The First Book To Describe the Theory of Evolution Was NOT Written By Charles Darwin

Darwin's first and second books about evolution were published in 1859 and 1871, respectively. The theory of evolution exists to get people to believe in evolution. No one knows what was going through Darwin's mind, or what goals he might have had in mind, but one thing is clear, his two books created a lot of atheists!!!

That is precisely why Darwin was so afraid to publish his first book. He knew people would claim he was an atheist because his books convinced many people to believe that humans "evolved" from less sophisticated species and that God had nothing to do with it. This means his goal was to convince people that the wonders of nature were not a proof of God.

Whether this makes Darwin an atheist of not, makes no difference, he knew his books would convince people that God did not create the plants and animals on this planet!!! And he also know that when people believed that, they very well could become atheists.

His first book in 1859 was so well received that he wrote a second book in 1871!!!

God certainly considered Darwin to be an atheist even before Darwin wrote his first book!!! The Book of Mormon was published in 1830 and the Book of Mormon anticipated the coming forth of Darwin's theory of evolution in three different places!!! The Book of Mormon could not use the term "evolution" because that word probably did not exist in upstate New York in 1830 where the Book of Mormon was first published.

The Book of Mormon strongly supports a belief in Heavenly Father, Jesus Christ, living prophets, etc. and it was very much AGAINST the theory of evolution even before the theory of evolution existed!!! It was against the theory of evolution (in 3 places) precisesly because the theory of evolution, whether admitted or not, creates a lot of atheists regardless of Darwin's motives.

The fact that the Book of Mormon discussed the theory of evolution in three places means that God was and still is very concerned about the influence of the theory of evolution on His children, both in and out of the Mormon church. Everyone is a child of God no matter what religion they belong to. God is gracious enough to warn people about His thoughts!!

But note that the Book of Mormon was not reacting to the theory of evolution, it was proactively predicting and rejecting the theory of evolution was coming in three different places, in 1830, more than a century before DNA was discovered!!!

This article will talk about the three sections of the Book of Mormon which predicted the coming forth of the theory of evolution.


A Little About Mormon Doctrine

In the Mormon church the Godhead consists of three separate Gods: Heavenly Father, Jesus Christ and the Holy Ghost. These are the three separate Gods in the Godhead.

Most religions believe in a Heaven (for those who are good and/or righteous) and a Hell (for those who fall short of being admitted into Heaven).

The Mormon religion (Officially: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints) has more categories than just Heaven and Hell. Everyone who has ever lived on this planet, or who will live on this planet, will fit into one of these five categories after Judgment Day:

1) The Celestial Kingdom, where God dwells. This wonderful place is for those who die before the age of 8 and for the righteous, but the Celestial Kingdom is subdivided into categories. For some religions this place is for those who are "born again," but this event is not recognized in the Mormon church. Mormons must keep the commandments as best they can and "endure to the end." Well, there is a lot more to Mormonism than that (such as "eternal marriage") but this is not an article on Mormonism.

2) The Terrestrial Kingdom, a geat place for very good people who do not meet the standards of the Celestial Kingdom.

3) The Telestial Kingdom, not as bad as you might think, but it is for those who do not meet the standards of the Terrestrial Kingdom. Murderers almost always fit into this category, but there are many, many others who fit into this category.

4) "Like Unto the Son of Perdition", this category will be discussed below, but very few people, perhaps a few hundred, and most of the people (if not all) in this category will not be members of the Mormon church. It is almost never mentioned in the church as it is not really for church members.

5) Son of Perdition, the King Follett Discourse of Joseph Smith effectively states that only members of the Mormon church, who have a strong testimony of the church, and then turn on the church and persecute the church, might fit into this category so it is rarely mentioned in the church. It is an ETERNAL punishment. Here is the original King Follett Discourse:
Speech of Joseph Smith: King Follett Discourse


Other Preliminary Comments

As implied above, the first book to describe the theory of evolution was the Book of Mormon, which was published in 1830, which was 29 years before Darwin's first book. There are actually three places in the Book of Mormon where the theory of evolution is discussed. These three places are what this article is about.

Among other things, the Book of Mormon was PREDICTING the theory of evolution was coming in three different places!!!

The Book of Mormon is a religious history book, like the Bible, but was written by ancient prophets, most of whom lived in the Americas. The Book of Mormon covers a period of time from the Tower of Babel to about 400 A.D. Christ is a prominent figure in the Book of Mormon and after His resurrection He actually appeared to many of the people, in the Americas, who lived at that time (34 A.D.)!! And he has appeared to other prophets both in Book of Mormon times and modern times.

The three groups of people in the Book of Mormon were called: the Nephites, the Lamanites and the people of Ether. Most of the people mentioned in the Book of Mormon lived in what we now call: South America and Central America with the exception of those discussed in the Book of Ether, who settled in North America.

There are NO descendants of the Nephites and there are NO descendants of the people in the Book of Ether!! All of them were wiped out except Ether (the Book of Ether) who eventually died or was translated and Moroni (a Nephite), who eventually died or was translated.

The Lamanites survived and ultimately became the people of South America, Central America and the American Indians.

This article is about the predictions in the Book of Mormon about the future (i.e. relative to 1830 when the Book of Mormon was published) coming forth of the theory of evolution.

The Book of Mormon not only discusses the theory of evolution in three chapters, one of these chapters includes a massive warning to those who, for profit, mock the miracles of Christ, such as the resurrection!!! Examples would include authors who write pro-evolution books and/or pro-atheism books, lectures or debates for which they are paid, and who mock the miracles in the Bible (e.g. raising the dead, healing the sick, the resurrection of Christ) either by Christ Himself or by His followers (e.g. Peter).

The phrase: "shall become like unto the son of perdition, for whom there was no mercy" should attract the attention of those who are thinking about following in the footsteps of Dawkins and others!!

Authors who will likely fit into the category of the warnings, in my opinion, include Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, Daniel Dennett, Peter Singer, the late Christopher Hitchens and hundreds of others, all of whom are atheists and/or evolutionists who have mocked the miracles of Christ and have written books for profit or given lectures for profit, etc.

Note that the Book of Mormon, published in 1830, talks about people who are alive today and describes some of the things they write about!!

No doubt some of the people the Book of Mormon talked about in 1830 have not even been born as of this writing (2017)!!

The Book of Mormon can be read online at this link (specific references to relevant Book of Mormon versus will be given below):
The Book of Mormon Online

In addition to the three sections which talk about the theory of evolution, there is a section below about modern apostles and what they have said about the theory of evolution (they obviously reject the theory of evolution).

So let's talk about the three sections in the Book of Mormon which rejected the theory of evolution decades before Darwin's two books introduced evolution to the World!!


First: The Book of Mormon - Alma 30

The first account where evolution is discussed can be found in Alma 30 in the Book of Mormon:
Book of Mormon - Alma 30

As can be seen in this account, the person who taught the doctrines of natural selection and evolution (i.e. that there is no God) in the Book of Mormon was Korihor, who in turn was taught these doctrines by satan himself!!

Because of Korihor's preaching, he became an enemy of the church of Christ and he was struck dumb by one of the prophets mentioned in the Book of Mormon, Alma the Younger. The events the Book of Mormon discusses happened about 74 B.C.

So while the Book of Mormon introduced the theory of evolution (without using the term "evolution" which probably did not exist in 1830), the Book of Mormon was very critical of the theory of evolution 29 years before Darwin published his first book about evolution!! And the Book of Mormon was published more than 120 years before DNA was discovered, which was the first time that the theory of evolution could be disproven.

Did you note that Korihor was called the "anti-Christ?" No doubt part of the reason Korihor was called the "anti-Christ" was because he taught that God did not exist (Alma 30:28, 37-38, 43, 48, see: 52-53) and that Christ would never be born (Alma 30:6, 12-13, 15, 23, 26) and he taught that Adam and Eve never existed (Alma 30:25), meaning they were not created by God. He also taught natural selection in three different ways in the same verse (Alma 30:17).

So what is wrong with teaching natural selection? As is mentioned on this website multiple times, natural selection is an elimination process, not a creation process. So natural selection has nothing to do with creating a new species.

Satan taught natural selection to Korihor because at the time (before the discovery of DNA) it may have appeared that natural selection was evidence for evolution. In fact, Darwin coined the phrase: "evolution by natural selection." However, we now know that natural selection is purely an elimination process and in NO WAY is it a creation process. But in 74 A.D. someone might have believed it was a creation process.

The point is that all of Korihor's doctrines (i.e. satan's doctrines) were, item by item, exactly the opposite of the doctrines taught by the prophets in his day (74 B.C.), such as Ammon and Alma the Younger. All of the other enemies of the church mentioned in the Book of Mormon taught a mixture or truth and error. But everything Korihor taught was the opposite of the truth.

The reason everything Korihor taught was the opposite of the doctrines of Christ was that Korihor was also the only enemy of the church who was taught his doctrines by a personal appearance of the devil!! (Alma 30:42, 53)!!

This may explain why Korihor was also the only enemy of the church who was commanded to be struck dumb by a prophet of God, Alma the Younger (Alma 30:49-50).

Let us ponder why satan would care about whether Korihor believed in Adam and Eve.

Before we were born on this planet, meaning before Adam and Eve were put on this planet, there was a war in heaven.

The war in heaven effectively started with what is called the Grand Council. All of us, including anyone reading this article, was at the Grand Council (that includes YOU!!)

Study this article carefully:
Article: The Grand Council

Note that the four key people at that meeting were Heavenly Father, Christ (Jehovah), Adam and Lucifer (i.e. now called the devil). You were there too as I just mentioned!!

Now consider this quote from that article:
"Michael, the archangel (who on earth was called Adam), led the "forces" of Jehovah in a battle for the loyalties of the Father's spirit children." The article does not mention this, but when God cast Lucifer out of Heaven, it might have been Michael who implemented the Father's command. But in any case, Michael and Lucifer knew each other very, very well!!

Michael would later become Adam, who, along with his wife Eve, were the first parents on this planet. All of us are descended from Adam and Eve on every line of our genealogy.

But here is where I am going: Satan/Lucifer hated Adam for multiple reasons!! So it would make perfect sense that the theory of evolution (which was taught to Korihor by satan himself) would reject that Adam and Eve ever existed!!

Think about it: if the theory of evolution were true, we humans would be descended from bonobos or Chimpanzees or some other primate. One of the major purposes of the theory of evolution is to REJECT that Adam and Eve ever existed!!! But this is not an accident, it is part of the design of satan!!

The great prophet Alma the Younger described Korihor's doctrines as being designed so that "[the devil] may destroy the children of God" (Alma 30:42). This was Alma the Younger's description of the goal of what we now call: the theory of evolution!!

As if being struck dumb was not enough, Korihor was soon killed by a wicked people. Satan does not support his top missionaries when he is done using them!!!

Alma 30:59 And it came to pass that as he [Korihor] went forth among the people, yea, among a people who had separated themselves from the Nephites and called themselves Zoramites, being led by a man whose name was Zoram—and as he went forth amongst them, behold, he was run upon and trodden down, even until he was dead.

Alma 30:60 And thus we see the end of him who perverteth the ways of the Lord; and thus we see that the devil will not support his children at the last day, but doth speedily drag them down to hell.

Note very carefully that when satan is done using someone, he quickly drags them down to hell!!

Well, it is more complicated than that because of the "spirit world," but I won't go into that.

Note also that the theory of evolution was taught personally by satan because it is satan's perfect doctrine!!! It is a mirror-image of the doctrines of the prophets including eliminating a belief in God, Christ and Adam and Eve!!!

Now you will better understand the punishments I will discuss below.

Alma chapter 30 is a prophesy about the coming forth of the false and anti-Christ doctrines of the theory of evolution and is a warning to members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (i.e. LDS church, Latter-Day Saint Church, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints or Mormon church), and to all others, about these false doctrines!!

In summary, Korihor had several unique characteristics:
1) He was taught his doctrines by a personal appearance of the devil,
2) He taught that there was no God and that Christ would not be born (he taught about 74 B.C.),
3) Every doctrine Korihor taught was exactly the opposite of the doctrines of the prophets (e.g. Alma the Younger),
4) He taught the concept of "Natural Selection" in three different ways as if it were part of evolution (which it is not) (Alma 30:17),
5) He taught that Adam and Eve never existed (Alma 30:25),
6) Korihor was commanded to be struck dumb by a prophet of God - Alma the Younger (see: Alma 30:46-60)!!
7) Korihor then admitted that the "devil" had deceived him (verse 53), but it was too late.

The modern day "Korihor's" (e.g. Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, Daniel Dennett, the late Christopher Hitchens, Peter Singer, and hundreds of others) are not much different than Korihor.

The Book of Mormon is accepted as official doctrine of the Mormon church (i.e. the LDS church)!!

Furthermore, other official scriptures of the LDS church teach that God created the heavens and the earth and that God also created Adam and Eve as the world's first humans after God created plants.


Second: The Book Of Mormon - 3 Nephi 29:5-7

The second account where evolution is discussed can be found in 3 Nephi 29:5-7 in the Book of Mormon:
Book of Mormon - 3 Nephi 29:5-7

5 Wo unto him that spurneth at the doings of the Lord; yea, wo unto him that shall deny the Christ and his works!

6 Yea, wo unto him that shall deny the revelations of the Lord, and that shall say the Lord no longer worketh by revelation, or by prophecy, or by gifts, or by tongues, or by healings, or by the power of the Holy Ghost!

7 Yea, and wo unto him that shall say at that day, to get gain, that there can be no miracle wrought by Jesus Christ; for he that doeth this shall become like unto the son of perdition, for whom there was no mercy, according to the word of Christ!

The punishment of becoming "like unto the son of perdition" sounds like a MASSIVELY STRONG PUNISHMENT!!! Whether it is an eternal punishment or not I do not know.

Examples of the miracles of Christ in the scriptures include healing people in many ways (such as restoring sight to the blind), raising the dead and above all, the resurrection of Christ and after Christ, the resurrection of many others (i.e. Christ was the first to be resurrected).

The apostles also performed many miracles.

It is interesting that the Book of Mormon, published in 1830, makes prophesies which are being fulfilled, over and over again, in the twenty-first century.

Heavenly Father loves His children, and anyone who tampers with their testimonies regarding God, for profit, could be putting themselves in harms-way on Judgment Day!!

Do not forget the punishment for those who fall into this category - they may become: "like unto the Son of Perdition" (verse 7). This cannot be a good thing!!

What happens to a member of the church who fits into the category of "like unto the son of perdition?" Could they end up being a "son of perdition" if pushing the theory of evolution, whether for gain or not, would qualify him as "fighting against the church?" That is purely God's call as the decision is made on a case-by-case basis, but I certainly would not want to be in the situation where I was even remotely a candidate for either place!!!!


Let Us Pause And Reflect On 3 Nephi 29:5-7

Before going on, the versus in 3 Nephi that we just talked about need more explanation. The scriptures, like the Book of Mormon, are not like the IRS Tax Code!!! The job of the IRS tax code is to consider every situation and provide an answer of the government for each situation. The IRS tax code is massively, massively longer than the versus we just talked about, yet the punishment just mentioned is much greater than anything the IRS can do to someone!!

Because a person does not meet the exact criteria of the above verses, like Richard Dawkins does, does that mean this person can ignore the above scriptures??

The answer is NO!!!

I should note that Richard Dawkins was born in 1941. The Book of Mormon was published more than 110 years before Richard Dawkins was even born!!!! That should get his attention, but I am sure it will not.

It is not the intention of the scriptures to talk about every possible person and every possible scenario relative to the youth and even adults of a church. It is extremely well known and proven that the theory of evolution, as taught in school (beginning in middle school) can severely damage the testimonies in God of the youth of the LDS or any other church!!!

For example, carefully watch this YouTube video by Ken Ham and the Part 2 video as well:
YouTube Video: "Already Gone" by Ken Ham

The teachers who do the damage that Ken Ham talks about are nothing like Richard Dawkins, so will they get off scot-free on Judgment Day??

The scriptures teach principles and leaves it up to the reader to determine how they may apply to them!!!

For example, what about a high school biology teacher who worships and praises Richard Dawkins and the late Christopher Hitchens, etc. in their classroom?? The students hear over and over again how smart and wonderful people like Dawkins are. To some degree, is not the teacher indirectly ridiculing the miracles of Christ??

Or to put it another way: is the school teacher, and school administrator, who on a face-to-face basis with students, knowingly destroys the testimonies in God and His prophets of their students, not just as guilty as Richard Dawkins, the late Christopher Hitchens, etc.?? In terms of quantity, no, but that does not mean they will get off scot-free on judgment day!!!

There are likely many degrees of guilt between a high school biology teacher who knowingly shoves the theory of evolution down the throats of their students versus the professionals who write books, give speeches, etc. which are designed to mock others who believe in God (e.g. Richard Dawkins is the poster child of those who do this).

What a person needs to do is ask the question: WHAT IS THE MESSAGE of Alma 30 and 3 Nephi 29:5-7??? The message is that God does not like people who knowingly and intentionally damage the testimonies of God that youth and many others have!! Those who knowingly destroy the testimonies of others may have a very, very, very bad day on Judgment Day!!!

The scriptures are not what God uses to judge people. The scriptures PROVIDE CLUES as to the way that God thinks (not that we could comprehend the way that God thinks).

Some people will become "like unto the son of perdition" or it would not be mentioned in the scriptures. But what the scriptures don't say is that others may not become "like unto the son of perdition," but yet there may be very, very serious ramifications for the damage they have done to the youth of any church.

Whether the person damages the testimonies of millions of students or scores of students in their classroom, does God not know what is going on???

Remember, the scriptures are not like the tax code. The scriptures teach principles. It is not the intent of the scriptures to describe the punishment and reward of every type of person on this planet. The scriptures are teaching tools. As we read the scriptures we should constantly be asking ourselves: "why are these versus in the scriptures and how could these versus apply to me?"

My point is that just because a school teacher does not technically fit into the versus that Richard Dawkins fits into, does not mean there will not be some ramifications by God for intentionally leading astray the youth they are responsible for!!!

This could not only apply to teachers, but also to school administrators and even the administrators at a state-wide level. Trust me on this one, it applies all the way to the Congress, the Supreme Court of the United States, etc.!!! Yes, judges will be judged by God.


Third: The Book of Mormon - 1 Nephi 8

Consider these versus in 1 Nephi 8: (the prophet Lehi is speaking)

10 And it came to pass that I beheld a tree, whose fruit was desirable to make one happy.

11 And it came to pass that I did go forth and partake of the fruit thereof; and I beheld that it was most sweet, above all that I ever before tasted. Yea, and I beheld that the fruit thereof was white, to exceed all the whiteness that I had ever seen.

12 And as I partook of the fruit thereof it filled my soul with exceedingly great joy; wherefore, I began to be desirous that my family should partake of it also; for I knew that it was desirable above all other fruit.

13 And as I cast my eyes round about, that perhaps I might discover my family also, I beheld a river of water; and it ran along, and it was near the tree of which I was partaking the fruit.

14 And I looked to behold from whence it came; and I saw the head thereof a little way off; and at the head thereof I beheld your mother Sariah, and Sam, and Nephi; and they stood as if they knew not whither they should go.

15 And it came to pass that I beckoned unto them; and I also did say unto them with a loud voice that they should come unto me, and partake of the fruit, which was desirable above all other fruit.

16 And it came to pass that they did come unto me and partake of the fruit also.

17 And it came to pass that I was desirous that Laman and Lemuel should come and partake of the fruit also; wherefore, I cast mine eyes towards the head of the river, that perhaps I might see them.

18 And it came to pass that I saw them, but they would not come unto me and partake of the fruit.

19 And I beheld a rod of iron, and it extended along the bank of the river, and led to the tree by which I stood.

20 And I also beheld a strait and narrow path, which came along by the rod of iron, even to the tree by which I stood; and it also led by the head of the fountain, unto a large and spacious field, as if it had been a world.

21 And I saw numberless concourses of people, many of whom were pressing forward, that they might obtain the path which led unto the tree by which I stood.

22 And it came to pass that they did come forth, and commence in the path which led to the tree.

23 And it came to pass that there arose a mist of darkness; yea, even an exceedingly great mist of darkness, insomuch that they who had commenced in the path did lose their way, that they wandered off and were lost.

[Note: The "mist of darkness" would have included any false teachings which are anti-prophet, anti-God and/or anti-Christ doctrines.]

24 And it came to pass that I beheld others pressing forward, and they came forth and caught hold of the end of the rod of iron; [Note: the "rod of iron" would have been any true doctrines (e.g. there is a God) as taught by the prophets.] and they did press forward through the mist of darkness, clinging to the rod of iron, even until they did come forth and partake of the fruit of the tree.

25 And after they had partaken of the fruit of the tree they did cast their eyes about as if they were ashamed.

26 And I also cast my eyes round about, and beheld, on the other side of the river of water, a great and spacious building; and it stood as it were in the air, high above the earth.

27 And it was filled with people, both old and young, both male and female; and their manner of dress was exceedingly fine; and they were in the attitude of mocking and pointing their fingers towards those who had come at and were partaking of the fruit.

28 And after they had tasted of the fruit they were ashamed, because of those that were scoffing at them; and they fell away into forbidden paths and were lost.

29 And now I, Nephi, do not speak all the words of my father.

30 But, to be short in writing, behold, he saw other multitudes pressing forward; and they came and caught hold of the end of the rod of iron; and they did press their way forward, continually holding fast to the rod of iron, until they came forth and fell down and partook of the fruit of the tree.

31 And he also saw other multitudes feeling their way towards that great and spacious building.

32 And it came to pass that many were drowned in the depths of the fountain; and many were lost from his view, wandering in strange roads.

33 And great was the multitude that did enter into that strange building. And after they did enter into that building they did point the finger of scorn at me and those that were partaking of the fruit also; but we heeded them not.

34 These are the words of my father: For as many as heeded them, had fallen away.

Note: While these versus talk about different ways to describe false doctrines and popular doctrines, it is certain that the teaching of the theory of evolution would be a significant part of the "mist of darkness" mentioned above, since the Book of Mormon clearly discusses the theory of evolution in other places as shown above!! While these versus do not specifically talk about Judgment Day there are certainly stong implications for Judgment Day.

Did you notice the phrase: "they were in the attitude of mocking and pointing their fingers towards those who had come at and were partaking of the fruit." God does not like to be mocked and He does not like His followers to be mocked!!

And as is mentioned in other places, the doctrines of the theory of evolution are a mirror-image of the doctrines of the Latter-Day Saint (Mormon) church!!



Modern Apostles In The Mormon/LDS Church Who Have Been Critical Of The Theory of Evolution

Not only is the Book of Mormon critical of the theory of evolution, even modern-day apostles and prophets have been critical of the theory of evolution.

President Russell M. Nelson, President of the Quorum of the Twelve, described the absurdity of the theory of evolution with a question: "Could an explosion in a printing shop produce a dictionary ... [that could] heal its own torn pages or reproduce its own newer editions?"
"Thanks Be to God," Ensign, April, 2012

President Nelson is basically asking: "How could a gigantic, accidental explosion [i.e. an accidental Big Bang], and a massive number of mindless accidents [i.e. evolution], have created the DNA strands [i.e. dictionaries] of many thousands of complex species of plants and animals (and many species have the ability to heal some of their own wounds); where each species came to exist by random, accidental mutations to DNA?"

President Nelson was not asking a question, he was making a statement: "evolution could not have happened."

He is correct, randomness has never created anything highly complex; but human cells, and the DNA inside of those cells, is far, far beyond incomprehensible complexity and sophistication!!

President Nelson is not the only apostolic critic of the theory of evolution among the top leaders of the LDS church. Elder Jeffrey R. Holland is another apostle who has been openly critical of the theory of evolution. This is a quote of his from a speech at Brigham Young University:

  • "But of course not everyone agrees that religion does or should play such an essential role in civilized society. Recently the gloves have come off in the intellectual street fighting being waged under the banner of the “New Atheists.” Figures like Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, Daniel Dennett, and the late Christopher Hitchens are some of the stars in what is, for me, a dim firmament. These men are as free to express their beliefs—or, in their case, ­disbeliefs—as any other, but we feel about them what one Oxford don said about a colleague: “On the surface, he’s profound, but deep down, he’s [pretty] superficial.” https://speeches.byu.edu/talks/jeffrey-r-holland_religion-bound-loving-ties/

Every person Elder Holland mentions (and hundreds of others) easily qualifies to become "like unto the son of perdition," but only God can make the official determination and only God can grant forgiveness to those who ask in faith and sincerity!!

The principle is that God clearly does not like people damaging the testimonies in the Godhead of the youth (and adults) of the LDS church or any other church!!


The Bible: Matthew 18:6

The Bible also has a warning to the atheists and evolutionists in Matthew 18:6:

6 But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.


Do You See The Pattern??

I don't know which is worse: being "drowned in the depth of the sea" (Matthew 18:6) or becoming "like unto the son of perdition" mentioned in the Book of Mormon above. They may be different ways to say the same thing (i.e. they are saying the same thing but their audiences are very different so their statements are very different)!!

All of the above scriptures and comments make it clear that God does not like people damaging the testimonies in God of others. The difference is that the "like unto the son of perdition" has specific criteria and a specific punishment which lasts after death and perhaps for a great many years after death.

But in all of the above cases, the key point is that God does not like people tampering with the testimonies of others, especially youth who do not have the background to see through many false doctrines!!!

Korihor learned the hard way that God loves His children. Many others will also learn that lesson the hard way!!


To Get To The Home Page Of This Website

If you came to this page from another page on the Prophets Or Evolution website, such as the Home Page, just close this window.

If you came to this page from Google, here is how to get to the home page:
Home Page of the Prophets Or Evolution Website