What Computer Programming Can Teach Us About Evolution
Let us compare the claim that the DNA of an existing species can be randomly mutated into the DNA of a new and improved species to a claim that the object code of a computer program could be randomly changed into the object code of a new and improved computer program (which has new features) by using nothing but random number generators. A random number generator would simulate the claims of the evolutionists that DNA can be randomly changed into a new and improved DNA strand via evolution.
When thinking about this remember that the DNA of a mouse is vastly more sophisticated than any computer program ever written.
When writing or changing a computer program in C# there are three steps:
Now suppose that a new computer programmer is hired who believes in the theory of evolution. This would be his or her approach to changing the program to make changes and additions to the program:
No computer programmer on this planet (even if they believed the theory of evolution) would choose these techniques!! It would be a waste of time and would totally destroy the old program and the new program would not have any new or old features that worked!!!
Yet the method of the new computer programmer is precisely the way that evolution must work!!! There is no "source code" for DNA, there is only "object code" on the DNA. Evolution can only RANDOMLY change the DNA via random mutations!! Doing this will damage the good parts of the DNA strand and will not yield any improvements.
Yet the atheists and evolutionists claim that the DNA of a perfectly good species can be randomly mutated (by evolution) and the random mutations will create a new and improved species EVERY TIME!!!
This chapter, from one of the free eBooks, graphically demonstrates the results of the pure randomness of evolution (study all of the bar charts):
Now perhaps you can see why random number generators can never be used to write computer programs!!!
DNA includes both data and computer programs vastly more sophisticated than any computer program ever written by any team of human beings!!! And "evolution":
With the discovery of DNA the evolution debate should have left the domain of biologists and been put under the domain of statisticians looking at DNA. But that will never happen because there are many atheists who need the theory of evolution to sell their books and get new converts to atheism!!
In addition to things on this earth, scientists also cannot create a single sun from scratch. And is it logical to think that our sun and all of the stars (e.g. the supergiant star VY Canis Majoris), galaxies, superclusters of galaxies, etc. in the Universe came to exist by an accidental explosion called the Big Bang?
While both sides of the evolution debate support the Big Bang because of the discovery of Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation, one side believes that the object that "exploded" was created by the accidents of evolution and that the explosion itself was an accident.
I don't think that the object that exploded (which had to contain the matter to create every atom in the Universe), was created by accidents!!!
It is absurd to claim that accidents created all DNA, all cells, all stars, all galaxies, etc. But these claims will never go away because the atheists and evolutionists will always be looking for converts. But the truth is that the claims of the atheists are complete scientific nonsense.
The prophets, past and present, are absolutely correct: God is the source of all DNA, cells, galaxies, etc.
Click the back arrow or if you came to this page by a search engine, click this: Home Page