|
Patterns of Intelligence
|
|
Chapter 11: The Nail in the Coffin of Evolution - Part 2It was stated in the prior chapter that the initial population size of the "old species" was 100,000. So a person might wonder what the "relevant" population size is after male-0 and female-0 mate. In other words, starting with male-1 and female-1, what is the relevant population size? The relevant population size, starting with male-1 and female-1, is the population size of those born with the correct cumulative mutations to continue the process. These are the only animals which are available to create the next generation, after the first couple. Thus, the relevant population size is exactly two, not 100,000!! Once we start dealing with partial mutations we are dealing with only the population which are born with the same set of partial mutations. And these two must be a male and female, and a brother and sister. We have assumed that it is impossible for a male and female (which are born with the same set of cumulative mutations) will have more than 4 reproductive cells which have the same highly sophisticated partial mutations in their generation, thus we must conclude that only two of their offspring would be born with the same cumulative mutations (including the new mutations for their generation). Thus, the "population size" for the next generation will always be two and they must be brother and sister. This is an important point because evolutionists like to look at population sizes when talking about statistics. But after male-1 and female-1 are born, the population size is only relevant to those which are born with the same cumulative partial mutations, which means that the relevant population size (to continue the long process of making a new species) is always 2 after male-1 and female-1 are born. (Note: Some might say that if "twins" were born to a couple, then the available population size could be higher than 2. Whether the number 2, 3 or 4 is used for the "population size" is totally irrelevant to the bigger picture of what is going on in this example.) In other words, for 49 of the 50 generations, there is only one male on the planet and only one female on the planet, born with the perfect set of partial mutations, and they must be brother and sister, and they must have four virtually identical sets of mutations (2 in the male sperm and 2 in the female eggs) which yields one key male and one key female (which are born with the new set of correct mutations). This is why the relevant population size is only two in each generation. And among all of their reproductive cells; the cells that have the mutations must be the ones that interact to create the next generation male and female. Yet the partial mutations in the reproductive cells must be totally accidental, totally without direction, totally without any design or long-term plan, etc. This is the claim of evolution, it is not my claim. This is absurd in the case of the female but it is even more absurd in the case of the male because the male may have many thousands of sperm and the exact 2 sperm which have the correct mutations must be the ones used to create a male and female offspring!!
Integrating the Location IssueDid you count how many times the "location issue" was critical? Every time a reproductive cell was mentioned, the location issue was critical. The answer is 200 reproductive cells were needed to create this one new species (50 relevant generations times 4 reproductive cells in each generation). If the location issue was relevant twice, the theory of evolution would be insane, but it is relevant 200 times over a fairly short period of time, with very small population sizes (after the first generation) to make this one new species!! Are you beginning to comprehend the absurdity of the theory of evolution?? These things render the theory of evolution as being truly scientific nonsense. Yet, according to the theory of evolution this kind of nonsense has created tens of thousands of different species which had both a male and female on this planet in the timeframe of a few billion years. Such absurdity is not worthy to be called science. It is not even remotely worthy to be called insane. When combining "Genetic Chaos" (which is what I call the "location issue" in the long book) with the concepts of male and female and the concept of 50 generations of cumulative changes to the DNA; the theory of evolution becomes (as one author called it) a fairy tale. But it gets worse.
Genetic All-At-The-Same-TimeAs mentioned previously, once an errant nucleotide is fixed, there is nothing to prevent it from being "unfixed," meaning modified to an incorrect nucleotide even after it was corrected. There is no magic halo around correct nucleotides to prevent them from being changed into incorrect nucleotides!! At some point all of the nucleotides on the DNA must be correct at the same time! This includes both the target area and outside the target area!! Do you remember that for each nucleotide which was changed in the target area, far more nucleotides were changed outside the target area? Let us consider the following scenario for a male and female (for example: male-34 and female-34) which must mate in order to perpetuate the creation of a new species: On March 5th, male-34 of the species has one of the DNA in a sperm correct to make the next generation. On June 14th, female-34 of the species has one of the DNA in an egg correct to make the next generation. On August 3rd, male-34 of the species has a second DNA in a second sperm correct to make the next generation. On October 5th, female-34 of the species has a second DNA in a second egg correct to make the next generation. On December 18th, male-34 and female-34 mate. Do you think they will have viable offspring to create the next generation? Probably not. The reason is that on the day the male had his first set of nucleotides correct, his perfect DNA strand started to deteriorate. Mutations, in this scenario, are constantly happening. Thus, when a DNA is correct, the DNA will start to deteriorate immediately because there is nothing to "protect" correct nucleotides from becoming incorrect nucleotides. The reason is that when 100% of the nucleotides are correct, every mutation will be incorrect!!! There are no "target nucleotides" because every mutation is correct. Thus every nucleotide is a "stationary nucleotide." But mutations will continue to occur at the same rate even after the DNA is 100% correct!! Ditto for the other male DNA and for both female DNA. Thus, between March 5th and December 18th, every mutation of the first male DNA will be an incorrect mutation (this is a little simplified)!! By December 18th, there may be so much damage that the DNA will be unable to yield a viable offspring. What the term Genetic All-Right-At-The-Same-Time refers to is the moment of conception. Nucleotides can be changed at any time. 75% of all mutations are wrong mutations. At the moment of conception, all of the key male sperm and female eggs must be correct. An hour later, for example, one of the DNA may have had additional mutations and may not be able to produce viable offspring!! Thus, while the male and female DNA are constantly changing, at the moment of conception everything must be right at the same time. Thus, not only must the male and female DNA (all 4 key DNA strands) be correct at the same time, but they must mate within a short period of time of when their DNA was correct. Not only must the nucleotides inside the target area all be correct at the same time, the nucleotides outside the target area must also all be correct at the same time, for both the male and female. But in theory the target area of both the male and female should have zero nucleotides because their DNA must both be correct at the time of conception!! This is true of each of the four reproductive cells that are used in mating in each generation. In other words, not only do the new, deleted and changed mutations need to be correct at the same time, in all four reproductive cells, but they must mate at about this time. It is possible they could mate twice, and one "litter" would have the male and the other "litter" would have the female, but the male DNA of the male sperm and the male DNA of the female egg must still be right at the same time when they mate. Ditto for the creating the female. Thus, this Genetic "All-Right-At-The-Same-Time" concept must happen 100 times (50 times to make the males and 50 times to make the females)!! Truly, the theory of evolution is far beyond total nonsense.
Computer SimulationsI have run millions of computer simulations on simplified situations of this kind of phenomenon (the long book talks about many of the computer simulations), and the reader would be amazed at how quickly the DNA deteriorates!!! The DNA never, never recovers after a few dozen mutations. And never is all of the DNA right "at the same time." When using computer simulations the entire DNA of the species will deteriorate to being 25% correct and 75% incorrect. Never will all of the nucleotides be correct at the same time. The percent of correct nucleotides will eventually hover around 25% forever. The results of these computer simulations are perfectly logical because 75% of all mutations are incorrect nucleotides. In fact, the computer simulations support the logical data. This is one of the many reasons the probability of evolution is insane. And don't forget it frequently would take fifty generations of changes to make a single new species!! Every time a new species is found by archaeologists the theory of evolution becomes more and more absurd. In truth, a new species could never be developed by evolution. Never!! In the age of our Universe and a thousand other consecutive Universes, evolution could never have created a single complex species which had a male and a female. Yet, evolutionists claim it has happened tens of thousands of times on this planet alone, over the course of a few billions years. Nothing could be more ludicrous!! Now perhaps you have a glimpse into why I say the theory of evolution is scientific nonsense. I hope I have made it very clear that to assume that evolution ever occurred, on this planet or on any other planet, is insanely absurd. So where do new species come from? I will answer that question with another question: Where do sophisticated automobiles come from? They both come from design. They are created and designed, not randomly stuck together with an explosion and glue. At this point we should be able to see that the theory of evolution is scientific nonsense. In the age of our Universe, two animals in the same generation, are not likely to each have identical mutations to their DNA (i.e. mutations in the same location) in two sperm and two eggs and these very sperm and eggs interact to create a male and female. These must be very precise mutations because they are part of a long process needed to create 10 new genes, create the changes to the morphing of the embryo algorithms and make many other sophisticated changes. But when considering that this same impossible event must occur 50 times; to the descendants of the same pair of animals, with an available population size of only 2 (in 49 of the generations); is insane. No sane human being would ever believe such nonsense. It could not happen once in the timeframe of a thousand consecutive Universes.
The Mountain AnalogyLet us compare the evidence against the theory of evolution to a large mountain which is a thousand feet in the air. Let us compare the evidence for the theory of evolution to a person standing directly under the center of the mountain. What we have seen is an entire mountain, dropped from a thousand feet in the air, land on top of a person. The person will be dead. We do not have to endlessly discuss whether a bird landed on the mountain before it hit the person. We don't have to discuss whether it was raining or sunny. We don't have to discuss whether the person was wearing a raincoat or a football helmet. The person is dead. Similarly there is no way to hide the problems with the theory of evolution. The only thing that can stop the truth is the power of the scientific establishment and the only way they can stop the truth is to bury the truth, meaning keep the general public and students from hearing the truth. This is exactly what has been going on for several decades. It will not stop any time soon. You are on your own to find the truth because you will never hear the truth from the scientific establishment!! Scientists use the millions of fossils on this planet, combined with their vivid imaginations, story telling, wishful thinking and fairy tales, to invent imaginary evidence for a theory which never occurred on this planet or on any other planet. It is hard to get an evolutionist to speak a complete sentence that does not have the word "evolution" in it. It is hard to find a science magazine that doesn't have the word "evolution" in the title of several of its articles. The owners of the magazines are more interested in selling magazines than in finding the truth. And it is impossible to get an evolutionist to talk intelligently about the statistical problems of the theory of evolution. No mathematician with any integrity would ever believe in evolution. The reader should get used to the fact that the scientific establishment is not looking for the truth. The truth will always be ridiculed. While there are many scores of books which strongly challenge the validity of the theory of evolution; these books, and their massive amounts of evidence, are ignored by the scientific establishment!! They are "buried" or "blacklisted." Looking at evolution from the perspective of DNA, it would be far more probable to create a brand new car by an explosion in a junk yard than to create a new species by random mutations to DNA. The theory of evolution is nothing but wishful thinking. Scientists wish the theory of evolution were true. Sorry, but science should not work on wishes. The truth is that the theory of evolution is nothing but "smoke and mirrors" and a vast array of deceptive tactics, such as: assigning credit where there is no evidence credit should be applied, making massive assumptions, wishful thinking, story telling, intentionally ignoring relevant scientific facts, making claims which have no scientific merit, using very deceptive terminology, refusing to talk about statistics; and above all - ignoring and suppressing real science by exercising their power. What everything boils down to is a hatred of truth. Over and over and over again I have seen people who hate truth. They want to live in a fantasy world where they are the kings and queens. They are not interested in truth. To them, truth is irrelevant. What is important to them is power, money, prestige, and/or some other motive. I learned a long time ago that it is a waste of time to debate someone who is not looking for the truth. But truth is rarely the quest of anyone. I have seen this phenomenon in many, many scientific disciplines. Truth is like the child that no one wanted because the parents were too busy having fun, getting rich and becoming popular. If you have truly studied and understood this book so far - congratulations!!
The Four Engines of EvolutionNow that we have seen the absurdity of the theory of evolution, before going on let us review the four engines of evolution previously mentioned.
First, massive amounts of money to control key universities, the scientific establishment, the courts, etc., The theory of evolution is not going to go away precisely because of these four engines. There is no debate about the theory of evolution because there is nothing to debate. The theory of evolution is scientific nonsense. The reader should clearly understand that from a "scientific perspective" the theory of evolution is nonsense. But that does not mean the theory of evolution will ever go away. It will never go away because the theory of evolution is not about science, it is about money, atheism, deception and power.
Chapter 12: The Iceberg of Evolution
|