Fifteen Key Reasons Why The Theory Of Evolution Cannot Be True

Where did the Universe come from? Where did the DNA for more than a million different species come from, many of which have both male and female DNA? Where did cells come from?

There are only two options to answer these questions: God or accidents. That is it, there is no other option.

If the answer is "accidents" then these accidents are called the "theory of evolution." The "theory of evolution" should actually be called the "theory of accidents," because that is what it is, if it were true. But evolution is not true!!

The claims of the theory of evolution are so absurd (as this article will point out) the theory has to be riddled with deceptions of various kinds in order to get converts to atheism. These deceptions are designed to distract attention from the overwhelming quality and quantity of reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true. One article on this website mentions more than 400 reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true.

But this article only contains fifteen of the best reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true. But first I want to talk about three of the major deceptions of the atheists and evolutionists.

First, as is clearly mentioned on the home page of this website and above, the "theory of evolution" should really be called the "theory of accidents." With the discovery of DNA in 1953, it was discovered WHY a dog is a dog and WHY a cat is a cat and WHY a horse is a horse and WHY a human is a human, etc. The reason is DNA. DNA contains the instructions to create a dog, or a cat, or a horse, or a human, etc. from a single fertilized egg via millions or billions of cell divisions!!

The theory of evolution is the claim that "accidents" created the sophistication of the DNA for more than a million species. Such a claim is total nonsense for many reasons. Much of this article is about these reasons.

Second, is "natural selection." Natural selection is commonly used as "evidence" for the theory of evolution. This is absurd!! Natural selection is an elimination process whereby a weak species is eliminated by a stronger species. Natural selection is true but it has absolutely nothing to do with the creation of a new species, which is the heart and soul of evolution.

Third, has to do with clever definitions. By using clever definitions the atheists can use examples of variety within the same species, (i.e. microevolution), such as different species of dogs, and claim this variety is caused by "evolution." But a bulldog and a Great Dane have exactly the same DNA structure and thus should be part of the same "species"!! But frequently the atheists will claim they are different species (as an example) and that they are examples of evolution.
Article: Clever Definitions

Microevolution should be the term involved when two animals have the same DNA structure and macroevolution should involve two animals with different DNA structures. But this terminology will never be accepted by the atheists. They need to use examples of microevolution so they can pretend that there are examples of the theory of evolution.

In other words, there has NEVER been an example of macroevolution observed and there never will be!!

But accurate definitions will never happen because the only "evidence" the atheists have for evolution involve deceptive definitions.

One of the free eBooks on this website needs seven chapters to sort out the deceptive definitions of the atheists/evolutionists!!

While there are hundreds of reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true which are mentioned on this website, here are fifteen of the best reasons the "theory of accidents" cannot be true. You will see DNA mentioned many times.


Fifteen Key Reasons The Theory Of Evolution Cannot Be True

First, all of the scientists on this planet could not create a human DNA strand from scratch!!!! So how did "accidents" (i.e. evolution) create human DNA, horse DNA, cat DNA or even the DNA of an ant.

Scientists should take a box of dirt, sand and water and using nothing but the dirt, sand and water (to simulate pre-life conditions on this planet) create a human DNA strand from scratch. They should only be allowed to quit this project when they admit that the theory of evolution is nonsense.


Second, DNA is an ordering or sequence of nucleotides (A, C, G, T). The sequence of nucleotides determines whether a new baby will be a baby horse, a baby human, a baby cow, a baby deer, a baby hamster, etc. A bar chart of randomly chosen DNA (e.g. a bar chart created by evolution) does not look like a bar chart of real DNA!!!

Study all of the bar charts on this page and pay close attention to which bar chart was created by random numbers (e.g. the way evolution works). This page is actually a chapter taken from one of the free eBooks on this website: "Patterns Of Intelligence." Study each of the bar charts and what each bar chart represents. You will see that DNA was NOT CREATED by a series of accidents:
(PDF File - Will Open In Its Own Window) Chapter With Bar Charts Which Demonstrate That Accidents Did Not Create DNA


Third, is an extension of the Second reason. Even if scientists could create a DNA strand from scratch, they would have NO CLUE how to put the nucleotides in an ordering (i.e. a permutation or sequence) that could create a human baby.

Just like the ordering of '0's and '1's in a compiled computer program determine what the computer program will do, the ordering of nucleotides (A, C, G and T) on a DNA strand determine what kind of animal will be created, from a single fertilized egg, via millions or billions of cell divisions, by the instructions on that DNA!!

That is so massively critical to understand, let me repeat it:

Just like the ordering of '0's and '1's in a compiled computer program determine what the computer program will do, the ordering of nucleotides (A, C, G and T) on a DNA strand determine what kind of animal will be created, from a single fertilized egg, via millions or billions of cell divisions, by the instructions on that DNA!!

DNA is literally the most sophisticated computer program on this planet, but any computer programmer would tell you that you cannot create a new and improved computer program by randomly changing the object code (i.e. compiled code) of an existing computer program!! Nor could you create a new and improved computer program by randomly changing the existing source code of a computer program!!

This same concept applies to DNA because you cannot randomly change the nucleotides on a DNA strand inside of a fertilized human egg and expect a Superman baby!! This is because DNA is many, many, many times more sophisticated than any computer program written by human beings.


Fourth, the DNA must not only contain the compiled computer programs, it must also contain the ABILITY TO EXECUTE that computer code!! While scientists may understand how the cell uses the genes on the DNA, for example, scientists have zero clue on this planet how the cells implement their "morphing of the embryo" algorithms!!!

For example, the ordering of the 3.2 billion nucleotides (A, C, G, or T) on human DNA is so sophisticated that a single cell, with a single DNA strand, namely the fertilized egg inside of a mother-to-be, has the intelligence on the DNA to create an entire baby, via 30 billion cell divisions, who has 30 billion cells and 60,000 miles of blood vessels, etc.

The blood vessels of this tiny baby would wrap around the earth, at the equator, twice, with 10,000 miles of blood vessels left over!!

The baby will also have a beating heart, a liver, an incredible brain, etc. And all of this sophistication came from the instructions embedded on a single DNA strand inside the fertilized egg in the mother, followed by 30 billion cell divisions!!

The evolutionists claim that a series of mindless accidents (i.e. evolution) can create the computer algorithms on human male DNA (in his sperm cells) and human female DNA (in her egg/ovum). And they also claim that this series of accidents can randomly put these nucleotides in an ordering such that via 30 billion cell divisions a human baby will be born with 30 billion cells and 60,000 miles of blood vessels.

What have the evolutionists been smoking?? Try writing two massive, massive computer programs and then try to align their object code to create a new computer program that is a mixture of the original two computer programs!! It would never work!!

Scientists have only decoded 2% of human DNA so they certainly could not even begin to order the nucleotides on a new human DNA strand to create a human baby!! And if humans have only decoded 2% of human DNA, how did the "theory of accidents" (i.e. evolution) create human DNA from scratch, including the sequence of nucleotides??!!


Fifth, where are the failures of evolution? There are 1090 atoms in this Universe, but there are 43,200,000,000 different ways that a DNA strand can be sequenced (i.e. ordered) but the vast, vast, vast majority of these permutations would NOT create a viable human baby.

And that is just for human DNA!!! There is unique DNA for every species of plants and animals on this planet.

Accidents (i.e. evolution) would create vastly, vastly, vastly more failures in the attempt to create the DNA for a human baby than there are atoms in the Universe. This means our entire Universe would not be big enough to hold all of the failures of evolution just to create a single human DNA strand!!!

Also note that the order of nucleotides on the DNA of the first human couple according to the Bible, Adam and Eve, had to be able to create at least one male baby and one female baby (so the human species could perpetuate - and this applies to all species which have both a male and female) God had to create:
1) male sperm cells with DNA for Adam,
2) female sperm cells with DNA for Adam,
3) an egg (with DNA inside) for Eve,
4) DNA for at least one plant (so Adam and Eve had something to eat)

So four highly sophisticated DNA stands had to be created, in the same timeframe and same latitude and latitude, in order for human life to begin and perpetuate!!


Sixth, the TIMING and SEQUENCE of cell divisions which are built into the "morphing of the embryo" algorithms on DNA. These algorithms are essentially computer programs that control how a single fertilized egg becomes a new human baby with about 30 billion complex cells each of which must end up in just the right place at just the right time (i.e. they are created in the right sequence) and have the correct genes activated!!

Here is a video of the morphing of the embryo of a human baby. As you watch this YouTube video remember that a human being starts out as a single cell with a single DNA strand (the fertilized egg). This incredible 9 1/2 minute video by Alexander Tsiaras graphically shows the "morphing of the embryo" of a human baby, which is controlled by DNA and no doubt by the spirit of the child:
YouTube Video: "From Conception to Birth" (i.e. the "Morphing of the Embryo")

The video mentions that at 4 weeks, 1 million cells a second are being made and at birth a newborn baby has 60,000 miles of blood vessels. The sequence of these cells is also critical because, for example, if these blood vessels were not fully enclosed before blood started to circulate in the fetus, the fetus would bleed to death!! So the "timing" or "sequence" of the creation of these cells is critical!!

How could evolution ever accidentally create that level of sophistication?? If a new species was not able to enclose all of the thousands of miles of blood vessels before the blood started to circulate, every baby of that species would die and the species would immediately die off.

As if that weren't incredible enough, the instructions for the morphing of the embryo come from inside the cells, where the DNA is!! Cells divide from the inside-out. And remember each cell has exactly the same DNA, yet each of the 30 billion cells ends up in a unique location, in the correct sequence, with a specific set of genes activated.

Another issue is this paradox: "which came first, the DNA or the cells?" Cells cannot exist without DNA and DNA is useless without being inside of cells.


Seventh, are two major reasons you cannot create a new species from an old species, which is called "speciation."

The first reason is that once DNA is constructed, it cannot be changed, it can only be damaged!! If you understood how DNA is constructed, this would be obvious. What this means is that you cannot take an existing DNA strand and randomly modify its structure (to create a new species) because to do this you would have to cut the DNA strand. But if you cut or break a DNA it is impossible to connect the segments back together because of the way that DNA is constructed!!

These things mean you cannot create a new species, with new DNA, from the DNA of an old species.

This means neither you nor Mother Nature can modify a DNA strand and then put it back together to create a new species. DNA simply cannot be modified because of the way it is built.

In fact, all of the scientists in this world could not cut a DNA strand in half and then put it back together. It would be far worse than cutting a thread in half and then trying to glue the two pieces back together thinking the thread would be just as strong.

DNA cannot be changed once it is made!! Sections cannot be added, changed or deleted. In other words, the DNA for a new species cannot be created by humans or by evolution (i.e. by accidents) by modifying the DNA of an existing species because DNA would not survive any modification!!!

This is because of the physical construction of DNA. The structure of DNA is like a ladder. If you cut a ladder in half could you put it back together? Maybe you could, but you could not put a DNA strand back together.

What this means is that the DNA for EVERY SPECIES on this planet had to be created INDEPENDENTLY FROM SCRATCH!! Only God can create a new DNA strand!!

That is so important let me repeat it:

The DNA for EVERY SPECIES on this planet had to be created INDEPENDENTLY FROM SCRATCH!! Only God can create a new DNA strand!!

For example, male human DNA and female human DNA could not have been created by mutating the DNA of a male and female ape. Ape DNA cannot be modified, it can only be damaged.

Anthropologists love to claim that humans descended from apes or some other primate because humans have some common feature with these primates. These claims are total nonsense precisely because DNA cannot be changed because of the way it is made.

The second reason you cannot create a new species from an old species is because all DNA is like a massive computer program. Thus, in order to convert an existing species into a new species, it would be like taking the object code of an existing computer program and RANDOMLY MODIFYING THIS OBJECT CODE and expect to end up with the object code of a new and improved computer program, which has new features.

Any computer programmer would laugh at such a suggestion, yet that same computer programmer may claim that new DNA (which is far more sophisticated than any computer program) can be randomly modified to create new and improved DNA for a new and improved species.


Eighth, are specific issues related to species with a male and female. All of the scientists on this planet, and on millions of other planets, could not create human DNA, for a male and female, from scratch, which was sophisticated enough to create a single human baby.

Scientists could not even design the DNA for a male hamster and a female hamster, such that this pair of hamsters could have offspring which could in turn have offspring. And scientists certainly could not do it for two humans.

For humans, the DNA inside of a male sperm cell will lead to a male baby and the DNA inside of a female sperm cell will lead to a female baby. But the DNA of the sperm cell must align with the DNA in the female egg so that their offspring will have features of both parents!!

This alignment and sophistication, which is one of the major reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true, could not have happened by a series of accidents.

For example, the genes on the male DNA must be in the same order and align with the genes on the female DNA, yet the male DNA must lead to a male baby and the female DNA must be able to create a female baby.

The DNA for every species of plants and animals on this planet had to be designed and created by a massively intelligent Designer.

Obviously a new unique DNA structure, to create a new species with both a male and female, simply could not have be created by a series of accidents, meaning by evolution.


Ninth, ponder this next paragraph very carefully:

If you added the length of DNA for one of every species of plants and animals on this planet, male and female where applicable, the total number of nucleotides would almost certainly add up to more than 1 quadrillion nucleotides. Yet there is zero evidence of failures in the design of the DNA for any plant or animal. Furthermore, mutations are very, very rare. Furthermore, animals which have serious mutations generally die or at least cannot have offspring.

As if that were not enough, the number of permutations of this 1 quadrillion long DNA strand, and the unbelievably rare number of viable permutations, add even more absurdity to the theory of evolution. The number is 4 raised to the power of 1 quadrillion!!

The comments in the prior two paragraphs contain the MOST IMPORTANT reasons the theory of evolution cannot be true!!!!

DNA was also designed by God to allow a great deal of variety within the same species (e.g. within the same DNA structure, such as a Boxer dog and a Chihuahua dog). The world would be a very boring place if there was only one kind of dog and only one kind of horse, etc.

The vast number of species on this planet, each with unique DNA by definition, and many with both a male and female, is easily the number one reason the theory of evolution cannot be true!! And if evolution were true, the entire Universe would be filled with dead animals whose DNA was not perfect enough!!


Tenth, all of the scientists in the world could not create a cell for DNA to reside inside!! Hundreds of scientists have PhD degrees in Cell Biology or Biochemistry, so why would anyone claim that cells were created by accident?

As one example, if the cell needs a specific enzyme then the cell will use a pattern on the DNA called a "gene," to create the enzyme. But scientists would not have a clue where each gene begins except that the DNA provides ways to find where genes begin (e.g. "promoters"). But even that is not the full answer because DNA is coiled up so tightly that every cell has a DNA strand that is seven feet long. This coiling of DNA makes finding a gene that much harder. The sophistication of DNA is simply beyond human comprehension.


Eleventh, consider that when the fertilized egg in the mother divides, the new baby consists of only two cells. When these two cells divide there are four cells. The four cells become eight cells and the eight cells become sixteen cells. Let us ponder these sixteen cells.

These sixteen cells should be identical to the fertilized egg, but they are not identical!! If they were identical to the fertilized egg the baby would have 16 heads, 16 hearts, 32 arms, 32 legs, etc. But that is not what happens. Each of the 16 cells leads to a different set of cells which integrate with each other!!

How is it possible that these sixteen cells create sixteen different sets of cells in the baby and these sixteen sets of cells merge together perfectly!! See the "When There Are Sixteen Cells During the Morphing of the Embryo" article which is mentioned on the home page:
When There Are Sixteen Cells During The Morphing Of The Embryo


Twelfth, the atheists and evolutionists claim that a "first living cell" formed by a series of accidents in a "warm pond" billions of years ago. Before there was any life on this earth our planet would have consisted of nothing but water (and even water would not exist if there had been a Big Bang - the heat from the Big Bang would have evaporated any water), sand and rocks.

How could a living cell form from nothing but water, sand and rocks?? And how could life be created from non-life? Scientists have never created life from non-life, and they have tried.


Thirteenth, is the fact that life on this planet almost certainly could not exist, certainly human life, were it not for the phytoplankton in the oceans. It is phytoplankton that provides between 50% and 90% of the oxygen on this planet.

See this web page for more information on phytoplankton:
Phytoplankton Article


Fourteenth, is dirt. If the Big Bang had happened there would have been no dirt (i.e. no soil) on this planet. This planet would have been made of giant rocks. But no dirt. So where did water (which would have evaporated from the heat of the Big Bang) and dirt come from? Plants could not exist without water and dirt first existing. So the dirt could not have come from plants breaking apart rocks.

In other words, plants cannot exist without dirt and dirt cannot exist without plants.


Fifteenth, is the creation of a new species FROM SCRATCH!! Suppose that an artist draws a picture of a new species which has never existed on this planet and one which has both a male and female.

All of the scientists on this planet could not create two NEW DNA STRANDS, one for a male and one for a female for this new species, FROM SCRATCH!!

The DNA strands would have to include the "morphing of the embryo" algorithms," the timing issues, etc. etc. It is insane to think that humans could do this, yet God has done it for many, many species which have both a male and female.


There Are Many Other Issues we could talk about which would include the orbit of the earth around the sun (the earth must be the right distance from sun), the oceans, the clouds, trace minerals, the rotation of the earth, the importance of the moon, the physical constants, etc. Some of these are discussed on this website.


Click the back arrow or if you came to this page by a search engine, click this: Home Page