (a phrase many youth have never heard) is the claim that God lives and that all things, from the Big Bang to the DNA of an ant, had to be carefully planned, designed and executed by God or by others who were chosen and given authority by God. Yes, God designed and executed (or had someone else design and execute) the Big Bang. There may be countless Universes as space is infinite and has no bounds.

Let's talk a little about creation science. God is an intelligent force in nature - a very, very, very intelligent force!!!

My first college degree was in mathematics, so if I were asked to give my number one reason the theory of evolution cannot be true, I would reply with three words: "permutations of nucleotides." A "permutation" is a unique way of ordering a set of objects, in this case nucleotides. For example, the number of different ways that human male DNA could be sequenced (meaning the number of permutations) is 43,200,000,000!!!!

Only a very, very, very, very, very, very, very (insert the word "very" 10,000 more times) minute percent of these permutations would lead to a viable human being!!!

By comparison to the number of permutations of human DNA, the number of atoms in our Universe is probably less than 4500!!!!

It gets worse for accidents. For humans, there are actually three DNA strands which have 43,200,000,000 permutations - the DNA in the male sperm cells of the father, the DNA in the female sperm cells of the father and the gender-neutral DNA in the mother's ovum (i.e. egg).

And all three of these DNA strands (and this is true of all animals) must align with each other in an incomprehensible way!! So they not only have to be the same length, but subsections of the three DNA strands must align with each other!!! To say that this could happen by accident is purely insane!!!

When thinking about totally random sequences of nucleotides (if not intelligently sequenced and designed by God), the vast, vast, vast, vast majority of these would not yield a vaible human being or any other animal!!!

Consider that the DNA of EVERY ANIMAL on this planet is vastly more sophisticated than any computer program ever written by human beings!!!!! And every animal species has 3 DNA strands just like humans do!!!

In fact, if evolution were true, there would be trillions and trillions and trillions and trillions of dead animals (whose DNA was not quite good enough for survival and reproduction) and there still would not be a single living animal, not even a male mouse (much less a male mouse and female mouse). In order to create the several million species of plants, animals, etc. which have or do live on this planet, (i.e. roughly twenty-one million different functional DNA strands) our entire Universe would be full of dead plants and animals and there still would not be a living pair of animals!!

Welcome to the beginners guide to the vast, vast power of permutations!!!

It is actually worse than I just described. For example, suppose you were to create a single new DNA strand which sequentially and cumulative has the DNA from ALL SPECIES OF ANIMALS, WHICH HAVE TWO MALE AND ONE FEMALE DNA STRANDS, all species of plants, all species of insects, etc. on this planet!!! This DNA strand would have roughly one quadrillion nucleotides!!!!!

The permutations of this imaginary DNA strand would have 41,000,000,000,000,000 different ways of being sequenced!!!! Of course the vast, vast, vast (etc.) majority of these permutations would not create the several million species, male and female where applicable, that have lived or currently live on this planet.

In fact, I rank the NUMBER ONE REASON THE THEORY CANNOT BE TRUE to be the answer to this question: "Where are the Failures of Evolution?" If evolution, were true, because of the permutation issues, there would literally be vastly, vastly, vastly more partially complete animals (whose DNA was not good enough for the animal to be born and grow up to be adults) than there are atoms in a billion billion billion Universes like ours!!!!

Are you BEGINNING to grasp the significance of the sophistication of the massive numbers of unique DNA strands on this earth and the absurdity of claiming that accidents could have created any of them, much less all of them??

Let's talk more about the alignment of nucleotides issue.


Alignment of DNA Issues

Suppose you were given the task to write a massively complex computer program. But you were told to fulfill this assignment by doing the following:

Step 1) Using source code, write two MASSIVELY COMPLEX computer programs which are the same length after being compiled (i.e. the object code).
Step 2) Take the object code (i.e. the compiled code that the computer understands) of these two programs and align them together.
Step 3) Create a new computer program with this algorithm: for each bit, sequentially, use a random number generator to randomly select which of the two programs to pull the "bit" for that sequential bit.
Step 4) Then try to execute this new object code and see if you have created a new computer program (created by aligning the object code of the two original computer programs) which has features of both of the original programs.

Good luck. But that is precisely the way that nature creates the DNA for a baby from the DNA of its parents, except that there are three DNA strands.

Here is another fact: all of the scientists on this planet could not create a functional cell, with a functional DNA strand inside, from scratch (from raw elements on the Periodic Table)!! Also, this cell must be able to divide into two cells, each of which has a DNA strand. This means that during cell division, a copy of the DNA is made. Try to figure out how that is done.

But even if DNA strands could be created by humans, they could not intelligently sequence the nucleotides such that an animal could be created by millions or billions of cell divisions!!!

Here is a test of the integrity of those in the scientific community. If scientists claim that they can create two different DNA strands in a male (the DNA in the male sperm cell leads to a male baby and the DNA in the female sperm cell leads to a female baby) and the one DNA strand in a female (which is gender-neutral), then ask them to create the DNA and cells for an extinct species, such as the Woolly Mammoth, Dodo Bird or Mastodon!!

But there is another massive, massive issue. Scientists CANNOT CHANGE the DNA of one species, in thousands of different places, to create new DNA for a "new and improved" species!! This is the very foundation of the theory of evolution!!!!!!!!!!!

The entire foundation of the theory of evolution is the claim that one animal can "evolve" into a new and improved species!!!! But this means that the entire foundation of the theory of evolution is that the DNA of one species can be randomly changed into the DNA of a new species!!!

This claim is both physically and statistically impossible!!!!


Common Ancestors

The concept of "common ancestor" is totally based on the belief that DNA can be changed!!! For example, it is thought by many that humans have a "common ancestor" with chimpanzees (AKA: "Chimpanzee - Human Last Common Ancestor" or CHLCA) because some segments of DNA of chimpanzees and humans are very similar.

Thus, the reality is that humans and chimpanzees have a "common designer!!! When God designed the DNA for humans and chimpanzees He simply used DNA that he had already designed. I don't know whether He designed humans first or chimpanzees first. This method is common, for example, with those who design automobiles as they would occasionally use common parts from an old model car in the new model car. This saves money for the automobile manufacturer.

Or there could be other reasons God (or some of His children he assigned the task) used "common parts" on DNA.

The point is that the fact that DNA cannot be changed is VERY IMPORTANT when thinking about the claims of the atheists and evolutionists. This is just an example of how the atheists and evolutionists assume evolution is true.


Can New DNA Be Created From Scratch??

There are two categories if someone claimed that "evolution" (i.e. accidents) created a new species. First, the claim that new species (i.e. their DNA) are created from scratch, with their own new DNA, or second, the claim that new species, with new DNA, have DNA which was created by a modification to the DNA of a previously existing species.

In this section, let's talk about the creation of new DNA from scratch.

In order for "evolution" (i.e. "accidents") to create a new species, with brand new DNA, the new species must be created by nothing but accidents, with no intelligence whatsoever involved. Is this logical? Absolutely not!!

Since all animal species begin as a single fertilized egg, with DNA inside of the egg which controls cell divisions, evolution has no choice except to work at the DNA level!!! It is DNA that creates an animal, not the other way around!!

All of the scientists in the world, combined, could not create a new DNA strand from scratch, but even if they could they would have absolutely no ability to order/intelligently sequence the nucleotides on the new DNA!!

If evolution were true, and accidents could create massively sophisticated computer programs (like DNA), we could fire all computer programmers and use random number generators to simulate evolution in order to write new computer programs and to enhance old computer programs into new and improved computer programs which have new features!!

This is absurd as any computer programmer knows, yet this is precisely the claim of the atheists and evolutionists!!! Evolution is essentially a random number generator applied to more than a million unique DNA strands for more than a million unique species, many of which have both male and female DNA which must align in an incredibly sophisticated way!!

And the DNA of each and every animal, plant and insect on this planet is massively most sophisticated than any human-designed computer program on this planet!!!


More On The Male and Female Issues Related To Creating New DNA From Old DNA??

As a specific example of the claim that new DNA can be created from old/existing DNA, let us assume that evolutionists claimed that human DNA "evolved" directly from the DNA of Bonobos. What their actual claims are is not relevant to this discussion, the issue is whether the DNA of one species (e.g. Bonobos) can be MODIFIED to create the DNA for a slightly superior species or a massively superior species.

We will not cover the situation where a species which does not have a male and female can "evolve" into a species which has both a male and female (which is itself a major issue with evolution), rather we will discuss the "evolution" of a species with both a male and female into a superior species which has both a male and female.

In order for evolution (i.e. accidents) to create the DNA for a new species, by randomly modifying the DNA of an existing species (which has both a male and female), the accidental changes to the (old) male DNA and the (old) female DNA (as required by the theory of evolution) must be in the same sections of their DNA and the changes must happen in the same generation!!

All of the changes to the DNA do not have to occur in the same generation, but each SUBSET of changes must occur in the same locations and same generation. For example, there could be 50 changes to the male and female in each of 10 consecutive generations (for a total of 500 changes to the male and female). But each subset of 50 changes in each generation must include the same 50 changes.

As an example, the same new genes (male and female) must be in the same sections of their respective DNA so that their offspring (the new species) will have the new section(s) of their DNA from both their mother and father!! This is part of the alignment issues required by evolution.

But not only must the genes and other sections of DNA align between the male and female (as evolution is making changes to the DNA of both the male and female at the same time so the male DNA and female DNA will align with each other at all times), the morphing of the embryo algorithms sections on the DNA of the male and female (Note: this is my terminology for the sections of DNA which control the cell divisions of the baby) must also align because it is the morphing of the embryo algorithms that control the 30 billion cell divisions (in the case of humans) as the new baby is being made!!

By using the term "align" I do not mean that they have the same nucleotides. What I mean is that the FUNCTION of each section must align. For example, the sections of the DNA that contain the gene(s) for eye color, for a male and female, must align, but the eye color of the male and the eye color of the female do not have to be the same.

The alignment of the morphing of the embryo algorithms alone represents an issue so devastating to the theory of evolution that it would destroy the theory of evolution by itself!! For example, with human DNA, and the DNA of many other species, there are two gigantic computer programs (male DNA and female DNA) which are each massively more sophisticated than any human-designed computer program!!! How do these two computer programs align before, during and after the transition from an "old" species to a "new and improved" species??

To make a human baby, these two biological computer programs on two DNA strands (male and female) must align with each other so their offspring have features of both parents. Try doing that with the object code of two different computer programs!!

There is no way that the morphing of the embryo algorithms, on the father's DNA and the mother's DNA, would align with each other after a massive series of accidents (i.e. as "evolution" is trying to improve the DNA to make a new species)!! In addition, these changes must occur in the same timeframe and same location on this earth or the male and female would not find each other as the massive number of accidents (i.e. evolution) were happening.


Natural Selection

This subject has already been discussed above, so this section will be short and link to an article.

One problem with natural selection is that because of the discovery of DNA, it is impossible for any species to exist!! So there should not be any species to select from!!

Well, natural selection is true, but this article will go into great detail about why Natural Selection has absolutely nothing to do with evolution:
Article: Does "Natural Selection" Have Anything To Do With The Theory of Evolution?


Measuring The Damage Of The Theory of Evolution

While the theory of evolution versus creation science debate is heated, the debate is far more than academic because many students are victims of this battle!! As a result of the teaching of evolution in many schools, countless middle school, high school and college students have lost their belief in God or they may question their belief in God.

Fortunately, the damage done by evolution can be measured. Studies funded by the very well known evangelical creationist Ken Ham group have shown that most of the loss of testimony of God occurs in middle school and high school, not in college!! Ken Ham's conclusion, based on statistics, is that students are already gone by the time they get to college!!

But of course, those who still have a testimony of God when they enter college will have that testimony challenged in college depending on what courses they take.

I should also note that the evangelicals do not have the Pearl of Great Price of the Mormon church. Many things in the early chapters of Genesis were damaged over the many centuries between when it was written and today. The Pearl of Great Price exists largely to "fix" the damage done to the early chapters of Genesis.

Here is a link to the Ken Ham video: "Already Gone - Part 1"
YouTube Video: Already Gone

 


Detailed Articles On Specific Topics


Where Did God Come From??

If "evolution" cannot be true (for hundreds of reasons), then God must live. So it is common for someone to ask: "Where did God come from?" There is an article to answer that question. Most of this article uses quotes from the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints - the Mormons - and includes quotes on the nature of God:
Article: Where Did God Come From??


A Warning By God To Those Who Teach/Endorse/Force The Theory of Evolution On Students

It is unfortunate that in many school districts in the United States, and outside of the United States, the theory of evolution is taught (e.g. in biology classes) as if it were a proven scientific fact. Not only is the theory of evolution not proven, the theory of evolution is scientific nonsense as this website demonstrates over and over!! Yet many teachers endorse the claims for the theory of evolution in their classes!!

Because of the teaching of the doctrines of evolution in the classrooms countless youth, starting in middle school and continuing in high school and college, no longer believe in God and may no longer go to church (mentally and/or physically)!! The evolution debate is not an academic exercise to entertain people, it is a debate for the souls of men and women, boys and girls!!!!
Article: A Warning By God To Those Who Teach/Endorse/Force The Theory of Evolution To Students!!!


Join The Fight: Please Share This Website With Others!!

I cannot say this often enough: Please share this amazing website with 15 or 20 of your friends on social media (e.g. Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, Pinterest, etc.) and ask your friends to share this site with 15 or 20 of their friends on social media!! Also, please link to this website from your website!! JOIN THE FIGHT!!!!!

Until a few dozen people do these things this website might as well be classified as military-grade Top Secret because Google will rank this website very, very low on the totem pole!!


The Magnitude Of The Problems With The Theory Of Evolution

The above items, and more to come, are just a few of the hundreds of scientific reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true which are discussed on this website.

But I should emphasize that the MAGNITUDE of the reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true is simply beyond comprehension. The permutation issues of the DNA for several million species, many with both a male and female, alone would eliminate any chance that the theory of evolution is true. And the construction of DNA is another issue of such magnitude that the theory of evolution simply cannot be true.

Do not look at each reason the theory of evolution cannot be true as being equal with the other reasons. Some reasons are massive enough, by themselves, to make the theory of evolution completely ludicrous!!!

Now I want to make it very clear that many students have been fooled by the atheists and evolutionists. This is nothing to be ashamed of. The atheists have perfected the art of deception, they are well-organized, very well-funded and their deceptions are highly polished!!!

Atheists don't want a God to exist because a God would be massively smarter than they are. So most of them do everything in their vivid imaginations to pretend there is no God and to claim that everything in the Universe came to exist by pure chance. God is replaced by mindless accidents.


What Should A Student Do??

So what should a student do when they realize the theory of evolution is complete scientific nonsense (and I am just beginning)? It is definitely not advisable for a student to argue with their teacher, but there is nothing wrong with a student quietly going "online" and learning the truth about the absurdity of the theory of evolution because of the sophistication of DNA and the sophistication of the cells that the DNA resides inside of, among many other reasons (e.g. the physical constants and the Universe).

This website shows no mercy for the theory of evolution. Why should it? The theory of evolution is pure science fiction!! In fact, this website discusses hundreds of reasons that the theory of evolution cannot be true, meaning hundreds of reasons that accidents could not have created everything in the Universe, including what is on this earth that is not man-made!!

I can assure you that God is not pleased with people who teach that He does not exist!!! God loves His children (that includes you and me). But as our Father, God wants His children to know the truth. And just as importantly, God is a very forgiving God.


Evolution After The "First Living Cell"

Life on this earth had to start with a single cell. So let us first talk about the credibility of the "first living cell" theory as claimed by the atheists and evolutionists:
Article: First Living Cell

Evolutionists claim that the DNA of the first human male and the DNA of the first human female "evolved" independently over millions of years, from the same "first living cell," by a series of accidents called "evolution"!!!

How did the DNA of the first human father and the DNA of the first human mother "evolve" together from the "first living cell?" How was their DNA synchronized, species after slightly improved species, as the DNA of the males and females evolved independently for millions of years??

Here is the problem, suppose the male DNA evolved slightly faster than the female DNA evolved. Within many thousands of years of new species, their DNA would not align and they would not have been able to have any children that survived because their DNA was not compatible!!

Male DNA and female DNA had to be designed by God, for each species with a male and female!! Evolution could never have designed two massively sophisticated computer programs (DNA) that could be integrated together to create a third computer program (a baby). And evolution certainly could not have done it in the same time-frame and same locations on the earth.

Yet the atheists claim that evolution created male and female DNA for many species that have both a male and female. They must claim the male and female DNA "evolved" over the same time period (so they could mate as they slowly evolved over many generations) and they had to live in the same geographical area (also required so they could mate).

The evolution debate is not about science, it is about God. If you assume God does not exist, or if you believe God does not exist, you will likely believe in the theory of evolution no matter how absurd it is.

Unfortunately, many people who believed in God have been tricked into believing in evolution. In fact, that is the precise purpose of the highly sophisticated deceptions of the atheists and evolutionists (and I have only talked about a few of their deceptions) and why it is taught in most schools, but not all schools. In some schools, "creation science" or "intelligent design" is taught and in other schools there are disclaimers about evolution.

Biology is no longer about science, it is about creative thinking as to how every discovery can be attributed to the theory of evolution in order to get more converts to atheism. Atheists are not interested in truth, they are only interested in getting converts to atheism.

One of the key deceptions of the atheists and evolutionists, to get converts, is their definition of the term "species." They define the term "species" in such a way that each "variety" of dog is a different "species." To them a Chihuahua and a Great Dane are different "species." This gives them the latitude to claim that they have observed a new "species" form. But if the term "unique species" is defined to be a "unique DNA structure" then they have never seen a new "species" be created. Nor will they ever see a new species be created by accident or by human breeding of animals.

The atheists and evolutionists don't like to talk about DNA, they like to tell stories and use deception, such as by using very clever deceptive definitions.

Seven chapters in one of the free eBooks on this website are devoted to deceptive definitions.

In addition, the atheists must claim the entire Universe was created by accident!! How could the atheists and evolutionists claim that the entire Universe was created by accident instead of by God? Well, they had to come up with some "accident" that they claimed could create the Universe, including the superclusters of clusters of galaxies. So the atheists invented the concept of a purely accidental "Big Bang." They want you to believe that an accidental explosion (remember, it had to be an accident) created the Universe. I don't think so.


The Current Evolution Versus Creation Science Debate

The evolution debate should not be based on the visual forms of plants and animals (i.e. Darwin's phylogenetic tree), but rather it should be based on the probability that the DNA of the plants and animals (and the cells the DNA resides in) came to exist PURELY BY CHANCE (i.e. by the totally random accidents of evolution)!!

But what massively sophisticated computer program, and human DNA is the most sophisticated computer program on this planet, has ever come to exist by a long series of pure accidents?

Every DNA strand is claimed to have been created by accident and every computer program has been written by computer programmers (and the compilers were written by humans and the operating systems were written by humans), yet EVERY DNA strand is far more sophisticated than EVERY computer program!!

Suppose you were a spy and you were told by your country to steal the instructions of how to manufacture a certain kind of automobile. Would you take a photograph of the automobile or would you steal the schematics of the machines in the factory that made the automobile?? Obviously you would steal the schematics of the machines.

Likewise, debating the theory of evolution by looking at the visual forms of plants and animals is not scientific because it totally misses the root cause of why the plants and animals exist, which is DNA!!

The fact is that without DNA there would be no plants and no animals.

To be more specific, plants and animals are created by the computer algorithms which are on the DNA of the plants and animals. So looking at the visual form of a plant and animal is NOT looking at what causes the plant or animal to exist!!

Needless to say the atheists and evolutionists don't like to talk about DNA or cells, they like to talk about the visual form of each plant and animal so they can tell their stories. They carefully ignore the fact that computer programs in the human world are never written by random number generators, but evolution itself is essentially a random number generator applied to DNA!! Without God there is nothing but total randomness in nature.

The key question in the evolution debate is this: knowing that the "computer programs" on DNA in nature are vastly more sophisticated than any "human-designed computer program," how could the "computer programs" on DNA, for several million species have been "written" by totally random processes?

As will be seen many times on this website, when DNA is looked at during the evolution debate, the theory of evolution becomes scientific nonsense. By definition, there is "no intelligence" in the theory of evolution, especially at the DNA level.

The only "evidence" the evolutionists have for their theory is to ignore DNA and look only at the visual form of plants and animals and then combine the visual form of plants and animals with their exceptional story-telling skills.

Once DNA enters into the evolution debate the theory of evolution quickly collapses because all DNA is a massively sophisticated computer program, even for an ant.


Cell Biology (The Sophistication of Cells)

Suppose you were on a hike deep in the forest and you had not seen any sign of civilization for several hours. Suppose as you came over one hill you saw, what looked like to you, a brand new Buick automobile with its engine running and its headlights on and its hazard lights flashing.

Would you think that this "object" was created by an explosion in a forest?? Of course not. A forest is made of dirt, trees, shrubs, rocks, etc. You would know that what you were looking at was vastly too sophisticated to have been created by an explosion in the forest.

Yet, every cell in your body is massively more sophisticated than any automobile ever made!! To say that any cell was created by a series of accidents is ludicrous. Yet all plants, animals and insects are made from a collection of cells and each of those cells is more sophisticated than a Buick!!

In fact, all of the scientists on this planet could not create a single cell, even without the DNA that is inside of almost all cells. Nor could they create the many other things which are inside the cell that are part of the continuous activities going on inside of almost every cell. Nor could they figure out how to make a cell divide into two cells, including copying the Golgi Apparatus, for example.

Hundreds of scientists have PhD degrees in Cell Biology, so cells are not simple!! The large textbook Essential Cell Biology, Third Edition, has 8 authors and 730 pages plus many pages of other information!! The Glossary has 596 definitions!!! Cells are clearly not simple!!

By the way, the term "species" was not even defined in the book!! The term should be defined thusly: "a unique species is determined by a unique DNA structure." But if the atheists and evolutionists used this definition, the theory of evolution would crumble to the ground. This is precisely what so many atheists tap dance around a definition of "species."

Another textbook on Cell Biology is called: The World Of The Cell, Fourth Edition, by Becker, Kleinsmith and Hardin. This textbook is 845 pages. The term "species" does not show up in the Index.

There are clearly at least 100 reasons the theory of accidents cannot be true due to the sophistication of cells; and this does not include the many issues created purely by the DNA in almost all cells!! In fact, I own two books on this very issue (and I am sure there are other books on this topic):
Signature In The Cell - DNA and the Evidence For Intelligent Design by Stephen C. Meyer
The Cell's Design - How Chemistry Reveals The Creator's Artistry by Fazale Rana

These two men are obviously "creation scientists," meaning they believe that God had to create the many species on this earth because they could not have been created by accidents.


What is Life?

Let us look at the issue: "what is life?" For example, if you took a fish and left it out of the water until it died, and then an hour later you put it back into the water, why doesn't it come back to life? All of the raw elements for life are still in the fish, so why doesn't it come back to life? There is something more to "life" than just cells and oxygen and water.

Furthermore, have the evolutionists and atheists ever proven that life can be created from non-life (i.e. inorganic materials)?? Never, never, never - yet they continue to preach atheism.

While several attempts have been made to create life from non-life (e.g. Miller-Uray, Wong and Hartgerink), the scientists have not only failed to create life, they have also failed to prove it can be done. They cannot create a DNA strand from inorganic material, much less a DNA strand with a viable permutation of nucleotides for life which is inside of a cell!!

For example, have scientists put a large shell over a pond, which had no life, meaning there was no DNA and no cells (this simulates "prebiotic," meaning "existing before life"), and observed "life" form by a series of accidents, including RNA or DNA inside of a "first living cell" (in that pond), that was alive and had the ability to divide itself into two cells (which would be required for life to continue)?

Never!!

Then what is their evidence for evolution? Their only evidence is that many scientists do not believe in God and thus they have no choice except to use their God-given brains to deceive people into believing that everything in the Universe, including human DNA, occurred by chance.

But the theory of evolution should have been thrown in the trash can when DNA was discovered and when the complexity of cells was also discovered. Yet, as scientists learn more and more about DNA and cells, the atheists continue to cling to the theory of evolution as if it were still 1859, when Darwin's first book was published.

The only thing that is "evolving" on this planet is the theory of evolution as evolutionists/atheists constantly need to develop new spin to account for the new discoveries about the sophistication of cells, the morphing of the embryo algorithms on DNA, etc.


Can Accidents Or Simplicity Create Complexity?

As one example of complexity, the human eyes are unbelievable in complexity. Yet the sections on human DNA which create the human eyes must be far more complex than the eyes themselves!! And the intelligence who designed the DNA (God) must be far more complex than the DNA itself!!

In other words, simplicity never creates complexity. To understand these concepts, consider these items:

First, consider that a human-designed computer program exists because of the human intelligence to write the computer program, the human intelligence to write the computer language, the human intelligence to write the computer language compiler, the human intelligence to design and build the microprocessor, including designing and building the memory chips, etc.

Second, consider the output of the computer program which is printed on a piece of paper.

How can the printout on the piece of paper be more sophisticated than the human intelligence needed to write the computer program, to write the computer language, etc.?? It can't!!

Let's think about the memory chips. I have a son who works for a company that makes memory chips. At times he is sitting in a very large room by himself, with more than a billion dollars worth of equipment needed to make memory chips!!

The memory chips cannot be more complex than the machines that made them, and the machines that made them cannot be more complex than the humans who designed them!!

Simplicity cannot create complexity!!

Consider the sophistication of DNA such that it creates a person's brain. Let us think about a pianist.

A pianist must be able to convert thousands on dots on a sheet of music into the movements of their fingers!! To do this the DNA must create the nerves between their eyes and their brain, have the brain process these dots and then the brain controls their fingers. And the DNA must create the muscles on their fingers, etc.

If all of this is in place, and with thousands of hours of practice, a pianist can play the Rachmaninoff Piano Concerto #3!!

What created our DNA, which in turn created our brain, had to be far, far smarter than our DNA and our brain!!!

That would be God.

Accidents (i.e. evolution) have zero intelligence so how could accidents create something with intelligence? They can't!! Intelligence is a top-down process and someone a lot smarter than humans had to design human DNA and the DNA for every one of the several million species on this planet which have or do exist, many of which have a male and female.

Could accidents or monkeys design and build a Buick automobile? Of course not. It takes a lot of intelligence, including many different specialties, to build a Buick automobile. Only humans can build an automobile. Likewise, only God could create the DNA for several million species of plants, animals and insects.


Article: Where Did God Come From?

The truth is that God had to exist long before our Universe was created and our sun was created and this planet was prepared for earth life. So people naturally want to know where God came from!!

Brigham Young, who was born in 1801 (Darwin was born in 1809), the second prophet of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (the Mormons), said this about the first cause of all things (i.e. where God came from):

  • Many have tried to penetrate to the First Cause of all things; but it would be as easy for an ant to number the grains of sand on the earth. It is not for man, with his limited intelligence, to grasp eternity in his comprehension ... It would be as easy for a gnat to trace the history of man back to his origin as for man to fathom the First Cause of all things, lift the veil of eternity, and reveal the mysteries that have been sought after by philosophers from the beginning.

In other words, there was a "First Cause" of all things - a beginning - but this beginning happened so long ago, and so many quadrillions of things have happened since then, that these events are far, far beyond human comprehension.

By the way, the largest desert on this planet is 5.5 MILLION SQUARE MILES in size (the Antarctica Polar Desert)!! The Arctic Polar Desert is 5.4 MILLION SQUARE MILES in size!!

There are a lot of grains of sand on this planet for the ant to count!!

If Brigham Young had known these two facts, and other facts about deserts, I doubt he would have changed his statement.

  • "I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use."
    Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)

While Brigham Young did not know very much about the Universe in his day, he did understand the principle that the "first cause of all things" is beyond human comprehension.

Brigham Young also said this about God:

  • He is the Supreme Controller of the universe. At his rebuke the sea is dried up, and the rivers become a wilderness. He measures the waters in the hollow of his hand, and meteth out heaven with a span, and comprehendeth the dust of the earth in a measure, and weigheth the mountains in scales, and the hills in a balance; the nations to him are as a drop in a bucket, and he taketh up the isles as a very little thing; the hairs of our heads are numbered by him, and not a sparrow falleth to the ground without our Father; and he knoweth every thought and intent of the hearts of all living, for he is everywhere present by the power of his Spirit -- his minister, the Holy Ghost.

    He is the Father of all, is above all, through all, and in you all [see Ephesians 4:6]; he knoweth all things pertaining to this earth, and he knows all things pertaining to millions of earths like this.
    Brigham Young: 1998-1999 Priesthood/R.S. Manual - page 30
    Journal of Discourses, Volume 11, Page 41

This article is specifically about where God and the Universe came from:
Article: Where Did God And The Universe Come From?

Here is an article on astronomy (this is a new article and will be expanded as time goes on):
Article: Astronomy


A Summary and Overview Of Some Key Issues

So far we have barely touched the surface of the reasons evolution cannot be true, yet even at this point we have no logical choice except to conclude that God exists. Different religions may have different beliefs about God, but there is no choice except to say that God does exist. In the Mormon religion (the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints) there are three separate Gods in the Godhead. The head God (Heavenly Father), the Savior (Jesus Christ) and the Holy Ghost.

If scientists are so smart, and believe that God does not exist, can they create a Universe with a planet like Earth that has or had several million species, many of which have both a male and female? Let's think about it.

What is the difference between "creating" a brand new Buick versus "destroying" a brand new Buick by driving it over a cliff??

The difference is that the new Buick being driven off the cliff must have been created before it was driven over a cliff.

How does driving a Buick over a cliff help explain how the Buick got created in the first place?? It doesn't.

So how does finding the remains of an extinct animal (i.e. its fossil) tell us how it was created?? It doesn't. All it tells us is that this animal used to be alive, but now it is dead.

An animal must be alive before it is dead. A fossil does not tell us how an animal was created, it only tells us that the animal is dead.

But even extinct animals had to have DNA and their DNA had to create them either from an enclosed egg (e.g. a chicken egg) or a fertilized egg (e.g. humans or monkeys).

Every animal on this planet, including humans, came from a single DNA strand which was inside of an egg. Whether they came from an enclosed egg (i.e. a chicken egg) or a single fertilized egg in a mother, the animal (including humans) came from a single object and then morphed over time into what it was when it was young and eventually died.

So the evolution debate is not about where bones came from, it is about where DNA came from. How did "morphing of the embryo" algorithms come to exist for many, many complex species, especially when there is a male and female in the species?

The evolution debate is therefore about statistics. There are so many past and present highly sophisticated DNA strands for both extinct and living animals that the theory of evolution has become ludicrous.

But it is not just about the creation of DNA, it is also about viable permutations of nucleotides on DNA. Even if DNA could be built, the probability it has a viable permutation to create an animal from a single cell is mathematically insane.

It is far beyond the scope of this home page to talk about many subjects. But trust me: the probability of a viable permutation of nucleotides, to create both a male and female for a single advanced species (the permutation of nucleotides on the DNA would have to be almost perfect in order to perform the morphing of the embryo for both a male and female offspring), etc. is so ludicrous it could not happen a single time in the estimated age of this Universe or a billion consecutive Universes.

In summary, here are just a few reasons evolution (i.e. accidents) could never have created human beings:
1) Creating DNA from scratch (e.g. for the "first living cell") is impossible for many reasons (humans still cannot do it),
2) Creating a cell from scratch, by accident, is impossible for many reasons (the inside of a cell is like a small city) (humans cannot do it),
3) Creating life from non-life is impossible and has never been done (though it has been attempted),
4) Creating the mechanisms in the cell, which use the DNA as patterns to create proteins, is impossible to happen by accident. For example, how does this mechanism know WHERE on the DNA a specific protein code is located? Only 3% of DNA is coded for proteins (the "WHERE" issue is a topic by itself),
5) Obtaining a viable permutation of nucleotides on DNA, that could create a human baby, is statistically impossible. It would be far more likely to pick a single atom which is hidden among many, many quadrillions of Universes. This is NOT an exaggeration!!
6) And so on.

But even if scientists could create a cell from scratch, would their "new cell" be alive? The answer is 'no' because scientists don't have a clue what "life" really is.

So how did evolution create a living cell, with DNA or RNA inside, with a viable permutation, with the mechanisms to use the DNA patterns, by pure accident?? Accidents don't create intelligence, just ask any computer programmer how long it would take to write a complex computer program using code written exclusively by random number generators. It would never happen.

So if humans cannot design and create from scratch DNA or RNA, plus a cell for the DNA or RNA to exist inside, and give their new cell "life," with a viable permutation of nucleotides, why would anyone believe that a series of pure accidents (i.e. evolution) could have created the "first living cell" in a sterile pond?

Because that is what they hear in school and on YouTube.

The atheists and evolutionists are great story tellers but they are complete dolts at common sense and logic!!! Popularity and money outranks their brains.

Many reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true are mentioned in various other articles on this website, such as the "Twenty-Five Reasons The Theory of Evolution Cannot Be True" article.


The Evolution Debate

While there are more than 350 books which are favorable to the theory of evolution there are also more than 350 books which are strongly critical of the theory of evolution!!

There are also many YouTube videos on both sides of the debate.

Those who are critical of the theory of evolution are called "creation scientists" or "creationists" because they believe the scientific data favors a "Creator" of the Universe.

In fact, if you want to get published in a leading biology journal you better be an atheist and your article better support the theory of evolution. If it does not praise evolution your article will end up in the trash can, not in a "science" journal.

From the incomprehensible sophistication of DNA, to the amazing complexity of cells, to the earth we live on, to the ends of the Milky Way Galaxy, to the furthest galaxy cluster and supercluster (by the way, the supercluster we live in is called the Laniakea Supercluster), and considering the "constants" in physics (e.g. the gravitational constant); the credibility of the theory of evolution has dropped to ABSOLUTE ZERO!!!



Note: In order to prevent this home page from becoming massively too big, some topics, which would normally be put on the home page, have been moved to their own article.


More Detailed Articles On Special Topics


Article: Five Reasons The Theory of Evolution Cannot Be True

Please ignore this article, it exists solely for search engines, but it must be linked to somewhere:
Article: Five Reasons The Theory Of Evolution Cannot Be True


Article: Fifteen Reasons The Theory of Evolution Cannot Be True

While there are hundreds of reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true, this article is a list of fifteen of the best reasons evolution cannot be true plus this article digs much deeper into the DNA issues which destroy the theory of evolution:
Article: Fifteen Reasons Evolution Cannot Be True (Very Important To Read)


Article: Twenty Reasons Evolution Cannot Be True

This article was written at a different time than the "Fifteen Reasons" artcle so it has a little overlap, but is generally different.
Article: Twenty Reasons Evolution Cannot Be True


Article: Twenty-Five Reasons Evolution Cannot Be True

This article was written independently from the Fifteen Reasons and Twenty Reasons articles so it is a significantly different list.
Article: Twenty-Five Reasons Evolution Cannot Be True


Article: More Than Four-Hundred Reasons Why The Theory of Evolution Cannot Be True

Here is a list of more than 400 reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true. In each category one or more items are flagged that represent a significant reason evolution could not have happened by a series of accidents.
Article: More Than 400 Reasons Why The Theory of Evolution Cannot Be True


Article: Unlimited Reasons Evolution Cannot Be True

The number of reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true, which are discused in this article, will probably grow as time goes on, so this article does not have a specific number of reasons evolution cannot be true in its title. But right now it has far less than 400 reasons. But it does have some of the newer reasons.

In other words, this article will change from time to time as I come up with new and improved reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true. So it has a generic title. But this is an important article that will frequently have some of the best reasons evolution cannot be true.
Article: Unlimited Reasons Evolution Cannot Be True


Article: Kehr's Paradox #1 and Kehr's Paradox #2

Before looking at the two Kehr's Paradoxes, if you haven't already seen this article (which is actually a chapter in one of the free eBooks on this website) look at it now:
Book: Patterns of Intelligence - Chapter 18 - (Study All Bar Charts!!)

Both of Kehr's paradoxes demonstrate that if the nucleotides on any DNA strand were randomly chosen (as evolution requires), there is no way that real DNA could be the way that it is!! See this article which discuss these paradoxes:
Article: Kehr's Paradox


Article: Can Accidents Create New DNA For A New Species From The DNA Of An Existing Species??

This is one of the premiere articles on this website. It is one of the articles on why the DNA of one species cannot be changed into the DNA of a new and improved species, which is the very foundation of the theory of evolution after the discovery of DNA in 1953!!!
Article: Can Accidents Create New DNA For A New Species From The DNA Of An Existing Species??


Article: A Focus On Human DNA

Human DNA is the most sophisticated of all DNA strands because it is human DNA that creates the human brain (ignoring what our human spirit contributes to our intelligence), which is vastly, vastly more sophiticated than the brain of any other species.

Try to teach a chimpanzee or bonobo to read sheet music. In fact, many humans are not very good at reading sheet music, but all humans would be far superior to all chimpanzees or bonobos.
Article: A Focus On Human DNA


Article: The Hidden Agenda Of The Theory Of Evolution

There is far more to the theory of evolution than just a claim that there is no God. As this article shows, the hidden agenda of the theory of evolution is to create a mirror-image of the Gospel of Jesus Christ which is designed to pull people away from God!!
Article: The Hidden Agenda Of The The Theory of Evolution


Article: A Challenge To The Atheists and Evolutionists

The atheists and evolutionists claim that all DNA has be created by a series of accidents either from scratch or by the modification of an existing DNA strand.

This article poses a challenge to the atheists and evolutionist to prove their theories are credible:
Article: A Challenge To The Atheists and Evolutionists


Article: The Theory of Evolution Is A Religion!!!

The theory of evolution and atheism are identical!!! They are both religions of atheism.

This article goes into detail about how the leading evolutionists are atheists and their doctrines are designed to lead people to beome atheists!!

Woody Allen, Stephen Hawking, Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, etc. are all atheists who tout the theory of evolution as valid science so they can get converts to atheism!!
Article: The Theory Of Evolution Is a Religion


Article: The Use Of Clever Definitions

There is absolutely no scientific evidence to justify the theory of evolution. So what do the atheists and evolutionists do to generate bogus "evidence" for the theory of evolution??

One way is the use of very, very clever definitions, also known as "deceptive definitions." By using clever definitions the atheists and evolutionists can create "evidence" for the theory of evolution out of thin air, so to speak.

In other words, they can use a scientific fact which has absolutely nothing to do with the creation of new DNA (which is required for evolution to be true) and like a magician they can create imaginary evidence for the theory of evolution.

This article goes into more depth on this issue:
Article: The Trick of Using Clever Definitions By The Atheists And Evolutionists


Article: The Complexity of Cells (and 3 YouTube Videos)

There is human DNA inside of every cell (except some red blood cells), but human DNA is not the only highly sophisticated object inside the cells. There are many other complex objects, some of which were created by the genes on the DNA. Cells are unbelievably complex!!

In the book: Essential Cell Biology, Third Edition, a section header on page 410 reads: Transmitter-gated Channels in Target Cells Convert Chemical Signals Into Electrical Signals." This is not something you read in the comic section of the newspaper.

Cells could not have been created by a series of accidents!!

For more information about the complexity of cells, see this article:
Article: The Complexity of Cells (Includes 3 YouTube Videos!!)


Article: Could a Simple Cell Exist?

Evolutionists understand the problems with creating a human cell from scratch, so they claim that the "first living cell" was a simple cell and that numerous increasingly complex types of cells "evolved" between the "first living cell" and human cells.

First of all, there are no "simple cells." Even the simplest cell on this earth has DNA (except for some red blood cells, however, there is no way these red blood cells can divide!!) and inside each cell is also an incredible, miniature factory.

For more information about whether a simple cell could exist, see this article:
Article: Could A Simple Cell Exist?


Article: Comparing DNA to Computer Programs

Ponder this carefully: every one of the millions of complex, or even moderately complex, computer programs on this planet was written by human beings. NONE OF THEM were written by random number generators to simulate the way that evolution must work!!! Every computer program has been written by intelligent human beings who studied computer languages and programming!!

This article logically compares the existence of DNA to writing computer programs and explains why DNA could not have come to exist by accidents:
Article: Comparing DNA to Computer Programs


Article: Why Do We Need Computer Programmers??

The DNA for millions of different species are vastly superior to any computer program written by any team of computer programmers!!

So if randomness (i.e. evolution) created all of the most sophisticated computer programs on earth (i.e. DNA) then randomness should also be able to design the far, far less sophisticated computer programs used by businesses, the military, individuals, etc.

This article provides another viewpoint to the evolution debate:
Article: Why Do We Need Computer Programmers?


Article: Permutations - The Ultimate Death Of The Theory of Evolution

This article goes into much more detail about why permutations of nucleotides are among the ultimate deaths of the theory of evolution.

The permutation issue is so bad for the theory of evoultion that there literally would not be a single species, on this planet, or in the Universe, if there were not a God to design DNA.
Article: Permutations - The Ultimate Death Of The Theory of Evolution


Article: Pride Is The Driving Force Of The Theory of Evolution

This article details exactly why the theory of evolution exists!! The answer is pride!!! Many atheists and evolutionists cannot stand to think that someone might be smarter than they are, much less MASSIVELY smarter than they are!!
Article: Pride Is The Driving Force Of The Theory Of Evolution


Article: What Did Darwin Know?

Charles Darwin knew nothing about cells and he knew nothing about the DNA inside of those cells. In fact, based on what scientists knew in Darwin's day, the data that Darwin had access to fully supported his theory of evolution!! It was not until 1953, with the discovery of DNA, that Darwin's theories could be disproven!!

This article is actually in defense of Darwin based on what scientists knew in his day!!
Article: What Did Darwin Know?


Article: Is There Life On Other Planets?

Life on a planet must be created by God. This is a fact which is repeated many times on this website. The planet must have water, it must have an environment, etc. etc.

Many times on this website there is reference to the fact there is a God. To think that this puny planet would be the only planet in this Universe with life on it is absurd. This article digs into this issue.

Using scriptures and common sense this article concludes there is life on many other planets!!
Article: Is There Life On Other Planets?


Article: All Kehr Kids (For Those Who May Have Genetic Defects Which Cause Strokes)

It is very rare, but in some families strokes are common due to a genetic defect!!! There is no cure for this condition because it is genetic. However, by taking the correct supplements, blood clots can be continuously dissolved (hopefully). This is the BEST SOLUTION I KNOW OF FOR THESE KINDS OF GENETIC CONDITIONS!!!
Article: All Kehr Kids, Kehr Grandkids and All Other Liset Family Members...


 


The Two Free eBooks On This Website

Chapter Summary: Medium-size eBook (37 pages, pdf file): Patterns of Intelligence - Chapter Summary

If you want a quick, high level overview of the Patterns of Intelligence book, this article has a short summary of each chapter in the 266 page medium-size this book:
Summary: Patterns of Intelligence - Chapter Summary Only


Technical Medium-Size eBook: (266 pages, pdf file): Patterns of Intelligence

While the large book on this website is the "B-2 Bomber" of anti-evolution books, this book is the "F-22 Raptor" of anti-evolution books. This free book is actually much more current on the issues of the great scientific deceptions which are going on and the mathematical reasons evolution cannot be true. However, it does not go into the depth of the long book on the mathematical reasons evolution cannot be true.

Did you know that if you listed all major LDS doctrines (i.e. Latter-Day Saint or Mormon) and then took the opposite of each of these doctrines you would end up with the theory of evolution doctrines!! This book will produce such a detailed list in Chapter 2.

In this book you will see one of the main arguments of the large book, called "Patterns of Intelligence." This eBook has some really cool graphs.

But there are many things in the medium size book which are not in the large book. For example, chapters 22 and 23 of this book contain an amazing discussion which demonstrates that there is nowhere near enough information on DNA to control the "morphing of the embryo" algorithms!! Either God Himself designed DNA (and we cannot even remotely understand it) or the morphing of the embryo has help from the other side of the veil. There is no other option!!

Here is a link to the medium-sized book in one file. As always, you are welcome to read it online, download it, or print it out:
Free eBook: Patterns of Intelligence (pdf file)

Here is a link to the individual chapters in the medium-sized book. Each chapter is a file so it is easy to focus on one chapter at a time:
Free eBook: Patterns of Intelligence (pdf file for each chapter)


Technical Long eBook: (407 pages, pdf file): Prophets or Evolution - An LDS Perspective

This book is the "B-2 Bomber" of anti-evolution books. It demolishes the theory of evolution time after time and takes no enemies. The discovery of DNA has created an avalanche of ways to prove the theory of evolution is scientific nonsense.

This free eBook is available in both HTML and PDF formats and both versions can be looked at online or can be downloaded. For example, you can download the PDF version and print it out so you can mark it up. As always, you don't even need to tell me you downloaded it!!

The long eBook is called "Prophets or Evolution - An LDS Perspective," which:
1) Compares the doctrines of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (i.e. LDS church) to the theory of evolution (chapters 1-12),
2) Details many of the massive scientific problems with the theory of evolution (chapters 13-36).

The book in HTML format (by chapter):
Free eBook: Prophets or Evolution - An LDS Perspective (html version)

A printable version of the entire book (407 pages) is available in pdf format and can be read or downloaded from this link. It can also be printed out:
Free eBook: Prophets Or Evolution - An LDS Perspective (pdf file)


Chapter of Long Book: "Seven Scientific Reasons ... Evolution Cannot be True"

The complete "Prophets or Evolution" book is over 400 pages. This is a link to one of the key chapters in the main eBook. This chapter is a high level overview of seven of the main scientific reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true. It also mentions seven other reasons evolution cannot be true. Here is a link to this chapter:
Chapter: Seven Scientific Reasons the Theory of Evolution Cannot be True


Other Anti-Evolution Books

If you listen to the propaganda of the pro-evolution monopoly you might think that anyone who believes in creation science is a dolt. Nothing could be further from the truth. There are many "creation scientists" (i.e. those who believe God created this Universe) who are brilliant and have no problems seeing through the false science generated by the scientific establishment.

In fact, many anti-evolution books have been written by brilliant scientists. This listing of anti-evolution books and DVDs contains only a small sampling of the anti-evolution books which exist in print. In fact, there are more than 200 anti-evolution books.

Many of the books were written by PhDs in the sciences. The arguments in these books totally shred the theory of evolution from a scientific standpoint.

Some of these books may be out of print and you may have to use a book finder, such as Alibris, to find them.

Here is a link to this appendix:
Appendix: Books and Movies Against the Theory of Evolution

 


 

The Truth About Cancer And A Link To An Article on Cancer

It has been known since 1890 that cancer was caused by a bacteria!!! If you safely kill the bacteria inside a cancer cell the cancer cell will become a normal cell!!! One very gentle electromedicine device (Rife Machine) did absolutely nothing but kill these bacteria and had a very, very high cure rate. The newer Rife Machines (the GB-4000 devices) use newer high tech circuitry.

But natural cancer treatments can kill cancer cells, kill the bacteria inside the cancer cells, build the immune system, etc. A typical natural cancer treatment will have between 15 and 25 natural cancer treatments. Many of the natural treatments for cancer can be purchased at a health food store!!! But work with an expert because there are safety rules (e.g. about too much alkalinity).

Here is my point: CANCER IS NOT CAUSED BY DNA DAMAGE!!!! Cancer was known to be caused by a bacteria in 1890 (not a typo)!!! That is why some natural cancer treatments are designed to kill these bacteria so that the cancer cells will REVERT into healthy cells.

But the key to surviving cancer is to work with an expert who has a great deal of experience and knowledge about natural cancer treatments.

For adults who want to know about the experts in natural medicine or who want to prevent ever getting cancer (required if you are over 50), click on the link to this article:
Article: The Truth About Cancer - Cancer Is NOT Caused By DNA Damage!!!

That article about cancer also talks about natural treatments for AIDS and erectile dysfunction (use the Bob Beck Protocol as a minimum for both of these conditions).

If you want to know the truth about Big Pharma, copy and paste this into a browser:
site:www.whale.to Rockefeller

Here is my biography, which also has links to articles about cancer:
Article: Biography Of R. Webster Kehr

(My email address is camouflaged to avoid web crawlers)