Why Do We Need Computer Programmers?
Let us compare the claims of the evolutionists (i.e. that evolution created DNA) to humans writing computer programs. We can do this because computer programs are far LESS sophisticated than any DNA strand for any plant or animal. The question at hand is: "if evolution is true, why do we need computer programmers?"
Human computer programs (after being compiled) are in "base 2" (each "bit" is a '0' or '1') which is very similar to DNA, which is "base 4" (each nucleotide is an 'A' or 'C' or 'G' or 'T').
If new computer programs cannot be created by random number generators, or if newer computer programs cannot be made by randomly modifying existing computer programs with random number generators, then we can reject the theory of evolution because human computer programs are massively LESS COMPLEX than DNA!!!
But of the many millions of complex, or even moderately complex, computer programs on this planet; NONE OF THEM were written by random number generators to simulate the way that theory of evolution must work!! Every computer program has been written by intelligent human beings who studied computer languages and programming!!
They may be written from scratch or by modifying an existing program but all of them have been created by human intelligence.
In fact, the microchips in the computers and the computer languages were also designed and written by human beings, not by random number generators.
But if evolution were true, corporations would not need computer programmers. If evolution were true, all computer programs could be written by one of two methods:
Case #1) The computer program could be written from scratch by random number generators,
Case #2) Programmers could take an existing computer program and create a new and improved computer program, with new features, the same way evolution supposedly works; by randomly modifying the existing object code of a computer program with random number generators to choose where the modifications are made and what random changes are made (i.e. addition, deletion or change). The new program should work perfectly the first time, with new features, if evolution were true.
In the case of #1, no functional computer program on earth, that does something humans need, including entertainment, has ever been written exclusively by a random number generator.
In the case of #2, we must remember that because evolution always claims that new species created by evolution are superior to the old species; when we make a new computer program by randomly modifying an existing computer program; the new computer program made exclusively by random changes/mutations to an existing program must be more sophisticated and have new features that the original program did not have!!
And any menu system in the new computer program must accidentally have a new entry for the new section of code.
All of this is absurd!! And so is the theory of evolution after the discovery of DNA. Human DNA and the DNA of thousands of other species are massively more sophisticated than any human-generated computer program.
So let us summarize this. Millions of sophisticated computer programs were written by trained computer programmers. Yet evolution claims that more than a million far, far, far more sophisticated DNA strands for unique species were "written" by pure accidents, called "evolution."
This includes the claim that the two most complex and sophisticated computer programs on this planet, human male DNA and human female DNA, were "written" by a sequence of billions of random mutations to prior DNA by what is called "evolution."
And the two male DNA strands (one to create a male baby and one to create a female baby) and the DNA of the female must align with each other. At no time on this planet have any computer programmers tried to align the object code of two highly sophisticated computer programs to create a new computer program which has features of the original two computer programs!!
The word "evolution" and the word "accident" mean exactly the same thing. They both mean: without any intelligence or design by an intelligent being.
There is something very wrong with this picture!! If the concept of evolution were true, randomness would be far, far smarter than human beings - so why don't programmers write computer programs with random number generators to simulate evolution as just mentioned??
Anyone familiar with what I am talking about would say that this process would create trillions of faulty and worthless computer programs before there was a success. Actually, there would never be a success (e.g. a new computer program with a new and functional feature with a menu item pointing to that new feature).
It is ludicrous to think that any set of random mutations (to a computer program's binary code) would create a new and improved computer program which has new features.
Similarly, in trillions of attempts to create human DNA from the DNA of any primate there would be trillions of failures (i.e. dead animals which look like the primate but which could not survive) and ZERO successes!!
Where are the trillions of dead animals whose DNA mutated but the mutation failed to create a new and improved species?? There are none because the theory of evolution only exists in the vain imaginations of the evolutionists.
Human DNA is far beyond the comprehension of human beings, yet human DNA is claimed to have been "written" by mindless accidents to the DNA of another primate!! Such an attempt would lead to trillions of failures and zero successes. But there is no evidence of any failures.
In addition, random number generators are billions of times faster than a human being at writing computer programs!! Yet not a single functional computer program on this planet has been written by a random number generator to generate its binary code!!
Do you see the problem? EVERY complex computer program on this earth was written by an intelligent human being. But evolution teaches that EVERY DNA strand (of every plant and animal) was created by a long series of accidents!!!
But the truth is that EVERY computer program was designed and written by a human being and EVERY DNA strand was designed and written by God. Humans are not smart enough to design a DNA stand for an animal. So how could accidents "design" a DNA strand for an animal or a human??
The theory of evolution is totally absurd because every DNA strand is far more complex than any human-generated computer program.
The reason the theory of evolution exists is not because of science and mathematics, it exists because the leading atheists, such as Richard Dawkins, consider the theory of evolution to be their best chance to get converts to atheism!! And many others follow the lead of the leading atheists.
And that is the key as to why there is still a "theory of evolution." If everyone believed in God they would simply say (about anything they cannot understand regarding cells and DNA): "God knows and hopefully some day we can figure out how God did it."
Only God could create the level of sophistication needed to create the DNA for human males, human females and the DNA for thousands of other complex species. Life is far, far too complex to have been created by a random series of accidents.
To make matters worse for evolution, if evolution were true, the DNA of the first male and first female humans had to be created during the same timeframe (within 50 years of each other so they could mate before dying), and in the same location on this earth (so they could find each other and mate).
Plus their DNA must have aligned in such a way that the male DNA and female DNA mix together to have offspring, who have features of both parents. And they must have at least one male child and one female child.
Try doing that with two computer programs!!
Write two complex computer programs which are about the same length but have several different functions. Then create a third computer program which is created by this algorithm: for each bit on the new program randomly pick a bit, from the same slot, from either the first program or second program using a random number generator to determine if the bit comes from the first program or the second program.
See if you end up with a new computer program (a "baby" computer program) that has most of the features of one of the programs but also has features of the other program. It would never work in a million years!! The new program will not even run. Yet Mother Nature can combine the DNA of the male and the DNA of the female and end up with a healthy baby who has features of both parents!!
In addition, if a couple has seven children, excepting identical twins, every one of them will look different and have different personalities. But even identical twins have different personalities.
Yet the DNA of the father and mother do not change one iota between the day they were born until the day they die.
Click the back arrow or if you came to this page by a search engine, click this: Home Page