Can Accidents Create New DNA For A New Species From The DNA Of An Existing Species??
This is an unbelievably complex article so it will probably need to be read 2 or 3 times.
The entire foundation of the theory of evolution is that there is no God and therefore humans (i.e. human DNA) "evolved" into existence from another primate (e.g. human DNA evolved from the DNA of another primate, such as a bonobo or chimpanzee).
In this article we analyze whether human DNA could have "evolved" from bonobo DNA. But the issues would be the same if we chose any other primate as humanity's ancestor species.
There are really three major subcategories when talking about a new and improved species "evolving" from an existing species.
First are physical reasons. It is simply impossible for a DNA strand, inside of a cell, to be mutated into the DNA of a new species (especially when both male and female DNA are involved). An article on this subject is called: Changing The Length Of A DNA Strand By Evolution/Accidents Is Impossible and is linked to near the bottom of this page.
Second are mathematical issues (specifically: permutations of nucleotides) which make the theory of evolution mathematically absurd. This article is also linked to near the bottom of this page and is called: Permutations - The Ultimate Death Of The Theory Of Evolution.
Third are mathematical issues related to the fact that all animals require three types of DNA strands:
The above three types of DNA must align at the function level (i.e. they must be exactly the same length and, as one example, the section where the liver is created for the new species must align on all 3 DNA strands). This is an insane requirement for the roughly 10 million animal species which have existed, or currently exist.
However, in order to create a new species from an old species, four new and improved DNA strands are needed!! For example, if humans evolved from bonobos; to create at least one male human baby and one female human baby for the new human species, these DNA strands are needed:
Items 1, 2 and 3 will create a male human. Items 1, 2, and 4 will create a female human. Items 3 and 4 are the same thing, they are just used to create a different human: one a male and one a female. The DNA in the ovum must align to both male and female DNA. In fact, all of these DNA strands must align with each other in order to create a new animal species.
And all alignments must occur at the function level, such as the creation of the liver during cell divisions as the new human babies are morphing from a single fertilized egg into a new baby (i.e. it is not enough that the new male and female human DNA are just the same length)!!
Because the DNA on all four DNA strands (male and female) in any new species must align with each other; special problems result when the DNA of the new species is longer (or even shorter) than the DNA of the existing species. In this article we will assume that humans "evolved" from bonobo and we will assume (and this is probably correct) that human DNA is at least one million nucleotides longer than bonobo DNA (this is very conservative).
I have not found a reference for how long bonobo DNA is, so the one million number is only for teaching purposes.
In the beginning, all 4 bonobo DNA strands must align with each other (at the function level) and in the end, all 4 human DNA strands must align with each other (at the function level).
The problems which will be discussed involve creating these four new human DNA strands by accidents (i.e. by evolution).
For example, one issue is the mathematical probabilities, such as the issue of creating and aligning four new DNA strands from four existing DNA strands by evolution (i.e. by the purely blind, directionless accidents of evolution).
Specifically, this article will discuss whether four DNA strands of a bonobo (or pick any other primate you want) can randomly (i.e. by blind, deaf and dumb accidents) "evolve" into the four DNA strands needed to begin the human race.
And remember we will assume that human DNA is longer than bonobo DNA. The choice of bonobo DNA (as the ancestors of humans) is arbitrary; different people might pick different primates to be the ancestors of humans. But the issues are exactly the same no matter what primate people might claim that human DNA "evolved" from!!!
Remember, because the atheists and evolutionists claim there is no God to perform these tasks, the creation of a new species from an old species must be done entirely by a series of accidents!! Thus, in order for accidents to create a new species from an old species, four DNA strands of an existing species must be able to be ACCIDENTALLY changed into four human DNA strands for a new and improved species - humans!!
And just as importantly the four new DNA strands, for the new human species, must align with each other at the function level (e.g. the sections where the liver is created via cell divisions must align with each other).
Defining Other Key Issues
In order to create the new human species, with a male and female, from an existing bonobo species, four human DNA strands are needed to create the new human species (i.e. both a male and female human baby need to be created in order for a new species to exist):
To create the first male human:
To create the first female human:
And the correct male human and the correct female human must mate. This must be done twice, whether the father and mother are the same is not important, only that a correct human mother and a correct human father have the correct random mutations must mate in each case.
Note that from among all of the sperm cells (potentially thousands) in the male bonobo, the ones that reach the ovum first must be the ones that were randomly changed by pure accidents!!! This is another layer of statistical problems for evolution.
All four of these modified bonobo DNA strands (to create four human DNA strands) must exist in order for a male and female human to be created so the human race can begin.
Note that all four of these new human DNA strands (which are modified bonobo DNA strands) must align with each other at the function level so that the human race can begin with a male and female!!! This is because when the first male human baby and the first female human baby grow up to have their own children, their DNA must align with each other (if evolution is true).
Note: These same concepts apply to the creation of any new animal, not just humans.
As already mentioned, we will assume that one million changes (to each of four bonobo DNA strands) will be needed to create the human race. This is very, very conservative. I don't know how long bonobo DNA strands are but human DNA is 3.2 billion nucleotides long. So we are probably incredibly generous to the theory of evolution (which is OK because evolution has so many other problems).
In summary, what needs to happen is that four bonobo DNA strands (two from one male [if both human children have the same father] or two from two different males [if the two human children have different fathers] and two from one female [if both children have the same mother] or two from two different females [if both children have different mothers]) need to be randomly mutated into four new and improved human DNA strands which align with each other at the function level (in order for the new human species to exist four human DNA strands will be needed).
Thus, if we assume that humans "evolved" from bonobos (or any other primate) then four bonobo DNA strands need to have roughly a million changes (as assumed above) in the same locations on their DNA.
The changes to the DNA strands do not need to be made in the same sequence, only the end-result has to be correct.
And all of these changes must be made by blind, deaf and dumb accidents (as claimed by the atheists/evolutionist) so that new and improved DNA strands (e.g. for humans), both male and female, can be made!!!
And these changes to the four DNA strands must happen very, very quickly so the new human male and the new human female can exist in the same latitude, longitude and timeframe so they can eventually mate and have their own offspring.
I do not know how long bonobo DNA is, but since we don't know which primate humans evolved from, the "one million changes" turns out to be far more important than which primate humans evolved from.
And we haven't really emphasized the fact that DNA includes a computer program which is beyond human comprehension (the "computer program" is needed to control the cell divisions during the execution of the morphing of the embryo algorithms on the DNA of all animals). In other words, the computer programs to control cell divisions in the bonobo must be changed into new computer programs to control new sequences of cell divisions needed to create humans.
Let me repeat that: when making the above changes to create a new species, the "computer programs" on DNA (which control cell divisions), on all four DNA strands just mentioned, need to be changed into new and improved computer programs in order to create a new and improved species from an old species via a new and improved sequence of cell divisions which convert a fertilized egg into a baby via millions or billions of cell divisions!!! This is a gigantic, colossal "can of worms" for the theory of evolution!!
Why does the sequence of nucleotides need to be vastly improved? As one example, a human has a vastly superior brain than a bonobo.
Thus, the morphing of the embryo algorithms on the four new and improved human DNA strands must be able to create the massively superior human brain!!!
So it is not just about changing four DNA strands, it is about massively improving four DNA strands!!!
In other words, the reason a human is a human and a bonobo is a bonobo is the section on DNA which controls the sequence of cell divisions as a single fertilized egg morphs, via cell divisions, into a baby and eventually into an adult.
A bonobo can climb a tree far better than a human to get away from predators, but a human can design a rifle with ammunition to kill potential predators from long distances away!!
Imagine how many changes to four bonobo DNA strands would be needed to create the human species!!?? A million is very, very conservative, but it is not just the length of the DNA that is important, it is its sophistication!!!
After all of this, the female bonobo (or bonobos) must give birth to a male human baby and a female human baby!! And the bonobo parents must not kill their funny-looking babies (funny-looking to them, but we call these babies: humans). Not only that, but after the bonobo parents have two human babies, they must nurture these funny looking babies until the two new humans can survive on their own and have their own children to start the rest of the human race (that would include you)!!!
And the conversion of the DNA of a bonobo into human DNA (as an example) would require THE SAME MILLION OR MORE RAZOR-SHARP, PRECISE CHANGES TO ALL FOUR DNA STRANDS OF THE BONOBO MOTHER AND FATHER IN THE SAME GENERATION so the new humans could mate!!
The Death Of The Theory Of Evolution
In all that has been said we have not made any assumption about how many generations of bonobos it would take to make the 1,000,000 changes to four DNA strands to begin the human species. Let us randomly pick the number 1,000 generations.
Here is another major problem with evolution: the four evolving bonobo DNA strands MUST ALIGN WITH EACH OTHER IN EACH OF THE 1,000 ASSUMED GENERATIONS OF CHANGES WHICH MUST BLINDLY MAKE THE 1,000,000 CHANGES TO FOUR BONOBO DNA STRANDS.
That last paragraph needs to sink in, but it is one of the death knells of the theory of evolution!!!!!
So we not only have to deal with one million precise changes, we must deal with one-thousand subsets of these one millions changes. And these one thousand subsets of changes to bonobo DNA must be perfectly synchronized in each of the 1,000 generations of converting bonobo DNA into human DNA.
As a mathematical would say about the death of the theory of evolution: Q.E.D. (quod erat demonstrandum) [as was to be shown]
Could Humans Modify Bonobo DNA into Human DNA??
"Evolution" is nothing but accidents (if you don't understand this read the home page of this website).
All of the scientists on this planet could not sequence the nucleotides of a DNA strand to create an ant, much less a bonobo or human!!! Yet these same scientists, who claim that evolution is true, must explain how the DNA for about ten million species of animals (nine million of which are extinct) - which would require 40 million highly sophisticated DNA strands (one DNA strand in the male's male sperm cells and one DNA strand in the male's female sperm cells and two gender-neutral DNA strands for the female ovum which may be identical but they still have to created independently of each other) - were all created by accidents!!!
As I say on other articles, if the atheists/evolutionists/scientists claim they could do this, to make sure they don't cheat I would ask them to create the four DNA strands to reconstruct the Woolly Mammoth or Dodo Bird or some other long-extinct species.
Link To Article: Changing The Length Of A DNA Strand By Evolution/Accidents Is Impossible
A companion to this article is equally critical in explaining why the DNA of one species cannot be changed into the DNA of a new and improved species. This next article deals DIRECTLY with the physical problems of changing the DNA of one species into the DNA of another species.
Let us take a test to see if you understood that key article:
First, a segment of DNA, inside of a cell, cannot be removed from the interior of a DNA strand!! To do this would require the DNA strand to be broken in two places and then the two endpoints would need to be rejoined (this is not possible because there is nothing inside the cell that can rejoin the rails of a DNA strand).
Second, a segment of DNA, inside of a cell, cannot be inserted into the cell's DNA strand!! To do this would require the DNA strand to be broken in the interior in one place and a new segment of DNA would need to be inserted into the new "slot." But inserting this segment would require the joining of the DNA with the new segment in two different places (i.e. the two endpoints of the inserted segment). This is another "rail" issue.
Plus, where did the new DNA segment to be inserted (which must be created inside the cell by nothing but accidents) come from??
Link To Article: Permutations - The Ultimate Death Of The Theory of Evolution
See also this article about massive mathematical reasons that humans cannot have "evolved" from bonobos:
Note the comments that if the theory of evolution were true, there would be more failures of evolution (i.e. more dead and deformed animals, whose DNA was not good enough to create a viable animal), than there are atoms in this Universe and a trillion trillion trillion other Universes!!!
After reading the article on this page and the articles just linked to, even a high school student should be able to figure out that the theory of evolution is false (the DNA for a new species cannot be created from the DNA of an old species) because of the discovery of DNA. A "new species" (i.e. a new and improved DNA strand) simply cannot be created due to the "rail issue" and other issues inside the cell. There is simply no mechanism inside the cell to make the kind of "fixes" that the theory of evolution requires. Plus, statistically the theory of evolution is pure nonsense because evolution is nothing but accidents.
Click the back arrow or if you came to this page by a search engine, click this: Home Page